Talk:Brown (racial classification)

2630:(blacks) "Arab" and there is a similar practice amongst most ethnic Persians (and the Azeri/Iranians).A great number of Arabs, town dwellers, Farmers as well as Beduins have some degree of subsaharan and Indian admixture.Some Arabs do have a fair colour and do resemble Eastern Greeks or Turks. These are from the Levant.They are also known as Adnani or arabized Arabs.When I say Arabs, I mean it for peninsular Arabia (Khaleeji/Yemeni Arab), some of which also live in the Levant, Syria and North Africa and Egypt.The other use of the word Arab is to describe anybody that speaks Arabic or whoever is from an Arab Country .By the medieval Arabic view, any Chinese or Native American would have been called "white" because if you where not very very black, you where white.Today it is however different.The cause was the colonial period as well as the expulsion from Spain on racial and sectarian grounds.The only country that lists Arabs as "white" but excludes Pakistani's from being white is the USA.While the common white Americans do not accept Arabs as white at all.Arabized Canaanites, Christian Arabs, Assyrians and Arab Armenians and Cherkess people from Lebanon and Syria have fought for "whiteness" in order to naturalize in the US.Some Arabs feel this labeling of Arabs as white in the US only is being done to pave the way for "greater Israel" and claiming the achievements of ancient civilizations as that of white people.Hence these Labels and categories are looked upon with suspicion.Arabs back in their native lands feel good as a brown people, not to white, not to black, just brown. Arabs are aware of fine differences between people from the Subcontinent and themselves.These are not so much by colour of skin, but by shape of eye sockets, eyes, and nose as well as cultural differences. Arabs tend to have small button eyes and small fingernails, in contrast to Indians who often have very big eyeballs and often triangular noses.Skin colour is mostly the same or similar.Some Indians, such as Pathans, Kashmiris or Brahmins look more white then Arabs.Same with ethnic Persian Iranians and Kurds.( 310: 289: 2566:

expected due to exposure to the sun, as the article states, show a skin pigmentation in unexposed areas similar or even lighter than that of Northern Europeans (see page 18). Spaniards have an observed reflectance of around 65. For a comparison, Namibians have around 22-25, North Africans (Tunisians) around 56 (Morrocans) around 54, in Japan 55. What about Europe?. In London it is 62, darker than in Spain, although in other areas of the UK it is slightly lighter at 66.In Ireland 64-65. In Belgium 63, again darker than in Spain. So much for so much ignorance about the subject, that seems very common in this Anglosphere full of people who think that Spaniards or other Southern Europeans are like Mexicans. Funny they do not think that Jamaicans are not like the British. PS. It should be mentioned, though, that pale skin is considered unattrative in Spain and that most people will almost kill to get some colour or a good tan, in the beaches or in even using sunbeds. In fact most people do not consider pale skin attractive. On the other hand brown skin is considred much more attractive nowadays, a fact that people here seem to ignore, although when white people get brown we call it getting a tan. The information is there, in any case. Jan.

2611:

times.They need to be included in "brown people" and there needs to be a sub category for African brown people (Ethiopian Semites and Cushites, The Beja people, Somalis, Tuareg, Fulani) even though they would probably labeled black in the US due to their silly one drop rule.Not all "Sub Saharan peoples" are black. I know that some Lebanese Christians are opposed to that, but why bother? You aren't even Arabs and most of you do not self identify as Arabs but as Phoenicians or Canaanites.You just sdopted Arabic language.However, Canaanites got the near white looks, because they are a mixed race people themselves (mixed with Greeks, Armenians, Georgians & other peoples from the Caucasus region, Crusaders, Anatolians, Turks.....etc). Please don't mistake the "Arab concept of white" with actual "white". According to Arab concept of white, if you are not blueish black - you are white - In Sudan they say - if your dental gums are pink - you are white.....so this is meaningless.Most probably, ancient Chinese and Japanese did consider themselves as white.Until they where told they were members of the Mongolian race (Mongolians = their trad. enemies).

2760:

the fact that Spaniards, Italians or Greeks may actually be brown and not white, thus being a non white race. This is especially the case in the US, where people call anyone who speaks Spanish, Spanish. Well, Spaniards and Southern Europeans in general, and there are always exceptions like in all places, have virtually of the same skin pigmentation as other Northern Europeans. Of course if one visits Spain in the winter and sees with an objective eye they will see this fact at once. In the summer people like to tan. It is the official sport. Still the former can be seen as well. On the other hand the sun shines strongly and tanning is common for anyone who is outdoors, and southern Europeans love being outdoor, again, when it comes to natural skin pigmentation without the effects of tanning, they are as light skinned as anyother Europeans. See the only objective and scientific study carried out in the 21st century about skin pigmentation. Here you can find information about the Spanish, as Southern Europeans, and many other nations.

3590:. This led to one of the most notable hate crimes against Sicilian Americans, which was the trial of nineteen Sicilian immigrants for the murder of New Orleans police chief David Hennessy in 1890, which trial ended in the lynching of eleven of them by a white vigilante group. A quote on the condition of Sicilian's in the south from Prof Joseph Conte's 'A man named Cody - and the "passing" of a Sicilian in New Orleans states "Francesca and Antonio DeCorti soon left New Orleans to work in Louisiana’s sugar cane fields, where Sicilian immigrants commonly replaced black slave labor. As freed slaves and their descendants left the cane plantations for more promising work in cities such as St. Louis or Chicago in the late nineteenth century, the exhausting manual labor of cutting cane fell to the newest arrivals from southern Europe. Sicilians were not only replacement labor for the departing Negroes, they were treated to the same brand of justice as the freed slaves. In Louisiana in 1905" <ref: --> 1767:

as 'brown', much less any population group" (or indeed, "the designation of 'brown people' does not necessarily correspond to actual brownness of their actual skin" (i.e. people with a predominant skin colour which in most other contexts would be described as "brown" are not necessarily so designated, and equally, vice versa)), is there no clearer way of putting this that reflects whatever-it-is the source saying? The undoubted fact that there is always going to be more in the source than in the summary thereof does not mean that such summaries should be mystifying easter eggs, which it's not possible to query without being told to go "read the source".

3591: 2004:, since the term's ontological status (is anyone "objectively" a "white person"; why does this fact change when I move them from Brazil to the United States to Finland?) is in serious question. But by Knowledge's naming convention the more common, but formally applicable (and not insulting) naming should go with the concept. Here, each of the separate meanings, and I don't think you can disagree that they're separate since the article says as much, have their own perfectly valid names (though I also think we need to be quite upfront about the fact that "Australoid race" and "Malayan race" are concepts, not material realities).-- 1689:

or olive-skinned "whites" and self-identified "black "people) than people who can be observed as literally white or literally black for instance), so it needs much more explanation than the unclarifying wikilink and figleaf reference note currently offered (Race is one of the most written about topics in sociology, social/cultural anthropology, cultural studies, sociobiology,political science etc etc, we shouldn't just use one source for such a sweeping statement) The term may be overworked or disputed in many cases, but this is not necessarily mean it totally lacks any direct correspondence with actual skin color whatsoever.

1709:." (Forbes' emphasis). The second and third are from page 99: "The practical problem is that we cannot know what a Spaniard of 1560 meant by 'stewed quince' color or what an Italian of 1530 meant by 'olive-ish' color. Nor can we know if there was any agreement among people about such terms or, more importantly, about the colors in the mind conjured up by such terms." A lot of arguments on this talk page, including the above (which, ironically, talks about "sun-tanned" and "olive-skinned"), are based upon not actually reading what the source materials actually have to say, and what scholars have written, on this subject. I 3592:

https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/56606202/Man_Called_Cody_IALC.pdf?1526774821=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DA_Man_Called_Cody_Race_and_the_Passing_o.pdf&Expires=1618052397&Signature=YLNbS0sTLKVz9be8wa4DXlnDTk170UrMay8iuSEKW3pUK76k0kAo7mpgjyoWjzcDlI-jkfXUWWTwtiV3-vzRxCkfFpsEwLNYt0LIG8dJfRgab5qMfGGs-fqRaqFRfTe~QOKq4ofGK8YfGixDkPjVpUVoCU9ZwsNcIGZnmKGtbtpKvqJNHnMIQ4iQqO6Pj3pXalpd9dFy4MPYRFPPdnrlQYRzEVqOZ7pFgq8ZVeDN5k9uulB8vbvBQGOXqg3-KAqFnSs6dxhaENDZpPMkl6RjxvPflGTGjwnwyTEsvyjvTmdACL4zILctdzZRYqj~vwr2WU2Z6AkMpkSGPVz5sxsLvg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

3352:

white or black skin makes you black. What?! If anyone with brown skin is brown, then according to logical reasoning, Chinese, Koreans, Mongolians, and Japanese are white because they have white skin. Also, brown skin is common in South Europe (Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, Cyprus, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia, etc.). Are you going to start calling these people brown? There are Anglo Saxons living in the America-South (e.g Alabama) for centuries that have developed brown skin due to the heat of the sun rays there. Are they brown, too? No.

1366:"In the middle of the nineteenth century, the racialist theories of Arthur de Gobineau and others spread through Europe. The presence of blacks and "lower quality" immigrant groups made racialist thinkers discount the potential of the United States. The infinite mixing of America would lead to the ultimate degeneracy. Gobineau said that America was creating "greatest mediocrity in all fields: mediocrity of physical strength, mediocrity of beauty, mediocrity of intellectual capacities - we could almost say nothingness." 2933:"Generally, among different times (mostly in both Empire of and First Republic of Brazil), people with evident non-European ancestry (i.e. non-Caucasian features perceptible in a multiracial phenotype) were regarded as brancos ("whites") when social status of such person improves, and people from "fully non-white" categories were regarded as pardos ("browns"), trying to minimize their visible non-European ancestry to make them sound more "civilizated" and noble human beings and citizens" 2462:

in a number of ways. There is no reason in line with the policies of wikipedia that this article should be deleted. The anthropological usages alone justify that the term was used in early attempts to classify world populations based on physical characteristics and the fact that the term continues to be used, even adopted by some cultures in a way to redefine it as something of pride in some cases gives it standing in its own right as a independent article.

1285:

teacher and I am the student. This might fit your aggressive pursuit of this article as uncriticisable but its not how we do things here. As long as this article remians rascist OR I will continue to criticise it. If you banned criticism of articles on their talk pages we would have no possibility of imporoving articles bvut fortunately only Jimbo Wales could do this (and trhen everyone would leave and there would be no more wikipedia)

2870: 1947:. According to the simplistic way in which you've chosen to view this article, each of those could easily fall under the same umbrella. Instead, I ask you to review the Historical concepts section that you've minimalized. This term was part of a five-color system of physical anthropology created during the Age of Enlightenment. There is far more to this article than is covered in those other articles and you are not applying 1633:(edit conflict with LSLM) The problem is the article exists even though the concept is a minority rascist one. How we deal with this huge problem is indeed a tricky one. I think the way Ju and Uncle G remove any statements, sourced or otherwise that they disagree with while insisting that there own unsourced statements stand is very sad. Trying to give respectability to a minority rascist concept will not serve wikipedia, 399: 2646: 378: 1670:

of examples of people whose brownness happens to have caught the attention of someone else is not making for an NPOV article, however allegedly well referenced (it takes more than referencing to make a good encyclopedic article and a bad article can be well referenced). If you refuse to discuss with other editors and instead insult them (straw men) then we have reached an impasse so I woulsd advise you to change tack,

258: 859:. On the one hand you have 2000 mostly English pages talking about people with the name "Bryn", on the other hand mostly Afrikaans pages, of which several use "bruin" for denoting a person's skin color or race. Add "swart" (black) and "wit" to your query and it becomes more obvious. The Afrikaans Knowledge even has no pages containing "bryn", but several with "bruin": 1744:. This guy would also qualify as "brown" in the sense of "mixed race". Now that source is actually plausible if viewed in the context of Wittgenstein's philosophy, who wanted to challenge the ingrained perception of language, but taken out of context it's wrong. Many people have a skin color that falls into the spectrum of brown, including blacks and some whites.-- 229: 201: 3506: 2981:. I have never ever heard the expression "brown people" before. There is no other article for "brown people" in any other languages in Knowledge except for Swedish, which proves that the subject of the article is globally unheard-of and nonexistent. This article is racist, US-biased, and has no scientific foundation. I call for deletion. 2801:

southern Asia". Not only was southern Europe never included under the term, even the southern Mediterranean was mostly included under "Caucasian". Since at no point does the article include "Spaniards, Italians or Greeks" under "brown", it is difficult to see why you are trying to establish they shouldn't be. Perhaps you are confusing

469: 3412:

absolutely no connection we have with Latin America, and if we allow racist Americans to dictate whose brown, then others will too want to be considered brown for their brown skin and it wont stop, and saying "I am brown" will mean nothing knowing that there's no real regional connection or ancestry, only similar skin complexion.

898:, and the further reading that it cites, will tell you the dangers of using Google as a test of correct spelling. If you doubt the existence and reliablility of the sources cited, which are books, then you are free to click on the linked ISBNs and confirm their existence for yourself with a large number of book sources. 2410:

happier then if there were also articles for red and yellow people, these are certainly equal concepts to that of brown people, by singling out brown people I am concerned that wikipedia is actually distorting reality (even though unintentionally) and giving validity to brown people as a racial concept,

3351:

Just because many Latin Americans have brown skin does not mean they are brown. That is so silly...and pathetic. You guys needs to read up on geography and anthropology to be less ignorant on this. Racism is derived from ignorance. Saying brown skin makes you brown is like saying white skin makes you

3347:

Now, let me get some points across. We're willing to consider the Middle East as brown, because there are a lot of geographical and cultural connections; they are adjacent to South Asia and Islam has a significant influence to South/Southeast Asian culture. Latin America, on the other hand, does not.

2838:

Well, you have it right under historical concepts. If those historical concepts are mentioned (all of them influenced by Nordicist propaganda) why not state that some of those groups are proven to be even lighter than many Britons and English by modern science? Some of these articles rely too much on

2778:

So, this is reality when confronted to science, nothing more, nothing less. (You can also find in the thread the typical comments by idiots who seem shocked before facts) People should start getting an education on this issues. As you can see as well, skin pigmentation in areas of the Middle East and

2461:

What you often refer to your own family as is not the point of the article. The point of the article is to give the historic and current usages of the term. It does so in a neutral and verifiable way. To not have this article would be to deny that this notable term existed, exists, and was/is used

2213:

I don't think that "the historical concept is strongly related to the modern concept still in use by the IBGE and others" for two reasons: the anthropological "races" were regionally defined and based on ancestry, and the Brazilian definition is based on skin phenotype and need not even be inherited.

1669:

I have a firm commitment to NPOV, that's why I tagged the article. Turning even minor sociological subject matter into an article on people who are brown and then filling it with ridiculous, highly lunatic fringe ideas such as that there are no brown people, and then to contradict that with all sorts

1658:

rather than from a neutral point of view for the benefit of this article. Both of you continue to point out your blatant lack of disregard for neutrality ("...minority racist concept...", "...(editors) want to impose...twisted and strange ideas on race...") on these topics rather than comprehend the

1579:

This is also not true. Do a Google search for "Brown people" and you'll find hundreds of references just the same as the usage of "white people" or "black people", nevermind the fact that this all stems formally from the 5-color classification system by one of the original physical anthropologists.

1568:

The term brown doesnt really exist in the way it does with white and black people, which is why this article should be deleted or if not redirected to people, and why this article doesnt do anything other than to stir up conflict. The idea that we are giving an encyclopedic definition of brown people

1511:

I deleted it because it is unsourced PoV and not applicable to an article on "Brown people". Furthermore, similar comments on using the color "brown" is already available in the article just prior to where you were adding it. Except those comments are sourced and don't try to attribute the original

812:

The source, which is a study of such words, spells the words as they are written, and contains no occurrences at all (in 500 pages) of the words that you give. Please cite an equally good source for the spelling that you are claiming. Similarly, the sentence fragment quoted is based upon Adhikari's

801:

referred to in this article. The phrase "who were largely, and erroneously, believed to have been the production of black-white sexual union out of wedlock" -- what exactly does it suggest? Also, in Afrikaans, one uses the diphtong "ui" instead of "y" in the words "bruin", "bruines" and "bruinmense".

722:

You may not think that it is an academic subject. There are currently 15 cited sources that disagree with you. I have made no claim about the existence of brown people, incidentally. As I wrote below, please stop constructing straw men. As for what many black people think they are: You have cited

3411:

The brown race exists and it is included in the region I stated (MESA region). Primarily in South/Southeast Asia, and although many will disagree that Middle East is brown, if they want to be brown there's many of us are willing to accept them since there's similar culture, but that's it. There's is

3372:

So now you are probably wondering, if Latin America is not brown, what would you refer them as. I have done a lot of research myself, and very few Latin Americans actually call themselves brown, it's really just racist Americans trying to lump them in this category. According to 2010 U.S Census, 53%

3368:

Nothing against Latin America, but they have nothing to do with MESA culture, they are tens of thousands of miles away from us, so we literally have no connection to them. If you are going to call Latin America, and everyone else you don't like in America, brown, then that nullifies the racial value

2629:

I agree with you on Middle Easterners, but at least Arabs do consider themselves as brown, especially when living amongst Westerners but also back home,and are considered brown by most people in the World, incl. America (regardless of the US Census).Turks from Turkey do call people of African decent

2371:

if you ask these guys but not those guys and if you ask X people, it depends on if they came from Y heritage or Z heritage...". This article is not in need of a disambig nor is it unencyclopedic. The concept is a part of a historical system of classification of physical anthropology that maintains

1756:

There are not people who are literally white. The term white has been ingrained in some people's minds to see "white" people that they distort facts in an incredible way. White is a white piece of paper, or a white shirt. In fact it could be said that most people are some shade of brown. Some users

1688:

which is offered up as explanation doesn't help - it specifically says that human skin tone ranges "from dark brown to nearly colorless".) Such a statement seems to defy everyday observation (there are many more people who can be observed as literally brown in skin colour tone - including sun-tanned

1601:

That is false, PoV, and not applicable. Plenty of civilizations have ways of describing themselves from other civilizations based on physical traits like skin tone. Your comments are that you have an opinion on how white people treat others and you want that opinion known in an article on the term

1420:

classification" . This is unsourced and looks like OR to me as there is not the concept of brown people that there is of white and black people, in that sense brown people are like red people and yellow people, so you need a source for every claim within this sentence to put it back in its entirety,

606:

Your user page is irrelevant, as is who I have looked at. If you want this article to put forward the thesis that all people are brown, then you must provide a source for that thesis. The article currently has a source that states unequivocally that "brown people are not brown". Therefore that is

3369:

it has, and brown no longer becomes a race but an ambiguous group of people with a generally darker complexion (brown). Southeast Asians are well aware of Western countries. They dump their waste in our oceans and now won't even let us have our own racial group where we can be culturally connected.

1766:

This is indeed a weird and deeply unclear sentence, whether or not Colfax and Sternberg say this, and whether they do so in as many words, or otherwise. Given the large semantic difference between "no person is any shade of brown", and "it is simplistic and misleading to describe any single person

1370:

I do not need to say what a racist charlatan this Gobineau was or what stuff all these Nazi websites are made of, but following the arguments that I can see here, why should we speak of Americans as white people at all, if white people live mainly in Europe, with a population of 728 million people,

1182:

it surely implies it for three reasons: (1) It says that "Americans" refer to mestizos and Hispanics as brown people. (2) It doesn't acknowledge that this is wrong at more than one level. One editor claimed this was addressed in the introduction of the article, but this is not the case, as even if

938:

mense wat Afrikaans as moedertaal praat." ("Furthertmore, there are 2,9 million brown people who speak Afrikaans as their mother tongue") - Kriel, M. Approaches to Multilingualism in Language Planning and Identity Politics–A Critique. School of Language, Media and Communication, University of Port

877:

speech was given in anniversary of the Afrikaans Language Monument in South Africa. I'm going to guess that when they use the word "bruin" in the context of honoring a monument to the language, then they probably got it right (it's also housed on the government' website so it should be reliable).

761:

Agree, this is an entirely unnecessary and contradictory fork that does no more than make wikipedia a laughing stock and unreliable source of info amongst those who arent racially obsessed, which Americans clearly are and seeme to want to impose their racial theories on the rest of the world. Shame

707:

This is not an academic subject. What, you think we'll rely on your word for that? The article starteed as troll bait and what has changed? Are there any people who study brown people (who you on the one hand claim dont exisdt anyway)? Stop throwing WP articles at me which I am at least as familiar

3699:

True though, I mean that assertion is verifiable. The disambiguator as "Brown (racial classification)" blends part of the documented structural terminology of historically racist states and social systems with the reactionary appropriation to ethnic identity according to media reports within those

3633:

Thanks for replying. I didn't want to overburden you with work looking for sources, but I still have my doubts regarding the sources. The "Brown v. Board of Educuation" doesn't show that Sicilians were called "brown" (I hope you noticed that it is not named for "Brown America" but for a man called

3581:

There is also a great example In certain parts of the South during the Jim Crow era, Sicilians, were affected by its discriminatory policies. The reason Sicilians were much more prone to racial discrimination than other Mediterranean groups (such as Northern Italians or Greeks) was due to the fact

3573:

The Brown vs. Board of Education article states how Sicilians were effected the same as other non White Americans, from the article it states "Blacks were not the only ones affected... Latinos in Denver, Hispanics in New York City, and Sicilians in New Jersey were also affected." This confirms the

3343:

Alright, enough of this bull. I feel like it's just racists changing this page saying everyone they don't like is brown. It's time for a real brown man to straighten some things out for you all. The brown race has always been considered South Asian and Southeast Asian. The fact that Southeast Asia

2800:

It would be helpful for you to state which "old comments" you are referring to. The (racist) Stoddard map clearly includes all of Europe in "white", not "brown". Coon himself is quoted as saying "the so-called Brown Race ... was for the most part an extension of the same Mediterranean family into

2759:

I read here some old comments among Spaniards, Mediterraneans, etc, lumping together Southern Europeans with other Mediterraneans, etc. It is all the same kind of stereotypes based on the deep ignorance of many people, if not wishful thinking by some who seem to find some kind of strange solace in

1642:

This is the biggest problem that I have come across in race related articles. You can have a look at the White people article itself. Right now it is not perfect but some time ago it looked like a Nazi manifesto. What I have found surprising is that most of these people come from the United States

1148:

SqueakBox, Uncle G is one of the most respected contributors on Knowledge. You appear to be allowing your personal views about this terminology to override normal standards of civility, and I am not at all convinced that you have properly read the rewritten article, which is carefully neutral and

3396:

This issue is very frustrating because it shows how Americans look down at us and still dictate the idea of 'race' and who's brown while the actual brown people have no say. How would you like it if Indonesians declared Kazakhs to be white and changed the 'white race' page on Knowledge to include

2424:

this is pointless. I often refer to my Grandparents as brown people, but only jokingly. My grandfather is of a lot of Spanish heritage, and my grandmother is of primarily American Indian descent. I may refer to them as "Brown" people, but I still admit that my grandfather is White, as are many

1590:

I insist. I do not agree with the article, but if we are to analyse the concept, white people, who like to invent all these terms to refer to other people, ignore the fact that they are also some shade of brown and that they are certainly not "white". So if the article stays, the statement should

1463:

The article is a mess and I cant figure out how to clean it up. The Mexican section appears after the references but in the text this isnt so, and being after the refs it converts the refs code inot unreadable text. can someone please fix it, this article is a disgrace to wikipedia in its current

2593:

I removed the section about Middle Easterners, as it didn't discuss Middle Easterners as "brown people", but whether they are "white" or not, which is irrelevant to this article. Furthermore, none of the sources seemd to refer to them as such, and Middle Easterners are hardly ever referred to by

2528:

User:Goldenhawk 0 please note that there is a section for historical definitions of brown people which already includes Giuseppi Sergi's (1938) Mediterranean race. You, User:Goldenhawk 0, have added Sergi to the present day definitions which has made it redundant in the article. If you wish to

2409:

I think the problem is that black and white people are mainstream concepts and brown people is at best an obscure anthropoloigical concept but by having a wikipedia article here it appears to give the concept simil;ar weight in the world to that of black and white people. Personally I would feel

3461:, who wrote the wall of text above. I think they are fundamentally missing the point that the article is about (rightly outdated) 19th-century (and early 20th) concepts of race based on skin colour; the modern world's got little do with it. (Hence the diversion about Brazilians is a bit odd...) 3392:

If you don't want to call them white, that's your prerogative (you can just refer to them as Latino, not brown), but if they have a significant amount of European ancestry and share similar culture, they have every right to self identify as white. I would never tell someone with 50% or even 25%

750:

If 'Blackies' aren't Brown, then I must be colourblind. My eyesight is perfect. I'm, supposed to be 'White', but I'm anything but. I agree entirely with Squeakbox. You'll be saying ginger haired people aren't ginger haired next, because it's 'politically incorrect'. White, Black, Brown, Yellow,

3416:

This diatribe makes no sense. The sentence you keep mangling is about 19th-century ideas. How we see matters today has nothing to do with it. Additionally, your insertion about "the official "brown race"" is uncited and nonsensical; there is obviously no such thing as an "official" brown race.

1284:

According to your logic one cant criticise articles. Absurd! Just because you wont acknowledge what you and Uncle G are up to (using academic references to pursue OR) doesnt mean others cant tell the truth. i would remind you to stop reminding me in a petty, unintelligent way as if you are the

2565:

It measures the skin pigmentation of different populations in areas of the body not exposed to the sun. Spaniards, who are Southern Europeans, in case somebody ignores it,(samples from two regions in Spain), in spite of living in a Mediterranean area, where a darker skin pigmentation is to be

2610:

Middles Eastern Arabs are definitely "brown people", even if they are Semitic or Caucasian by bone structure. They have brown skin and will tan to very dark brown or black in the sun. Besides, a gigantic portion of peninsular Arabs are of mixed race heritage since ancient or even prehistoric

2041:

You have yet, in either the AFD discussion or on this talk page, to give a coherent explanation of any problem with the subject matter that relates to our content policies, in particular the one that the tag links to. Please explicitly state which part of that policy you think applies.

1167:

I agree with Guy. I also am concerned that SqueakBox may have violated 3RR in the process. Since myself and another editor have now characterized this article as neutral, I would like to remove the NPOV tag. Can anyone give a specific and valid reason for leaving it on the article?

3574:

Sicilians experience is much closer to that of "Brown America" than "White America" this is clear because of how Sicilians were viewed in a legal sense in Brown vs. Board of Education. The other citation is there to show how people around the world more broadly consider Sicilians as

822:

Thanks for clearing that up! Well, the author of your source hardly speaks Afrikaans fluently, whereas I do. I suppose it reflects the document when such spelling is used, but if you wish to refer to the way it's spoken lately, you need to use the spelling in the article about

2106:, and this is not my IMO but the reality of the world in which we live, where the very concept of brown people is marginal. This is a sensitive subject and it is too obscure to be here. IMO the next afd is just a matter of when not if as I am clearly not alone in this thought, 733:

Squeakbox, your suggestion that song lyrics are good source for this is pretty unreasonable. You obviously have strong feelings on this subject, but you have to understand that our individual opinions on the subject matter mean very little- we use proper sources instead.

1964:

says, this is clearly an encyclopaedia article not a dictionary article. It's also relatively clear that the historical concept is strongly related to the modern concept still in use by the IBGE and others, belying your argument that these are entirely separate things.

1699:

Yes, it is widely written about. And one of the people who has written about this particular aspect of it (note the chapter title) at length is Forbes. He has a lot to say — several pages in fact — on the subject of "everyday observation", quoting people such as

1474:

Fixed. Another editor removed a significant portion of a reference (including the end tag) in the process of blanking a significant portion of the text without discussion here first. I also disagree with your blanking of parts of the lead section. Please remain

309: 288: 3050:

Compared to the 'White people' and 'Black people' articles the notions 'white race' and 'black race' are never used in the lead. Racial categorization is controversial and outdated. If nobody is against it I will remove the term 'brown race' from the lead.

1843:

There's no central underlying concept here that has an encyclopedic meaning. As the article now says, "Historically, the appellation "brown people" has been applied by various people to a wide range of disparate, and disconnected, groups of people." As per

1345:"U.S. is definitely Judeo-Saxon in every sense: culturally, socially, and morally. The old-money W.A.S.P.s and Ashkenazi Jews are also increasingly intermarrying one another, so within a few generations, distinctions may be further blurred than at present. 3344:

wasn't even included on this page before I arrived but Latin America was reaffirms my suspicions that it's probably some racists in America who are more concerned with putting people they don't like in this box, instead of the ACTUAL PEOPLE who are brown.

2080:

IMO Google results for brown people come up with a bunch of articles which appear to insult allegedly brown people, and while this article doesnt do that in its content I fear that in its concept it feeds into a basically negative concept of human beings,

3379:

Also, whites and mestizos (mixed white and indigenous people) make up the vast majority of Latin America, meaning that the average Latin American has at least 50% or more European DNA. In some areas more, in some less, but this is the overall average.

1200:(4) Try telling South African Nationals that they are just white or just black or just brown. It's just not accurate enough. Why must this article imply that this is the case for Mexicans and Hispanics? Obviously someone is not doing his/her research. 2555:

One interesting issue is skin pigmatation in Southern Europeans and people here (from the discussion and some cherry picked authors in the body of the article) seem keen to ignore all scientific evidence and continue with their stereotypes. See here:

1704:

on the subject of colour perception. Three particular sentences are apposite here. The first, from page 96, is is: "Anyone who takes the time to carefully look at another human being or at one's own body will immediately be struck by the fact that

3219:

If you wish to engage in constructive behavior (e.g. questioning the validity of sources), a good place to start would be on the talk pages of the respective articles. Resorting to random drive-by reverts is generally considered unhelpful. Thanks.

3319:

2 makes little more sense, particularly with the "so-called" bit, given that no-one is referred to as a "middle eastern" in English. It is hard to even tell who you are referring to, although obviously plenty of people in the Middle East are not

2550:

Here you have a recent and scientific study of skin pigmentation in diffenrent popualtions. It could be very interesting in the article. Facts versus perceptions. 21st scientific information versus 18and 19th century Nordicist propaganda, etc.

2807:(the US term for Latin Americans) with "Spaniards"? The fact of the matter is that scientific racism used "brown" for populations that blended from "black" to "white" and were difficult to classify otherwise. This included the populations of 688:

an academic subject, as clearly evidenced by the several sources cited that treat it as such. Problems with such articles only arise when editors decide to write articles on such subjects based upon song lyrics rather than upon good sources.

1089:

We are talking about the people being referred to no those crass enough to do the referring and all Mexicans are not brown ,l that's justrt an ignorant generalisation. Pleasse source your claim that all Mexicans are brown, and take a look at

2769:

But if people are too lazy to read it here is a summary. The link is to a page that is controversial but the summary is good. In fact you can check it in the original paper if you are diligent. I include it here for those too lazy.

930:

mense (Brown people) or Black. There are some 3.6 million South Africans who identify themselves as 'coloured'" - Robins, Steven; Planning Suburban Bliss in Joe Slovo Park, Cape Town. Africa, 2002, vol. 72, issue 4, p 530, ISSN

666:

Song lyrics are fine, we are not talking about an academic subject but about yoyur absurd claim that no people are brown. If you keep deleting anything that contradicts your own beliefs we end up with a really useless article,

3726:

I reverted your page move because the usage of "brown" is totally different from that of "Black / White people". The latter terms are in common use in modern English, but it is very uncommon to call anybody "brown". See also

1149:

very well-referenced. Knowledge is an encyclopaedia, a tertiary source, we report what the secondary sources say. That is precisely what we are doing here. Please calm down and stop attacking Uncle G, it is not helping.

2701:

Yeah, sorry I cannot view the source of this map, but its part of wikimedia commons. A number of others wikipedia articles link to it.Its a good example how "brown people" where defined during the british colonial period.

2737:

Disagreed! Why is "brown people" a racist tag? The worlds largest democracy (India) self indentify as a nation of brown people. The Arab Middle east inluding Egypt does so, too.There is nothing wrong with being brown!!!

3244:

The same highly controversial paragraph has been spammed into 16 different articles. I don't consider the encyclopedia.com source reliable, the article dabs are very poor and the whole paragraph bordering on racist. ♫

3022:

Clearly nobody believes in the out-dated and poorly structured racial concept of "black", "brown", "white", "yellow", and "red". I believe this article represents the old racial structure prior to modern anthropology.

1653:

The historical usage of "Brown people" in physical anthropology is not a "minority racist concept". Your refusal to recognize this makes it impossible to discuss the article's worth. You are beginning to edit out of

775:

This article does nothing of the sort. You don't have to be "racially obsessed" to study the history of physical anthropology. Nor does this article impose American "racial theories" on the world. In fact, it was a

1785:

Well it clearly cant be perma protected as that isnt how wikipedia works (especially with such a new and controversial article) and needs to be unprotected shortly. If this doesnt happen a request needs to be made at

2347:

However such a disambiguation page would go on and on and then you have to present sources and explain which definition is recongnized where and then you'd make a whole article again. Your suggestion is impractical.

1558:) and is not just some "igorance of being brown". The source of calling white people "white" is also much better addressed in that other article and is simply not applicable in discussing the term "Brown people". 3602:

We can also see many historical examples of Sicilians facing job discrimination because of the tone of their skin. Sicilians because of this have often been labeled or self identify themselves as brown. <ref:

2069:, is not notable enough to justify an article. The way the article is written doesnt contradicty our policies but an article can be well written and fail the notability test, and I believe that is the case here, 164: 852:

Ouch. Now I don't speak Afrikaans, but being German can read it, and tend to believe someone who speaks it. Here are some results of a quick search: Google for South African pages containing "bruin" or "bryn":

946:

and then mentions that "members of this community have tended throughout the period of research to identify themselves informally as bryn". This is not to say, then, that he encountered this spelling in 2002.

1580:

You are refusing to read the article's content nor the references and until you do, you will continue to argue around the actual issue. Do you not agree that the term was used by physical anthropologists?

1329:

I agree with with deleting it. It just represents the twisted, strange and deeply racist view of "some" Americans when they deal with race, etc. It is as if I used these radical views to speak of Americans:

1612:

Point of view?. My God! Do you mean that "white" people are literally "white". Do you doubt that they are some shade of brown themselves or may look other colors but certainly not white? What do you mean?.

3700:

nations, primarily founded as anglo-saxon colonies. It is all pretty bogus, a legacy, not a definition; the assemblage from other articles and primary sources does not constitute an identifiable "race". ~

3388:

Also, due to European colonization, there is significant European influence and ancestry in Latin America; hence, you can refer to Latin America as white, just like you have done with Canada and the U.S.

2962:

Stop it with the black, white, and now brown and yellow people here. Rarely is this classifictaion used in this article, but correct terms used in the US are not part of the worldwide name classification

2101:

For instance if you compare the editing traffic at black and white people with those here (the only other skin-colour based people article we have) there is much higher traffic, thus it fails "attracting

1497:

In fact white people are not literally "white". Most of them are some shade of brown, some may even look pinkish or reddish, but none of them white. These concepts derive from a eurocentric view of race.

3441:

No matter how angry they get, racist whites do not dictate, and will never dictate who is actually brown. It is the actual brown race (e.g Indonesians, Indians, etc.) gets to have the say in the matter.

1951:

correctly. Read the table to see how this article is more like the description of an octopus than the parts of speech and etymology of the word octopus. I completely disagree with your assessment.

2235:

The perception of who is brown, who is white, who is black, etc...changes depending on your location. You cant make a disambigaution page when the term needs to be explained depending on the region.

2031:

I agree fully with the tag and while I recognise that the afd failed I think the tag hits it on the head by saying it is the subject matter itself that is the problem not the quality of the article,

360: 239: 1623:

No, PoV is : "...white people, who like to invent all these terms to refer to other people..." and "...(white people) ignore the fact that they are also some shade of brown...". That is PoV.

2389:). Nor do they really refer to "brown people" as a conceptual term, but to people considered by some to be brown. The latter simply isn't encyclopedic. If it were, then we would have to have a 3483: 1804:

I have closed the recent AfD for this article, but due to me not being an administrator I cannot remove the notice from the top of the article since it is protected. I will make a request.

1135:. The article has made no such claim. I have made no such claim. Inventing a claim and attributing it to other people, and then requesting that they defend it, is a straw man argument. 1256:

Indeed, sourcing is no substitute for decent encyclopedia writing. Following the letter and absolutely not the spirit of wikipedia policies can produce a contrived OR piece like this,

2357:

I dont agree it would be impractical. I dont believe there are that many people who we can source identify themselves as brown, and what it would be is better than the page we have,

916:" ("my colour is betweek dark and light brown") - Posel, Deborah. 2001. “What’s In a Name? Racial Categorisations Under Apartheid and Their Afterlife.” Transformation 47 (2001): 69. 1992:, then I think we would have a case to disambiguate it. As it stands right now, just the first definition is in the article, which is a coherent concept, though I might well prefer 934:

Kriel (2002) refers to an interview with Theuns Eloff, principal of the Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, where he states that: "Daar is verder 2,9 miljoen

55: 3597:

Another example is when Sicilians were disembarking at Ellis Island and New Orleans by the millions, they were required to check off "Sicilian" rather than “White." <ref: -->

3517: 552: 525: 515: 1299:

Economist Robert Ferguson was interviewed in 2004 by Black Issues in Higher Education and used the term "Brown people" when discussing the need for better minority education

1043:- the official Afrikaans spelling rules and word list which will clearly show "bruin" used in several examples and absolutely none using bryn. --08:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 500: 1659:

content of the actual article and discuss the article meaningfully rather than from the point of straw men and out of your own concept of what the article's title "means".

2502:

This article is just a way for American mongrels (all are mongrels but some think that they are white) to vent their frustration. The entire world is laughing at them---

596:

to see the difference between the alleged black person and the black dog, to claim that people arent brown is likle claiming the sky isnt up, it is a defiance of reality,

1076:

The article did not say that. It quite clearly said that some people refer to Mexican Americans as brown people. That is what the source says, too. Please consult our

530: 520: 158: 3552:

The Brown vs. Board of Education article doesn't seem to be relevant, and the Cole book is not about America. Could you please provide a page number and a quote ? --

2876: 843:) talks about "Bruinmense" on page 140. But that book was written in 1953. In contrast, Stone, who discusses "brynmense" and related words, was writing in 2002. 3769: 449: 439: 3759: 565: 350: 211: 2367:

It's not always what someone identifies themselves as. It is sometimes what others identify you as. Thus getting back to Lukas19's point of "X people are

657:

On the contrary: This is meant to be an accurate and reliable encyclopaedia. Basing articles upon song lyrics, as you are doing, does not lead to either.

3774: 3764: 3274:

2) The so-called "middle easterns" have always been classified as whites / caucasoids, this attempt at separation is part of the modern alt-right agenda.

3754: 3361:

If White = Europe, and Black = Sub-Sahara Africa, Brown = ?...anyone with brown skin? Wrong. It is the MESA Region (MESA = Middle East & South Asia)

510: 90: 1178:

I agree with SqueakBox. Neither Mexicans nor Hispanics are brown people, either in shade of color or in ancestry. The article does not make this claim,

926:

Robins (2002) writes: "The term 'coloured' (kleurling) is highly contested and unstable. Other terns used to describe people of mixed ancestry include

780:

who first characterized five races that included SE Asia as "brown people". Please edit and discuss this article from a more neutral PoV. Thanks.

2210:

use "brown people" as a "different word for the same thing" and should be merged. Since there are multiple meanings, the policy is to disambiguate.

2148:

is about the word "octopus": its part of speech, its pluralizations, its usage, its etymology, its translations into other languages, and so forth.

912:

Posel (2001) refers to an appellant at the Cape Town Race Classification Appeal Board, where the appellant states "my kleur is tussen donker en lig-

712:, if it can be sourced that many black people think they are brown none of them need to be academics to make this true, as I am sure you well know, 561: 415: 2386: 2116: 326: 1776:

Soooo, are we going to have some discussion on this, or is the article going to be perma-protected? (Nothing doing for a fortnight, it seems.)

414:, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 2898:

A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (

1312: 3598: 1787: 3355:

It says on this page brown is a racial classification, yet you are butchering our race by making a mockery of it and calling everyone brown.

96: 3077: 2978: 2964: 2739: 2612: 2509: 1191:). (3) Some editors, including SqueakBox and myself have tried to rectify the matter, and are reverted with no legitimate justification. 919:

Wardrop (2002) writes: "In South African colloquial speech, members of the so-called 'Coloured' population, are often referred to as the

3634:

Oliver Brown), nor does the NYT article. To assume that Sicilians were called "brown" because they were discriminated against, would be

2703: 2631: 2573: 473: 406: 383: 3476:

WHO TOOK MIDDLE EASTERN AND NORTH AFRICAN OUT OF THE OFFICIAL DEFINITION OF BROWN PEOPLE PLEASE ADD IT BACK ASAP FOR OBVIOUS REASONS

2764: 2560: 3499: 3252: 3229: 2943: 2846: 2786: 2719: 317: 294: 3487: 1439:. Specific discussion of how the term "brown people" are used in classification schemes comes within the main body of the article. 2839:

18/19early 20th century Nordicist propaganda and keep on ignoring modern science, in this case measuring skin pigmentation. Nudge.

2594:

colour by others, but by ethnicity (Arab, Turk, Jew) and they don't define themselves according to Western colour standards anyway.

3604: 684:. And as I said above, my beliefs, which you have no way of knowing, are irrelevant. This is an article based upon sources, and 3458: 3362: 2912: 2491: 2441: 1554:

That is simply not true. The term "white" can be sourced from Latin/Greek comparisons to other people in the Mediterranean (see

1544:

Do not agree. those terms are made up by white people to refer to other people ignoring the basic fact that they are also brown.

923:

Afrikaners (brown Afrikaners)" - Wardrop, Joan; Australian Journal of Anthropology, 2002, vol. 13, issue 3, p 384, ISSN 10358811.

1183:

we are to consider "brown-looking" Hispanics or "brown-looking" Mexicans, you'll find that this is a subset of both groups (see

1040: 836:

Your spelling might simply be outdated. Adhikari talks about an article "Ons Bruinmense" that was written in 1962. Patterson (

3305: 827:

in South Africa, where "ui" is used instead of "y". Hopefully I can get hold of the source and read it properly over the week.

110: 41: 2535: 1077: 840: 608: 115: 31: 3613:

Hope you have a great day and all is well, and I hope this helps and I look forward to working with you! Thank you so much!

1266:

I'll remind you again, SqueakBox to refrain from characterizing the article in a defamatory way. To do so is to break the

886:

agree that this somehow invalidates any other contributions by Uncle G. That would violate the assumption of good faith.

179: 3383: 2263: 2001: 1867: 813:

discussion of the "stigma of illegitimacy" and an "enduring myth" in popular thinking. Please read what the source says.

85: 35: 1997: 146: 3662:

Could we specifcy somewhere that people don't have these colors, and they have skin tones and that the term is erronous

2154: 895: 269: 3070:

She is light skinned, She only can be brown for the narrow mind of americans that think that latinos can't be white.

2908: 2529:

dispute the current historical versus present day layout of the article, then please discuss it on this talk page.----

777: 76: 2779:

North Africa is very close to the one found in Europe, althoug Europe, Spain included, present the lightest. Nudge.

2773: 1829:

Should be unprotected as nobody has had a chance to edit this since it passed its afd and its been 10 days or more,

723:

no sources that discuss that at all. I strongly suggest that you read the cited books and journal articles first.

2718:

This tag seems a bit racist don't you think? Useless article, and it seems quite prejiduced. Request for deletion.

1302:. His use is combination with Black people and White people as descriptors for general culture groups in America. 681: 625:

So one poor reference makes for a truth, eh? I have now referenced that some people do think skin colour is brown,

3701: 235: 207: 882:

article. I'd agree that bruin- not bryn- is more appropriate given everything I've found online. However, I do

2968: 2743: 2616: 2513: 2267: 1871: 1528: 865:. I thus have serious doubts about the existence and reliablity of Uncle G's sources mentioned in this page. -- 3081: 2214:

Second, one refers to Asian/Oceanian descent, while in practice the Brazilian one is due to African descent.--

2141:

is about the species of animal: its physiology, its use as food, its scientific classification, and so forth.

1435:. It is not research. It's the same has having a line at the beginning of an article about apples that says 863: 257: 140: 2707: 2635: 860: 648:

Please dont delete references, it amy not be ana academic ref but this isnt an academic encyclopedia either,

3599:

https://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2018/12/06/frank-capra-oversimplified-italian-american-story/ideas/essay/

3426: 3406: 3233: 3056: 2986: 2947: 2577: 2425:

Hispanics in the United States. Everyone is actually a shade of Brown. I call for deletion. Anyone else?

1602:"Brown people". That is not neutral. You need to stop adding your point of view to this article, please. 1348:

As the great German intellectual Werner Sombart said: “Americanism is to a great extent distilled Judaism.”

612: 120: 1993: 3690: 3249: 2850: 2790: 2723: 2599: 2487: 2017:

and the parts are different, we have a dictionary definition. If on the other hand, if the octopus is the

1184: 1091: 487: 2053:

The problem is that the concept of brown people fails the notability test that we apply to all articles.

752: 136: 1745: 866: 751:

whatever, so what? It doesn't need an 'issue' making of it. Wipe the article, it's not worth the space.

275: 3665:

On the black people page it is specfificed that the term si derogatory, oudated and reductive as well.

2936:

Should the article be re-written by someone who has a stronger command of English? My vote is "yes".

3670: 3479: 3374: 3293: 3225: 3073: 3032: 3009: 2939: 2842: 2782: 2569: 2505: 2483: 2479: 2437: 2429: 2103: 3297: 2765:

http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/chem/faculty/leontis/chem447/PDF_files/Jablonski_skin_color_2000.pdf

2561:

http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/chem/faculty/leontis/chem447/PDF_files/Jablonski_skin_color_2000.pdf

2338:

according to some definitions while some may consider them white while some may consider them black.

2332:

according to some definitions while some may consider them white while some may consider them black.

2326:

according to some definitions while some may consider them white while some may consider them black.

1727: 1449:

Except that it is OR, NPOV and not true so it needs sourcing or we need an opening we can agree on,

1300: 228: 200: 186: 3623: 3531: 3466: 3444: 3422: 3328: 3301: 2828: 2393:(per the Biko discussion on this page) that either defined a range of meanings or disambiguated to 2093: 1701: 172: 66: 1984:

were used to describe not just racially privileged members of the European diaspora, but also the

325:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3682: 3448: 3052: 2982: 2902:

has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

2691: 2530: 2390: 2170: 1976:

My actions on other pages are immaterial to the discussion and I haven't substantively looked at

1245: 1201: 1192: 81: 3605:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/12/opinion/columbus-day-italian-american-racism.html

3658:"black", "red", "brown", "yellow", and other "colored" people or "persons of color" DON'T EXIST 3403: 3316:

Your point 1 is ridiculous. Blumenbach is not the only person to attempt such a classification.

3736: 3686: 3647: 3557: 3363:

https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2016/07/about-the-middle-east-and-south-asia-region.html

3246: 3097: 2880: 2595: 2286: 1989: 1890: 1685: 948: 837: 828: 803: 62: 3721: 3287:

3) No, Pardos are not and have never been referred to as "brown" in Brazil / Latin America.

1948: 1815:

Well please undo your closure or get the article unprotected or I will revert your closure,

1535: 1353: 1103:

For the third time: The article did not say that. And nowhere have I made any such claim.

738: 3740: 3704: 3694: 3674: 3651: 3627: 3561: 3535: 3491: 3470: 3452: 3332: 3309: 3277: 3255: 3237: 3085: 3060: 3037: 3013: 2990: 2972: 2951: 2916: 2854: 2832: 2794: 2747: 2727: 2711: 2695: 2639: 2620: 2603: 2581: 2540: 2517: 2466: 2454: 2414: 2401: 2376: 2361: 2352: 2239: 2227: 2218: 2110: 2096: 2085: 2073: 2046: 2035: 2025: 2008: 1969: 1955: 1933: 1833: 1819: 1810: 1794: 1780: 1771: 1761: 1748: 1721: 1693: 1674: 1663: 1647: 1637: 1627: 1617: 1606: 1595: 1584: 1573: 1562: 1548: 1538: 1516: 1505: 1483: 1468: 1453: 1443: 1425: 1375: 1319: 1306: 1289: 1278: 1260: 1248: 1235: 1204: 1195: 1172: 1162: 1139: 1122: 1111: 1098: 1084: 1070: 1011: 951: 902: 890: 869: 847: 831: 817: 806: 784: 766: 755: 741: 727: 716: 693: 671: 661: 652: 643: 629: 619: 600: 3666: 3635: 3513: 3024: 3005: 2433: 1806: 1655: 1271: 874: 541: 152: 2930:

Consider the following sentence from this article, which has numerous grammatical flaws:

1371:"some" of whom seem to view Americans as suspicious "whites" who are really not "white"? 2869: 3619: 3547: 3521: 3462: 3418: 3384:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2009/12/how-argentina-became-white/#.XTpQxehKjIU

3324: 3001: 2899: 2824: 2678: 2645: 2451: 2411: 2358: 2224: 2166: 2107: 2082: 2070: 2032: 1830: 1816: 1791: 1671: 1634: 1570: 1476: 1465: 1450: 1432: 1422: 1286: 1257: 1119: 1095: 1067: 763: 713: 668: 649: 626: 597: 593: 2133:

Articles are about the people, concepts, places, events, and things that their titles

1929:

Note again, that none of these concepts are referred to primarily as "brown people."--

1643:

and want to impose on the rest of the world their twisted and strange ideas on race.

3748: 2997: 2687: 2323: 2066: 1845: 1267: 1230: 1224: 1157: 1151: 3732: 3728: 3643: 3639: 3568: 3553: 3212: 3204: 2654: 2463: 2394: 2373: 2349: 2335: 2299: 2296: 2282: 2236: 2191: 2058: 2054: 2043: 1981: 1977: 1966: 1961: 1952: 1944: 1940: 1903: 1900: 1886: 1718: 1660: 1624: 1603: 1581: 1559: 1555: 1513: 1480: 1440: 1409: 1393: 1389: 1316: 1303: 1275: 1169: 1136: 1108: 1081: 1063: 899: 887: 844: 814: 781: 724: 709: 690: 658: 640: 616: 411: 398: 377: 322: 3393:

Southeast Asian DNA that's part of the culture that they're not a brown brother.

3269: 1421:

ie a source that brown people are ethnic, cultural and societal classifications,

857: 2774:

http://racialreality.blogspot.com/2006/01/skin-reflectance-of-selected-world.html

1512:

derivation (which is covered later in the article when discussing anthropology.

854: 17: 2812: 2398: 2329: 2215: 2022: 2005: 1930: 1757:

here who like to classify people in colors just try and ignore that basic fact.

1690: 1532: 907:

Just to clarify: this is only about how one spells the Afrikaans word for brown.

735: 680:

fine as a basis for an encyclopaedia article. I strongly suggest that you read

2385:

Lukas' additions aren't encyclopedic, however ("nor is it a usage guide", says

2190:

This article is a meaning and usage history of "brown people." The sections on

1523:

We should focus less on whether such labels are literally correct, and more on

1270:

that the editors who wrote the article extend to you and does not maintain the

2808: 2292: 2195: 2062: 1896: 2686:

In any case, we'd need sources to include anything like that in the article.

2803: 1777: 1768: 1758: 1644: 1614: 1592: 1545: 1502: 1401: 1372: 1244:

If your secondary sources contradict reason, they are not exactly reliable.

1188: 1128: 1080:

policy again. You are not working from sources. Please work from sources.

507:

Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:

3400:

Here's some more citations I'd like to include that back up my claim here:

2144:

Articles are about the actual words or idioms in their title. The article

1336: 878:

The term is also given as "bruin" elsewhere on Knowledge, particularly the

3266:

1) The term "brown race" refers only to Malay race (or Australian race).

2145: 1717:. What is a single sentence in the article is a lot more in the sources. 1527:. "White people aren't white" is a bit of a strawman in this regard. See 1062:

To claim or imply that all Mexicans are brown is rascist claptrap, eg see

501:

Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups

3407:

https://www2.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/documents/A374-DontBrowntheLatinos.pdf

2820: 2811:(which range from very light in the north to very dark in the south) and 2304: 2199: 1908: 879: 824: 798: 410:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to 3505: 3270:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Johann_Friedrich_Blumenbach#Racial_anthropology

2861:

File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.svg Nominated for Deletion

2177: 1315:

that may elicit even more useful references for the usage of the term.

2816: 2259: 2138: 1863: 1417: 1413: 3282: 2181: 468: 2666: 2316: 2310: 2207: 2203: 2158: 1920: 1914: 2021:, then we aren't describing different parts, but different wholes.-- 1118:

That's your opinion, and as an argument it doesnt holod much water,

990:

Van 'n kleur wat bestaan uit 'n vermenging van rooi, swart en geel:

1131:. The only person who has stated that "all Mexicans are brown" is 635:

I've removed the content. You appear to be basing your content on

3375:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-is-a-white-hispanic_b_14086306

2670: 2658: 2650: 2644: 2162: 1741: 1437:

Apples are fruits and fruits are a part of different food pyramids

1352:

You can also check what "some" Europeans think about Americans in

1007: 2184:" have very different etymologies, and are two individual words. 2153:

Articles whose titles are different words for the same thing are

1359:

If you are too lazy to read I will help you cutting and pasting:

1039:

Furthermore you can refer to page 239 of the 2002 edition of the

2662: 2255: 2121: 1859: 1405: 535: 979: 2674: 2649:

A colonial era map shows the races of the world classified by

1988:, non-Caucasian Russians, and anti-Communist partisans in the 1985: 1960:

The sources say that there was and is such a concept, and, as

1684:

What is this line supposed to mean exactly? (No, the wikilink

251: 223: 195: 26: 3512:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

1740:

Look at that picture and tell me that that is not the colour

1464:

state and we cant blame it on newbies. Some bug I cant find,

3504: 3404:

https://niemanreports.org/articles/dont-brown-the-hispanics/

2176:

Different words warrant different articles. For example: "

3000:

but you would have to show it is not a notable topic, see

2475:

HEY PUT MY ARTICLE THE WAY IT WAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1431:

This is good summary of what to expect in the article per

2223:

I strongly support disambigaution of this articler page,

3373:

of Hispanics living in the U.S self-identify as white.

3278:

https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html

1939:

That's odd, you don't seem to be adding the same tag to

1501:

One user insists on deleting it. What is wrong with it?

1341:

If you cannot open it, I have cut and posted this part:

944:

Stone refers to research conducted between 1963 and 1991

3192: 3186: 3180: 3174: 3168: 3162: 3156: 3150: 3144: 3138: 3132: 3126: 3120: 3114: 3108: 3102: 1210:

You seem to be misisng the point. It's not about what

1002:

for coloured people. There is no bryn. There is a word

2823:" born of miscegenation of black and white parents. -- 171: 3365:

Note: Southeast Asia is included in South Asia here.

1333:

Here you have what "some" people think of Americans:

1107:

You are not reading what the article actually says.

592:

Have you looked at a few people recently? Look at my

553:

Knowledge:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

526:

Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment

516:

Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action

321:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2372:cultural uses among some populations still today. 2262:. For more on such systems of classifications, see 2013:On the octopus analogy: if the octopus is the term 1866:. For more on such systems of classifications, see 2546:Skin pigmantation in a 21 century scientific study 2258:, as a classification, a term of identity, and an 1862:, as a classification, a term of identity, and an 2877:File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.svg 1726: 531:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention 521:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes 1848:, it should be made into a disambiguation page. 1127:Talking of arguments: Please stop constructing 44:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3323:3 needs a cite, not your personal experience. 992:Bruin hare, oë. Bruin gebrand deur die son... 497:of articles within the scope of this project. 185: 8: 3262:This article is biased and completely wrong. 3715:"Brown" is different from "Black" / "White" 3433:Who is responsible for this editorializing? 3283:https://en.wikipedia.org/Mediterranean_race 255: 3638:. The other two articles don't qualify as 3477: 3291: 3290:Source: I am Brazilian / Latin American. 3223: 3071: 1311:Also found a decent Google Scholar search 708:with as you. nothing about song lyrics in 511:Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles 457: 372: 283: 2061:are notable concepts. Brown people, like 1851:The page would look something like this: 3339:Having brown skin doesn't make you brown 1337:http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2007/01/ 1105:Please read what the text actually says. 607:what the article says. Please read our 2387:Knowledge:Knowledge is not a dictionary 2117:Knowledge:Knowledge is not a dictionary 1680:"No people are really brown in colour." 374: 285: 3092:Unexplained removal of sourced content 2905:This notification is provided by a Bot 2885:Deletion requests - No timestamp given 2157:that should be merged. For examples: 1788:Knowledge:Requests_for_page_protection 797:Take into account that I speak of the 3770:Low-importance Ethnic groups articles 3484:2603:9000:7806:F3E0:D0:3118:6993:8AFD 3096:There has been spate of rollbacks by 2879:, has been nominated for deletion at 461:WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: 7: 3760:Low-importance Anthropology articles 2002:Whiteness (racialized social status) 1041:af:Afrikaanse woordelys en spelreëls 404:This article is within the scope of 315:This article is within the scope of 3145:White Hispanic and Latino Americans 1998:White (Eurocentric racial category) 424:Knowledge:WikiProject Ethnic groups 274:It is of interest to the following 34:for discussing improvements to the 3775:WikiProject Ethnic groups articles 3765:Start-Class Ethnic groups articles 3163:Discrimination based on skin color 3115:Puerto Ricans in the United States 2996:We have a process for deletion at 942:Finally, on page 381 of Adhikari, 427:Template:WikiProject Ethnic groups 335:Knowledge:WikiProject Anthropology 210:on 17 January 2007. The result of 25: 3755:Start-Class Anthropology articles 338:Template:WikiProject Anthropology 3459:Special:Contributions/BrownSkin5 3397:Kazakhs? Not so nice now is it? 2868: 2755:Spaniards and Southern Europeans 467: 397: 376: 308: 287: 256: 227: 199: 56:Click here to start a new topic. 3198:These have been undone, since: 2875:An image used in this article, 1707:there is no single color at all 1214:tell them, it's about what the 444:This article has been rated as 355:This article has been rated as 238:on 23 July 2012. The result of 234:This article was nominated for 206:This article was nominated for 3358:Here's a logic game for you: 3338: 3157:Race and ethnicity in Colombia 2092:This article should be deleted 1494:I have made tis contribution: 1078:Knowledge:No original research 982:entry should be enlightening " 609:Knowledge:No original research 1: 3705:09:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC) 3333:06:43, 29 November 2018 (UTC) 3310:01:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC) 3193:Hispanic and Latino Americans 3151:Brown (racial classification) 2712:03:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 2696:19:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 2640:03:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 2582:20:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 2415:17:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2402:18:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2377:17:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2362:01:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2353:00:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2264:Race (historical definitions) 2240:00:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2228:15:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 2219:15:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 2111:04:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 2097:03:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 2086:17:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 2074:17:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 2047:23:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 2036:22:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 2026:23:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 2009:23:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 1970:23:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 1956:22:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 1934:16:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 1868:Race (historical definitions) 1274:of the discussion. Thanks. 1014:14:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 952:00:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 903:23:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 639:. Please use good sources. 418:and see a list of open tasks. 329:and see a list of open tasks. 53:Put new text under old text. 36:Brown (racial classification) 3695:14:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC) 3675:14:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) 3498:"Brown Americans" listed at 2541:06:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1834:17:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 1820:20:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1811:20:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1795:16:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1781:10:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1772:05:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 1762:22:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1749:17:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 1722:00:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1694:21:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1675:22:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1664:20:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1648:20:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1638:20:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1628:20:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1618:20:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1607:20:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1596:20:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1585:19:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1574:19:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1563:19:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1549:19:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1539:19:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1517:19:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1506:19:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1484:18:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1479:and constructive. Thanks. 1469:17:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1454:19:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1444:18:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1426:17:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1376:03:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1320:00:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1307:21:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1290:19:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1279:19:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1261:16:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1249:16:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1236:11:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1205:00:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1196:00:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1173:20:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1163:20:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1140:19:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1123:19:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1112:18:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1099:18:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1085:18:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1071:17:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 896:Knowledge:Search engine test 891:20:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 870:17:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 848:11:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 832:09:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 818:02:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 807:22:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 785:18:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 767:17:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 756:21:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 742:19:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 728:19:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 717:19:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 694:18:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 672:18:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 662:18:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 653:17:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 644:17:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 630:17:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 620:01:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 601:01:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 3492:07:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 3256:15:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC) 3238:11:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC) 2883:in the following category: 2518:10:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 2313:people in the United States 2295:race, as described by late 1917:people in the United States 1899:race, as described by late 1729:File:SenatorBarackObama.jpg 61:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3791: 3741:18:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC) 3652:11:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC) 3628:10:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC) 3562:09:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC) 3536:02:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 3471:08:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC) 2604:12:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 2397:/whites in South Africa.-- 1325:This article is incredible 1216:reliable secondary sources 682:Knowledge:Reliable sources 450:project's importance scale 3453:17:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC) 3427:22:33, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 3061:12:12, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 3038:21:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 2973:04:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 2952:21:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 2917:14:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 2855:13:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 2833:12:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 2795:11:21, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 2467:15:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 2455:19:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 2127: 2124: 978:The Afrikaans dictionary 474:WikiProject Ethnic groups 456: 443: 407:WikiProject Ethnic groups 392: 354: 303: 282: 91:Be welcoming to newcomers 3516:. Please participate in 3500:Redirects for discussion 3086:20:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC) 3014:14:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 2991:13:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 2748:08:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 2728:02:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 2621:08:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 2268:Color metaphors for race 1872:Color metaphors for race 1529:color metaphors for race 1525:how these terms are used 1268:assumption of good faith 318:WikiProject Anthropology 3582:that they were seen as 3520:if you wish to do so. 3518:the redirect discussion 3187:Racism in South America 1569:is simply no the case, 613:Knowledge:Verifiability 3509: 2909:CommonsNotificationBot 2682: 2307:people in South Africa 1911:people in South Africa 1734: 1185:Demographics of Mexico 1092:Demographics of Mexico 430:Ethnic groups articles 264:This article is rated 86:avoid personal attacks 3657: 3508: 3205:provide any rationale 3202:the editor failed to 2677:(shown colored light 2657:(shown colored red), 2648: 2254:is a term used as in 2115:Look at the chart on 1994:White (racial status) 1858:is a term used as in 1733:No, not brown at all. 1732: 1713:suggest that editors 998:for coloured man and 341:Anthropology articles 111:Neutral point of view 3169:Coloniality of power 3139:Venezuelan Americans 2104:Knowledge:Notability 1759:Veritas et Severitas 1645:Veritas et Severitas 1615:Veritas et Severitas 1593:Veritas et Severitas 1546:Veritas et Severitas 1503:Veritas et Severitas 1373:Veritas et Severitas 116:No original research 3210:the editor deleted 3133:Colombian Americans 3121:Brazilian Americans 3109:Dominican Americans 2019:set of brown people 1702:Ludwig Wittgenstein 799:South African group 566:discuss these tasks 472:Here are some open 3541:Sicilian Americans 3510: 3175:Colonial mentality 3066:Judith Ortiz Cofer 2900:commons:COM:SPEEDY 2683: 2322:Most residents of 2171:marrow (vegetable) 2155:duplicate articles 1735: 549:Start an article: 270:content assessment 97:dispute resolution 58: 3494: 3482:comment added by 3312: 3296:comment added by 3240: 3228:comment added by 3127:Chilean Americans 3098:User:RichardWeiss 3088: 3076:comment added by 2942:comment added by 2923: 2922: 2889:What should I do? 2881:Wikimedia Commons 2845:comment added by 2831: 2785:comment added by 2588:Middle Easterners 2584: 2572:comment added by 2520: 2508:comment added by 2496: 2482:comment added by 2446: 2432:comment added by 2287:Johann Blumenbach 2188: 2187: 1990:Russian Civil War 1891:Johann Blumenbach 1686:Human skin colour 1396:, the concept of 1384:Opening statement 1234: 1161: 585: 584: 581: 580: 577: 576: 573: 572: 371: 370: 367: 366: 250: 249: 222: 221: 194: 193: 77:Assume good faith 54: 18:Talk:Brown people 16:(Redirected from 3782: 3725: 3640:reliable sources 3572: 3551: 3528: 3195: 3189: 3183: 3181:Racial hierarchy 3177: 3171: 3165: 3159: 3153: 3147: 3141: 3135: 3129: 3123: 3117: 3111: 3105: 3100:to the articles 3035: 3030: 3027: 2954: 2872: 2865: 2864: 2857: 2827: 2797: 2567: 2538: 2533: 2503: 2495: 2476: 2445: 2426: 2285:as described by 2122: 1889:as described by 1730: 1715:read the sources 1490:One contribution 1354:Anti-Americanism 1228: 1155: 994:" It also gives 676:Song lyrics are 495:on the talk page 492: 486: 471: 458: 432: 431: 428: 425: 422: 401: 394: 393: 388: 380: 373: 361:importance scale 343: 342: 339: 336: 333: 312: 305: 304: 299: 291: 284: 267: 261: 260: 252: 231: 224: 203: 196: 190: 189: 175: 106:Article policies 27: 21: 3790: 3789: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3745: 3744: 3719: 3717: 3702:cygnis insignis 3660: 3595: 3566: 3545: 3543: 3522: 3514:Brown Americans 3503: 3435: 3341: 3264: 3213:sourced content 3191: 3185: 3179: 3173: 3167: 3161: 3155: 3149: 3143: 3137: 3131: 3125: 3119: 3113: 3107: 3103:Cuban Americans 3101: 3094: 3068: 3048: 3033: 3028: 3025: 2960: 2937: 2928: 2863: 2840: 2780: 2757: 2661:(shown colored 2590: 2548: 2536: 2531: 2526: 2477: 2427: 2422: 2330:Middle Easterns 2300:anthropologists 2137:. The article 1904:anthropologists 1841: 1827: 1802: 1728: 1682: 1492: 1461: 1386: 1327: 1297: 1060: 1006:but that means 825:coloured people 795: 590: 542:Peruvian people 490: 484: 429: 426: 423: 420: 419: 386: 340: 337: 334: 331: 330: 297: 268:on Knowledge's 265: 132: 127: 126: 125: 102: 72: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3788: 3786: 3778: 3777: 3772: 3767: 3762: 3757: 3747: 3746: 3716: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3659: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3610: 3580: 3542: 3539: 3502: 3496: 3474: 3473: 3434: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3340: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3321: 3317: 3263: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3217: 3216: 3208: 3197: 3093: 3090: 3078:201.252.33.140 3067: 3064: 3047: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3017: 3016: 2979:174.19.131.156 2965:174.19.131.156 2959: 2956: 2927: 2924: 2921: 2920: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2873: 2862: 2859: 2837: 2763: 2756: 2753: 2740:95.223.187.171 2732: 2717: 2699: 2698: 2626: 2613:95.223.187.171 2607: 2606: 2589: 2586: 2554: 2547: 2544: 2525: 2522: 2510:62.175.249.250 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2470: 2469: 2458: 2457: 2421: 2418: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2380: 2379: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2336:North Africans 2333: 2327: 2320: 2314: 2308: 2302: 2289: 2278:may refer to: 2272: 2271: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2186: 2185: 2174: 2167:squash (plant) 2150: 2149: 2142: 2130: 2129: 2126: 2091: 2089: 2088: 2077: 2076: 2050: 2049: 2029: 2028: 2011: 1973: 1972: 1958: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1918: 1912: 1906: 1893: 1882:may refer to: 1876: 1875: 1840: 1839:Unencyclopedic 1837: 1826: 1823: 1801: 1798: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1725: 1724: 1681: 1678: 1667: 1666: 1656:making a point 1631: 1630: 1610: 1609: 1588: 1587: 1566: 1565: 1542: 1541: 1520: 1519: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1460: 1457: 1447: 1446: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1368: 1361: 1350: 1343: 1326: 1323: 1296: 1295:Another source 1293: 1282: 1281: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1239: 1238: 1176: 1175: 1165: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 940: 932: 924: 917: 909: 908: 893: 794: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 770: 769: 762:on wikipedia, 759: 753:80.192.242.187 746: 731: 730: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 623: 622: 589: 586: 583: 582: 579: 578: 575: 574: 571: 570: 562:edit this list 558: 557: 556: 555: 547: 546: 545: 538: 533: 528: 523: 518: 513: 505: 504: 503: 498: 463: 462: 454: 453: 446:Low-importance 442: 436: 435: 433: 416:the discussion 402: 390: 389: 387:Low‑importance 381: 369: 368: 365: 364: 357:Low-importance 353: 347: 346: 344: 327:the discussion 313: 301: 300: 298:Low‑importance 292: 280: 279: 273: 262: 248: 247: 240:the discussion 232: 220: 219: 212:the discussion 204: 192: 191: 129: 128: 124: 123: 118: 113: 104: 103: 101: 100: 93: 88: 79: 73: 71: 70: 59: 50: 49: 46: 45: 39: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3787: 3776: 3773: 3771: 3768: 3766: 3763: 3761: 3758: 3756: 3753: 3752: 3750: 3743: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3723: 3714: 3706: 3703: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3663: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3614: 3611: 3608: 3606: 3600: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3579: 3577: 3570: 3564: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3549: 3540: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3527: 3526: 3519: 3515: 3507: 3501: 3497: 3495: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3439: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3409: 3408: 3405: 3401: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3376: 3370: 3366: 3364: 3359: 3356: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3288: 3285: 3284: 3280: 3279: 3275: 3272: 3271: 3267: 3261: 3257: 3254: 3251: 3248: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3221: 3215: 3214: 3209: 3207: 3206: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3194: 3188: 3182: 3176: 3170: 3164: 3158: 3152: 3146: 3140: 3134: 3128: 3122: 3116: 3110: 3104: 3099: 3091: 3089: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3065: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3053:FonsScientiae 3045: 3039: 3036: 3031: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2983:FonsScientiae 2980: 2977:I agree with 2975: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2957: 2955: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2934: 2931: 2925: 2919: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2901: 2897: 2895: 2894: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2860: 2858: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2805: 2798: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2776: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2766: 2761: 2754: 2752: 2751: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2736: 2733: 2730: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2715: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2704:77.176.48.240 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2643: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632:77.176.48.240 2627: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2592: 2591: 2587: 2585: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2574:87.220.201.69 2571: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2552: 2545: 2543: 2542: 2539: 2534: 2523: 2521: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2465: 2460: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2419: 2417: 2416: 2413: 2403: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2370: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2360: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2345: 2337: 2334: 2331: 2328: 2325: 2324:Latin America 2321: 2318: 2315: 2312: 2309: 2306: 2303: 2301: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2279: 2277: 2274: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2241: 2238: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2226: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2211: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2123: 2120: 2118: 2113: 2112: 2109: 2105: 2099: 2098: 2095: 2087: 2084: 2079: 2078: 2075: 2072: 2068: 2067:yellow people 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2045: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2034: 2027: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2010: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1968: 1963: 1959: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1932: 1922: 1919: 1916: 1913: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1881: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1847: 1838: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1824: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1813: 1812: 1809: 1808: 1799: 1797: 1796: 1793: 1789: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1774: 1773: 1770: 1764: 1763: 1760: 1750: 1747: 1746:84.56.240.166 1743: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1723: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1692: 1687: 1679: 1677: 1676: 1673: 1665: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1646: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1629: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1608: 1605: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1586: 1583: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1547: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1515: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1499: 1495: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1467: 1458: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1445: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1424: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1374: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1349: 1346: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1324: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1301: 1294: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1280: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1250: 1247: 1246:Deepstratagem 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1203: 1202:Deepstratagem 1198: 1197: 1194: 1193:Deepstratagem 1190: 1186: 1181: 1174: 1171: 1166: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1153: 1147: 1141: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1094:, hardly OR, 1093: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1057: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 953: 950: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 922: 918: 915: 911: 910: 906: 905: 904: 901: 897: 894: 892: 889: 885: 881: 876: 873: 872: 871: 868: 867:84.56.240.166 864: 861: 858: 855: 851: 850: 849: 846: 842: 839: 835: 834: 833: 830: 826: 821: 820: 819: 816: 811: 810: 809: 808: 805: 800: 792: 786: 783: 779: 774: 773: 772: 771: 768: 765: 760: 757: 754: 749: 748: 747: 744: 743: 740: 737: 729: 726: 721: 720: 719: 718: 715: 711: 695: 692: 687: 683: 679: 675: 674: 673: 670: 665: 664: 663: 660: 656: 655: 654: 651: 647: 646: 645: 642: 638: 634: 633: 632: 631: 628: 621: 618: 614: 610: 605: 604: 603: 602: 599: 595: 587: 569: 567: 563: 560:Feel free to 554: 551: 550: 548: 544: 543: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 517: 514: 512: 509: 508: 506: 502: 499: 496: 489: 488:Ethnic groups 482: 481: 479: 478: 477: 475: 470: 465: 464: 460: 459: 455: 451: 447: 441: 438: 437: 434: 421:Ethnic groups 417: 413: 412:ethnic groups 409: 408: 403: 400: 396: 395: 391: 385: 384:Ethnic groups 382: 379: 375: 362: 358: 352: 349: 348: 345: 328: 324: 320: 319: 314: 311: 307: 306: 302: 296: 293: 290: 286: 281: 277: 271: 263: 259: 254: 253: 245: 241: 237: 233: 230: 226: 225: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 198: 197: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 131: 130: 122: 121:Verifiability 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 108: 107: 98: 94: 92: 89: 87: 83: 80: 78: 75: 74: 68: 64: 63:Learn to edit 60: 57: 52: 51: 48: 47: 43: 37: 33: 29: 28: 19: 3729:MOS:RACECAPS 3718: 3687:AndyTheGrump 3664: 3661: 3618: 3616:sincerely 3615: 3612: 3609: 3607:<ref: --> 3601:<ref: --> 3596: 3594:<ref: --> 3588:dark skinned 3587: 3583: 3575: 3565: 3544: 3524: 3523: 3511: 3478:— Preceding 3475: 3440: 3437: 3436: 3410: 3402: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3382: 3378: 3371: 3367: 3360: 3357: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3292:— Preceding 3289: 3286: 3281: 3276: 3273: 3268: 3265: 3247:RichardWeiss 3230:94.252.4.106 3224:— Preceding 3222: 3218: 3211: 3203: 3095: 3072:— Preceding 3069: 3049: 2976: 2961: 2958:Unacceptable 2944:193.64.21.60 2938:— Preceding 2935: 2932: 2929: 2904: 2903: 2884: 2847:81.33.212.11 2836: 2802: 2799: 2787:81.33.212.11 2777: 2772: 2768: 2762: 2758: 2750: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2720:99.253.12.31 2716: 2700: 2628: 2625: 2609: 2608: 2596:Funkynusayri 2564: 2559: 2553: 2549: 2527: 2524:Goldenhawk 0 2501: 2450:Absolutely, 2423: 2408: 2395:white people 2369:brown people 2368: 2356: 2346: 2343: 2297:19th century 2283:Malayan race 2276:Brown people 2275: 2252:Brown people 2251: 2246: 2222: 2212: 2206:people, and 2192:Malayan race 2189: 2134: 2114: 2100: 2090: 2059:white people 2055:Black people 2030: 2018: 2015:brown people 2014: 1982:White people 1978:Black people 1945:White people 1941:Black people 1928: 1901:19th century 1887:Malayan race 1880:Brown people 1879: 1856:Brown people 1855: 1850: 1842: 1828: 1814: 1805: 1803: 1784: 1775: 1765: 1755: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1683: 1668: 1641: 1632: 1611: 1589: 1567: 1556:White people 1543: 1524: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1462: 1448: 1436: 1398:brown people 1397: 1394:white people 1390:black people 1387: 1379: 1369: 1365: 1362: 1358: 1351: 1347: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1332: 1328: 1310: 1298: 1283: 1255: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1199: 1179: 1177: 1150: 1132: 1104: 1064:Afro-Mexican 1061: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 949:BooBooSpooki 943: 935: 927: 920: 913: 883: 829:BooBooSpooki 804:BooBooSpooki 796: 745: 732: 706: 685: 677: 636: 624: 591: 588:Colour blind 559: 540: 494: 480:Meta-tasks: 466: 445: 405: 356: 332:Anthropology 323:Anthropology 316: 295:Anthropology 276:WikiProjects 243: 215: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 105: 30:This is the 3722:Treetoes023 3683:WP:NOTFORUM 2926:Incoherence 2841:—Preceding 2813:multiracial 2781:—Preceding 2568:—Preceding 2504:—Preceding 2478:—Preceding 2428:—Preceding 2391:pink people 2344:etc etc... 2128:Wiktionary 1846:WP:NOT#DICT 637:song lyrics 266:Start-class 159:free images 42:not a forum 3749:Categories 3667:TudorTulok 3046:Brown race 3006:Dougweller 2809:South Asia 2484:68.158.2.6 2434:Mutt696969 2293:Australoid 2196:Australoid 2125:Knowledge 2094:Muntuwandi 2063:red people 1897:Australoid 1807:Yuser31415 1363:Racialism 1000:bruinmense 939:Elizabeth. 841:0415178266 615:policies. 483:Place the 3620:Sassysoso 3548:Sassysoso 3525:Steel1943 3463:Pinkbeast 3419:Pinkbeast 3325:Pinkbeast 3298:Sorberino 2804:Hispanics 2452:SqueakBox 2420:Criticism 2412:SqueakBox 2359:SqueakBox 2319:in Brazil 2225:SqueakBox 2108:SqueakBox 2083:SqueakBox 2071:SqueakBox 2033:SqueakBox 1949:WP:DICDEF 1923:in Brazil 1831:SqueakBox 1825:Unprotect 1817:SqueakBox 1792:SqueakBox 1672:SqueakBox 1635:SqueakBox 1571:SqueakBox 1466:SqueakBox 1451:SqueakBox 1423:SqueakBox 1402:political 1287:SqueakBox 1258:SqueakBox 1189:Hispanics 1129:straw men 1120:SqueakBox 1096:SqueakBox 1068:SqueakBox 931:00019720. 793:Coloureds 764:SqueakBox 714:SqueakBox 669:SqueakBox 650:SqueakBox 627:SqueakBox 598:SqueakBox 594:user page 493:template 99:if needed 82:Be polite 32:talk page 3636:WP:SYNTH 3480:unsigned 3445:RJBowman 3306:contribs 3294:unsigned 3253:contribs 3226:unsigned 3074:unsigned 3029:Eurasian 2940:unsigned 2843:unsigned 2821:coloreds 2783:unsigned 2688:FunkMonk 2570:unsigned 2506:unsigned 2492:contribs 2480:unsigned 2442:contribs 2430:unsigned 2305:Coloured 2202:people, 2200:Coloured 2000:or even 1909:Coloured 1711:strongly 1418:cultural 1414:societal 1272:civility 996:bruinman 986:I b.nw. 880:Coloured 236:deletion 208:deletion 67:get help 40:This is 38:article. 3733:Rsk6400 3644:Rsk6400 3569:Rsk6400 3554:Rsk6400 3002:WP:NOTE 2817:mulatto 2714:Guest) 2464:ju66l3r 2374:ju66l3r 2350:Lukas19 2260:epithet 2247:An ex: 2237:Lukas19 2180:" and " 2146:octopus 2139:octopus 2102:notice" 2044:Uncle G 1967:Uncle G 1962:Ju66l3r 1953:ju66l3r 1864:epithet 1719:Uncle G 1661:ju66l3r 1625:ju66l3r 1604:ju66l3r 1582:ju66l3r 1560:ju66l3r 1514:ju66l3r 1481:ju66l3r 1459:Cleanup 1441:ju66l3r 1433:WP:LEAD 1317:ju66l3r 1304:ju66l3r 1276:ju66l3r 1170:ju66l3r 1137:Uncle G 1109:Uncle G 1082:Uncle G 1012:Laurens 900:Uncle G 888:ju66l3r 845:Uncle G 815:Uncle G 782:ju66l3r 758:JemmyH. 725:Uncle G 691:Uncle G 659:Uncle G 641:Uncle G 617:Uncle G 476:tasks: 448:on the 359:on the 165:WP refs 153:scholar 3438:QUOTE: 3320:white. 3190:, and 3034:(talk) 2998:WP:AFD 2679:orange 2673:, and 2667:yellow 2642:Guest) 2399:Carwil 2317:Pardos 2311:Latino 2256:racial 2216:Carwil 2208:Pardos 2204:Latino 2198:race, 2178:colour 2159:colour 2135:denote 2023:Carwil 2006:Carwil 1931:Carwil 1921:Pardos 1915:Latino 1860:racial 1691:Bwithh 1591:stay. 1536:(talk) 1533:Friday 1410:ethnic 1406:racial 1388:"Like 984:bruin. 980:af:HAT 778:German 739:(talk) 736:Friday 272:scale. 137:Google 3584:Brown 3576:brown 3026:Afro- 2963:here. 2671:brown 2659:black 2655:White 2651:color 2182:color 2163:color 1980:. If 1742:brown 1416:, or 1400:is a 1231:Help! 1218:tell 1158:Help! 1058:Brown 1008:brain 1004:brein 936:bruin 928:Bruin 921:bruin 914:bruin 710:WP:RS 180:JSTOR 141:books 95:Seek 3737:talk 3691:talk 3671:talk 3648:talk 3642:. -- 3624:talk 3558:talk 3532:talk 3488:talk 3467:talk 3449:talk 3423:talk 3329:talk 3302:talk 3250:talk 3234:talk 3082:talk 3057:talk 3010:talk 2987:talk 2969:talk 2948:talk 2913:talk 2851:talk 2829:(𒁳) 2791:talk 2744:talk 2724:talk 2708:talk 2692:talk 2663:gray 2636:talk 2617:talk 2600:talk 2578:talk 2514:talk 2488:talk 2438:talk 2291:The 2281:The 2266:and 2169:and 2161:and 2065:and 2057:and 1895:The 1885:The 1870:and 1778:Alai 1769:Alai 1477:cool 1392:and 1313:here 1187:and 875:This 862:and 856:and 838:ISBN 611:and 536:Iyer 244:Keep 242:was 216:Keep 214:was 173:FENS 147:news 84:and 3603:--> 3586:or 2825:dab 2819:) " 2675:red 2665:), 2557:: 2556:--> 2532:Tea 1996:or 1986:Bai 1943:or 1800:AfD 1531:. 1225:Guy 1180:but 1152:Guy 1133:you 884:not 678:not 564:or 440:Low 351:Low 187:TWL 3751:: 3739:) 3731:. 3693:) 3685:. 3673:) 3650:) 3626:) 3578:. 3560:) 3534:) 3490:) 3469:) 3451:) 3443:-- 3425:) 3331:) 3308:) 3304:• 3236:) 3196:. 3184:, 3178:, 3172:, 3166:, 3160:, 3154:, 3148:, 3142:, 3136:, 3130:, 3124:, 3118:, 3112:, 3106:, 3084:) 3059:) 3012:) 3004:. 2989:) 2971:) 2950:) 2915:) 2907:-- 2853:) 2793:) 2746:) 2726:) 2710:) 2694:) 2669:, 2653:: 2638:) 2619:) 2602:) 2580:) 2516:) 2494:) 2490:• 2444:) 2440:• 2194:, 2173:. 2165:, 2119:: 1790:, 1412:, 1408:, 1404:, 1356:. 1222:. 1220:us 1212:we 1066:, 1010:. 988:1. 686:is 568:. 491:}} 485:{{ 167:) 65:; 3735:( 3724:: 3720:@ 3689:( 3669:( 3646:( 3622:( 3571:: 3567:@ 3556:( 3550:: 3546:@ 3530:( 3486:( 3465:( 3447:( 3421:( 3327:( 3300:( 3232:( 3080:( 3055:( 3008:( 2985:( 2967:( 2946:( 2911:( 2849:( 2815:( 2789:( 2742:( 2722:( 2706:( 2702:( 2690:( 2681:) 2634:( 2615:( 2598:( 2576:( 2537:© 2512:( 2486:( 2436:( 2270:. 1874:. 1233:) 1229:( 1160:) 1156:( 452:. 363:. 278:: 246:. 218:. 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 69:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index