Talk:Doomsday (Doctor Who) - Knowledge (XXG)

1576:

universe. It brings the question of how far the time matrix of the TARDIS; which wasn't created to travel between alternate universes, could have given Rose the power from staring into its 'heart' the ability to make sure a name appears in an alternate universe; or rather could this have been simply a coincedence unconnected to her power, maybe a higher fate? or maybe it was before the point of divergence at when Rose had the power of the "vortex running through her head" and could 'see every potential outcome', so was able to add that in this universe which altered the other; BUT the point of divergence for that particular alternate universe was BEFORE 'the parting of ways'. Its a factor of discontinuity and is perfectly viable for discussion on a talk page about an episode at wikipedia, because one never knows what might been found as viable to add to the article in that respect.

1288:

did was change the focus of her idea; maybe rush it into production a little sooner. Maybe in this universe her husband never died, and he set up Torchwood as he'd always intended to, along with the guy who made the "telescope" at Torchwood House. All this speculation serves to illustrate is that the idea of an alternate Torchwood is not necessarily contradictory with anything we've seen, and that it does not necessarily imply the existence of an alternate Doctor. Neither does anything negate that idea; it just isn't necessary, is all. Therefore, there's no need to bring it up. --

2334:

sort of discussion is more relevant for a Doctor Who forum than a Knowledge (XXG) article. Personally, I think to describe the episode as 'awful' is perhaps a little harsh - although I agree that the conclusion is rather messy and badly written. Despite this - from what I can tell - it is the most popular series finale and one of the most popular episodes, although that is probably purely because it gave fans (new and old) the Cybermen vs Daleks episode they had long been waiting for.

219: 1002: 559: 538: 396: 932: 252: 679: 448: 569: 427: 922: 895: 2602:"There are two Torchwood references in this episode, one in the news report that Rose watches on her mobile phone which mentions the Torchwood Institute, and during the party, when Pete Tyler identifies a party-goer as "the guy from Torchwood". This implies that the Institute is either more public on this parallel Earth or is not the same type of organisation (or both)." 458: 1925:"telegraphing with their movements" on a subconcious level.) I don't know about you folks, but I've seen a lot of isntances when characters had their eyes closed ahead of time, because the person playing the character was preparing for what was coming next, even though logically the character was supposed to be totally surprised. I blame it on rehearsal. 1206:, as The Doctor mentioned in Rise of the Cybermen, Timelords would duck in and out of the alternate universes "and be home in time for tea". Thus, "Pete's World's" Torchwood could have been set up in response to a different time traveller; the Doctor from before the Time Lords died; or a totally different alien threat. 2053:

that in one episode, the Doctor says, "Each choice creates a new world." It is possible that when Queen Victoria decided to create the first Torchwood Institute, a new world was created, the same as our world is at that exact moment. Other decisions would have created the differences between the two worlds.

3054:

certainly provides sound advice regarding the use of Continuity sections in Doctor Who articles, including examples of the problems which can ocurr unless the subject is addressed with care. It doesn't generally discourage Continuity sections; it advises caution. You may find this discouraging, while

2296:

It's very hard to mention this without going into a huge rant at how awful this episode was, but should it not be in the article that the very crux of the whole void-stuff device, and thus the whole point of the climax, renders Pete's rescuing of Rose completely non-sensical? Can that be mentioned in

1736:

I can understand there should be a details episode summary for key episodes such as this, but the plot summary just goes on and on and on, it's not easily readable and would take a good few minutes to plow through properly. It doesn't need to detail every single thing that happens in the episode word

1340:

Well, I suppose it came across as speculation, but my intention was to fish out a plot hole for the possible inclusion into the article of whether it would be as unlikely as the episode made out for Rose to see the Doctor again, but since it has to do with the unfolding of the story I suppose it does

1246:

Bear in mind that the Torchwood in Pete's world seems to be much less secret, so it could have been set up much earlier. Or it could have been set up in response to something far more harmless and ordinary, and grown to encompass alien activity. Maybe it's well known as an organisation, but some of

2413:

They have earned their status as a companion, either in following consecutive episodes (Jack), By statement of the producers (Astrid), or by accreditation (Rose). Sarah Jane was also not a companion in School Reunion, but was in The Stolen Earth / Journey's End. In short; a companion's appearence in

2156:

OK, so I understand most of the article gets its information from two external links. But the average reader doesn't know that. The lead should also be rewritten to better reflect the whole article, including a plot description, (get rid of that useless synopsis section). The plot could be shortened

2052:

There is a parallel Torchwood in the parallel London. In "Tooth and Claw", Queen Victoria creates Torchwood after the Doctor's visit. He never visited the parallel earth before "Rise of the Cybermen", so, there should not be a parallel Torchwood. A possible explanation for the parallel Torchwood, is

1142:

Good news, everyone. From BBC today: "We're pleased to tell you that Murray Gold's wonderful soundtrack to Doctor Who will be making its way to CD in the near future. BBC Worldwide are working with the composer to release the highlights from his Doctor Who scores on CD. While we don't have a release

1103:

It's another great Murray Gold piece. It's mentioned in the commentary (Julie Gardner says she was humming it for two weeks after hearing it the first time; I know the feeling!). If you go to the BBC Doctor Who page, hit News and Contact Us, you'll see this bit: "What was that music on the beach? It

366: 2001:

Not sure that's a correct translation for "Bad Wolf Bay". In Danish, at least, "dårlig" is used as in "bad stomach". If the meaning is as in "bad wolf", the word would be "slemme" - not sure if that's the same in Norwegian. And "stranden" is "the beach". "Bugt" would be "bay". So, in Danish at

1468:

He could easily have a spare in the TARDIS. Alternatively, they could switch to a different magic gizmo next year (though the sonic screwdriver will likely remain) or just have him get along without it, to have an additional change from the Rose years. He got along fine without it for 26 years (900

1458:

Didn't they also "write out" Rose's superphone at one stage ;) He'll probably either magically have it back or just make a new one. I think it's more useful for the production team to have around than to be completely without it- they could always have someone challenge his stated identity (like in

1287:

Sure it does, where it serves a purpose in refuting an earlier suggestion. And it's a fair point: there's no reason to believe that the only reason Torchwood can exist is if the Doctor inspired its creation. For all we know, Victoria was already mulling the idea over in her head, and all the Doctor

2444:

I'm not saying to add him for all other episodes. He is credited as a companion before this two-parter, and in "Journey's End", fulfilling pretty much the same role in this episode as in the latter. If he is to be considered a companion in "Journey's End", then he should be in this two-parter. The

1373:

is making the point (albeit with great brevity!) that as fun as speculation is, wikipedia isn't the right place for it. Not even on talk pages, because the point of them is to serve as debate about what should go into the main article; they're not supposed to be used as a general discussion forum.

2333:

That can be put down to good luck and artstic license, but the fact the TARDIS was not sucked through is a plot hole. Also, the fact that the Cybermen outside the Taj Mahal were pulled upwards in the sky - which is away from the 'Torchwood Tower' - could be considered a plot hole - although this

1185:

universe should imply that existence of said individual, torchwood is evidence of the activities of an individual *if* being what it is as an institute intrinsically denotes the same quality for being there in the alternate universe, name et al. being evidence of existence via its modus operandi.

1924:

Hi! People have been known to have their arms outstretched for mere balance's sake. He may have been anticipating a strong wind upon his arrival and had his arms ready to grab onto something. So it could still be luck. (Granted, sometimes actors and actresses give away their intended actions by

1575:

But back to whether such talk is appropriate, they are for matters of the trivia section; if there is a logical fallacy in the story, it can be added as a fact of contradiction to the story. Another example which is arguable is the Dårlig Ulv Stranden / "Bad Wolf Bay" appearing in the alternate

1184:

Of course the existence of a person one place wouldn't indicate the existence of the same person in another reality, for the very sake of the fact that an alternate universe implies that 1 ≠ 1, i.e. its very function is being "alternate". But the activities of one individual in a self-contained

1160:

Doesn't the presence of the Torchwood institute in the alternate universe where Rose, Pete, Mickey & Jackie were stranded; confirm the existence of an alternate Doctor in that universe? Torchwood being founded because of the Doctor (it being an anagram for 'Doctor Who' kind of gives it that

2066:

Two things I would like to mention: 1) Under continuity, it is stated that Jack Harkness leaves the series in an episode featuring the Daleks, namely The Parting of the Ways, however I believe that he reappears in Utopia. Is this so, and if so, worth an edit? And the second's more of a general

1409:

Slightly un-related but still relevent to this topic: How come Earth even still exists in the parallel dimension if there is no Doctor? Over the years Earth has been invaded by innumerable aliens with nefarious intent, so who dispatched them? I can only think of three reasons for their earth's

3240:

the wording of this seems misleading to me, because in the 2 parter of "The Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit", there isn't a reunion between the Doctor and Rose, though it could be considered a final reunion between Tennant and Piper, which I could see as emotional for the actors but not the

3212:

First, I apologize if this is a silly suggestion, as I am new to Knowledge (XXG) editing, so please bear with me and try to resist the urge to laugh me out of the forum, though do feel free to delete this if it does reek of being a newbie comment. Suggestions/timid proposals for updating:

2949:

anyway - we know who she is and what her name is and it just seems pointless to list her as something else. It's a bit like listing The Master's disguises as there own anogramed name instead of just listing Anthony Aniely. I think it should be changed personaly but you may dissagree.

1410:

continued existence. ### a) Some Defender of the Weak (i.e. Doctor). ### b) No-one wants to invade their Earth - in which case what is their Torchwoods job? ### c) They've always been able to repel the defenders unaided (so why couldn't they handle the cybermen with the Doctor?). -

3066:

featured article under advisement. The absence of this section isn't a prerequisite for achieving or retaining FA status, of course (unless you are arguing otherwise). Nevertheless, if you are using this to support your position then verification won't come amiss. Oh, and let's add

1760:

Just wondering if I could change the caption from the "EXTERMINATE Delete" to that nice quote from Dalek Sec, "This is not war, this is pest control". It matches the picture nicely, and also even though the Daleks shout, we could just emphasise the loudness by putting it in bold.

2861:

The lead says "... Doctor Who episodes since the show's revival.", whilst the opening lead sentence simply mentions the "... final episode in the second series of ..." without clarifying that this is the second series since the shows revival, as technically the second series was

2273:

Actually, nevermind. It makes sense with "quite" as well. Don't know what I was sniffing when I read that. Anyway, what he meant was that the music reflects how she felt during that scene, which is exactly like if she locked herself in her room and had a good crying session.

1608:

I seem to recall a rumor somewhere that Billie Piper wanted to play a female version of the doctor, and that RTD had plans to bring her back to who in the distant future, maybe she'll become that universes' equivalent of the doctor, and find some sort of means to travel in time

2087:"The Doctor states that travel between universes was impossible until the Daleks broke down the walls between worlds with the void ship. This may explain the crack in time that the TARDIS fell through in "Rise of the Cybermen" to reach the parallel Earth in the first place." 1559:

Incidentally, Torchwood probably exists in both worlds because the point of divergence is later than the creation of Torchwood. So, technically, the Doctor that exists in Peteworld is the SAME Doctor because the worlds were different AFTER that time rather than before.

3124:, complete with Continuity section. It would thus appear that either fact checking isn't one of Edokter's strengths, or inconvenient truths will be casually cast aside and replaced with fabrication if they fail to support his position. It will be interesting to see if 1374:

Sure, most of us violate that from time to time, but it's a good point. Speculation should be saved for fan forums like Outpost Gallifrey (well, I wonder if many of those people are actually fans, given the amount of sniping that appears every week, but I digress...).

3055:

other editors might just see it as one of the more enjoyably challenging aspects of Knowledge (XXG) editing. In any event, the advice certainly hasn't prevented the proliferation of Continuity sections in Doctor Who related articles, which would seem to render

1948:

in which the Doctor is actually shown weeping. I've seen every existing episode of the original and new series and I cannot think of any other occasion in which he's shown crying, thought the Ninth Doctor comes close when he tells Rose "You were fantastic" in

3289: 1428:

Trust me, it's better we just leave it be and not start asking questions like this, otherwise we might as well start asking questions like "How did the exact same sperm fertalise the exact same egg to make the exact same people exsist on this universe?"

1447:

Wonder if they wrote it out on purpose, the same way they tired to write out the sonic screwdriver way back when. Was kind of taking the fun out of it if all he has to do is flash a blank bit of paper and people suddenly accept that he's who he says he

1125:"We've still no news of a soundtrack album." Bugger! I would buy it in an instant. Doctor Who is very popular, and the music stands out as gorgeous, so why not profit and please the fans? It bewilders me. Is there a rights issue being worked out? 3245:

And finally, for the dated material at the end, should that also have some parenthetical statement as I mentioned above, indicating the time period in which the stated statistics were true, as apposed to actually including all the data up to the

2598:

I've seen the episode Rise of the Cybermen recently in my country, and this discussion about the existence of a parallel seems out of place for me. So I went to the article of that episode and I copy this fragment from the Continuity section:

1861:

Let's not forget that the Daleks of the Order of Skaro were all fitted with personality in order to conjour up ways to defeat their enemies, although it doesn't fit the tone, a sense of humour no matter how twisted would be a by-product of

3236:"...the Doctor's farewell to Rose, was filmed on 16 January 2006 ... Piper's last scene was Rose's reunion with the Doctor in "The Satan Pit" on 31 March, but the shoot was rather emotional, to the point there were several tears on set." 3128:

now suffers any hasty revisionist intervention to expunge its Continuity section too. Let's hope not; we wouldn't want to risk the article losing featured status by changing the status quo in support of somebody's fatuous argument here.

1898:

at all, but its still not deus ex machina - it's reasonably believable luck. Now if Rose had been sucked into the void and then miraculously spat out on the Pete's World side with no apparent explanation, THAT would be deus ex machina.

2236:

I wanted to get that kind of throbbing, sort of hurt, sound of quite emotional rock, because I thought that's Rose would do if she was hurting and ran up to her bedroom and locked herself in her room and had a good old cry, really."

1417:

Or d) the split is 'comparatively recent' - some time after airships became viable (though planes might have also evolved) - and the characters speak with the same accents in both worlds (how quickly do accents/languages drift?).

2634:

Which may be true, but "far and large" doesn't stretch to this small part of Australia, where I'd never heard of Canary Wharf. So I clicked the link labeled "Canary Wharf" and was presented with information about some building

1556:? The parallel earth in Inferno shows that Britain is technologically advanced compared to "our" world, and that Britain is a republic. Might Peteworld be a version of the Inferno earth in which they don't destroy the universe? 2025:"Bad" is indeed a correct translation of the word "dårlig" but, it's not bad as in "wicked" but as in "not good" or "inferior". "Stranden" means, as in Danish, "the beach". If one should follow the line of the translation of 1068:

It sounds like a somewhat uptempo version of Flavia's theme, although in none of the materials I've seen has anybody identified it as such. If you want to hear it for yourself it's currently being played on the official site

1882:

This was a great episode, it actually made me cry. But I don't get how Mr. Tyler would know exactly when and where to jump to the other Earth just in time to catch and save Rose. Is it worth pointing this out somewhere?

3290:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110713005614/http://uk.tv.ign.com/index/reviews.html?constraint.floor.article.overall_rating=10&constraint.return_all=is_true&sort.attribute=article.overall_rating&sort.order=desc

2312:

It's not really a plot hole since it doesn't affect the plot. It's more like a rabbit out of a hat (or a slight deus ex machina) in that it's there to save the heroine from death. It's like what happened at the end of

1247:

its operations are secret and involve aliens. There's not really any evidence for any theory, but I'm just trying to illustrate that there are plenty of other ways it could have been set up that are nothing to do with

153: 2924:

OK, I see the comment immediately above. But this article is for a general audience, not Doctor Who buffs, so if Doctor Who has "idiosyncratic" naming convention then this should be properly documented and linked to.

3293: 3423: 2780:

I watched it just now, and it's pretty clear that only Dalek Caan escaped through the emergency temporal shift, just before it sucks in the ark. I believe he's the only one of the four that shows up in a later

3192:

and a two inch thick wire rope separating existence from oblivion, your efforts to ensure that only your interpretation of Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines shall prevail are breathtaking. Absolutely astonishing.

2850:

I have added an explanation of what the Fear Factor is, as well as that the Fear Factor website does not have a fear rating as per the beginning of the sentence, which describes them not being allowed to see

2212: 2539:

Sorry if it seems that I'm being difficult. But it doesn't make sense to have two returning companions to be labelled differently, just because one of the actors isn't labelled as a star of the episode.

2945:

I know she was credited as "The Bride" at the end of the episode but for the sake of purpose and just generally to be less confusing to those who don't know, why not just have Catherine Tate listed as

2240:

Above is the quote made by Murray Gold, copied exactly as it appears in the article. It needs correcting as it does not make sense (possibly vandalism??) Does anyone know what this is supposed to say?

1011: 905: 3418: 1478:

It's in rose's stolen lab coat, which she threw on the sphere room floor, or alternitivly in Singh's coat. Either way, he probebly noticed it was gone when he checked his coat, and went back for it.

1680:

Three people (Rose, Jackie and Mickey) from our-universe reside in parallel universe, and the Cybermen and others crossed in the reverse direction - so there is a possibility of it happening again.

351: 233: 2354:

Seeing as Rose is counted as a companion for her role in "Turn Left" and Martha is counted as one in "Sontaran Strategem"/"Poison Sky", Mickey should be counted as one for these this two-parter.

1912:

I agree Pete's timing could have been luck, but he materialises with his arms outstretched. Unless people jumping dimensions can see the world for a second before they actually materialise?

2103:, and therefore anything described in this story, "cracks in between universes", can reasonably be applied to the first story, "cracks in between universes" (unless stated otherwise). 1225:

Also remember that, in universe, Torchwood was named after the house, not after the Doctor, so there'd be nothing particularly counter-intuitive to the people in the story about it. --

332: 3294:

http://uk.tv.ign.com/index/reviews.html?constraint.floor.article.overall_rating=10&constraint.return_all=is_true&sort.attribute=article.overall_rating&sort.order=desc

1143:

date, we felt we'd tell you as soon as possible. Thanks to everyone for the deluge of emails about the "singy lady", the "beach thing (i cried)", and, of course, the theme." --

147: 258: 3473: 1016: 3351: 3347: 3333: 1383:'s point that he was simply using speculation to demonstrate how much speculating could actually be done, and hence why it shouldn't be included in the main article. -- 3188:] coming. Oh, hang on a second. I take my hat off to you, Sir. Like watching an aerialist above the Grand Canyon leaping from foot to foot, with only a well-placed 3221:

should this read like the others with the use of "regular appearance" since she returns for the "Turn Left" trilogy? Or is that covered by "lead" companion role?

2057:

This is original research. It is possible that in removing this paragraph I have removed material that, shorn of the speculation, might belong in the article. --

1944:(Another spoiler warning, but as noted above it probably doesn't matter) I think it is a notable continuity fact that this is the first episode in the history of 1171:

No, it does not confirm the existence of the Doctor. Just as the existence of Rose Tyler in 'this' universe did not confirm her existence in the alternate one. --

992: 520: 3478: 2631:

It is said by the person that reverted my change that "it's emphatically One Canada Square, which is known to the public far and large as Canary Wharf (Tower)"

2562:

but he plays just as much the part of The Doctor's companion as Rose does. It seems right that he should be credited as a companion on this particular episode.

44: 79: 1570:

That would mean there are two doctors, since from at every point of divergence those who led alternate time lines exist independently in the other universe.

3468: 3463: 3438: 2885:

On the series issue, the 2006 series is commonly known as series 2, whereas the 1964 series is known as season 2. It's an idiosyncratic practice unique to

982: 510: 2029:, it would be "Stygge ulv bukten" or, more grammatically sound, "Styggeulvsbukten" (although "slem", as Andrew suggest, is certainly a good alternative). 1613:) and in some way or another inspire the creation of alternate Torchwood the same way the doctor did in (our?) universe, maybe a crossover with the new 1327:

allow speculation, there are plenty of ways that Torchwood could have been founded that don't involve a parallel Doctor. That's why, 67.5.147.88, we

1716:

TV series producers can #always# find a way out of reviving dead or "parked elsewhere" characters if needs be - see the patron saint of such events,

3483: 3299: 1634:

I remember a report mentioning Billie's desire to play the Doctor or see a female Doctor too, but I don't remember where. That's bugging me now. :)

1552:

Yes, yes, speculation isn't appropriate on wikipedia talk pages, and so on - but is it worth noting the previous appearance of a parallel earth in

954: 486: 85: 3094:

while I'm at it, in case anybody missed it the first time. Is that standard practice when addressing an IP editor now? Must have missed the memo.

824: 3413: 1038:

Does anyone have any information on the music for the final reunion scene on Bad Wolf Bay? The one with the female warbling and the piano going

958: 629: 1104:

was specially composed by Murray Gold. We've still no news of a soundtrack album." Shame. I'd buy it too. It's my ringtone at the moment. :-) --

2399:

Neither were Rose or Martha in the episodes mentioned above. And neither was Jack in "The Empty Child", nor Astrid in "Voyage of the Damned".

3458: 3433: 3428: 3194: 3130: 3095: 3082: 2984: 2795:

OK, after further investigation, it appears I was wrong, although we do only see one of them trigger the temporal shift. I've edited my edit.

2657: 3448: 3183:

Yes, I'm sure it's easy for little things like actuality slip by in the rush to make grandiloquent claims. As to the result, I did not see

619: 190: 30: 1319:

I hope you'll forgive me for saying so, but you don't make it clear what 'speculation' you refer to. I hope you're not complaining about

759: 2612: 1793:

I know, but they are attacking each other, and from the Daleks POV, this would be just pest control, compared with what they've fought.

1534: 945: 900: 482: 481:

and its spin-offs on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the

471: 432: 785: 99: 3453: 1985: 1161:

mystique quality that makes it rather counter intuitive for an alternate purpose in the alternate reality of an institute so-named)

2713: 104: 20: 168: 3229:

should there be an addition of "at the time of the initial publication of this article", or, "the time of the episodes release"?

1817: 1780: 809: 2907:"Doomsday" is the thirteenth and final episode in the second series of the British science fiction television series Doctor Who" 1591:

Mentioning there was a parallel Earth also in Inferno would probably be okay for the Trivia section. Are there other instances?

1341:

fall under speculation, besides being very tentative; but story line contradiction could always be added to the trivia section.

135: 74: 691: 407: 3443: 3119: 742: 228: 65: 2752: 2710: 3394: 2830:"he didn't know when asked by Collinson on the commentary," (para 3) - what is the commentary that is being referred to? 770: 734: 3022:

featured episode article, which this article happens to be; including it will risk this article losing featured status.

641: 591: 582: 543: 129: 251: 2863: 2339: 1323:

speculation, because if you are, you've missed the point of it rather. I was just trying to illustrate that if we

185: 2707: 2676:

that building, while being referred to as "the battle of Canary Wharf", it is reasonable to link to the building.

1953:. Before I add this, however, I thought I'd ask if anyone knows of another occasion, in case my memory is faulty. 1052:

If it's slow and solemn, it's possibly Flavia's theme (or a variation). It's used when thinks get too time-lordy.

853: 109: 3300:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080421200137/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com:80/show/doctor_who/doomsday_2.php

795: 3350:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1422: 1404: 1363: 1165: 199: 125: 3198: 3134: 3099: 3076: 2978: 2661: 2297:

a neutral and non-OR manner? Perhaps a reviewer has picked up on this at some point and that could be sourced?

1930: 778: 395: 218: 413: 238: 2616: 3385: 3281: 2525:

Where in the episode does it say that she is a companion? It merely says that she is a star of the episode.

1538: 841: 2653: 2608: 2335: 175: 3255: 3070: 2972: 2314: 2058: 2026: 2605:

It's obvious, Torchwood exists, although it cannot be the same organisation as it is in 'this' reality.

1926: 1661: 1618: 1561: 1503: 1449: 1270: 55: 3369:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3357: 3273: 1981: 1738: 837: 702: 24: 3280:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1577: 1460: 1342: 1289: 1226: 1186: 70: 3303: 2068: 1488: 1162: 3324: 2875: 2322: 2279: 2260: 2245: 2100: 1813: 1776: 1553: 1530: 1479: 1459:

the Long Game) if they don't want it to be a quick-fix, but then it's still there if they need it. --

791: 3051: 3015: 3011:

The concept of Daleks and Cybermen appearing together is already explored in the Production section.

2459:

He doesn't have a companion role here, and I'm not too sure about his role in Journey's End either.

2067:

comment: why is it that the Doctor is faced so many times with the choice of Rose or the universe?--

720: 242: 3045: 2951: 2563: 2198: 2171: 1913: 730: 161: 3118:

Well that didn't take long. A cursory review of Featured Doctor Who Articles immediately turns up

3088: 2990: 2955: 2567: 2122: 2090: 1967:, when Jabe says that she knows what happened to his people and she's so sorry. But I agree that 1370: 1279: 1261: 752: 204: 141: 3354:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2555: 2012: 3370: 2870:

I hope this was satisfactory; but if there are any contentious edits feel free to remove them.

3251: 3162: 3029: 2800: 2786: 2746: 2688: 2647: 2513: 2473: 2432: 2387: 1900: 1839: 1794: 1762: 1700: 1696: 1635: 1592: 1470: 1393: 1126: 1059: 937: 463: 51: 1042:

continually on the same note? Because I think it is fab, and would happily purchase it ;) --

803: 2930: 2914: 2545: 2530: 2490: 2450: 2404: 2359: 1976: 1808:

Nah, don't really buy it. I know it's a funny line, but it doesn't fit the tone, somehow. --

1723: 1686: 1419: 1401: 1397: 857: 201: 3377: 2840:

I have linked some regions which may or not be necessary, feel free to revert if necessary.

2871: 2318: 2302: 2275: 2256: 2241: 2104: 2034: 2016: 1809: 1772: 1074: 950: 2216: 2909:. "Second series"? that can't be right. The second series would have been in the 1960s. 1001: 3336:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2765: 2731: 1384: 1144: 1105: 1043: 678: 3376:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3343: 3225:"The episode is one of the most popular Doctor Who episodes since the show's revival." 2113: 1894:

That's not really deus ex machina. Pete might have just been lucky, he might not have

558: 537: 3407: 3189: 1954: 1657: 1411: 774: 726: 931: 2891: 2796: 2782: 2742: 2679: 2643: 2502: 2462: 2421: 2376: 2215:. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a 2182: 2137: 1380: 1332: 1252: 1207: 1203: 1172: 1054: 3217:"features Billie Piper's last appearance in the lead companion role as Rose Tyler" 1683:

Alternatively they end up in a third parallel universe and avoid any paradoxes...

1082:

That photo of Rose is distinctly unflattering. It looks like she has a moustache.

2180:

It's hard to shorten the plot without removing quite a bit of context, trust me.

848: 203: 3399: 3259: 3202: 3169: 3138: 3103: 3036: 2959: 2946: 2934: 2926: 2918: 2910: 2895: 2879: 2804: 2790: 2769: 2735: 2695: 2665: 2620: 2571: 2549: 2541: 2534: 2526: 2520: 2494: 2486: 2480: 2454: 2446: 2439: 2408: 2400: 2394: 2363: 2355: 2343: 2326: 2306: 2283: 2264: 2249: 2226: 2201: 2186: 2174: 2141: 2125: 2107: 2093: 2071: 2061: 2038: 2020: 2006: 1990: 1957: 1934: 1916: 1903: 1887: 1821: 1784: 1765: 1741: 1726: 1717: 1703: 1689: 1664: 1638: 1621: 1595: 1580: 1564: 1542: 1515: 1491: 1482: 1473: 1463: 1452: 1433: 1387: 1360: 1345: 1335: 1292: 1282: 1273: 1264: 1255: 1229: 1210: 1189: 1175: 1147: 1129: 1108: 1086: 1077: 1063: 1046: 953:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 2170:

articles can improve to this level before the notability inquisition comes in.

949:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge (XXG) articles about 3342:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3159:

That one slipped by! It certainly wasn't there when the article was promoted.

2298: 2220: 2030: 1884: 1430: 927: 595: 574: 564: 477: 453: 1487:

Jack had psychic paper when we first saw him, so it's not a unique artefact.

2760: 2726: 2003: 2002:

least, I would expect the translation to be more like "Slemme Ulv Bugt" ...

1648:

The report was on the Newsround website. It is not on there anymore though.

1083: 766: 2255:

Makes more sense without the typo -- it's probably "quiet emotional rock".

1838:

At least I asked on the discussion page before putting it in the article.

457: 447: 426: 748: 706: 2219:. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, 1400:'s parallel universes - are there any more examples of such multiples? 833: 586:, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the 1709:

Just parking a few ideas - rather than getting involved in the Dr Who

921: 894: 3062:

I will take your comment that a Continuity section doesn't appear in

1710: 2213:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force

3304:

http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/doctor_who/doomsday_2.php

1879:(spoiler warning, though at this point i don't know if it matters) 1677:

The Doctor says that they cannot meet again - for the second time.

1070: 1269:

Sure it belongs here, haven't you ever read a talk page before?--

2485:

Martha doesn't have a companion role in "Sontaran Strategem".

2159: 2099:

It's not complete speculation in that this is a sequel to the

864: 698: 587: 389: 205: 15: 3309:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

1000: 475:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 3044:

The Continuity section wasn't added by me, it was added by

829:

Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible

3424:

Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once

3284:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1443:

The Doctor never does get his psychic paper back, does he?

709:

to Good Article status following previous reviews, create

594:

where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the

485:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1359:

Besides... speculation is half the fun with Doctor Who. -

2166:

Still, it's fine apart from that, and I hope other such

1660:

break into his natural accent during the goodbye scene?

257:

This article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as

3277: 2756: 2373:

far. Mickey was not a traveling companion in Doomsday.

711: 667: 662: 657: 652: 344: 325: 306: 287: 2724:

discussion? If not, the subsection should be removed.

2558:

on this one. I wouldn't credit him as a companion for

2135:

Moot point, the continuity part has been reorganised.

2114:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:No_original_research

765:

Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance:

160: 3419:

Featured articles that have appeared on the main page

2639:

Canary Wharf, rather than about Canary Wharf itself.

590:. If you would like to participate, please visit the 2163:, who reviewed every season two and three episode). 1771:

That's not the scene that uses that line, though. --

3346:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2817:During the opyedit a few things came to light that 2081:I propose the next item is removed from "The Void" 1496:There's probably a whole ream of it in the TARDIS. 174: 2996:for a third time today for the following reasons: 3014:Continuity sections are generally discouraged by 2414:one episode does not make it a companion in all 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2969:I have removed the Continuity section added by 2864:List_of_Doctor_Who_serials#Season 2 (1964–1965) 2594:Existence of Torchwood in the alternate reality 957:. To improve this article, please refer to the 3332:This message was posted before February 2018. 3026:Please do not make me revert a fourth time... 2627:Link to "Canary Wharf" or "One Canada Square". 1611:something found by alternate Torchwood maybe? 1331:allow such speculation on the main article. 1155: 8: 241:. Even so, if you can update or improve it, 237:as one of the best articles produced by the 231:; it (or a previous version of it) has been 2211:This article has been reviewed as part of 2011:Google translates it as bad wolf beach... 889: 715:(in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary) 686:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 637: 532: 421: 266: 213: 3272:I have just modified 2 external links on 1278:In that it doesn't help the article, no. 3474:Mid-importance Episode coverage articles 2706:This section does not have any cites to 393: 2845:Broadcast and pre-airing media blackout 2758:Thank you very much, most appreciated, 891: 534: 423: 1754:This is not war, this is pest control! 1379:Notwithstanding all that, I also take 967:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Television 495:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Doctor Who 3321:to let others know (documentation at 3241:characters. Though i could be wrong. 2048:I've remove the following paragraph: 1617:series? but that's idle speculation-- 580:This article is within the scope of 7: 3479:Episode coverage task force articles 2317:. Chalk it up to artistic licence. 1971:is the first time we see the Doctor 943:This article is within the scope of 469:This article is within the scope of 2157:too, and there are no reviews (eg. 1975:, and that's probably noteworthy. — 1732:For the love of god prune the plot! 729:- references and general clean-up, 412:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3469:FA-Class Episode coverage articles 3464:Low-importance television articles 3439:Mid-importance Doctor Who articles 3059:an exception rather than the rule. 1260:Speculation does not belong here. 867:following improvements to article. 14: 3414:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles 3276:. Please take a moment to review 2084:Because it is quite speculative. 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 930: 920: 893: 677: 567: 557: 536: 456: 446: 425: 394: 250: 217: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3484:WikiProject Television articles 2292:Plot Hole, no wait - Plot CHASM 1012:the Episode coverage task force 987:This article has been rated as 970:Template:WikiProject Television 624:This article has been rated as 604:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject BBC 515:This article has been rated as 498:Template:WikiProject Doctor Who 3048:. Please get your facts right. 2776:All Skaros or just Dalek Caan? 2642:Perhaps the link(s) should be 1071:http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho 825:BBC articles without infoboxes 294: 1: 3400:19:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC) 3260:00:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC) 2805:00:14, 17 December 2010 (UTC) 2791:00:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC) 2696:23:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 2666:23:21, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 2621:00:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 2227:00:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2202:21:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1991:18:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1958:14:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1904:14:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1888:13:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1699:rather than wikipedia??? :-) 1656:Is it my imagination or does 1009:This article is supported by 712:BBC Computer Literacy Project 42:Put new text under old text. 3459:FA-Class television articles 3434:FA-Class Doctor Who articles 3429:Old requests for peer review 2672:Since the whole plot is set 2187:18:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 2175:17:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 2142:15:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2126:14:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2108:19:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 2094:17:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 1917:14:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 1543:23:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 771:BBC World Service Television 737:- unreferenced and confusing 735:BBC World Service Television 3449:Low-importance BBC articles 3203:19:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 3170:09:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 3139:08:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 3104:17:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC) 3037:09:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC) 2770:21:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 2736:21:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 2720:sources give this material 1822:06:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 1785:12:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 1766:11:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 1742:19:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 1414:22:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 3500: 3363:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3269:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2960:00:44, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 2702:Continuity section problem 2572:00:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 2197:OK, the renom has passed. 1963:He sheds a single tear in 1156:Pete's World's "Torchwood" 1040:plink... plink... plink... 993:project's importance scale 820:*Restructure the category 733:- over-detailed and long, 630:project's importance scale 521:project's importance scale 352:Featured article candidate 2550:01:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC) 2535:23:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2521:23:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2495:21:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2481:21:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2455:21:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2440:21:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2409:17:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2395:15:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2364:15:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2344:14:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 2232:Quote does not make sense 2072:22:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2062:10:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 2039:19:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 2007:03:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1727:16:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1704:22:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1690:22:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1665:20:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1639:01:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1622:19:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1596:01:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1581:19:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1565:18:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1516:20:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1492:19:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1483:21:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1474:16:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1464:09:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1453:04:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1434:14:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 1423:21:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 1405:22:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1388:06:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1364:03:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1346:19:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1336:18:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1293:01:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1283:11:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1274:11:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1265:08:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1256:08:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1230:08:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1211:07:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1190:07:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1176:02:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1166:21:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 1148:16:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 1130:16:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1109:17:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 1087:23:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 1078:22:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 1064:21:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 1047:21:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 1008: 986: 915: 636: 623: 552: 514: 441: 420: 376: 313: 269: 265: 239:Knowledge (XXG) community 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3454:WikiProject BBC articles 3000:It does not connect any 2935:02:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2919:02:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2896:21:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2880:17:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 2499:Again... accreditation. 2327:20:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 2307:19:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 2284:16:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 2265:16:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 2250:13:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 2021:20:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 1935:08:48, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 779:BBC Two Northern Ireland 607:Template:WikiProject BBC 367:Featured topic candidate 259:Today's featured article 3265:External links modified 1695:Doesn't this belong on 842:Coat of arms of the BBC 810:Stub-Class BBC articles 2445:same with Sarah Jane. 2369:That is stretching it 2027:Little Red Riding Hood 1875:Plot (deus ex machina) 1396:appears in several of 1005: 946:WikiProject Television 472:WikiProject Doctor Who 402:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 3444:FA-Class BBC articles 3274:Doomsday (Doctor Who) 3018:, and not present in 3008:to any other episode. 2554:I have to agree with 2315:The Doctor's Daughter 1004: 961:for the type of work. 823:Add infoboxes to the 703:BBC News (TV channel) 406:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 225:Doomsday (Doctor Who) 100:Neutral point of view 25:Doomsday (Doctor Who) 3344:regular verification 3208:In Need of Updating? 2941:Donna as "The Bride" 2077:complete speculation 1997:Dårlig Ulv Stranden? 1965:The End of the World 1940:Fact check requested 1652:Goodbye Scene Accent 792:Criticism of the BBC 644:for WikiProject BBC: 314:Good article nominee 295:Good article nominee 105:No original research 3334:After February 2018 3313:parameter below to 3046:User talk:Danniesen 2741:Update: Removed by 2350:Mickey as companion 1951:Parting of the Ways 973:television articles 955:join the discussion 951:television programs 731:Pebble Mill Studios 501:Doctor Who articles 3388:InternetArchiveBot 3339:InternetArchiveBot 2810:Copyedit July 2011 2044:Parallel Torchwood 1673:Parallel Universes 1469:Time Lord spans). 1006: 832:Add references to 753:Broadcasting House 408:content assessment 270:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 3364: 3121:Partners in Crime 2714:secondary sources 2656:comment added by 2611:comment added by 1989: 1697:Outpost Gallifrey 1031: 1030: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1022: 938:Television portal 888: 887: 884: 883: 880: 879: 876: 875: 531: 530: 527: 526: 464:Doctor Who portal 388: 387: 384: 383: 326:December 19, 2007 307:November 14, 2007 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3491: 3398: 3389: 3362: 3361: 3340: 3328: 3168: 3165: 3126:Patners in Crime 3093: 3092: 3073: 3035: 3032: 2995: 2994: 2975: 2821:need attention: 2694: 2691: 2668: 2623: 2519: 2516: 2510: 2479: 2476: 2470: 2438: 2435: 2429: 2393: 2390: 2384: 2336:Alienturnedhuman 2224: 2207:GA Sweeps (Pass) 1979: 1514: 1510: 1502: 1398:Michael Moorcock 975: 974: 971: 968: 965: 959:style guidelines 940: 935: 934: 924: 917: 916: 911: 908: 906:Episode coverage 897: 890: 714: 692:Article requests 681: 674: 673: 638: 612: 611: 608: 605: 602: 577: 572: 571: 570: 561: 554: 553: 548: 540: 533: 503: 502: 499: 496: 493: 466: 461: 460: 450: 443: 442: 437: 429: 422: 405: 399: 398: 390: 379:Featured article 377:Current status: 347: 345:January 27, 2008 328: 309: 290: 288:November 2, 2007 267: 261:on July 8, 2011. 254: 229:featured article 221: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3499: 3498: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3404: 3403: 3392: 3387: 3355: 3348:have permission 3338: 3322: 3282:this simple FaQ 3267: 3242: 3230: 3222: 3210: 3195:109.158.123.179 3163: 3160: 3131:109.158.123.179 3096:109.158.123.179 3074: 3071:109.158.123.179 3069: 3068: 3030: 3027: 2976: 2973:109.158.123.179 2971: 2970: 2967: 2943: 2904: 2812: 2778: 2704: 2689: 2677: 2658:220.235.106.169 2651: 2629: 2606: 2596: 2514: 2503: 2500: 2474: 2463: 2460: 2433: 2422: 2419: 2388: 2377: 2374: 2352: 2294: 2238: 2234: 2222: 2209: 2195: 2154: 2128: 2079: 2046: 1999: 1942: 1877: 1749: 1734: 1675: 1654: 1550: 1512: 1504: 1497: 1445: 1158: 1036: 972: 969: 966: 963: 962: 936: 929: 909: 903: 872: 710: 672: 609: 606: 603: 600: 599: 583:WikiProject BBC 573: 568: 566: 546: 500: 497: 494: 491: 490: 462: 455: 435: 403: 343: 324: 305: 286: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3497: 3495: 3487: 3486: 3481: 3476: 3471: 3466: 3461: 3456: 3451: 3446: 3441: 3436: 3431: 3426: 3421: 3416: 3406: 3405: 3382: 3381: 3374: 3307: 3306: 3298:Added archive 3296: 3288:Added archive 3266: 3263: 3248: 3247: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3232:Other things: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3209: 3206: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3060: 3049: 3024: 3023: 3012: 3009: 2966: 2963: 2942: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2903: 2902:Second series? 2900: 2899: 2898: 2868: 2867: 2858: 2857: 2853: 2852: 2847: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2811: 2808: 2777: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2628: 2625: 2595: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2537: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2330: 2329: 2293: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2268: 2267: 2235: 2233: 2230: 2208: 2205: 2199:Alientraveller 2194: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2172:Alientraveller 2153: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2078: 2075: 2055: 2054: 2045: 2042: 2013:Andrew Marsden 1998: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1941: 1938: 1927:LeoStarDragon1 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1914:Damiancorrigan 1907: 1906: 1876: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1788: 1787: 1758: 1757: 1748: 1745: 1733: 1730: 1707: 1706: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1662:Matthew Platts 1653: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1619:71.247.243.152 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1584: 1583: 1572: 1571: 1562:Matthew Platts 1549: 1548:Parallel Earth 1546: 1529:It returns in 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1450:71.247.243.152 1444: 1441: 1437: 1436: 1391: 1390: 1377: 1375: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1271:71.247.107.146 1249:Tooth and Claw 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1179: 1178: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1017:Mid-importance 1007: 997: 996: 989:Low-importance 985: 979: 978: 976: 942: 941: 925: 913: 912: 910:Low‑importance 898: 886: 885: 882: 881: 878: 877: 874: 873: 871: 870: 869: 868: 861: 844: 830: 827: 812: 799: 781: 755: 738: 716: 685: 683: 682: 671: 670: 665: 660: 655: 649: 646: 645: 634: 633: 626:Low-importance 622: 616: 615: 613: 579: 578: 562: 550: 549: 547:Low‑importance 541: 529: 528: 525: 524: 517:Mid-importance 513: 507: 506: 504: 468: 467: 451: 439: 438: 436:Mid‑importance 430: 418: 417: 411: 400: 386: 385: 382: 381: 374: 373: 370: 363: 362:March 18, 2008 359: 358: 355: 348: 340: 339: 336: 329: 321: 320: 317: 310: 302: 301: 298: 291: 283: 282: 279: 276: 272: 271: 263: 262: 255: 247: 246: 222: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3496: 3485: 3482: 3480: 3477: 3475: 3472: 3470: 3467: 3465: 3462: 3460: 3457: 3455: 3452: 3450: 3447: 3445: 3442: 3440: 3437: 3435: 3432: 3430: 3427: 3425: 3422: 3420: 3417: 3415: 3412: 3411: 3409: 3402: 3401: 3396: 3391: 3390: 3379: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3359: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3335: 3330: 3326: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3270: 3264: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3244: 3243: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3224: 3223: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3207: 3205: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3191: 3187: 3186: 3171: 3166: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3090: 3087: 3084: 3081: 3078: 3072: 3065: 3061: 3058: 3053: 3050: 3047: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3033: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3010: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2992: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2974: 2964: 2962: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2948: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2901: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2888: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2865: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2854: 2849: 2848: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2820: 2815: 2809: 2807: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2793: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2757: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2712: 2709: 2701: 2697: 2692: 2686: 2685: 2683: 2675: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2649: 2645: 2640: 2638: 2632: 2626: 2624: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2613:84.79.136.171 2610: 2603: 2600: 2593: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2560:Arm of Ghosts 2557: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2538: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2517: 2511: 2509: 2507: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2477: 2471: 2469: 2467: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2436: 2430: 2428: 2426: 2417: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2391: 2385: 2383: 2381: 2372: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2332: 2331: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2291: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2231: 2229: 2228: 2225: 2218: 2214: 2206: 2204: 2203: 2200: 2192: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2173: 2169: 2164: 2162: 2161: 2151: 2143: 2140: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2127: 2124: 2123:Robin.lemstra 2115: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2091:Robin.lemstra 2088: 2085: 2082: 2076: 2074: 2073: 2070: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2043: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2009: 2008: 2005: 1996: 1992: 1987: 1983: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1956: 1952: 1947: 1939: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1905: 1902: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1880: 1874: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1796: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1764: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1739:83.151.197.97 1731: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1721: 1719: 1714: 1712: 1705: 1702: 1701:quercus robur 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1681: 1678: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1666: 1663: 1659: 1658:David Tennant 1651: 1649: 1640: 1637: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1623: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1597: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1563: 1557: 1555: 1547: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1535:147.70.242.40 1532: 1517: 1511: 1509: 1508: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1472: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1451: 1442: 1440: 1439:Nicely said! 1435: 1432: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1415: 1413: 1412:User:Moriarty 1407: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1362: 1347: 1344: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1294: 1291: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1280:GraemeLeggett 1277: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1262:GraemeLeggett 1259: 1258: 1257: 1254: 1250: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1212: 1209: 1205: 1202:I agree with 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1191: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1149: 1146: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1110: 1107: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1088: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1041: 1033: 1018: 1015:(assessed as 1014: 1013: 1003: 999: 998: 994: 990: 984: 981: 980: 977: 960: 956: 952: 948: 947: 939: 933: 928: 926: 923: 919: 918: 914: 907: 902: 899: 896: 892: 866: 862: 859: 855: 851: 850: 845: 843: 839: 835: 831: 828: 826: 822: 821: 819: 817: 813: 811: 808: 806: 805: 800: 797: 793: 790: 788: 787: 782: 780: 776: 775:BBC Lifestyle 772: 768: 764: 762: 761: 756: 754: 750: 747: 745: 744: 739: 736: 732: 728: 727:Chucklevision 725: 723: 722: 717: 713: 708: 704: 700: 696: 694: 693: 688: 687: 684: 680: 676: 675: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 654: 651: 650: 648: 647: 643: 640: 639: 635: 631: 627: 621: 618: 617: 614: 597: 593: 589: 585: 584: 576: 565: 563: 560: 556: 555: 551: 545: 542: 539: 535: 522: 518: 512: 509: 508: 505: 488: 484: 480: 479: 474: 473: 465: 459: 454: 452: 449: 445: 444: 440: 434: 431: 428: 424: 419: 415: 409: 401: 397: 392: 391: 380: 375: 371: 369: 368: 364: 361: 360: 356: 354: 353: 349: 346: 342: 341: 337: 335: 334: 330: 327: 323: 322: 318: 316: 315: 311: 308: 304: 303: 299: 297: 296: 292: 289: 285: 284: 280: 277: 274: 273: 268: 264: 260: 256: 253: 249: 248: 244: 240: 236: 235: 230: 226: 223: 220: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3386: 3383: 3358:source check 3337: 3331: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3308: 3271: 3268: 3252:SpeakNSpirit 3249: 3231: 3211: 3184: 3182: 3125: 3120: 3085: 3079: 3063: 3056: 3025: 3019: 3005: 3001: 2987: 2981: 2968: 2944: 2906: 2905: 2890: 2886: 2869: 2818: 2816: 2813: 2794: 2779: 2759: 2749: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2705: 2681: 2680: 2673: 2644:Canary Wharf 2641: 2636: 2633: 2630: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2559: 2505: 2504: 2465: 2464: 2424: 2423: 2415: 2379: 2378: 2370: 2353: 2295: 2239: 2217:Good article 2210: 2196: 2181: 2167: 2165: 2158: 2155: 2136: 2089: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2065: 2059:Tony Sidaway 2056: 2047: 2024: 2010: 2000: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1950: 1945: 1943: 1923: 1901:GracieLizzie 1895: 1881: 1878: 1862:personality. 1759: 1753: 1735: 1722: 1715: 1708: 1685: 1682: 1679: 1676: 1668: 1655: 1647: 1636:TransUtopian 1614: 1610: 1593:TransUtopian 1578:67.5.147.136 1558: 1551: 1528: 1506: 1505: 1498: 1471:TransUtopian 1461:86.144.60.11 1446: 1438: 1416: 1408: 1392: 1358: 1343:67.5.147.136 1328: 1324: 1320: 1290:71.139.18.66 1248: 1227:86.144.60.11 1187:67.5.157.236 1159: 1127:TransUtopian 1053: 1039: 1037: 1010: 988: 944: 858:See comments 854:Good article 847: 815: 814: 802: 801: 796:See comments 784: 783: 758: 757: 741: 740: 719: 718: 690: 689: 625: 610:BBC articles 592:project page 581: 516: 483:project page 476: 470: 414:WikiProjects 378: 372:Not promoted 365: 350: 331: 312: 293: 243:please do so 232: 224: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3325:Sourcecheck 2947:Donna Noble 2722:significant 2708:independent 2652:—Preceding 2607:—Preceding 2112:It's still 2069:84.68.45.78 1977:Josiah Rowe 1747:New caption 1724:Jackiespeel 1718:Bobby Ewing 1687:Jackiespeel 1489:84.69.0.192 1420:Jackiespeel 1402:Jackiespeel 1163:67.5.147.88 1060:message me! 333:Peer review 148:free images 31:not a forum 3408:Categories 3395:Report bug 3052:WP:WHO/MOS 3016:WP:WHO/MOS 2965:Continuity 2887:Doctor Who 2872:Chaosdruid 2825:Conception 2418:episodes. 2319:DonQuixote 2276:DonQuixote 2257:DonQuixote 2242:yettie0711 2168:Doctor Who 2105:DonQuixote 1946:Doctor Who 1810:khaosworks 1773:khaosworks 1737:for word. 1501:murrayinch 1480:84.69.2.42 1075:MisterHand 964:Television 901:Television 849:Dad's Army 838:assessment 596:BBC Portal 575:BBC portal 492:Doctor Who 487:discussion 478:Doctor Who 433:Doctor Who 300:Not listed 234:identified 3378:this tool 3371:this tool 3004:from the 2718:secondary 2716:. Do any 2152:GA review 1615:Torchwood 1385:DudeGalea 1145:DudeGalea 1106:DudeGalea 863:Reassess 767:BBC Japan 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3384:Cheers.— 3246:present? 3190:plimsole 3083:contribs 3057:Doomsday 2985:contribs 2956:BionicMK 2952:BionicMK 2781:episode. 2753:contribs 2711:reliable 2654:unsigned 2609:unsigned 2568:BionicMK 2564:BionicMK 1986:contribs 1969:Doomsday 1955:23skidoo 1818:contribs 1781:contribs 1531:Series 3 1394:Tanelorn 1369:I think 749:BBC News 743:Copyedit 707:BBC News 697:Improve 404:FA-class 357:Promoted 338:Reviewed 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3311:checked 3278:my edit 3161:-- ] {{ 3028:-- ] {{ 2892:Sceptre 2835:Filming 2743:Sceptre 1554:Inferno 1381:RobbieG 1333:RobbieG 1253:RobbieG 1208:Liyster 1204:Kwekubo 1173:Kwekubo 1084:Vitriol 991:on the 846:Return 834:Goa Mix 721:Cleanup 658:history 628:on the 519:on the 278:Process 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3319:failed 2927:Adpete 2911:Adpete 2684:dokter 2556:Ophois 2542:Ophois 2527:Ophois 2508:dokter 2487:Ophois 2468:dokter 2447:Ophois 2427:dokter 2401:Ophois 2382:dokter 2371:really 2356:Ophois 1840:Comics 1795:Comics 1763:Comics 1711:fanfic 1371:Graeme 1361:Neural 1073:). -- 1044:Harris 840:) and 760:Expand 410:scale. 319:Listed 281:Result 126:Google 3089:WHOIS 3002:event 2991:WHOIS 2648:Tower 2416:other 2299:U-Mos 2101:first 2031:Pilum 1896:known 1885:Corby 1842:(UTC) 1797:(UTC) 1431:The_B 1329:can't 1034:Music 852:to a 836:(see 816:Other 804:Stubs 668:purge 663:watch 642:Tasks 227:is a 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3315:true 3256:talk 3199:talk 3185:that 3164:talk 3135:talk 3100:talk 3077:talk 3031:talk 3006:plot 2979:talk 2931:talk 2915:talk 2876:talk 2856:Lead 2801:talk 2797:Jeff 2787:talk 2783:Jeff 2766:talk 2761:Cirt 2755:) = 2747:talk 2732:talk 2727:Cirt 2690:Talk 2662:talk 2650:). 2617:talk 2546:talk 2531:talk 2515:Talk 2491:talk 2475:Talk 2451:talk 2434:Talk 2405:talk 2389:Talk 2360:talk 2340:talk 2323:talk 2303:talk 2280:talk 2261:talk 2246:talk 2223:ASEM 2193:Pass 2183:Will 2138:Will 2035:talk 2017:talk 2004:Daen 1982:talk 1973:weep 1931:talk 1814:talk 1777:talk 1539:talk 1513:ster 1448:is-- 1055:Will 786:NPOV 705:and 653:edit 275:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3352:RfC 3329:). 3317:or 3302:to 3292:to 3064:any 3020:any 2851:it. 2819:may 2814:Hi 2160:IGN 983:Low 865:BBC 856:. ( 699:BBC 620:Low 601:BBC 588:BBC 544:BBC 511:Mid 176:TWL 3410:: 3365:. 3360:}} 3356:{{ 3327:}} 3323:{{ 3258:) 3250:-- 3201:) 3167:}} 3137:) 3102:) 3034:}} 2958:) 2933:) 2917:) 2889:. 2878:) 2803:) 2789:) 2768:) 2734:) 2693:• 2687:• 2678:— 2674:in 2664:) 2637:IN 2619:) 2570:) 2548:) 2533:) 2518:• 2512:• 2501:— 2493:) 2478:• 2472:• 2461:— 2453:) 2437:• 2431:• 2420:— 2407:) 2392:• 2386:• 2375:— 2362:) 2342:) 2325:) 2305:) 2282:) 2263:) 2248:) 2116::: 2037:) 2019:) 1984:• 1933:) 1899:-- 1890:) 1820:) 1816:• 1783:) 1779:• 1720:. 1713:. 1541:) 1533:. 1325:do 1321:my 1251:. 1062:) 1019:). 904:: 777:, 773:, 769:, 751:, 701:, 156:) 54:; 3397:) 3393:( 3380:. 3373:. 3254:( 3197:( 3133:( 3098:( 3091:) 3086:· 3080:· 3075:( 2993:) 2988:· 2982:· 2977:( 2954:( 2929:( 2913:( 2874:( 2866:. 2799:( 2785:( 2764:( 2750:· 2745:( 2730:( 2682:E 2660:( 2646:( 2615:( 2566:( 2544:( 2529:( 2506:E 2489:( 2466:E 2449:( 2425:E 2403:( 2380:E 2358:( 2338:( 2321:( 2301:( 2278:( 2259:( 2244:( 2221:M 2033:( 2015:( 1988:) 1980:( 1929:( 1883:( 1812:( 1775:( 1756:" 1752:" 1609:( 1537:( 1507:e 1499:s 1069:( 1058:( 995:. 860:) 818:: 807:: 798:) 794:( 789:: 763:: 746:: 724:: 695:: 632:. 598:. 523:. 489:. 416:: 245:. 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index