707:. "Parties and Elections in Europe provides a comprehensive database about political parties, elections and governments in all European countries. The website contains the results of parliamentary elections from more than 100 countries and autonomous regions in Europe. The parties are classified according to their political orientation. Historical data can be found in the archive." I will restore long-standing and you get some consensus to remove or to call source not reliable.
383:
356:
393:
587:
562:
516:
491:
272:
251:
220:
282:
459:
1034:
that directly supports the content. But the content had a citation to a home-made website - a self-published source - which is not a reliable source. The stated problem with the sourcing - it's self-published, by an unknown person who is not an expert, and is therefore not reliable - must be fixed
749:
If the EU commission recognize and listed that, that is pretty notable. And I don't think so to you have any argument. Maybe you just don't like something, but then make a blog. You changed long-standing version and you will have to explain and get consensus about otherwise it will be restored.
1142:
That link is a sub-page created almost entirely by one person. It is not
Knowledge (XXG) policy, and few editors have even seen it. Your claim does not stand up to scrutiny. The actual policy of Knowledge (XXG), agreed to by the entire community, goes against the use of such a source.
975:", but as you evidently have no understanding of what that term means, no-one's going to pay much attention. As this is a self-published source, you would need to establish that we should make an exception to the site-wide consensus against the use of SPS.
764:
If you restore it you will be reverted, because we don't use self-published sources. Just because they have - unfortunately - been on the site before, is not a reason to avoid the policy on poor quality sources. You need to familiarise yourself with the
952:
For example, for me, to that be listed on the EC Library Guide is notable. And they for sure won't list there some biased, pov or really low quality sources. As I said, not the best maybe but it is not a primary source and it is widely used. So start
1058:
1st problem is to that source is widely used here, long-standing, and cited also, so in your opinion is not good enough, I say it is ok. So you are making your own personal judgment and that is for personal blog not for
Knowledge (XXG).
153:
910:
if you have some problem, to get consensus, or to restore content that you removed. Maybe not the best, but pretty widely used source. So trust me, it is better like that, or your actions will be just removal of sourced content.
723:
721:
The presence of a link to the website on one EU site does not render a self-published source reliable. Self-published sources are not used. Nordsieck has no recognised expertise. He self-published a book through a
1124:
1087:
websites are not reliable sources. Not my personal opinion; it's a fact. Your opinion is that we should make an exception to that policy because you like the source and because you claim it's
147:
929:
in the encyclopaedia project, then seek wider input that agrees with your view. That's unlikely in the extreme. Some guy's home-made website is not a reputable publisher, hence the policy on
44:
1127:
so seems to you are only one who have something against that source for now. And as I said this is not a personal blog. Or you get consensus about that source or you are doing vandalism.
971:
The question is about reliability, not notability. A mention on one website does not establish reliability. Nor does it establish notability. You can try to label my edits as "
994:
You did removal of long-standing sources, I reverted and then you need to make arguments about what and why. Only what I see is that you are removing sources. You should make
468:
366:
338:
1233:
473:
190:
1208:
957:
discussion or you doing just removal of sourced content. And for removal of sourced content you can easily be revered and your actions can be labeled as vandalism.
328:
1238:
1228:
925:
If you think an exception ought to be made to the site-wide consensus that source material should come from a reputable publisher, an idea that was established
79:
1213:
1203:
449:
304:
1163:
The source is self-published, but it is one of the most knowledgeable and complete comparative source on political parties in Europe. It is worth using. --
852:
and there was already talk about that website. I thought to you checked that. Or start a new one and get consensus, or restore sources what you removed.
1223:
439:
168:
593:
567:
85:
135:
522:
496:
295:
256:
1243:
1218:
415:
30:
637:
The self-published website of "Wolfram
Nordsieck", an unknown person with no recognised expertise in any topic, is not a reliable source.
129:
99:
24:
998:
if you have some problem. Your personal labeling that something is reliable or not is not enough as this is not your personal blog.
887:? We're not going to restore unreliable sources published by unknown nobodies, they're not a useful addition to the encyclopaedia.
406:
361:
104:
20:
125:
684:
by non-experts because they are not a reliable source. Is
English a second language? Your sentence does not entirely make sense.
74:
231:
175:
65:
1151:
1099:
1043:
983:
941:
895:
822:
785:
777:
guidelines before you continue editing inappropriately. Don't speculate on other editor's motives. Indent your posts.
738:
692:
645:
185:
141:
1080:
109:
199:
237:
219:
704:
1183:
598:
572:
527:
501:
1145:
1093:
1037:
977:
935:
889:
867:
There is no agreement that it's a reliable source in a brief discussion from fourteen years ago. As admin
816:
779:
732:
686:
639:
1076:
1027:
55:
414:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
303:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
287:
70:
1172:
1157:
1136:
1105:
1068:
1049:
1021:
1007:
989:
966:
947:
920:
901:
861:
828:
805:
791:
759:
744:
716:
698:
672:
651:
161:
204:
1132:
1064:
1017:
1003:
962:
916:
857:
801:
755:
712:
668:
51:
995:
954:
907:
849:
770:
1168:
201:
1084:
930:
884:
874:
811:
796:
You have to get some consenus about your claims. I don't see any problem with that source.
774:
681:
658:
398:
1031:
766:
203:
300:
392:
382:
355:
1197:
1128:
1060:
1013:
999:
958:
912:
853:
797:
751:
727:
708:
664:
1164:
586:
561:
515:
490:
868:
388:
277:
271:
250:
705:
https://ec-europa-eu.libguides.com/european-elections/statistics-and-data
411:
730:, Books on Demand. That it's been used on pages before is irrelevant.
1125:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
Elections and Referendums/Useful sources
1123:
People use that source, and editors here at wikipedia for example:
458:
657:
Seems ok totally and noone had problem with that source to I saw.
213:
205:
15:
457:
1182:: An editor has expressed a concern that editors have been
1012:
Or to invite more editors to this talk page maybe first?
299:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1187:
926:
659:
http://www.parties-and-elections.eu/referenceguide.html
160:
410:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
1030:. If it was sourced it would have a citation to a
596:, a project which is currently considered to be
525:, a project which is currently considered to be
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
8:
608:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pirate Politics
217:
556:
537:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Green Politics
485:
350:
313:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject European Union
245:
1234:High-importance political party articles
558:
487:
352:
247:
1209:Mid-importance European Union articles
1088:
972:
880:
872:
1239:Political parties task force articles
883:. Do you understand the policy about
877:, run by a lawyer...i.e. a non-expert
7:
1229:Start-Class political party articles
611:Template:WikiProject Pirate Politics
592:This article is within the scope of
521:This article is within the scope of
424:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics
404:This article is within the scope of
293:This article is within the scope of
1214:WikiProject European Union articles
1204:Start-Class European Union articles
1035:before the material is added back.
810:Do you understand the policy about
540:Template:WikiProject Green Politics
316:Template:WikiProject European Union
236:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
906:So it seems to you have to start
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1224:Mid-importance politics articles
585:
560:
514:
489:
391:
381:
354:
280:
270:
249:
218:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
444:This article has been rated as
333:This article has been rated as
1:
1244:WikiProject Politics articles
1219:Start-Class politics articles
466:This article is supported by
427:Template:WikiProject Politics
418:and see a list of open tasks.
307:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
25:Greens–European Free Alliance
1091:. Neither is a good reason.
881:no indication it meets WP:RS
469:Political parties task force
594:WikiProject Pirate Politics
1260:
1173:13:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
523:WikiProject Green Politics
450:project's importance scale
339:project's importance scale
296:WikiProject European Union
1158:02:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1137:02:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1106:02:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1069:02:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1050:02:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1022:02:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1008:02:12, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
990:02:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
967:02:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
948:01:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
921:01:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
902:01:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
862:01:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
829:01:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
806:01:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
792:01:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
760:00:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
745:00:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
717:00:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
699:00:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
673:00:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
652:00:33, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
580:
509:
465:
443:
376:
332:
265:
244:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1079:, as established at the
614:Pirate Politics articles
543:Green Politics articles
319:European Union articles
885:self-published sources
812:self-published sources
682:self-published sources
462:
226:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1186:to this discussion. (
633:Parties-and-elections
461:
288:European Union portal
230:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
407:WikiProject Politics
105:No original research
1077:site-wide consensus
463:
232:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1191:
1075:I'm applying the
1028:unsourced content
871:points out, it's
630:
629:
626:
625:
622:
621:
555:
554:
551:
550:
484:
483:
480:
479:
430:politics articles
367:Political parties
349:
348:
345:
344:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1251:
1177:
1156:
1104:
1081:WP:Verifiability
1048:
988:
946:
900:
827:
790:
743:
697:
650:
616:
615:
612:
609:
606:
589:
582:
581:
576:
564:
557:
545:
544:
541:
538:
535:
518:
511:
510:
505:
493:
486:
432:
431:
428:
425:
422:
401:
396:
395:
385:
378:
377:
372:
369:
358:
351:
321:
320:
317:
314:
311:
290:
285:
284:
283:
274:
267:
266:
261:
253:
246:
229:
223:
222:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1259:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1194:
1193:
1144:
1092:
1036:
1032:reliable source
976:
934:
888:
815:
778:
767:reliable source
731:
726:and well-known
685:
638:
635:
613:
610:
607:
605:Pirate Politics
604:
603:
570:
568:Pirate Politics
542:
539:
536:
533:
532:
499:
474:High-importance
429:
426:
423:
420:
419:
399:Politics portal
397:
390:
370:
364:
318:
315:
312:
309:
308:
286:
281:
279:
259:
227:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1257:
1255:
1247:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1196:
1195:
1161:
1160:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1085:self-published
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1010:
879:. He too sees
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
662:
661:
634:
631:
628:
627:
624:
623:
620:
619:
617:
590:
578:
577:
565:
553:
552:
549:
548:
546:
534:Green Politics
519:
507:
506:
497:Green Politics
494:
482:
481:
478:
477:
464:
454:
453:
446:Mid-importance
442:
436:
435:
433:
416:the discussion
403:
402:
386:
374:
373:
371:Mid‑importance
359:
347:
346:
343:
342:
335:Mid-importance
331:
325:
324:
322:
310:European Union
305:the discussion
301:European Union
292:
291:
275:
263:
262:
260:Mid‑importance
257:European Union
254:
242:
241:
235:
224:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1256:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1199:
1192:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1149:
1148:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1097:
1096:
1090:
1086:
1083:policy, that
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1057:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1041:
1040:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
992:
991:
987:
986:
981:
980:
974:
970:
969:
968:
964:
960:
956:
951:
950:
949:
945:
944:
939:
938:
932:
928:
927:very early on
924:
923:
922:
918:
914:
909:
905:
904:
903:
899:
898:
893:
892:
886:
882:
878:
876:
870:
866:
865:
864:
863:
859:
855:
851:
830:
826:
825:
820:
819:
813:
809:
808:
807:
803:
799:
795:
794:
793:
789:
788:
783:
782:
776:
772:
768:
763:
762:
761:
757:
753:
748:
747:
746:
742:
741:
736:
735:
729:
725:
720:
719:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
701:
700:
696:
695:
690:
689:
683:
680:We don't use
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
660:
656:
655:
654:
653:
649:
648:
643:
642:
632:
618:
601:
600:
595:
591:
588:
584:
583:
579:
574:
569:
566:
563:
559:
547:
530:
529:
524:
520:
517:
513:
512:
508:
503:
498:
495:
492:
488:
475:
472:(assessed as
471:
470:
460:
456:
455:
451:
447:
441:
438:
437:
434:
417:
413:
409:
408:
400:
394:
389:
387:
384:
380:
379:
375:
368:
363:
360:
357:
353:
340:
336:
330:
327:
326:
323:
306:
302:
298:
297:
289:
278:
276:
273:
269:
268:
264:
258:
255:
252:
248:
243:
239:
233:
225:
221:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1179:
1176:
1162:
1152:
1146:
1122:
1100:
1094:
1089:longstanding
1044:
1038:
984:
978:
942:
936:
896:
890:
847:
823:
817:
786:
780:
739:
733:
728:vanity press
693:
687:
663:
646:
640:
636:
597:
526:
467:
445:
405:
334:
294:
238:WikiProjects
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
228:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
1198:Categories
1026:I removed
724:recognised
703:Here also
1184:canvassed
973:vandalism
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1147:Cambial
1095:Cambial
1039:Cambial
979:Cambial
937:Cambial
891:Cambial
818:Cambial
781:Cambial
775:civility
734:Cambial
688:Cambial
641:Cambial
599:inactive
573:inactive
528:inactive
502:inactive
421:Politics
412:politics
362:Politics
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1153:foliar❧
1129:Nubia86
1101:foliar❧
1061:Nubia86
1045:foliar❧
1014:Nubia86
1000:Nubia86
996:WP:RS/N
985:foliar❧
959:Nubia86
955:WP:RS/N
943:foliar❧
913:Nubia86
908:WP:RS/N
897:foliar❧
854:Nubia86
850:WP:RS/N
824:foliar❧
798:Nubia86
787:foliar❧
771:WP:NPOV
752:Nubia86
740:foliar❧
709:Nubia86
694:foliar❧
665:Nubia86
647:foliar❧
448:on the
337:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1165:Checco
931:WP:SPS
875:WP:SPS
848:Check
234:scale.
126:Google
869:Jayjg
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1188:diff
1180:Note
1169:talk
1133:talk
1065:talk
1018:talk
1004:talk
963:talk
917:talk
858:talk
802:talk
773:and
756:talk
713:talk
669:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
440:Mid
329:Mid
176:TWL
1200::
1178:—
1171:)
1150:—
1135:)
1098:—
1067:)
1042:—
1020:)
1006:)
982:—
965:)
940:—
933:.
919:)
894:—
873:a
860:)
821:—
814:?
804:)
784:—
769:,
758:)
737:—
715:)
691:—
671:)
644:—
476:).
365::
156:)
54:;
1190:)
1167:(
1131:(
1063:(
1016:(
1002:(
961:(
915:(
856:(
800:(
754:(
711:(
667:(
602:.
575:)
571:(
531:.
504:)
500:(
452:.
341:.
240::
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
