1840:
pages half way through an RM. What were you thinking? Then after the RM, after a fair consensus had arisen to move "Parkville (CDOT station)" to "Parkville station (CTfastrak)", you move the page to a different qualifier. What was wrong with the agreed-upon title? Why do you suppose the consensus in the RM did not include "Connecticut" as the disambiguator rather than "CTfastrak"? It appears that without discussing this with involved editors, you have gone against consensus. These are just thoughts to consider. I consider the point moot and my questions rhetorical. In this particular case, I'd say it all worked out to the benefit of
Knowledge. It may be well to remember though that sometimes when these things happen, the "controversial" aspects can be like Vodka; they'll run around behind you and bite you on the arse. Wouldn't want that to happen to any editor
387:
366:
282:
261:
292:
569:
542:
496:
471:
689:
230:
1865:
there was nothing wrong with the previous title. That's something I will remember for next time. Now, do you want me to self-revert that move?And regarding being a hypocrite: my move of the
Flatbush Avenue station article was reverted after I moved it back to the original "(CDOT station)" title. I asked why it was moved, and I was told to "Be bold and move some". So that is what I did.
397:
201:
1686:
583:
1803:
participated and should have a say in what happens. If not an RM, then there should at least be informal functional conversation among involved editors here on this talk page (or the talk page of a specific station in this group of pages) where it, of course, belongs. Why would anyone want to exclude involved editors?
1802:
I don't think such a thing is "controversial" per se. What is controversial is the way this RM swayed in different directions and didn't really get a chance to run but about half its course before a procedural close. All I'm saying is that this is no longer a Lone Ranger situation. Other editors have
2105:
I have no strong feeling either way, but will note that
Parkville is a defunct railroad station in addition to a current bus station ; on the other hand, a new "CTfastrak East (of the CT River)" is proposed, and those stations will have no railroad history. Should CTfastrak East be built, Parkville
1703:
I don't have any problem with the final naming scheme, but so many stations were added or removed and added back to the proposed list, and premature moves made and reverted and unreverted that I would have preferred the dust to have settled a bit more to better ensure the technical process of moving
1600:
To quote another editor, "Don't do that"Â ;-). I edited
Flatbush inadvertently because I was working through the list of Hartford Line stations and forgot West Hartford was also a bus station. I posted the note when I realized the mistake. It is not that the moves are controversial, but I started the
1839:
I really don't see where you're coming from; however, I shall continue to AGF. I must ask, though, how you can respond to an editor "Don't do that. It confuses people if you move a page while a RM discussion is in progress," early on 1 February, and then later the same day commence moving all these
756:
per consensus. More of a procedural close since the page moves were made before this debate closed. Good decision, bad precedent for inexperienced editors, especially since this RM did not run a full course of seven days. Moot point at present, though due to the circumstances, there is no prejudice
2018:
it to play out for the whole week once started, especially if there is any sort of dialog, so that firm consensus can be reached. We are all busy and on different schedules (r even time zones!) so discussion can be slow. A consensus means everyone felt heard and mostly satisfied. Once everyone is
2010:
Although the convention is not "controversial" per se, I was not strongly familiar with it, which is why I brought it to the discussion; otherwise I would have made the original proposed changes myself. I would have been fine with "Parkville station (Connecticut)" since it was perhaps the odd one
1864:
Looking at USSTATION, I initially thought disambiguation should be by state first, then by transit system. But apparently I was wrong since "Context will determine the most suitable distinguishing term". So based on that, I probably should not have moved the article about
Parkville station since
1963:
Sorry for the mistake. This does mean that there are exceptions, though, and maybe this could have been one of the exceptions because it was a bus station. I guess I should have let the RM run its course, then, even if there was consensus to move the pages to their current titles.
1983:
1742:(and see it while it lasts, it's very much a work in progress, and comments welcome on its talk page). But we need to be aware of them, and I was concerned that newcomers seeing this discussion might be misled unless I said something. That's my agenda.
1824:
I see that. I didn't realize before that you should not move a page that is affected by an RM. What I don't get is why I can't move a page after the RM is over, which you were implying by my move of
Parkville station to a different qualifier.
1557:, to me your action seems a blatant violation of RM procedures on several counts. Either close the RM, or let it run its course. But this seems controversial (and already messy enough) that I would think non-admin closure inadvisable.
164:
1761:
As closer doing followups, I just noted that one page, Parkville station, has been moved to a different qualifier. I would ask that no more renames be made to these pages without RM discussion, a debate that can take place
2031:
Be sure to listen all the way through – after about 7 minutes of really soothing music, the piece begins to remind of a masked man on a silver horse riding off into the sunset. Knowledge, though, is the sun that never
1023:– The operating agency Connecticut Department of Transportation is locally known as "CTDOT", while "CDOT" could be confused for Colorado or California DOT. "CTDOT" will unambiguously name any future stations. –
1365:
1300:
I don't feel strongly about this, but while we are on the topic: would it make sense to rename that article "Newington
Junction Depot", since it is now an active bus stop in addition to historic railroad site?
2019:
involved, it becomes frustrating when someone acts unilaterally before the kinks under discussion are fleshed out. I think we are all OK with the result, but left with sour taste as to how it came about.
1464:
1887:
to be bold, and be prepared to justify your changes. This encyclopedia project is a community effort of staggering proportions. So be prepared the next time you decline to follow your own good advice.
211:
1938:. It may not be an accepted naming convention at all. But agree that these proposals were uncontroversial, and could have been done boldly or requested as technical moves if admin powers were needed.
1982:
2011:
left out, after every other station was found to be unique, and
Flatbush got the state qualifier. This is pretty much why discussions should usually last at least 7-days - to iron out such kinks!
1586:, there is not a single oppose !vote on this discussion so far, hence "unanimous consensus" in my above comment. WP:USSTATION is pretty much consensus for most U.S. bus and train stations.
158:
55:
1582:
while this RM was ongoing, so I went based on their precedent. I have changed the "current names" of the stations, and I'll let this RM run its course. As to your comment
502:
476:
2160:
649:
2145:
781:
752:
443:
1317:, currently also a redirect to the article, would be the best name. "Newington Junction Railroad Depot" is the NRHP name, but those are not considered official.
1335:
I have added
Newington back into this request using the actual name of the present article. If anyone disagrees, then please feel free to revert the addition.
2155:
2130:
348:
338:
2140:
1095:
90:
2135:
2125:
2022:(Aside, before we start to beat a bottle of glue, so we should start winding down the post discussion. I defer to the soothing music linked above.) –
1879:
Regarding reverting the
Parkville move, already answered. Better to leave things alone for now. Regarding being bold, that option is very much like
1468:
659:
1667:
for criticism as this was a litany of poor procedure by many participants. And the end result is good. But please all read the RM instructions.
2170:
2165:
453:
314:
1788:
USSTATION is (mostly) uncontroversial since it's Knowledge policy. I don't know why a separate RM has to be made for an uncontroversial move.
1401:
rail stations, but Flatbush Avenue is also proposed rail station, but there are several conflicting rail station names. I already renamed it
1228:
with Secondarywaltz's proposal with Cuchullain's Parkville modification. Thanks for being willing to accept the different proposal, Zfish118.
2175:
2080:
1931:
1579:
1402:
857:
96:
179:
1682:
It's all right. I know that I violated a major RM policy, but now I know to wait until the RM is over next time, even if everyone agrees.
741:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
146:
2150:
932:
808:
1916:
I agree that USSTATION is uncontroversial, and discussions to conform are usually not necessary. But it's a convention, not a policy.
1535:
would you mind withdrawing the request? I can't close it myself, and you seem to be in support of the alternative USSTATION proposal.
1252:
1013:
895:
621:
617:
305:
266:
2083:
is acceptable for that article, as it's planned for rail service as well as CTfastrak. And to one of the above comments, of course
2094:
1739:
1724:
1454:
1374:
1168:
1143:
419:
2068:
1004:
941:
886:
881:
817:
110:
41:
140:
1575:
977:
853:
698:
552:
115:
31:
2072:
1158:
936:
85:
136:
1039:
1017:
812:
613:
604:
547:
241:
35:
1008:
959:
945:
835:
410:
371:
76:
981:
1610:
There is total agreement here. What's the friggin' problem? There is none! I believe stations can be renamed citing
186:
1705:
1361:
1314:
1088:
986:
950:
899:
862:
826:
1717:
Yeah, sorry about that, you were right about the Flatbush station, I typed the name wrong. Thanks for the catch.--
963:
2046:
1898:
1854:
1814:
1777:
1639:
1346:
1290:
990:
954:
916:
796:
732:
207:
1619:
1421:
Don't do that. It confuses people if you move a page while a RM discussion is in progress. I have reverted it.
1103:
1083:
1044:
999:
995:
890:
871:
821:
1444:
229:
1133:
972:
1322:
1233:
1064:
120:
968:
844:
152:
1649:
742:
247:
17:
2091:
2038:
1989:
1969:
1958:
1890:
1870:
1846:
1830:
1806:
1793:
1769:
1721:
1694:
1601:
discussion to find the best solution and work through any complications like Parkville or Flatbush. –
1591:
1541:
1496:
1451:
1426:
1371:
1338:
1282:
1165:
1140:
1054:
908:
839:
788:
507:
481:
200:
2084:
2076:
1615:
1611:
1509:
1266:
1200:
1129:
1121:
1099:
1073:
1049:
866:
830:
804:
Just so there is no confusion in the future, the following list shows the exact recent page moves:
172:
66:
418:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
313:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1921:
1517:
1318:
1229:
1212:
1125:
297:
81:
1943:
1747:
1672:
1562:
1154:
1078:
62:
1526:
I have moved all the pages already. I think there is a unanimous consensus per WP:USSTATION.
2067:: Sorry to weigh in now, Parkville station may actually be worth its own discussion. Either
762:
386:
365:
2110:
2099:
2088:
2050:
2026:
2005:
1997:
1973:
1965:
1947:
1925:
1902:
1874:
1866:
1858:
1834:
1826:
1818:
1797:
1789:
1781:
1751:
1729:
1718:
1712:
1698:
1690:
1676:
1664:
1623:
1605:
1595:
1587:
1566:
1554:
1545:
1537:
1521:
1500:
1492:
1475:
1459:
1448:
1430:
1422:
1409:
1379:
1368:
1350:
1326:
1305:
1294:
1270:
1237:
1216:
1204:
1187:
1173:
1162:
1148:
1137:
1107:
1059:
1027:
920:
848:
799:
1447:
would be the most appropriate title here. We can revisit if another article is created.--
281:
260:
1256:
609:
1405:, matching other Connecticut train stations with multiple past and present services. –
568:
541:
2119:
2107:
2023:
1954:
1917:
1880:
1735:
1709:
1602:
1530:
1513:
1472:
1416:
1406:
1398:
1302:
1208:
1184:
1024:
625:
592:
1939:
1935:
1743:
1708:, and I had been waiting for a reply from Cúchullain about the Flatbush station. –
1668:
1571:
1558:
402:
1981:
2079:, and in fact my opinion is that (CTfastrak) is the clearer title. By contrast,
1574:
I wasn't aware that this ran afoul of RM procedures. Two other users have moved
310:
495:
470:
1648:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
392:
287:
688:
1279:
Newington has been removed as the malformity in this requested move.
1738:
of course. The rules are just there to help us to collaborate, see
582:
1098:
there should be no suffix, except if required for disambiguation.
612:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
1704:
the pages was done smoothly. For instance, there are still some
1364:
would seem to be the best name, judging by Google News results.
757:
toward any editor opening a new requested move for these pages
1443:
Unless there's another article on "Flatbrush Avenue station",
1132:. Any that require additional disambiguation should be titled
415:
223:
195:
26:
687:
608:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
1465:
Flatbush Avenue–Brooklyn College (IRT Nostrand Avenue Line)
616:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1584:
But this seems controversial (and already messy enough)
1247:
876:
2087:
is a widely accepted and followed naming convention.--
1734:
I'm all in favour of a certain flexibility, and so is
171:
1638:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1766:. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
414:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
309:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2106:(CTfastrak) would no longer be the "odd one out". –
745:. No further edits should be made to this section.
670:
1652:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1153:I only find one that needs to be disambiguated:
517:Knowledge:WikiProject New England Public Transit
505:, a project which is currently considered to be
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
520:Template:WikiProject New England Public Transit
1508:, go with Secondarywaltz's proposal to follow
1471:are the two in particular that may conflict. –
185:
8:
1157:is ambiguous, so that article should be at
227:
1183:: I am OK with the alternative proposal. –
1096:Knowledge:Naming conventions (US stations)
731:The following is a closed discussion of a
667:
536:
465:
360:
255:
1934:but I can't see that it's linked to from
1397:: I inadvertently addressed this editing
1245:: One of the proposed pages to be moved,
210:on 14 December 2014 (UTC). The result of
2014:Participants in a discussion reasonably
1469:Flatbush Avenue (BMT Fulton Street Line)
18:Talk:Downtown New Britain (CDOT station)
538:
467:
362:
257:
2161:Low-importance rail transport articles
1583:
503:WikiProject New England Public Transit
2146:Low-importance bus transport articles
2081:Flatbush Avenue station (Connecticut)
1932:Category:Knowledge naming conventions
1580:Flatbush Avenue station (Connecticut)
1403:Flatbush Avenue station (Connecticut)
858:Flatbush Avenue station (Connecticut)
7:
1683:
937:Downtown New Britain (CTDOT station)
750:The result of the move request was:
602:This article is within the scope of
501:This article is within the scope of
408:This article is within the scope of
303:This article is within the scope of
2156:Start-Class rail transport articles
2131:Low-importance Connecticut articles
933:Downtown New Britain (CDOT station)
809:Downtown New Britain (CDOT station)
671:Associated projects or task forces:
523:New England Public Transit articles
246:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
2141:Start-Class bus transport articles
1018:Newington Junction (CTDOT station)
928:Original requested move proposal:
25:
1253:Newington Junction Railroad Depot
1248:Newington Junction (CDOT station)
1014:Newington Junction Railroad Depot
896:Newington Junction Railroad Depot
323:Knowledge:WikiProject Connecticut
2136:WikiProject Connecticut articles
2126:Start-Class Connecticut articles
1979:
1740:User:Andrewa/Rules, rules, rules
1684:
1614:without this discussion anyway.
1009:Sigourney Street (CTDOT station)
946:East Main Street (CTDOT station)
581:
567:
540:
494:
469:
395:
385:
364:
326:Template:WikiProject Connecticut
290:
280:
259:
228:
199:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
2069:Parkville station (Connecticut)
1128:is the standard recommended by
1005:Sigourney Street (CDOT station)
982:Flatbush Avenue (CTDOT station)
942:East Main Street (CDOT station)
887:Sigourney Street (CDOT station)
882:Parkville station (Connecticut)
818:East Main Street (CDOT station)
654:This article has been rated as
448:This article has been rated as
343:This article has been rated as
206:This article was nominated for
1663:I should not have singled out
1576:Flatbush Avenue (CDOT station)
978:Flatbush Avenue (CDOT station)
854:Flatbush Avenue (CDOT station)
724:Requested move 29 January 2018
1:
2171:WikiProject Stations articles
2166:Start-Class Stations articles
2075:could be acceptable based on
2073:Parkville station (CTfastrak)
1159:Parkville station (CTfastrak)
877:Parkville station (CTfastrak)
696:This article is supported by
622:WikiProject Trains to do list
422:and see a list of open tasks.
317:and see a list of open tasks.
53:Put new text under old text.
2176:All WikiProject Trains pages
2111:18:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
2100:17:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
2051:01:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
2027:21:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1998:17:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1974:17:16, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1948:09:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1926:06:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1903:15:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1875:05:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1859:02:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1835:01:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1819:01:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1798:00:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1782:23:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1752:19:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1730:17:55, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1713:17:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1699:14:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1677:10:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1624:03:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1606:03:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1596:01:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1567:23:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1546:22:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1522:05:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1501:04:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1476:19:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1460:15:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1431:04:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1410:17:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1380:15:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1351:06:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1327:02:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1306:15:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1295:14:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1271:13:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1238:05:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1217:18:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1188:00:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1174:15:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1149:22:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
1108:22:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
1040:Downtown New Britain station
1028:16:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
964:Cedar Street (CTDOT station)
921:06:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
813:Downtown New Britain station
800:03:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
634:Knowledge:WikiProject Trains
36:Downtown New Britain station
1491:Secondarywaltz's proposal.
1035:They should be renamed to:
991:Kane Street (CTDOT station)
960:Cedar Street (CDOT station)
955:East Street (CTDOT station)
836:Cedar Street (CDOT station)
637:Template:WikiProject Trains
428:Knowledge:WikiProject Buses
61:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2192:
2151:WikiProject Buses articles
1362:Newington Junction station
1315:Newington Junction station
1089:Newington Junction station
987:Kane Street (CDOT station)
951:East Street (CDOT station)
900:Newington Junction station
863:Kane Street (CDOT station)
827:East Street (CDOT station)
660:project's importance scale
514:New England Public Transit
477:New England Public Transit
454:project's importance scale
431:Template:WikiProject Buses
349:project's importance scale
1000:Parkville (CTDOT station)
695:
666:
653:
562:
489:
447:
380:
342:
275:
254:
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
1645:Please do not modify it.
1445:Flatbrush Avenue station
1255:and has been for years.
1084:Sigourney Street station
1045:East Main Street station
996:Parkville (CDOT station)
891:Sigourney Street station
872:Parkville (CDOT station)
822:East Main Street station
738:Please do not modify it.
1134:Xxx station (CTfastrak)
1065:Flatbush Avenue station
973:Elmwood (CTDOT station)
640:rail transport articles
306:WikiProject Connecticut
1195:the original plan and
969:Elmwood (CDOT station)
845:Elmwood (CDOT station)
692:
434:bus transport articles
236:This article is rated
86:avoid personal attacks
691:
111:Neutral point of view
1055:Cedar Street station
840:Cedar Street station
782:closed by page mover
699:WikiProject Stations
329:Connecticut articles
116:No original research
1706:WP:Double redirects
1612:Knowledge:USSTATION
1360:Agree with Pi that
1251:, is a redirect to
1074:Kane Street station
1050:East Street station
867:Kane Street station
831:East Street station
693:
605:WikiProject Trains
298:Connecticut portal
242:content assessment
97:dispute resolution
58:
2097:
2053:
2048:
2000:
1984:
1978:Music soothes...
1905:
1900:
1861:
1856:
1821:
1816:
1784:
1779:
1727:
1457:
1377:
1353:
1348:
1297:
1292:
1171:
1155:Parkville station
1146:
1079:Parkville station
923:
918:
798:
785:
718:
717:
714:
713:
710:
709:
706:
705:
600:
599:
535:
534:
531:
530:
464:
463:
460:
459:
411:WikiProject Buses
359:
358:
355:
354:
222:
221:
194:
193:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
2183:
2095:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2009:
1996:
1992:
1986:
1985:
1962:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1885:very good reason
1857:
1853:
1849:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1725:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1647:
1534:
1455:
1420:
1375:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1263:
1250:
1169:
1144:
919:
915:
911:
879:
795:
791:
779:
773:
769:
765:
740:
678:
668:
642:
641:
638:
635:
632:
585:
576:
575:
571:
564:
563:
558:
555:
544:
537:
525:
524:
521:
518:
515:
498:
491:
490:
485:
473:
466:
436:
435:
432:
429:
426:
405:
400:
399:
398:
389:
382:
381:
376:
368:
361:
331:
330:
327:
324:
321:
300:
295:
294:
293:
284:
277:
276:
271:
263:
256:
239:
233:
232:
224:
203:
196:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
2191:
2190:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2116:
2115:
2040:Paine Ellsworth
2039:
2003:
1990:
1980:
1959:Paine Ellsworth
1952:
1930:It's listed at
1892:Paine Ellsworth
1891:
1848:Paine Ellsworth
1847:
1808:Paine Ellsworth
1807:
1771:Paine Ellsworth
1770:
1685:
1661:
1656:
1643:
1528:
1414:
1340:Paine Ellsworth
1339:
1284:Paine Ellsworth
1283:
1257:
1246:
1060:Elmwood station
910:Paine Ellsworth
909:
875:
849:Elmwood station
790:Paine Ellsworth
789:
771:
767:
763:
736:
726:
676:
639:
636:
633:
630:
629:
601:
587:
586:
556:
550:
522:
519:
516:
513:
512:
479:
433:
430:
427:
424:
423:
401:
396:
394:
374:
328:
325:
322:
319:
318:
296:
291:
289:
269:
240:on Knowledge's
237:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2189:
2187:
2179:
2178:
2173:
2168:
2163:
2158:
2153:
2148:
2143:
2138:
2133:
2128:
2118:
2117:
2114:
2113:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2020:
2012:
1950:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1701:
1660:
1657:
1655:
1654:
1640:requested move
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1616:Secondarywaltz
1598:
1524:
1503:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1355:
1354:
1330:
1329:
1309:
1308:
1298:
1274:
1273:
1240:
1219:
1201:Secondarywaltz
1190:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1122:Secondarywaltz
1100:Secondarywaltz
1092:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1021:
1020:
1011:
1002:
993:
984:
975:
966:
957:
948:
939:
926:
925:
924:
903:
902:
893:
884:
869:
860:
851:
842:
833:
824:
815:
748:
747:
733:requested move
727:
725:
722:
720:
716:
715:
712:
711:
708:
707:
704:
703:
694:
684:
683:
681:
679:
673:
672:
664:
663:
656:Low-importance
652:
646:
645:
643:
610:rail transport
598:
597:
588:
580:
579:
574:
572:
560:
559:
557:Low‑importance
545:
533:
532:
529:
528:
526:
499:
487:
486:
474:
462:
461:
458:
457:
450:Low-importance
446:
440:
439:
437:
420:the discussion
407:
406:
390:
378:
377:
375:Low‑importance
369:
357:
356:
353:
352:
345:Low-importance
341:
335:
334:
332:
315:the discussion
302:
301:
285:
273:
272:
270:Low‑importance
264:
252:
251:
245:
234:
220:
219:
212:the discussion
204:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2188:
2177:
2174:
2172:
2169:
2167:
2164:
2162:
2159:
2157:
2154:
2152:
2149:
2147:
2144:
2142:
2139:
2137:
2134:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2123:
2121:
2112:
2109:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2098:
2092:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2052:
2047:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2035:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2007:
2002:
2001:
1999:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1960:
1956:
1951:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1904:
1899:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1863:
1862:
1860:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1843:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1823:
1822:
1820:
1815:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1778:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1765:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1728:
1722:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1711:
1707:
1702:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1658:
1653:
1651:
1646:
1641:
1636:
1635:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1604:
1599:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1536:
1532:
1525:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:Like the rest
1504:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1477:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1458:
1452:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1418:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1399:Hartford Line
1396:
1393:
1392:
1381:
1378:
1372:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1352:
1347:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:Pi.1415926535
1316:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1307:
1304:
1299:
1296:
1291:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1262:
1261:
1254:
1249:
1244:
1241:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:Pi.1415926535
1227:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1175:
1172:
1166:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1147:
1141:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1094:According to
1090:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1026:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1006:
1003:
1001:
997:
994:
992:
988:
985:
983:
979:
976:
974:
970:
967:
965:
961:
958:
956:
952:
949:
947:
943:
940:
938:
934:
931:
930:
929:
922:
917:
914:
913:
912:
905:
904:
901:
897:
894:
892:
888:
885:
883:
878:
873:
870:
868:
864:
861:
859:
855:
852:
850:
846:
843:
841:
837:
834:
832:
828:
825:
823:
819:
816:
814:
810:
807:
806:
805:
802:
801:
797:
794:
793:
792:
783:
778:
777:
760:
755:
754:
746:
744:
739:
734:
729:
728:
723:
721:
701:
700:
690:
686:
685:
682:
680:
675:
674:
669:
665:
661:
657:
651:
648:
647:
644:
627:
626:Trains Portal
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
596:
595:
594:
593:Trains Portal
589:
584:
578:
577:
573:
570:
566:
565:
561:
554:
549:
546:
543:
539:
527:
510:
509:
504:
500:
497:
493:
492:
488:
483:
478:
475:
472:
468:
455:
451:
445:
442:
441:
438:
421:
417:
413:
412:
404:
393:
391:
388:
384:
383:
379:
373:
370:
367:
363:
350:
346:
340:
337:
336:
333:
316:
312:
308:
307:
299:
288:
286:
283:
279:
278:
274:
268:
265:
262:
258:
253:
249:
243:
235:
231:
226:
225:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
198:
197:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
2085:WP:USSTATION
2077:WP:USSTATION
2066:
2037:
2036:
2033:
2015:
1988:
1987:
1889:
1888:
1884:
1845:
1844:
1841:
1805:
1804:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1760:
1662:
1644:
1637:
1550:
1527:
1510:WP:USSTATION
1505:
1488:
1394:
1337:
1336:
1281:
1280:
1259:
1258:
1242:
1225:
1221:
1196:
1192:
1180:
1130:WP:USSTATION
1117:
1113:
1093:
1068:
1032:
1031:
1022:
927:
907:
906:
803:
787:
786:
775:
758:
751:
749:
737:
730:
719:
697:
655:
620:. See also:
614:project page
603:
591:
590:
506:
449:
409:
403:Buses portal
344:
304:
248:WikiProjects
215:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
1764:at any time
1650:move review
1126:Xxx station
759:at any time
743:move review
320:Connecticut
311:Connecticut
267:Connecticut
238:Start-class
159:free images
42:not a forum
2120:Categories
2089:CĂşchullain
2006:Epicgenius
1966:epicgenius
1867:epicgenius
1827:epicgenius
1790:epicgenius
1719:CĂşchullain
1691:epicgenius
1665:Epicgenius
1588:epicgenius
1555:Epicgenius
1538:epicgenius
1493:epicgenius
1449:CĂşchullain
1423:epicgenius
1369:CĂşchullain
1205:CĂşchullain
1163:CĂşchullain
1138:CĂşchullain
618:discussion
1883:– have a
1659:Post move
1260:Steel1943
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
2108:Zfish118
2024:Zfish118
1955:Dicklyon
1918:Dicklyon
1710:Zfish118
1603:Zfish118
1531:Zfish118
1514:Dicklyon
1473:Zfish118
1417:Zfish118
1407:Zfish118
1303:Zfish118
1209:Daybeers
1185:Zfish118
1033:Disagree
1025:Zfish118
624:and the
553:Stations
508:inactive
482:inactive
208:deletion
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
1940:Andrewa
1744:Andrewa
1669:Andrewa
1559:Andrewa
1551:Comment
1489:Support
1243:Comment
1181:Comment
770:Hearts
658:on the
452:on the
347:on the
165:WPÂ refs
153:scholar
2016:expect
1736:policy
1222:Oppose
1193:Oppose
1114:Oppose
1067:- See
766:Happy
631:Trains
548:Trains
244:scale.
137:Google
1991:Paine
1936:WP:AT
1226:agree
1199:with
1197:agree
1120:with
1118:agree
753:moved
425:Buses
416:buses
372:Buses
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
2032:sets
1970:talk
1957:and
1944:talk
1922:talk
1871:talk
1831:talk
1794:talk
1748:talk
1695:talk
1673:talk
1620:talk
1592:talk
1563:talk
1542:talk
1518:talk
1497:talk
1467:and
1427:talk
1395:Note
1323:talk
1267:talk
1234:talk
1224:and
1213:talk
1203:and
1116:and
1104:talk
1069:Note
216:keep
214:was
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
2071:or
1881:IAR
1642:.
1578:to
1161:.--
1136:.--
774:Day
650:Low
444:Low
339:Low
187:TWL
2122::
1972:)
1946:)
1924:)
1873:)
1833:)
1796:)
1750:)
1697:)
1675:)
1622:)
1594:)
1565:)
1553::
1544:)
1520:)
1512:.
1499:)
1429:)
1367:--
1325:)
1269:)
1236:)
1215:)
1124:.
1106:)
1016:→
1007:→
998:→
989:→
980:→
971:→
962:→
953:→
944:→
935:→
898:→
889:→
880:→
874:→
865:→
856:→
847:→
838:→
829:→
820:→
811:→
761:.
735:.
677:/
551::
167:)
65:;
2096:c
2093:/
2034:!
2008::
2004:@
1968:(
1961::
1953:@
1942:(
1920:(
1869:(
1842:!
1829:(
1792:(
1746:(
1726:c
1723:/
1693:(
1671:(
1618:(
1590:(
1572:​
1561:(
1540:(
1533::
1529:@
1516:(
1495:(
1456:c
1453:/
1425:(
1419::
1415:@
1376:c
1373:/
1321:(
1301:–
1265:(
1232:(
1211:(
1207:–
1170:c
1167:/
1145:c
1142:/
1102:(
784:)
780:(
776:!
772:♥
768:♥
764:♥
702:.
662:.
628:.
511:.
484:)
480:(
456:.
351:.
250::
218:.
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
