382:
164:
121:
107:
362:
348:
338:
314:
188:
174:
283:
273:
234:
224:
477:
Fixed ref 1 formatting, found BBC article for ref 7. I ahve given the article a quick prose rewrite, but will message Jacky for explanation of "Peacock prose" as I cannot find anything on it in Wiki. The content seems ok, maybe a little brief on the 1978 season, but will leave that up to others to
402:
again. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. (If you are really busy, let me know and I'll give more time. I need to know however so I can see that someone is interested in addressing
536:
Hi, sorry its been a while, I've been very busy that last couple of weeks. I will have to hold off on the prose review (Although I will come to it when I can), but I can safely say that this article is in no danger of being delisted and will certainly pass when the review is complete. Regards.
134:
The prose is poor, perhaps 4/10. Many sections are messy, and the article is improperly organised - it should be a chronology of his career with the most important races highlighted, not in a section of their own. Some parts of the article suffer from
Peacock prose and other
418:
Made a start on the most obvious stuff. The way I see it the remaining work is reformatting refs (probably easiest to use templates), adding refs where necessary, an end to end re-write with a particular eye to
82:
201:
Most of the online references are inproperly formatted, there are numerous tags and big banner tags indicating sourcing problems. It also looks like a number of references may be unreliable (Youtube?).
519:
In reply to the message on my talk page, the article now seems to cover his F1 career adequately, although I notice one or two minor prose issues which will will hihghlight when I do my final review.--
66:
451:
Just an update: obvious there is still more to do here. However, since work is progressing I am very happy to extend this review as long as required.--
62:
496:. "exceptionally popular not only with fans" as copied below - is an excellent example of peacock prose - unqualified and unreferenced praise.--
47:
354:
39:
180:
423:. A week should be OK, but I've got quite a few RealLife demands on my time at present so that assessment may change. Cheers.
113:
150:
89:. In reviewing the article, I have found that this article has massive issues that need to be urgently addressed.
390:
I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a
55:
17:
483:
493:
420:
542:
524:
501:
456:
442:
408:
324:
86:
32:
258:
399:
395:
479:
391:
558:
538:
520:
497:
452:
438:
428:
404:
546:
528:
505:
487:
460:
446:
432:
412:
437:
No problem, take your time. Thankyou very much for taking this article on.--
424:
394:. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through
85:
in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the
83:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force
398:). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at
557:
Very nice article and thoroughly deserves to remain a GA.--
74:
43:
343:(lack of images does not in itself exclude GA)
8:
328:, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
296:Writing problems make it difficult to tell.
247:Writing problems make it difficult to tell.
81:This article has been reviewed as part of
7:
282:
272:
233:
223:
24:
380:
360:
346:
336:
312:
281:
271:
232:
222:
186:
172:
162:
119:
105:
169:(citations to reliable sources)
1:
547:19:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
529:22:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
506:02:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
488:02:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
461:22:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
447:10:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
433:09:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
413:09:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
381:
361:
347:
337:
313:
187:
173:
163:
120:
106:
577:
403:these concerns.) Regards--
492:For peacock prose, see
278:(all significant views)
95:reasonably well written
353:(non-free images have
333:(tagged and captioned)
18:Talk:Gilles Villeneuve
268:(fair representation)
259:neutral point of view
212:broad in its coverage
87:Good article criteria
478:discuss for now. --
355:fair use rationales
146:factually accurate
568:
384:
383:
364:
363:
350:
349:
340:
339:
316:
315:
285:
284:
275:
274:
236:
235:
226:
225:
190:
189:
176:
175:
166:
165:
123:
122:
109:
108:
79:
70:
51:
576:
575:
571:
570:
569:
567:
566:
565:
256:It follows the
219:(major aspects)
60:
37:
31:
29:
27:GA Reassessment
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
574:
572:
564:
563:
562:
561:
552:
551:
550:
549:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
388:
387:
386:
385:
367:
366:
365:
319:
318:
317:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
289:
288:
287:
286:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
240:
239:
238:
237:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
194:
193:
192:
191:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
127:
126:
125:
124:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
573:
560:
556:
555:
554:
553:
548:
544:
540:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
526:
522:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
422:
417:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
401:
397:
393:
378:
374:
373:
371:
368:
358:
356:
344:
334:
330:
329:
327:
326:
320:
311:
310:
308:
304:
303:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
279:
269:
265:
264:
262:
260:
255:
254:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
230:
220:
216:
215:
213:
209:
208:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
184:
182:
170:
160:
156:
155:
153:
152:
147:
143:
142:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
117:
115:
103:
99:
98:
96:
92:
91:
90:
88:
84:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
518:
392:Good article
389:
376:
369:
352:
342:
332:
322:
306:
277:
267:
257:
228:
218:
211:
178:
168:
159:(references)
158:
149:
145:
111:
101:
94:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
44:visual edit
494:WP:PEACOCK
480:Chaosdruid
421:WP:PEACOCK
151:verifiable
559:Jackyd101
539:Jackyd101
521:Jackyd101
498:Jackyd101
453:Jackyd101
439:Jackyd101
405:Jackyd101
377:Pass/Fail
323:contains
229:(focused)
135:problems.
370:Overall
102:(prose)
67:history
48:history
34:Article
400:WP:GAN
396:WP:GAR
325:images
307:stable
305:It is
261:policy
210:It is
144:It is
93:It is
76:Watch
16:<
543:talk
525:talk
502:talk
484:talk
457:talk
443:talk
429:talk
425:4u1e
409:talk
148:and
63:edit
40:edit
321:It
114:MoS
545:)
537:--
527:)
504:)
486:)
459:)
445:)
431:)
411:)
379::
375:a
372::
359::
351:c
345::
341:b
335::
331:a
309:.
280::
276:b
270::
266:a
263:.
231::
227:b
221::
217:a
214:.
185::
181:OR
177:c
171::
167:b
161::
157:a
154:.
118::
110:b
104::
100:a
97:.
65:|
46:|
42:|
541:(
523:(
500:(
482:(
455:(
441:(
427:(
407:(
357:)
183:)
179:(
116:)
112:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.