1413:@88.104.254.41: Even without that stuff written by 602p one could use "any gender". If there are just male and female, "any gender" is still correct (though ambiguous, and thus maybe not the better choice). Maybe one could also use a neutral wording like "either or any gender", as some proposers of "gender-neutral language" might refer to both genders, while others might refer to any gender. In case of some Romance languages there are "gender-neutral forms" like "amig@s" (mixture of amigos (masculine) and amigas (female)), and some could say that it is gender-neutral (that is, it is gender-neutral regarding male-female differences). addresses gender-inclusive and gender-neutral language ("geschlechtersensiblen und inklusiven Sprache" and "geschlechtergerechte Sprache", lit. "gender-fair language") and just equality of male and female men resp. men and women ("Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern"), thus it ignores animals and plants (i.e. it is speciesist) and other genders (i.e. it is gender-binary). -
1335:
there is no evidence to prove that this word actually existed. Over time the spelling of 'wifman' morphed into 'woman' and the meaning of the word 'man' changed from the neutral 'person' to specifically 'male person', though it retains its old neutral meaning when used essentially as a short form of 'mankind'. Many other words besides 'woman' which we use today that end in '-man' supposedly have there origins from back when 'man' meant person and are thus not actually male-specific as some suggest but gender neutral. Unfortunately many people are ignorant about this history and assume that anything and everything containing '-man' is male specific. Such ignorance has lead some people to incorrectly believe that 'woman' derived from a combination of 'womb' and 'man', and even to the view that words like 'human' and 'mankind' are male-centric and thus sexist. Interestingly the word 'wife' also originates from 'wifman'.
2020:
sometimes are misplaced (like one could incorrectly use ] in a linguistic context, but actually mean ] or ]). The usual wording to differ between those meanings of genders (at least in other languages or non-"genderism" contexts) is to use "grammatical gender" (gender in grammar), and "biological gender" or "sex" (gender outside of grammar, in nature) . Thus using "biological gender" and "grammatical gender" is unambiguous, so that nothing gets mixed up, and is common and neutral usage (at least in other languages or non-"genderism" contexts). So, as just using the word "gender" is still ambiguous, please suggest an un-ambiguous and "NPOV" wording .
2926:
feminization forms are awkward in spoken and informal language. Also, feminization forms inherently rely on a gender binary system. As neutralization strategies do not reference gender, they are suggested for any context that does not rely on gender information in order to minimize the role of gender in mental representations. Specifically, neutralization strategies for natural gender language and a combination of neutralization and feminization strategies for gendered languages is called for.
2890:
to choose whether the referent is male or female, linking the generic male form to a female referent over a male referent requires more input information to be sure of correct overt gendering. This leads to asymmetry of the generic male form to be male-biased. Male-biased interpretation of the generic male form is seen even though the forms are intended to be gender unmarked. This is true even when being reminded of the generic use of the male form.
367:
349:
3547:
437:
269:
251:
746:
279:
3593:
1188:
1135:
220:
1615:@benlisquare: "never existed a movement by native Japanese speakers". Well, that's not needed. Western feminists could propose to eliminate such difference and could use the term "gender-neutrality" for it, too. Of course that would be cultural imperialism, but that's another topic, and of course one should clearly state that Western feminists proposed to elimanite such changes (if they did).
820:
736:
718:
1861:"Gender-neutrality and gender-emphasis": There are different approaches regarding "gender-neutrality". Some gender-neutrality approaches actually emphasize gender by using wordings like "he or she" or "actors and actresses". (Such wordings might be more common in languages with (grammatical) genders and nouns which only refer to one biological gender, like German
2880:
and interferes with gender bias outside of language. Countries where gendered languages are used have on average less gender equality whereas countries where natural gender languages are spoken have on average higher gender equality. These and other reports made clear the need for reducing gender bias in language in order to reduce gender inequality.
2081:. I don't see your lead changes as needed, but I won't revert again if you re-add those, as long as you don't re-add "biological gender." I don't know what you mean by "The misleading wording 'biological sex or gender', where gender is more likely to mean grammatical gender and which you critized for good reason, was yours and not my suggestion."
3565:
3518:
3494:
1986:
also has different meanings; and if we state that, in this case, people are likely to think that we mean "grammatical gender" instead of the "male or female" aspect, it can also be argued that using "sex" for your wording of "biological gender or sex" is ambiguous and that people most likely think we
1851:
Statement about "all sexes or genders" (also see the dicussion above): That's POV and not necessarily true. Sometimes gender-neutrality just refers to male and females (example was given), and while the male and female gender is sometimes seen as "all genders", there are others which say they are are
1734:
Instead of just reverting, why don't you help me format them properly or show me how they can be formatted? I found the online guide a bit confusing. Essentially correct: it is preferable to include roles in that sentence that are definitely gender-specific, instead of ones that are often taken to be
2879:
One's perceptual and cognitive experience of gender is tuned by the language of use. People are more aware and attentive to gender when using a language where gender is marked and less aware and attentive to gender when using a language where gender is not marked. Gender bias inside language affects
2872:
are grammatically gendered according to their intrinsic gender. In these languages, gender fair language generally applies only to pronouns and possessive pronouns. Every language has its own method for grammatical gender marking, and thus gender fair language applies differently to each language to
2696:
The title of the article might be best changed to "Gender fair language" from "Gender-neutral language" as the article discusses both neutralization and feminization strategies of reducing gender bias in language. The literature on gender bias in language uses gender fair language (GFL) to reference
2889:
Generic male forms can reference a male individual or a generic individual without intended gendering. Conversely, female forms only reference female individuals. This causes male forms to be more dominant in speech and female forms to be more marked, i.e. hold more salient information. Once having
2432:
The first version is short and clear without any unnecessary language. The second version unnecessarily trades "and" with "while" as though contrasting the terms, when the sentence is actually stating that both terms are gender-neutral. That is not good wording. That second version also states "are
2184:
If one can find a source, which proposes to merge grammatical genders (like merging masculine and feminine in French into a common gender similar to
English) or create a new one (like creating a neuter gender for French) or re-arrange grammatical genders of words (like making all German terms which
1840:
That is ambiguous at best, but actually it's rather senseless and wrong. "gender" has different meanings, but in a linguistic contect ("language") it usually is short for "grammatical gender". So the sentence is rather like this: "Gender-neutral language aims to eliminate (or neutralize) reference
1334:
The word 'man' used to mean person or human, 'wif' meant female or woman, and 'wer'/'were' meant male or man. The word 'wifman' was a combination of the two words 'wif' and 'man' meaning 'female person'. Logically 'werman'/'wereman' could similarly have meant 'male person' however some contest that
1264:
In the initial paragraph "chairman" is given as the first example of a "gendered" noun, whereas many people contend that the "man" in that case simply means "person", as it often did until the late 20th century. For example, the definition on dictionary.com doesn't mention men at all. I know many
3466:
is in progress. Not clear what, if anything, from that article needs to be preserved here, so will pare it down there first, then probably drop it into a Talk section for editors here to mine for any useful bits that need merging. The best part of it might be some of the references; that could be
1511:
This is completely original research, and appears to shoehorn the reference to the
Japanese language having gender-separated speech/vocabulary into this article. There has never existed a movement, either historically or today, to remove gender differences from spoken Japanese, by native Japanese
2019:
This is a linguistic context, as even implied by the article title "language". So there is a need to disambiguate "gender", as this is usually short for "grammatical gender" in linguistics. Just linking to another article is no solution, as it's still ambiguous here, and as links can change and
1883:
PS: Added a reference which says something like "some gender-neutrality approaches are gender-binary, while some aren't". Maybe one could find a source to state something like "some gender-neutrality approaches are gender-binary and a critizised for being non-gender-neutral" (well, that wording
2565:
Presumably, there should also be a "Rationale for Gender-Neutral
Language" section (e.g. I believe it's argued that if we say "Fireman" instead of "Firefighter", women won't become firefighters who otherwise would have), which the problems/criticism section would be in response to. A criticism
1457:
I just mentioned the term here on the talk page, but I didn't plead to mention speciesism in the article - well, at least not, if there is no critic against gender-neutrality in languages which say that it is speciesist, or if there is no-one pleading for "species-neutrality in language" (like
2925:
Studies evidence that feminization strategies are helpful for increasing the mental representation of the unexpected gender and therefore help mitigate gender stereotypes. In this way, feminization forms showed strengthened female associations compared to masculine forms only (GM). However,
2261:. In this case, my not responding to you means that I have nothing more, or mot much more, to state to you on this matter. If you want outside opinions on these changes of yours, since other editors watching this talk page are not responding to you, then try one of the matters listed at
1857:
PS: Ok, the change was misleading and non-neutral. When one says that there are just two genders (male and female), then it's "all genders = the male and the female gender". So one could misunderstand "both (the male and female) or all sexes or genders" to mean something like "some
1318:
You mentioned that man simply means person. As we know this fact, we should think that why do we take this for granted. the problem is why man means human, while woman doesn't have such a meaning. Unless, I believe everyone knows what "man" means here. The basic gender is male
1846:
Statement about
Japanese (also see the dicussion above): That's unsourced, and it's a source was requested since July 2014, so requested for more than a year. (I first worte "unsourced since" and "unsourced for", but actually it might be unsourced for a longer
2548:
Of course, some critism might be limited so single languages and does rather belong into sub-articles. And of course, one could also show more gender-neutral forms, but some forms might be limited to single languages and might rather be put into sub-articles.
1431:
A simple phrase to use in some contexts is "regardless of gender", which should be usable by all, from the gender-binary-ists to the gender-infinity-ists. And there is nothing to be gained by introducing the concept of "speciesism" in an article about
1464:
IMHO that wording is ok, but one problem might arise in the context: Some gender-neutrality approaches are gender-binary. So there might be "gender-infinity-ists" which critisize the gender-binary approach and say that it isn't gender-neutral at
2538:
When a word like "man" means "human being", then something like "man and woman" gives "human being and woman", so it discriminates males. (This example maybe isn't the best one, but conveys the principle how gender-neutral language can be seen
1192:
3605:
1512:
speakers. Unless a source can be added explicitly stating that "gender neutral language, in the context of
Japanese, refers to eliminating these differences from the language – for men and women to speak the same way", it is purely
1578:
Japanese friend who's decently familiar with gender stuff said there was an article from Canada about use of "xe" that got (mis)translated and was circulating around 2chan, but knew of no movements to end gendered language use.
1618:
PS: Maybe there are other languages where men and women speak different. So maybe one could simple replace "Japense" by another language's name or a word like "some". Anyway, as it was unsourced and doubtful, I've moved it to
382:
aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
1279:
You are quite right. But any example you are likely to give will have the same problem, since "man" is gender-neutral, woman being female, wereman being male. The whole movement is based on a grammatical misunderstanding.
1701:
I appreciate your efforts and have reverted your edits because of formatting issues. Your main issue seems to be that "chairman" can be applied to both men and women and thus should not be included on the list, correct?
1302:
Then one could still give that example, but put it more neutral. That is, one should say that some think or claim that e.g. chairman only refers to males, while others don't think so (or didn't think so in earlier times).
153:
1887:
Meaning of
English words (also see the dicussion above): At the moment there is just one meaning or rather one interpretation of some terms sourced with some dictionaries. But there were and are other interpretations.
2015:
If you disliked that wording, why didn't you just change that instead of reverting everything? Maybe one could (that's not necessarily that I do) interpret your reverting as vandalism, as a removing of "unwanted"
1935:
article and in the Sex and gender distinction article. Your edit of "biological gender" is essentially stating "gender is biological, and there is some other form that isn't." Even above in this section, you use
1147:
2031:"un-grammatical gender" sounds unfitting, like some grammatically incorrect gender and not like gender outside of grammar. Semi-PS: Well, "non-grammatical gender" might fit, that is "gender outside of grammar".
1663:
being described as gender-specific, when to many, including where I live, it is not. It would be preferable to include in the original sentence only terms that are unambiguously not gender-specific, such as
2973:
Prewitt-Freilino, Jennifer L.; Caswell, T. Andrew; Laakso, Emmi K. (2012). "The
Gendering of Language: A Comparison of Gender Equality in Countries with Gendered, Natural Gender, and Genderless Languages".
2028:
Well, as "gender" in grammar is sometimes amibiuous too, there could even be something like "grammatical gender of nouns" and "grammatical gender of verbs", but till now I've not seen something like that.
1841:
to grammatical gender in terms that describe people.". But that's not what gender-neutrality is (e.g. the
English term woman doesn't have a grammatical gender, but refers to a person of female sex).
1256:
of the person, which is all that matters. "Accompanist" would work in some cases--it tends to get used more in classical music contexts, especially when only one musician is doing the accompanying.
510:
613:
2848:
Gender marking occurs the most in gendered languages, like German, Spanish, and French, where all nouns are grammatically gendered. In these languages, gender fair language generally applies to
2130:"reference to gender in terms that describe people." -- That's in the article and quite ambiguous. One could misunderstand it to mean to e.g. merge French "un enfant" (grammatically masculine,
1881:(Of course there might be views, that such approaches actually aren't gender neutral, but gender-binary, but 1. then there would be different views and 2. I can't give a source for that.)
2025:
In other languages and non-"genderism" and non-linguistics contexts it is not uncommon to have it like "gender = biological gender = sex", and a "sex and gender distinction" is POV too.
2038:
part: The misleading wording "biological sex or gender", where gender is more likely to mean grammatical gender and which you critized for good reason, was yours and not my suggestion.
2697:
any strategy in language to reduce gender bias A review on feminization versus neutralization strategies is discussed in: Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome?.
2765:
Lindqvist, Anna; Renström, Emma; Gustafsson Sendén, Marie (2019). "Reducing a male bias in language? Establishing the efficiency of three different gender-fair language strategies".
3431:
Material above can be merged into the article as needed. Note that for your convenience, all citations above have already been ported into the article; they can be found in section
1630:, including the grammar and vocabulary used. In this context, gender-neutrality refers to eliminating these differences from the language – for men and women to speak the same way."
1468:
PS: - in a way that does critisize some gender-neutrality approaches, but it doesn't say so directly (it is like "We are gender-infinity-ists and use a *", and not like "You using
1362:
For a page about gender neutrality to repeatedly use this phrase is ironic, because it assumes that there are only two options. The (factually) correct form would be 'any gender'.
147:
2893:
In natural gender languages like
English, the male-bias of referents only affects pronouns as those are the only forms that require grammatical gender marking. Role nouns (e.g.
1956:
most commonly refers to the state of being male or female and/or following the feminine and masculine gender roles. That is why the Gender article is about that definition, not
485:
1509:"A distinct issue arises in Japanese... In this context, gender-neutrality refers to eliminating these differences from the language – for men and women to speak the same way."
1241:
article but am wondering if "side-woman" is a real word or if "sideman" is actually one of those unfortunate sort of gender neutral words that we learn to live with. Einar aka
3672:
460:
408:
654:
690:
535:
2929:
Generic male neutralization forms have been criticized since the 1970s as having persisting male bias. However, one specific form, the Dutch masculine possessive pronoun
414:
2638:
2634:
2620:
1484:
the "gender-binary-ists" and the "gender-infinity-ists" view has to be mentioned. As a note: The statements above a from radical left-wingers, not from ordinary people.
3687:
792:
1814:
This essay came up in a conversation about the Knowledge (XXG) Manual of Style's stance on the generic he and gender-neutral language. It has has progressed to two
44:
2516:
Problems which arrise of gender-neutrality approaches, and of criticism of "gender-neutral language" include (esp. in case of languages with grammatical genders):
798:
3657:
325:
331:
79:
3204:
Gabriel, Ute; Behne, Dawn M.; Gygax, Pascal M. (2017-05-17). "Speech vs. reading comprehension: an explorative study of gender representations in Norwegian".
3677:
3667:
3613:
2905:) do not have a gender bias from grammatical information, but rather a gender bias due to stereotyping of which gender is assumed to hold that profession.
456:
2145:"reference to (non-grammatical) gender ..." -- This is short and unambiguous, and that is what I first wanted to use, but this doesn't include a link to "
3692:
3682:
1204:
1163:
768:
503:
85:
3662:
1546:
I can ask some Japanese friends if they've ever heard about it and possibly see if they can point me to sources. Prima facie, it sounds untrue.
384:
374:
354:
301:
2606:
3652:
3073:
190:
1960:. So for the "Gender-neutral language is a form of linguistic prescriptivism that aims to eliminate" sentence, there is no need disambiguate
528:
2257:, per what I've stated above. And just because I cease talking with you here at this talk page doesn't mean that I agree with you. It is not
1627:
1766:
1752:
1736:
1363:
30:
1191:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Fall 2015. Further details are available
759:
723:
517:
1377:
1266:
2704:
2550:
2216:
2199:
2044:
1896:
1688:
1673:
1634:
1533:
1488:
1414:
1342:
1304:
1287:
599:
168:
2542:
Forms like German "LehrerIn", "Lehrer/in", "Lehrer/-in" (look and) sound like "Lehrerin" (female teacher), so it discriminates males.
1815:
564:
292:
256:
99:
2616:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1529:
135:
1265:
people disagree but isn't it rather a bad example to have in the opening paragraph, particularly as the very first example of all?
104:
20:
3241:
GABRIEL, UTE; GYGAX, PASCAL (October 2008). "Can societal language amendments change gender representation? The case of Norway".
1995:" is clearer. We have the Wikilinks with that wording, and anyone confused by what we mean on that can click on those two terms.
74:
3087:
Chen, Jenn-Yeu; Su, Jui-Ju (2010-12-01). "Differential Sensitivity to the Gender of a Person by English and Chinese Speakers".
2936:
Novel neutral forms show results of no gender bias and linguists have suggested adopting a gender-neutral pronoun over generic
2827:
3137:
Gabriel, Ute; Gygax, Pascal M.; Kuhn, Elisabeth A. (2018-07-19). "Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome?".
2262:
2253:"; that is absolutely not needed, per what I stated above. All that is needed is "gender" or "biological sex or gender"; I've
606:
449:
231:
2523:(Some) gender-neutral texts are ugly (when using special characters like / or * or _ or I or @ to make it "gender-neutral").
492:
65:
2529:
It is more difficult or even impossible to read (some) gender-neutral texts (How should special characters be pronounced?).
2433:
said to be," which seems to be lightly contesting that "policeman" is not gender-neutral. The "are said to be" addition is
2700:
640:
2258:
129:
2681:
2868:. Grammatical gender is also marked to a lesser extent in natural gender languages, like English and Swedish, in which
2434:
478:
3378:"Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: the influence of time on attitudes and behavior"
125:
1928:
1911:
Stating "biological gender" can be considered POV, which is the main reason I have reverted you twice now (as seen
1659:
to be gender-specific. I hope this works much better. It seeemed very strange when I first read the article to see
1395:
185:
3280:"Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language Strategies"
2788:
Gabriel, Ute; Gygax, Pascal; Kuhn, Elisabeth (2018). "Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome?".
672:
109:
2390:
2345:
581:
3633:
2637:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
199:
3436:
1838:"Gender-neutral language aims to eliminate (or neutralize) reference to gender in terms that describe people."
1770:
1756:
1740:
595:
175:
1367:
647:
379:
237:
219:
3171:
MILLER, MEGAN M.; JAMES, LORI E. (2009). "Is the generic pronoun he still comprehended as excluding women?".
2607:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140714235019/https://www2.stetson.edu/secure/history/hy10302/nongenderlang.html
1858:
pseudo-gender-neutrality approaches aren't gender-neutral, but exclude some genders", which is a POV-wording.
1381:
3487:
3432:
3323:"The processing of the Dutch masculine generic zijn 'his' across stereotype contexts: An eye-tracking study"
2672:
2598:
2590:
2220:
1692:
1677:
1291:
1270:
1091:
1078:
1064:
1049:
1035:
1021:
1006:
991:
976:
961:
946:
932:
918:
903:
889:
876:
863:
840:
24:
2212:
1687:
If you would like to improve the article further, you could format the references so they appear properly.
1338:
1283:
553:
3609:
2554:
2203:
2048:
1900:
1719:
1638:
1596:
1563:
1418:
1346:
1308:
3440:
2070:
620:
55:
3629:
3067:
2719:
2656:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2644:
2142:). (Actually there might be similar proposals, but that is not what gender-neutrality means in general.)
2117:
How about the new version? As before, it's meant to be a basis for discussion and not be "edit-warring".
1525:
1437:
767:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
300:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2597:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2445:
tag (two tags which significantly annoy me, especially since they are so commonly carelessly applied).
70:
2397:
is nowadays also labeled to be gender-specific; the corresponding gender-neutral terms are said to be
3540:
3463:
3334:
2823:
2815:
2610:
2571:
1940:
to refer to male and females. If you want to include biological sex in the article, then just state "
1823:
141:
542:
467:
3617:
2865:
2309:(I mean the lead changes you restored), I don't see how they are an improvement. Compare them here:
1246:
626:
161:
1655:
I have amended my edit to include references and to mention, as you suggested, that some consider
575:
3596:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
3576:
3558:
3530:
3505:
3476:
3467:
moved to a /* Further reading */ section here, and then converted to footnotes as needed. Adding
3448:
3187:
2740:
2249:
2190:
2186:
2173:
2164:
2157:
2153:
2146:
2124:
1957:
1324:
1212:
1171:
1138:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
751:
204:
2641:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
661:
2857:
2657:
3406:
3399:
3359:
3352:
3301:
3258:
3221:
3180:
3154:
3111:
3104:
3056:
3040:
2991:
2489:
2450:
2270:
2113:
Well, I'm no experienced WP editor, and ok, I didn't notice that it was just a partial revert.
2086:
2069:
No very experienced Knowledge (XXG) editor would interpret my reverting you as vandalism. The
2000:
1969:
1949:
1703:
1623:
1580:
1547:
1252:"Backing musician" would work just fine for these situations, and would keep the focus on the
51:
633:
3389:
3342:
3291:
3250:
3213:
3146:
3096:
3047:
3032:
2983:
2797:
2770:
2730:
2715:
1964:
with "biological gender" to make it clear that we are not talking about grammatical gender.
1931:. Whether or not gender is biological or socially constructed, or both, is addressed in the
1799:
1543:
1517:
1433:
1151:
591:
201:
2664:
2567:
2119:
I first wanted to propose another version, but then had some doubts, namely: As there is "
1819:
284:
2163:"reference to gender in terms that describe people. Note that this does not refer to the
1879:
Thus the change was necessary to further clarify what "gender-neutrality" actually means.
1513:
3338:
3621:
3051:
3020:
2623:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1988:
1941:
1843:
Thus the change removed the ambiguity and made the sentence more clearly resp. correct.
1403:
1242:
436:
3546:
2663:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2630:
3646:
3572:
3554:
3526:
3501:
3472:
3444:
3254:
2736:
2442:
1320:
1231:
1208:
1167:
586:
2532:
Gender-neutralists 'destroy' language, and break orthographic and grammatical rules.
1390:
128.232.249.94 is right in this case, and you (88.104.254.41) might want to look at
366:
348:
3637:
3580:
3534:
3509:
3480:
3468:
3452:
2744:
2723:
2708:
2686:
2575:
2558:
2493:
2485:
2454:
2446:
2438:
2274:
2266:
2207:
2090:
2082:
2052:
2004:
1996:
1973:
1965:
1904:
1827:
1803:
1774:
1760:
1744:
1729:
1696:
1681:
1642:
1606:
1573:
1537:
1491:
1441:
1422:
1407:
1385:
1371:
1350:
1328:
1312:
1295:
1274:
1216:
1196:
1175:
1155:
203:
3217:
1787:
1458:
pleading to use "he" and "she" for animals and to stop using the speciesist "it").
3347:
3322:
1765:
Just so you know, my IP address has updated: I am still the same user as before.
3592:
2514:
One could add, and most likely should add, a section about problems and critism.
1795:
1724:
1601:
1568:
1391:
1187:
1134:
764:
3278:
Lindqvist, Anna; Renström, Emma Aurora; Gustafsson Sendén, Marie (2018-10-16).
2247:
No, I don't approve of your wording of "here this is not meant in the sense of
2160:
of words --" -- This maybe makes the first sentence quite long, maybe too long.
745:
278:
268:
250:
3296:
3279:
3100:
2987:
2774:
2629:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1494:, PS: 22:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC) (This section also edited by 80.133.125.112)
741:
678:
274:
3402:
3394:
3377:
3355:
3304:
3261:
3224:
3183:
3157:
3150:
3107:
3043:
3036:
2994:
2801:
1751:
tags to give properly formatted references. I hope you are happy with this.
1399:
3409:
3362:
3114:
3059:
2520:(Older) gender-neutral texts will be incorrectly seen as gender-unneutral.
3021:"Can Gender-Fair Language Reduce Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination?"
2911:
Recently, some instances of new gender neutral pronouns, such as English
1480:) is gender-binary" and "there are also gender-infinitiv-ists forms". So
297:
3190:
1791:
1376:
What on earth are you on about? How can there be more than two genders?
3376:
Gustafsson Sendén, Marie; Bäck, Emma A.; Lindqvist, Anna (2015-07-01).
2869:
2853:
1790:. Any job title with the suffix '-man' can be taken as gender neutral,
1238:
2535:
Some gender-neutrality approaches are gender-binary, or even sexists:
2156:-- ..." or "reference to gender of living creatures -- and not to the
735:
717:
2120:
1992:
1945:
1932:
1889:
Thus the change removed some POV by mentioning other interpretations.
1749:
I have just gone through and updated the references with <url: -->
3019:
Sczesny, Sabine; Formanowicz, Magda; Moser, Franziska (2016-02-02).
2510:
More information: Problems and criticism of gender-neutral language
1893:
All in all, the change from 9th August removed ambiguities and POV.
2611:
https://www2.stetson.edu/secure/history/hy10302/nongenderlang.html
1626:: the Japanese language does not have grammatical gender, but the
2185:
describe people to neuters, such as "das Lehrer"), then "not ...
3321:
Redl, Theresa; Eerland, Anita; Sanders, Ted J. M. (2018-10-18).
2849:
2526:
It is more difficult to understand (some) gender-neutral texts.
2152:"reference to gender -- here this is not meant in the sense of
1982:
1476:
are gender-binary-ists"). - that says "using Binnen-I (as in
814:
213:
205:
15:
1987:
mean sexual activity. So that's another reason that stating "
2830:, which can be mined for useful material to be merged here.
2127:", that is a link to other article? Compare the following:
2601:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3587:
Wiki Education assignment: Industry Theory and Practice
2940:
or double-forms (feminization strategy) since the 80s.
2822:
The following is a copy of the four body sections from
2594:
2481:
2306:
2302:
2254:
2078:
2074:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1398:
As such, I will make suggested change to this article.
614:
Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs of gender studies
1234:
has played with other known musicians as a side-woman.
160:
2138:) into something like "unu enfant" (a new no-gender,
1182:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
1129:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
763:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
296:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2633:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1927:, your edit in that regard is at conflict with the
1792:
as that suffix can mean "human", rather than "male"
174:
1227:I recently discovered this sentence in an article:
797:This article has not yet received a rating on the
413:This article has not yet received a rating on the
330:This article has not yet received a rating on the
2838:A copy of body content from Gender fair language.
1869:(female teacher - and thus not male teacher) and
2566:section without a rationale section is bizarre.
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2077:shows me reverting you on the lead, but not on
1952:" has no Knowledge (XXG) article. Furthermore,
1884:sounds POV-like, so would need an improvement).
2619:This message was posted before February 2018.
2348:; the corresponding gender-neutral terms are
8:
2735:None, in my opinion. But see next section.
2134:" and "une enfant" (grammatically feminine,
1854:Thus the change was neutral and removed POV.
1503:The Japanese language, and original research
1507:Currently a line within the article reads:
217:
3673:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
3139:Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
2943:
2922:Feminization and neutralization strategies
2833:
2790:Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
2692:Gender-neutral versus gender fair language
2589:I have just modified one external link on
2210:
1336:
1223:This seems like a good place to post this.
837:
826:
712:
461:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
444:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
422:
393:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Gender studies
343:
245:
3393:
3346:
3295:
3050:
1205:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
1164:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
691:Gender studies articles needing attention
536:Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
3688:Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
2960:
2757:
1788:"Policeman" is as ambiguous as chairman
1203:Above undated message substituted from
1162:Above undated message substituted from
777:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Linguistics
714:
345:
247:
3065:
3316:
3314:
3273:
3271:
310:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Languages
7:
3658:Unknown-importance language articles
3236:
3234:
3132:
3130:
3128:
3126:
3124:
3089:Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
3014:
3012:
3010:
3008:
3006:
3004:
2968:
2966:
2964:
757:This article is within the scope of
290:This article is within the scope of
3678:WikiProject Gender studies articles
3668:Start-Class Gender studies articles
396:Template:WikiProject Gender studies
236:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
3601:
3597:
3243:Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
3173:The American Journal of Psychology
3072:: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
2561:& 18:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
1396:difference between sex and gender.
1143:
1139:
457:Unassessed Gender studies articles
14:
2933:shows results of no gender bias.
2593:. Please take a moment to review
1907:, PS 23:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
1818:. Further opinions are welcome.
1237:I linked it (side-woman) to the
600:Women's education in Saudi Arabia
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
3693:WikiProject Linguistics articles
3683:Start-Class Linguistics articles
3604:. Further details are available
3591:
3563:
3545:
3516:
3492:
3255:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00650.x
2189:" could be "not necessarily ...
1186:
1146:. Further details are available
1133:
818:
780:Template:WikiProject Linguistics
744:
734:
716:
435:
365:
347:
277:
267:
249:
218:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
3206:Journal of Cognitive Psychology
2303:the other lead changes you made
1810:RfC: The MoS and the generic he
1628:speech of men and women differs
3663:WikiProject Languages articles
3514:Port sourced content to Talk.
2255:changed the lead to the latter
313:Template:WikiProject Languages
1:
3653:Start-Class language articles
3628:— Assignment last updated by
3218:10.1080/20445911.2017.1326923
2167:of words." or "... Note that
1833:Changes from 9th August 2015
1804:15:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
1775:20:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
1761:20:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
1745:19:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
1730:19:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
1697:12:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
1682:12:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
1408:15:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
771:and see a list of open tasks.
304:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
3638:17:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
3561:) 03:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
3348:10.1371/journal.pone.0205903
2948:Click '' to view References.
2724:17:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
2709:17:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
1622:"A distinct issue arises in
1386:13:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1329:19:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
1275:14:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
1217:22:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
1176:21:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
3435:, and can be referenced by
2687:23:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
2559:23:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
2494:13:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
2455:22:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
2275:22:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
2208:20:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
2091:18:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
2053:18:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
2005:00:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
1974:00:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
1905:17:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
1492:21:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
1442:20:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
1351:05:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
3709:
2845:Grammatical gender marking
2650:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2586:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2576:03:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
1929:sex and gender distinction
1643:21:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
1423:21:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
1313:21:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
799:project's importance scale
415:project's importance scale
375:WikiProject Gender studies
332:project's importance scale
3581:21:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
3535:02:06, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
3453:03:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
3297:10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9
3101:10.1007/s10936-010-9164-9
2988:10.1007/s11199-011-0083-5
2775:10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9
2123:", should there also be "
2079:the other stuff you added
1828:18:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
796:
729:
582:Brannon Masculinity Scale
421:
412:
360:
329:
262:
244:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
3510:19:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
3481:19:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
3395:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00893
3151:10.1177/1368430218771742
3037:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00025
2802:10.1177/1368430218771742
2745:19:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
2714:What's the difference??
2701:Thisisquitealongusername
2437:and could earn itself a
1816:RfCs at the village pump
1651:Response to EvergreenFir
1607:20:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
1574:19:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
1538:07:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
1470:whatever form (e.g. the
1372:23:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
1296:18:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
596:Michael Kaufman (author)
372:This article is part of
3486:Move Gfl references to
3382:Frontiers in Psychology
3025:Frontiers in Psychology
2591:Gender-neutral language
2582:External links modified
2336:For example, the words
2075:my latest revert of you
841:Gender-neutral language
760:WikiProject Linguistics
399:Gender studies articles
25:Gender-neutral language
2814:Port of material from
2385:For example, the word
2305:and the followup edit
226:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
3608:. Student editor(s):
2769:. 81 (1-2): 109-117.
2263:WP:Dispute resolution
2073:policy is clear. And
1195:. Student editor(s):
1150:. Student editor(s):
1050:In specific languages
890:Terminology and views
511:/Sexuality and gender
387:for more information.
293:WikiProject Languages
230:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
3541:Gender fair language
3464:Gender fair language
2864:"teacher; m."), and
2824:Gender fair language
2816:Gender fair language
2631:regular verification
1948:." As you can see, "
783:Linguistics articles
641:Gender studies stubs
105:No original research
3616:). Peer reviewers:
3339:2018PLoSO..1305903R
2908:Novel neutral forms
2866:possessive pronouns
2621:After February 2018
2259:WP:Silent consensus
2171:here does not mean
844:
627:History of feminism
3606:on the course page
2883:Feminization forms
2675:InternetArchiveBot
2626:InternetArchiveBot
2250:grammatical gender
2191:grammatical gender
2187:grammatical gender
2174:grammatical gender
2165:grammatical gender
2158:grammatical gender
2154:grammatical gender
2147:grammatical gender
2125:grammatical gender
1958:grammatical gender
1193:on the course page
1148:on the course page
838:
752:Linguistics portal
232:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
3610:Marzipan Calicoco
3598:13 September 2022
3458:Merge in progress
3428:
3427:
3423:
3422:
2870:animate referents
2651:
2435:WP:Weasel wording
2224:
2215:comment added by
1950:biological gender
1919:). Like I stated
1728:
1605:
1572:
1514:original research
1353:
1341:comment added by
1286:comment added by
1123:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1113:
919:Gender indication
839:Section size for
813:
812:
809:
808:
805:
804:
711:
710:
707:
706:
703:
702:
699:
698:
342:
341:
338:
337:
316:language articles
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
3700:
3640:
3630:MammothSunflower
3614:article contribs
3603:
3602:19 December 2022
3599:
3595:
3571:
3567:
3566:
3549:
3524:
3520:
3519:
3500:
3496:
3495:
3488:#Further reading
3433:#Further reading
3414:
3413:
3397:
3373:
3367:
3366:
3350:
3333:(10): e0205903.
3318:
3309:
3308:
3299:
3290:(1–2): 109–117.
3275:
3266:
3265:
3238:
3229:
3228:
3201:
3195:
3194:
3168:
3162:
3161:
3134:
3119:
3118:
3084:
3078:
3077:
3071:
3063:
3054:
3016:
2999:
2998:
2982:(3–4): 268–281.
2970:
2944:
2919:, were created.
2873:match its need.
2834:
2806:
2805:
2785:
2779:
2778:
2762:
2734:
2685:
2676:
2649:
2648:
2627:
2403:flight attendant
2354:flight attendant
1735:gender-neutral.
1722:
1716:
1713:
1710:
1707:
1599:
1593:
1590:
1587:
1584:
1566:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1551:
1522:
1298:
1219:
1190:
1178:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1067:
1052:
1024:
1009:
994:
979:
964:
949:
921:
906:
845:
827:
822:
821:
815:
785:
784:
781:
778:
775:
754:
749:
748:
738:
731:
730:
720:
713:
592:Media and gender
504:Deletion sorting
439:
432:
431:
423:
401:
400:
397:
394:
391:
369:
362:
361:
351:
344:
318:
317:
314:
311:
308:
287:
282:
281:
271:
264:
263:
253:
246:
229:
223:
222:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
3708:
3707:
3703:
3702:
3701:
3699:
3698:
3697:
3643:
3642:
3627:
3589:
3564:
3562:
3517:
3515:
3493:
3491:
3460:
3437:Short footnotes
3429:
3424:
3419:
3418:
3417:
3375:
3374:
3370:
3320:
3319:
3312:
3277:
3276:
3269:
3240:
3239:
3232:
3203:
3202:
3198:
3170:
3169:
3165:
3136:
3135:
3122:
3086:
3085:
3081:
3064:
3018:
3017:
3002:
2972:
2971:
2962:
2949:
2923:
2909:
2887:
2884:
2877:
2846:
2839:
2820:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2787:
2786:
2782:
2764:
2763:
2759:
2728:
2694:
2679:
2674:
2642:
2635:have permission
2625:
2599:this simple FaQ
2584:
2512:
2391:gender-specific
2346:gender-specific
2034:Regarding that
1835:
1812:
1714:
1711:
1708:
1705:
1653:
1591:
1588:
1585:
1582:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1536:
1518:
1505:
1360:
1358:"Either gender"
1281:
1262:
1225:
1202:
1184:
1161:
1140:11 January 2021
1131:
1119:
1092:Further reading
1063:
1048:
1020:
1005:
990:
975:
960:
945:
917:
902:
832:
819:
782:
779:
776:
773:
772:
750:
743:
695:
685:Needs attention
398:
395:
392:
389:
388:
315:
312:
309:
306:
305:
285:Language portal
283:
276:
227:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
3706:
3704:
3696:
3695:
3690:
3685:
3680:
3675:
3670:
3665:
3660:
3655:
3645:
3644:
3618:Benevolent Bat
3588:
3585:
3584:
3583:
3537:
3512:
3459:
3456:
3426:
3425:
3421:
3420:
3416:
3415:
3368:
3310:
3267:
3249:(5): 451–457.
3230:
3212:(7): 795–808.
3196:
3179:(4): 483–496.
3163:
3145:(5): 844–858.
3120:
3095:(3): 195–203.
3079:
3000:
2959:
2958:
2954:
2951:
2950:
2947:
2942:
2921:
2907:
2885:
2882:
2875:
2844:
2841:
2840:
2837:
2832:
2826:from revision
2819:
2812:
2808:
2807:
2780:
2756:
2755:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2693:
2690:
2669:
2668:
2661:
2614:
2613:
2605:Added archive
2583:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2546:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2540:
2533:
2530:
2527:
2524:
2521:
2515:
2511:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2399:police officer
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2350:police officer
2321:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2161:
2150:
2143:
2136:a female child
2114:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2029:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2017:
2016:information...
2008:
2007:
1989:biological sex
1977:
1976:
1942:biological sex
1894:
1891:
1890:
1888:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1878:
1859:
1856:
1853:
1848:
1844:
1842:
1839:
1834:
1831:
1811:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1767:86.158.180.245
1753:86.158.180.245
1737:86.158.180.245
1652:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1641:) 21:33 &
1631:
1620:
1616:
1610:
1609:
1576:
1524:
1504:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1485:
1466:
1459:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1426:
1425:
1364:128.232.249.94
1359:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1316:
1315:
1261:
1258:
1236:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1183:
1180:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1081:
1075:
1074:
1071:
1068:
1065:Related topics
1060:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1045:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1017:
1016:
1013:
1010:
1002:
1001:
998:
995:
987:
986:
983:
980:
972:
971:
968:
965:
957:
956:
953:
950:
942:
941:
938:
935:
929:
928:
925:
922:
914:
913:
910:
907:
899:
898:
895:
892:
886:
885:
882:
879:
873:
872:
869:
866:
860:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
843:(17 sections)
834:
833:
830:
825:
823:
811:
810:
807:
806:
803:
802:
795:
789:
788:
786:
769:the discussion
756:
755:
739:
727:
726:
721:
709:
708:
705:
704:
701:
700:
697:
696:
694:
693:
681:
668:
657:
643:
629:
616:
602:
571:
560:
549:
538:
524:
513:
499:
488:
486:/Collaboration
474:
463:
443:
441:
440:
428:
427:
419:
418:
411:
405:
404:
402:
390:Gender studies
370:
358:
357:
355:Gender studies
352:
340:
339:
336:
335:
328:
322:
321:
319:
302:the discussion
289:
288:
272:
260:
259:
254:
242:
241:
235:
224:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3705:
3694:
3691:
3689:
3686:
3684:
3681:
3679:
3676:
3674:
3671:
3669:
3666:
3664:
3661:
3659:
3656:
3654:
3651:
3650:
3648:
3641:
3639:
3635:
3631:
3625:
3623:
3619:
3615:
3611:
3607:
3594:
3586:
3582:
3578:
3574:
3570:
3560:
3556:
3553:
3552:
3548:
3542:
3538:
3536:
3532:
3528:
3523:
3513:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3499:
3489:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3478:
3474:
3470:
3465:
3462:A merge from
3457:
3455:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3442:
3438:
3434:
3411:
3408:
3404:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3387:
3383:
3379:
3372:
3369:
3364:
3361:
3357:
3354:
3349:
3344:
3340:
3336:
3332:
3328:
3324:
3317:
3315:
3311:
3306:
3303:
3298:
3293:
3289:
3285:
3281:
3274:
3272:
3268:
3263:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3237:
3235:
3231:
3226:
3223:
3219:
3215:
3211:
3207:
3200:
3197:
3192:
3189:
3185:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3167:
3164:
3159:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3144:
3140:
3133:
3131:
3129:
3127:
3125:
3121:
3116:
3113:
3109:
3106:
3102:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3083:
3080:
3075:
3069:
3061:
3058:
3053:
3049:
3045:
3042:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3026:
3022:
3015:
3013:
3011:
3009:
3007:
3005:
3001:
2996:
2993:
2989:
2985:
2981:
2977:
2969:
2967:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2953:
2952:
2946:
2945:
2941:
2939:
2934:
2932:
2927:
2920:
2918:
2914:
2906:
2904:
2900:
2896:
2891:
2881:
2874:
2871:
2867:
2863:
2860:(e.g. German
2859:
2855:
2851:
2843:
2842:
2836:
2835:
2831:
2829:
2825:
2817:
2813:
2803:
2799:
2795:
2791:
2784:
2781:
2776:
2772:
2768:
2761:
2758:
2754:
2746:
2742:
2738:
2732:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2721:
2717:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2706:
2702:
2698:
2691:
2689:
2688:
2683:
2678:
2677:
2666:
2662:
2659:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2646:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2622:
2617:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2603:
2602:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2587:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2541:
2537:
2536:
2534:
2531:
2528:
2525:
2522:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2509:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2456:
2452:
2448:
2444:
2443:Template:Whom
2440:
2436:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2251:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2192:
2188:
2183:
2182:
2176:
2175:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2148:
2144:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2128:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2115:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2037:
2033:
2032:
2030:
2027:
2024:
2023:
2018:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1985:
1984:
1980:Furthermore,
1979:
1978:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1886:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1855:
1852:more genders.
1849:
1845:
1837:
1836:
1832:
1830:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1786:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1750:</url: -->
1748:
1747:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1726:
1721:
1718:
1717:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1662:
1658:
1650:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1608:
1603:
1598:
1595:
1594:
1577:
1575:
1570:
1565:
1562:
1561:
1545:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1521:
1515:
1510:
1502:
1493:
1490:
1486:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1460:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1378:88.104.254.41
1374:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1357:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:80.254.146.20
1259:
1257:
1255:
1250:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1233:
1222:
1220:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1200:
1198:
1194:
1189:
1181:
1179:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1159:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1144:12 April 2021
1136:
1128:
1126:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1007:United States
1004:
1003:
999:
996:
993:
989:
988:
984:
981:
978:
974:
973:
969:
966:
963:
959:
958:
954:
951:
948:
944:
943:
939:
936:
934:
931:
930:
926:
923:
920:
916:
915:
911:
908:
905:
901:
900:
896:
893:
891:
888:
887:
883:
880:
878:
875:
874:
870:
867:
865:
862:
861:
855:
850:
847:
846:
842:
836:
835:
831:Section sizes
829:
828:
824:
817:
816:
800:
794:
791:
790:
787:
770:
766:
762:
761:
753:
747:
742:
740:
737:
733:
732:
728:
725:
722:
719:
715:
692:
688:
686:
682:
680:
677:
675:
674:
669:
666:
664:
663:
658:
656:
652:
650:
649:
644:
642:
638:
636:
635:
630:
628:
625:
623:
622:
617:
615:
611:
609:
608:
603:
601:
597:
593:
589:
588:
587:Holy Virility
583:
580:
578:
577:
572:
569:
567:
566:
561:
558:
556:
555:
550:
547:
545:
544:
539:
537:
533:
531:
530:
525:
522:
520:
519:
514:
512:
508:
506:
505:
500:
497:
495:
494:
489:
487:
483:
481:
480:
475:
472:
470:
469:
464:
462:
458:
454:
452:
451:
446:
445:
442:
438:
434:
433:
430:
429:
425:
424:
420:
416:
410:
407:
406:
403:
386:
381:
377:
376:
371:
368:
364:
363:
359:
356:
353:
350:
346:
333:
327:
324:
323:
320:
303:
299:
295:
294:
286:
280:
275:
273:
270:
266:
265:
261:
258:
255:
252:
248:
243:
239:
233:
225:
221:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
3626:
3590:
3568:
3550:
3544:
3521:
3497:
3469:User:Elmidae
3461:
3443:if desired.
3430:
3385:
3381:
3371:
3330:
3326:
3287:
3283:
3246:
3242:
3209:
3205:
3199:
3176:
3172:
3166:
3142:
3138:
3092:
3088:
3082:
3068:cite journal
3028:
3024:
2979:
2975:
2955:
2937:
2935:
2930:
2928:
2924:
2916:
2915:and Swedish
2912:
2910:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2892:
2888:
2886:Generic male
2878:
2861:
2847:
2821:
2793:
2789:
2783:
2766:
2760:
2752:
2699:
2695:
2673:
2670:
2645:source check
2624:
2618:
2615:
2588:
2585:
2551:84.161.10.58
2547:
2513:
2439:Template:Who
2402:
2398:
2394:
2386:
2353:
2349:
2341:
2337:
2248:
2217:84.161.33.10
2211:— Preceding
2200:84.161.10.58
2172:
2168:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2116:
2071:WP:Vandalism
2045:84.161.10.58
2035:
1981:
1961:
1953:
1937:
1897:84.161.10.58
1892:
1877:( teacher).)
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1850:
1813:
1704:
1689:31.49.243.63
1674:31.49.243.63
1669:
1665:
1660:
1656:
1654:
1635:84.161.10.58
1581:
1548:
1519:
1508:
1506:
1489:84.161.10.58
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1461:
1454:
1415:84.161.10.58
1389:
1375:
1361:
1343:80.43.56.254
1337:— Preceding
1317:
1305:84.161.10.58
1288:92.19.142.11
1282:— Preceding
1278:
1263:
1253:
1251:
1230:
1226:
1201:
1185:
1160:
1132:
1124:
848:Section name
758:
684:
683:
671:
670:
660:
659:
655:/translation
646:
645:
632:
631:
619:
618:
605:
604:
585:
574:
573:
563:
562:
552:
551:
541:
540:
527:
526:
516:
515:
502:
501:
491:
490:
477:
476:
466:
465:
448:
447:
385:project page
373:
291:
238:WikiProjects
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2899:hairdresser
2731:Georgia guy
2716:Georgia guy
2301:Looking at
2036:Furthermore
1865:or Spanish
1544:Benlisquare
1520:benlisquare
1434:Pete unseth
1392:Genderqueer
1260:"Chairman"?
1152:Clairenelms
1022:Philippines
933:Controversy
774:Linguistics
765:linguistics
724:Linguistics
667:edit to see
570:edit to see
559:edit to see
548:edit to see
523:edit to see
498:edit to see
479:Collaborate
473:edit to see
426:To-do list:
380:WikiProject
228:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
3647:Categories
3441:named refs
2956:References
2876:Motivation
2862:der Lehrer
2858:role nouns
2753:References
2682:Report bug
2568:Dingsuntil
2387:stewardess
2342:stewardess
1820:Darkfrog24
1670:stewardess
1455:Specicism:
1079:References
679:Riot grrrl
554:Notability
3622:Perdidojj
3539:Redirect
3403:1664-1078
3356:1932-6203
3305:0360-0025
3284:Sex Roles
3262:0036-5564
3225:2044-5911
3184:0002-9556
3158:1368-4302
3108:0090-6905
3044:1664-1078
2995:0360-0025
2976:Sex Roles
2828:961722996
2767:Sex Roles
2665:this tool
2658:this tool
2395:policeman
2338:policeman
1867:profesora
1723:Please {{
1666:policeman
1600:Please {{
1567:Please {{
1243:Carptrash
947:Argentina
648:Translate
307:Languages
298:languages
257:Languages
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
3573:Mathglot
3555:Mathglot
3527:Mathglot
3502:Mathglot
3473:Mathglot
3445:Mathglot
3410:26191016
3363:30335820
3327:PLOS ONE
3191:27784423
3115:21120608
3060:26869947
2854:pronouns
2737:Mathglot
2671:Cheers.—
2539:sexist.)
2482:Reverted
2393:, while
2213:unsigned
2132:a child
1875:profesor
1863:Lehrerin
1661:chairman
1657:chairman
1624:Japanese
1478:LehrerIn
1472:Binnen-I
1462:Genders:
1394:and the
1339:unsigned
1321:Hanieh.g
1284:unsigned
1209:PrimeBOT
1168:PrimeBOT
1036:See also
493:Copyedit
378:. This
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
3551:Pending
3335:Bibcode
3052:4735429
2818:article
2595:my edit
2486:Flyer22
2447:Flyer22
2267:Flyer22
2140:a child
2083:Flyer22
1997:Flyer22
1966:Flyer22
1482:somehow
1432:gender.
1239:sideman
1197:Jjac118
1156:Jeyonce
1110:32,136
940:10,031
904:General
877:History
856:Section
576:Orphans
529:Infobox
468:Cleanup
154:WP refs
142:scholar
3031:: 25.
2903:banker
2901:, and
2895:server
2169:gender
2121:gender
1993:gender
1962:gender
1954:gender
1946:gender
1938:gender
1933:Gender
1871:Lehrer
1847:time.)
1796:JudahH
1720:(talk)
1597:(talk)
1564:(talk)
1232:Goffin
1107:32,136
1099:3,350
1000:2,366
985:1,997
977:France
970:2,225
962:Canada
955:1,746
927:3,051
912:3,592
897:6,670
884:4,953
871:6,297
858:total
673:Verify
662:Update
518:Expand
450:Assess
234:scale.
126:Google
3188:JSTOR
2931:zijn,
2850:nouns
2796:(5).
1619:here:
1319:here.
1104:Total
1096:3,350
997:2,366
992:Italy
982:1,997
967:2,225
952:1,746
924:3,051
909:3,592
881:4,953
868:6,297
864:(Top)
853:count
634:Stubs
621:Split
607:Photo
543:Merge
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
3634:talk
3600:and
3577:talk
3569:Done
3559:talk
3531:talk
3522:Done
3506:talk
3498:Done
3477:talk
3449:talk
3407:PMID
3400:ISSN
3360:PMID
3353:ISSN
3302:ISSN
3259:ISSN
3222:ISSN
3181:ISSN
3155:ISSN
3112:PMID
3105:ISSN
3074:link
3057:PMID
3041:ISSN
3029:7:25
2992:ISSN
2741:talk
2720:talk
2705:talk
2572:talk
2555:talk
2490:talk
2451:talk
2401:and
2352:and
2344:are
2340:and
2307:here
2271:talk
2221:talk
2204:talk
2087:talk
2049:talk
2001:talk
1970:talk
1925:here
1923:and
1921:here
1917:here
1915:and
1913:here
1901:talk
1824:talk
1800:talk
1771:talk
1757:talk
1741:talk
1693:talk
1678:talk
1668:and
1639:talk
1516:. --
1465:all.
1438:talk
1419:talk
1404:talk
1400:602p
1382:talk
1368:talk
1347:talk
1325:talk
1309:talk
1292:talk
1271:talk
1254:role
1247:talk
1213:talk
1172:talk
1142:and
1073:580
1058:214
1043:807
1030:876
1015:764
851:Byte
689:see
653:see
639:see
612:see
565:NPOV
534:see
509:see
484:see
459:and
455:see
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
3439:or
3390:doi
3343:doi
3292:doi
3251:doi
3214:doi
3177:122
3147:doi
3097:doi
3048:PMC
3033:doi
2984:doi
2917:hen
2798:doi
2771:doi
2639:RfC
2609:to
2441:or
2389:is
1991:or
1983:sex
1944:or
1873:or
1715:Fir
1712:een
1709:rgr
1706:Eve
1592:Fir
1589:een
1586:rgr
1583:Eve
1559:Fir
1556:een
1553:rgr
1550:Eve
1207:by
1166:by
1086:28
1070:580
1055:214
1027:876
1012:764
793:???
409:???
326:???
176:TWL
3649::
3636:)
3624:.
3620:,
3579:)
3543:.
3533:)
3525:.
3508:)
3490::
3479:)
3471:.
3451:)
3405:.
3398:.
3388:.
3384:.
3380:.
3358:.
3351:.
3341:.
3331:13
3329:.
3325:.
3313:^
3300:.
3288:81
3286:.
3282:.
3270:^
3257:.
3247:49
3245:.
3233:^
3220:.
3210:29
3208:.
3186:.
3175:.
3153:.
3143:21
3141:.
3123:^
3110:.
3103:.
3093:40
3091:.
3070:}}
3066:{{
3055:.
3046:.
3039:.
3027:.
3023:.
3003:^
2990:.
2980:66
2978:.
2963:^
2938:he
2913:ze
2897:,
2856:,
2852:,
2794:21
2792:.
2743:)
2722:)
2707:)
2652:.
2647:}}
2643:{{
2574:)
2557:)
2492:)
2484:.
2453:)
2273:)
2265:.
2223:)
2206:)
2193:".
2177:."
2149:".
2089:)
2051:)
2003:)
1972:)
1903:)
1826:)
1802:)
1794:.
1773:)
1759:)
1743:)
1727:}}
1725:re
1695:)
1680:)
1672:.
1604:}}
1602:re
1571:}}
1569:re
1440:)
1421:)
1406:)
1384:)
1370:)
1349:)
1327:)
1311:)
1294:)
1273:)
1249:)
1215:)
1199:.
1174:)
1158:.
1154:,
1083:28
1040:13
937:57
894:27
598:·
594:·
590:·
584:·
156:)
54:;
3632:(
3612:(
3575:(
3557:(
3529:(
3504:(
3475:(
3447:(
3412:.
3392::
3386:6
3365:.
3345::
3337::
3307:.
3294::
3264:.
3253::
3227:.
3216::
3193:.
3160:.
3149::
3117:.
3099::
3076:)
3062:.
3035::
2997:.
2986::
2804:.
2800::
2777:.
2773::
2739:(
2733::
2729:@
2718:(
2703:(
2684:)
2680:(
2667:.
2660:.
2570:(
2553:(
2549:-
2488:(
2449:(
2405:.
2356:.
2269:(
2219:(
2202:(
2198:-
2085:(
2047:(
2043:-
1999:(
1968:(
1899:(
1895:-
1822:(
1798:(
1769:(
1755:(
1739:(
1691:(
1676:(
1637:(
1633:-
1534:E
1532:•
1530:C
1528:•
1526:T
1487:-
1474:)
1436:(
1417:(
1402:(
1380:(
1366:(
1345:(
1323:(
1307:(
1303:-
1290:(
1269:(
1245:(
1229:"
1211:(
1170:(
801:.
687::
676::
665::
651::
637::
624::
610::
579::
568::
557::
546::
532::
521::
507::
496::
482::
471::
453::
417:.
334:.
240::
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.