1221:). They slow down page load time, which is significant for people with slow connections. People in Bolivia or Paraguay who want to learn about this component of their fauna, who presumably don't have connections as fast as they are in the West, may indeed notice the difference. Then, as Aranae rightly notes, the use of cite templates complicates adding citations for people who don't know how to use the templates. You speak about the "minutiae of citation formatting", but using cite templates forces one to learn the minutiae of parameter names in those templates, and that is something much more important. If someone adds a citation here and adds a space after the colon in a journal citation, which is inconsistent with the style I used here, the citation is still functional and the only problem is a minor inconsistency in the citations, a small problem that is easily fixed. If on the contrary I don't remember the correct parameter name in a cite template, it breaks the citation. Thus, both formats require one to remember such minutiae, but the consequences of not remembering them are more severe for the cite templates. In general, I prefer not to use templates where they are not urgently required, because they make it more difficult for new users willing to improve Knowledge to do so. In addition (a minor point), the cite template style has several features that are inconsistent with the styles used in the scientific journals in the field.
1228:. Some of the footnotes refer to Percequillo et al., 2008, which is the IUCN account, but you have now disguised this reference as an external link, making it impossible to verify the conservation status from the information given in the article. The language text ("in Portuguese" etc.) is placed at different places in the citation in the several citations where it is used. This is apparently a problem with the templates themselves and not with your implementation, and it illustrates another problem: using complex templates instead of simple text makes it more difficult to achieve consistency on points like the place of the language label. Your edit created a problem in the Musser and Carleton, 2005 reference, where there are two periods behind the initials of DeeAnn Reeder. This illustrates the fact that even when using the citation templates, one has to remember minutiae, such as not putting a period at the end of the |editor= parameter. For some reason, you used the DOI for the Pardinas, 2008 reference, creating inconsistency with other citations where DOIs also exist. I gave my reasons for not using DOIs at
32:
202:
354:
65:
254:
233:
143:
1251:. I believe your changes objectively made the article worse; you probably disagree, but we should be able to agree that both the previous style and the one you proposed are permissible, so the style preferred by the primary contributor (me) is to be used. I am open to objective arguments why I am wrong on the above.
840:
I tried to make it clear by reviewing the histories of the two names it got in separate paragraphs and then reviewing their shared history in the third paragraph and beyond. I am happy to have this section improved; I want to have an article that is as good as possible and not merely one that is good
1213:
I can see two possible advantages for using the cite templates. One is that citation formats are consistent across many articles. But whether this is even desirable is dubious. Both the citation template format and the format I commonly use give the same information, just with different punctuation
1194:
In a format with an incredibly steep learning curve. Forcing editors to write this type of complex code to do the simplest (and most important) tasks really represents one of the biggest barriers to entry for experts who want to improve wikipedia. This type of formatting is not straightforward in
1074:
I think I addressed most of your concerns. The range map still needs to be added, though, and there are some places in the text where I may not quite have been able to solve the problems you saw. Also, the "Distribution and ecology" section has now become something of a catch-all; I'll need to find
882:
The problem was that
Oryzomyini was basically a collection of genera that some people thought looked pretty similar, without any phylogenetic justification. Voss didn't want to perpetuate that problem. I think it's too much for this article to explain that in detail. I'll try to think of a suitable
1399:
is not a "common name" in the technical sense of a name in the vernacular, but it is a "common name" in the sense of a name that is commonly used for the animal, and it is this second meaning of "common name" that is relevant to the policy. I don't have any interest at this point in a proposal to
1277:
Sorry if that is the case. I think my main point is in the paragraph "Summarizing, I find the disadvantages of using the cite templates much more persuasive than the advantages. The templates add needless complexity and require one to learn at least as many minutiae as just typing the references
1209:
Cybercobra, I wrote this article and added all its citation templates, and I find it much more convenient to just type out the citation than to use these templates and remember the names of all these parameters. Sure, there's probably some script that makes it easier, but all that is only adding
909:
It's a ridge on the molar, and some authors have considered its presence in oryzomyines and thomasomyines versus its absence in akodontines, phyllotines, and others to be very important. It is somewhat explained in the next sentences, but I agree that this may be made more clear. (Now done -
735:
I will begin reviewing this article. Please revert any changes I make where I inadvertently change the meaning. I often do small edits with edit summaries as explanations, so check them if you have trouble following why I might have done what I've done. I will post queries below.
1157:
Is there really a good reason for these citation templates? They make the references section a difficult-to-edit disaster of code. I've never understood why the trend in wikipedia is to intentionally make citing sources the most complex part of the process.
929:
section would be helpful, including alisphenoid strut, tegmen tympani, zygomatic plates, posterolateral palatal pits, anteroloph, posteroflexid. This might be a little tricky but a few words would be helpful. Inline references in paras 2 and 3 would be
1243:
You also split some of the references to multiple papers. Not only did this create some other problems (ref. 29 and 31 are currently identical), but it also makes the article less visually appealing by creating strings of consecutive ref
1239:
Summarizing, I find the disadvantages of using the cite templates much more persuasive than the advantages. The templates add needless complexity and require one to learn at least as many minutiae as just typing the references
1232:. Your current formatting creates needless text, because no one is interested (I hope) in seeing the DOI code. Just linking the title is more intuitive and economical, and this was the previous format. You placed the number of
832:
are tricky to navigate as there are quite alot of tricky taxonomic changes to include. Not a deal-breaker for GA but section might need tweaking for FAC. I have added a couple of commas here and there to see if it
1648:
1643:
1214:
and formatting. The second advantage consists of the COinS metadata. But these are rarely used at best, and it should be possible to generate these data automatically anyway even from non-templated citations.
984:
The article needs something on aspects of behaviour, including diet and hunting habits (if nothing is known, this needs recording), and breeding/nesting. Do we have any info on predators which eat it?
1638:
1229:
126:
46:
1494:
1294:
71:
1594:
Although this species is of "least concern", the only whole-organism photos are of other species. Surely there's a picture of this critter out there somewhere. --
767:
I can see your point, but note that the lead also includes the most important points about distribution, habitat, and morphology. What about adding the following:
1536:
1532:
1518:
688:
1377:
actually the literally most common name. There seems to be a problem between the most common meaning of "common name" and "common name" as a technical term.
1609:
The fraction of small South
American rodents for which we have photos is not that high, unfortunately. A fair amount of expertise is needed to identify them.
1495:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110531182826/http://www.avesargentinas.org.ar/cs/DESCARGABLES/Conservacion/ReservaElBagual/10-%20El%20Bagual%20-%20Mamiferos.pdf
1173:
On the contrary, the templates mean one doesn't need to remember the minutae of citation formatting, only fill in some fields. They also do neat stuff like
444:
1498:
1174:
304:
992:
As far as I know, nothing is known. It has been found in owl pellets from time to time, so that actually merits inclusion. I'll see what I can do.
1658:
758:
The lead should be a summary of salient points of the article. As it stands it seems to focus overly much on taxonomy (granted it is complicated!)
294:
164:
1663:
1381:
seems to be talking about the literally most common name. Perhaps a new guideline elsewhere to warn people of this important distinction.
1633:
372:
1224:
In this article, your use of the citation templates created several problems, which result in the article currently not fulfilling some
270:
1653:
1514:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1260:
I'm currently busy with other 'pedia tasks and the wall of text is rather off-putting, so I'm not going to make an issue of this. --
727:
412:
107:
455:
1599:
1121:
1096:
1064:
1053:
Overall, a bit of work to do. Good luck. I can't help with content but am free to answer questions and help out where I can.
747:
1445:
1373:
be amended? You don't really seem to be selectively violating it if your practice is to use taxon titling when the taxon
1017:
That is true. I have little experience with making such maps well; do you have any suggestions as to how best to do that?
873:
but declined to formally place it in
Oryzomyini in the absence of explicit phylogenetic justification of such a placement.
261:
238:
1236:
and some other papers within brackets, even though that is the most important piece of information for finding the paper.
1579:
677:
366:
213:
608:
41:
1499:
http://www.avesargentinas.org.ar/cs/DESCARGABLES/Conservacion/ReservaElBagual/10-%20El%20Bagual%20-%20Mamiferos.pdf
1210:
complexity and solving a non-existing problem, because I have no problem at all with just typing out the citations.
426:
418:
389:
1595:
1085:
Okay, I think we've reached GA level. I will update and post some further notes on the general talk page itself.
497:
393:
1535:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
628:
201:
175:
31:
1570:
1486:
566:
723:
669:
604:
531:
1504:
64:
1554:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1542:
652:
588:
518:
219:
157:
51:
1485:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1378:
1370:
1269:
1186:
1614:
1330:
1218:
465:
142:
269:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1453:
1428:
1386:
1352:
1338:
1314:
1115:
1090:
1058:
741:
1539:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1555:
938:
As you say, it is tricky. I will try to give some explanations for them and also add the refs.
942:
14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) (Now done, except for posteroflexid which was already explained -
584:
438:
379:
55:
17:
1405:
1360:
1279:
1252:
1200:
1163:
1143:
1076:
1035:
1018:
997:
993:
971:
957:
Certain bats are also smaller and paler in the Chaco region, which includes much of
Paraguay
943:
939:
911:
884:
842:
816:
793:
789:
663:
501:
485:
405:
1562:
1261:
1178:
648:
592:
551:
525:
477:
1351:
is a far more common name for this animal than "Brazilian False Rice Rat". See generally
1217:
There are also disadvantages for the use of citation templates (cf. recent discussion at
1225:
1610:
1521:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1420:
673:
539:
512:
469:
422:
401:
353:
1561:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1627:
1478:
1449:
1424:
1382:
1334:
1300:
1248:
1111:
1086:
1054:
862:
841:
enough for GA, and any suggestions you have for achieving that end would be welcome.
737:
596:
547:
505:
807:
Is there any more specific meaning by using the word "pelage" over "coat" or "fur"?
640:
636:
473:
781:
Some additional general morphology, perhaps body weight and relative tail length.
1528:
1401:
1356:
1196:
1159:
1027:
555:
493:
489:
397:
253:
232:
1527:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
644:
624:
612:
543:
461:
385:
1293:
My apologies for interposing here, but having just seen this I thought that
580:
448:
151:
730:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1030:, but of course that's copyrighted. Also, it appears to be incomplete, as
1134:
Some more clarification of technical terms. Another reader would be good.
656:
600:
576:
481:
1444:
Understood; you've done enough already, thanks. You may want to watch
865:. I added "of rodents" to "phyllotine group" now; is that clear enough?
632:
616:
572:
430:
1618:
1603:
1584:
1505:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627094911/http://www.iucnredlist.org/
1457:
1432:
1409:
1390:
1364:
1342:
1318:
1282:
1272:
1255:
1204:
1189:
1167:
1146:
1125:
1100:
1079:
1068:
1038:
1021:
1000:
974:
946:
914:
887:
845:
819:
796:
778:(webbing between the digits, reduction in complexity of the dentition)
751:
620:
559:
535:
266:
1423:. It could be a useful example to use in a reminder or caveat.
1034:
has also been recorded from
Misiones in northeastern Argentina.
966:
As an analogy: these species show the same kind of variation as
173:
Did you know ... that it was not realized for 70 years that the
1247:
Last, I would like to draw your attention to the principles in
1508:
195:
1137:
Some more thorough referencing (eg the chromosome sentence)
1649:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are featured articles
1644:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
1489:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1142:
Great, thanks! I added the karyotype ref and some others.
1329:
Why was it moved from "Brazilian False Rice Rat" despite
1295:
Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Wikipedia
Citation Style
1482:
1419:
The most popular article taxon-titled article might be
339:
334:
329:
324:
119:
100:
1639:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
265:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1531:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
959:- bats? I'm lost as to why bats are mentioned here.
70:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
150:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's
854:phyllotine and oryzomyine need some explanation.
760:I just added a sentence to finish the balancing.
1517:This message was posted before February 2018.
179:was described twice under two different names?
8:
54:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
50:as one of the best articles produced by the
44:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
445:List of literary accounts of the Pied Piper
1131:Range map (agree this is a tricky problem)
361:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
312:
227:
79:
26:
1477:I have just modified 2 external links on
1075:some more logical organization for that.
996:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) (Now done -
792:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) (Now done -
199:
229:
7:
970:does. I think I clarified that now.
259:This article is within the scope of
925:Some clarification of terms in the
770:Specific characters it shares with
218:It is of interest to the following
25:
1481:. Please take a moment to review
728:Talk:Brazilian False Rice Rat/GA1
1395:Yes, my argument is that though
883:replacement for it. (Now done -
352:
252:
231:
200:
141:
63:
30:
316:WikiProject Rodents to-do list:
299:This article has been rated as
1659:Low-importance Rodent articles
1:
1619:18:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
1604:17:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
1458:19:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1433:17:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1410:17:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1391:16:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1369:In light of all that, should
1365:14:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1343:03:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
279:Knowledge:WikiProject Rodents
273:and see a list of open tasks.
18:Talk:Brazilian False Rice Rat
1664:WikiProject Rodents articles
1319:00:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
1283:12:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
1273:12:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
678:Indian giant flying squirrel
282:Template:WikiProject Rodents
1634:Knowledge featured articles
1509:http://www.iucnredlist.org/
1256:11:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
1205:03:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
1190:03:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
1168:00:26, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
1147:23:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
1126:23:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
1101:23:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
1080:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
1069:13:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
1039:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
1022:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
1001:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
975:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
947:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
915:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
888:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
846:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
828:The first two paras of the
820:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
797:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
752:04:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
609:Argentine hemorrhagic fever
171:The text of the entry was:
1680:
1548:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1474:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1400:amend the policy, though.
1010:A range map would be nice.
899:mesoloph(id) on its molars
427:California ground squirrel
419:Bolivian hemorrhagic fever
390:Bolivian hemorrhagic fever
305:project's importance scale
127:Featured article candidate
1249:WP:MOS#General principles
1234:American Museum Novitates
498:Syrian hamster variations
311:
298:
247:
226:
186:
82:
78:
1654:FA-Class Rodent articles
1585:18:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
1325:Brazilian False Rice Rat
629:Black-tailed prairie dog
394:Campbell's dwarf hamster
176:Brazilian False Rice Rat
72:Today's featured article
1470:External links modified
605:Arctic ground squirrel
208:This article is rated
1049:References look okay.
670:Baird's pocket gopher
653:North American beaver
589:American red squirrel
532:Baird's pocket gopher
74:on February 16, 2019.
1596:Piledhigheranddeeper
1529:regular verification
784:Conservation status.
108:Good article nominee
1519:After February 2018
1297:may be of interest.
1175:generating metadata
875:- needs explaining.
861:Both are tribes of
466:Gambian pouched rat
262:WikiProject Rodents
52:Knowledge community
1573:InternetArchiveBot
1524:InternetArchiveBot
1353:User:Ucucha/Titles
1153:Citation templates
214:content assessment
83:Article milestones
1549:
713:
712:
709:
708:
705:
704:
701:
700:
697:
696:
585:Allegheny woodrat
194:
193:
136:
135:
120:December 16, 2009
16:(Redirected from
1671:
1583:
1574:
1547:
1546:
1525:
1315:talk to Ohms law
1267:
1195:any respect. --
1184:
502:The Rats (novel)
486:Plague (disease)
406:Guinea pig breed
367:Article requests
356:
349:
348:
313:
287:
286:
283:
280:
277:
256:
249:
248:
243:
235:
228:
211:
205:
204:
196:
189:Featured article
187:Current status:
145:
122:
103:
80:
67:
42:featured article
34:
27:
21:
1679:
1678:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1624:
1623:
1592:
1577:
1572:
1540:
1533:have permission
1523:
1487:this simple FaQ
1472:
1327:
1265:
1182:
1155:
1108:
1106:Onwards from GA
1026:The IUCN has a
722:This review is
718:
693:
649:Mountain beaver
593:Anatole (mouse)
552:Eurasian beaver
478:Mountain Beaver
429:(requested) •
344:
285:Rodent articles
284:
281:
278:
275:
274:
241:
212:on Knowledge's
209:
182:
181:
169:
118:
101:October 5, 2009
99:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1677:
1675:
1667:
1666:
1661:
1656:
1651:
1646:
1641:
1636:
1626:
1625:
1622:
1621:
1591:
1588:
1567:
1566:
1559:
1512:
1511:
1503:Added archive
1501:
1493:Added archive
1471:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1421:Marsupial Wolf
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1326:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1298:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1222:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1154:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1139:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1107:
1104:
1083:
1082:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
987:
986:
980:
979:
978:
977:
961:
960:
953:
952:
951:
950:
933:
932:
921:
920:
919:
918:
904:
903:
894:
893:
892:
891:
877:
876:
869:
868:
867:
866:
856:
855:
851:
850:
849:
848:
835:
834:
825:
824:
823:
822:
810:
809:
803:
802:
801:
800:
787:
786:
785:
782:
779:
762:
761:
733:
732:
717:
714:
711:
710:
707:
706:
703:
702:
699:
698:
695:
694:
692:
691:
689:photo requests
680:
674:Golden hamster
659:
562:
540:Black squirrel
521:
508:
470:Golden hamster
451:
434:
425:(requested) •
423:Least chipmunk
408:
402:Golden hamster
375:
360:
358:
357:
346:
343:
342:
337:
332:
327:
321:
318:
317:
309:
308:
301:Low-importance
297:
291:
290:
288:
271:the discussion
257:
245:
244:
242:Low‑importance
236:
224:
223:
217:
206:
192:
191:
184:
183:
170:
165:August 9, 2009
149:
148:
146:
138:
137:
134:
133:
130:
123:
115:
114:
111:
104:
96:
95:
92:
89:
85:
84:
76:
75:
68:
60:
59:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1676:
1665:
1662:
1660:
1657:
1655:
1652:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1642:
1640:
1637:
1635:
1632:
1631:
1629:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1589:
1587:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1575:
1564:
1560:
1557:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1544:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1520:
1515:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1479:Pseudoryzomys
1475:
1469:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1398:
1397:Pseudoryzomys
1394:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1379:WP:COMMONNAME
1376:
1372:
1371:WP:COMMONNAME
1368:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1349:Pseudoryzomys
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1296:
1292:
1284:
1281:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1152:
1148:
1145:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1117:
1113:
1110:Some notes -
1105:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1088:
1081:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1056:
1048:
1047:
1040:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1002:
999:
995:
991:
990:
989:
988:
985:
982:
981:
976:
973:
969:
968:Pseudoryzomys
965:
964:
963:
962:
958:
955:
954:
948:
945:
941:
937:
936:
935:
934:
931:
928:
923:
922:
916:
913:
908:
907:
906:
905:
902:
900:
896:
895:
889:
886:
881:
880:
879:
878:
874:
871:
870:
864:
863:Sigmodontinae
860:
859:
858:
857:
853:
852:
847:
844:
839:
838:
837:
836:
831:
827:
826:
821:
818:
814:
813:
812:
811:
808:
805:
804:
798:
795:
791:
788:
783:
780:
777:
773:
769:
768:
766:
765:
764:
763:
759:
756:
755:
754:
753:
749:
746:
743:
739:
731:
729:
725:
720:
719:
715:
690:
687:
685:
681:
679:
675:
671:
668:
666:
665:
660:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:Anomalomyidae
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
571:
569:
568:
563:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:Cypriot mouse
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
528:
527:
522:
520:
517:
515:
514:
509:
507:
506:Tree squirrel
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
458:
457:
452:
450:
446:
443:
441:
440:
435:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
415:
414:
409:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
382:
381:
376:
374:
371:
369:
368:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
350:
347:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
322:
320:
319:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
296:
293:
292:
289:
272:
268:
264:
263:
258:
255:
251:
250:
246:
240:
237:
234:
230:
225:
221:
215:
207:
203:
198:
197:
190:
185:
180:
178:
177:
167:
166:
161:
159:
158:Did you know?
153:
147:
144:
140:
139:
131:
129:
128:
124:
121:
117:
116:
112:
110:
109:
105:
102:
98:
97:
93:
90:
87:
86:
81:
77:
73:
69:
66:
62:
61:
57:
53:
49:
48:
43:
39:
38:Pseudoryzomys
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1593:
1571:
1568:
1543:source check
1522:
1516:
1513:
1476:
1473:
1418:
1396:
1374:
1348:
1331:WP:COMMONAME
1328:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1262:
1233:
1179:
1156:
1118:
1109:
1093:
1084:
1061:
1052:
1031:
983:
967:
956:
926:
924:
898:
897:
872:
829:
806:
775:
771:
757:
744:
734:
721:
683:
682:
662:
661:
641:Eligmodontia
637:Bobak marmot
565:
564:
524:
523:
519:Rodent stubs
511:
510:
474:Hamster ball
454:
453:
437:
436:
411:
410:
378:
377:
365:
364:
345:
300:
260:
220:WikiProjects
188:
174:
172:
163:
155:
125:
106:
56:please do so
45:
37:
1226:FA criteria
927:Description
724:transcluded
556:House mouse
494:Rat-catcher
490:Prairie dog
433:(requested)
398:Fancy mouse
1628:Categories
1580:Report bug
1448:, though.
1032:P. simplex
772:Holochilus
645:Guinea pig
625:Beaver dam
613:Armintomys
544:Chinchilla
462:Birbalomys
386:Beaver dam
162:column on
47:identified
1611:WolfmanSF
1563:this tool
1556:this tool
1028:range map
901:- a what?
716:GA Review
581:Ailuravus
449:Mousetrap
152:Main Page
1569:Cheers.—
1450:Chrisrus
1425:Chrisrus
1383:Chrisrus
1335:Chrisrus
1122:contribs
1112:Casliber
1097:contribs
1087:Casliber
1065:contribs
1055:Casliber
830:Taxonomy
776:Lundomys
748:contribs
738:Casliber
657:Tokudaia
601:Apodemus
577:Aethomys
482:Pacarana
210:FA-class
132:Promoted
1483:my edit
1278:does."
1230:the FAC
1219:WT:CITE
633:Blesmol
617:Batomys
573:Acouchi
431:Lemming
380:Cleanup
330:history
303:on the
276:Rodents
267:rodents
239:Rodents
154:in the
91:Process
1590:Photo?
1402:Ucucha
1357:Ucucha
1280:Ucucha
1270:(talk)
1253:Ucucha
1197:Aranae
1187:(talk)
1160:Aranae
1144:Ucucha
1077:Ucucha
1036:Ucucha
1019:Ucucha
998:Ucucha
994:Ucucha
972:Ucucha
944:Ucucha
940:Ucucha
912:Ucucha
885:Ucucha
843:Ucucha
833:helps.
817:Ucucha
794:Ucucha
790:Ucucha
664:Wikify
621:Beaver
567:Verify
560:Rabies
536:Beaver
526:Update
413:Expand
373:Drafts
216:scale.
113:Listed
94:Result
1266:cobra
1263:Cyber
1244:tags.
1240:does.
1183:cobra
1180:Cyber
930:good.
726:from
684:Other
513:Stubs
439:Merge
340:purge
335:watch
40:is a
1615:talk
1600:talk
1454:talk
1446:this
1429:talk
1406:talk
1387:talk
1361:talk
1339:talk
1201:talk
1177:. --
1164:talk
1116:talk
1091:talk
1059:talk
815:No.
774:and
742:talk
456:NPOV
325:edit
88:Date
1537:RfC
1507:to
1497:to
295:Low
1630::
1617:)
1602:)
1550:.
1545:}}
1541:{{
1456:)
1431:)
1408:)
1389:)
1375:is
1363:)
1355:.
1341:)
1333:?
1317:)
1308:*
1304:=
1299:—
1203:)
1166:)
1158:--
1124:)
1099:)
1067:)
750:)
676:•
672:•
655:•
651:•
647:•
643:•
639:•
635:•
631:•
627:•
623:•
619:•
615:•
611:•
607:•
603:•
599:•
595:•
591:•
587:•
583:•
579:•
575:•
558:•
554:•
550:•
546:•
542:•
538:•
534:•
504:•
500:•
496:•
492:•
488:•
484:•
480:•
476:•
472:•
468:•
464:•
447:•
421:•
404:•
400:•
396:•
392:•
388:•
1613:(
1598:(
1582:)
1578:(
1565:.
1558:.
1452:(
1427:(
1404:(
1385:(
1359:(
1337:(
1313:(
1310:R
1306:I
1302:V
1199:(
1162:(
1119:·
1114:(
1094:·
1089:(
1062:·
1057:(
1003:)
949:)
917:)
890:)
799:)
745:·
740:(
686::
667::
570::
529::
516::
459::
442::
416::
383::
370::
307:.
222::
168:.
160:"
156:"
58:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
