Knowledge

Talk:Data science

Source đź“ť

1637:
does not mention the term "data science" at all. Rather it says he defined "e-Science" and "data-driven science". These specifically refer to the use of big data in academic research Science, as in, using big data technologies for astronomy, chemistry, biology etc. The vast bulk of self-described "Data Scientists" today do not work in academic science. They use the "science" in "data science" to mean a particularly methodology they employ, as in "philosophy of science", rather than to refer to the set of academic sciences such as astronomy and biology. They work in commercial fields like search engine and social network prediction rather than in "Science". So maybe we should split this into two articles, one about the current commercial profession of Data Science, as conceived by most self-describing Data Scientists, and a second one about data-driven science or "e-science" as conceived by Grey and others? They are not the same subject, maybe that's a reason why the article has been so confused and people are arguing over it?
994: 1584:
concepts with the mush that waffles about the continental ones). The "fourth paradigm of science" -- reminds me of the old 1990s maxim "whenever you hear 'new paradigm', put away your wallet" ! So can we find and describe some serious definitions of Data Science as a field to replace this mess of advertising and hype ? I have made a start with '"Data Science" has been defined as "the passive reuse of data collected for other purposes" in contrast to both "real science" in which the experimenter causes some of the data to occur and can thus make causal inferences' as defined in (Fox 2018, chapter 1), what do we think to this ?
2782: 1165: 797: 776: 893: 883: 2958: 865: 1550:
model random variations in the "speed of time"? For example, in modelling growth in adolescence, not all people experience the typical burst of growth at the same age; this can be modelled through time warping, and randomness in a Lie Algebra becomes a core concept. Time warping is one the topics in studying randomness that statistician are tackling now. Different branches of mathematics model different aspects, so one need to be very careful discarding one because "it is not important".
200: 1089: 1068: 1568:
methods puts emphasis on domain-specific knowledge? I never though the concepts of localisation (mean, median) and dispersion (quantiles, standard deviation) were specific to a particular domain - and you can't get more "traditional" in statistics than those. Not to mention many other (richer) models in modern statistics that can be applied to many fields (Bayesian learning, stochastic processes, etc etc). In short: this sentence is utterly rubbish!
1099: 984: 963: 1507:
agains is a branch of mathematics and heavily used in statistics; "statistical learning" a method in statistics; "machine learning" is a subfield of computer science, again appearing on its own. If one wanted to write a structured sentence like this, one should use terms with the _same_ level of generality and scope! Someone needs to edit to fewer covering all relevant areas (If it was me I would put only "mathematics"!)
461: 261: 730: 705: 233: 1254: 384: 3215: 1443: 1394: 1337: 1296: 363: 1202: 2998: 191: 329: 2136:"However, a data scientist is most likely to be an expert in only one or two of these disciplines and proficient in another two or three" are heuristic and difficult to support without, well, data. Sentences like "good data scientists are able to apply their skills to achieve a broad spectrum of end results" are similarly unverified and are debatably normative claims. 1216: 1191: 2085:
Findings must be presented. To translate, say, "implications of trending tidal effects as measured, resulting from anomalies presented by random variance in the mean distance between the Earth and Moon" into people-speak requires a communication skill set that is essential. If decision makers do not "get it," the story big data is trying to tell could go ignored.
247: 3271: 3065: 1992:
overlapping regions arise out of the combination of their individual elements is not obvious, certainly not to an average, non-specialist reader. It may make seem like a great visual prop to you, but I think it is useless as a stand-alone image, which makes sense if it has been lifted out of a talk without any of the surrounding discussion.
2860:. I cannot quickly find a copy of this online. This paper could contribute to a Knowledge article about "data scientists", or there could be a data scientist section in this article. With data science being a career field, this topic too has heavy media coverage on degrees, particular skill sets, and working conditions. 2908:“Computer and information research scientists invent and design new approaches to computing technology and find innovative uses for existing technology.” "Explore fundamental issues in computing and develop theories and models to address those issues." "Help scientists and engineers solve complex computing problems." 2135:
The lead is somewhat chatty and editorialized; parts are intended to persuade rather than to inform. I think more authoritative sourcing would help establish what disciplines are subsumed within the field. The "buzzword" discussion is poorly cited and may not belong in the lead at all. Sentences like
1824:
Well, everybody knows that Data Science is "full of rubbish", because it is a hype. So anything but advertising language doesn't describe this subject... That is an open secret, but it will take some years for the dust to settle and usable definitions to emerge. It's not our task to add another vague
1797:
On this topic, the description “interdisciplinary field about processes and systems to extract knowledge or insights from data” is full of vague, advertising-style language, and could easily be used to describe a number of other topics, such as applied statistics or digital ethnography. If anyone can
1695:
section both on the history of the term, the buzzword bingo, and the criticism (actually, almost the entire article is about this dilemma. No need to rewrite the wheel; in particular not based on a single just-published, non-reviewed book, by an author with no reputation in data science. (And your IP
1671:
and copied the Jim Gray paradigm over there. Added further references to the modern professional definition of DS from Forbes and Udacity. We need some more up to date scholarly references then to reflect the modern community's usage -- Fox is from 2018 and happens to be what I'm currently reading,
1636:
Gray was one of the best database researchers in the world but he didn't talk about data science in the currently popular sense of the word. (He died in 2007, one year before the modern sense was invented by Facebook and LinkedIn people). The opinion article in Science magazine citied here about him
1549:
It is like writing in the biology page, a link to mammals, the kangaroo, ants, social insects, birds, dogs and Snoopy. This may see extreme, but this is what is happening in the overview. It is not a matter of readability. By the way, funny you mention Lie Algebra; did you know that it can be used to
1522:
I don't see the need to have terms of the same level of generality. Clearly, not every branch of computer science is equally important (e.g. theoretical computer science). Computer science in general is important, and data mining in particular is more important, so it is worth emphasizing. Similarly,
2708:
News has a number of interesting articles that show how statistics departments are anxious of becoming obsolete now, and therefore are rebranding themselves to data science. While computer science doesn't seem to care - they still have big data, deep learning, etc. as hypes that are uncontested, and
2312:
No, I don't think it is "overly negative". Without doubt, the entire "DS" is a big bubble right now, and it still lacks a proper definition beyond "statistics, only renamed and with more CS". The article lede shouldn't be all "we are the most sexy unicorns"; and everybody doing data science only now
1583:
Knowledge articles are a good indicator of the credibility of research fields in general. If Knowledge can't write a clear definition of what something is then it's probably a bullshit concept in the first place. (Compare, for example, Knowledge's beautiful and clear articles on analytic philosophy
2795:
This book just came out and it has a Wikimedia compatible license. Data science can be lots of things, and I think much of this book talks about data science. Most of the explicit mentions of the term "data science" are in the context of teaching data science, both in university and citizen science
2259:
I deleted the sentence on "many advocacy efforts". The reference was for the ASA that renamed a division to include the new name of DS, and as part of that charter, said it was advocating that statistics should be at the center of DS. The way it was written up in this article sounded like multiple
2170:
I have removed a comment inserted at the opening line stating that "Data Science is a buzz word" with an incendiary, non-neutral blog post from an applied statistics website as its source. Looking back at the history I noticed that the same person keeps posting this comment after it repeatedly gets
2852:
Knowledge has a challenge separating articles about academic and professional fields with the concept of careers in those fields. For example, nursing versus being a nurse. The challenge is that a large amount of media in these fields which users either want to read or want to share relates to the
1847:
Glad we are on the same page on what Data Science is. I just want to point, out, the meta description of Nazism is not “the defense of Aryan purity;” it is defined as “ideology and practice associated with the 20th-century German Nazi party and state.” I am just saying we do not necessarily define
1506:
The first sentence "Data science employs techniques and theories drawn from many fields ... " is full of terms grabbed on many articles, not well structured and with different levels of generality. For example, statistics is a branch of mathematics; "probability models" links to probability, which
2648:
My edits have been a sincere attempt to improve the quality of the entry. I am not trying to protect "data science" from criticism, let alone serve my own personal interests by doing so. So please don't use a disagreement over content as a pretext for an unsubstantiated personal attack. I'll stop
2282:
to ensure that statistics is truly at the center of data science education, research, and practice.”' and thus does show there are advocacy efforts surrounding this term. In particular, statisticians try to present themselves as the center of data science, and so do machine learners, and business
1567:
Again, in same section we have this jewell "It emphasizes the use of general methods such as machine learning that apply without changes to multiple domains. This approach differs from traditional statistics with its emphasis on domain-specific knowledge and solutions." I am in shock! Statistical
1991:
The venn diagram, as it is, is ridiculous. It has no context and has almost zero meaning without explnation. It should either be discussed in the text, at least to explain what is meant by the terms - "hacking skills" and "danger zone" seem to be the glaring examples- or removed. Exactly how the
1734:
how about a talk page vote then -- how many people think that this "Data Science" page should be about (1) Data Science qua the 2010s Silicon Valley profession in the sense of Facebook and LinkedIn's job titles; or (2) Data-driven science as defined by Jim Gray's fourth paradigm for the academic
2084:
Hi, first time chiming in. A colleague was reviewing the data science disciplines graphic with me and we agreed that proficiency in oral/written communications should get equal playing time with the other disciplines. At some point after analysis and visualization, the story needs to be told.
2246:
Seems pretty clear that data science draws heavily from statistics, but isn't the same as it, similar to the field of actuarial science. Whatever criticism you have of DS could also be applied to AS when it was first established. (Regarding Terry Speed video, tl;dw). The lede in general is
1300: 2528:
As a rule of thumb on a overhyped topic like this: if the authors are widely known professors, such books are probably good. These four seem a reasonable start (and do we need that many more?). But there are also plenty of self-appointed "experts" on this matter that fail this test...
2884:
institutions, too, so how does it get us any further? (Were did you read about this? I cannot even find a mention of it). Are you sure its not about purely academic careers? Data science is just a lot of buzzword bingo and rebranding. We should wait for an actual accepted definition.
2828:
This seems to be a free and open journal (CC-By-4.0) and is about data science. It published its first issue today. Some of the articles are social enough to present basic defining information about data science to the general public. This might be useful for this Knowledge article.
2088:
I propose that risk should be mitigated within the team. Utilizing an external marketing resource compounds the risk factor, at the very least, by adding one more possible point of failure. How is the "translation" angle currently handled by working teams? Is it within or without?
1406: 482: 2911:
This sounds nothing like what a data scientist does and more describes someone who works with and studies the theory of computation. In fact, the BLS page for Mathematicians and Statisticians is actually much more akin to the actual responsibilities of data scientists:
2148:
Domain Specific Interests begins by recapitulating a definition of data science, which is unnecessary so late in the article. "Data science requires a versatile skill-set" is an unverified claim that doesn't contribute much information about the article subject.
2193:
There is actually a lot of controversy about whether data science is distinct from statistics. The "Statistics = Data Science?" lecture cited in the article is clear evidence of that. It can be seen as old wine in new bottles. See this article in Forbes, too:
2062:“A data scientist is somebody who is inquisitive, who can stare at data and spot trends. It’s almost like a Renaissance individual who really wants to learn and bring change to an organization.” — Anjul Bhambhri, Vice President of Big Data Products, IBM 2879:
I'm not sure whether I would Data Science even to be a "professional field". On one hand, it claims to be science (i.e., academic), and on the other hand there is no such professional body or even a definition. And the whitepaper is about reports from
3227: 1349: 3121:
This thread has to refer to the specific names of mathematical/statistical theory that data scientists use. Otherwise we're talking about English professors as data scientists, and philosophy professors as analyzing data on the human condition.
1770:. I do not see a reason to rewrite it yet again to make Mr. Fox "passive data reuse" opinion dominant. Fact is that opinions and definitions disagree. And in a few years we may need to add "data science bubble" to this article, so what? 2283:
analysts, and essentially everybody else that uses data, unfortunately... Everybody see themselves as "the" archetype of "sexy" data science and tries to push their point of view on what is data science, and that everybody else is not.
2645:(while he was "data science" at Linkedin before, he now seems to be doing mostly consulting, and the hype supposedly is worth money to him...). It seems to be a common expectation that the hype will blow up sooner or later... 204: 2382:
Can we get rid of the "Further Reading" section? It's not adding anything to the article, and because the topic of Data Science is so broad, readers would be better off just searching for appropriate books on Amazon.
153: 1798:
come up with a better description than “A field of study involving the use of computers to perform statistics,” then by all means, do so, but from this article, this is what I have gathered the field is about.
2297:
It had seemed the point of the sentence was advocacy for DS, not for a particular view of DS. I see you apparently didn't have criticism of my other points, namely that the lede is overly negative and not
1848:
ideas on the terms of those who espouse them, for the good reason that editors, regardless of claims to neutrality, have a responsibility to the audience to make sense of the content for the audience.
3337: 847: 3098: 3195: 2915:"Develop mathematical or statistical models to analyze data." "Interpret data and report conclusions drawn from their analyses." "Use data analysis to support and improve business decisions." 506: 945: 3188:
fields of science and mathematics evolve over time. It is not surprising in the least that the field of statistics has evolved to address digital data sets and digital processing of data.
2905:
A computer and information research scientist is not the same thing as a data scientist in the context as shown on the BLS website. A look at the responsibilities page makes this clear:
646: 2573:
This has some excellent coverage of social issues which I have not seen elsewhere. They have weird access barriers on their website but I think anyone can download the PDF to read at
1652:. Perhaps we should redirect "data-driven science over there, move the text on Gray to it, then use the present page for Data Science as the modern profession ? What do people think ? 1227:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the 3327: 3290: 3417: 3342: 3073: 563: 501: 1970:
Sorry, I have no idea what you are trying to say. There is nothing wrong with the image that I can see. Could you provide specific criticism other than "absolutely awful"?
3372: 424: 2925:
The truth is the BLS does not have a dedicated page for this occupation, but the page for Computer & Information Research Scientists should definitely not be cited.
434: 147: 2853:
job opportunities of a certain time and place, which is not general interest to everyone in the way that a general presentation of the field subject matter would be.
2730:
At a glance all these seem like fine sources to include. I agree that I expect there is plenty of criticism and that we should plan to include it in the narrative.
1455: 1616:
is a Turing Award winner, whose notable opinion of a "fourth paradigm" is found in independently written books. It shouldn't just be removed to promote your book.
3402: 3377: 939: 2250:
The O'Reilly reference for "diluted beyond influence" is actually very positive on the field of DS, but some negative wording from the article was cherry-picked.
1050: 1878:
on the opinion of Wiki editors. So if you can find widely accepted, less vague-advertising definitions of data science (how about "the sexiest job"?) in some
3447: 3387: 837: 3432: 3352: 2970:
is a newly released book which I thought could be used to develop this article. It is open access with a Wikimedia compatible license so I copied it here.
1228: 1223: 1196: 1173: 400: 309: 3367: 3357: 608: 319: 79: 2139:
Is the section structure right for this article? The "History" section definitely belongs; I think specific conferences are trivial to a wide audience.
3427: 3412: 3322: 2918:
Similarly, the BLS actually groups employment statistics for this occupation along with other mathematical science occupations, not computer science:
1483: 1418: 1369: 1312: 1145: 1040: 2232:
In wikipedia you describe the controversy, you don't engage in it. Say something like "some people refer to it as a buzzword" and include the link.
3392: 1155: 3332: 2598: 1735:
research sciences ; or (3) make it as a page which says the term is contentious and has been defined by a big list of people in different ways ?
582: 2418:
I am trying to determine what sources give a general overview of the topic. I hardly know where to begin, but I am looking at these to start.
915: 447: 391: 368: 993: 3437: 3397: 2563: 1813: 1272: 813: 671: 85: 2473: 2113: 1910:
by Drew Conway, which for me conveys best what Data Science is. There is the issue of checking copyright (it can be found with copyright to
3457: 3382: 2178: 1531:. The list is rather unreadable, but there exists no usable definition of data science so we have to live with "definition by examples". -- 285: 44: 3347: 3123: 1617: 554: 3281: 3263: 3235: 3102: 3057: 2500: 2459: 1598: 1016: 3199: 3117:
Prior to 8/11/2022the definition was too general. You could call English PhD, an analyst of text data, and therefore a data scientist
2253:"No consensus on definition or curriculum" - can also be said for computer science, IT, computer engineering, etc. Are those "fads"? 3452: 3422: 3407: 2482: 2314: 2199: 1999: 906: 870: 535: 2195: 2940: 804: 781: 3362: 3317: 736: 710: 627: 268: 238: 99: 30: 2796:
settings, to prepare people for careers. This just came out and I am just reviewing this, but I wanted to share it here now.
2171:
removed by other contributors. I recommend that the article is locked from unmoderated edits and that the vandal is banned.
1299:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
104: 20: 2649:
editing this page for a while -- hopefully you and others will arrive at a consensus as to what should be there. Peace out.
2712: 168: 3442: 1613: 1112: 1073: 1007: 968: 74: 135: 3181:"Data science" is nothing more than a relatively recent buzzword designed to make the field of statistics sound sexier. 2548: 592: 473: 213: 3175:
Nate Silver is exactly right in saying that there is no difference between "data science" and the field of statistics.
2667: 2610:
Many people want to know the career marketplace for this field. I think this article lays out popular thought on this.
2781: 2694: 2059:
I'm moving this quote here that an IP placed in the lead. We might be able to use it (or not) but it needs a source:
602: 516: 65: 3029: 2256:"half-life of a buzzword" reference is now 5 years old. If it's still around, it's probably not simply a buzzword. 1164: 637: 399:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
345: 3178:
Any misbegotten attempts to draw a distinction between the two terms, such as this article, is doomed to failure.
2215: 1266: 664: 2890: 2760: 2721: 2682: 2538: 2322: 2288: 2182: 2021:
Most of the rest of the article does not seem to cover a topic, either, so it will probably also be deleted.
1887: 1853: 1834: 1809: 1775: 1705: 1667:
restored both the professional version of DS and also the Jim Gray forth paradigm text. Also added redirect to
1201: 129: 1621: 3156: 3127: 3004: 2672: 109: 2203: 2003: 3247: 2978: 2936: 2868: 2837: 2804: 2738: 2618: 2585: 2517: 2388: 2102: 1595: 1104: 281: 3069: 125: 3025: 3021: 2156: 573: 219: 2636:
I think some critical thoughts like that should be included, not just the hype. There were some, until
892: 796: 775: 3299: 3076:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
2932: 2928: 2654: 2403: 2223: 2174: 2120: 2098: 2029: 1995: 1960: 1849: 1805: 1801: 1573: 1555: 1512: 1262: 741: 715: 246: 2398:
Agreed. A Knowledge entry isn't a good place for reading lists on such a broad and amorphous topic.
2092:
Additionaly, it always helps when a presentation has a strong narrative structure, don’t you think?
190: 175: 2886: 2756: 2717: 2678: 2534: 2318: 2284: 2070: 2044: 1975: 1940: 1883: 1830: 1771: 1701: 161: 55: 2039:
The lead is fine and defines the topic quite well. I'm afraid I do not understand your criticism.
1527:, so it makes sense to emphasize those parts (e.g. statistics) that are more important than, say, 1015:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
914:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
812:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
284:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3285: 3218:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
3141: 3137:
The introduction is supposed to be general, while the rest of the article can go into specifics.
3045: 2146:
Clinical Data Science: I'm skeptical that a word can be "coined" and widely adopted in ~5 months
1907: 1491: 1446:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1426: 1397:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1377: 1340:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1320: 898: 70: 2957: 2315:
http://theconversation.com/statistics-and-data-science-degrees-overhyped-or-the-real-deal-102958
882: 864: 3259: 2196:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2013/08/19/data-science-whats-the-half-life-of-a-buzzword/
3243: 3231: 2971: 2861: 2830: 2797: 2750: 2731: 2631: 2611: 2578: 2560: 2510: 2497: 2479: 2456: 2384: 2341: 2313:
is not the answer (instead, everybody should have better basic knowledge in statistics, e.g.,
2024:
If I can find any sentences with "content" that apply to the "topic" I will leave them alone.
1592: 1467: 1357: 492: 51: 1762:
We already have (1) 'Sexiest Job of the 21st Century' and (2) '"fourth paradigm" of science'
2435: 2303: 2269: 2237: 2152: 1925: 1459: 1353: 544: 396: 3295: 2665:
Many of these efforts (and all the money invested in expensive consultants) seem to fail:
2650: 2637: 2399: 2368: 2219: 2116: 2025: 1956: 1591:
I think you should move this to the bottom as a new section as nobody will see it here. ♫
1569: 1551: 1536: 1508: 1121: 141: 2557:
DATA MATTERS : ethics, data, and international research collaboration in a changing world
2144:
Research Areas: How can we verify that this list is exhaustive and each item significant?
2755:
I have restored the old version, although I do not like the wording "To its discredit".
1088: 1067: 2066: 2040: 1971: 1936: 1700:
to use that book). Sorry, I don't think we can find a consensus on using your rewrite.
1410: 999: 618: 460: 483:
Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
3311: 3080: 3041: 2856:
The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in October 2019 published an interesting white paper,
2789: 1697: 1487: 1475: 1422: 1373: 1361: 1316: 2317:) - the hype is part of what differentiates data science from statistics, isn't it? 1986: 2423: 1471: 1304: 24: 2439: 2340:
The article confounds information with knowledge. See for example this reference
3214: 3017: 2919: 2299: 2265: 2233: 1921: 1528: 1442: 1393: 1336: 1295: 983: 962: 911: 1525:
most parts of mathematics research are only marginally relevant to data science
729: 704: 260: 232: 2364: 2355:. Syracuse University School of Information Studies. Retrieved 8 August 2012. 1532: 1463: 1253: 1094: 989: 888: 809: 2452: 1952: 1668: 1649: 525: 277: 383: 362: 2691:
Another critical opinion mentioning a Gartner number of 85% failure rate:
328: 2469: 2114:
Empirically-based approach to understanding the structure of data science
1955:
in terms of usefulness to humanity. And that image is absolutely awful.
273: 3270: 3074:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 30#Hadelin De Ponteves
3064: 1915: 1012: 2705: 2574: 1117: 3303: 3251: 3203: 3164: 3131: 3106: 3087: 3049: 3033: 2983: 2944: 2894: 2873: 2842: 2809: 2764: 2743: 2725: 2686: 2658: 2623: 2590: 2542: 2522: 2407: 2392: 2372: 2326: 2307: 2292: 2273: 2241: 2227: 2207: 2186: 2160: 2124: 2106: 2074: 2048: 2033: 2007: 1979: 1964: 1944: 1929: 1891: 1857: 1838: 1817: 1779: 1709: 1625: 1601: 1577: 1559: 1540: 1516: 1495: 1430: 1381: 1324: 1215: 1190: 2361:
is a broken link, perhaps this material can be accessed elsewhere?
3291:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 8 § Data duck
3288:. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at 2956: 2780: 2822: 2858:
Careers of Data Scientists: Report from 13 Academic Institutions
2352:
Jeffrey M. Stanton (20 May 2012). "Introduction to Data science"
2216:
Data Science, Big Data and Statistics - Can We All Live Together
1987:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Data_Science_Venn_Diagram.png
3007:
by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
1985:
The data science venn diagram is now available at WikiCommons:
3112:
Wiki Education assignment: DATS 6450 - Ethics for Data Science
2992: 2901:
Computer & Information Research Scientist ≠ Data Scientist
2668:"Companies Are Failing in Their Efforts to Become Data-Driven" 1935:
Wikibooks already has an image in use, so I added it instead.
1612:
In contrast to Mr. Fox and his just-out specialized book, Mr.
601:
Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see
184: 15: 3209:
Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities
1825:
description / "definition", but instead we should work with
1252: 1163: 327: 3020:
is a data science software platform for the development of
2342:
http://www.infogineering.net/data-information-knowledge.htm
2344:
for a good description of the difference between the two.
2475:
The fourth paradigm : data-intensive scientific discovery
2358: 2353: 3276: 2642: 2531: 2449:
Data Science (The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series)
1766:(3) in 'History' and 'Relationship to Statistics' with 3013:
In the "Platforms" section, please add the following:
2599:"Why There Will Be No Data Science Job Titles By 2029" 160: 3338:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
3194:
It is misleading and dishonest to pretend otherwise.
3068:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
1437:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
1388:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
1331:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
1290:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
3284:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
1261:
This article was accepted on 4 May 2012 by reviewer
1011:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 910:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 808:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 395:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 272:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2080:
Should "Communicator" Be Added To Discipline Chart?
944:This article has not yet received a rating on the 507:Computer science articles needing expert attention 2472:; Tansley, Stewart; Tolle, Kristin, eds. (2009). 2428:Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2018:So I will probably delete most if not all of it. 2496:(First edition. ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly. 2426:(19 December 2017). "50 Years of Data Science". 739:, a project which is currently considered to be 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2713:"Statistics Losing Ground to Computer Science" 2198:. I'm thinking of adding a criticism section. 647:WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs 3328:Knowledge vital articles in Physical sciences 2920:https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes152098.htm 174: 8: 2447:Kelleher, John D.; Tierney, Brendan (2018). 2112:YES! There is a study to support your claim 1116:, which collaborates on articles related to 3418:C-Class physics articles of High-importance 3343:C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences 2260:groups were trying to hype up DS as a name. 1237:Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation 564:Computer science articles without infoboxes 502:Computer science articles needing attention 2926: 1799: 1240:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation 1221:This article was reviewed by member(s) of 1185: 1062: 957: 859: 770: 699: 468:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 442: 357: 227: 3373:High-importance Computer science articles 2166:Vandalism / "Data Science is a buzz word" 1484:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1419:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1370:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1313:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1920:), and the fact that it's from a blog. 1482:Above undated message substituted from 1417:Above undated message substituted from 1368:Above undated message substituted from 1311:Above undated message substituted from 1187: 1064: 959: 861: 772: 701: 359: 229: 188: 3099:2405:201:5C09:5102:9D8C:35AA:43A3:F943 2492:Schutt, Rachel; O'Neil, Cathy (2013). 2278:Well, the reference does contain '... 1672:but can we provide some more as well ? 409:Knowledge:WikiProject Computer science 3403:Unknown-priority mathematics articles 3378:WikiProject Computer science articles 3196:2601:200:C000:1A0:88E0:B50A:C99D:52BB 2414:Likely good general reference sources 412:Template:WikiProject Computer science 7: 3190:It is still the field of statistics. 1172:This article is within the field of 1110:This article is within the scope of 1005:This article is within the scope of 904:This article is within the scope of 802:This article is within the scope of 735:This article is within the scope of 389:This article is within the scope of 266:This article is within the scope of 3448:AfC submissions by date/04 May 2012 3388:High-importance Statistics articles 2695:"Data Science Consulting Is A SCAM" 2014:The lede does not define the topic. 23:for discussing improvements to the 3433:Systems articles in systems theory 3353:High-importance Computing articles 3223: 3219: 1451: 1447: 1402: 1398: 1345: 1341: 583:Timeline of computing 2020–present 14: 3368:C-Class Computer science articles 3358:Computing articles needing images 1224:WikiProject Articles for creation 924:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 609:Computing articles needing images 3428:High-importance Systems articles 3413:High-importance physics articles 3323:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 3269: 3226:. Further details are available 3213: 3063: 3056:"Hadelin De Ponteves" listed at 2996: 1454:. Further details are available 1441: 1405:. Further details are available 1392: 1348:. Further details are available 1335: 1294: 1214: 1200: 1189: 1097: 1087: 1066: 992: 982: 961: 927:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 891: 881: 863: 822:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics 795: 774: 728: 703: 459: 382: 361: 336:An editor has requested that an 259: 245: 231: 198: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3393:WikiProject Statistics articles 3294:until a consensus is reached. 3072:. The discussion will occur at 1648:there is already an article on 1150:This article has been rated as 1045:This article has been rated as 842:This article has been rated as 825:Template:WikiProject Statistics 751:Knowledge:WikiProject Databases 429:This article has been rated as 314:This article has been rated as 294:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing 3333:C-Class level-5 vital articles 2823:https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/ 2597:Gift, Noah (4 February 2019). 2107:15:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC) 1882:then everybody will be happy. 1696:indicates that you may have a 754:Template:WikiProject Databases 297:Template:WikiProject Computing 218:It is of interest to multiple 1: 3242:— Assignment last updated by 3107:05:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 3034:02:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC) 2968:Data Journeys in the Sciences 2962:Data Journeys in the Sciences 2952:Data Journeys in the Sciences 2765:10:44, 23 February 2019 (UTC) 2744:19:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC) 2726:17:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC) 2687:16:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC) 2659:02:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC) 2624:15:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC) 2440:10.1080/10618600.2017.1384734 2408:19:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2393:01:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2308:20:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC) 2228:10:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2161:22:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 2125:10:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2008:19:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 1614:Jim Gray (computer scientist) 1578:10:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 1560:05:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC) 1541:13:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 1517:10:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 1130:Knowledge:WikiProject Systems 1025:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics 1019:and see a list of open tasks. 918:and see a list of open tasks. 816:and see a list of open tasks. 663:Tag all relevant articles in 403:and see a list of open tasks. 288:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 3438:WikiProject Systems articles 3398:C-Class mathematics articles 3304:22:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 3252:01:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC) 2895:22:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 2874:15:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 2559:. NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS. 2549:National Academy of Sciences 2373:03:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC) 2327:10:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC) 1870:That description supposedly 1496:19:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 1431:19:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 1382:19:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 1325:19:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 1133:Template:WikiProject Systems 1028:Template:WikiProject Physics 672:WikiProject Computer science 448:WikiProject Computer science 392:WikiProject Computer science 3458:Implemented requested edits 3383:C-Class Statistics articles 3204:20:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 3165:00:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC) 3132:23:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC) 2816:Harvard Data Science Review 2693:Piyanka Jain (2019-01-29). 2591:14:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC) 2280:highlights advocacy efforts 1951:This seems even worse than 1945:05:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 603:List of computer scientists 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3474: 3348:C-Class Computing articles 3088:17:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 3050:12:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC) 2543:06:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC) 2523:21:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC) 1839:12:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC) 1818:07:14, 13 April 2019 (UTC) 1156:project's importance scale 1051:project's importance scale 435:project's importance scale 320:project's importance scale 2945:03:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC) 2709:they just move on. E.g., 2293:12:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC) 2274:22:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC) 2218:refers to the same issue 2214:This talk by Terry Speed 2208:01:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1930:12:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC) 1780:19:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 1710:18:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 1626:21:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1602:09:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1502:Overview, full of rubbish 1260: 1209: 1171: 1149: 1082: 1044: 977: 943: 876: 841: 790: 723: 665:Category:Computer science 441: 428: 415:Computer science articles 377: 335: 313: 254: 226: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3453:Accepted AfC submissions 3423:C-Class Systems articles 3408:C-Class physics articles 3282:redirects for discussion 3264:Redirects for discussion 3058:Redirects for discussion 2984:21:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 2843:16:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 2810:15:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC) 2491: 2242:04:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 2187:16:20, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 2075:09:46, 12 May 2013 (UTC) 1917:Zero intelligence agents 1858:16:46, 01 May 2019 (UTC) 946:project's priority scale 667:and sub-categories with 2673:Harvard Business Review 2640:removed them recently: 2049:07:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC) 2034:01:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1980:07:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC) 1965:01:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 1892:22:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 1691:There is a lengthy and 907:WikiProject Mathematics 3363:All Computing articles 3318:C-Class vital articles 2964: 2792: 2786:The State of Open Data 2776:The State of Open Data 2478:. Microsoft Research. 2359:http://jsresearch.net/ 1257: 1168: 1105:Systems science portal 805:WikiProject Statistics 628:Computer science stubs 332: 282:information technology 75:avoid personal attacks 3230:. Student editor(s): 3022:business intelligence 2960: 2784: 2551:just published this: 1906:I would like to add 1829:as much as possible. 1458:. Student editor(s): 1409:. Student editor(s): 1352:. Student editor(s): 1303:. Student editor(s): 1256: 1234:Articles for creation 1231:for more information. 1197:Articles for creation 1167: 737:WikiProject Databases 331: 269:WikiProject Computing 205:level-5 vital article 100:Neutral point of view 3443:C-Class AfC articles 930:mathematics articles 446:Things you can help 105:No original research 3286:redirect guidelines 3280:has been listed at 3070:Hadelin De Ponteves 2788:, a 2019 book from 2575:their download page 1113:WikiProject Systems 1008:WikiProject Physics 828:Statistics articles 3228:on the course page 2965: 2793: 2494:Doing data science 2247:negatively toned: 1874:based on sources, 1768:various references 1462:. Peer reviewers: 1456:on the course page 1407:on the course page 1350:on the course page 1301:on the course page 1258: 1169: 899:Mathematics portal 757:Databases articles 333: 300:Computing articles 214:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 3011: 3010: 2947: 2931:comment added by 2565:978-0-309-48247-9 2177:comment added by 1998:comment added by 1908:this Venn diagram 1820: 1804:comment added by 1287: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1279: 1278: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1179: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1056: 956: 955: 952: 951: 858: 857: 854: 853: 769: 768: 765: 764: 698: 697: 694: 693: 690: 689: 686: 685: 356: 355: 352: 351: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3465: 3279: 3273: 3254: 3236:article contribs 3225: 3224:16 December 2022 3221: 3217: 3160: 3153: 3146: 3140: 3067: 3026:Sam at Megaputer 3000: 2999: 2993: 2981: 2976: 2871: 2866: 2840: 2835: 2807: 2802: 2754: 2741: 2736: 2716: 2711:Norman Matloff. 2702: 2677: 2644: 2635: 2621: 2616: 2606: 2588: 2583: 2569: 2533: 2520: 2515: 2506: 2488: 2465: 2443: 2189: 2010: 1880:reliable sources 1498: 1453: 1452:10 December 2020 1449: 1445: 1433: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1384: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1327: 1298: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1238: 1235: 1218: 1211: 1210: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1193: 1186: 1138: 1137: 1136:Systems articles 1134: 1131: 1128: 1107: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1091: 1084: 1083: 1078: 1070: 1063: 1033: 1032: 1031:physics articles 1029: 1026: 1023: 1002: 997: 996: 986: 979: 978: 973: 965: 958: 932: 931: 928: 925: 922: 901: 896: 895: 885: 878: 877: 867: 860: 848:importance scale 830: 829: 826: 823: 820: 799: 792: 791: 786: 778: 771: 759: 758: 755: 752: 749: 732: 725: 724: 719: 707: 700: 676: 670: 545:Computer science 474:Article requests 463: 456: 455: 443: 417: 416: 413: 410: 407: 406:Computer science 397:Computer science 386: 379: 378: 373: 369:Computer science 365: 358: 348:to this article. 302: 301: 298: 295: 292: 263: 256: 255: 250: 249: 248: 243: 235: 228: 211: 202: 201: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3473: 3472: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3308: 3307: 3275: 3267: 3241: 3211: 3173: 3163: 3158: 3147: 3142: 3138: 3119: 3114: 3095: 3079: 3061: 2997: 2991: 2979: 2972: 2955: 2903: 2869: 2862: 2850: 2848:Data scientists 2838: 2831: 2819: 2805: 2798: 2779: 2748: 2739: 2732: 2710: 2692: 2666: 2641: 2629: 2619: 2612: 2596: 2586: 2579: 2566: 2555: 2530: 2518: 2511: 2503: 2485: 2468: 2462: 2446: 2422: 2416: 2380: 2378:Further Reading 2350: 2172: 2168: 2142:Other examples: 2133: 2082: 2057: 2016: 1993: 1904: 1850:Robert macphail 1806:Robert macphail 1504: 1481: 1439: 1416: 1390: 1367: 1342:13 January 2020 1333: 1310: 1292: 1263:Graeme Bartlett 1242: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1199: 1152:High-importance 1135: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1122:systems science 1103: 1098: 1096: 1077:High‑importance 1076: 1047:High-importance 1030: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1020: 998: 991: 972:High‑importance 971: 929: 926: 923: 920: 919: 897: 890: 844:High-importance 827: 824: 821: 818: 817: 785:High‑importance 784: 756: 753: 750: 747: 746: 713: 682: 679: 674: 668: 656:Project-related 651: 632: 613: 587: 568: 549: 530: 511: 487: 431:High-importance 414: 411: 408: 405: 404: 372:High‑importance 371: 316:High-importance 299: 296: 293: 290: 289: 244: 242:High‑importance 241: 212:on Knowledge's 209: 199: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3471: 3469: 3461: 3460: 3455: 3450: 3445: 3440: 3435: 3430: 3425: 3420: 3415: 3410: 3405: 3400: 3395: 3390: 3385: 3380: 3375: 3370: 3365: 3360: 3355: 3350: 3345: 3340: 3335: 3330: 3325: 3320: 3310: 3309: 3266: 3256: 3220:22 August 2022 3210: 3207: 3172: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3155: 3118: 3115: 3113: 3110: 3094: 3091: 3077: 3060: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3037: 3036: 3009: 3008: 3001: 2990: 2987: 2974:Blue Rasberry 2954: 2949: 2902: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2887:HelpUsStopSpam 2864:Blue Rasberry 2849: 2846: 2833:Blue Rasberry 2826: 2825: 2818: 2813: 2800:Blue Rasberry 2778: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2757:HelpUsStopSpam 2734:Blue Rasberry 2718:HelpUsStopSpam 2703: 2689: 2679:HelpUsStopSpam 2663: 2662: 2661: 2614:Blue Rasberry 2608: 2607: 2581:Blue Rasberry 2571: 2570: 2564: 2546: 2545: 2535:HelpUsStopSpam 2513:Blue Rasberry 2508: 2507: 2502:978-1449358655 2501: 2489: 2483: 2466: 2461:978-0262535434 2460: 2444: 2434:(4): 745–766. 2415: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2379: 2376: 2349: 2346: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2319:HelpUsStopSpam 2285:HelpUsStopSpam 2263: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2254: 2251: 2244: 2211: 2210: 2179:192.159.160.69 2167: 2164: 2147: 2145: 2143: 2132: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2081: 2078: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2015: 2012: 1983: 1982: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1903: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1884:HelpUsStopSpam 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1842: 1841: 1831:HelpUsStopSpam 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1772:HelpUsStopSpam 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1702:HelpUsStopSpam 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1586: 1585: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1544: 1543: 1503: 1500: 1448:25 August 2020 1438: 1435: 1403:14 August 2020 1389: 1386: 1332: 1329: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1259: 1249: 1248: 1246: 1219: 1207: 1206: 1194: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1174:Systems theory 1170: 1160: 1159: 1148: 1142: 1141: 1139: 1109: 1108: 1092: 1080: 1079: 1071: 1059: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1043: 1037: 1036: 1034: 1017:the discussion 1004: 1003: 1000:Physics portal 987: 975: 974: 966: 954: 953: 950: 949: 942: 936: 935: 933: 916:the discussion 903: 902: 886: 874: 873: 868: 856: 855: 852: 851: 840: 834: 833: 831: 814:the discussion 800: 788: 787: 779: 767: 766: 763: 762: 760: 733: 721: 720: 708: 696: 695: 692: 691: 688: 687: 684: 683: 681: 680: 678: 677: 660: 652: 650: 649: 643: 633: 631: 630: 624: 614: 612: 611: 606: 598: 588: 586: 585: 579: 569: 567: 566: 560: 550: 548: 547: 541: 531: 529: 528: 522: 512: 510: 509: 504: 498: 488: 486: 485: 479: 467: 465: 464: 452: 451: 439: 438: 427: 421: 420: 418: 401:the discussion 387: 375: 374: 366: 354: 353: 350: 349: 334: 324: 323: 312: 306: 305: 303: 286:the discussion 264: 252: 251: 236: 224: 223: 217: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3470: 3459: 3456: 3454: 3451: 3449: 3446: 3444: 3441: 3439: 3436: 3434: 3431: 3429: 3426: 3424: 3421: 3419: 3416: 3414: 3411: 3409: 3406: 3404: 3401: 3399: 3396: 3394: 3391: 3389: 3386: 3384: 3381: 3379: 3376: 3374: 3371: 3369: 3366: 3364: 3361: 3359: 3356: 3354: 3351: 3349: 3346: 3344: 3341: 3339: 3336: 3334: 3331: 3329: 3326: 3324: 3321: 3319: 3316: 3315: 3313: 3306: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3292: 3287: 3283: 3278: 3274:The redirect 3272: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3255: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3239: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3216: 3208: 3206: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3192: 3191: 3187: 3182: 3179: 3176: 3171:Bogus article 3170: 3166: 3162: 3161: 3154: 3152: 3151: 3145: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3124:68.134.243.51 3116: 3111: 3109: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3092: 3090: 3089: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3075: 3071: 3066: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3006: 3002: 2995: 2994: 2988: 2986: 2985: 2982: 2977: 2975: 2969: 2963: 2959: 2953: 2950: 2948: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2923: 2921: 2916: 2913: 2909: 2906: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2883: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2872: 2867: 2865: 2859: 2854: 2847: 2845: 2844: 2841: 2836: 2834: 2824: 2821: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2803: 2801: 2791: 2790:African Minds 2787: 2783: 2777: 2774: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2752: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2742: 2737: 2735: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2714: 2707: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2690: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2675: 2674: 2669: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2639: 2633: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2622: 2617: 2615: 2604: 2600: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2584: 2582: 2576: 2567: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2550: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2521: 2516: 2514: 2504: 2499: 2495: 2490: 2486: 2484:9780982544204 2481: 2477: 2476: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2424:Donoho, David 2421: 2420: 2419: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2377: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2360: 2356: 2354: 2347: 2345: 2343: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2281: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2264: 2258: 2255: 2252: 2249: 2248: 2245: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2212: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2165: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2140: 2137: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2079: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2063: 2060: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2022: 2019: 2013: 2011: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1989: 1988: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1913: 1909: 1901: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618:80.151.33.166 1615: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1501: 1499: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1479: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1444: 1436: 1434: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1414: 1412: 1408: 1395: 1387: 1385: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1365: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1338: 1330: 1328: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1308: 1306: 1302: 1297: 1289: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1220: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1198: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1175: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1114: 1106: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1052: 1048: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1035: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1001: 995: 990: 988: 985: 981: 980: 976: 970: 967: 964: 960: 947: 941: 938: 937: 934: 917: 913: 909: 908: 900: 894: 889: 887: 884: 880: 879: 875: 872: 869: 866: 862: 849: 845: 839: 836: 835: 832: 815: 811: 807: 806: 801: 798: 794: 793: 789: 783: 780: 777: 773: 761: 744: 743: 738: 734: 731: 727: 726: 722: 717: 712: 709: 706: 702: 673: 666: 662: 661: 659: 657: 653: 648: 645: 644: 642: 640: 639: 634: 629: 626: 625: 623: 621: 620: 615: 610: 607: 604: 600: 599: 597: 595: 594: 589: 584: 581: 580: 578: 576: 575: 570: 565: 562: 561: 559: 557: 556: 551: 546: 543: 542: 540: 538: 537: 532: 527: 524: 523: 521: 519: 518: 513: 508: 505: 503: 500: 499: 497: 495: 494: 489: 484: 481: 480: 478: 476: 475: 470: 469: 466: 462: 458: 457: 454: 453: 449: 445: 444: 440: 436: 432: 426: 423: 422: 419: 402: 398: 394: 393: 388: 385: 381: 380: 376: 370: 367: 364: 360: 347: 343: 339: 330: 326: 325: 321: 317: 311: 308: 307: 304: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 270: 265: 262: 258: 257: 253: 240: 237: 234: 230: 225: 221: 215: 207: 206: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3289: 3268: 3262:" listed at 3244:Random.emily 3240: 3232:Random.emily 3212: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3183: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3157: 3149: 3148: 3143: 3120: 3096: 3082: 3081: 3062: 3012: 3005:edit request 2989:Edit request 2973: 2967: 2966: 2961: 2951: 2927:— Preceding 2924: 2917: 2914: 2910: 2907: 2904: 2881: 2863: 2857: 2855: 2851: 2832: 2827: 2815: 2799: 2794: 2785: 2775: 2751:Bluerasberry 2733: 2698: 2671: 2632:Bluerasberry 2613: 2609: 2602: 2580: 2572: 2556: 2547: 2512: 2509: 2493: 2474: 2448: 2431: 2427: 2417: 2385:Michaelmalak 2381: 2363: 2357: 2351: 2348:Broken Links 2339: 2279: 2173:— Preceding 2169: 2151: 2141: 2138: 2134: 2097: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2064: 2061: 2058: 2023: 2020: 2017: 1994:— Preceding 1990: 1984: 1950: 1916: 1911: 1905: 1902:Venn diagram 1879: 1875: 1871: 1826: 1800:— Preceding 1796: 1767: 1763: 1692: 1593:RichardWeiss 1566: 1524: 1505: 1480: 1468:Heather98psu 1440: 1415: 1391: 1366: 1358:Michelle Ran 1334: 1309: 1293: 1269: 1243:AfC articles 1229:project page 1222: 1151: 1111: 1046: 1006: 905: 843: 803: 740: 655: 654: 638:Unreferenced 636: 635: 617: 616: 591: 590: 572: 571: 553: 552: 534: 533: 515: 514: 491: 490: 472: 471: 430: 390: 341: 337: 315: 267: 220:WikiProjects 203: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 25:Data science 19:This is the 3184:Of course, 3018:PolyAnalyst 2200:96.42.47.28 2153:Nickknack00 2131:Tone Issues 2095:Thank you! 2000:80.4.175.98 1529:Lie algebra 1460:Lendawg2303 1399:7 July 2020 1354:AlexColello 921:Mathematics 912:mathematics 871:Mathematics 148:free images 31:not a forum 3312:Categories 3296:Duckmather 2933:RuyLopez21 2651:Dtunkelang 2638:Dtunkelang 2400:Dtunkelang 2220:Carlosayam 2117:Carlosayam 2099:Eustressor 2026:Huw Powell 1957:Huw Powell 1570:Carlosayam 1552:Carlosayam 1509:Carlosayam 1346:1 May 2020 819:Statistics 810:statistics 782:Statistics 342:photograph 3277:Data duck 3260:Data duck 2470:Hey, Tony 2453:MIT Press 2067:Viriditas 2041:Viriditas 1972:Viriditas 1953:semiotics 1937:Viriditas 1669:e-science 1650:e-Science 1411:YueWu0928 748:Databases 711:Databases 526:Computing 291:Computing 278:computing 274:computers 239:Computing 208:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3150:spinster 3083:Rosguill 3078:signed, 3042:Caius G. 2941:contribs 2929:unsigned 2882:academic 2175:unsigned 2065:Thanks. 1996:unsigned 1912:dataists 1814:contribs 1802:unsigned 1599:contribs 1488:PrimeBOT 1476:Sypb5045 1423:PrimeBOT 1374:PrimeBOT 1362:Gvenator 1317:PrimeBOT 1273:contribs 742:inactive 716:inactive 574:Maintain 517:Copyedit 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3024:tools. 1827:sources 1693:sourced 1472:Npb5183 1305:Onuriel 1154:on the 1127:Systems 1118:systems 1074:Systems 1049:on the 1022:Physics 1013:Physics 969:Physics 846:on the 555:Infobox 493:Cleanup 433:on the 318:on the 210:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3097:Uuxxi 3040:Done. 2980:(talk) 2870:(talk) 2839:(talk) 2806:(talk) 2740:(talk) 2706:AMSTAT 2699:Forbes 2620:(talk) 2603:Forbes 2587:(talk) 2519:(talk) 2300:Nerfer 2266:Nerfer 2234:Nerfer 1922:Marcrr 1914:or to 1698:WP:COI 536:Expand 280:, and 216:scale. 126:Google 3144:disco 3003:This 2365:weems 2298:NPOV. 2055:Quote 1533:Chire 1464:Mmh65 619:Stubs 593:Photo 450:with: 346:added 338:image 197:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3300:talk 3248:talk 3222:and 3200:talk 3159:talk 3128:talk 3103:talk 3046:talk 3030:talk 2937:talk 2891:talk 2761:talk 2722:talk 2683:talk 2655:talk 2561:ISBN 2539:talk 2498:ISBN 2480:ISBN 2457:ISBN 2404:talk 2389:talk 2369:talk 2323:talk 2304:talk 2289:talk 2270:talk 2238:talk 2224:talk 2204:talk 2183:talk 2157:talk 2121:talk 2103:talk 2071:talk 2045:talk 2030:talk 2004:talk 1976:talk 1961:talk 1941:talk 1926:talk 1888:talk 1854:talk 1835:talk 1810:talk 1776:talk 1706:talk 1622:talk 1596:talk 1574:talk 1556:talk 1537:talk 1513:talk 1492:talk 1450:and 1427:talk 1401:and 1378:talk 1344:and 1321:talk 1267:talk 1146:High 1120:and 1041:High 838:High 425:High 310:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3238:). 3186:all 3139:... 3093:Ggg 2436:doi 1876:not 1764:and 1486:by 1421:by 1372:by 1315:by 940:??? 344:be 340:or 176:TWL 3314:: 3302:) 3250:) 3202:) 3130:) 3105:) 3048:) 3032:) 2943:) 2939:• 2922:. 2893:) 2763:) 2724:) 2697:. 2685:) 2670:. 2657:) 2601:. 2577:. 2541:) 2455:. 2451:. 2432:26 2430:. 2406:) 2391:) 2371:) 2325:) 2306:) 2291:) 2272:) 2240:) 2226:) 2206:) 2185:) 2159:) 2123:) 2105:) 2073:) 2047:) 2032:) 2006:) 1978:) 1963:) 1943:) 1928:) 1890:) 1872:is 1856:• 1837:) 1816:) 1812:• 1778:) 1708:) 1624:) 1576:) 1558:) 1539:) 1515:) 1494:) 1478:. 1474:, 1470:, 1466:, 1429:) 1413:. 1380:) 1364:. 1360:, 1356:, 1323:) 1307:. 1275:). 675:}} 669:{{ 276:, 156:) 54:; 3298:( 3258:" 3246:( 3234:( 3198:( 3126:( 3101:( 3044:( 3028:( 2935:( 2889:( 2759:( 2753:: 2749:@ 2720:( 2715:. 2701:. 2681:( 2676:. 2653:( 2634:: 2630:@ 2605:. 2568:. 2537:( 2505:. 2487:. 2464:. 2442:. 2438:: 2402:( 2387:( 2367:( 2321:( 2302:( 2287:( 2268:( 2236:( 2222:( 2202:( 2181:( 2155:( 2119:( 2101:( 2069:( 2043:( 2028:( 2002:( 1974:( 1959:( 1939:( 1924:( 1886:( 1852:( 1833:( 1808:( 1774:( 1704:( 1620:( 1572:( 1554:( 1535:( 1511:( 1490:( 1425:( 1376:( 1319:( 1270:· 1265:( 1176:. 1158:. 1124:. 1053:. 948:. 850:. 745:. 718:) 714:( 658:: 641:: 622:: 605:) 596:: 577:: 558:: 539:: 520:: 496:: 477:: 437:. 322:. 222:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Data science
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Computing
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑