492:
472:
451:
423:
398:
375:
362:
341:
325:
313:
282:
245:
42:
188:"the design of which was based on the lessons learned from the torpedoing of Prinz Eugen and Lützow, both of which had been torpedoed earlier in the year" - one less variant of 'torpedoed' would make this read better (eg, "the design of which was based on the lessons learned from torpedoing of Prinz Eugen and Lützow earlier in the year")
185:"One of the surviving ships radioed the location of the German battleships, which summoned the powerful British battleships Rodney and King George V." - this is a bit imprecise - the merchant ship didn't 'summon' the battleships with its signal, but rather led the RN to dispatch the battleships.
213:"increasing Allied anti-submarine capabilities were steadily degrading the effectiveness of the U-boats" is putting it mildly. By late 1943 the U-boat force in the North Atlantic had been throughly beaten and any major operations in this area led to crippling losses.
178:
was engaged and sunk by the heavy covering force which was supporting Convoy JW 55B and ships from the Convoy's escort, not "British naval patrols" (which implies that the
British ships just happened to be in the
210:"On 15 March, the two battleships, with the two tankers in company, encountered a dispersed convoy in the mid-Atlantic" - again, please name this convoy (it should also be linked as the action is clearly notable)
169:"she was laid down on 15 June 1935 and launched a year and four months later on 3 October 1936" - 'year and four months later' seems unnecessary seeing as you're providing the exact dates of these events as well
460:
to a US Navy sailor seems unlikely to be correct, but this should be PD-UK Gov given its age and where it was taken (from the deck of a
British aircraft carrier it would seem) so there are no major dramas
47:
126:
122:
80:
107:
52:
207:
and reflected poorly on the German Navy's fighting spirit) and these views should be covered when the article is developed further, along with any counter-arguments.
182:"in an attempt to lure Ramillies away from the convoy so that Gneisenau could attack the convoy" - I'd suggest rewording this to remove one of the uses of 'convoy'
70:
99:
276:
203:
and her sister not engaging convoy HX-106 (on the grounds that this was unnecessarily cautious given the extent to which they outclassed the obsolete HMS
223:
445:
457:
115:
17:
75:
335:
367:
I've also made some comments above about clarifying some parts of the article, but these are minor issues and easily addressed
92:
256:
172:"longest-range naval gunfire hits" is a bit awkward and isn't cited in the body of the article (though it is correct)
299:
417:
196:"On 22 February, the pair spotted an empty convoy sailing west" - the name of this convoy should be included
437:
307:
264:
227:
155:
388:
260:
151:
466:
272:
268:
199:
A lot of postwar books covering the German surface fleet have been very critical about
250:
I've made some suggestions above, but the general quality is sufficient for GA class
147:
165:
The prose is generally very good, but I have a few minor suggestions:
465:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
497:
Great work, I look forward to seeing this at a ACR or FAC
444:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
134:
103:
192:
I also have some comments on the article's content:
322:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
141:I'll review this article over this weekend.
8:
30:
61:
33:
7:
458:File:HMS Glorious last picture.jpg
395:Fair representation without bias:
24:
18:Talk:German battleship Scharnhorst
490:
470:
449:
421:
396:
373:
360:
339:
323:
311:
280:
243:
1:
491:
471:
450:
422:
397:
374:
361:
340:
324:
312:
281:
244:
156:10:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
516:
441:to illustrate the topic?
237:reasonably well written
354:broad in its coverage
308:References to sources
336:No original research
456:The attribution of
446:fair use rationales
359:A. Major aspects:
295:factually accurate
242:A. Prose quality:
467:suitable captions
89:
88:
507:
494:
493:
474:
473:
453:
452:
425:
424:
400:
399:
377:
376:
364:
363:
343:
342:
327:
326:
315:
314:
284:
283:
247:
246:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
515:
514:
510:
509:
508:
506:
505:
504:
259:compliance for
220:
163:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
513:
511:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
489:Pass or Fail:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
463:
462:
461:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
370:
369:
368:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
332:
331:
330:
320:
319:
318:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
269:words to watch
253:
252:
251:
219:
216:
215:
214:
211:
208:
197:
190:
189:
186:
183:
180:
173:
170:
162:
159:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
512:
496:
495:
488:
487:
485:
482:
476:
475:
468:
464:
459:
455:
454:
447:
443:
442:
440:
439:
433:
427:
426:
419:
415:
414:
412:
408:
402:
401:
394:
393:
391:
390:
385:
379:
378:
371:
366:
365:
358:
357:
355:
351:
345:
344:
337:
333:
329:
328:
321:
317:
316:
309:
305:
304:
302:
301:
296:
292:
286:
285:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
241:
240:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
229:
226:review – see
225:
217:
212:
209:
206:
202:
198:
195:
194:
193:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
167:
166:
160:
158:
157:
153:
149:
146:
142:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
483:
435:
410:
387:
372:B. Focused:
353:
298:
294:
236:
230:for criteria
222:
221:
204:
200:
191:
175:
164:
144:
143:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
201:Scharnhorst
176:Scharnhorst
104:visual edit
300:verifiable
218:Assessment
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
418:edit wars
205:Ramillies
145:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
436:contain
434:Does it
228:WP:WIAGA
161:Comments
76:Criteria
484:Overall
420:, etc:
389:neutral
273:fiction
127:history
108:history
94:Article
438:images
411:stable
409:Is it
386:Is it
352:Is it
293:Is it
275:, and
265:layout
235:Is it
148:Nick-D
277:lists
179:area)
136:Watch
16:<
297:and
261:lead
152:talk
123:edit
100:edit
416:No
334:C.
306:A.
257:MoS
255:B.
486::
469::
448::
413:?
392:?
356:?
338::
310::
303:?
279::
271:,
267:,
263:,
239:?
224:GA
154:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
150:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.