Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Gender-neutral language

Source 📝

1413:@88.104.254.41: Even without that stuff written by 602p one could use "any gender". If there are just male and female, "any gender" is still correct (though ambiguous, and thus maybe not the better choice). Maybe one could also use a neutral wording like "either or any gender", as some proposers of "gender-neutral language" might refer to both genders, while others might refer to any gender. In case of some Romance languages there are "gender-neutral forms" like "amig@s" (mixture of amigos (masculine) and amigas (female)), and some could say that it is gender-neutral (that is, it is gender-neutral regarding male-female differences). addresses gender-inclusive and gender-neutral language ("geschlechtersensiblen und inklusiven Sprache" and "geschlechtergerechte Sprache", lit. "gender-fair language") and just equality of male and female men resp. men and women ("Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern"), thus it ignores animals and plants (i.e. it is speciesist) and other genders (i.e. it is gender-binary). - 1335:
there is no evidence to prove that this word actually existed. Over time the spelling of 'wifman' morphed into 'woman' and the meaning of the word 'man' changed from the neutral 'person' to specifically 'male person', though it retains its old neutral meaning when used essentially as a short form of 'mankind'. Many other words besides 'woman' which we use today that end in '-man' supposedly have there origins from back when 'man' meant person and are thus not actually male-specific as some suggest but gender neutral. Unfortunately many people are ignorant about this history and assume that anything and everything containing '-man' is male specific. Such ignorance has lead some people to incorrectly believe that 'woman' derived from a combination of 'womb' and 'man', and even to the view that words like 'human' and 'mankind' are male-centric and thus sexist. Interestingly the word 'wife' also originates from 'wifman'.
2020:
sometimes are misplaced (like one could incorrectly use ] in a linguistic context, but actually mean ] or ]). The usual wording to differ between those meanings of genders (at least in other languages or non-"genderism" contexts) is to use "grammatical gender" (gender in grammar), and "biological gender" or "sex" (gender outside of grammar, in nature) . Thus using "biological gender" and "grammatical gender" is unambiguous, so that nothing gets mixed up, and is common and neutral usage (at least in other languages or non-"genderism" contexts). So, as just using the word "gender" is still ambiguous, please suggest an un-ambiguous and "NPOV" wording .
2926:
feminization forms are awkward in spoken and informal language. Also, feminization forms inherently rely on a gender binary system. As neutralization strategies do not reference gender, they are suggested for any context that does not rely on gender information in order to minimize the role of gender in mental representations. Specifically, neutralization strategies for natural gender language and a combination of neutralization and feminization strategies for gendered languages is called for.
2890:
to choose whether the referent is male or female, linking the generic male form to a female referent over a male referent requires more input information to be sure of correct overt gendering. This leads to asymmetry of the generic male form to be male-biased. Male-biased interpretation of the generic male form is seen even though the forms are intended to be gender unmarked. This is true even when being reminded of the generic use of the male form.
367: 349: 3547: 437: 269: 251: 746: 279: 3593: 1188: 1135: 220: 1615:@benlisquare: "never existed a movement by native Japanese speakers". Well, that's not needed. Western feminists could propose to eliminate such difference and could use the term "gender-neutrality" for it, too. Of course that would be cultural imperialism, but that's another topic, and of course one should clearly state that Western feminists proposed to elimanite such changes (if they did). 820: 736: 718: 1861:"Gender-neutrality and gender-emphasis": There are different approaches regarding "gender-neutrality". Some gender-neutrality approaches actually emphasize gender by using wordings like "he or she" or "actors and actresses". (Such wordings might be more common in languages with (grammatical) genders and nouns which only refer to one biological gender, like German 2880:
and interferes with gender bias outside of language. Countries where gendered languages are used have on average less gender equality whereas countries where natural gender languages are spoken have on average higher gender equality. These and other reports made clear the need for reducing gender bias in language in order to reduce gender inequality.
2081:. I don't see your lead changes as needed, but I won't revert again if you re-add those, as long as you don't re-add "biological gender." I don't know what you mean by "The misleading wording 'biological sex or gender', where gender is more likely to mean grammatical gender and which you critized for good reason, was yours and not my suggestion." 3565: 3518: 3494: 1986:
also has different meanings; and if we state that, in this case, people are likely to think that we mean "grammatical gender" instead of the "male or female" aspect, it can also be argued that using "sex" for your wording of "biological gender or sex" is ambiguous and that people most likely think we
1851:
Statement about "all sexes or genders" (also see the dicussion above): That's POV and not necessarily true. Sometimes gender-neutrality just refers to male and females (example was given), and while the male and female gender is sometimes seen as "all genders", there are others which say they are are
1734:
Instead of just reverting, why don't you help me format them properly or show me how they can be formatted? I found the online guide a bit confusing. Essentially correct: it is preferable to include roles in that sentence that are definitely gender-specific, instead of ones that are often taken to be
2879:
One's perceptual and cognitive experience of gender is tuned by the language of use. People are more aware and attentive to gender when using a language where gender is marked and less aware and attentive to gender when using a language where gender is not marked. Gender bias inside language affects
2872:
are grammatically gendered according to their intrinsic gender. In these languages, gender fair language generally applies only to pronouns and possessive pronouns. Every language has its own method for grammatical gender marking, and thus gender fair language applies differently to each language to
2696:
The title of the article might be best changed to "Gender fair language" from "Gender-neutral language" as the article discusses both neutralization and feminization strategies of reducing gender bias in language. The literature on gender bias in language uses gender fair language (GFL) to reference
2889:
Generic male forms can reference a male individual or a generic individual without intended gendering. Conversely, female forms only reference female individuals. This causes male forms to be more dominant in speech and female forms to be more marked, i.e. hold more salient information. Once having
2432:
The first version is short and clear without any unnecessary language. The second version unnecessarily trades "and" with "while" as though contrasting the terms, when the sentence is actually stating that both terms are gender-neutral. That is not good wording. That second version also states "are
2184:
If one can find a source, which proposes to merge grammatical genders (like merging masculine and feminine in French into a common gender similar to English) or create a new one (like creating a neuter gender for French) or re-arrange grammatical genders of words (like making all German terms which
1840:
That is ambiguous at best, but actually it's rather senseless and wrong. "gender" has different meanings, but in a linguistic contect ("language") it usually is short for "grammatical gender". So the sentence is rather like this: "Gender-neutral language aims to eliminate (or neutralize) reference
1334:
The word 'man' used to mean person or human, 'wif' meant female or woman, and 'wer'/'were' meant male or man. The word 'wifman' was a combination of the two words 'wif' and 'man' meaning 'female person'. Logically 'werman'/'wereman' could similarly have meant 'male person' however some contest that
1264:
In the initial paragraph "chairman" is given as the first example of a "gendered" noun, whereas many people contend that the "man" in that case simply means "person", as it often did until the late 20th century. For example, the definition on dictionary.com doesn't mention men at all. I know many
3466:
is in progress. Not clear what, if anything, from that article needs to be preserved here, so will pare it down there first, then probably drop it into a Talk section for editors here to mine for any useful bits that need merging. The best part of it might be some of the references; that could be
1511:
This is completely original research, and appears to shoehorn the reference to the Japanese language having gender-separated speech/vocabulary into this article. There has never existed a movement, either historically or today, to remove gender differences from spoken Japanese, by native Japanese
2019:
This is a linguistic context, as even implied by the article title "language". So there is a need to disambiguate "gender", as this is usually short for "grammatical gender" in linguistics. Just linking to another article is no solution, as it's still ambiguous here, and as links can change and
1883:
PS: Added a reference which says something like "some gender-neutrality approaches are gender-binary, while some aren't". Maybe one could find a source to state something like "some gender-neutrality approaches are gender-binary and a critizised for being non-gender-neutral" (well, that wording
2565:
Presumably, there should also be a "Rationale for Gender-Neutral Language" section (e.g. I believe it's argued that if we say "Fireman" instead of "Firefighter", women won't become firefighters who otherwise would have), which the problems/criticism section would be in response to. A criticism
1457:
I just mentioned the term here on the talk page, but I didn't plead to mention speciesism in the article - well, at least not, if there is no critic against gender-neutrality in languages which say that it is speciesist, or if there is no-one pleading for "species-neutrality in language" (like
2925:
Studies evidence that feminization strategies are helpful for increasing the mental representation of the unexpected gender and therefore help mitigate gender stereotypes. In this way, feminization forms showed strengthened female associations compared to masculine forms only (GM). However,
2261:. In this case, my not responding to you means that I have nothing more, or mot much more, to state to you on this matter. If you want outside opinions on these changes of yours, since other editors watching this talk page are not responding to you, then try one of the matters listed at 1857:
PS: Ok, the change was misleading and non-neutral. When one says that there are just two genders (male and female), then it's "all genders = the male and the female gender". So one could misunderstand "both (the male and female) or all sexes or genders" to mean something like "some
1318:
You mentioned that man simply means person. As we know this fact, we should think that why do we take this for granted. the problem is why man means human, while woman doesn't have such a meaning. Unless, I believe everyone knows what "man" means here. The basic gender is male
1846:
Statement about Japanese (also see the dicussion above): That's unsourced, and it's a source was requested since July 2014, so requested for more than a year. (I first worte "unsourced since" and "unsourced for", but actually it might be unsourced for a longer
2548:
Of course, some critism might be limited so single languages and does rather belong into sub-articles. And of course, one could also show more gender-neutral forms, but some forms might be limited to single languages and might rather be put into sub-articles.
1431:
A simple phrase to use in some contexts is "regardless of gender", which should be usable by all, from the gender-binary-ists to the gender-infinity-ists. And there is nothing to be gained by introducing the concept of "speciesism" in an article about
1464:
IMHO that wording is ok, but one problem might arise in the context: Some gender-neutrality approaches are gender-binary. So there might be "gender-infinity-ists" which critisize the gender-binary approach and say that it isn't gender-neutral at
2538:
When a word like "man" means "human being", then something like "man and woman" gives "human being and woman", so it discriminates males. (This example maybe isn't the best one, but conveys the principle how gender-neutral language can be seen
1192: 3605: 1512:
speakers. Unless a source can be added explicitly stating that "gender neutral language, in the context of Japanese, refers to eliminating these differences from the language – for men and women to speak the same way", it is purely
1578:
Japanese friend who's decently familiar with gender stuff said there was an article from Canada about use of "xe" that got (mis)translated and was circulating around 2chan, but knew of no movements to end gendered language use.
1618:
PS: Maybe there are other languages where men and women speak different. So maybe one could simple replace "Japense" by another language's name or a word like "some". Anyway, as it was unsourced and doubtful, I've moved it to
382:
aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
1279:
You are quite right. But any example you are likely to give will have the same problem, since "man" is gender-neutral, woman being female, wereman being male. The whole movement is based on a grammatical misunderstanding.
1701:
I appreciate your efforts and have reverted your edits because of formatting issues. Your main issue seems to be that "chairman" can be applied to both men and women and thus should not be included on the list, correct?
1302:
Then one could still give that example, but put it more neutral. That is, one should say that some think or claim that e.g. chairman only refers to males, while others don't think so (or didn't think so in earlier times).
153: 1887:
Meaning of English words (also see the dicussion above): At the moment there is just one meaning or rather one interpretation of some terms sourced with some dictionaries. But there were and are other interpretations.
2015:
If you disliked that wording, why didn't you just change that instead of reverting everything? Maybe one could (that's not necessarily that I do) interpret your reverting as vandalism, as a removing of "unwanted"
1935:
article and in the Sex and gender distinction article. Your edit of "biological gender" is essentially stating "gender is biological, and there is some other form that isn't." Even above in this section, you use
1147: 2031:"un-grammatical gender" sounds unfitting, like some grammatically incorrect gender and not like gender outside of grammar. Semi-PS: Well, "non-grammatical gender" might fit, that is "gender outside of grammar". 1663:
being described as gender-specific, when to many, including where I live, it is not. It would be preferable to include in the original sentence only terms that are unambiguously not gender-specific, such as
2973:
Prewitt-Freilino, Jennifer L.; Caswell, T. Andrew; Laakso, Emmi K. (2012). "The Gendering of Language: A Comparison of Gender Equality in Countries with Gendered, Natural Gender, and Genderless Languages".
2028:
Well, as "gender" in grammar is sometimes amibiuous too, there could even be something like "grammatical gender of nouns" and "grammatical gender of verbs", but till now I've not seen something like that.
1841:
to grammatical gender in terms that describe people.". But that's not what gender-neutrality is (e.g. the English term woman doesn't have a grammatical gender, but refers to a person of female sex).
1256:
of the person, which is all that matters. "Accompanist" would work in some cases--it tends to get used more in classical music contexts, especially when only one musician is doing the accompanying.
510: 613: 2848:
Gender marking occurs the most in gendered languages, like German, Spanish, and French, where all nouns are grammatically gendered. In these languages, gender fair language generally applies to
2130:"reference to gender in terms that describe people." -- That's in the article and quite ambiguous. One could misunderstand it to mean to e.g. merge French "un enfant" (grammatically masculine, 1881:(Of course there might be views, that such approaches actually aren't gender neutral, but gender-binary, but 1. then there would be different views and 2. I can't give a source for that.) 2025:
In other languages and non-"genderism" and non-linguistics contexts it is not uncommon to have it like "gender = biological gender = sex", and a "sex and gender distinction" is POV too.
2038:
part: The misleading wording "biological sex or gender", where gender is more likely to mean grammatical gender and which you critized for good reason, was yours and not my suggestion.
2697:
any strategy in language to reduce gender bias A review on feminization versus neutralization strategies is discussed in: Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome?.
2765:
Lindqvist, Anna; Renström, Emma; Gustafsson Sendén, Marie (2019). "Reducing a male bias in language? Establishing the efficiency of three different gender-fair language strategies".
3431:
Material above can be merged into the article as needed. Note that for your convenience, all citations above have already been ported into the article; they can be found in section
1630:, including the grammar and vocabulary used. In this context, gender-neutrality refers to eliminating these differences from the language – for men and women to speak the same way." 1468:
PS: - in a way that does critisize some gender-neutrality approaches, but it doesn't say so directly (it is like "We are gender-infinity-ists and use a *", and not like "You using
1362:
For a page about gender neutrality to repeatedly use this phrase is ironic, because it assumes that there are only two options. The (factually) correct form would be 'any gender'.
147: 2893:
In natural gender languages like English, the male-bias of referents only affects pronouns as those are the only forms that require grammatical gender marking. Role nouns (e.g.
1956:
most commonly refers to the state of being male or female and/or following the feminine and masculine gender roles. That is why the Gender article is about that definition, not
485: 1509:"A distinct issue arises in Japanese... In this context, gender-neutrality refers to eliminating these differences from the language – for men and women to speak the same way." 1241:
article but am wondering if "side-woman" is a real word or if "sideman" is actually one of those unfortunate sort of gender neutral words that we learn to live with. Einar aka
3672: 460: 408: 654: 690: 535: 2929:
Generic male neutralization forms have been criticized since the 1970s as having persisting male bias. However, one specific form, the Dutch masculine possessive pronoun
414: 2638: 2634: 2620: 1484:
the "gender-binary-ists" and the "gender-infinity-ists" view has to be mentioned. As a note: The statements above a from radical left-wingers, not from ordinary people.
3687: 792: 1814:
This essay came up in a conversation about the Knowledge (XXG) Manual of Style's stance on the generic he and gender-neutral language. It has has progressed to two
44: 2516:
Problems which arrise of gender-neutrality approaches, and of criticism of "gender-neutral language" include (esp. in case of languages with grammatical genders):
798: 3657: 325: 331: 79: 3204:
Gabriel, Ute; Behne, Dawn M.; Gygax, Pascal M. (2017-05-17). "Speech vs. reading comprehension: an explorative study of gender representations in Norwegian".
3677: 3667: 3613: 2905:) do not have a gender bias from grammatical information, but rather a gender bias due to stereotyping of which gender is assumed to hold that profession. 456: 2145:"reference to (non-grammatical) gender ..." -- This is short and unambiguous, and that is what I first wanted to use, but this doesn't include a link to " 3692: 3682: 1204: 1163: 768: 503: 85: 3662: 1546:
I can ask some Japanese friends if they've ever heard about it and possibly see if they can point me to sources. Prima facie, it sounds untrue.
384: 374: 354: 301: 2606: 3652: 3073: 190: 1960:. So for the "Gender-neutral language is a form of linguistic prescriptivism that aims to eliminate" sentence, there is no need disambiguate 528: 2257:, per what I've stated above. And just because I cease talking with you here at this talk page doesn't mean that I agree with you. It is not 1627: 1766: 1752: 1736: 1363: 30: 1191:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Fall 2015. Further details are available
759: 723: 517: 1377: 1266: 2704: 2550: 2216: 2199: 2044: 1896: 1688: 1673: 1634: 1533: 1488: 1414: 1342: 1304: 1287: 599: 168: 2542:
Forms like German "LehrerIn", "Lehrer/in", "Lehrer/-in" (look and) sound like "Lehrerin" (female teacher), so it discriminates males.
1815: 564: 292: 256: 99: 2616:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1529: 135: 1265:
people disagree but isn't it rather a bad example to have in the opening paragraph, particularly as the very first example of all?
104: 20: 3241:
GABRIEL, UTE; GYGAX, PASCAL (October 2008). "Can societal language amendments change gender representation? The case of Norway".
1995:" is clearer. We have the Wikilinks with that wording, and anyone confused by what we mean on that can click on those two terms. 74: 3087:
Chen, Jenn-Yeu; Su, Jui-Ju (2010-12-01). "Differential Sensitivity to the Gender of a Person by English and Chinese Speakers".
2936:
Novel neutral forms show results of no gender bias and linguists have suggested adopting a gender-neutral pronoun over generic
2827: 3137:
Gabriel, Ute; Gygax, Pascal M.; Kuhn, Elisabeth A. (2018-07-19). "Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome?".
2262: 2253:"; that is absolutely not needed, per what I stated above. All that is needed is "gender" or "biological sex or gender"; I've 606: 449: 231: 2523:(Some) gender-neutral texts are ugly (when using special characters like / or * or _ or I or @ to make it "gender-neutral"). 492: 65: 2529:
It is more difficult or even impossible to read (some) gender-neutral texts (How should special characters be pronounced?).
2433:
said to be," which seems to be lightly contesting that "policeman" is not gender-neutral. The "are said to be" addition is
2700: 640: 2258: 129: 2681: 2868:. Grammatical gender is also marked to a lesser extent in natural gender languages, like English and Swedish, in which 2434: 478: 3378:"Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: the influence of time on attitudes and behavior" 125: 1928: 1911:
Stating "biological gender" can be considered POV, which is the main reason I have reverted you twice now (as seen
1659:
to be gender-specific. I hope this works much better. It seeemed very strange when I first read the article to see
1395: 185: 3280:"Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language Strategies" 2788:
Gabriel, Ute; Gygax, Pascal; Kuhn, Elisabeth (2018). "Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome?".
672: 109: 2390: 2345: 581: 3633: 2637:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
199: 3436: 1838:"Gender-neutral language aims to eliminate (or neutralize) reference to gender in terms that describe people." 1770: 1756: 1740: 595: 175: 1367: 647: 379: 237: 219: 3171:
MILLER, MEGAN M.; JAMES, LORI E. (2009). "Is the generic pronoun he still comprehended as excluding women?".
2607:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140714235019/https://www2.stetson.edu/secure/history/hy10302/nongenderlang.html
1858:
pseudo-gender-neutrality approaches aren't gender-neutral, but exclude some genders", which is a POV-wording.
1381: 3487: 3432: 3323:"The processing of the Dutch masculine generic zijn 'his' across stereotype contexts: An eye-tracking study" 2672: 2598: 2590: 2220: 1692: 1677: 1291: 1270: 1091: 1078: 1064: 1049: 1035: 1021: 1006: 991: 976: 961: 946: 932: 918: 903: 889: 876: 863: 840: 24: 2212: 1687:
If you would like to improve the article further, you could format the references so they appear properly.
1338: 1283: 553: 3609: 2554: 2203: 2048: 1900: 1719: 1638: 1596: 1563: 1418: 1346: 1308: 3440: 2070: 620: 55: 3629: 3067: 2719: 2656:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2644: 2142:). (Actually there might be similar proposals, but that is not what gender-neutrality means in general.) 2117:
How about the new version? As before, it's meant to be a basis for discussion and not be "edit-warring".
1525: 1437: 767:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
300:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2597:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2445:
tag (two tags which significantly annoy me, especially since they are so commonly carelessly applied).
70: 2397:
is nowadays also labeled to be gender-specific; the corresponding gender-neutral terms are said to be
3540: 3463: 3334: 2823: 2815: 2610: 2571: 1940:
to refer to male and females. If you want to include biological sex in the article, then just state "
1823: 141: 542: 467: 3617: 2865: 2309:(I mean the lead changes you restored), I don't see how they are an improvement. Compare them here: 1246: 626: 161: 1655:
I have amended my edit to include references and to mention, as you suggested, that some consider
575: 3596:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
3576: 3558: 3530: 3505: 3476: 3467:
moved to a /* Further reading */ section here, and then converted to footnotes as needed. Adding
3448: 3187: 2740: 2249: 2190: 2186: 2173: 2164: 2157: 2153: 2146: 2124: 1957: 1324: 1212: 1171: 1138:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
751: 204: 2641:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
661: 2857: 2657: 3406: 3399: 3359: 3352: 3301: 3258: 3221: 3180: 3154: 3111: 3104: 3056: 3040: 2991: 2489: 2450: 2270: 2113:
Well, I'm no experienced WP editor, and ok, I didn't notice that it was just a partial revert.
2086: 2069:
No very experienced Knowledge (XXG) editor would interpret my reverting you as vandalism. The
2000: 1969: 1949: 1703: 1623: 1580: 1547: 1252:"Backing musician" would work just fine for these situations, and would keep the focus on the 51: 633: 3389: 3342: 3291: 3250: 3213: 3146: 3096: 3047: 3032: 2983: 2797: 2770: 2730: 2715: 1964:
with "biological gender" to make it clear that we are not talking about grammatical gender.
1931:. Whether or not gender is biological or socially constructed, or both, is addressed in the 1799: 1543: 1517: 1433: 1151: 591: 201: 2664: 2567: 2119:
I first wanted to propose another version, but then had some doubts, namely: As there is "
1819: 284: 2163:"reference to gender in terms that describe people. Note that this does not refer to the 1879:
Thus the change was necessary to further clarify what "gender-neutrality" actually means.
1513: 3338: 3621: 3051: 3020: 2623:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1988: 1941: 1843:
Thus the change removed the ambiguity and made the sentence more clearly resp. correct.
1403: 1242: 436: 3546: 2663:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2630: 3646: 3572: 3554: 3526: 3501: 3472: 3444: 3254: 2736: 2442: 1320: 1231: 1208: 1167: 586: 2532:
Gender-neutralists 'destroy' language, and break orthographic and grammatical rules.
1390:
128.232.249.94 is right in this case, and you (88.104.254.41) might want to look at
366: 348: 3637: 3580: 3534: 3509: 3480: 3468: 3452: 2744: 2723: 2708: 2686: 2575: 2558: 2493: 2485: 2454: 2446: 2438: 2274: 2266: 2207: 2090: 2082: 2052: 2004: 1996: 1973: 1965: 1904: 1827: 1803: 1774: 1760: 1744: 1729: 1696: 1681: 1642: 1606: 1573: 1537: 1491: 1441: 1422: 1407: 1385: 1371: 1350: 1328: 1312: 1295: 1274: 1216: 1196: 1175: 1155: 203: 3217: 1787: 1458:
pleading to use "he" and "she" for animals and to stop using the speciesist "it").
3347: 3322: 1765:
Just so you know, my IP address has updated: I am still the same user as before.
3592: 2514:
One could add, and most likely should add, a section about problems and critism.
1795: 1724: 1601: 1568: 1391: 1187: 1134: 764: 3278:
Lindqvist, Anna; Renström, Emma Aurora; Gustafsson Sendén, Marie (2018-10-16).
2247:
No, I don't approve of your wording of "here this is not meant in the sense of
2160:
of words --" -- This maybe makes the first sentence quite long, maybe too long.
745: 278: 268: 250: 3296: 3279: 3100: 2987: 2774: 2629:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1494:, PS: 22:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC) (This section also edited by 80.133.125.112) 741: 678: 274: 3402: 3394: 3377: 3355: 3304: 3261: 3224: 3183: 3157: 3150: 3107: 3043: 3036: 2994: 2801: 1751:
tags to give properly formatted references. I hope you are happy with this.
1399: 3409: 3362: 3114: 3059: 2520:(Older) gender-neutral texts will be incorrectly seen as gender-unneutral. 3021:"Can Gender-Fair Language Reduce Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination?" 2911:
Recently, some instances of new gender neutral pronouns, such as English
1480:) is gender-binary" and "there are also gender-infinitiv-ists forms". So 297: 3190: 1791: 1376:
What on earth are you on about? How can there be more than two genders?
3376:
Gustafsson Sendén, Marie; Bäck, Emma A.; Lindqvist, Anna (2015-07-01).
2869: 2853: 1790:. Any job title with the suffix '-man' can be taken as gender neutral, 1238: 2535:
Some gender-neutrality approaches are gender-binary, or even sexists:
2156:-- ..." or "reference to gender of living creatures -- and not to the 735: 717: 2120: 1992: 1945: 1932: 1889:
Thus the change removed some POV by mentioning other interpretations.
1749:
I have just gone through and updated the references with <url: -->
3019:
Sczesny, Sabine; Formanowicz, Magda; Moser, Franziska (2016-02-02).
2510:
More information: Problems and criticism of gender-neutral language
1893:
All in all, the change from 9th August removed ambiguities and POV.
2611:
https://www2.stetson.edu/secure/history/hy10302/nongenderlang.html
1626:: the Japanese language does not have grammatical gender, but the 2185:
describe people to neuters, such as "das Lehrer"), then "not ...
3321:
Redl, Theresa; Eerland, Anita; Sanders, Ted J. M. (2018-10-18).
2849: 2526:
It is more difficult to understand (some) gender-neutral texts.
2152:"reference to gender -- here this is not meant in the sense of 1982: 1476:
are gender-binary-ists"). - that says "using Binnen-I (as in
814: 213: 205: 15: 1987:
mean sexual activity. So that's another reason that stating "
2830:, which can be mined for useful material to be merged here. 2127:", that is a link to other article? Compare the following: 2601:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3587:
Wiki Education assignment: Industry Theory and Practice
2940:
or double-forms (feminization strategy) since the 80s.
2822:
The following is a copy of the four body sections from
2594: 2481: 2306: 2302: 2254: 2078: 2074: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1398:
As such, I will make suggested change to this article.
614:
Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs of gender studies
1234:
has played with other known musicians as a side-woman.
160: 2138:) into something like "unu enfant" (a new no-gender, 1182:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
1129:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
763:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 296:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2633:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1927:, your edit in that regard is at conflict with the 1792:
as that suffix can mean "human", rather than "male"
174: 1227:I recently discovered this sentence in an article: 797:This article has not yet received a rating on the 413:This article has not yet received a rating on the 330:This article has not yet received a rating on the 2838:A copy of body content from Gender fair language. 1869:(female teacher - and thus not male teacher) and 2566:section without a rationale section is bizarre. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2077:shows me reverting you on the lead, but not on 1952:" has no Knowledge (XXG) article. Furthermore, 1884:sounds POV-like, so would need an improvement). 2619:This message was posted before February 2018. 2348:; the corresponding gender-neutral terms are 8: 2735:None, in my opinion. But see next section. 2134:" and "une enfant" (grammatically feminine, 1854:Thus the change was neutral and removed POV. 1503:The Japanese language, and original research 1507:Currently a line within the article reads: 217: 3673:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles 3139:Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2943: 2922:Feminization and neutralization strategies 2833: 2790:Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2692:Gender-neutral versus gender fair language 2589:I have just modified one external link on 2210: 1336: 1223:This seems like a good place to post this. 837: 826: 712: 461:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles 444:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 422: 393:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Gender studies 343: 245: 3393: 3346: 3295: 3050: 1205:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1164:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 691:Gender studies articles needing attention 536:Gender studies articles needing infoboxes 3688:Unknown-importance Linguistics articles 2960: 2757: 1788:"Policeman" is as ambiguous as chairman 1203:Above undated message substituted from 1162:Above undated message substituted from 777:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Linguistics 714: 345: 247: 3065: 3316: 3314: 3273: 3271: 310:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Languages 7: 3658:Unknown-importance language articles 3236: 3234: 3132: 3130: 3128: 3126: 3124: 3089:Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 3014: 3012: 3010: 3008: 3006: 3004: 2968: 2966: 2964: 757:This article is within the scope of 290:This article is within the scope of 3678:WikiProject Gender studies articles 3668:Start-Class Gender studies articles 396:Template:WikiProject Gender studies 236:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3601: 3597: 3243:Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 3173:The American Journal of Psychology 3072:: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI ( 2561:& 18:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC) 1396:difference between sex and gender. 1143: 1139: 457:Unassessed Gender studies articles 14: 2933:shows results of no gender bias. 2593:. Please take a moment to review 1907:, PS 23:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC) 1818:. Further opinions are welcome. 1237:I linked it (side-woman) to the 600:Women's education in Saudi Arabia 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 3693:WikiProject Linguistics articles 3683:Start-Class Linguistics articles 3604:. Further details are available 3591: 3563: 3545: 3516: 3492: 3255:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00650.x 2189:" could be "not necessarily ... 1186: 1146:. Further details are available 1133: 818: 780:Template:WikiProject Linguistics 744: 734: 716: 435: 365: 347: 277: 267: 249: 218: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3206:Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2303:the other lead changes you made 1810:RfC: The MoS and the generic he 1628:speech of men and women differs 3663:WikiProject Languages articles 3514:Port sourced content to Talk. 2255:changed the lead to the latter 313:Template:WikiProject Languages 1: 3653:Start-Class language articles 3628:— Assignment last updated by 3218:10.1080/20445911.2017.1326923 2167:of words." or "... Note that 1833:Changes from 9th August 2015‎ 1804:15:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC) 1775:20:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 1761:20:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 1745:19:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 1730:19:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 1697:12:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 1682:12:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 1408:15:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 771:and see a list of open tasks. 304:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 3638:17:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC) 3561:) 03:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 3348:10.1371/journal.pone.0205903 2948:Click '' to view References. 2724:17:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 2709:17:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 1622:"A distinct issue arises in 1386:13:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 1329:19:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC) 1275:14:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 1217:22:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 1176:21:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 3435:, and can be referenced by 2687:23:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC) 2559:23:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC) 2494:13:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC) 2455:22:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC) 2275:22:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC) 2208:20:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC) 2091:18:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC) 2053:18:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC) 2005:00:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC) 1974:00:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC) 1905:17:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC) 1492:21:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC) 1442:20:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC) 1351:05:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 3709: 2845:Grammatical gender marking 2650:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2586:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2576:03:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC) 1929:sex and gender distinction 1643:21:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 1423:21:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 1313:21:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 799:project's importance scale 415:project's importance scale 375:WikiProject Gender studies 332:project's importance scale 3581:21:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 3535:02:06, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 3453:03:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 3297:10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9 3101:10.1007/s10936-010-9164-9 2988:10.1007/s11199-011-0083-5 2775:10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9 2123:", should there also be " 2079:the other stuff you added 1828:18:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC) 796: 729: 582:Brannon Masculinity Scale 421: 412: 360: 329: 262: 244: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3510:19:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 3481:19:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 3395:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00893 3151:10.1177/1368430218771742 3037:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00025 2802:10.1177/1368430218771742 2745:19:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 2714:What's the difference?? 2701:Thisisquitealongusername 2437:and could earn itself a 1816:RfCs at the village pump 1651:Response to EvergreenFir 1607:20:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 1574:19:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 1538:07:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 1470:whatever form (e.g. the 1372:23:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 1296:18:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 596:Michael Kaufman (author) 372:This article is part of 3486:Move Gfl references to 3382:Frontiers in Psychology 3025:Frontiers in Psychology 2591:Gender-neutral language 2582:External links modified 2336:For example, the words 2075:my latest revert of you 841:Gender-neutral language 760:WikiProject Linguistics 399:Gender studies articles 25:Gender-neutral language 2814:Port of material from 2385:For example, the word 2305:and the followup edit 226:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 3608:. Student editor(s): 2769:. 81 (1-2): 109-117. 2263:WP:Dispute resolution 2073:policy is clear. And 1195:. Student editor(s): 1150:. Student editor(s): 1050:In specific languages 890:Terminology and views 511:/Sexuality and gender 387:for more information. 293:WikiProject Languages 230:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 3541:Gender fair language 3464:Gender fair language 2864:"teacher; m."), and 2824:Gender fair language 2816:Gender fair language 2631:regular verification 1948:." As you can see, " 783:Linguistics articles 641:Gender studies stubs 105:No original research 3616:). Peer reviewers: 3339:2018PLoSO..1305903R 2908:Novel neutral forms 2866:possessive pronouns 2621:After February 2018 2259:WP:Silent consensus 2171:here does not mean 844: 627:History of feminism 3606:on the course page 2883:Feminization forms 2675:InternetArchiveBot 2626:InternetArchiveBot 2250:grammatical gender 2191:grammatical gender 2187:grammatical gender 2174:grammatical gender 2165:grammatical gender 2158:grammatical gender 2154:grammatical gender 2147:grammatical gender 2125:grammatical gender 1958:grammatical gender 1193:on the course page 1148:on the course page 838: 752:Linguistics portal 232:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 3610:Marzipan Calicoco 3598:13 September 2022 3458:Merge in progress 3428: 3427: 3423: 3422: 2870:animate referents 2651: 2435:WP:Weasel wording 2224: 2215:comment added by 1950:biological gender 1919:). Like I stated 1728: 1605: 1572: 1514:original research 1353: 1341:comment added by 1286:comment added by 1123: 1122: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1113: 919:Gender indication 839:Section size for 813: 812: 809: 808: 805: 804: 711: 710: 707: 706: 703: 702: 699: 698: 342: 341: 338: 337: 316:language articles 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3700: 3640: 3630:MammothSunflower 3614:article contribs 3603: 3602:19 December 2022 3599: 3595: 3571: 3567: 3566: 3549: 3524: 3520: 3519: 3500: 3496: 3495: 3488:#Further reading 3433:#Further reading 3414: 3413: 3397: 3373: 3367: 3366: 3350: 3333:(10): e0205903. 3318: 3309: 3308: 3299: 3290:(1–2): 109–117. 3275: 3266: 3265: 3238: 3229: 3228: 3201: 3195: 3194: 3168: 3162: 3161: 3134: 3119: 3118: 3084: 3078: 3077: 3071: 3063: 3054: 3016: 2999: 2998: 2982:(3–4): 268–281. 2970: 2944: 2919:, were created. 2873:match its need. 2834: 2806: 2805: 2785: 2779: 2778: 2762: 2734: 2685: 2676: 2649: 2648: 2627: 2403:flight attendant 2354:flight attendant 1735:gender-neutral. 1722: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1599: 1593: 1590: 1587: 1584: 1566: 1560: 1557: 1554: 1551: 1522: 1298: 1219: 1190: 1178: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1067: 1052: 1024: 1009: 994: 979: 964: 949: 921: 906: 845: 827: 822: 821: 815: 785: 784: 781: 778: 775: 754: 749: 748: 738: 731: 730: 720: 713: 592:Media and gender 504:Deletion sorting 439: 432: 431: 423: 401: 400: 397: 394: 391: 369: 362: 361: 351: 344: 318: 317: 314: 311: 308: 287: 282: 281: 271: 264: 263: 253: 246: 229: 223: 222: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3708: 3707: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3643: 3642: 3627: 3589: 3564: 3562: 3517: 3515: 3493: 3491: 3460: 3437:Short footnotes 3429: 3424: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3375: 3374: 3370: 3320: 3319: 3312: 3277: 3276: 3269: 3240: 3239: 3232: 3203: 3202: 3198: 3170: 3169: 3165: 3136: 3135: 3122: 3086: 3085: 3081: 3064: 3018: 3017: 3002: 2972: 2971: 2962: 2949: 2923: 2909: 2887: 2884: 2877: 2846: 2839: 2820: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2787: 2786: 2782: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2728: 2694: 2679: 2674: 2642: 2635:have permission 2625: 2599:this simple FaQ 2584: 2512: 2391:gender-specific 2346:gender-specific 2034:Regarding that 1835: 1812: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1705: 1653: 1591: 1588: 1585: 1582: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1536: 1518: 1505: 1360: 1358:"Either gender" 1281: 1262: 1225: 1202: 1184: 1161: 1140:11 January 2021 1131: 1119: 1092:Further reading 1063: 1048: 1020: 1005: 990: 975: 960: 945: 917: 902: 832: 819: 782: 779: 776: 773: 772: 750: 743: 695: 685:Needs attention 398: 395: 392: 389: 388: 315: 312: 309: 306: 305: 285:Language portal 283: 276: 227: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3706: 3704: 3696: 3695: 3690: 3685: 3680: 3675: 3670: 3665: 3660: 3655: 3645: 3644: 3618:Benevolent Bat 3588: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3537: 3512: 3459: 3456: 3426: 3425: 3421: 3420: 3416: 3415: 3368: 3310: 3267: 3249:(5): 451–457. 3230: 3212:(7): 795–808. 3196: 3179:(4): 483–496. 3163: 3145:(5): 844–858. 3120: 3095:(3): 195–203. 3079: 3000: 2959: 2958: 2954: 2951: 2950: 2947: 2942: 2921: 2907: 2885: 2882: 2875: 2844: 2841: 2840: 2837: 2832: 2826:from revision 2819: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2780: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2693: 2690: 2669: 2668: 2661: 2614: 2613: 2605:Added archive 2583: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2540: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2515: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2399:police officer 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2350:police officer 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2161: 2150: 2143: 2136:a female child 2114: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2029: 2026: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2016:information... 2008: 2007: 1989:biological sex 1977: 1976: 1942:biological sex 1894: 1891: 1890: 1888: 1885: 1882: 1880: 1878: 1859: 1856: 1853: 1848: 1844: 1842: 1839: 1834: 1831: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1767:86.158.180.245 1753:86.158.180.245 1737:86.158.180.245 1652: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1641:) 21:33 & 1631: 1620: 1616: 1610: 1609: 1576: 1524: 1504: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1485: 1466: 1459: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1426: 1425: 1364:128.232.249.94 1359: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1316: 1315: 1261: 1258: 1236: 1228: 1224: 1221: 1183: 1180: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1068: 1065:Related topics 1060: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1002: 1001: 998: 995: 987: 986: 983: 980: 972: 971: 968: 965: 957: 956: 953: 950: 942: 941: 938: 935: 929: 928: 925: 922: 914: 913: 910: 907: 899: 898: 895: 892: 886: 885: 882: 879: 873: 872: 869: 866: 860: 859: 857: 854: 852: 849: 843:(17 sections) 834: 833: 830: 825: 823: 811: 810: 807: 806: 803: 802: 795: 789: 788: 786: 769:the discussion 756: 755: 739: 727: 726: 721: 709: 708: 705: 704: 701: 700: 697: 696: 694: 693: 681: 668: 657: 643: 629: 616: 602: 571: 560: 549: 538: 524: 513: 499: 488: 486:/Collaboration 474: 463: 443: 441: 440: 428: 427: 419: 418: 411: 405: 404: 402: 390:Gender studies 370: 358: 357: 355:Gender studies 352: 340: 339: 336: 335: 328: 322: 321: 319: 302:the discussion 289: 288: 272: 260: 259: 254: 242: 241: 235: 224: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3705: 3694: 3691: 3689: 3686: 3684: 3681: 3679: 3676: 3674: 3671: 3669: 3666: 3664: 3661: 3659: 3656: 3654: 3651: 3650: 3648: 3641: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3625: 3623: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3594: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3560: 3556: 3553: 3552: 3548: 3542: 3538: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3523: 3513: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3489: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3465: 3462:A merge from 3457: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3411: 3408: 3404: 3401: 3396: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3372: 3369: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3354: 3349: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3317: 3315: 3311: 3306: 3303: 3298: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3274: 3272: 3268: 3263: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3237: 3235: 3231: 3226: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3200: 3197: 3192: 3189: 3185: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3167: 3164: 3159: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3133: 3131: 3129: 3127: 3125: 3121: 3116: 3113: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3083: 3080: 3075: 3069: 3061: 3058: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3015: 3013: 3011: 3009: 3007: 3005: 3001: 2996: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2969: 2967: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2952: 2946: 2945: 2941: 2939: 2934: 2932: 2927: 2920: 2918: 2914: 2906: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2891: 2881: 2874: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2860:(e.g. German 2859: 2855: 2851: 2843: 2842: 2836: 2835: 2831: 2829: 2825: 2817: 2813: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2784: 2781: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2761: 2758: 2754: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2732: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2691: 2689: 2688: 2683: 2678: 2677: 2666: 2662: 2659: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2646: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2622: 2617: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2587: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2534: 2531: 2528: 2525: 2522: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2509: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2443:Template:Whom 2440: 2436: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2192: 2188: 2183: 2182: 2176: 2175: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2148: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2115: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1985: 1984: 1980:Furthermore, 1979: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1886: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1855: 1852:more genders. 1849: 1845: 1837: 1836: 1832: 1830: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1786: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750:</url: --> 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1726: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1662: 1658: 1650: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1577: 1575: 1570: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1521: 1515: 1510: 1502: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1460: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1388: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1378:88.104.254.41 1374: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1357: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1267:80.254.146.20 1259: 1257: 1255: 1250: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1233: 1222: 1220: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1200: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1181: 1179: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1159: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1144:12 April 2021 1136: 1128: 1126: 1109: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1007:United States 1004: 1003: 999: 996: 993: 989: 988: 984: 981: 978: 974: 973: 969: 966: 963: 959: 958: 954: 951: 948: 944: 943: 939: 936: 934: 931: 930: 926: 923: 920: 916: 915: 911: 908: 905: 901: 900: 896: 893: 891: 888: 887: 883: 880: 878: 875: 874: 870: 867: 865: 862: 861: 855: 850: 847: 846: 842: 836: 835: 831:Section sizes 829: 828: 824: 817: 816: 800: 794: 791: 790: 787: 770: 766: 762: 761: 753: 747: 742: 740: 737: 733: 732: 728: 725: 722: 719: 715: 692: 688: 686: 682: 680: 677: 675: 674: 669: 666: 664: 663: 658: 656: 652: 650: 649: 644: 642: 638: 636: 635: 630: 628: 625: 623: 622: 617: 615: 611: 609: 608: 603: 601: 597: 593: 589: 588: 587:Holy Virility 583: 580: 578: 577: 572: 569: 567: 566: 561: 558: 556: 555: 550: 547: 545: 544: 539: 537: 533: 531: 530: 525: 522: 520: 519: 514: 512: 508: 506: 505: 500: 497: 495: 494: 489: 487: 483: 481: 480: 475: 472: 470: 469: 464: 462: 458: 454: 452: 451: 446: 445: 442: 438: 434: 433: 430: 429: 425: 424: 420: 416: 410: 407: 406: 403: 386: 381: 377: 376: 371: 368: 364: 363: 359: 356: 353: 350: 346: 333: 327: 324: 323: 320: 303: 299: 295: 294: 286: 280: 275: 273: 270: 266: 265: 261: 258: 255: 252: 248: 243: 239: 233: 225: 221: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3626: 3590: 3568: 3550: 3544: 3521: 3497: 3469:User:Elmidae 3461: 3443:if desired. 3430: 3385: 3381: 3371: 3330: 3326: 3287: 3283: 3246: 3242: 3209: 3205: 3199: 3176: 3172: 3166: 3142: 3138: 3092: 3088: 3082: 3068:cite journal 3028: 3024: 2979: 2975: 2955: 2937: 2935: 2930: 2928: 2924: 2916: 2915:and Swedish 2912: 2910: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2892: 2888: 2886:Generic male 2878: 2861: 2847: 2821: 2793: 2789: 2783: 2766: 2760: 2752: 2699: 2695: 2673: 2670: 2645:source check 2624: 2618: 2615: 2588: 2585: 2551:84.161.10.58 2547: 2513: 2439:Template:Who 2402: 2398: 2394: 2386: 2353: 2349: 2341: 2337: 2248: 2217:84.161.33.10 2211:— Preceding 2200:84.161.10.58 2172: 2168: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2116: 2071:WP:Vandalism 2045:84.161.10.58 2035: 1981: 1961: 1953: 1937: 1897:84.161.10.58 1892: 1877:( teacher).) 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1850: 1813: 1704: 1689:31.49.243.63 1674:31.49.243.63 1669: 1665: 1660: 1656: 1654: 1635:84.161.10.58 1581: 1548: 1519: 1508: 1506: 1489:84.161.10.58 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1461: 1454: 1415:84.161.10.58 1389: 1375: 1361: 1343:80.43.56.254 1337:— Preceding 1317: 1305:84.161.10.58 1288:92.19.142.11 1282:— Preceding 1278: 1263: 1253: 1251: 1230: 1226: 1201: 1185: 1160: 1132: 1124: 848:Section name 758: 684: 683: 671: 670: 660: 659: 655:/translation 646: 645: 632: 631: 619: 618: 605: 604: 585: 574: 573: 563: 562: 552: 551: 541: 540: 527: 526: 516: 515: 502: 501: 491: 490: 477: 476: 466: 465: 448: 447: 385:project page 373: 291: 238:WikiProjects 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2899:hairdresser 2731:Georgia guy 2716:Georgia guy 2301:Looking at 2036:Furthermore 1865:or Spanish 1544:Benlisquare 1520:benlisquare 1434:Pete unseth 1392:Genderqueer 1260:"Chairman"? 1152:Clairenelms 1022:Philippines 933:Controversy 774:Linguistics 765:linguistics 724:Linguistics 667:edit to see 570:edit to see 559:edit to see 548:edit to see 523:edit to see 498:edit to see 479:Collaborate 473:edit to see 426:To-do list: 380:WikiProject 228:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 3647:Categories 3441:named refs 2956:References 2876:Motivation 2862:der Lehrer 2858:role nouns 2753:References 2682:Report bug 2568:Dingsuntil 2387:stewardess 2342:stewardess 1820:Darkfrog24 1670:stewardess 1455:Specicism: 1079:References 679:Riot grrrl 554:Notability 3622:Perdidojj 3539:Redirect 3403:1664-1078 3356:1932-6203 3305:0360-0025 3284:Sex Roles 3262:0036-5564 3225:2044-5911 3184:0002-9556 3158:1368-4302 3108:0090-6905 3044:1664-1078 2995:0360-0025 2976:Sex Roles 2828:961722996 2767:Sex Roles 2665:this tool 2658:this tool 2395:policeman 2338:policeman 1867:profesora 1723:Please {{ 1666:policeman 1600:Please {{ 1567:Please {{ 1243:Carptrash 947:Argentina 648:Translate 307:Languages 298:languages 257:Languages 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3573:Mathglot 3555:Mathglot 3527:Mathglot 3502:Mathglot 3473:Mathglot 3445:Mathglot 3410:26191016 3363:30335820 3327:PLOS ONE 3191:27784423 3115:21120608 3060:26869947 2854:pronouns 2737:Mathglot 2671:Cheers.— 2539:sexist.) 2482:Reverted 2393:, while 2213:unsigned 2132:a child 1875:profesor 1863:Lehrerin 1661:chairman 1657:chairman 1624:Japanese 1478:LehrerIn 1472:Binnen-I 1462:Genders: 1394:and the 1339:unsigned 1321:Hanieh.g 1284:unsigned 1209:PrimeBOT 1168:PrimeBOT 1036:See also 493:Copyedit 378:. This 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3551:Pending 3335:Bibcode 3052:4735429 2818:article 2595:my edit 2486:Flyer22 2447:Flyer22 2267:Flyer22 2140:a child 2083:Flyer22 1997:Flyer22 1966:Flyer22 1482:somehow 1432:gender. 1239:sideman 1197:Jjac118 1156:Jeyonce 1110:32,136 940:10,031 904:General 877:History 856:Section 576:Orphans 529:Infobox 468:Cleanup 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3031:: 25. 2903:banker 2901:, and 2895:server 2169:gender 2121:gender 1993:gender 1962:gender 1954:gender 1946:gender 1938:gender 1933:Gender 1871:Lehrer 1847:time.) 1796:JudahH 1720:(talk) 1597:(talk) 1564:(talk) 1232:Goffin 1107:32,136 1099:3,350 1000:2,366 985:1,997 977:France 970:2,225 962:Canada 955:1,746 927:3,051 912:3,592 897:6,670 884:4,953 871:6,297 858:total 673:Verify 662:Update 518:Expand 450:Assess 234:scale. 126:Google 3188:JSTOR 2931:zijn, 2850:nouns 2796:(5). 1619:here: 1319:here. 1104:Total 1096:3,350 997:2,366 992:Italy 982:1,997 967:2,225 952:1,746 924:3,051 909:3,592 881:4,953 868:6,297 864:(Top) 853:count 634:Stubs 621:Split 607:Photo 543:Merge 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3634:talk 3600:and 3577:talk 3569:Done 3559:talk 3531:talk 3522:Done 3506:talk 3498:Done 3477:talk 3449:talk 3407:PMID 3400:ISSN 3360:PMID 3353:ISSN 3302:ISSN 3259:ISSN 3222:ISSN 3181:ISSN 3155:ISSN 3112:PMID 3105:ISSN 3074:link 3057:PMID 3041:ISSN 3029:7:25 2992:ISSN 2741:talk 2720:talk 2705:talk 2572:talk 2555:talk 2490:talk 2451:talk 2401:and 2352:and 2344:are 2340:and 2307:here 2271:talk 2221:talk 2204:talk 2087:talk 2049:talk 2001:talk 1970:talk 1925:here 1923:and 1921:here 1917:here 1915:and 1913:here 1901:talk 1824:talk 1800:talk 1771:talk 1757:talk 1741:talk 1693:talk 1678:talk 1668:and 1639:talk 1516:. -- 1465:all. 1438:talk 1419:talk 1404:talk 1400:602p 1382:talk 1368:talk 1347:talk 1325:talk 1309:talk 1292:talk 1271:talk 1254:role 1247:talk 1213:talk 1172:talk 1142:and 1073:580 1058:214 1043:807 1030:876 1015:764 851:Byte 689:see 653:see 639:see 612:see 565:NPOV 534:see 509:see 484:see 459:and 455:see 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3439:or 3390:doi 3343:doi 3292:doi 3251:doi 3214:doi 3177:122 3147:doi 3097:doi 3048:PMC 3033:doi 2984:doi 2917:hen 2798:doi 2771:doi 2639:RfC 2609:to 2441:or 2389:is 1991:or 1983:sex 1944:or 1873:or 1715:Fir 1712:een 1709:rgr 1706:Eve 1592:Fir 1589:een 1586:rgr 1583:Eve 1559:Fir 1556:een 1553:rgr 1550:Eve 1207:by 1166:by 1086:28 1070:580 1055:214 1027:876 1012:764 793:??? 409:??? 326:??? 176:TWL 3649:: 3636:) 3624:. 3620:, 3579:) 3543:. 3533:) 3525:. 3508:) 3490:: 3479:) 3471:. 3451:) 3405:. 3398:. 3388:. 3384:. 3380:. 3358:. 3351:. 3341:. 3331:13 3329:. 3325:. 3313:^ 3300:. 3288:81 3286:. 3282:. 3270:^ 3257:. 3247:49 3245:. 3233:^ 3220:. 3210:29 3208:. 3186:. 3175:. 3153:. 3143:21 3141:. 3123:^ 3110:. 3103:. 3093:40 3091:. 3070:}} 3066:{{ 3055:. 3046:. 3039:. 3027:. 3023:. 3003:^ 2990:. 2980:66 2978:. 2963:^ 2938:he 2913:ze 2897:, 2856:, 2852:, 2794:21 2792:. 2743:) 2722:) 2707:) 2652:. 2647:}} 2643:{{ 2574:) 2557:) 2492:) 2484:. 2453:) 2273:) 2265:. 2223:) 2206:) 2193:". 2177:." 2149:". 2089:) 2051:) 2003:) 1972:) 1903:) 1826:) 1802:) 1794:. 1773:) 1759:) 1743:) 1727:}} 1725:re 1695:) 1680:) 1672:. 1604:}} 1602:re 1571:}} 1569:re 1440:) 1421:) 1406:) 1384:) 1370:) 1349:) 1327:) 1311:) 1294:) 1273:) 1249:) 1215:) 1199:. 1174:) 1158:. 1154:, 1083:28 1040:13 937:57 894:27 598:· 594:· 590:· 584:· 156:) 54:; 3632:( 3612:( 3575:( 3557:( 3529:( 3504:( 3475:( 3447:( 3412:. 3392:: 3386:6 3365:. 3345:: 3337:: 3307:. 3294:: 3264:. 3253:: 3227:. 3216:: 3193:. 3160:. 3149:: 3117:. 3099:: 3076:) 3062:. 3035:: 2997:. 2986:: 2804:. 2800:: 2777:. 2773:: 2739:( 2733:: 2729:@ 2718:( 2703:( 2684:) 2680:( 2667:. 2660:. 2570:( 2553:( 2549:- 2488:( 2449:( 2405:. 2356:. 2269:( 2219:( 2202:( 2198:- 2085:( 2047:( 2043:- 1999:( 1968:( 1899:( 1895:- 1822:( 1798:( 1769:( 1755:( 1739:( 1691:( 1676:( 1637:( 1633:- 1534:E 1532:• 1530:C 1528:• 1526:T 1487:- 1474:) 1436:( 1417:( 1402:( 1380:( 1366:( 1345:( 1323:( 1307:( 1303:- 1290:( 1269:( 1245:( 1229:" 1211:( 1170:( 801:. 687:: 676:: 665:: 651:: 637:: 624:: 610:: 579:: 568:: 557:: 546:: 532:: 521:: 507:: 496:: 482:: 471:: 453:: 417:. 334:. 240:: 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Gender-neutral language
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Languages

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.