1194:
damage from oxidative stress. And Goji berries have a very high level of antioxidants as well as vitamin C and melatonin. Obviously there are health benefits in those fruits. The issue is that previous article was making it seem like there are no scientific studies showing that Goji berries increase antioxidants in blood and protect against oxidative stress. And all claims (not some) are wrong. Despite as of 2022, there are a number of studies showing that they do have health benefits. Not all of them are scams or exaggerated claims. It's not disputed that Goji berries have high antioxidants levels And studies have shown concrete benefits to them. I recently added in 2 studies and mentioned the
Berries have high antioxidants levels as they were completely absent in previous Article.
1807:
nutritional info in Goji considering it's not a difficult soft science. Measuring the macronutrient profile of a food, is perhaps the easiest and most fool proof thing in food sciences. We are not arguing if vitamin C is helpful or not. We are arguing whether Goji has high level of vitamin C, etc and if WebMD is trustworthy on such info. Given that USDA database (a reliable source according to you) confirms and supports the information in WebMD about the nutritional values like high levels of vitamin A, fiber, antixoxidants, etc. I think it's obvious that WebMD is proven correct about that specific info, unless you're also claiming that USDA is now lying along with WebMD. Which is completely unlikely.
920:
1284:@Hipal that's false. The studies are reliable and uses decent methodology. A 90-day double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 150 older adults, found that goji berry supplementing had helped increase blood antioxidant levels, protects from hypopigmentation, and helped to soften fatty protein deposits behind the retina. It found that antixoxidants didn't increase in placebo or control groups. But risen in groups taking goji berries and it protects against macular hypopigmentation.
325:
1215:
and outdated. Example - A newly released 2022 study found that consuming a handful of dried goji berries five times a week, can "increase the density of 'sunblock' pigments" in the eyes. The researchers from the
University of California (Davis), explained that the antioxidants found in Goji berries, lutein and zeaxanthin can filter out harmful blue light and hence “provide antioxidant protection” and prevent some eye disease, specifically macular degeneration, in middle-aged people.
910:
889:
733:
712:
1764:
it and published the information in journals which are referred to by professional dieticians and scientists. Even USDA database PROVES that they are indeed correct about this so don't know why this is even debatable. Since we cannot agree, I will take it to a noticeboard as the info is factual and the sources are perfectly acceptable. WebMD never said it cures
Diabetes, etc but observing that some people believe it can help ease their conditions.
507:
231:
1093:
839:
821:
316:
389:
743:
1015:
994:
379:
358:
1659:
goji berries in USDA database can cheat label claims as they're assessed by USDA (who don't just take their word), and the FDA is the one responsible for the majority food products and their labeling. The FDA guarantees that most prepared foods, such as packaged dried Goji berries are properly labeled.
1912:
I did put in a discussions to add in basic nutrition information. So many top sources like
Italian scientists and USDA are saying the same thing. I wanted to add them in except I waited over 10 days and still nobody replied. That's stonewalling where you just revert edits and then tell others to wait
1609:
WebMD and
Healthline are not reliable sources, especially for nutrition analysis, as they are written by bloggers and are not peer-reviewed or subjected to editorial scrutiny. From where would they obtain such detailed analytical nutrition information? For Knowledge (XXG) food and nutrition articles,
1538:
So if you think it is not original research and or the 2018 study is wrong, then we Just cannot agree on talk and so I am fine to take this to further channels. As Don't want to waste my time arguing with someone who seems invested in defending an original research and claiming that proper randomised
1214:
There's actually a large number of modern studies (so Many to list) showing conclusively the benefits of antioxidants against free radicals and macular degeneration. To make sweeping premature claims that the
Natural antioxidants in Goji berries, have absolutely zero health benefits is just illogical
1863:
I am currently on my mobile phone so using the mobile browser and I didn't see that messages. But on my desktop, it shows that indeed. My apologies. However it writes "calculated from label by NDL staff; Calculated from label claim/serving (g or %RDI). Do you really think NDL staff would mislead the
1846:
the analyses were not determined by USDA typical procedures, but rather are (stated under the column "Derived by") as a) "Based on another form of the food or similar food" (estimated water content), b) a "label claim", or c) "calculated", i.e., none of the values shown were actually measured by the
1763:
Finding the nutritional values, isn't even rocket science. It's basic hard science where it's not hard for any food professionals to attain it. There's no credible motive for WebMD and
Healthline to go fake the nutritional macronutrient profile of goji. Especially When it's likely labs have analysed
1694:
USDA shows that WebMD and
Healthline are not at all wrong about those facts and are professional enough. WebMD even caters and are trusted by medical professionals and is a reputable massive corporation, so I highly disagree they are not reliable sources when it comes to these basic information that
1436:
Also we know that Goji has vitamin A and C which is good for iron absorption and eye health. Clinical studies on vitamin C literally recommend that children and adults have a minimum intake of these vitamins because they are very helpful to the body. There are many clinical studies showing that Goji
1427:
A 2018 study concluded that extracts of L. barbarum (Goji berries) had shown "potent free radical scavenging activity" and protected against DNA damage caused by free radicals. It suggested that suggested that L. barbarum extracts could be used as dietary supplements to reduce the harmful effects of
2080:
It's not medical science. Just normal hard food science. And not a particularly difficult science like ground breaking novel research. It's merely analysing the nutrition of goji berries using straightforward science. My source is published in
Italian Journal of Food Science and it's silly to claim
1806:
Also it's a straw argument to say that WebMD is wrong for observing that people use Goji to help their diabetes. The thread was not about that but only about the importance on adding the minimal nutritional information of Goji. It is dubious to think that WebMD and
Healthline are unable to know the
1772:
And I think you are just confusing medicine with food. A healthy diet isn't formally medicine, yet it still protects against many diseases. Eating enough fiber helps with diabetes as it slows the absorption of sugar. Eating enough anti-inflammatory natural antixoxidants, helps to reduce excess free
1302:
A 2018 professional study also concluded that extracts of L. barbarum (Goji berries) had shown "potent free radical scavenging activity" and protected against DNA damage caused by free radicals. It suggested that suggested that L. barbarum extracts could be used as dietary supplements to reduce the
1925:
Secondly USDA doesn't just trust anyone. They likely reviewed the source and judged it as reliable enough to put it in their official database.. I already stated that reasoning on Talk but what I don't approve is being told to wait for discussion to end, yet I waited patiently for over a week just
1776:
Goji is simply a single holistic tool that allows diabetic people to reach a healthy diet that has properties that help maintain good sugar levels and ease oxidation damage etc. There is a nuance that certain healthy food can help prevent illnesses or worsening conditions that typically occur from
1958:
Somehow this user was able to come along and promote his business in a very slick way. I hope someone with a proper gatekeeping stance will take this up. I'm tempted to just delete the image out of a trial page just to see what the response would be, but that doesn't sound like the best approach.
1717:
which apply to any topic concerning human health. The Healthline article says "Goji berries are tiny red fruits packed with antioxidants and powerful medicinal properties." - one needs to read no further: that kind of nonsense statement reveals ignorance about what is an "antioxidant" (dried goji
1658:
It is written by by Rachael Link, MS, RD on September 8, 2020 and Medically reviewed by Amy Richter, RD, Nutrition. I believe University is what taught them these knowledge in which in turn, Universities gained it from scientific consensus and research. Also I highly doubt commercially sold dried
1193:
How can there be no health benefits? In this modern age where science has shown antioxidants as very useful to protect against free radicals and macular degeneration. It's not even disputed by any reputable institution that antioxidants like beta carotene, etc are important to protest against DNA
1518:
It's original research to use sources back from 2007, and claim the sources themselves are saying - (as of 2018), no studies confirmed effectiveness of extracts in goji). The sources doesn't even say 2018 anywhere because none of them are from 2018. It's obviously original research to make that
1420:
Because it is wrong as , the given sources does not say that at all. Secondly the given sources are like from 2007 and are heavily outdated and cannot support that statement at all. It is original research to go make a claim when none of the Given sources are actually saying those exact words.
1946:
1827:
Seeing you haven't replied back after a week. I added USDA database which btw is a very professional detailed analysis released in 2019. I highly doubt USDA will mislead the public about this and it is obvious they used professional science to get the exact analysis of amino acids. I correctly
1951:
The first issue I have with these images is that they are pointless. It's virtually the same image of a vial with a slightly different color, but what I found unencylopedic, is that at the time, I was able to ascertain that the user had (and STILL has) at least one website where such vials of
1884:
In addition, I found this Italian in-depth analysis. They seem competent enough to measure it and their findings that are published in journals closely match my other sources. It seems obvious they are correct unless you think there's a conspiracy within USDA and Italy to also lie about all
1161:
The problem with the term "Asia" is that it refers to a vast region and doesn't give clear specificity of the actual range(s) of origin. A plurality of sources do not agree that such a broad swath from S.E. Europe to E. Asia represents its native range. For example, an older version of
1929:
You need to explain and show proof that USDA is irresponsible. I don't believe they would publish data for Goji berries and not check the sources beforehand. They're not that incompetent. Additional Italian scientists also confirms much of what USDA is saying. Are they all lying?
1741:"people have used goji berries to try to treat many common health problems like diabetes, high blood pressure, fever, and age-related eye problems," suggesting efficacy for these diseases, but there are no published reviews for such claims requiring the strongest evidence.
2087:
Fresh goji berries have 77.4Â % moisture, 1.1Â % fats, 2.5Â % proteins, 15.3Â % carbohydrates and 2.9Â % fibre. In dried goji berries, 4.4Â % fats, 10.2% proteins, 61.3Â % carbohydrates and 11.4Â % fibre were found. Similar results on dried goji were reported by ENDES et al.
1864:
public by taking any analysis at face value. They obviously know who created the analysis and trusted them enough to publish it on their official database to the public. So I still think USDA database should be shown as they're reliable enough to be responsible here.
2042:
Also I explained that USDA doesn't just trust anyone and they're speculating that USDA is irresponsible.. Obviously USDA doesn't just trust anyone and recognise the source as reliable enough to be published on their database that informs the public.
1938:
In March/April of 2013, I did a makeover of the nutrition info boxes for as many foods as I could. As I did this, I noticed what appeared to be a repetition of images of vials of extracts/oils. Most of these images were added in 2013 by one user
1916:
Yet I am correct. Italian in-depth analysis showed the Berries provide significant amounts of dietary fibre and zeaxanthin and can be declared on the label as a potential source of vitamins E and C. I don't believe they would lie.
2240:
1359:
That is not what the policy says. Knowledge (XXG) is a large site and volunteer time is limited - if you have seen content that doesn't meet our policies that is a reason to fix that content, not to add more noncompliant stuff.
1780:
Controlled research with good methodology, shows people with macular degeneration and Diabetics who eat goji, also fare better than those who don't. So there's promise that they can play a key role in helping people.
329:
1566:
It's not even disputed by anyone that Goji berries have high levels of antioxidants and vitamin C, etc. Removing the information because WebMD is apparently banned for Knowledge (XXG). Is arbitrary and questionable.
1654:@Zefr Respectfully I don't think you are familiar with Healthline and WebMD. Typically the articles are written by people with actual medical professional credentials. Not just anybody. An example is this article -
1492:
None of the sources are even from 2018 let alone actually say that entire statement. Show me a source that specifically mention 2018. It is original research to say something that the sources are not saying 2018.
1519:
statement. Also it is outdated information to say (no clinical effectiveness of such extracts has been confirmed') as one 2018 research found compound in goji helped protect against free radicals and DNA damage.
2230:
1189:
The article was like 85% a smear campaign against Goji. The previous editors mostly talked about how it's a scam and made sweeping claims that all health claims are false and it has zero proven health benefits.
1261:
You're right, I think a true unbiased opinion should at least provide a basic proven peer reviewed nutritional profile of them. It might not be a miraculous fruit, but it's still a fruit like many others.
1452:
The article doesn't say 'zero clinical studies showing any benefits', it says 'no clinical effectiveness of such extracts has been confirmed' - please don't move the goalposts and then declare victory. -
153:
2245:
656:
project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
2172:
species also referred to as "wolfberry," but whenever someone searches "wolfberry", they simply receive this page as a result with no indication that any non-Asian species of that name exist.
1412:@MrOllie I don't want an edit war so am addressing this here. I removed original research claiming that as of 2018, there have been zero clinical studies showing any benefits in Goji berries.
1386:
I am also a volunteer here. There's nothing wrong in getting a second opinion or village pump if I believe the study is solid yet cannot be agreed by the usual editors on these talk pages.
2295:
670:
1345:
Actually well designed studies can be an exception especially if you ensure readers know about the methodology being used. I seen many articles citing single studies so it's allowable.
635:
494:
1166:
gives a confusing mention of both Turkey and Kazakhstan, while the newer version winnows it more accurately to one region, namely S. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Xinjiang.
1952:
extracts and oils were sold. So to me, this is more of a quasi advertisement than it is a valuable addition to any of the articles thusly modified. It has a spammy quality to it.
1690:
Also lastly the USDA database seems to validate WebMD and Healthline as sources that are correct. Indeed USDA also shows the berries are high in vitamin C, A, Fiber, Iron, etc.
1558:
For a food article, there need to be mention that Goji berries have high levels of antioxidants, vitamin C and A, as well as iron and fiber. Why is such information forbidden?
1576:
They are reliable sources that have no reason to lie about the obvious facts that Goji berries have lots of iron, vitamin C and A, etc. And my edit should be included back in.
1299:
Another randomized controlled study with 114 subjects who had early macular degeneration, found that daily goji berry supplements had improved the density of macular pigment.
2310:
1060:
1847:
USDA. The report is simply a reference from a commercial product, and therefore is not a reliable source and the data may be incorrect or misleading. Removing the table.
855:
449:
1787:
1828:
attributed the source as USDA and their information is reliable if it's published in their official database. I am willing to take the time to discuss if you disagree.
2255:
439:
657:
2290:
2280:
966:
664:
2037:
1920:
1891:
846:
826:
147:
79:
1489:
Give me a source that says (AS OF 2018) no clinical benefits have been found. None of the sources says that as of 2018, no clinical benefits had been found.
2305:
2260:
2225:
1070:
1036:
1027:
999:
415:
1437:
is high in vitamin C so the statement that Goji berries components haven't been confirmed as helpful, is not Just original research but false information.
242:
803:
1570:
I also like to ask for an exception as it is highly unlikely that WebMD will lie about this. No reason at all. Other websites also say the same thing.
2010:
976:
2250:
1955:
I know, it took me ten years to post this, but in 2013 I saw that someone has started a discussion on the matter, so I lost interest and moved on.
85:
2285:
2235:
1784:
Example is a systematic review which showed Goji Berry (Lycium barbarum) has the potential to be effective in the treatment of diabetes Mellitus.
517:
402:
363:
2270:
793:
257:
2215:
252:
2275:
2173:
2031:
No it wasn't. Not once did the other person even explain or give any opinion at all about the source on the Italian study that you deleted.
1808:
1790:
30:
769:
1965:
I remember your diligence when it came to people making changes inappropriately. I'm hoping you get to see this and respond in some way.
2300:
2121:
I have fully protected the article for 24 hours to stop sustained edit warring on this article. If you cannot come to agreement, seek a
2062:
problems outlined above. You must read and understand this guideline and respect its requirements for high quality, secondary sourcing.
2103:
942:
2089:
2044:
1995:
1894:
1865:
1829:
1788:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319200037_Goji_Berry_Lycium_Barbarum_in_the_treatment_of_diabetes_melitus_a_systematic_review
1696:
1676:
1577:
1540:
1494:
1438:
1387:
1346:
1309:
1219:
1198:
2153:, it is seen that "wolfberry" is for various specis of Lucium, not only goij. It also says that barbarum is called "matrimony vine".
248:
99:
104:
20:
2137:
1985:
1737:. The individual studies you have tried to use are low-quality, preliminary research projects which do not meet MEDRS standards.
251:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
74:
2265:
2220:
1611:
756:
717:
338:
2038:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321007006_Nutritional_evaluation_of_fresh_and_dried_goji_berries_cultivated_in_Italy
1921:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321007006_Nutritional_evaluation_of_fresh_and_dried_goji_berries_cultivated_in_Italy
1892:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321007006_Nutritional_evaluation_of_fresh_and_dried_goji_berries_cultivated_in_Italy
933:
894:
65:
1216:
941:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
854:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
414:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1424:
Lastly it is also a false claim. In 2018, there have been well designed clinical studies confirming benefits from Goji.
44:
646:
2150:
230:
185:
168:
109:
1709:
You won't find experienced medical editors here accepting WebMD or Healthline as reliable sources compliant with
135:
1138:
688:
211:
1626:
We don't have a nutrition section for goji because there is no reliable source available for that information.
2177:
1812:
1794:
344:
1730:
1973:
1738:
2093:
2048:
1999:
1898:
1869:
1833:
1700:
1680:
1618:, i.e., not the usual rigorous, comprehensive nutrient analysis typical of USDA work, such as we have for
1581:
1544:
1498:
1442:
1391:
1350:
1313:
1267:
1223:
1202:
55:
2158:
1695:
they likely sourced it from nutritional journals like every other licensed dietician and medical expert.
768:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1843:
1714:
1691:
1615:
70:
2154:
129:
2135:
1981:
1940:
1263:
851:
315:
1968:
1169:
I would suggest using GRIN as a more up-to-date source. The article should be updated accordingly.
1126:
1119:
1114:
1109:
202:
198:
194:
190:
161:
642:
1170:
1144:
1032:
216:
125:
2059:
1710:
1592:
1324:
1240:
2111:
2067:
2018:
1734:
1600:
1458:
1365:
1332:
909:
888:
540:
506:
51:
1616:
only a preliminary, "label claim" nutrient analysis from a marketed dried goji berry product
1174:
1140:
1092:
213:
175:
2126:
1571:
1477:
Don't move goal post? You should really take your own advice as that is what you are doing.
1195:
2130:
1977:
1248:
2122:
1533:
1431:
1306:
732:
711:
2194:
1852:
1746:
1631:
599:
2011:
Knowledge (XXG):Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Nutritional_information_(Healthline/USDA)
1660:
1539:
controlled studies are not permitted on Knowledge (XXG), despite I know that's wrong.
1217:
https://thenewdaily.com.au/life/wellbeing/2022/01/23/goji-berries-protect-ageing-eyes/
1035:. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
2209:
748:
2107:
2063:
2014:
1719:
1596:
1454:
1361:
1328:
925:
565:
1655:
141:
838:
820:
625:
394:
1722:
1244:
915:
738:
384:
2190:
1962:
1848:
1742:
1726:
1627:
1294:
569:
1303:
harmful effects of oxidative stress in athletes after intensive exercise.
1031:, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to
2189:
which hopefully gives a wider perspective of US species and varieties.
742:
388:
2241:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1934:
Image with caption: "Oil extracted from the seeds of Lycium barbarum"
1733:
to support the supposed "medicinal properties" - a term reserved for
1619:
765:
577:
1692:
https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/173032/nutrients
938:
761:
641:
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
621:
603:
573:
557:
553:
549:
411:
1773:
radicals. Making sure you have enough vitamin C prevents scurvy.
1142:
629:
595:
561:
545:
407:
378:
357:
215:
24:
1969:
An example website using the same image, with the same username
1562:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Goji&diff=1068113113
1416:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Goji&diff=1068098575
1243:
refs are required. Those don't appear to meet that criteria. --
1014:
993:
2168:
This is an important point. There are multiple North American
1145:
1086:
309:
217:
15:
2231:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1729:, but likely no other dietary antioxidants) and there is no
1595:. We have sourcing requirements that must be complied with.
2198:
2181:
2162:
2139:
2115:
2097:
2071:
2052:
2022:
2003:
1989:
1902:
1873:
1856:
1837:
1816:
1798:
1750:
1704:
1684:
1635:
1604:
1585:
1548:
1502:
1462:
1446:
1395:
1369:
1354:
1336:
1317:
1271:
1252:
1227:
1206:
1178:
1572:
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/goji-berry#benefits
1196:
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/goji-berry#benefits
2186:
2009:
This was explained to you in the section you opened at
1561:
1428:
oxidative stress in athletes after intensive exercise.
1415:
484:
479:
474:
469:
287:
1623:
160:
2246:
C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1534:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977381/
1432:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977381/
1307:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977381/
1913:for consensus. And Not reply back for over a week.
937:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
850:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
760:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
406:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
261:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
1661:
https://www.nal.usda.gov/legacy/aglaw/food-labeling
174:
665:Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested images of food
2296:C-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
1327:. Single studies simply do not pass that bar. -
864:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Alternative medicine
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1656:https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/goji-berry
1045:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Dietary Supplements
1554:Really? there needs to be a Nutrition chapter
8:
2081:they're unable to even do such a basic task.
2311:Mid-importance Dietary supplement articles
1971:
1591:There is really no substitute for reading
988:
883:
815:
706:
457:
424:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Food and drink
352:
266:
225:
1907:
1295:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21169874/
867:Template:WikiProject Alternative medicine
1048:Template:WikiProject Dietary Supplements
990:
885:
817:
708:
354:
313:
2256:Low-importance Food and drink articles
2226:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
2104:Knowledge (XXG):Biomedical information
1947:User contributions for Iterinanttrader
2291:Mid-importance China-related articles
2281:C-Class Alternative medicine articles
7:
1713:. You should read through MEDRS and
931:This article is within the scope of
844:This article is within the scope of
754:This article is within the scope of
400:This article is within the scope of
2306:C-Class Dietary supplement articles
2261:WikiProject Food and drink articles
663:Provide photographs and images for
514:Here are some tasks you can do for
427:Template:WikiProject Food and drink
23:for discussing improvements to the
778:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Plants
14:
951:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject China
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1091:
1013:
992:
918:
908:
887:
847:WikiProject Alternative medicine
837:
819:
741:
731:
710:
669:Consider joining this project's
505:
387:
377:
356:
323:
314:
229:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2251:C-Class Food and drink articles
2106:explicitly includes nutrition.
1908:Don't revert and not reply back
1065:This article has been rated as
1028:WikiProject Dietary Supplements
971:This article has been rated as
798:This article has been rated as
691:from the project's tasks pages.
634:Participate in project-related
444:This article has been rated as
2286:C-Class China-related articles
2236:C-Class level-5 vital articles
1612:USDA FoodData Central resource
654:{{WikiProject Food and drink}}
343:It is of interest to multiple
247:nominee, but did not meet the
243:Natural sciences good articles
1:
2271:Mid-importance plant articles
1926:for a reply. That is wrong.
1272:13:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
945:and see a list of open tasks.
870:Alternative medicine articles
858:and see a list of open tasks.
772:and see a list of open tasks.
418:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
2216:Former good article nominees
2163:18:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
2140:15:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
2116:13:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
2098:13:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
2072:13:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
2053:13:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
2023:12:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
2004:08:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
1990:15:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
1903:04:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
1874:04:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
1857:04:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
1838:03:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
1817:06:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
1799:05:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
1751:03:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
1731:sufficient clinical evidence
1705:01:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
1685:01:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
1636:19:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1605:18:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1586:18:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1549:18:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1503:18:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1463:17:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1447:17:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1396:17:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1370:17:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1355:17:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1337:17:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1318:16:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1253:16:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1228:16:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1207:15:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
2276:WikiProject Plants articles
1842:Inspecting the USDA report
1179:23:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1051:Dietary supplement articles
781:Template:WikiProject Plants
2327:
2301:WikiProject China articles
1071:project's importance scale
977:project's importance scale
954:Template:WikiProject China
804:project's importance scale
518:WikiProject Food and drink
492:To edit this page, select
450:project's importance scale
403:WikiProject Food and drink
255:. Editors may also seek a
1064:
1008:
970:
903:
832:
797:
726:
461:Food and Drink task list:
456:
443:
372:
351:
269:
265:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2199:18:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
2182:13:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
649:to learn how to do this.
2151:official classification
2058:That cite has the same
430:Food and drink articles
2266:C-Class plant articles
2221:C-Class vital articles
1622:nutrition information
957:China-related articles
687:Note: These lists are
612:articles currently at
586:articles currently at
534:Status or below up to
75:avoid personal attacks
1039:for more information.
671:Assessment task force
337:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
330:level-5 vital article
249:good article criteria
100:Neutral point of view
1941:User:Itineranttrader
1408:No original research
861:Alternative medicine
852:Alternative medicine
827:Alternative medicine
636:deletion discussions
295:Good article nominee
105:No original research
1184:No health benefits?
1042:Dietary Supplements
1033:dietary supplements
1000:Dietary Supplements
530:articles currently
2127:dispute resolution
1777:unhealthy diets.
1735:prescription drugs
757:WikiProject Plants
647:WP:Handling trivia
541:Agaricus bisporus
339:content assessment
288:September 14, 2006
270:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
1992:
1976:comment added by
1718:berries may have
1624:here (see table).
1151:
1150:
1132:
1131:
1085:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1077:
1076:
987:
986:
983:
982:
934:WikiProject China
882:
881:
878:
877:
814:
813:
810:
809:
705:
704:
701:
700:
697:
696:
684:
683:
544:(i.e. mushroom),
526:Help bring these
308:
307:
304:
303:
224:
223:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2318:
1157:Ambiguous Origin
1146:
1106:
1105:
1095:
1087:
1053:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1017:
1010:
1009:
1004:
996:
989:
959:
958:
955:
952:
949:
928:
923:
922:
921:
912:
905:
904:
899:
891:
884:
872:
871:
868:
865:
862:
841:
834:
833:
823:
816:
786:
785:
782:
779:
776:
751:
746:
745:
735:
728:
727:
722:
714:
707:
692:
509:
501:
500:
458:
432:
431:
428:
425:
422:
397:
392:
391:
381:
374:
373:
368:
360:
353:
336:
327:
326:
319:
318:
310:
290:
267:
233:
226:
218:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2326:
2325:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2206:
2205:
2147:
1936:
1910:
1610:we rely on the
1556:
1410:
1186:
1164:Malus domestica
1159:
1147:
1141:
1100:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1002:
956:
953:
950:
947:
946:
924:
919:
917:
897:
869:
866:
863:
860:
859:
783:
780:
777:
774:
773:
747:
740:
720:
693:
686:
680:
677:in this section
610:High Importance
510:
489:
429:
426:
423:
420:
419:
393:
386:
366:
334:
324:
286:
220:
219:
214:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2324:
2322:
2314:
2313:
2308:
2303:
2298:
2293:
2288:
2283:
2278:
2273:
2268:
2263:
2258:
2253:
2248:
2243:
2238:
2233:
2228:
2223:
2218:
2208:
2207:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2187:See this edit,
2174:162.191.93.162
2146:
2143:
2119:
2118:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2075:
2074:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2026:
2025:
1935:
1932:
1909:
1906:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1809:49.186.234.210
1791:49.186.234.210
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1555:
1552:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1466:
1465:
1409:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1340:
1339:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1275:
1274:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1191:
1190:
1185:
1182:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1143:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1102:
1101:
1096:
1090:
1083:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1067:Mid-importance
1063:
1057:
1056:
1054:
1018:
1006:
1005:
1003:Mid‑importance
997:
985:
984:
981:
980:
973:Mid-importance
969:
963:
962:
960:
943:the discussion
930:
929:
913:
901:
900:
898:Mid‑importance
892:
880:
879:
876:
875:
873:
856:the discussion
842:
830:
829:
824:
812:
811:
808:
807:
800:Mid-importance
796:
790:
789:
787:
784:plant articles
770:the discussion
753:
752:
736:
724:
723:
721:Mid‑importance
715:
703:
702:
699:
698:
695:
694:
685:
682:
681:
679:
678:
667:
661:
650:
639:
632:
606:
600:French cuisine
584:Top Importance
580:
528:Top Importance
523:
512:
511:
504:
499:
498:
488:
487:
482:
477:
472:
466:
463:
462:
454:
453:
446:Low-importance
442:
436:
435:
433:
421:Food and drink
416:the discussion
399:
398:
382:
370:
369:
367:Low‑importance
364:Food and drink
361:
349:
348:
342:
320:
306:
305:
302:
301:
298:
291:
283:
282:
279:
276:
272:
271:
263:
262:
234:
222:
221:
212:
210:
209:
206:
205:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2323:
2312:
2309:
2307:
2304:
2302:
2299:
2297:
2294:
2292:
2289:
2287:
2284:
2282:
2279:
2277:
2274:
2272:
2269:
2267:
2264:
2262:
2259:
2257:
2254:
2252:
2249:
2247:
2244:
2242:
2239:
2237:
2234:
2232:
2229:
2227:
2224:
2222:
2219:
2217:
2214:
2213:
2211:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2144:
2142:
2141:
2138:
2136:
2134:
2133:
2128:
2124:
2123:third opinion
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2040:
2039:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1970:
1966:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1953:
1949:
1948:
1944:
1942:
1933:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1905:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1893:
1883:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1845:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1789:
1785:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1721:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1693:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1662:
1657:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1574:
1573:
1568:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1553:
1551:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1536:
1535:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1490:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1434:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1422:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1407:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1297:
1296:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1260:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1197:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1167:
1165:
1156:
1154:
1136:
1135:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1094:
1089:
1088:
1072:
1068:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1001:
998:
995:
991:
978:
974:
968:
965:
964:
961:
944:
940:
936:
935:
927:
916:
914:
911:
907:
906:
902:
896:
893:
890:
886:
874:
857:
853:
849:
848:
843:
840:
836:
835:
831:
828:
825:
822:
818:
805:
801:
795:
792:
791:
788:
771:
767:
763:
759:
758:
750:
749:Plants portal
744:
739:
737:
734:
730:
729:
725:
719:
716:
713:
709:
690:
676:
675:project ideas
672:
668:
666:
662:
659:
655:
651:
648:
644:
640:
637:
633:
631:
627:
623:
619:
616:status up to
615:
611:
607:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:status up to
589:
585:
581:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
542:
537:
533:
529:
525:
524:
521:
520:
519:
513:
508:
503:
502:
497:
496:
491:
490:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
467:
465:
464:
460:
459:
455:
451:
447:
441:
438:
437:
434:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:
396:
390:
385:
383:
380:
376:
375:
371:
365:
362:
359:
355:
350:
346:
340:
332:
331:
321:
317:
312:
311:
299:
297:
296:
292:
289:
285:
284:
280:
277:
274:
273:
268:
264:
260:
259:
254:
250:
246:
245:
244:
238:
235:
232:
228:
227:
208:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2169:
2148:
2131:
2120:
2090:49.195.81.81
2086:
2045:49.195.81.81
2041:
2036:
1996:49.195.81.81
1994:
1972:— Preceding
1967:
1961:
1957:
1954:
1950:
1945:
1937:
1928:
1924:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1895:49.195.81.81
1890:
1866:49.195.81.81
1830:49.195.81.81
1786:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1720:provitamin A
1697:49.195.2.162
1677:49.195.2.162
1675:
1614:, which has
1578:49.195.2.162
1575:
1569:
1565:
1560:
1557:
1541:49.195.2.162
1537:
1532:
1495:49.195.2.162
1491:
1488:
1439:49.195.2.162
1435:
1430:
1426:
1423:
1419:
1414:
1411:
1388:49.195.2.162
1347:49.195.2.162
1323:Please read
1310:49.195.2.162
1305:
1301:
1298:
1293:
1220:49.195.2.162
1199:49.195.2.162
1192:
1168:
1163:
1160:
1152:
1097:
1066:
1037:project page
1026:
1021:
1020:
972:
932:
926:China portal
845:
799:
755:
674:
653:
617:
613:
609:
608:Bring these
591:
587:
583:
582:Bring these
566:Ham and eggs
539:
535:
531:
527:
516:
515:
493:
445:
401:
345:WikiProjects
328:
294:
293:
258:reassessment
256:
241:
240:
236:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2155:Staszek Lem
1723:carotenoids
1715:WP:WHYMEDRS
1025:is part of
689:transcluded
673:. List any
658:select here
626:Burger King
395:Food portal
253:renominated
148:free images
31:not a forum
2210:Categories
2132:Ritchie333
1978:Chango369w
1739:WebMD says
1264:Masacatior
300:Not listed
2145:Wolfberry
1963:User:zefr
1727:vitamin E
1725:and seed
1127:Archive 4
1120:Archive 3
1115:Archive 2
1110:Archive 1
643:WP:Trivia
570:Soy sauce
538:status:
333:is rated
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2060:WP:MEDRS
1986:contribs
1974:unsigned
1711:WP:MEDRS
1593:WP:MEDRS
1325:WP:MEDRS
1241:WP:MEDRS
1098:Archives
652:Add the
620:status:
594:status:
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2108:MrOllie
2064:MrOllie
2015:MrOllie
1597:MrOllie
1455:MrOllie
1362:MrOllie
1329:MrOllie
1069:on the
975:on the
802:on the
475:history
448:on the
335:C-class
278:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
2170:Lycium
1620:raisin
1171:Facial
775:Plants
766:botany
762:plants
718:Plants
578:Yogurt
341:scale.
281:Result
239:was a
126:Google
1885:this.
1844:here,
1245:Hipal
948:China
939:China
895:China
622:Apple
604:Sugar
574:Sushi
558:Drink
554:Curry
550:Bread
485:purge
480:watch
412:drink
322:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
2195:talk
2191:Zefr
2178:talk
2159:talk
2149:per
2112:talk
2094:talk
2068:talk
2049:talk
2019:talk
2013:. -
2000:talk
1982:talk
1943:.
1899:talk
1870:talk
1853:talk
1849:Zefr
1834:talk
1813:talk
1795:talk
1747:talk
1743:Zefr
1701:talk
1681:talk
1632:talk
1628:Zefr
1601:talk
1582:talk
1545:talk
1499:talk
1459:talk
1443:talk
1392:talk
1366:talk
1351:talk
1333:talk
1314:talk
1268:talk
1249:talk
1224:talk
1203:talk
1175:talk
1022:Goji
764:and
645:and
630:Fish
596:Beer
562:Food
546:Beef
495:here
470:edit
410:and
408:food
275:Date
237:Goji
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
25:Goji
2125:or
1061:Mid
967:Mid
794:Mid
440:Low
176:TWL
2212::
2197:)
2180:)
2161:)
2129:.
2114:)
2096:)
2070:)
2051:)
2021:)
2002:)
1988:)
1984:•
1901:)
1872:)
1855:)
1836:)
1815:)
1797:)
1749:)
1703:)
1683:)
1634:)
1603:)
1584:)
1547:)
1501:)
1461:)
1445:)
1394:)
1368:)
1353:)
1335:)
1316:)
1270:)
1251:)
1226:)
1205:)
1177:)
628:,
624:,
618:FA
614:GA
602:,
598:,
592:FA
588:GA
576:,
572:,
568:,
564:,
560:,
556:,
552:,
548:,
536:GA
522::
201:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
2193:(
2176:(
2157:(
2110:(
2092:(
2066:(
2047:(
2017:(
1998:(
1980:(
1897:(
1868:(
1851:(
1832:(
1811:(
1793:(
1745:(
1699:(
1679:(
1630:(
1599:(
1580:(
1543:(
1497:(
1457:(
1441:(
1390:(
1364:(
1349:(
1331:(
1312:(
1266:(
1247:(
1222:(
1201:(
1173:(
1073:.
979:.
806:.
660:.
638:.
532:B
452:.
347:.
203:4
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
