Talk:Blair Waldorf

785:

alumni interviewer, only to end it when she finds out that he was married and had a daughter also studying at Constance." That shouldn't be in a section titled "Summary". The article focuses too much on the TV series. This article is about the character, not just the TV character. I find it funny that the entire novel series gets one, very small section and a reception section (accompanied by a photo of Ms. Leighton Meester) and the TV series gets three sections (which have excessive amounts of intricate detail), a casting section and a reception section. Also, there are no external links.

534: 516: 370: 466: 448: 190: 2001: 1912: 1898: 1855: 1819: 1753: 1743: 1567: 1553: 1539: 1321: 1287: 308: 360: 339: 1139: 1453:. I was unfamiliar with this process before. I'm wary of doing this, given how long it took to get a review -- but I do want things to be processed fairly, so I did it anyway. As you've read the entire article, do you really feel that grammatical issues are prevalent enough to warrant this? Anyway, it's been submitted for copyediting. -- 1052:

Blair is seen attending the Sacrament of Confession at a Roman Catholic Church, but admits to not being Catholic. Her mother marries Cyrus Rose, who is a devout Jew.. does Blair become Jewish? I know she says "signs are for the religious and superstitious" in the last season, which implies she is not

992:

I've tried combining the two. My stance is that "reception" includes both the critical acclaim for the way she's written, and the media attention for the way they dress her. They're two different kinds of accolades, but both notable in regard to this character, which is why I figured they should each

877:

Thanks for the tip. I've tried to limit the lead references to things related to BLP. What lead paragraphs are you referring to with regard to the rest of the article? As for the intricate detail regarding the show, I've made efforts to remove some of that when I've seen it added (such as yesterday),

821:

My focus has primarily been on the "Reception" section, the lead, and the two new sections that were added not long ago ("Creation" and "Casting"). I don't really know much about the character's story lines, so I haven't really focused on the other sections. With regard to expanding the novel series

1688:

Yes, I know what verifiability means. In any case, I've re-checked the links, and replaced or removed the ones that weren't working. The Way Back machine apparently didn't have them, so I used caches. I've clicked on the remaining highlighted links, and they still appear to verify the claims within

1339:

Additionally, I've been making some minor tweaks to sentences and grammar. I don't want to continue doing that, so I suggest getting a copy editor to run over the article. Be sure that language, especially tense, is consistent throughout article. The novels section doesn't need separate subsections

1653:

Ref #2 cites a webpage which is not responsive. If something is important enough to be referenced in the article, then that reference should be verifiable - in the case of a website, if you click on it, it should go to a readable page. This is why I suggested using the Way Back Machine from . Many

1107:

to Good Article status, but I don't know if Blair Waldorf is ready just yet. The "Novel series" section is still lacking when it comes to sources, and there may be some other issues as well. With a bit more work, it may be GA level, though I, personally, don't have much time to do this anymore. Of

728:

I don't understand why a picture of Blair Waldorf on the cover of a book is her profile picture. All the other main characters have pictures from the show as their profile pictures, so why doesn't Blair? I would much rather prefer that the profile picture is one of Leighton Meester. (Sorry if this

784:

This article could use some improvements, such as the lead section. A lead section shouldn't contain references, because a lead section shouldn't tell you anything that isn't verified in the body of the article. Various odd placements of intricate detail, "She started a brief fling with her Yale

758:

No, stop, this is ridiculous. The entry for Leopold Bloom, the protagonist from Joyce's Ulysses, is about a third the length of this. And that's widely considered the greatest novel of the twentieth century...There's utterly no justification for an entry on a fictional soap television/paperback

683:

Hi. I can certainly see her face just fine in the current one. "No visibility" is inaccurate. In any case, I'd prefer the current image, or another, to the proposed replacement, which is quite dated and overused. They have a pretty good image over at Wikia, though I'm not sure of the source. --

1708:

Make sure that all statements about characterization are referenced, either from an independent source, or from an interview or statement from the show's writers/producers. It's ok to use the show or novels themselves to reference specific character actions/events/developments. I don't see any

1335:

is a franchise of stories that have appeared in print and as a television series. It is set in the Upper West Side of Manhattan and features characters that..." - something like that. The article itself has some pretty good background about all of this, but it's scattered around in the various

763:

4.249.84.191 How dare you remove my post under the pretext that its header was 'uncivil.' There was a more appropriate method of revising my comment - simply editing the header. To remove it, and without signing-in, was in such poor taste, revealing merely that your edit was based on personal

1330:

as an example. As it reads, the article would satisfy fans of the show, but still leaves a general and unfamiliar reader wanting more, such as background of the story/setting. I suggest beginning with a "Background" section, which briefly describes the setting and characters. Something like

1758:

The Manga series seems to stick out has not having enough to justify a separate major section. Perhaps a major section can be created called "Character in print", with subsections for the novels and the manga. I just think the Manga stuff doesn't warrant its own major section.

848:, or any major point for the article. It's not so much that but adding paragraphs (referenced or not) to the lead that can't seem to fit in the article shouldn't be happening. And tons of intricate detail in the season sections (especially 2) that could easily be removed. 1233:

I'll be reviewing this article, using the GA criteria, listed below. General responses, questions and comments to me can be made in this section. Responses to specific points in the review should be made in the review section below. Please sign all comments.

759:

character to be this long. Did any of you editors even notice this article was nominated for deletion in August 2008? And yet you continued to expand it. I'd really suggest a moratorium on expanding this article. --BasilSeal (talk) 12:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

1383:

I'm not satisfied with the background. Some was added to the novels section, but that comes later in the article. I'm talking about a general background about this series, to provide context for the character, not just an introduction to her. See

595:

And now that we've taken care of that: Are we putting Marcus and Blair as broken up? Considering that Marcus slept with Catherine and they both went to London, they seem pretty much broken up to me, but they never really talked, so...?

2784: 1471:

The bit about "controversy, and other matters" still needs to be rephrased, IMO. In the lead, be specific: "controversy about domestic violence" for example. "Other matters" is too vague. Be specific about what those other matters

822:

material, sources would need to be provided. I imagine that a reader of the books might be able to assist in that area, particularly when it comes to citing page numbers, or linking to articles which verify things. --

807:

Thanks for your input. I agree that improvements can be made in the areas you mentioned. Are you sure that references shouldn't ever be a lead section? Just curious, because I see them over in featured articles like

2734: 1638:

Can you please clarify which two, and clarify what you mean by "sketchy"? The links I'm clicking on are leading me to the destination. How does this fail to make the article "factually accurate and verifiable"? --

153: 2754: 948:

One other thing. I don't think it currently interrupts the two paragraphs describing her, because I've begun by mentioning the character's notability -- so the second paragraph is meant as a continuation. --

1388:

for an example of a nice background section for an article about an element in a series. This character doesn't need a background section that is as lengthy, but it would benefit from something more at the

2182: 2774: 932:

Not trying to edit war. I think it's notable enough to be in the lead (it doesn't happen with every television character, which makes her notable). Can you think of another way to integrate it there? --

971:

incarnations." "A privileged young woman born to..." is great, to put something in between those looks very random. Her lead section should tell about her, and some reception. This doesn't look right

1410:. I've taken some content from the opening paragraph, and moved it up to the first possible section. Hope that helps. This isn't really a "scenario"-driven story in the same manner as something like 2785:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120512052213/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2012/02/tvs-most-crushworthy---the-1-percenters-gossip-girl-stars-ed-westwick-and-leighton-meester-take-on-e.html

2764: 2744: 2788: 2624: 1917:

Some non-free images and one released image. All with rationales. Captions are OK - manga image could use some better, like "Blair as seen in the Manga series". However, all images need

2272: 1654:

webpages will have been archived there, and you can get a permanent link to the archived page, which solves the problem of using the original URL in the citation, which can succumb to

259: 2735:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110408165853/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/02/gossip-girls-leighton-meester-talks-dan-and-blair-i-think-theyre-good-for-each-other.html

2904: 2296: 2492: 2755:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110423083429/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/04/gossip-girl-the-kids-stay-in-the-picture-the-aftermath-of-dan-and-blairs-kiss.html

2242: 2738: 1367:

I added information about the setting to the opening paragraph. I think the rest of that section adequately introduces the character. Combined the sub-sections as well. --

1068:

According to the book she is protestant, but after her mother's conversion to Judaism, calls herself Jewish sometimes. Should she be under the category "Fictional Jews"? --

3028: 2183:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110120224442/http://sheepishfashionista.com:80/2010/10/05/sheepish-interview-with-cecily-von-ziegesar-inspired-creator-original-gossip-girl/

2775:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110507014356/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/05/gossip-girl-the-princesses-and-the-frog-blair-catches-royal-wedding-fever.html

2470: 147: 2758: 1622:

There are still some sketchy links - just click on the "external links" tool in the above right to see the link with tagged issues. A couple have no server response.

1177: 482: 2454: 3023: 2936: 2932: 2918: 2816: 2812: 2798: 2656: 2652: 2638: 2546: 2542: 2528: 2358: 2354: 2340: 2104: 2100: 2086: 2778: 1326:

The text of the article is pretty good, but I would like to see a re-structuring of the article, to reflect good practice of character articles. See the FA for

1144: 2436: 2186: 2306: 3038: 3033: 2765:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110507231323/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/05/gossip-girl-is-chuck-bass-abusive-ep-says-no-we-beg-to-differ.html

2745:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110324032322/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/02/gossip-girls-it-girl-happened-one-night-a-valentines-day-dair.html

1167: 2262: 3013: 2894: 430: 420: 2222: 2789:

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2012/02/tvs-most-crushworthy---the-1-percenters-gossip-girl-stars-ed-westwick-and-leighton-meester-take-on-e.html

1968:: This is quite a nice article, and just needs some additional work to bring it up to GA level. I'm putting it on hold until these improvements are made. 473: 453: 79: 2625:

https://web.archive.org/web/20100918190838/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2009/08/the-decades-best-television-characters-according-to-you.html

2232: 2768: 2748: 2273:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120511051125/http://www.zap2it.com:80/news/pictures/zap-tv-most-crushworthy-awards-pics,0,2089692.photogallery?index=21

3018: 2052: 716: 2252: 201: 2508: 2905:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080925053929/http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2008/09/22/gossip-girl-meester-tvs-hottest-star-kath-kim-a-bomb-fhm/

2297:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090613070511/http://www.mylifetime.com:80/lifestyle/beauty-style/celebrity-style/top-10-best-dressed-tv-characters

3003: 2628: 2480: 3008: 1918: 392: 85: 44: 2493:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081019191151/http://www.instyle.com/instyle/package/general/photos/0%2C%2C20164507_20057738_20371760%2C00.html

1608:

Removed the dead links, and threw in some replacements. As it stands, each of the links should verify the claims (unless I missed any). --

396: 2300: 2276: 2243:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120516112642/http://www.eonline.com:80/news/watch_with_kristin/gossip_girl_finale_redux_blair_chooses/316189

2739:

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/02/gossip-girls-leighton-meester-talks-dan-and-blair-i-think-theyre-good-for-each-other.html

3043: 2908: 1385: 1149: 219: 2471:

https://web.archive.org/web/20091223070026/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/golden_globes/golden_globes_2009_overlooked_1.php

1255: 730: 2502: 904:

About her gaining notability in regards to her wardrobe. It's very randomly placed, and interrupts the two paragraphs describing her

2914:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2794:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2634:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2524:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2496: 2202: 2192: 2759:

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/04/gossip-girl-the-kids-stay-in-the-picture-the-aftermath-of-dan-and-blairs-kiss.html

2998: 1890: 550: 383: 344: 2455:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110306192342/http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/im_ing_about_gossip_girl_rgTaVdXB87fbszlthtUVnM

2212: 2464: 2246: 1261: 1172: 207: 99: 30: 2779:

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/05/gossip-girl-the-princesses-and-the-frog-blair-catches-royal-wedding-fever.html

2474: 844:

should only be provided for things that need verifying and may be hard to find in the article, anything thing that falls into

615:

Since there still seem to be a few people defying this statement, I thought I'd essentially reiterate what's been said on the

1559: 1493:. I've altered that. Chose "physical abuse" over "domestic violence," as I don't believe the latter applied to the scene. -- 1216: 1073: 1058: 642: 104: 20: 2437:

http://sheepishfashionista.com/2010/10/05/sheepish-interview-with-cecily-von-ziegesar-inspired-creator-original-gossip-girl/

2187:

http://sheepishfashionista.com/2010/10/05/sheepish-interview-with-cecily-von-ziegesar-inspired-creator-original-gossip-girl/

168: 2307:

https://web.archive.org/web/20131002014214/http://www.tvguide.com:80/PhotoGallery/Fashionable-TV-Characters-1044392/1044402

135: 74: 2263:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110929121654/http://music.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx?blogentryid=288940&showcomments=true

2979: 2895:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120208070552/http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2011/07/25/gossip-girl-psycho-killer-exclusive/

2859: 2699: 2589: 2458: 2401: 2147: 1030: 982: 915: 859: 796: 712: 673: 319: 2223:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110718151414/http://tvovermind.zap2it.com/thecw/gossip-girl/gossip-girl-3-22-review/23886

541: 521: 65: 2233:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121231210617/http://www.tvguide.com:80/PhotoGallery/Best-Year-Moments-1039986/1039994

2769:

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/05/gossip-girl-is-chuck-bass-abusive-ep-says-no-we-beg-to-differ.html

2749:

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/02/gossip-girls-it-girl-happened-one-night-a-valentines-day-dair.html

2518: 2310: 2266: 2053:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120925233416/http://www.tvguide.com:80/PhotoGallery/Best-TV-Couples-1026715/1026739

1293: 1069: 1054: 2935:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2898: 2815:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2655:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2545:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2357:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2253:

https://web.archive.org/web/20101204132059/http://www.okmagazine.com/2008/09/ok-interview-leighton-meester-9072/

2103:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

631:, which is included as a source in the article, Cecily von Ziegesar verifies that Blair is her main character. 2226: 1575: 1093: 129: 2509:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110301202401/http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2008/04/welcome-back-go.html

764:

objections rather than content. That's a far greater violation of Knowledge rules than an 'uncivil header.'

2970: 2886: 2850: 2726: 2690: 2629:

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2009/08/the-decades-best-television-characters-according-to-you.html

2616: 2580: 2428: 2392: 2174: 2138: 2030: 1525: 1313: 708: 669: 109: 2481:

http://www.zap2it.com/news/pictures/zap-tv-most-crushworthy-awards-pics%2C0%2C2089692.photogallery?index=21

1432:

What about a copy edit? I think this article should have one, to help make the phrasing tighter throughout.

2882: 1195: 1191: 841: 734: 533: 515: 278: 125: 2236: 1089: 2954:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2942: 2834:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2822: 2674:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2662: 2564:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2552: 2376:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2364: 2256: 2122:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2110: 1582:] to get archived versions of links, if possible. This provides permanent access to the link's content. 645:

to it (such as calling the main character "one of the main characters") is not appropriate in Knowledge.

635: 325: 189: 2885:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2725:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2615:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2486: 2427:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2301:

http://www.mylifetime.com/lifestyle/beauty-style/celebrity-style/top-10-best-dressed-tv-characters#id=1

2277:

http://www.zap2it.com/news/pictures/zap-tv-most-crushworthy-awards-pics,0,2089692.photogallery?index=21

2173:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2056: 2029:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1108:

course, you can certainly nominate the article for GA status if you'd like. Thanks for the comment. --

2512: 2909:

http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2008/09/22/gossip-girl-meester-tvs-hottest-star-kath-kim-a-bomb-fhm/

2331: 2077: 704: 628: 175: 765: 1974: 769: 161: 55: 2503:

http://www.mylifetime.com/lifestyle/beauty-style/celebrity-style/top-10-best-dressed-tv-characters

549:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

481:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2497:

http://www.instyle.com/instyle/package/general/photos/0%2C%2C20164507_20057738_20371760%2C00.html

2290: 2284: 2040: 1982: 1926: 1865: 1829: 1764: 1714: 1663: 1627: 1587: 1477: 1437: 1394: 1348: 1239: 1226: 1210: 70: 2939:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2819:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2659:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2549:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2361:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2203:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110828065358/http://www.cwtv.com:80/shows/gossip-girl/episodes/102

2193:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110824071609/http://www.cwtv.com:80/shows/gossip-girl/episodes/101

2107:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2955: 2835: 2675: 2565: 2377: 2123: 1950: 1788: 1694: 1655: 1644: 1613: 1498: 1458: 1419: 1372: 1113: 998: 954: 938: 883: 827: 689: 654: 601: 375: 211: 51: 2213:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120122213350/http://www.cwtv.com/shows/gossip-girl/episodes/109

2465:

http://www.eonline.com/news/watch_with_kristin/gossip_girl_finale_redux_blair_chooses/316189

2247:

http://www.eonline.com/news/watch_with_kristin/gossip_girl_finale_redux_blair_chooses/316189

1880: 1301: 1025: 977: 910: 854: 791: 478: 2962: 2842: 2682: 2572: 2475:

http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/golden_globes/golden_globes_2009_overlooked_1.php

2384: 2130: 141: 388: 2921:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2801:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2641:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2531:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2343:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2089:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1805: 1297: 1265: 2961:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2841:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2681:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2571:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2383:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2129:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1977:

who I asked to copy edit the article. Everything looks good now. Passing the article.

2992: 2878: 2718: 2608: 2459:

http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/im_ing_about_gossip_girl_rgTaVdXB87fbszlthtUVnM

2448: 2442: 2420: 2216: 2206: 2196: 2166: 2022: 1978: 1922: 1904: 1861: 1825: 1760: 1710: 1659: 1623: 1583: 1473: 1433: 1390: 1344: 1309: 1305: 1235: 1206: 845: 24: 369: 2046: 1946: 1784: 1690: 1640: 1609: 1545: 1494: 1454: 1415: 1368: 1327: 1109: 1103:

Heh. Well, speaking as someone who's contributed -- thanks. :) Managed to help get

994: 950: 934: 879: 823: 813: 685: 668:

Add the ] image instead of the current image that has no visibility on her face. --

650: 597: 1243: 588:

Just cause I'm nice, I'll warn you: Spoilers for "The Ex-Files" in this section.

2928: 2808: 2648: 2538: 2350: 2096: 1340:

for romance, ambition, etc. Just combine it all into a single set of paragraphs.

1332: 1104: 1020: 972: 905: 849: 786: 624: 617: 465: 447: 391:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 2927:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2807:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2647:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2537:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2349:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2267:

http://music.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx?blogentryid=288940&showcomments=true

2095:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1709:

obvious issues with this, but the article's main contributers will know best.

365: 2899:

http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2011/07/25/gossip-girl-psycho-killer-exclusive/

2519:

http://www.tvguide.com/PhotoGallery/Fashionable-TV-Characters-1044392/1044402

2311:

http://www.tvguide.com/PhotoGallery/Fashionable-TV-Characters-1044392/1044402

2227:

http://tvovermind.zap2it.com/thecw/gossip-girl/gossip-girl-3-22-review/23886

1198:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 1088:

I keep wondering why Knowledge does not consider this as a good article.

809: 387:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about 2984: 2864: 2704: 2594: 2406: 2152: 1986: 1954: 1930: 1869: 1833: 1792: 1768: 1718: 1698: 1667: 1648: 1631: 1617: 1591: 1502: 1481: 1462: 1441: 1423: 1398: 1376: 1352: 1220: 1117: 1097: 1077: 1062: 1035: 1002: 987: 958: 942: 920: 887: 864: 831: 801: 773: 738: 720: 693: 677: 658: 605: 359: 338: 2257:

http://www.okmagazine.com/2008/09/ok-interview-leighton-meester-9072/

2237:

http://www.tvguide.com/PhotoGallery/Best-Year-Moments-1039986/1039994

2513:

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2008/04/welcome-back-go.html

2487:

http://www.tvguide.com/PhotoGallery/Best-TV-Couples-1026715/1026739

2057:

http://www.tvguide.com/PhotoGallery/Best-TV-Couples-1026715/1026739

1574:

Lots of link issues: dead links, sketchy redirects, etc. Go to the

1019:

Nice. I like it, now we need an expert to do the novel sections :)

546: 1053:

religious, but would she be considered "Jewish"? Just wondering.

1689:

the article. Please let me know if there are any that don't. --

1343:

So, get a copy edit before I check off 1a. Re-structure for 1b.

301: 15: 2291:

http://www.tvguide.com/PhotoGallery/Best-Dressed-TV-1680/2665

2316:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

2062:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

1414:, so background info isn't going to be quite as complex. -- 878:

but I think that I'll leave some of that task to others. --

700:

OK. I Got a NEw Image. I worked on it and now, here it is.

1860:

Seems relatively stable, and managed by a curating editor.

2889: