Knowledge

Talk:Pseudoryzomys/GA1

Source 📝

195:
I tried to make it clear by reviewing the histories of the two names it got in separate paragraphs and then reviewing their shared history in the third paragraph and beyond. I am happy to have this section improved; I want to have an article that is as good as possible and not merely one that is good
429:
I think I addressed most of your concerns. The range map still needs to be added, though, and there are some places in the text where I may not quite have been able to solve the problems you saw. Also, the "Distribution and ecology" section has now become something of a catch-all; I'll need to find
237:
The problem was that Oryzomyini was basically a collection of genera that some people thought looked pretty similar, without any phylogenetic justification. Voss didn't want to perpetuate that problem. I think it's too much for this article to explain that in detail. I'll try to think of a suitable
264:
It's a ridge on the molar, and some authors have considered its presence in oryzomyines and thomasomyines versus its absence in akodontines, phyllotines, and others to be very important. It is somewhat explained in the next sentences, but I agree that this may be made more clear. (Now done -
90:
I will begin reviewing this article. Please revert any changes I make where I inadvertently change the meaning. I often do small edits with edit summaries as explanations, so check them if you have trouble following why I might have done what I've done. I will post queries below.
284:
section would be helpful, including alisphenoid strut, tegmen tympani, zygomatic plates, posterolateral palatal pits, anteroloph, posteroflexid. This might be a little tricky but a few words would be helpful. Inline references in paras 2 and 3 would be
187:
are tricky to navigate as there are quite alot of tricky taxonomic changes to include. Not a deal-breaker for GA but section might need tweaking for FAC. I have added a couple of commas here and there to see if it
339:
The article needs something on aspects of behaviour, including diet and hunting habits (if nothing is known, this needs recording), and breeding/nesting. Do we have any info on predators which eat it?
73: 122:
I can see your point, but note that the lead also includes the most important points about distribution, habitat, and morphology. What about adding the following:
69: 54: 46: 347:
As far as I know, nothing is known. It has been found in owl pellets from time to time, so that actually merits inclusion. I'll see what I can do.
113:
The lead should be a summary of salient points of the article. As it stands it seems to focus overly much on taxonomy (granted it is complicated!)
451: 419: 408:
Overall, a bit of work to do. Good luck. I can't help with content but am free to answer questions and help out where I can.
102: 372:
That is true. I have little experience with making such maps well; do you have any suggestions as to how best to do that?
228:
but declined to formally place it in Oryzomyini in the absence of explicit phylogenetic justification of such a placement.
62: 440:
Okay, I think we've reached GA level. I will update and post some further notes on the general talk page itself.
39: 445: 413: 96: 23: 17: 293:
As you say, it is tricky. I will try to give some explanations for them and also add the refs.
297:
14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) (Now done, except for posteroflexid which was already explained -
431: 390: 373: 352: 348: 326: 312:
Certain bats are also smaller and paler in the Chaco region, which includes much of Paraguay
298: 294: 266: 239: 197: 171: 148: 144: 441: 409: 217: 196:
enough for GA, and any suggestions you have for achieving that end would be welcome.
92: 162:
Is there any more specific meaning by using the word "pelage" over "coat" or "fur"?
136:
Some additional general morphology, perhaps body weight and relative tail length.
382: 455: 434: 423: 393: 376: 355: 329: 301: 269: 242: 200: 174: 151: 106: 385:, but of course that's copyrighted. Also, it appears to be incomplete, as 220:. I added "of rodents" to "phyllotine group" now; is that clear enough? 133:(webbing between the digits, reduction in complexity of the dentition) 389:
has also been recorded from Misiones in northeastern Argentina.
321:
As an analogy: these species show the same kind of variation as
81: 50: 314:- bats? I'm lost as to why bats are mentioned here. 209:phyllotine and oryzomyine need some explanation. 115:I just added a sentence to finish the balancing. 8: 430:some more logical organization for that. 351:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) (Now done - 147:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) (Now done - 7: 325:does. I think I clarified that now. 280:Some clarification of terms in the 125:Specific characters it shares with 31: 24:Talk:Brazilian False Rice Rat/GA1 238:replacement for it. (Now done - 1: 456:23:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 435:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 424:13:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 394:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 377:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 356:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 330:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 302:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 270:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 243:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 201:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 183:The first two paras of the 175:14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 152:20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 107:04:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 471: 365:A range map would be nice. 254:mesoloph(id) on its molars 404:References look okay. 139:Conservation status. 230:- needs explaining. 216:Both are tribes of 18:Talk:Pseudoryzomys 22:(Redirected from 462: 86: 77: 58: 27: 470: 469: 465: 464: 463: 461: 460: 459: 381:The IUCN has a 67: 44: 38: 36: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 468: 466: 438: 437: 406: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 367: 366: 362: 361: 360: 359: 342: 341: 335: 334: 333: 332: 316: 315: 308: 307: 306: 305: 288: 287: 276: 275: 274: 273: 259: 258: 249: 248: 247: 246: 232: 231: 224: 223: 222: 221: 211: 210: 206: 205: 204: 203: 190: 189: 180: 179: 178: 177: 165: 164: 158: 157: 156: 155: 142: 141: 140: 137: 134: 117: 116: 87: 35: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 467: 458: 457: 453: 450: 447: 443: 436: 433: 428: 427: 426: 425: 421: 418: 415: 411: 403: 402: 395: 392: 388: 384: 380: 379: 378: 375: 371: 370: 369: 368: 364: 363: 357: 354: 350: 346: 345: 344: 343: 340: 337: 336: 331: 328: 324: 323:Pseudoryzomys 320: 319: 318: 317: 313: 310: 309: 303: 300: 296: 292: 291: 290: 289: 286: 283: 278: 277: 271: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 255: 251: 250: 244: 241: 236: 235: 234: 233: 229: 226: 225: 219: 218:Sigmodontinae 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 207: 202: 199: 194: 193: 192: 191: 186: 182: 181: 176: 173: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 160: 159: 153: 150: 146: 143: 138: 135: 132: 128: 124: 123: 121: 120: 119: 118: 114: 111: 110: 109: 108: 104: 101: 98: 94: 88: 85: 84: 80: 75: 71: 66: 65: 61: 56: 52: 48: 43: 42: 33: 25: 19: 448: 439: 416: 407: 386: 338: 322: 311: 281: 279: 253: 252: 227: 184: 161: 130: 126: 112: 99: 89: 82: 78: 64:Article talk 63: 59: 40: 37: 282:Description 51:visual edit 387:P. simplex 127:Holochilus 383:range map 256:- a what? 34:GA Review 452:contribs 442:Casliber 420:contribs 410:Casliber 185:Taxonomy 131:Lundomys 103:contribs 93:Casliber 74:history 55:history 41:Article 432:Ucucha 391:Ucucha 374:Ucucha 353:Ucucha 349:Ucucha 327:Ucucha 299:Ucucha 295:Ucucha 267:Ucucha 240:Ucucha 198:Ucucha 188:helps. 172:Ucucha 149:Ucucha 145:Ucucha 285:good. 83:Watch 16:< 446:talk 414:talk 170:No. 129:and 97:talk 70:edit 47:edit 454:) 422:) 105:) 72:| 53:| 49:| 449:· 444:( 417:· 412:( 358:) 304:) 272:) 245:) 154:) 100:· 95:( 79:· 76:) 68:( 60:· 57:) 45:( 26:)

Index

Talk:Pseudoryzomys
Talk:Brazilian False Rice Rat/GA1
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Casliber
talk
contribs
04:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Ucucha
Ucucha
20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Ucucha
14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Ucucha
14:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Sigmodontinae
Ucucha
20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Ucucha
20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Ucucha
Ucucha
20:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Ucucha

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.