615:
588:
409:
1535:" and noting the change in focus from Cory in the first series to Riley in the second, spinoff looks more appropriate to me as to how to describe the relationship between the two shows. Casting doesn't matter that much, it is more about story focus. If the story continued to focus on Cory, I'd say sequel but the focus has substantially changed. It is not a continuation of the original story, it is telling a different one with some elements from the first being used.
718:
625:
399:
378:
730:
300:
504:
483:
1248:, not being stubborn and going back to your version. As I predicted, your line of thinking is that because you made a compromise edit it means that no other editor shall dare touch a single word of that edit because there's absolutely zero chance that more improvements can be made. (Hint: Improvements can always be made.) Sorry to break it to you, but that's not how it works. If anyone's showing
207:
290:
514:
269:
238:
808:
772:
1077:
which isn't correct. Unless
Knowledge has, like, its own definition of "to" that I'm unaware of. The only way to solve that would be to either have "...to January 21, 2017," but that probably wouldn't work, or "...through January 20, 2017," which might work, but I'm not sure if that's "acceptable," so to speak, wording for television series articles.
1783:
1253:
another editor here disagreed with you and move on with your life. And, actually, by technicality, two have disagreed with you now since this discussion was started. At least I'm willing to accept that what I prefer may not actually be and would be totally fine with what IJBall and
Geraldo have mentioned if that's where
1230:, I think you're taking this rather too far. Your original wording didn't work - accept it. Even after I made a compromise edit, you still had to change it - then accused ME of being stubborn. As you're so fond of hiding behind policy, perhaps you should refresh your memory regarding taking ownership of articles.
1362:
Genres can only come from sources. I'm assuming there must be some sourcing support for "coming of age" as it's in the lede. It might also be worth checking to see if the Disney P.R. ever used the word "family" (i.e. as is in something like "family comedy"), as they've used that term before IIRC. But
1150:
s first episode was shown on March 26, 2015, and then reran on April 6, 2015, what
Nickelodeon called the premiere, if I recall. Although I think even Nickelodeon had it labeled as a rerun since it didn't show up on Showbuzz Daily's ratings, and they only post the ratings for the original airings for
1097:
A simple statement "It aired on Disney
Channel from June 27, 2014, to January 20, 2017." is sufficient. I dislike the word "premiered" as that word has overloaded meanings that don't always match first aired and is a marketing term Disney uses sometimes for some airing other than the first. The comma
1076:
One complication I just thought of, though, is the use the word "to" in that form of wording. Both "to" and "until" mean "until, but not including," I'm pretty sure. So if we say "the series aired from June 27, 2014 to
January 20, 2017," we're saying the series ended on January 19, 2017, essentially,
1003:
on June 27, 2014, and ended on
January 20, 2017." Ended where? As you said, it's implied, but it just added extra clarity. However, like I said, I definitely see the repetitiveness now, and it's why I went for the wording I did so we don't need that same consistency. It also allows for a proper comma
1495:
It seems the sourcing we have in the article refers to it as both, which makes it one of those cases where it's one or the other. Spinoff would the correct terminology per my reasons that it's not all the same main cast, setting, etc., unless I happen to be looking at it from a very simplistic view.
844:
It can be described as a "sequel" if multiple reliable independent sources used the word "sequel" in describing it. I know there is sourcing describing it as a "spinoff", so its status as a spinoff is verified. But the sourcing will have to be checked to see if anyone (again, it should probably be
1252:
of articles, it's you. Your original intention was to simply remove repetition. Well, I hate to break it you again, but guess what? My edit did not reintroduce that repetition because after thinking it over, I agreed it was repetitive, it just changed the wording slightly. You need to accept that
1341:
The lead was better prior to the recent edits. The current wording is too, well, wordy and I'd support "from to ". Describing the show as simply a comedy is misleading and does not adequately summarize the article per guidelines. Additionally, regardless of any procedural violations by other
1386:
Four people here supported the change to "...aired on from to ": IJBall, Geraldo Perez, James
Allison, and myself. That's sufficient consensus, and so the wording has been updated. If there are any other issues with wording, a sub-discussion of this discussion can be made.
951:
is the most concise, though I would replace the word "until" with the word "to" – i.e. it should be something like "...aired from to ." (no comma) rather than "...aired from until ." You could also go with something like "...aired for three seasons from to ."
986:
Yeah, definitely agree now that stating it twice is unnecessary after thinking it over earlier this month, which is why I've worded it the way I did and why I left that alone and didn't return it to the original wording from before
January. When I mentioned
917:, regarding it being unnecessary to mention Disney Channel twice (unless the show had actually moved to another network, which would also need to be stated if that happened, it's implied that it stayed on the network it started on). But when you made this
925:, while not perfect, it eliminated the double mention of the network and to me was satisfactory. When Smurfmeister decided to revert your edit, I think that's the point it has gone too far, especially with them not deciding to discuss the change on a
1597:'s comment. Even the stories that do focus on Cory and/or Topanga generally tend to revolve around Riley, or they're just very minor B-stories that take up little substance in the episode. Agree with the above comments that
153:
1182:
when simple wording is sufficient. When I see something "premiered" I expect red carpet, celebrities formally dressed, and a party afterwards, none of which I will be invited to. A bit pretentious otherwise.
743:
598:
1299:
needed to discuss at that point. If your proposed wording actually was an improvement, that would be shown in the subsequent discussion – you shouldn't just assume that it's "better" once reverted. --
833:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
797:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
1874:
1119:
That's another fair point. In the case of "premieres," I can understand why you find them problematic because they'll often have what they call sneak peeks/previews. I think in cases like
1098:
after the first year is an iffy MOS thing right now and should not be needed for a date range as "June 27, 2014 – January 20, 2017" is correct as well and means exactly the same thing.
655:
1244:
It doesn't matter what you thought, what matters is how you responded. The very first time you were reverted, you should have been here discussing the matter like we are now per
1468:
are Ben Savage and
Danielle Fishel. Aside from them, the main cast is completely different. Like I said, a sequel would involve all of the same cast, by which I mean main cast.
1884:
748:
1688:
1839:
672:
147:
1127:
film and also not on its regular day. December 2, 2011, was essentially the premiere, it was just called a preview for marketing purposes, I think, per what someone said
198:
1889:
1031:
Something like that would work, too, I suppose. Since the year is considered separate, I would still prefer to have it worded in a way that the comma can be used,
1869:
1758:
991:
in edit summary, with the consistent part, I was referring to the Disney
Channel portion. It's consistent that if we word it as such and state "...that premiered
708:
698:
1879:
1894:
1819:
662:
360:
350:
79:
1123:, Disney Channel stating "preview" for December 2, 2011, and "premiere" for December 4, 2011, was just to attract viewers since it was airing after the
1824:
667:
44:
1864:
1854:
1834:
1668:
Pointless, they are linked from the infobox and character list in the main article and those articles link back to the main article in the intro.
570:
560:
465:
455:
1277:
I think language like 'mindlessly reverting' says it all. You talk about accepting things and moving on, but seem unprepared to do so yourself.
1128:
322:
85:
1859:
1844:
1814:
1766:
826:
790:
326:
933:). I was even tempted to revert Smurfmeister's revert, and may do so if they continue to make reverts on this trivial matter of wording.
1646:
1352:
1291:
He is however correct that once reverted you needed to discuss the matter. You made the first change, and then were reverted, so as per
818:
638:
593:
830:
794:
650:
1722:(Technically, both should be transcluded at this point, as they both contain the links. There is no valid reason not to transclude
1650:
782:
536:
431:
1849:
1829:
313:
274:
430:
and its affiliated companies on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
194:
190:
168:
99:
30:
1203:. But for any show that has a beginning and an end date, "...aired from to " is the better way to handle this in the lede. --
1197:
I think "premiered" is fine as a word to use in the lede for any TV show that doesn't have an "end date" – e.g. the lede for
135:
104:
20:
999:
on January 20, 2017." You can see what I'm referring to when I'm talking about consistency, compared to "...that premiered
646:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
74:
1579:
1506:
1478:
1397:
1369:
1305:
1267:
1209:
1161:
1087:
1059:
1014:
958:
898:
855:
527:
488:
422:
383:
249:
65:
874:
The wording of the lead needs to be discussed here. Editors who are bold and then reverted are expected to actually
1553:
as a "sequel" – to my recollection, the vast majority referred to it as a "spinoff"... FTR, I really dislike these
206:
185:
1549:
I recall looking into this before, and I was surprised at how few reliable secondary sources actually referred to
129:
1609:
217:
1770:
1740:
1726:
1709:
1695:
1639:
1041:, like I mentioned, is actually where I got the idea to word the lead like that here and elsewhere, though I
125:
1673:
1540:
1444:
1188:
1103:
427:
109:
1428:
1282:
1235:
1035:
I would be fine with that if that's what the consensus comes to. The current wording of the lead over on
1791:
255:
175:
1602:
938:
630:
237:
1735:
1704:
1254:
885:
161:
55:
535:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1669:
1658:
1594:
1536:
1490:
1455:
1440:
1347:
1257:
goes, because they're actually discussing it instead of mindlessly reverting like you have been.
1184:
1114:
1099:
974:
222:
70:
614:
587:
1522:
1420:
1278:
1231:
1179:
1049:, premiering on June 27, 2014, and ending on January 20, 2017" here as opposed to what I did.
910:
735:
408:
305:
141:
51:
1598:
1583:
1532:
1502:
1474:
1393:
1373:
1309:
1263:
1213:
1157:
1083:
1055:
1010:
962:
894:
859:
814:
778:
219:
24:
1419:
All of The cast from Boy Meets World appear in Girl Meets Word, just not in every episode.
1342:
editors, it seems clear to me from the edit history and commentary that Amaury is editing
981:
934:
318:
1573:. Because editor disagreements over which of these parameters to use keep coming up... --
884:
rather than continue to be disruptive. Honestly, this article should be returned to the
717:
1808:
1732:
at this stage. Once the TfD is concluded, I guess the situation will be resolved.)
1654:
1343:
1292:
1249:
1245:
930:
881:
643:
519:
414:
729:
398:
377:
299:
1687:. At least for as long as the navbox exists anyway. However, if it is deleted (
1795:
1574:
1518:
1497:
1469:
1414:
1388:
1364:
1300:
1258:
1225:
1204:
1199:
1173:
1152:
1078:
1071:
1050:
1026:
1005:
953:
922:
889:
850:
321:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
1653:. I believe that it should be listed there, as it is a link in the navbox. --
1178:"Premiered" also has connotation of a major event and is a bit of unnecessary
1037:
725:
620:
509:
404:
295:
503:
482:
221:
1004:
addition without visual awkwardness since the year is considered separate.
642:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1799:
1774:
1746:
1715:
1677:
1662:
1616:
1588:
1544:
1511:
1483:
1448:
1432:
1402:
1378:
1357:
1314:
1286:
1272:
1239:
1218:
1192:
1166:
1107:
1092:
1064:
1019:
967:
942:
903:
864:
807:
771:
317:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about
1701:
should be transcluded, as this includes a duplicate of the same links.
513:
1363:
I'm willing to bet there is no sourcing support for any other genre. --
289:
268:
1631:
Should "Template:Girl Meets World" be on episode and character lists?
1528:
532:
1601:
would be more appropriate and fitting than calling it a sequel.
1561:
infobox parameter issues – I'd be happy if they just eliminated
1131:. But I think the same could be said for any show, really, like
1460:
Guest stars don't count. The only actors who were main cast on
1045:
originally planning on having "...that aired on Disney Channel
802:
766:
231:
223:
15:
716:
948:
918:
914:
822:
786:
160:
929:(not just an edit summary, which is insufficient per
531:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
426:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
888:on December 24, 2017, while this is figured out.
849:"someones") described it as a "sequel" series. --
1875:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1569:as possibilities from the infobox, leaving just
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
325:. To improve this article, please refer to the
1759:Category:Television shows set in New York City
1753:Category:Television shows set in New York City
995:on June 27, 2014," we also have "...and ended
174:
8:
1885:Low-importance American television articles
989:...it still adds clarity and is consistent.
909:The only thing I honestly agree with from
582:
477:
372:
263:
1840:C-Class Disney articles of Mid-importance
1890:American television task force articles
584:
479:
374:
265:
235:
988:
1870:Low-importance United States articles
7:
1880:C-Class American television articles
1612:May the odds be ever in your favor ♥
636:This article is within the scope of
525:This article is within the scope of
420:This article is within the scope of
311:This article is within the scope of
1647:List of Girl Meets World characters
819:List of Girl Meets World characters
683:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
254:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1895:WikiProject United States articles
1820:Low-importance television articles
1439:What do reliable sources call it?
686:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1651:List of Girl Meets World episodes
783:List of Girl Meets World episodes
1781:
806:
770:
728:
623:
613:
586:
512:
502:
481:
407:
397:
376:
335:Knowledge:WikiProject Television
298:
288:
267:
236:
205:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1825:WikiProject Television articles
703:This article has been rated as
565:This article has been rated as
460:This article has been rated as
355:This article has been rated as
338:Template:WikiProject Television
1865:C-Class United States articles
1855:Low-importance Comedy articles
1835:Mid-importance Disney articles
744:American television task force
1:
865:16:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
741:This article is supported by
539:and see a list of open tasks.
434:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
545:Knowledge:WikiProject Comedy
440:Knowledge:WikiProject Disney
1860:WikiProject Comedy articles
1845:WikiProject Disney articles
1815:C-Class television articles
1593:I would have to agree with
1403:21:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
1379:22:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
1358:21:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
1315:23:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1287:22:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1273:22:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1240:21:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1219:20:26, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1193:20:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1167:19:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1108:19:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1093:19:25, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1065:18:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1020:18:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
968:18:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
943:18:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
904:17:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
548:Template:WikiProject Comedy
443:Template:WikiProject Disney
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1911:
1747:14:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
1716:14:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
1678:21:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
1663:14:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
1645:was recently removed from
709:project's importance scale
571:project's importance scale
466:project's importance scale
361:project's importance scale
1617:16:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
1589:13:51, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
1545:06:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
1512:06:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
1484:06:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
1449:06:13, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
1433:06:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
1151:cable shows, not reruns.
913:is in their edit summary
724:
702:
639:WikiProject United States
608:
564:
497:
459:
392:
354:
283:
262:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1800:21:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
1775:21:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
644:United States of America
1850:C-Class Comedy articles
1830:C-Class Disney articles
1689:which seems very likely
428:The Walt Disney Company
721:
689:United States articles
314:WikiProject Television
244:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1464:who are main cast on
720:
329:for the type of work.
199:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1757:I would like to add
1527:Comparing articles "
1143:, etc. For example,
825:. The former page's
789:. The former page's
631:United States portal
105:No original research
831:provide attribution
795:provide attribution
657:Articles Requested!
341:television articles
323:join the discussion
319:television programs
840:Sequel vs. spinoff
722:
528:WikiProject Comedy
423:WikiProject Disney
250:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1587:
1509:
1481:
1459:
1400:
1377:
1313:
1270:
1217:
1164:
1125:Good Luck Charlie
1121:Austin & Ally
1090:
1062:
1047:for three seasons
1017:
1001:on Disney Channel
997:on Disney Channel
993:on Disney Channel
978:
966:
921:as a compromise,
901:
863:
837:
836:
801:
800:
763:
762:
759:
758:
755:
754:
736:Television portal
581:
580:
577:
576:
476:
475:
472:
471:
371:
370:
367:
366:
306:Television portal
230:
229:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1902:
1789:
1785:
1784:
1743:
1738:
1731:
1725:
1712:
1707:
1700:
1694:
1644:
1640:Girl Meets World
1638:
1614:
1607:
1577:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1526:
1501:
1494:
1473:
1466:Girl Meets World
1453:
1425:
1418:
1392:
1367:
1303:
1262:
1229:
1207:
1177:
1156:
1149:
1118:
1082:
1075:
1054:
1030:
1009:
985:
972:
956:
893:
853:
815:Girl Meets World
810:
803:
779:Girl Meets World
774:
767:
738:
733:
732:
691:
690:
687:
684:
681:
633:
628:
627:
626:
617:
610:
609:
604:
601:
590:
583:
553:
552:
549:
546:
543:
522:
517:
516:
506:
499:
498:
493:
485:
478:
448:
447:
444:
441:
438:
417:
412:
411:
401:
394:
393:
388:
380:
373:
343:
342:
339:
336:
333:
327:style guidelines
308:
303:
302:
292:
285:
284:
279:
271:
264:
247:
241:
240:
232:
224:
210:
209:
200:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
25:Girl Meets World
16:
1910:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1805:
1804:
1782:
1780:
1755:
1741:
1736:
1729:
1727:Boy Meets World
1723:
1710:
1705:
1698:
1696:Boy Meets World
1692:
1642:
1636:
1633:
1610:
1603:
1516:
1488:
1462:Boy Meets World
1421:
1412:
1410:
1355:
1223:
1171:
1147:
1112:
1069:
1024:
979:
880:the matter per
872:
842:
734:
727:
688:
685:
682:
679:
678:
677:
663:Become a Member
629:
624:
622:
602:
596:
551:Comedy articles
550:
547:
544:
541:
540:
518:
511:
491:
446:Disney articles
445:
442:
439:
436:
435:
413:
406:
386:
340:
337:
334:
331:
330:
304:
297:
277:
248:on Knowledge's
245:
226:
225:
220:
197:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1908:
1906:
1898:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1842:
1837:
1832:
1827:
1822:
1817:
1807:
1806:
1803:
1802:
1792:WP:NOTDEFINING
1767:86.131.222.121
1754:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1719:
1718:
1681:
1680:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1451:
1409:
1406:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1351:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1022:
945:
931:WP:BRD#Discuss
871:
868:
841:
838:
835:
834:
829:now serves to
813:Material from
811:
799:
798:
793:now serves to
787:April 17, 2015
777:Material from
775:
761:
760:
757:
756:
753:
752:
749:Low-importance
740:
739:
723:
713:
712:
705:Low-importance
701:
695:
694:
692:
676:
675:
670:
665:
660:
653:
651:Template Usage
647:
635:
634:
618:
606:
605:
603:Low‑importance
591:
579:
578:
575:
574:
567:Low-importance
563:
557:
556:
554:
537:the discussion
524:
523:
507:
495:
494:
492:Low‑importance
486:
474:
473:
470:
469:
462:Mid-importance
458:
452:
451:
449:
432:the discussion
419:
418:
402:
390:
389:
387:Mid‑importance
381:
369:
368:
365:
364:
357:Low-importance
353:
347:
346:
344:
310:
309:
293:
281:
280:
278:Low‑importance
272:
260:
259:
253:
242:
228:
227:
218:
216:
215:
212:
211:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1907:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1833:
1831:
1828:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1812:
1810:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1788:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1739:
1728:
1721:
1720:
1717:
1714:
1713:
1708:
1697:
1690:
1686:
1683:
1682:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1670:Geraldo Perez
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1641:
1630:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1608:
1606:
1600:
1596:
1595:Geraldo Perez
1592:
1591:
1590:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1552:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1537:Geraldo Perez
1534:
1530:
1524:
1520:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1508:
1504:
1499:
1492:
1491:Geraldo Perez
1487:
1486:
1485:
1480:
1476:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1457:
1456:edit conflict
1452:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1441:Geraldo Perez
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:SportsFan007
1434:
1430:
1426:
1424:
1416:
1407:
1405:
1404:
1399:
1395:
1390:
1380:
1375:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1345:
1340:
1339:
1316:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1269:
1265:
1260:
1256:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1227:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1215:
1211:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1185:Geraldo Perez
1181:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1163:
1159:
1154:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:Hunter Street
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1116:
1115:Geraldo Perez
1111:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1100:Geraldo Perez
1096:
1095:
1094:
1089:
1085:
1080:
1073:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1034:
1028:
1023:
1021:
1016:
1012:
1007:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
983:
976:
975:edit conflict
971:
970:
969:
964:
960:
955:
950:
947:FTR, I think
946:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
907:
906:
905:
900:
896:
891:
887:
883:
879:
878:
869:
867:
866:
861:
857:
852:
848:
847:more than one
839:
832:
828:
824:
823:April 2, 2016
820:
817:was split to
816:
812:
809:
805:
804:
796:
792:
788:
784:
781:was split to
780:
776:
773:
769:
768:
765:
750:
747:(assessed as
746:
745:
737:
731:
726:
719:
715:
714:
710:
706:
700:
697:
696:
693:
680:United States
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
658:
654:
652:
649:
648:
645:
641:
640:
632:
621:
619:
616:
612:
611:
607:
600:
595:
594:United States
592:
589:
585:
572:
568:
562:
559:
558:
555:
538:
534:
530:
529:
521:
520:Comedy portal
515:
510:
508:
505:
501:
500:
496:
490:
487:
484:
480:
467:
463:
457:
454:
453:
450:
433:
429:
425:
424:
416:
415:Disney portal
410:
405:
403:
400:
396:
395:
391:
385:
382:
379:
375:
362:
358:
352:
349:
348:
345:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:
307:
301:
296:
294:
291:
287:
286:
282:
276:
273:
270:
266:
261:
257:
251:
243:
239:
234:
233:
214:
213:
208:
204:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1786:
1762:
1756:
1733:
1702:
1684:
1634:
1611:
1604:
1550:
1523:SportsFan007
1465:
1461:
1423:SportsFan007
1422:
1411:
1385:
1296:
1279:Smurfmeister
1255:WP:CONSENSUS
1232:Smurfmeister
1198:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:I Am Frankie
1132:
1124:
1120:
1046:
1042:
1036:
1032:
1000:
996:
992:
949:this wording
926:
911:Smurfmeister
886:WP:STATUSQUO
876:
875:
873:
870:Lead wording
846:
843:
764:
742:
704:
668:Project Talk
656:
637:
566:
526:
461:
421:
356:
312:
256:WikiProjects
202:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1567:followed_by
1563:preceded_by
1555:preceded_by
1344:WP:OWNishly
1200:Bizaardvark
1145:Make It Pop
1141:Make It Pop
148:free images
31:not a forum
1809:Categories
1763:Categories
1571:related_to
1559:related_to
1180:WP:PUFFERY
1038:Mighty Med
982:MPFitz1968
935:MPFitz1968
599:Television
332:Television
275:Television
1765:section.
1635:Template
1496:I dunno.
1250:ownership
927:talk page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1787:Not done
1742:superman
1711:superman
1691:), then
1655:Jax 0677
1599:spin-off
1580:contribs
1533:spin-off
1507:contribs
1479:contribs
1398:contribs
1370:contribs
1353:contribs
1306:contribs
1268:contribs
1210:contribs
1162:contribs
1088:contribs
1060:contribs
1015:contribs
959:contribs
899:contribs
856:contribs
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1761:in the
1605:Katniss
1531:" and "
877:discuss
827:history
791:history
707:on the
569:on the
464:on the
359:on the
246:C-class
203:60 days
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1796:Amaury
1737:wooden
1706:wooden
1575:IJBall
1529:sequel
1519:Amaury
1498:Amaury
1470:Amaury
1415:Amaury
1408:Sequel
1389:Amaury
1365:IJBall
1301:IJBall
1293:WP:BRD
1259:Amaury
1246:WP:BRD
1226:Amaury
1205:IJBall
1174:Amaury
1153:Amaury
1079:Amaury
1072:IJBall
1051:Amaury
1027:IJBall
1006:Amaury
954:IJBall
923:Amaury
890:Amaury
882:WP:BRD
851:IJBall
673:Alerts
542:Comedy
533:comedy
489:Comedy
437:Disney
384:Disney
252:scale.
126:Google
1348:James
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1771:talk
1674:talk
1659:talk
1649:and
1584:talk
1565:and
1557:vs.
1541:talk
1521:and
1503:talk
1475:talk
1445:talk
1429:talk
1394:talk
1374:talk
1310:talk
1283:talk
1264:talk
1236:talk
1214:talk
1189:talk
1158:talk
1129:here
1104:talk
1084:talk
1056:talk
1011:talk
963:talk
939:talk
919:edit
915:here
895:talk
860:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1685:Yes
1551:GMW
1297:you
1043:was
1033:but
821:on
785:on
699:Low
561:Low
456:Mid
351:Low
176:TWL
1811::
1798:•
1794:.
1790::
1773:)
1734:--
1730:}}
1724:{{
1703:--
1699:}}
1693:{{
1676:)
1661:)
1643:}}
1637:{{
1582:•
1543:)
1510:)
1505:|
1482:)
1477:|
1447:)
1431:)
1401:)
1396:|
1372:•
1356:)
1350:(/
1346:.
1308:•
1295:,
1285:)
1271:)
1266:|
1238:)
1212:•
1191:)
1165:)
1160:|
1139:,
1135:,
1106:)
1091:)
1086:|
1063:)
1058:|
1018:)
1013:|
961:•
952:--
941:)
902:)
897:|
858:•
751:).
597::
201::
193:,
156:)
54:;
1769:(
1672:(
1657:(
1586:)
1578:(
1539:(
1525::
1517:@
1500:(
1493::
1489:@
1472:(
1458:)
1454:(
1443:(
1427:(
1417::
1413:@
1391:(
1376:)
1368:(
1312:)
1304:(
1281:(
1261:(
1234:(
1228::
1224:@
1216:)
1208:(
1187:(
1176::
1172:@
1155:(
1148:'
1117::
1113:@
1102:(
1081:(
1074::
1070:@
1053:(
1029::
1025:@
1008:(
984::
980:@
977:)
973:(
965:)
957:(
937:(
892:(
862:)
854:(
711:.
573:.
468:.
363:.
258::
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
