Knowledge

Talk:Birth of the Cool

Source đź“ť

1135:
To put this "release" in "1957" is revisionist history. The material was recorded and released, for the most part, by 1950. That's when it had its historical impact, and that's where it belongs in Miles Davis' history. The 1957 re-release was merely an attempt to keep up with format changes, with a few "bonus tracks" added, as is done even today with re-releases. How can we move forward with this? My attempt at fixing this yesterday was reversed. Looking up this talk page, clearly I'm not the first who has felt this way about the page.
1975:
his or hers (or their) position. Anyway! On with it. The second party's edit (which had remained, according to them for over a year here before I reverted it today) had made the release date in the infobox to claim "February or March 1957" and same in the lead, with multiple sources cited together, one claiming the March release and the other two or three claiming February. I reduced it to one source after seeing enough sources that made it in my mind a majority claim. After a bit back and forth, much off-topic, here we are.
1250:, How does this policy apply to music created in the pre-album era? (Which is what this is.) The physical release date of the majority of this material was 1949, and 1950, because in that era, the only medium on which jazz was consumed was 78 rpm singles. And that's when these recordings were actually released. Would you like me to create a page for each of the singles released on this album, in their proper place? Would that resolve it for you? 1775: 1538: 526:
played in the Royal Roost band but not on the studio recordings), and one by Phil Schaap about the radio broadcasts. It seems anal to me to insist that BOTC means the eleven tracks on the original 12" LP, the CD insert says that "Darn That Dream" has been included on the album for more than thirty years. (On getting out the RVG reissue, the Welding and Mulligan pieces are used as notes for that too, but not the Zwerin or Schaap). --
1268:
to be placed. I'm still awaiting justification of your yanking this music way out of the context of when it was actually created. Historical impact, in the case of Miles Davis, CAN be assessed. I will resort to several hardcover books for citations of this, if I must. Which is what the "average reader" would have done, prior to Knowledge. I find _your_ edit of this to be to be arbitary, and even POV. So we are at an impasse.
311: 290: 240: 222: 702: 692: 672: 662: 652: 642: 191: 321: 1319:. If I were trying to learn about the progression of Miles' Davis' music, which any number of people might want to do, I would not be able to use the infobox. You seem equally obsessed with keeping the infobox "unhelpful." Why? What does it mean so much to you to yank this album out of the chronology of when it was created? Who is that helping? 1637:. They may just mean that those albums are commercially available at the time of the magazine issue's publication, and it does not negate the possibility they'd been released the month before. Especially if, as you cited, another magazine had confirmed just as much. Anyway, I've replaced it with a better source for February 1957. 1517:. They may just mean that those albums are commercially available at the time of the magazine issue's publication, and it does not negate the possibility they'd been released the month before. Especially if, as you cited, another magazine had confirmed just as much. Anyway, I've replaced it with a better source for February 1957. 1216:
infobox design, keep in mind the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article (an article should remain complete with its summary infobox ignored). The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance." (
682: 594:
released: in 1949 and 1950. It strikes me as more confusing than helpful to locate this album in 1957, which is really a matter of converting it to the new 12" format. It was a commercial consideration, and most people old enough to have a vague grasp of the history of recording formats understand this.
1162:). An encyclopedia's role is not to clean up the flaws of the past, but to record and capture them as they are, which in the case you are describing, is a messy discography. So be it. As an online encyclopedia, we present content "accurately and in context rather than as 'the truth' or 'the best view'." ( 1974:
All right. Since I haven't gotten much response from the second party to this content dispute, particularly some key points, and instead gotten accusations of canvassing, I'm inviting others here in a completely unselective manner, although said party is still welcome to find further verification for
1851:
Refrain from canvassing your personal selection of editors. A simple notification here and or noticeboards if it's really that important to you will suffice. "Research" consisting of googling what you want to be the answer is not persuasive. There were three RS, one published by an academic press and
1480:
There is no forced logic at work. The title of this page is "Birth of the Cool". It's not "recordings made by Miles Davis and arranged by Gil Evans in the late 40s". Hence, the subject of this page is the compilation album "Birth of the Cool". The release date shown reflects that fact. The history of
1134:
In the case of materials recorded AND RELEASED in the pre-LP era, it makes more sense to place them in a chronology reflecting their actual time of first release. In 1949 and 1950, one would have bought a series of 78's to hear this material, and they would have filed them on their shelves together.
597:
For example: If a batch of material was released in a booklet with two 45 rpm singles in it in 1978, and finally came out as a CD in 1985 with a few bonus tracks from 1978, to my mind it would still make sense to place this in a Knowledge timeline in 1978. And this is typically the way it is done.
2350:
RfCs are meant to start with a brief, neutral, as far as possible, simple question. You can help us if you want by pointing us to prior discussion and pointing us in the direction of sources supporting each/various positions. Reading this is a waste of my time and that of others. I suggest you close
1449:
In fact, the material was conceived as a whole in 1949, and performed as such at the time. I'm hearing you, and noticing the forced logic. Out of curiosity, have you ever held a 78 rpm record or 10" LP in your hand? I'm asking this for the sake of future discussion. You seem to find something really
1434:
In fact, the material was conceived as a whole in 1949, and performed as such at the time. I'm hearing you, and noticing the forced logic. Out of curiosity, have you ever held a 78 rpm record or 10" LP in your hand? I'm asking this for the sake of future discussion. You seem to find something really
1267:
This page, by the way, does not refer to just one album, but to at least five compilations of "Birth of the Cool." First on the page, as it should be, is the release of the singles themselves, in 1949-50. By your own arguments, one could conclude that this is the least confusing place for the page
525:
The "Complete Birth of the Cool" CD includes detailed notes by Pete Welding about the origins and history of the nonet, which I've taken most of tonight's additions from. It also includes a shorter piece by Gerry Mulligan from 1971 in which he says Miles was the bandleader, one by Mike Zwerin (who
2220:
after you edit warred to try to force through your edit, I largely agree with you. As a matter of weight, I see no value in including a footnote about the error in the usually reliable trade journal source. I suggest withdrawing the RFC, as no-one opposes the change now that you've cited scholarly
1659:
I appreciate your good faith desire to ensure reliable sources are cited. Your claim that it represents a synthesis is a misunderstanding of that policy: no synthesis has been produced. I maintain that "March album releases" means albums released in March, as that's the natural language meaning of
1188:
There are multiple recording dates involved in this compilation, and in other compilations, otherwise it would not be a compilation. If you want readers to place or give a timeframe to a recording's historical impact, that information and chronological dating can be captured at the article for the
593:
Although the first complete compilation was released in 1957, this merely is a matter of changing formats. I would think anyone going to Knowledge to understand the history of jazz would find it more useful to see this page where the lion's share of the material was first performed, recorded and
1215:
You are getting too focused on pimping out the infobox for specialist readers (when the majority of readers don't need such a chronology) and trying to fix something that's not broken. Please keep in mind that infoboxes are not essential to articles for a reason: "When considering any aspect of
443:, however, it was composed by Evans & Davis and merely credited to Henry. As it's officially credited to Henry, his name should stay, but we could add a note about its true origins (though some more support for this notion besides a single online article should be required first). ¦ 1464:
8 of these recordings were released by 1950. Should I just make a separate sessions page for them, as i've done for other classic 78rpm-era sessions when encountering this curious lack of understanding of how 78s were consumed? so be it. I'll see you there, maybe.
2020:, because none of the sources is explicit about the exact day of release, and we have multiple sources for each month. Advertisements in music magazines are weak sources because they may precede or follow the actual release date. Point of order: it is 1852:
two immediately contemporary to the event. They disagree on the precise month, so both were given and the sources cited. Deleting all three sources because... well you've made no attempt to justify it so I have no idea why – is not appropriate.
2064: 1150:"In general, all albums and EPs should be placed in a single, chronological chain in order of release date. Exceptions may be appropriate for artists with very complex discographies which may warrant more than one chain." ( 153: 1510:, the proper thing to do now is continue this discussion here, as I cautioned you at your talk page and the recent edit summary. For record's sake, and any other interested parties, I will report my comments here: 2094: 2083: 2072: 1746:
idea, which is what I quoted. You used "or" to combine those dates into that idea; a conjuction doesn't separate words or ideas but combines them. Your entry into the released field is a synthesis.
1534:
idea, which is what I quoted. You used "or" to combine those dates into that idea; a conjuction doesn't separate words or ideas but combines them. Your entry into the released field is a synthesis.
1116: 400: 2127: 1778:
as the majority claim. And I cited one of those sources. I would not object to an adjascent footnote being made to encapsulate whatever few sources there might be that say March...
1541:
as the majority claim. And I cited one of those sources. I would not object to an adjascent footnote being made to encapsulate whatever few sources there might be that say March...
1881:: I think I justified myself to warrant a discussion and undo your original edit. And I think I pinged editors without any bias, but maybe you can enlighten me about that too ... 1873: 1774:
Making a footnote of a minority claim (and potential error) is fine, but some quick research into Google Books' catalogue of online-available publications seems to support
1537:
Making a footnote of a minority claim (and potential error) is fine, but some quick research into Google Books' catalogue of online-available publications seems to support
147: 1919:
I offered a compromise for your (so far) apparently lone source for March. And you had the audacity to defend it with a status quo argument (which doesn't even appear at
1051: 1047: 1033: 935: 931: 917: 813: 809: 795: 468:...right. I don't really doubt that it's Davis and Evans, but let's not resort to basing all our information off quasi-stubs written by anonymous users. ¦ 2172:, and find some sources that back up giving March any weight here. As far as the content is concerned, the March claim is overwhelmingly outnumbered here. 1013: 79: 426:
I thought the same thing, but I could be wrong. I'm an idiot for not owning this CD, so when I pick it up I'll come back here and fix/add what I can.
577:
because he was under contract from one recording company and then had recorded for another. This is not uncommon during that time of the 40s and 50s.
44: 1634: 1514: 2409: 560: 2404: 377: 367: 85: 2394: 2108: 903: 2414: 2345: 1120: 573:
Cleo Henry is a false name given due to contractual copyright problems; it is Davis and Evans. Charlie Parker used the false name of
1792:
I did nothing of the sort. Are you now arguing that February and March are the same idea? This is veering into the absurd. Following
1660:
that phrase; it's also the purpose of listings such as those in trade journals i.e. indicating to retailers newly available product.
761: 1029:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
913:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
404: 256: 631:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section. 168: 2389: 343: 251:, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the 99: 30: 135: 2399: 2324:
Go project and blame deflect onto whoever's lodged a complaint against you at ANI. See how far your pretenses get you there.
2120: 104: 20: 1407:
I have already told you why. You keep asking for reasons and explanations, yet not listening or accepting what I've said.
74: 2135: 1094: 978: 856: 555: 252: 247: 227: 202: 1014:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121106162232/http://www.scribd.com/doc/35654619/Miles-Davis-Birth-of-the-Cool-Hal-Leonard
2296: 2229: 1860: 1808: 1719: 1668: 1618: 1488: 891: 65: 1315:
I don't know how "pimping" has any connection to what I am doing, and that's not a terribly kind expression to use,
1680:"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source." 1525:"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source." 334: 295: 129: 2024:
a synthesis of sources to tell the reader that one group of sources says February while another group says March.
2003:
the March claim with some wording that frames it as a minority claim against the many other sources listed below.
1481:
the recordings which appear on the compilation are discussed in the body of the article. It's not rocket science.
1050:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1023: 1017: 934:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
812:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
755: 1470: 1455: 1440: 1324: 1290: 1140: 607: 125: 1798:
If reliable sources disagree, then maintain a neutral point of view and present what the various sources say
1085: 1005: 969: 883: 847: 747: 599: 550: 531: 482: 459: 109: 2290: 2223: 2163: 1854: 1802: 1713: 1662: 1612: 1505: 1483: 1151: 1001: 715: 1166:) And Knowledge is not meant to list items excessively for specialists or to confuse the general reader ( 175: 2269:
You're clearly a know-it-all when it comes to my ulterior or unconscious motives. Why would I stop now?
2029: 1069:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1057: 953:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
941: 831:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
819: 208: 1004:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 882:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 746:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 503:
This is accurate. I've added this and cited a respectable source (Sultanof's article on the subject).
904:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080924120325/http://www.jazz.com/dozens/the-dozens-the-birth-of-the-cool
419: 2140: 786: 2367: 2325: 2314: 2270: 2243: 2173: 2148: 2039: 2004: 1976: 1953: 1928: 1902: 1882: 1846: 1820: 1779: 1747: 1698: 1683: 1654: 1638: 1592: 1542: 1154:). Historical impact is a subjective notion that cannot be clearly discerned by the average reader ( 190: 2371: 2329: 2318: 2274: 2247: 2188: 2177: 2152: 2043: 2008: 1980: 1957: 1932: 1906: 1886: 1824: 1783: 1751: 1687: 1642: 1596: 1582: 1546: 1466: 1451: 1436: 1320: 1286: 1136: 603: 161: 55: 762:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081012063305/http://www.jazz.com:80/jazz-blog/2008/9/3/birth-of-cool
342:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2356: 2000: 1217: 1159: 584: 527: 508: 478: 455: 70: 1800:, which is what was done. Your attempt to paint this as a synthesis is not grounded in reality. 1682:
Which of the sources you cited concludes it was released in "either February or March of 1957"?
1527:
Which of the sources you cited concludes it was released in "either February or March of 1957"?
1408: 1370: 1316: 1247: 1221: 1194: 1171: 1054:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
938:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
816:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1070: 954: 832: 141: 1707:", but rather each is cited for one of those dates. You may like to familiarise yourself with 1574: 1167: 1163: 997: 907: 875: 739: 711: 51: 24: 2025: 1901:
wanted to play this game. Now you have your poorly sourced claim tagged up, ugly and all...
562: 1077: 961: 839: 2285: 2242::: Why would I withdraw the RfC if my point is to make this a battleground, as you say??? 2101: 1630: 1589:
this either/or release date(s) attributed to two contemporaneous trade magazine albums ads
1520: 1412: 1374: 1225: 1198: 1190: 1175: 2216:
of talk templates. Now that you have adduced a number of scholarly sources, rather than
454:
article says the name is Davis's grandmother's, and he and Evans did write the tune. --
2113: 1155: 1036:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 920:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 897: 798:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 765: 440: 1076:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
960:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
838:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
399:
The recording order seems to differ under the headings Recording and Recording Dates.
2383: 2352: 1924: 1920: 1566: 1558: 628: 580: 504: 427: 727:
Last edited at 07:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
1952:(about a good faith effort to reach you) that frightens people off of Knowledge... 892:
http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1578474/a/Birth%2BOf%2BThe%2BCool.htm
2366:
Withdrawing, and apologizing for the stupid portions of my time here. Thank you.
2078: 1793: 1708: 1043: 927: 805: 469: 444: 326: 2089: 1042:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 926:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 804:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 451: 316: 310: 289: 239: 221: 1024:
http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1578474/a/Birth+Of+The+Cool.htm
1018:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/35654619/Miles-Davis-Birth-of-the-Cool-Hal-Leonard
756:
http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1578474/a/Birth+Of+The+Cool.htm
1369:
to have been recorded in 1949 and 1950, before an album was even a thought.
2375: 2360: 2333: 2302: 2278: 2251: 2235: 2181: 2156: 2047: 2033: 2012: 1984: 1961: 1936: 1910: 1890: 1866: 1828: 1814: 1787: 1755: 1725: 1691: 1674: 1646: 1624: 1600: 1550: 1492: 1474: 1459: 1444: 1416: 1378: 1328: 1294: 1229: 1202: 1179: 1144: 1124: 1099: 983: 861: 719: 688:
A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
611: 588: 567: 535: 512: 486: 472: 463: 430: 408: 320: 1819:
Saying the album was released in one month or the other is one idea.
1927:) all to preserve your original edit, or maybe just your ego . . . 1113:
as found at the end of the "Thornhill's influence" section, means?
658:
A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
602:
here, and agree with the unsigned OP (from 21:03, 7 March 2009)‎
1109:
Which of you musical geniuses can explain to us what the oxymoron
678:
A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
549:
It was released in 1957. The date is the release date. Regards.--
339: 439:
on the back of my copy (2001 RVG reissue on CD). According to
418:
I'm pretty sure "Boplicity" is by Gil Evans and Miles Davis --
184: 15: 1711:. For example, the fifth sentence at the top of that policy. 1555:
Pinging some fellow contributors from the article's history:
1629:
Hey. I don't know if you've been creating these speculative
771:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
2038:
Point of order: We don't have multiple sources for March.
908:
http://www.jazz.com/dozens/the-dozens-the-birth-of-the-cool
1008:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
886:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
750:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
668:
At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
255:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1361:
in 1950 (or 1949). Davis did not record these songs with
708:
A casual reader should learn something about the album.
2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2198: 2195: 2192: 2169: 1949: 1588: 879: 743: 623: 1450:
esoteric that i find commonplace, in all our debates.
1435:
esoteric that i find commonplace, in all our debates.
1285:
I sure would love it if others would weigh in on this.
160: 2060:
Sources that name February 1957 as the release date:
2351:
it and if necessary open a new RfC properly framed.
898:
http://www.jazz.com/jazz-blog/2008/9/3/birth-of-cool
766:
http://www.jazz.com/jazz-blog/2008/9/3/birth-of-cool
338:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1046:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 930:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 808:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 627:, and are posted here for posterity. Following 1032:This message was posted before February 2018. 916:This message was posted before February 2018. 794:This message was posted before February 2018. 2074:Miles Davis: The Complete Illustrated History 621:The comment(s) below were originally left at 174: 8: 2313:Again with the pathetic insinuations 🙄 ... 1633:dates elsewhere, but be careful when citing 1587:. For the record, the content in dispute is 1189:individual recording from the compilation. ( 2221:sources giving weight to the earlier date. 545:Why under 1957 albums? Should be 1950, no? 1246:Written before your most recent comment: 698:Categorisation at least by artist and year 284: 216: 1365:in mind. The recordings that appear here 996:I have just modified 2 external links on 874:I have just modified 3 external links on 738:I have just modified 2 external links on 1969:RfC: Which release date should be kept? 1950:This is the kind of self-deceptive crap 1130:Proper Chronology for Birth of the Cool 598:In short, I respectfully disagree with 286: 218: 188: 2191:. We'll leave aside for a moment your 1704: 1117:2602:30A:C0A1:1530:D553:A951:D0A2:7C29 2066:101 Albums That Changed Popular Music 783:to let others know (documentation at 7: 401:2001:18E8:2:11B7:25BE:8286:7814:C59A 332:This article is within the scope of 245:This article is within the scope of 2284:The crushing disappointment of the 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 1152:Template:Infobox album#Chronology 1000:. Please take a moment to review 878:. Please take a moment to review 742:. Please take a moment to review 629:several discussions in past years 2321:) 04:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 700: 690: 680: 670: 660: 650: 640: 319: 309: 288: 238: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2410:WikiProject Jazz album articles 1022:Corrected formatting/usage for 896:Corrected formatting/usage for 890:Corrected formatting/usage for 754:Corrected formatting/usage for 624:Talk:Birth of the Cool/Comments 372:This article has been rated as 1606:Birth of the Cool release date 1125:08:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC) 477:Ian Carr's biography, p55. -- 1: 2376:21:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC) 2361:09:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 2334:04:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 2303:03:44, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 2279:03:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 2252:03:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 2236:03:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 2182:23:49, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2157:23:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2129:Historical Dictionary of Jazz 2121:the African American Registry 2048:07:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 2034:07:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 2013:02:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 1985:02:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 1962:23:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1937:23:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1911:23:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1891:23:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1867:23:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1829:22:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1815:22:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1788:22:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1756:22:47, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1742:You used two sources to cite 1726:22:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1692:21:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1675:21:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1647:21:20, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1625:23:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1601:22:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1551:22:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1530:You used two sources to cite 1100:08:46, 24 December 2017 (UTC) 536:22:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 487:15:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 473:15:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 464:11:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 346:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2405:Top-importance Jazz articles 2168:, Please stop it with these 1493:20:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 1475:07:17, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 1460:07:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 1445:07:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 1417:22:59, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 1379:22:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 1329:22:46, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 1295:22:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 1230:22:37, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 1203:22:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 1180:22:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 1145:19:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 862:05:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC) 648:All the start class criteria 612:19:12, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 589:02:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 409:15:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 265:Knowledge:WikiProject Albums 2395:WikiProject Albums articles 710:Lacks technical personnel. 268:Template:WikiProject Albums 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2431: 1063:(last update: 5 June 2024) 993:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 947:(last update: 5 June 2024) 871:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 825:(last update: 5 June 2024) 735:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 568:11:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC) 521:Complete Birth of the Cool 447:03:51, 2005 July 20 (UTC) 378:project's importance scale 352:Knowledge:WikiProject Jazz 2415:WikiProject Jazz articles 2208:irrelevant policies, and 1872:I don't see any month in 984:00:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 720:07:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 636: 513:16:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 431:03:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 422:13:06, 2005 July 8 (UTC) 371: 355:Template:WikiProject Jazz 304: 233: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2187:You're rather excitedly 2136:February 9 1957 trade ad 2126:Davis, John S. (2020). 2123:'s entry on Miles Davis 989:External links modified 867:External links modified 731:External links modified 2390:B-Class Album articles 2218:citing a google search 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 2400:B-Class Jazz articles 1703:The sources are not " 1499:Release date edit war 637:Article requirements: 100:Neutral point of view 1999:but I am willing to 1610:: Cambial Yellowing 1044:regular verification 928:regular verification 806:regular verification 105:No original research 2170:stupid insinuations 2096:The MOJO Collection 1111:"unison harmonies," 1105:Hey, Wikipedians... 1034:After February 2018 918:After February 2018 796:After February 2018 775:parameter below to 1635:sources like these 1515:sources like these 1353:The album was not 1218:MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE 1088:InternetArchiveBot 1039:InternetArchiveBot 972:InternetArchiveBot 923:InternetArchiveBot 850:InternetArchiveBot 801:InternetArchiveBot 617:Assessment comment 414:Boplicity composer 248:WikiProject Albums 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2349: 2164:Cambial Yellowing 2117:, by Jim Santella 1506:Cambial Yellowing 1485:Cambial Yellowing 1064: 998:Birth of the Cool 948: 876:Birth of the Cool 826: 740:Birth of the Cool 725: 724: 392: 391: 388: 387: 384: 383: 283: 282: 279: 278: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 25:Birth of the Cool 2422: 2343: 2301: 2234: 2167: 2085:Why Jazz Happend 1865: 1850: 1813: 1799: 1724: 1702: 1681: 1673: 1658: 1623: 1586: 1578: 1570: 1562: 1526: 1509: 1491: 1098: 1089: 1062: 1061: 1040: 982: 973: 946: 945: 924: 860: 851: 824: 823: 802: 790: 707: 704: 703: 697: 694: 693: 687: 684: 683: 677: 674: 673: 667: 664: 663: 657: 654: 653: 647: 644: 643: 634: 633: 626: 553: 360: 359: 356: 353: 350: 335:WikiProject Jazz 329: 324: 323: 313: 306: 305: 300: 292: 285: 273: 272: 269: 266: 263: 242: 235: 234: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2380: 2379: 2346:Summoned by bot 2289: 2286:Pyrrhic victory 2222: 2189:jumping the gun 2161: 2058: 1993: 1971: 1853: 1844: 1801: 1797: 1712: 1696: 1679: 1661: 1652: 1611: 1608: 1580: 1572: 1564: 1556: 1524: 1503: 1501: 1482: 1132: 1107: 1092: 1087: 1055: 1048:have permission 1038: 1006:this simple FaQ 991: 976: 971: 939: 932:have permission 922: 884:this simple FaQ 869: 854: 849: 817: 810:have permission 800: 784: 748:this simple FaQ 733: 705: 701: 695: 691: 685: 681: 675: 671: 665: 661: 655: 651: 645: 641: 622: 619: 565: 558: 551: 543: 541:Category error? 523: 416: 397: 395:Recording Order 357: 354: 351: 348: 347: 325: 318: 298: 270: 267: 264: 261: 260: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2428: 2426: 2418: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2382: 2381: 2364: 2363: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2239: 2238: 2145: 2144: 2133: 2124: 2118: 2114:All About Jazz 2106: 2092: 2081: 2070: 2069:by Chris Smith 2057: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2023: 2018:February–March 2015: 1992: 1989: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1940: 1939: 1914: 1913: 1878: 1877: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1607: 1604: 1583:Sojambi Pinola 1500: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1467:Sojambi Pinola 1452:Sojambi Pinola 1437:Sojambi Pinola 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1321:Sojambi Pinola 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1287:Sojambi Pinola 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1183: 1182: 1137:Sojambi Pinola 1131: 1128: 1106: 1103: 1082: 1081: 1074: 1027: 1026: 1020: 1012:Added archive 990: 987: 966: 965: 958: 911: 910: 902:Added archive 900: 894: 868: 865: 844: 843: 836: 769: 768: 760:Added archive 758: 732: 729: 723: 722: 699: 689: 679: 669: 659: 649: 638: 618: 615: 604:Sojambi Pinola 571: 570: 563: 556: 542: 539: 522: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 415: 412: 396: 393: 390: 389: 386: 385: 382: 381: 374:Top-importance 370: 364: 363: 361: 344:the discussion 331: 330: 314: 302: 301: 299:Top‑importance 293: 281: 280: 277: 276: 274: 271:Album articles 243: 231: 230: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2427: 2416: 2413: 2411: 2408: 2406: 2403: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2393: 2391: 2388: 2387: 2385: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2347: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2322: 2320: 2316: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2294: 2293: 2287: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2266: 2264: 2263: 2261: 2260: 2258: 2257: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2237: 2233: 2232: 2227: 2226: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2206:references to 2203: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2165: 2159: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2143: 2142: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2130: 2125: 2122: 2119: 2116: 2115: 2110: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2067: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2055: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1990: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1946: 1944: 1943: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1917: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1858: 1857: 1848: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1806: 1805: 1795: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1776:February 1957 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1727: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1716: 1710: 1706: 1700: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1666: 1665: 1656: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1616: 1615: 1605: 1603: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1584: 1576: 1568: 1560: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1539:February 1957 1535: 1533: 1528: 1522: 1518: 1516: 1511: 1507: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1129: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1112: 1104: 1102: 1101: 1096: 1091: 1090: 1079: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1059: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1021: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1007: 1003: 999: 994: 988: 986: 985: 980: 975: 974: 963: 959: 956: 952: 951: 950: 943: 937: 933: 929: 925: 919: 914: 909: 905: 901: 899: 895: 893: 889: 888: 887: 885: 881: 877: 872: 866: 864: 863: 858: 853: 852: 841: 837: 834: 830: 829: 828: 821: 815: 811: 807: 803: 797: 792: 788: 782: 778: 774: 767: 763: 759: 757: 753: 752: 751: 749: 745: 741: 736: 730: 728: 721: 717: 713: 709: 635: 632: 630: 625: 616: 614: 613: 609: 605: 601: 595: 591: 590: 586: 582: 578: 576: 569: 566: 561: 559: 554: 548: 547: 546: 540: 538: 537: 533: 529: 520: 514: 510: 506: 502: 501: 500: 499: 488: 484: 480: 476: 475: 474: 471: 467: 466: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 448: 446: 442: 438: 434: 433: 432: 429: 425: 424: 423: 421: 413: 411: 410: 406: 402: 394: 379: 375: 369: 366: 365: 362: 358:Jazz articles 345: 341: 337: 336: 328: 322: 317: 315: 312: 308: 307: 303: 297: 294: 291: 287: 275: 258: 254: 250: 249: 244: 241: 237: 236: 232: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2365: 2340: 2323: 2312: 2311: 2297: 2291: 2268: 2265: 2262: 2259: 2256: 2241: 2240: 2230: 2224: 2193:increasingly 2160: 2146: 2139: 2128: 2112: 2109:Album review 2100: 2095: 2084: 2073: 2065: 2059: 2017: 1996: 1973: 1972: 1948: 1945: 1942: 1916: 1898: 1895: 1880: 1879: 1874:Smith's book 1861: 1855: 1843: 1809: 1803: 1743: 1720: 1714: 1669: 1663: 1628: 1619: 1613: 1609: 1575:Philip Cross 1554: 1536: 1531: 1529: 1519: 1513:When citing 1512: 1502: 1484: 1463: 1448: 1433: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1133: 1115: 1110: 1108: 1086: 1083: 1058:source check 1037: 1031: 1028: 995: 992: 970: 967: 942:source check 921: 915: 912: 873: 870: 848: 845: 820:source check 799: 793: 780: 776: 772: 770: 737: 734: 726: 712:Andrzejbanas 639: 620: 596: 592: 579: 575:Charlie Chan 574: 572: 544: 524: 436: 435:It does say 417: 398: 373: 333: 253:project page 246: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2079:Ashley Kahn 2026:Binksternet 1991:Conclusions 1631:synthesized 1160:WP:AUDIENCE 787:Sourcecheck 420:68.5.86.167 327:Jazz portal 148:free images 31:not a forum 2384:Categories 2105:(magazine) 2090:Marc Myers 2056:Discussion 1363:this album 1168:WP:NOTPLOT 1164:WP:PILLARS 1095:Report bug 979:Report bug 857:Report bug 452:Cleo Henry 437:Cleo Henry 257:discussion 2368:Piotr Jr. 2326:Piotr Jr. 2315:Piotr Jr. 2271:Piotr Jr. 2244:Piotr Jr. 2204:, absurd 2174:Piotr Jr. 2149:Piotr Jr. 2141:Billboard 2132:, p. xxiv 2040:Piotr Jr. 2005:Piotr Jr. 1977:Piotr Jr. 1954:Piotr Jr. 1929:Piotr Jr. 1903:Piotr Jr. 1883:Piotr Jr. 1847:Piotr Jr. 1821:Piotr Jr. 1780:Piotr Jr. 1748:Piotr Jr. 1699:Piotr Jr. 1684:Piotr Jr. 1655:Piotr Jr. 1639:Piotr Jr. 1593:Piotr Jr. 1543:Piotr Jr. 1359:conceived 1078:this tool 1071:this tool 962:this tool 955:this tool 840:this tool 833:this tool 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2353:Pincrete 2292:Cambial 2225:Cambial 2199:personal 2196:unhinged 2001:footnote 1997:February 1856:Cambial 1804:Cambial 1715:Cambial 1705:combined 1664:Cambial 1614:Cambial 1567:Dhoffryn 1559:Graham87 1521:WP:SYNTH 1367:happened 1191:WP:CFORK 1084:Cheers.— 968:Cheers.— 846:Cheers.— 581:Jcooper1 505:Ehburrus 428:Uttaddmb 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2341:Comment 2298:foliar❧ 2231:foliar❧ 2202:attacks 1862:foliar❧ 1810:foliar❧ 1721:foliar❧ 1670:foliar❧ 1620:foliar❧ 1355:created 1156:WP:NPOV 1002:my edit 880:my edit 773:checked 744:my edit 376:on the 199:B-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2210:misuse 1925:WP:3RR 1921:WP:BRD 781:failed 470:Reisio 445:Reisio 262:Albums 228:Albums 205:scale. 126:Google 2214:abuse 1523:says 1409:Dan56 1371:Dan56 1317:Dan56 1248:Dan56 1222:Dan56 1195:Dan56 1172:Dan56 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2372:talk 2357:talk 2330:talk 2319:talk 2275:talk 2248:talk 2212:and 2178:talk 2153:talk 2147:... 2102:Mojo 2044:talk 2030:talk 2009:talk 1981:talk 1958:talk 1933:talk 1907:talk 1887:talk 1825:talk 1794:Wp:V 1784:talk 1752:talk 1709:WP:V 1688:talk 1643:talk 1597:talk 1547:talk 1471:talk 1456:talk 1441:talk 1413:talk 1375:talk 1325:talk 1291:talk 1226:talk 1199:talk 1176:talk 1141:talk 1121:talk 777:true 716:talk 608:talk 585:talk 532:talk 509:talk 483:talk 460:talk 450:The 441:this 405:talk 349:Jazz 340:jazz 296:Jazz 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2138:in 2099:by 2088:by 2077:by 2022:not 1923:or 1899:You 1744:one 1532:one 1489:(❧) 1357:or 1193:). 1170:). 1052:RfC 1016:to 936:RfC 906:to 814:RfC 791:). 779:or 764:to 600:GoP 552:GoP 528:ajn 479:ajn 456:ajn 368:Top 176:TWL 2386:: 2374:) 2359:) 2332:) 2295:— 2288:. 2277:) 2250:) 2228:— 2180:) 2155:) 2111:, 2046:) 2032:) 2011:) 1983:) 1960:) 1935:) 1909:) 1889:) 1859:— 1827:) 1807:— 1796:, 1786:) 1754:) 1718:— 1690:) 1667:— 1645:) 1617:— 1599:) 1591:. 1579:, 1571:, 1563:, 1549:) 1473:) 1458:) 1443:) 1415:) 1377:) 1327:) 1293:) 1228:) 1220:) 1201:) 1178:) 1158:, 1143:) 1123:) 1065:. 1060:}} 1056:{{ 949:. 944:}} 940:{{ 827:. 822:}} 818:{{ 789:}} 785:{{ 718:) 610:) 587:) 534:) 511:) 485:) 462:) 407:) 156:) 54:; 2370:( 2355:( 2348:) 2344:( 2328:( 2317:( 2273:( 2246:( 2176:( 2166:: 2162:@ 2151:( 2042:( 2028:( 2007:( 1979:( 1956:( 1931:( 1905:( 1885:( 1876:. 1849:: 1845:@ 1823:( 1782:( 1750:( 1701:: 1697:@ 1686:( 1657:: 1653:@ 1641:( 1595:( 1585:: 1581:@ 1577:: 1573:@ 1569:: 1565:@ 1561:: 1557:@ 1545:( 1508:: 1504:@ 1469:( 1454:( 1439:( 1411:( 1373:( 1323:( 1289:( 1224:( 1197:( 1174:( 1139:( 1119:( 1097:) 1093:( 1080:. 1073:. 981:) 977:( 964:. 957:. 859:) 855:( 842:. 835:. 714:( 706:Y 696:Y 686:N 676:Y 666:Y 656:Y 646:Y 606:( 583:( 564:N 557:T 530:( 507:( 481:( 458:( 403:( 380:. 259:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Birth of the Cool
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Albums
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Albums

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑