Knowledge

Talk:Don't Look Up

Source šŸ“

365: 344: 316: 599: 466: 445: 2523: 246: 222: 256: 554: 476: 191: 966:
trouble understanding. Also, climate change poses an existential threat to much of life on earth and that's how it compares to the comet impact. The writer and director have both explained this multiple times. Whether you agree with them or not, they are the creators of the film so they know more of what it's about than anyone else does. Please do your research.
2236:" And then states, "The process depends upon collecting more observations over time and then gradually refining those orbit estimates." (Should be usable for a footnote. Also note comets with non-gravitional forces (via outgassing) need a longer arc than an asteroid.) Using the above reference a footnote should say something like: "A few images showing a short 2462: 2394: 2822:"The film ends with a scene that reflects the Last Supper. Dr. Mindy, his family, Kate, Yule, and Teddy all sit around a dinner table and engage in a hand-held prayer, spoken by Yule. After the prayer, Kate Dibiasky gives Yule a kiss, and moments later Comet Dibiasky destroys Earth. The scene also resembles a Hieronymus Bosch painting." 2057:. So no I don't accept that characterization of that review. But stepping back, the wider issue is that the film drew a whole range of responses and these deserve coverage, unless they are completely distasteful. Moreover the relevant section is headed "critical responses" and not simply "reviews". 2601:
The mid credit scene is an Easter egg. Any one who has read The Restaurant At The End Of The Universe will recognize this scene for what it is. The general fitness for survival in a hostile environment of the now stranded ark passengers the reaction to the local fauna by the presumed leader all point
2233:
When we talk about close approaches, what's important is how much we know about the orbit of an individual asteroid. When we first find something, we know almost nothing about it. Usually we just have a handful of snapshots. That's not a lot to go on. So then the race is on to gather more information
2111:
images) would need to be months/years, not hours/days. In the movie I see no mention of precovery images, only 5 photos (1h ago, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h ago) with a 4 HOUR arc (What the Minor Planet Center would call a "single-nighter"). To reach an impact probability of 80% would require a nominal trajectory
1354:
Why is the list in its current order? Meryl Streep has a vital role as the president. She is the recipient of 3 Oscars and numerous other awards - and is probably the most successful and widely known actor in the list. So why is mentioned last? Cate Blanchett is also very successful, with 2 Oscars to
965:
It's called an allegory, which means that it has two levels. Yes, it is about an impact event, but it uses the impact event to satirize the reaction to climate change from media, government, Big Tech and the overall culture. Watch literally any interview with the director and writer if you are having
2244:
images and/or follow-up observations to reduce the uncertainties of the encounter." This would leave out the requirement of an observation arc of months to achieve high confidence, but this is a notable scientific omission from the movie. Hollywood wanted to make a comedy and Amy has to pick the her
949:
I'm necroing this to add: It's all about climate change. The asteroid is a stand-in for the crisis, the behaviour people in the film show surrounding the asteroid is 1 to 1 based on how people thus far have been behaving when confronted with climate change. That's the allegory. The only places where
2535: 2765:
Well then I guess we are at an impasse. You donā€™t dispute the material that you are removing, and it looks like you acknowledge that the publisher is considered a reliable source for Knowledge, but you want to remove material that is perfectly reasonable to include here because you take issue with
2731:
I repeat, again, that the source is considered reliable with proper attribution, so the consensus is already established on the source. This should be enough to establish reliability for its inclusion here, given the material included from the piece is not controversial or disputed. Regarding the
2698:
Last I checked there is no consensus on the reliability of the author's work. Given that the source is listed as reliable, I see no problem with including it. And there is hardly anything controversial stated in the text. The film was indeed made to pillory these aspects of American society as he
2578:
Next, I want to suggest separating the various news media reviews. The second paragraph of the "Reception section" beginning with "The San Francisco Chronicle" seems to be more general reviews focused on the tone and overall performance of the movie, while the third and fourth paragraphs are more
2750:
purposes there are three components which make up the source (the piece of work itself (the article, book), the creator of the work (the writer, journalist), the publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press)) and *all* must be reliable. An unreliable author in a
2268: 855:
No way this movie's budget is 75 million. Multiple reports are saying that DiCaprio and Lawrence took $ 55 million total. And the remaining movie couldn't have been made on a $ 20 million budget. Please remove the budget unless there is a confirmed source with an updated figure.
1598:. They had less views at their peak than Don't Look Up does now. Years later, they still have monthly page views in the tens of thousands. "Too soon" is not a reason to delay indiscriminately. There has to be an affirmative case for why the 1996 film rivals the 2021 film in the 1298:
How much has this film actually earned, combining box office and streaming revenues? A recent article stated that, based on 111 million hours of viewing, this could have equated, in box office terms, based on an average ticket price of US$ 9, to a take of about US$ 441 million.
2825:
The last line appears to refer to the dinner scene as "Bosch-y" as it were, but the cited source (145, i believe) seems to direct that assertion to one of the mid-credit-scenes. idk for certain though, i just found it odd for a dinner scene to recall bosch
1133:
Never seen external links on wiki before and I've just accidentally clicked on the description of Don't Look Up and it's taken me to a life insurance policy site, then proceeded to bombard me with so many pop ups I've had to shut down chrome.
2579:
focused on partisan and other socio-political comments. Perhaps we can separate these by putting the paragraphs that start with "In a negative review" and "Nathan J. Robinson" under another subheading of "Socio-political critiques" instead.
670:
Where did most of these come from? I feel I was seeing them crop up here before they showed up on IMDB. That W magazine article is even sourcing IMDB for their use of the character names. Can anyone tell if the names originated here or not?
896:
I read the movie would be about "climate change". How? An asteroid hitting planet earth, annihilating it in a handful of seconds: how would that be connected with "climate change"? Sounds like a character of the movie crafted the summary.
1964:
A recent edit removed a review critical of the film ā€” diff and passage below. I feel that material should stay. I read the source and found the content informative and relevant (albeit not sentiments Iwould align with). A suggestion.
1021:
I think the interview with David Sirota would be a helpful citation. It explains how the allegory came about and provides evidence that Sirota and McKay set out to make a film about climate change. I found it interesting, thank you.
950:
the film deviates from the allegory is the fact that the asteroid wasn't brought onto collision course by humanity & the ending which is a satire of some people's idea that they could colonize Mars as an escape to fixing earth.
2574:
A banner underneath the "Reception" section noted that it was too long to read and navigate comfortably. I wanted to propose putting the review websites, like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic, under the heading of "Audience ratings"
2147:
I agree it may not add anything to the article. But science is never as clear-cut as movies make it out to be or we would get nothing but snorefests. One-night stands are never good for predicting the future 6 months from now. --
1594:. It doesn't take a crystal ball to know that there is essentially no chance that film this will drop down to anywhere near the 1996 Japanese limited-distribution film in views or significance. If you like examples, see the 2230:
I am sure the timing of when the probability got really high was too detailed a point for Hollywood to worry about. Even your link mentions "transgressions" in the science. Another reference about the movie mentions,
153: 2474: 635:
The first paragraph says, "warn mankind about an asteroid that will destroy Earth via a media tour." I don't think you mean to say that the asteroid is going to destroy the Earth via a media tour. --
2430:
There's been a slow-mo edit war over including the post-credits scene in the plot summary. I don't care much either way, but would like a talk page consensus over back-and-forth editing. I've seen
951: 873: 2503: 576: 1897:
and, behold, there isn't a snowflake's chance in an age of global warming that the 1996 film or its remake, which doesn't even have an article, will ever approach the 2021 film in page views.
1059:
I agree, it has nothing to do with climate change. However the creators use the impact event as a stand in for climate change. Goodness knows why. I've added this into the opening paragraph.
919:
I agree, it has nothing to do with climate change. However the creators use the impact event as a stand in for climate change. Goodness knows why. I've added this into the opening paragraph.
1993:
wrote that "McKay manages to deliver nothing more than a derivative and meandering ā€œsatireā€ of capitalism, Donald Trump, and climate deniers that will be forgotten in less than six months."
1138: 1932:
given that there's only one other article with the same name and it's a 90s foreign movie. Given that this is one of the most viewed Netflix films- ever, it's definitely the primary topic.
933:
Its incredibly easy to understand why, both lead to the extinction of humanity (and possile all other life) but a comet impact is more fit for film since it happens faster and is explosive.
2684:
The author also has to be reliable, source can refer to three things as you well know. This author publishes conspiracy pieces... Do you have anything which says that they're reliable?
424: 2602:
to the 2000 odd passengers being the metaphorical equivalent of the passengers of the Golgafrincham Ark B from the above named novel by Douglas Addams. Fitting in a most relevant way.
2406: 980:
The movie begins with a shot of two polar bears along with the sound of boiling water on the soundtrack. This might be an important clue as to just what the allegory is referring.
1232: 325: 232: 147: 1811:
per PTOPIC. Most English-language reliable sources seem to refer to the 2021 film, and the difference in page views is unlikely to reduce even after several years. --
428: 2582:
Lastly, I believe the sentence about Bong Joon-ho can be moved to the end of the second paragraph -- I feel like it's a little out of place at the end of the section
2039:
The bulk of the full article is more of a political rant about the US government's response to Covid 19 than a review of the film. Could that be why it was removed?
2894: 2204:, served as an "astrotech adviser" for the film. She provided scientific advice and supported with writing scenes from an early stage of production". And that the 570: 415: 405: 1403: 1737:
per nom and especially Adumbrativus' rationale. This film will clearly remain much more significant in the long term than the 1996 film by all possible metrics.
2919: 1691:
into account this film is already much more notable than the 1996 film, at least for English-speaking readers which is what the English Knowledge focuses on. ā€”
1577:
If I understand the proposal correctly, this is that the article be remained simply 'Don't Look Up', in which case I agree with comment made by Laundry above.
2899: 2879: 2699:
says in the review. The material is also long-standing, being originally added in January of 2022, shortly after the film was released on Netflix. It passes
1653:- This was just a movie, and not even very good movie. Knowledge should be equal platform, its content should not be biased on something, which is hype now. 582: 1493:: Only three choices offered when "Don't Look Up" alone is entered in the search bar, so I don't think navigating under the current status is problematic. 79: 1914:
If in the future the 2021 film is no longer the primary topic, it can be moved again, but at this time and for the foreseeable it is the primary topic.
2874: 2850: 2443: 381: 2889: 2232: 2330: 703:
Streep talked about her and Hill's names and rolls in an interview. Grande talked about hers as well. Also, as said, the script is definitely out.
2909: 2547: 532: 522: 1439:ā€“ Primary topic per page views. The 2021 film has been receiving 100k+ page views per month since the article was created in January 2021, while 44: 1003:(starts discussion at 1:05) that the comet impact is an allegory for the climate crisis. I'm thinking of adding this as a citation. Thoughts?-- 85: 2914: 2492: 1578: 1479: 1333: 1300: 1115: 877: 372: 349: 1387:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1137:
Had no idea this could happen, I get anyone can edit, but surely external links should have some kind of vetting before they're allowed.
2827: 2732:
author, the discussion is already underway on the RSN and there is no consensus reached as of yet. Edit: itā€™s closed for now it seems.--
2622: 2603: 1564: 1096: 981: 741: 955: 2884: 2507: 2470: 2454: 2402: 2386: 2131:, you need reliable secondary sources that back up this info in order to include it, if it's even notable enough in the first place. ā€” 2040: 1356: 1142: 1045: 1023: 904: 801: 498: 2112:
that is an impactor and has 3-sigma uncertainties of the order of 15000 km for the encounter. Just for those that want to know. --
364: 343: 2904: 728: 708: 617: 1323: 1200: 274: 99: 30: 1264: 168: 2869: 2240:
of only a few hours is not long enough to have high confidence in an impact 6 months away. The observation arc would require
1875: 1641: 104: 20: 2317:
It took 44 days of observation to achieve even a semblance of an orbit determination ā€“ one that was still all over the place
135: 2846: 2797: 2760: 2726: 2693: 2439: 1955:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
286: 278: 74: 1862:
the vastly higher page views combined with extensive media coverage leave no reasonable doubt this is the primary topic.
1319: 2011: 1637: 489: 450: 202: 2793: 2756: 2722: 2689: 2652: 2221: 2076: 2062: 1970: 1725: 1498: 1176: 1161: 724: 704: 65: 2774:, said somewhere else on an entirely different topic. Perhaps other editors can offer their opinions on this issue.-- 1440: 1433: 1420: 2466: 836:
can somebody add the hollywood music in media awards to the accolades table? it received 3 nominations and one win
282: 269: 227: 1845:. It is clearly the primary topic now, and in all likelihood still will be the primary topic ten years from now. 1378: 1064: 924: 764: 605: 129: 2053:
I counted 2 sentences out of 26 that referred to the pandemic and one of those compared DiCaprio's character to
2842: 2435: 2379: 1474: 1339: 1304: 881: 2656: 1582: 1119: 2831: 2607: 2305: 2264: 1100: 1095:
Don't you think this is an ironic film for about climate change? It should/could be included in the article.
745: 2717:
Yes, I am asking you to get a consensus for the reliability of the author's work as you are required to do.
2626: 2559: 2138: 1850: 1763: 1698: 985: 560: 125: 109: 2044: 1360: 1049: 1044:
A comet on track to destroy the planet earth has nothing to do with global warming. Take the reference out
1027: 908: 805: 2789: 2779: 2752: 2737: 2718: 2708: 2685: 2675: 2648: 2217: 2072: 2058: 1966: 1721: 1607: 1599: 1551: 1494: 1172: 1157: 1008: 863: 760: 2667: 1894: 1833: 1799: 1388: 672: 208: 2621:
Who was billed first or second and what the inspiration of an actor was have no place in this section.
1547: 175: 2670:- publishes quote a few of these, and his analysis seems relevant to the section it is published in.-- 1782: 2587: 2477:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
2409:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
2372: 2087:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Don%27t_Look_Up_(2021_film)&diff=prev&oldid=1063706297
1981:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Don%27t_Look_Up_(2021_film)&diff=prev&oldid=1063661059
1675: 1448: 1060: 971: 967: 920: 900: 797: 690: 2359: 190: 2488: 2016: 1989: 1742: 1688: 1658: 1514: 1462: 1391:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1328: 1233:"'It parodies our inaction': Don't Look Up, an allegory of the climate crisis, lauded by activists" 837: 723:
Also, from what I can tell some of it is coming from journalists who are watching it being filmed.
315: 161: 55: 497:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
380:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2555: 2543: 2526:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
2213: 2133: 1933: 1902: 1869: 1846: 1778: 1756: 1693: 841: 821: 779: 655: 640: 70: 2174:
But it is now known that it will come to perihelion 1.8 au from the Sun on 19 December 2022. --
2783: 2775: 2741: 2733: 2712: 2704: 2679: 2671: 2642: 2276: 2250: 2201: 2179: 2153: 2117: 1915: 1654: 1603: 1534: 1408: 1272: 1240: 1208: 1078: 1004: 938: 859: 51: 141: 1829: 1795: 1624: 2583: 2539: 2368: 2237: 2163: 2104: 2103:
In the event of an Oort cloud comet impacting Earth in 6 months with high confidence, the
1816: 1671: 1444: 686: 2260: 2170:
was estimated to come to perihelion (closest approach to the Sun) at 9.8 au in the year
1429: 1424: 613: 24: 2478: 2263:
It has a short 5-day observation arc, and will make closest approach to Earth tomorrow
1738: 1716: 1511: 377: 2434:
cited as a reason to exclude the content. Do proponents of inclusion have a response?
2171: 2863: 2700: 2431: 2413: 2054: 1898: 1890: 1863: 817: 775: 651: 636: 481: 2747: 2475:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Don't Look Up (upcoming film)
2272: 2246: 2209: 2175: 2149: 2128: 2113: 1530: 1461:
Too recent to judge if it is the primary topic. It was released in December 2021. ā€“
1074: 996: 934: 423:
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our
2208:
article quoted is supportive of the approach taken. That is not to suggest that
1400:
Despite opposing comments, this has very strong support at 17 for and 7 against.
1104: 273:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 2522: 2452: 2189: 1620: 1525:, massively overwhelming primary topic. Most of the Japanese film's traffic was 261: 1812: 1595: 1526: 1156:
Just adding two references if anyone wants to work in an activist viewpoint.
1000: 471: 251: 245: 221: 2365: 2212:
is mistaken in any way. But a reliable secondary source would be needed, as
1275: 1243: 1211: 1201:"I'm a climate scientist. Don't Look Up captures the madness I see every day" 2241: 2167: 2108: 559:
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
465: 444: 2502:
I see nothing mentioned about timing for any DVD or BlueRay availability.
2766:
something the author, an established writer who has written not only for
290: 2854: 2835: 2630: 2611: 2591: 2563: 2511: 2461: 2447: 2420: 2393: 2376: 2331:"Hollywood Can Take On Science Denial: Donā€™t Look Up Is a Great Example" 2280: 2254: 2225: 2183: 2157: 2142: 2121: 2080: 2066: 2048: 1974: 1942: 1924: 1906: 1881: 1854: 1837: 1820: 1803: 1786: 1769: 1746: 1729: 1702: 1679: 1662: 1645: 1628: 1611: 1586: 1569: 1555: 1538: 1517: 1502: 1485: 1452: 1413: 1364: 1344: 1308: 1180: 1165: 1146: 1123: 1082: 1068: 1053: 1031: 1012: 989: 975: 959: 942: 928: 912: 885: 867: 845: 825: 809: 783: 768: 749: 740:
Sorry if I'm late, but where was the leaked script? Asking for a friend.
732: 712: 694: 679: 659: 644: 475: 2517:
Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Critical Methods -- Sec. 001
2380:
Jennifer Lawrence publicly joins Twitter to comment on racial injustice
2197: 1711: 1510:- Misleading to look at views while the movie is in wide release. -- 494: 2746:
I'm not challenging the publisher I'm challenging the author, for
2398: 2193: 2668:
listed as a reliable source when proper attribution is included
2465:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
2397:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
1073:
Stop spamming about how you don't get the film on the talkpage.
593: 548: 184: 15: 1355:
her name yet she is second to last in the list. Why is that?
2162:
As a good example of how unreliable short arcs are: With an
314: 2788:
You failed to get consensus. The content has been removed.
2407:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#AILF
2188:
Just to note ā€” as the article does too ā€” that "astronomer
794:
It has had a theater release, where is the plot summary?
1265:"Critics of "Don't Look Up" are missing the entire point" 2267:
but the 3-sigma uncertainty in the approach distance is
1710:
per nom and Xezbeth. This move also recalls to mind the
604:
On 4 January 2022, it was proposed that this article be
2086: 1980: 609: 2647:
can you explain why you want to use this author here?
160: 1443:
has received only five thousand views in five years.
876:
says the film probably cost around US$ 110 million.
650:
Well, OK, since no-one else has fixed it, I did. --
493:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 376:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2245:battles when trying to get her messages across. -- 2071:That removal has now been reverted, see below. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1985: 1636:ā€“ ^ 10 years? What? This is the primary topic. 289:. To improve this article, please refer to the 2012:"Don't Look Up: another lazy anti-Trump movie" 1596:page views of some movies from a few years ago 759:get rid of jonah hill. he is not in this film 174: 8: 2570:Suggestion to reorganize "Reception" section 1326:for Comedy/Musical and itā€™s not a musical. 2453:"Don't Look Up (upcoming film)" listed at 2010:Fry Schultz, Madeline (30 December 2021). 1377:The following is a closed discussion of a 1114:Chris evans doesnā€™t play Peter isherwell. 898: 795: 439: 338: 285:. To use this banner, please refer to the 216: 1960:Suggestion to reinstate a critical review 1152:Two references for an activists viewpoint 566:times. The weeks in which this happened: 2306:"How to determine the orbit of a comet?" 1318:Itā€™s a comedy film, director Adam McKay 2297: 2002: 1546:, too soon to determine primary topic. 1263:Robinson, Nathan J (26 December 2021). 1191: 952:2A02:1210:1C27:2900:54D4:1998:D9B0:F03E 441: 340: 218: 188: 2895:Low-importance Climate change articles 2504:2603:6081:7803:9F1A:3852:264:9C46:FC61 1527:driven by the release of the 2021 film 1602:factors, and I don't think there is. 1350:List of additional stars (footnote 5) 1040:Has nothing to do with global warming 7: 2920:Pages in the Knowledge Top 25 Report 2259:The first comet of 2022 is known as 1396:The result of the move request was: 1139:2A02:C7D:FA28:8D00:B0A3:197:52D3:781 577:December 26, 2021 to January 1, 2022 487:This article is within the scope of 390:Knowledge:WikiProject Climate change 370:This article is within the scope of 267:This article is within the scope of 2900:WikiProject Climate change articles 2880:American cinema task force articles 393:Template:WikiProject Climate change 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2751:reliable publication is unusable. 2531: 2527: 2498:projected DVD or blue ray release? 1893:, I have gazed into my contraband 1670:Page views don't decide anything. 1619:. Review in 10 years time or so.-- 1199:Kalmus, Peter (29 December 2021). 14: 1322:. Itā€™s also in the Golden Globes 685:Possibly from the leaked script. 323:This article is supported by the 2875:C-Class American cinema articles 2534:. Further details are available 2521: 2473:. This discussion will occur at 2460: 2405:. This discussion will occur at 2392: 1951:The discussion above is closed. 597: 552: 474: 464: 443: 363: 342: 283:regional and topical task forces 254: 244: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2890:C-Class Climate change articles 1777:per Adumbrativus and El Millo. 1271:. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 527:This article has been rated as 410:This article has been rated as 2910:Low-importance Comedy articles 2662:Why not? It's a movie review. 1434:Don't Look Up (disambiguation) 1404:closed by non-admin page mover 1231:Lu, Donna (30 December 2021). 1091:Climate change, Greta's effect 750:15:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC) 1: 2855:18:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 2836:06:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 2592:20:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC) 2564:00:21, 14 November 2022 (UTC) 2554:ā€” Assignment last updated by 2467:Don't Look Up (upcoming film) 2271:because of the short arc. -- 1638:Some Dude From North Carolina 1370:Requested move 4 January 2022 1309:09:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC) 1294:How much has the film earned? 1181:12:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 1166:11:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 1147:21:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 1124:13:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 1105:12:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC) 1083:21:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 1069:15:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC) 1054:06:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC) 1013:17:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 990:16:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 976:22:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC) 943:21:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 929:15:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC) 913:13:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC) 886:13:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC) 868:12:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC) 846:05:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC) 826:12:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC) 810:17:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC) 784:12:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC) 733:02:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 713:02:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 695:20:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 680:18:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 660:15:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC) 645:22:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 631:You might want to reword this 501:and see a list of open tasks. 384:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2512:04:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC) 2421:20:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC) 2192:, principal investigator of 1987:Madeline Fry Schultz of the 1943:12:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC) 1925:17:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC) 1907:16:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC) 1882:04:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC) 1414:16:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC) 507:Knowledge:WikiProject Comedy 2915:WikiProject Comedy articles 2493:21:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 2377:09:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 2281:15:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC) 2255:11:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC) 2226:06:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC) 2184:16:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 2158:18:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 2143:18:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 2122:18:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 2081:21:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 2067:21:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 2049:13:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 1975:10:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 1855:18:17, 9 January 2022 (UTC) 1838:23:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC) 1821:14:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC) 1804:11:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC) 1787:23:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC) 1770:19:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC) 1747:16:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC) 1730:04:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC) 1703:22:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 1680:22:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 1663:21:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 1646:13:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 1629:12:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 1612:07:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 1587:00:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC) 1570:21:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 1556:04:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 1539:13:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 1518:07:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 1503:07:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 1486:06:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 1453:02:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 1365:18:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC) 1345:05:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC) 1032:13:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 510:Template:WikiProject Comedy 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2936: 2631:10:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC) 1239:. London, United Kingdom. 1207:. London, United Kingdom. 960:00:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC) 533:project's importance scale 416:project's importance scale 373:WikiProject Climate change 326:American cinema task force 299:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 2885:WikiProject Film articles 2612:01:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 2353:Jennifer Lawrence Twitter 1421:Don't Look Up (2021 film) 769:23:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC) 610:Don't Look Up (2021 film) 526: 459: 422: 409: 358: 322: 302:Template:WikiProject Film 239: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2798:16:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC) 2784:20:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC) 2761:17:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC) 2742:17:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC) 2727:16:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC) 2713:16:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC) 2694:16:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC) 2680:16:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC) 2657:15:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC) 2455:Redirects for discussion 2448:03:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC) 2387:Redirects for discussion 1953:Please do not modify it. 1384:Please do not modify it. 2905:C-Class Comedy articles 2469:and has thus listed it 2401:and has thus listed it 571:December 19 to 25, 2021 396:Climate change articles 2329:Oppenheimer, Rebecca. 1995: 1090: 725:Samurai Kung fu Cowboy 705:Samurai Kung fu Cowboy 319: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 2870:C-Class film articles 2538:. Student editor(s): 2234:about it (the orbit). 1794:per nom. Huge film. ā€” 318: 100:Neutral point of view 2841:Good point. Thanks! 2818:Error in Easter Egg? 2200:mission that tracks 2020:. Washington DC, USA 583:January 2 to 8, 2022 105:No original research 2843:Firefangledfeathers 2703:by my estimation.-- 2436:Firefangledfeathers 2335:Scientific American 2206:Scientific American 2017:Washington Examiner 1990:Washington Examiner 425:recommended sources 275:join the discussion 2536:on the course page 2426:Post-credits scene 2202:Near-Earth objects 2166:of 2.6 days comet 1828:per Adumbrativus. 1754:per Kleinpecan. -- 490:WikiProject Comedy 320: 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2528:24 September 2022 2385:"AILF" listed at 2308:. esa. 2014-03-07 2218:RobbieIanMorrison 2129:original research 2073:RobbieIanMorrison 2059:RobbieIanMorrison 1967:RobbieIanMorrison 1495:RobbieIanMorrison 1407: 1173:RobbieIanMorrison 1158:RobbieIanMorrison 915: 903:comment added by 851:Remove the Budget 812: 800:comment added by 628: 627: 592: 591: 547: 546: 543: 542: 539: 538: 438: 437: 434: 433: 337: 336: 333: 332: 277:and see lists of 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2927: 2790:Horse Eye's Back 2753:Horse Eye's Back 2719:Horse Eye's Back 2686:Horse Eye's Back 2649:Horse Eye's Back 2646: 2597:Mid Credit scene 2566: 2548:article contribs 2533: 2529: 2525: 2485: 2464: 2396: 2363: 2345: 2344: 2342: 2341: 2326: 2320: 2319: 2314: 2313: 2302: 2029: 2028: 2026: 2025: 2007: 1940: 1922: 1766: 1761: 1759: 1567: 1482: 1477: 1411: 1401: 1386: 1336: 1331: 1286: 1285: 1283: 1282: 1260: 1254: 1253: 1251: 1250: 1228: 1222: 1221: 1219: 1218: 1196: 677: 675:Rusted AutoParts 616:. The result of 601: 600: 594: 556: 555: 549: 515: 514: 511: 508: 505: 484: 479: 478: 468: 461: 460: 455: 447: 440: 398: 397: 394: 391: 388: 367: 360: 359: 354: 346: 339: 307: 306: 303: 300: 297: 270:WikiProject Film 264: 259: 258: 257: 248: 241: 240: 235: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2935: 2934: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2860: 2859: 2820: 2640: 2638: 2636:Challenged text 2619: 2599: 2572: 2553: 2532:3 December 2022 2519: 2500: 2479: 2458: 2428: 2412: 2390: 2357: 2355: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2339: 2337: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2311: 2309: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2238:observation arc 2164:observation arc 2105:observation arc 2101: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2023: 2021: 2009: 2008: 2004: 1962: 1957: 1956: 1934: 1916: 1764: 1757: 1755: 1712:move discussion 1687:as even taking 1600:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1565: 1563:per Xezbeth. ā€“ 1480: 1475: 1409: 1382: 1372: 1352: 1334: 1329: 1316: 1296: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1280: 1278: 1269:Current Affairs 1262: 1261: 1257: 1248: 1246: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1216: 1214: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1154: 1131: 1112: 1093: 1061:Sirhissofloxley 1042: 921:Sirhissofloxley 894: 892:Climate Change? 853: 834: 792: 761:Iknowthef444cts 757: 673: 668: 666:Character names 633: 598: 588: 553: 513:Comedy articles 512: 509: 506: 503: 502: 480: 473: 453: 395: 392: 389: 386: 385: 352: 304: 301: 298: 295: 294: 260: 255: 253: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2933: 2931: 2923: 2922: 2917: 2912: 2907: 2902: 2897: 2892: 2887: 2882: 2877: 2872: 2862: 2861: 2858: 2857: 2819: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2637: 2634: 2618: 2615: 2598: 2595: 2571: 2568: 2518: 2515: 2499: 2496: 2471:for discussion 2457: 2451: 2427: 2424: 2410: 2403:for discussion 2389: 2383: 2354: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2321: 2296: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2257: 2160: 2100: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2083: 2031: 2030: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1984: 1983: 1961: 1958: 1950: 1948: 1946: 1945: 1930:Strong support 1927: 1909: 1895:WP:CRYSTALBALL 1884: 1857: 1840: 1823: 1806: 1789: 1772: 1749: 1732: 1717:Marriage Story 1705: 1682: 1665: 1648: 1631: 1614: 1589: 1579:144.139.198.37 1572: 1558: 1541: 1523:Strong Support 1520: 1505: 1488: 1437: 1436: 1427: 1417: 1394: 1393: 1379:requested move 1373: 1371: 1368: 1351: 1348: 1315: 1312: 1301:173.88.246.138 1295: 1292: 1288: 1287: 1255: 1223: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1171:And another. 1153: 1150: 1130: 1127: 1116:120.21.145.183 1111: 1108: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1041: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1016: 1015: 1001:this interview 963: 962: 947: 946: 945: 893: 890: 889: 888: 878:173.88.246.138 852: 849: 833: 830: 829: 828: 791: 788: 787: 786: 756: 753: 738: 737: 736: 735: 718: 717: 716: 715: 698: 697: 667: 664: 663: 662: 632: 629: 626: 625: 618:the discussion 602: 590: 589: 587: 586: 580: 574: 567: 557: 545: 544: 541: 540: 537: 536: 529:Low-importance 525: 519: 518: 516: 499:the discussion 486: 485: 469: 457: 456: 454:Lowā€‘importance 448: 436: 435: 432: 431: 420: 419: 412:Low-importance 408: 402: 401: 399: 387:Climate change 382:the discussion 378:Climate change 368: 356: 355: 353:Lowā€‘importance 350:Climate change 347: 335: 334: 331: 330: 321: 311: 310: 308: 266: 265: 249: 237: 236: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2932: 2921: 2918: 2916: 2913: 2911: 2908: 2906: 2903: 2901: 2898: 2896: 2893: 2891: 2888: 2886: 2883: 2881: 2878: 2876: 2873: 2871: 2868: 2867: 2865: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2828:65.99.103.126 2823: 2817: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2749: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2644: 2635: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2623:193.242.214.5 2616: 2614: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2604:47.135.195.68 2596: 2594: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2580: 2576: 2569: 2567: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556:Rebsmartyside 2551: 2549: 2545: 2544:Rebsmartyside 2541: 2537: 2524: 2516: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2497: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2484: 2483: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2463: 2456: 2450: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2432:MOS:PLOTBLOAT 2425: 2423: 2422: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2395: 2388: 2384: 2382: 2381: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2361: 2352: 2336: 2332: 2325: 2322: 2318: 2307: 2301: 2298: 2294: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2269:Ā±1 million km 2266: 2262: 2258: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214:Facu-el Millo 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2110: 2106: 2098: 2088: 2084: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2019: 2018: 2013: 2006: 2003: 1999: 1994: 1992: 1991: 1982: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1959: 1954: 1949: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1938: 1931: 1928: 1926: 1923: 1921: 1920: 1913: 1910: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1879: 1878: 1873: 1872: 1867: 1866: 1861: 1858: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847:Wasted Time R 1844: 1841: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1824: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1790: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1767: 1760: 1758:Victor Trevor 1753: 1750: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1713: 1709: 1706: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1695: 1690: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1632: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1615: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1590: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1521: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1506: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1491:Weakly oppose 1489: 1487: 1483: 1478: 1472: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441:the 1996 film 1435: 1431: 1430:Don't Look Up 1428: 1426: 1425:Don't Look Up 1422: 1419: 1418: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1405: 1399: 1392: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1369: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1349: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1337: 1332: 1325: 1321: 1313: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1293: 1277: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1259: 1256: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1227: 1224: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1151: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1135: 1128: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1109: 1107: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097:79.116.98.225 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1039: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 993: 992: 991: 987: 983: 982:71.255.130.67 978: 977: 973: 969: 961: 957: 953: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 931: 930: 926: 922: 918: 917: 916: 914: 910: 906: 902: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 872: 871: 870: 869: 865: 861: 857: 850: 848: 847: 843: 839: 831: 827: 823: 819: 816:there is one 815: 814: 813: 811: 807: 803: 799: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 772: 771: 770: 766: 762: 754: 752: 751: 747: 743: 742:165.73.227.21 734: 730: 726: 722: 721: 720: 719: 714: 710: 706: 702: 701: 700: 699: 696: 692: 688: 684: 683: 682: 681: 678: 676: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 648: 647: 646: 642: 638: 630: 623: 619: 615: 614:Don't Look Up 611: 607: 603: 596: 595: 584: 581: 578: 575: 572: 569: 568: 565: 562: 561:Top 25 Report 558: 551: 550: 534: 530: 524: 521: 520: 517: 500: 496: 492: 491: 483: 482:Comedy portal 477: 472: 470: 467: 463: 462: 458: 452: 449: 446: 442: 430: 426: 421: 417: 413: 407: 404: 403: 400: 383: 379: 375: 374: 369: 366: 362: 361: 357: 351: 348: 345: 341: 328: 327: 317: 313: 312: 309: 305:film articles 292: 288: 287:documentation 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 263: 252: 250: 247: 243: 242: 238: 234: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 25:Don't Look Up 22: 18: 17: 2824: 2821: 2776:C.J. Griffin 2771: 2767: 2734:C.J. Griffin 2705:C.J. Griffin 2672:C.J. Griffin 2663: 2643:C.J. Griffin 2639: 2620: 2600: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2552: 2520: 2501: 2481: 2480: 2459: 2429: 2415: 2414: 2391: 2356: 2338:. Retrieved 2334: 2324: 2316: 2310:. Retrieved 2300: 2292: 2265:2022-Jan-08, 2205: 2132: 2102: 2099:Comet impact 2022:. Retrieved 2015: 2005: 1997: 1988: 1986: 1963: 1952: 1947: 1936: 1935: 1929: 1918: 1917: 1911: 1889:. Doing the 1886: 1876: 1870: 1864: 1859: 1842: 1825: 1808: 1791: 1774: 1751: 1734: 1715: 1707: 1692: 1689:WP:RECENTISM 1684: 1667: 1650: 1633: 1616: 1604:Adumbrativus 1591: 1574: 1560: 1548:BilledMammal 1543: 1522: 1507: 1490: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1458: 1438: 1397: 1395: 1383: 1376: 1353: 1327: 1317: 1297: 1279:. Retrieved 1268: 1258: 1247:. Retrieved 1237:The Guardian 1236: 1226: 1215:. Retrieved 1205:The Guardian 1204: 1194: 1186: 1155: 1136: 1132: 1113: 1094: 1043: 1005:C.J. Griffin 997:David Sirota 979: 964: 899:ā€”Ā Preceding 895: 874:This article 860:Navjot Singh 858: 854: 835: 796:ā€”Ā Preceding 793: 758: 739: 674: 669: 634: 621: 563: 528: 488: 411: 371: 324: 268: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2216:indicates. 2190:Amy Mainzer 2107:(including 2041:82.10.72.55 1830:Robby.is.on 1796:Jonny Nixon 1389:move review 1357:82.10.72.55 1324:nominations 1046:76.72.148.7 1024:82.10.72.55 905:94.38.201.7 802:51.6.10.171 429:style guide 262:Film portal 148:free images 31:not a forum 2864:Categories 2772:The Nation 2584:Bluekat343 2540:Bluekat343 2369:Theys York 2340:2022-01-04 2312:2022-01-08 2293:References 2261:C/2022 A1. 2024:2022-01-02 1998:References 1672:Trillfendi 1445:Kleinpecan 1281:2021-12-30 1249:2021-12-30 1217:2021-12-29 1187:References 1129:Spam Links 968:Quagga1883 755:jonah hill 687:Trillfendi 291:guidelines 279:open tasks 2770:but also 2482:Steel1943 2366:this one? 2360:Draco9904 2242:precovery 2168:C/2017 K2 2109:precovery 1937:shanghai. 1739:Lennart97 1566:AnneĀ drew 1512:Netoholic 1276:2471-2647 1244:0261-3077 1212:0261-3077 995:Producer 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2851:contribs 2444:contribs 2416:Rosguill 2411:signed, 2134:El Millo 2127:This is 2055:Dr Fauci 1899:Favonian 1865:SNUGGUMS 1694:El Millo 1330:starship 1075:ā˜…Trekker 999:says in 935:ā˜…Trekker 901:unsigned 838:Alex5675 818:Kuhnaims 798:unsigned 776:Kuhnaims 652:MelanieN 637:MelanieN 427:and our 233:American 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2768:Jacobin 2664:Jacobin 2273:Kheider 2247:Kheider 2210:Kheider 2198:NEOWISE 2176:Kheider 2150:Kheider 2114:Kheider 1919:Calidum 1912:Support 1887:Support 1860:Support 1843:Support 1826:Support 1809:Support 1792:Support 1775:Support 1752:Support 1735:Support 1708:Support 1685:Support 1668:Comment 1634:Support 1592:Support 1561:Support 1531:Xezbeth 1464:Laundry 1410:ASUKITE 1320:said so 531:on the 414:on the 199:C-class 154:WPĀ refs 142:scholar 2701:WP:DUE 1891:WP:IAR 1779:Zaxian 1651:Oppose 1621:Smerus 1617:Oppose 1575:Oppose 1544:Oppose 1508:Oppose 1459:Oppose 1398:moved. 1335:.paint 1314:Comedy 774:he is 504:Comedy 495:comedy 451:Comedy 205:scale. 126:Google 2748:WP:RS 2172:2027. 1877:edits 1813:Ab207 1467:Pizza 1340:exalt 622:moved 608:from 606:moved 585:(5th) 579:(2nd) 573:(8th) 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2847:talk 2832:talk 2794:talk 2780:talk 2757:talk 2738:talk 2723:talk 2709:talk 2690:talk 2676:talk 2653:talk 2627:talk 2617:Cast 2608:talk 2588:talk 2560:talk 2530:and 2508:talk 2489:talk 2440:talk 2399:AILF 2373:talk 2364:and 2277:talk 2251:talk 2222:talk 2194:NASA 2180:talk 2154:talk 2139:talk 2118:talk 2077:talk 2063:talk 2045:talk 1971:talk 1903:talk 1871:talk 1851:talk 1834:talk 1817:talk 1800:talk 1783:talk 1765:talk 1743:talk 1726:talk 1722:ĪŸį¼¶Ī“Ī± 1714:for 1699:talk 1676:talk 1659:talk 1642:talk 1625:talk 1608:talk 1583:talk 1552:talk 1535:talk 1499:talk 1449:talk 1361:talk 1305:talk 1273:ISSN 1241:ISSN 1209:ISSN 1177:talk 1162:talk 1143:talk 1120:talk 1110:Cast 1101:talk 1079:talk 1065:talk 1050:talk 1028:talk 1009:talk 986:talk 972:talk 956:talk 939:talk 925:talk 909:talk 882:talk 864:talk 842:talk 832:hmma 822:talk 806:talk 790:Plot 780:talk 765:talk 746:talk 729:talk 709:talk 691:talk 656:talk 641:talk 620:was 296:Film 281:and 228:Film 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2550:). 2196:'s 1655:Ktt 1529:. ā€” 612:to 523:Low 406:Low 176:TWL 2866:: 2853:) 2849:/ 2834:) 2796:) 2782:) 2759:) 2740:) 2725:) 2711:) 2692:) 2678:) 2666:- 2655:) 2629:) 2610:) 2590:) 2562:) 2542:, 2510:) 2491:) 2446:) 2442:/ 2375:) 2333:. 2315:. 2279:) 2253:) 2224:) 2182:) 2156:) 2141:) 2120:) 2085:* 2079:) 2065:) 2047:) 2014:. 1973:) 1905:) 1880:) 1874:/ 1853:) 1836:) 1819:) 1802:) 1785:) 1768:) 1745:) 1728:) 1720:. 1701:) 1678:) 1661:) 1644:) 1627:) 1610:) 1585:) 1554:) 1537:) 1501:) 1484:) 1481:cĢ„ 1470:03 1451:) 1432:ā†’ 1423:ā†’ 1381:. 1363:) 1307:) 1267:. 1235:. 1203:. 1179:) 1164:) 1145:) 1122:) 1103:) 1081:) 1067:) 1052:) 1030:) 1011:) 988:) 974:) 958:) 941:) 927:) 911:) 884:) 866:) 844:) 824:) 808:) 782:) 767:) 748:) 731:) 711:) 693:) 658:) 643:) 231:: 156:) 54:; 2845:( 2830:( 2792:( 2778:( 2755:( 2736:( 2721:( 2707:( 2688:( 2674:( 2651:( 2645:: 2641:@ 2625:( 2606:( 2586:( 2558:( 2546:( 2506:( 2487:( 2438:( 2371:( 2362:: 2358:@ 2343:. 2275:( 2249:( 2231:" 2220:( 2178:( 2152:( 2137:( 2116:( 2075:( 2061:( 2043:( 2027:. 1969:( 1901:( 1868:( 1849:( 1832:( 1815:( 1798:( 1781:( 1762:( 1741:( 1724:( 1697:( 1674:( 1657:( 1640:( 1623:( 1606:( 1581:( 1550:( 1533:( 1515:@ 1497:( 1476:d 1473:( 1447:( 1406:) 1402:( 1359:( 1342:) 1338:( 1303:( 1284:. 1252:. 1220:. 1175:( 1160:( 1141:( 1118:( 1099:( 1077:( 1063:( 1048:( 1026:( 1007:( 984:( 970:( 954:( 937:( 923:( 907:( 880:( 862:( 840:( 820:( 804:( 778:( 763:( 744:( 727:( 707:( 689:( 654:( 639:( 624:. 564:3 535:. 418:. 329:. 293:. 211:: 172:Ā· 166:Ā· 158:Ā· 151:Ā· 145:Ā· 139:Ā· 133:Ā· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Don't Look Up
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WPĀ refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Film
American
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘