Talk:Derivative - Knowledge

2922:– Citing physical books seems unproblematic to me, and Stewart's is one of the most popular. A reader who wants to verify the claims made or see more can easily find this book in their local public or school library. For internet archive book links to copyrighted sources, you may need to first "check out" the book before reading the content, hence the gray dotted lock icon, or for some books publishers have requested that the content not be visible at all (such links should probably be removed, leaving link-less citations or e.g. linking Google Books instead). But since this is a very old and static topic, we could certainly also link to freely available scans which would be just as good. For example we could link to Goursat (1904) 858: 2798:; we maintain that useful links do not appear before inline citation to Keisler 2012, and thereafter they revert again to being useless (at least for a time). This density of poor sources at the top of the article indicate us a top down, post hoc attempt to provide any source at all for content earlier created but unsourced. (It also suggests a dedicated period of bibliographic work, wherein presenting bad links within the citation was perceived as being better than presenting no link at all, for these critical opening paragraphs of the article.) 388: 378: 357: 324: 2802:

in the Further reading section.) Its appearing both does a disservice to readers, pointing them toward a source that is not being used in formal maths education, and then a disservice to the encyclopedia, creating a sense of less-than-seriousness-of-approach, at the beginning of this very important article. As noted, use of this source appears to have been the result of dedicated period of naive, rather than academically informed editing.

1098:) into "D-notation", that is both natural and easily recognizable. I have also added a sentence in the beginning of the section for attributing the notation to Arbogast, and saying that some authors (not "many") use improperly "Euler's notation". This improper use of "Euler's notation" must be mentioned since some people may search for it, at least those who learned it in Knowledge, where it appeared in a edit of 178: 315: 1069:, you say """The established fact is that many people use the phrase "Euler's notation" for naming this notation""" -- please justify by providing references. According to what statistics? Do they understand what they say? "Arbogast's notation" is ok as a title, since it is indeed a notation of Arbogast. This is not orignal research, this is a known fact. At least according the literature I checked. 2727: 812: 473: 148: 578: 2860: 2816:

editorial perspective that sidelining dedicate, good editors is a reasonable cost for avoiding the hassles of reverting vandalism. (But note, there are easily applied tools to ID likely vandalism; it is not possible, yet, to improve the article, as I ask, apart from skilled editors such as the two of us. And as we cannot, we must ask you.)

931:, I am not asking to you to decide, I am asking you to provide sources based on which you reverted my edit. Knowledge should not invent names. A source that attributes the notation to Arbogast is currently cited in the very first sentence. You say something justifies your revert, but it is not clear what. 2786:

No links (square bracket or related markup removed), or an added disclaimer in the inline citation text noting the valuelessness of the link to the inline citation (see below), or replacement links that actually take readers to the suggested maths content supporting the text, or more carefully chosen

1315:

I'm saying this article seems like a fine Knowledge article. Like most of them, it could use additional work. Arguing about whether it ticks off some boxes on a made up checklist (a poor proxy for article quality) is a total waste of time. Addressing the specific criticisms raised here isn't going to

1253:

Just as I predicted it. The article has some unsourced paragraphs during I was adding the citations. Not to mention, they are also some parts that is not understandable per criterion 1a, for example the partial derivative part. Also, the history section, to me, is somewhat not related, as it mentions

2801:

Specific justification, (1) Given the wealth of scholarly web material on basic mathematics, there is no reason to use cartoon guides to STEM content—certainly not as a preponderant source in the opening definitions of this fundamental maths article (Gonick is a maths citation that belongs, at best,

960:

Could you please provide a reference to the relevant statistics of Scholar Google which justifies the "Euler" name? Common usage by whom? How the statistics were collected? On the other hand, since it is Arbogast's notation, in the sense that he invented and popularized it, it is a sufficient reason

2815:

An alternative to all of the above is that the the article be returned to a lower restriction level, to allow for open scholarly editing (realizing that such comprehensive, even if specific, changes noted are burdensome). But it is not in our power to change the protection status of the article, or

2793:

General. Currently, at best 3 of the first 17 inline citations links are actually useful to readers, in that only the 3 convey readers to a separate site that either supports the content appearing (in support of WP:VERIFY), or presents further material allowing deeper explanation and understanding.

1033:

I have absolute no opinion whether this is notation is due to Euler or not, and even whether Euler used it or not. The established fact is that many people use the phrase "Euler's notation" for naming this notation, and Knowledge cannot change this fact, and must not try to change it. This is why,

989:

I agree that Google Scholar must be considered with care. It is reliable for establishing that a terminology is uncommon. But it is not for comparing "D-notation" and "Euler's notation" because both phrases can have other meanings. Nevertheless "D-notation" seems less ambiguous. This is the reason

1458:

section is awfully wordy and detailed for an article that's supposed to be about the concept of the derivative in general. It's a bit odd that we have 10 paragraphs of text that take up about 2 screens and invoke mappings between tangent bundles, but we don't have anything on maxima and minima of

1731:

I was scribbling something in midnight having something in mind with my own thought process which is in obstacle always. Even when I recall / revisit myself whether it is right what I was thinking I couldn't correlate. I couldn't think stably as it's long years since my academic time. Maybe with

903:

I am unable to provide to decide which is the most common name among "Arbogast's notation", "Euler's notation", and "D-notation", but it is certainly not "Arbogast's notation". This justifies my revert. However, there are so many things that are named after Euler's, that "Euler's notation" would

2811:

is a disservice to readers, in that it distracts and disorients, and so wastes valuable educational time; and again, it casts the encyclopedia in an ill light. The links to sales sites should clearly be verboten. I would also say the remaining sites should also not appear, or that their inline

2335:

For applying the chain rule to a sum, a product or a fraction, one has to know the partial derivatives of a sum, a product or a division with respect to each of their arguments, and to use the chain rule for several variables. So, the proofs of these formulas using the chain rule are much more

1284:

This article would benefit significantly from an effort to add a gentler informal or semi-formal description at the top, with less jargon, more pictures, and accessible to a wider audience. (A better history section would also be nice.) Other than that, this article seems mostly fine, and this

2812:

citations should be accomplanied by a disclaimer that stops the reader from clicking on the useless link. ("The links appearing in the preceding citation identify the book but otherwise contain no accessible content relevant to the material presented in this Knowledge article.")

2223:

Sorry, but I do not understand what point you are trying to make. Please stick to concrete criticisms/suggestions about this article, and try to make your comments as clear as possible to help other editors follow along. Note that this talk page is not a general-purpose forum.

2135:

I moved this comment to a new section and archived the extremely stale 10-year-old comment it was nominally a "reply" to. I can't really make much sense of this new comment or figure out whether/how it was supposed to relate to the previous one in any way.

945:

Again, per Knowledge usage, this is not the attribution which motivates the name; it is the common usage. This is the fact that "Arbogast's notation" and "Arbogast notation" are very uncommon (less than 20 hits in Scholar Google) that justifies my revert.

2697:

By the way, none of the listed terms is ambiguous, and there are all generalizations of the usual derivatives. So, they must be added in the generalization section (if they are not there) with some explanation of the relationship with usual derivatives.

775: 897:

Could you please provide any evidence on the edited page that Euler used or popularized the D-notation for derivative, or that it is a "common name" (among who?) Otherwise, could you please restore my edit? Alexey Muranov (talk) 12:07, 2 October 2023

1018:

Sorry, but could you then please provide any justification that "D-notation" is a "common usage"? By whom? And if you keep a redirect for "Euler's notation", could you please explain what makes you think that this is "Euler's notation" in any sense?

2867:

Edit requests should have the form "please change X to Y"; if you would to suggest particular source substitutions (in a concrete way, by proposing the concrete addition of a specific reference in a specific location), you are welcome to do so.

1404:

I'm looking for the possibility of a scenario about the notation part: should this section mention after the higher derivative? In my opinion, the notation describes many different notations of differentiation, including the high order.

2466:

1459:

single-variable functions. And within that section, there's less emphasis comparatively speaking on Jacobians than I would have expected given how much I've seen these concepts covered in courses at different stages.

1254:

the history of how the calculus was made; maybe this could be expanded or merge to any other sections, or just delete it literally? I do think there are lot of problems in this article. Pinging more users: @

2374:

will show the change in addition to the end state.) I think "real numbers" seems fine, since the context in this page is single-variable real functions. I think a more general discussion belongs at

2779:(rather than to true, article-supporting maths content; instead, links are to book sales sites, Knowledge pages for the cited book, archive.org / google.com sites with no content presented, etc.)— 2905:

would you consider un-protecting the page, and we can see if the vandals might have given up by now? It's not clear to me why this page should be permanently protected against anonymous editing. –

1047:

An title must be chosen for the section. "Arbogast's notation" is excluded because, it is very rarely used, and as such, choosing it would break the fundamental rules of Knowledge, in particular

2808:= Stewart 2002, to a front matter-only page at archive.org , = Strang et al. 2023, to a book sales site, = Thompson 1998, just to the book's Knowledge page, not to any of its content, = Etc.— 1285:

reassessment is IMO a waste of time. Please feel free to add more specific citations if you want. All of this material is easily verifiable and discussed extensively in the cited references. –

444: 2316:. The reversion was appropriate because it was in the context of real functions of real variables. However, I believe that it would be appropriate to have a brief acknowledgement that the 1301:, are you saying that you feel this article meets the GA criteria, or that there is no need for this article to meet the GA criteria and discussing whether it should is a waste of time? 3212: 1474:

If that's the case, maybe this section can be summarize in at least one, two, or three paragraphs? Also, most of them are unsourced, together with the usage of first-person pronoun.

1051:. So, you must chose between "Euler's notation", which is a common name for the notation, and "D-notation", which is a factual description of the notation. What is your choice? 637: 2354:

Agreed: I wasn't suggesting adding an exposition on anything beyond the case of a reals function of a single real variable, just adding a brief note that it generalizes. --

2484:

As said in my last edit, hatnotes are only for disambiguation, and must not duplicate the dab page and/or the infobox. So, for this article, the only acceptable hatnote is

139: 3202: 1137: 285: 1553: 3217: 2976:

There are much better sources available. For example, the epsilon delta definition of a limit should be cited to a standard textbook on analysis, such as Bartle.

612: 1713:

Sorry. I cannot comprehend your words and some symbols in your writings? Can you tell us in more detail? And what's with those confusing notations, such as NP

1004:(and other incoming links), I have kept an anchor, and added a sentence mentioning the attribution to Arbogast, and the alternative name of Euler's notation. 328: 3075: 2095:

I couldn't relate 1/2 with 21 by mathematics, and as however in all higher dimensional matrix also, A.A = 1. So I give all my chances to the serieses like

1970:

Matrix(A) . Transpose Matrix (A) = 1. It is the agreed one as everyone knows of it. And the matrix concepts falls on the linear algebra & part of the

1238:. If someone has access to the books of the biblography section and the requisite knowledge, this is just a matter of finding pages, to my inexpert mind. 3227: 2171:

gets into a better shape. I am little wise with chemistry and it has its own limit on its applicability, so it can ignored a bit when it goes beyond its

1468: 434: 79: 2960:

an author who studied mathematics at Harvard and has spent decades writing and co-writing well-regarded expositions of science, mathematics, and history

2256:

x - y. Like how we have (a+b) x (a-b), and a, b - vector with same direction but the conjugate (a+ib) x (a-ib). Maybe I am wrong as I am not wise with

3197: 3207: 1977: 266: 2766:

A reputable, scholarly secondary open source for the same material (with checking of content to new source, not just hot-swapping the citations).

1234:

Significant portions, including whole sections and subsections, of this 2007 listing are missing inline citations; the article thus does not meet

1823: 3222: 792: 410: 85: 2667:

template. Instead to have many terms in a hatnote, these terms must be added in the disambiguation page, when there are not already there.

1541: 777:

which contains the stirling numbers of the first kind and the forward difference operator to compute nth derivatives as series. Thoughts?

2263:

I also do not able to comprehend multi dimensional theory so far in my conceptual mind. So he maybe little clear. But in the wrong place

975:

I am actually not sure if Google Scholar statistics should be considered a source for a terminology, but it will be better than nothing.

3139: 3118: 1190: 207: 189: 3187: 2823: 2760:

Repeated references to Gonnick 2012 (The Cartoon Guide to Calculus)—SIX appearances in the critical opening sentences of the article—

1086:

gives 5 criteria for choosing the article title. Neither "Arbogast notation" nor "Euler's notation" satisfy the two first criteria of

607: 44: 3091: 2678: 401: 362: 1874: 3192: 3182: 2819:

Bottom line, we can only see the issue of a locked-in-as-weak article, and do nothing about it except write these long requests.

2305: 1186: 2886:

I just created, where you can work on draft changes. (Or create an account so you can edit any semi-protected page you like.) –

1787: 195: 99: 30: 852:

I would like to add a brief bit about how Issac Newton called the derivative "the flowing quantity" and the notation he used.

601:" in this context, it is a confusing thing to include right after the definition, and should be kept to the notation section. 1171: 104: 20: 2255:

And they way he believes it is either we may have to subtract instead. I mean instead of x + y having minus (-) here -: -->

1565:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1149:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1774:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1442:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

602: 74: 1385:

Thanks to you and to XOR for working on the article. I hope the article will be improved, to the benefit of the readers.

2882:

Can you be more specific about which source you would prefer? If you would like, feel free to copy wikitext to the page

2805:

Specific justification, (2) Presenting URLs for any citation that takes a young academic reader nowhere of value, e.g.—

2375: 1976:

I have checked in the following link, that the slope of the line can be calculated like this as mentioned in the page,-

1390: 1337: 1316:

make the article substantively better, and there are many more valuable improvements that could be made (but also don't

1306: 1243: 1223: 1095: 1041: 337: 2936: 2671: 2644: 1163: 65: 3048: 2971: 3003: 2994:

source for a fact that is encountered well before a course on real analysis should be a textbook on real analysis.

1967:

So at the end, you find the value which is the area of triangle multiplied by 2, not the surface area of triangle.

869: 788: 147: 122: 1497: 2930: 2155:/ formulas has limit by connecting one another way of having mathematical explanations for it and by the ways of 1982:

I had tried a little permutation of the calculation myself, concluding putting it into a two dimensional matrix.

1978:

https://www.khanacademy.org/math/cc-eighth-grade-math/cc-8th-linear-equations-functions/8th-slope/a/slope-formula

247: 135: 131: 127: 158: 1624: 1074: 1024: 980: 966: 936: 2065:, stating the surface is 2 even if the side values are just denoted by value which is equals to 1 and it is a 2336:

complicate (in the whole) than the direct proof. The mention of the chain rule in two variables is therefore

1366:: the discussion of improvement may be found in many places: see at my talk and the talk page of the article 3143: 3122: 2883: 2733: 2371: 1856: 1540:. Questions about the concept of the derivative, rather than what goes in this article, can be posed at the 1509:, but it seems likely different than the article. Hopefully this helps, and I will keep searching for more. 1386: 1359: 1333: 1302: 1239: 1219: 818: 479: 109: 2127: 784: 770:{\displaystyle {\frac {d^{m}}{dx^{m}}}f(x)=m!\sum _{n=m}^{\infty }{\frac {s_{m}^{(n)}}{n!}}\Delta ^{n}f(x)} 2902: 2898: 2827: 2249:

I think the guy simply says i is equals to -1. And I think he doesn't believe mutlti-dimentional concepts.

843: 2268: 565: 3044: 2999: 2981: 2967: 2607: 2058: 1549: 1493: 1464: 1420: 343: 177: 387: 2512:

I believe that the lead should mention early on that there are several related notions referred to as

2452:

in general, but rather the special case of calculus on a one dimensional Euclidean space. Given that,

2275: 2122: 1755: 1710: 1696: 3161: 2846: 2597: 2555: 2237: 1953: 1832: 1722: 1514: 1479: 1428: 1410: 1375: 1275: 780: 2215: 631: 561: 2950: 2909: 2890: 2873: 2602: 2568: 2544: 2386: 2337: 2228: 2140: 1921: 1912: 1324: 1289: 1259: 1070: 1020: 976: 962: 932: 55: 2320:

is more generally applicable. I'm not sure whether it would be better inline or as a footnote. --

904:

need, at least, to be disambiguated. So, I'll change the heading to "D-notation", with a template

409:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2703: 2661: 2497: 2345: 2207: 1537: 1107: 1083: 1056: 1009: 951: 917: 874: 393: 163: 70: 2520:

The classical derivatives of real (complex)-valued functions of single real (complex) variables.

377: 356: 3153: 3088: 2487: 839: 199: 51: 2841:, stating a reliable source consisted of author, year of publishing, and reliable publisher. 1899: 1507: 1370:. In my talk page, me and XOR'easter discussed the improvement in the section of definition. 3067: 3040: 3017: 2995: 2977: 2963: 2686: 2634: 2540:

Umm... if the problem is about the ambiguity meaning, why can't we just extend the usage of

2474: 2406: 2359: 2325: 1545: 1503: 1489: 1460: 1263: 865: 160: 2210:

in all aspects, so we will be in a position to face consequences by all sort, the good the

3157: 2924: 2842: 2551: 2096: 1949: 1718: 1510: 1475: 1424: 1406: 1371: 1271: 907: 864:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a

2942: 991: 892: 3021: 2985: 2920:(2) Presenting URLs for any citation that takes a young academic reader nowhere of value 2787:

replacement sources that make the useless inline citations and their links unnecessary.

2243:

Even I couldn't understand anything out of it over here as they way been said over here

1880: 1741: 1599: 1587: 1518: 1483: 3036: 2947: 2906: 2887: 2869: 2651: 2623: 2612: 2588: 2578: 2459: 2383: 2225: 2137: 1363: 1321: 1298: 1286: 1255: 1235: 3176: 2699: 2493: 2431: 2425: 2341: 2299: 1908: 1632: 1267: 1103: 1066: 1052: 1005: 947: 928: 921: 913: 2901:

protected this page back in 2021 in response to a bout of vandalism by IP editors. @

2252:

Out the linearity and vector, we may have i to z, meaning i, j, k, l, m, n .. q ...,

1217:: Massive effort from Dedhert.Jr and XOR'easter to bring this article up to scratch. 2959: 2838: 2530:

The lead shouldn't give a complete list, just enough to demonstrate the ambiguity.

1048: 500:

After the definition is given, indications on how to read are given. They include

1801: 3084: 3013: 3009: 2682: 2630: 2550:? We may just explain this article is about the derivative in general calculus. 2531: 2470: 2402: 2355: 2321: 2257: 2199: 2178:

I was about to say something before, but got deviated. Here it is — the way how

2156: 2104: 2050: 2046: 1971: 1636: 1583: 406: 2317: 2195: 2100: 2061:. Not only that, however I am not able to recall, 2 is an important number in 1640: 1628: 1455: 1447: 1367: 1156: 1099: 995: 383: 24: 1850: 1783:

During GAR, I removed the hidden online sources while improving the article.

1529:

DX - This is where I could start, where I can put my integral result with .dx

3071: 2463: 2444: 2437: 2070: 1677: 1644: 1575: 1488:

I've trimmed it back to something more reasonable. It still needs sources.

2054: 1648: 2191: 1864: 2211: 2203: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2089: 2062: 2183: 1813: 162: 2152: 2081: 2066: 1889: 1681: 1603: 1320:

to be; as I said it's a fine article). Knock yourself out though. –

3165: 3147: 3126: 2953: 2912: 2893: 2877: 2850: 2831: 2707: 2690: 2638: 2559: 2534: 2501: 2478: 2410: 2389: 2363: 2349: 2329: 2282: 2231: 2218: 2160: 2148: 2143: 2129: 2077: 1957: 1762: 1726: 1703: 1688: 1620: 1432: 1414: 1400:

Some questions from me regarding the improvement of this article:

1394: 1379: 1341: 1327: 1310: 1292: 1279: 1247: 1227: 1111: 1094:. This is the reason for which I changed the heading (here and in 1078: 1060: 1028: 1013: 984: 970: 955: 940: 880: 847: 796: 619: 569: 998:. For avoiding reader's confusion, and not breaking the redirect 632:

https://personal.math.ubc.ca/~cbm/aands/abramowitz_and_stegun.pdf

2943:

An Elementary Treatise on the Differential and Integral Calculus

2456:

does not explain the reason for the reversion. Would you accept

2099:

and the other ones. Other than that slope is always profound by

2619:

Are there any others important enough to warrant a link in the

593:, and reworded a bit. Whether or not there are people who say " 2721: 1692: 1423:. Is it possible to write them down in this article, instead? 806: 467: 308: 164: 15: 3156:

by some IPs and users. That is why the article is protected.

2822:

Signed, a former prof, and former registered editor here.

2115: 2111: 2085: 2049:

that how value been profound. Number 2 is important in the

1571: 2398:

a more general chain rule, not a more detailed discussion.

2187: 2179: 2088:, and as I somehow recalls, number 2 plays vital role in 1748: 1673: 1669: 1654:

dy/dx = <<what's been integrated divided by dx: -->

1595: 1591: 1332:

The second option, then. Thanks for your quick response.

1456:

Total derivative, total differential and Jacobian matrix

1448:

Total derivative, total differential and Jacobian matrix

1419:

Also, I wonder why its applications remain stuck at the

2260:, it's simple someone easily correct & conclude so, 2208:

mathematical proofing and our best logical augmentation

2080:/ 2 is equals to surface of the triangle value, if the 1668:, it's a flaw, it never going to end. as the result is 1586:. On the other side it is a value we can calculate for 1206: 1198: 1167: 1036: 1000: 278: 259: 240: 2107:. And in vector 2 is important. And in matrix A.A = 1 1822:(Govt. of TN), TamilNadu Textbook Corporation (2006), 3008:

How about Calculus texts such as Thomas that go into

2454:

This is about real functions, not about the real line

2267:. Anyway lets talk, nothing harm happens, I believe. 2069:. Even √2 is important. 45° is important as it gives 1939: 640: 2214:

project is the best we survive or yield to the next—

405:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3117:There id no need for this article to be protected. 1627:. Over that everything else continues like finding 1040:must be kept and have the corresponding section of 1034:whichever is the name of the section, the redirect 769: 2775:Repeated appearance of in-citation dead-end URLs 1948:All of these sources here are in the format CS2. 2450:the term as used in calculus on Euclidean spaces 2202:, we may indulge well but we should correct our 891:After my reversion of the change of the heading 803:Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2023 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3213:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Mathematics 3039:that offers the option of buying a print copy. 2718:Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2024 1914:A Brief Introduction to Infinitesimal Calculus 1891:Difference Equations to Differential Equations 1876:Unabridged Version of Sean's Applied Math Book 1751:and around it, is somewhere within my mindset. 205:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 3152:The article's edit history shows the data of 2236:See first of all I don't know anything about 8: 2958:What exactly is wrong with citing a book by 464:Definition section : "df" instead of "dy" ? 1506:I have found the source of the definition 778: 351: 219: 172: 749: 723: 718: 712: 706: 695: 661: 647: 641: 639: 3014:Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul 2683:Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul 2631:Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul 2532:Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul 2471:Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul 2403:Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul 2394:I was suggesting only a note that there 2356:Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul 2322:Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul 3203:Knowledge vital articles in Mathematics 3059: 1582:at the end for what I had found as per 1570:I start when I could plot something in 560:since "y" is not use in the section ? 353: 3218:GA-Class vital articles in Mathematics 3032: 2919: 2837:Apologies, but we do have a guideline 2677:What about the related algebraic term 2453: 2442: 2435: 2271:by philosophy or may be by me. Thanks! 896: 2462:|the term as used in the calculus of 2190:is less important I feel, I mean the 7: 2796:Please check this 3 of 17 contention 2436:the term as used in calculus on the 2092:, I feel I can connect 21 with 1/2. 1590:(change in y - ) instead of a rigid 1561:The following discussion is closed. 1145:The following discussion is closed. 399:This article is within the scope of 314: 312: 1658:As per me, I go with dy/dx = 1 = NP 634:, page 824) should be added here: 23:for discussing improvements to the 3035:is not a "book sale site"; it's a 2937:Differential and Integral Calculus 2931:Differential and Integral Calculus 2777:in the opening 15 inline citations 2584:? Which of these should be in the 2198:, or by any different chapters of 1421:Differential calculus#Applications 746: 707: 14: 3228:Top-priority mathematics articles 2925:A Course in Mathematical Analysis 2448:. Also, the article is not about 2401:Thanks for telling me about ] -- 2382:heading in this article points. – 2206:in all sense. So, let's get into 630:I think the formula from Stegun ( 419:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 198:. If you can improve it further, 3198:Knowledge level-4 vital articles 2858: 2725: 2306:Special:PermanentLink/1201066147 2084:is intact and the field is just 1770:The discussion above is closed. 1732:this, it is somewhat meaningful. 1594:. It is nothing but a change in 1438:The discussion above is closed. 886: 856: 810: 576: 471: 422:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 386: 376: 355: 322: 313: 176: 146: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3208:GA-Class level-4 vital articles 1923:The Notation of Differentiation 1578:). As I could do that, I apply 1207:Watch article reassessment page 912:and a note on the attribution. 439:This article has been rated as 3166:03:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 3148:21:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3127:21:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2378:which is where the wikilinked 881:00:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC) 848:23:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC) 797:19:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC) 764: 758: 730: 724: 679: 673: 626:Formula for the nth derivative 342:It is of interest to multiple 186:has been listed as one of the 1: 3223:GA-Class mathematics articles 3049:22:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 3022:12:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 3004:20:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2986:18:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2972:06:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2954:02:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2913:01:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2894:01:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2878:00:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2851:00:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2832:21:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1958:04:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC) 1763:12:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1727:03:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1704:19:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC) 1554:16:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC) 1519:01:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC) 1498:17:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC) 1484:13:28, 17 December 2023 (UTC) 1469:03:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC) 1433:02:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC) 1415:02:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC) 1395:03:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 1380:03:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 1342:03:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 1328:02:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 1311:01:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 1293:20:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC) 1280:01:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC) 1248:00:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC) 413:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2502:17:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC) 2479:17:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC) 2411:19:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2390:16:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2376:Linearity of differentiation 2364:19:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2350:16:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2330:16:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2232:00:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC) 2219:19:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC) 2167:must evolve by this way, so 2144:23:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC) 2130:20:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC) 2076:And as you found a value of 2030:(x1 x y2) - (x2 x y1) =: --> 1852:Notes on First-Year Calculus 1664:When I give a chance like NP 1228:21:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC) 1096:Notation for differentiation 1042:Notation for differentiation 620:18:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC) 570:13:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC) 2748:to reactivate your request. 2736:has been answered. Set the 2672:Derivative (disambiguation) 2645:Derivative (disambiguation) 2535:12:38, 6 August 2024‎ (UTC) 2508:Lead: what is a derivative? 2045:At the end I am missing my 1735:y = value_of_inegral (1.dx) 1672:, as per me it is just not 1619:Further I am going to find 1112:10:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC) 1079:20:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC) 1061:08:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC) 1029:04:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC) 1014:20:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 985:20:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 971:20:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 956:18:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 941:17:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 922:14:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 887:Arbogast's/Euler's notation 833:to reactivate your request. 821:has been answered. Set the 494:to reactivate your request. 482:has been answered. Set the 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3244: 2708:09:19, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 2691:10:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 2639:18:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 2560:15:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 2274:—20:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC) 1812:Crowell, Benjamin (2017), 3188:Mathematics good articles 2647:. So, none must be in an 2245:"Not able to comprehend". 1802:Resources in your library 1625:first order of derivative 1609:Δy = integral_value . dx 438: 371: 350: 295: 286:Good article reassessment 267:Good article reassessment 222: 218: 190:Mathematics good articles 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2523:The covariant derivative 2443:the term as used on the 2283:20:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC) 2031:(1 x 7) - (7 x 4) =: --> 2012:y2 - y1 / x2 - x1 =: --> 1898:Strang, Gilbert (1991), 1815:Fundamentals of Calculus 1772:Please do not modify it. 1563:Please do not modify it. 1440:Please do not modify it. 1147:Please do not modify it. 445:project's priority scale 3193:GA-Class vital articles 3183:Knowledge good articles 2940:or even Lacroix (1816) 2884:Talk:Derivative/Sandbox 2372:special:diff/1201288095 1888:Sloughter, Dan (2000), 1863:Hussain, Faraz (2006), 1857:University of Minnesota 1538:off-topic for this page 402:WikiProject Mathematics 2159:. Before getting into 1866:Understanding Calculus 1849:Garrett, Paul (2004), 1270:for more comments???? 1210:• GAN review not found 990:for changing headings 866:"change X to Y" format 771: 711: 75:avoid personal attacks 3068:Thomas, George B. Jr. 2608:Functional derivative 1387:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1334:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1303:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1240:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1220:~~ AirshipJungleman29 772: 691: 329:level-4 vital article 196:good article criteria 140:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 3070:; Weir, Maurice D.; 3037:free online textbook 2598:Covariant derivative 2430:With regard to edit 2370:(Aside: a link like 2013:7 - 4 / 7 - 1 =: --> 1873:Mauch, Sean (2004), 1680:collapses by muting 1643:, whether the value 638: 425:mathematics articles 248:Good article nominee 105:No original research 2603:Exterior derivative 2269:Conclusion is final 1738:It is a change. So, 1687:Let's have a great 1102:of 8 August 2005‎. 910:|Euler's notation}} 734: 3083:(Thirteenth ed.). 3033:Strang et al. 2023 2990:I don't think the 2934:, Piskunov (1969) 2526:The Lie derivative 2059:binary base system 1825:Mathematics- vol.2 1676:rather Na, so the 1564: 1360:AirshipJungleman29 1148: 992:§ Euler's notation 893:§ Euler's notation 767: 714: 394:Mathematics portal 338:content assessment 223:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 3113:Remove protection 3077:Thomas's Calculus 2928:, Courant (1937) 2903:Materialscientist 2899:Materialscientist 2790:Justifications: 2772:2F. Change from: 2757:1F. Change from: 2752: 2751: 2182:is important and 2073:between x and y. 2019:If it is a Matrix 1909:Stroyan, Keith D. 1788:Library resources 1562: 1146: 895:, I received the 837: 836: 799: 783:comment added by 743: 668: 618: 498: 497: 459: 458: 455: 454: 451: 450: 307: 306: 303: 302: 260:September 9, 2007 214: 171: 170: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3235: 3105: 3104: 3102: 3100: 3082: 3064: 2866: 2862: 2861: 2763:1T. Change to: 2743: 2739: 2729: 2728: 2722: 2666: 2660: 2656: 2650: 2643:There is a page 2628: 2622: 2593: 2587: 2583: 2577: 2573: 2567: 2549: 2543: 2491: 2468: 2429: 2314:all real numbers 2303: 2125: 2110:Let's step into 2103:, a division of 1944: 1934: 1933: 1931: 1917: 1904: 1894: 1884: 1879:, archived from 1869: 1859: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1837: 1831:, archived from 1830: 1818: 1297:Just to clarify 1236:GA criterion 2b) 1218: 1209: 1203: 1194: 1175: 1039: 1037:Euler's notation 1003: 1001:Euler's notation 911: 877: 872:if appropriate. 860: 859: 828: 824: 814: 813: 807: 785:Onlineuser577215 776: 774: 773: 768: 754: 753: 744: 742: 733: 722: 713: 710: 705: 669: 667: 666: 665: 652: 651: 642: 617: 605: 584: 580: 579: 489: 485: 475: 474: 468: 427: 426: 423: 420: 417: 396: 391: 390: 380: 373: 372: 367: 359: 352: 335: 326: 325: 318: 317: 316: 309: 296:Current status: 281: 279:January 10, 2024 262: 243: 241:October 10, 2006 220: 203: 180: 173: 165: 151: 150: 141: 95:Article policies 16: 3243: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3173: 3172: 3115: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3098: 3096: 3094: 3080: 3066: 3065: 3061: 2859: 2857: 2809: 2783:2T. Change to: 2741: 2737: 2726: 2720: 2664: 2658: 2654: 2648: 2626: 2620: 2591: 2585: 2581: 2575: 2571: 2565: 2547: 2541: 2510: 2485: 2457: 2423: 2421: 2297: 2295: 2293:Chain rule edit 2265:Talk:Derivative 2238:Jacobian Matrix 2123: 2097:harmonic series 1965: 1937: 1929: 1927: 1920: 1907: 1897: 1887: 1872: 1862: 1848: 1841: 1839: 1835: 1828: 1821: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1796: 1781: 1776: 1775: 1716: 1667: 1661: 1615: 1567: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1531: 1452: 1444: 1443: 1356: 1354:More discussion 1213: 1205: 1184: 1161: 1155: 1151: 1141: 1134: 1132:GA Reassessment 1088:recognizability 1035: 999: 961:to call it so. 905: 889: 875: 870:reliable source 857: 850: 826: 822: 811: 805: 745: 735: 657: 653: 643: 636: 635: 628: 606: 577: 575: 487: 483: 472: 466: 424: 421: 418: 415: 414: 392: 385: 365: 336:on Knowledge's 333: 323: 277: 258: 239: 167: 166: 161: 138: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3241: 3239: 3231: 3230: 3225: 3220: 3215: 3210: 3205: 3200: 3195: 3190: 3185: 3175: 3174: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3114: 3111: 3107: 3106: 3092: 3058: 3057: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 2956: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2880: 2854: 2853: 2807: 2782: 2750: 2749: 2730: 2719: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2675: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2613:Lie derivative 2610: 2605: 2600: 2528: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2509: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2420: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2399: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2294: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2272: 2261: 2253: 2250: 2247: 2241: 2234: 2176: 2043: 2042: 2039: 2027: 2026: 2023: 2020: 2009: 2008: 2005: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1990: 1987: 1964: 1961: 1946: 1945: 1935: 1918: 1905: 1895: 1885: 1870: 1860: 1846: 1819: 1805: 1804: 1798: 1797: 1795: 1791: 1786: 1785: 1780: 1779:Online sources 1777: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1752: 1745: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1714: 1691:ever with our 1665: 1659: 1613: 1568: 1559: 1542:reference desk 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1451: 1445: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1417: 1398: 1397: 1355: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1282: 1260:David Eppstein 1232: 1231: 1230: 1211: 1152: 1143: 1142: 1140: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1071:Alexey Muranov 1045: 1021:Alexey Muranov 977:Alexey Muranov 973: 963:Alexey Muranov 933:Alexey Muranov 888: 885: 884: 883: 868:and provide a 838: 835: 834: 815: 804: 801: 766: 763: 760: 757: 752: 748: 741: 738: 732: 729: 726: 721: 717: 709: 704: 701: 698: 694: 690: 687: 684: 681: 678: 675: 672: 664: 660: 656: 650: 646: 627: 624: 623: 622: 530:should it be 496: 495: 476: 465: 462: 457: 456: 453: 452: 449: 448: 437: 431: 430: 428: 411:the discussion 398: 397: 381: 369: 368: 360: 348: 347: 341: 319: 305: 304: 301: 300: 293: 292: 289: 282: 274: 273: 270: 263: 255: 254: 251: 244: 236: 235: 232: 229: 225: 224: 216: 215: 181: 169: 168: 159: 157: 156: 153: 152: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3240: 3229: 3226: 3224: 3221: 3219: 3216: 3214: 3211: 3209: 3206: 3204: 3201: 3199: 3196: 3194: 3191: 3189: 3186: 3184: 3181: 3180: 3178: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3140:107.119.57.63 3138: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3119:107.119.57.63 3112: 3095: 3093:0-321-87896-5 3090: 3086: 3079: 3078: 3073: 3069: 3063: 3060: 3056: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3031: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2955: 2952: 2949: 2945: 2944: 2939: 2938: 2933: 2932: 2927: 2926: 2921: 2918: 2914: 2911: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2865: 2856: 2855: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2820: 2817: 2813: 2806: 2803: 2799: 2797: 2791: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2778: 2773: 2770: 2767: 2764: 2761: 2758: 2755: 2747: 2744:parameter to 2735: 2731: 2724: 2723: 2717: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2673: 2670:I've updated 2669: 2668: 2663: 2653: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2625: 2618: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2590: 2580: 2570: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2546: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2533: 2525: 2522: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2515: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2489: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2465: 2461: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2440: 2439: 2433: 2432:special:diff/ 2427: 2418: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2397: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2388: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2338:too technical 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2301: 2292: 2284: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2254: 2251: 2248: 2246: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2151:solutions by 2150: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2142: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2119: 2117: 2113: 2108: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2093: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2057:field act as 2056: 2052: 2048: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2032:7 - 28 =: --> 2024: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2006: 2003: 2000: 1997: 1994: 1991: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1980: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1962: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1943: 1942: 1936: 1925: 1924: 1919: 1916: 1915: 1910: 1906: 1903: 1902: 1896: 1893: 1892: 1886: 1883:on 2006-04-15 1882: 1878: 1877: 1871: 1868: 1867: 1861: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1847: 1838:on 2016-01-15 1834: 1827: 1826: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1810: 1809: 1803: 1800: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1784: 1778: 1773: 1764: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1717:, and so on? 1712: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1662: 1656: 1652: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633:discontinuity 1630: 1626: 1622: 1617: 1610: 1607: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1566: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1528: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1457: 1449: 1446: 1441: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1353: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1323: 1319: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1283: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1159: 1154: 1153: 1150: 1139: 1136: 1131: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1038: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1002: 997: 993: 988: 987: 986: 982: 978: 974: 972: 968: 964: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 944: 943: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 925: 924: 923: 919: 915: 909: 901: 899: 894: 882: 879: 878: 871: 867: 863: 855: 854: 853: 849: 845: 841: 832: 829:parameter to 820: 816: 809: 808: 802: 800: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 761: 755: 750: 739: 736: 727: 719: 715: 702: 699: 696: 692: 688: 685: 682: 676: 670: 662: 658: 654: 648: 644: 633: 625: 621: 616: 615: 611: 610: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 583: 574: 573: 572: 571: 567: 563: 558: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 531: 528: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 501: 493: 490:parameter to 481: 477: 470: 469: 463: 461: 446: 442: 436: 433: 432: 429: 412: 408: 404: 403: 395: 389: 384: 382: 379: 375: 374: 370: 364: 361: 358: 354: 349: 345: 339: 331: 330: 320: 311: 310: 299: 294: 290: 288: 287: 283: 280: 276: 275: 271: 269: 268: 264: 261: 257: 256: 252: 250: 249: 245: 242: 238: 237: 233: 230: 227: 226: 221: 217: 212: 210: 209: 201: 197: 193: 192: 191: 185: 182: 179: 175: 174: 155: 154: 149: 145: 137: 133: 129: 126: 124: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3154:edit-warring 3116: 3099:September 9, 3097:. Retrieved 3076: 3062: 3054: 2991: 2941: 2935: 2929: 2923: 2863: 2824:98.193.42.97 2821: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2804: 2800: 2795: 2792: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2776: 2774: 2771: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2759: 2756: 2753: 2745: 2734:edit request 2529: 2513: 2511: 2449: 2422: 2395: 2379: 2313: 2309: 2296: 2278:BramStoker's 2277: 2276: 2264: 2244: 2149:Mathematical 2120: 2109: 2094: 2075: 2044: 2029:Slope =: --> 2028: 2014:3 / 6 =: --> 2011:Slope =: --> 2010: 1981: 1975: 1969: 1966: 1947: 1940: 1928:, retrieved 1922: 1913: 1900: 1890: 1881:the original 1875: 1865: 1851: 1840:, retrieved 1833:the original 1824: 1814: 1792: 1782: 1771: 1758:BramStoker's 1757: 1756: 1699:BramStoker's 1698: 1697: 1686: 1663: 1657: 1653: 1618: 1611: 1608: 1579: 1569: 1560: 1453: 1439: 1399: 1357: 1317: 1233: 1214: 1199: 1195: 1181:Article talk 1180: 1179: 1176: 1157: 1144: 1091: 1087: 1044:as a target. 996:§ D-notation 902: 890: 873: 861: 851: 840:Researchrush 830: 819:edit request 779:— Preceding 629: 613: 608: 598: 594: 590: 586: 581: 559: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 532: 529: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 502: 499: 491: 480:edit request 460: 441:Top-priority 440: 400: 366:Top‑priority 344:WikiProjects 327: 298:Good article 297: 284: 265: 246: 206: 204: 200:please do so 188: 187: 183: 143: 121: 94: 19:This is the 3085:Pearson PLC 3010:Epsilontics 2978:Tito Omburo 2564:Or replace 2258:Mathematics 2200:mathematics 2157:mathematics 2124:BilkTheHulk 2105:mathematics 2051:mathematics 2047:mathematics 2033:- 21 =: --> 1972:mathematics 1938:Wikibooks, 1926:, MIT, 1998 1711:BramStokers 1637:convergence 1623:that's the 1584:mathematics 1576:Dimensional 1536:Closing as 1168:visual edit 1092:naturalness 1084:WP:CRITERIA 416:Mathematics 407:mathematics 363:Mathematics 31:not a forum 3177:Categories 3158:Dedhert.Jr 3072:Hass, Joel 3055:References 3041:XOR'easter 2996:XOR'easter 2964:XOR'easter 2843:Dedhert.Jr 2738:|answered= 2679:derivation 2569:other uses 2552:Dedhert.Jr 2545:other uses 2514:derivative 2434:, I wrote 2318:chain rule 2196:derivative 2118:any more. 2101:derivative 1950:Dedhert.Jr 1930:24 October 1842:2014-11-29 1793:Derivative 1719:Dedhert.Jr 1641:divergence 1635:, finding 1629:continuity 1546:XOR'easter 1511:Dedhert.Jr 1504:XOR'easter 1490:XOR'easter 1476:Dedhert.Jr 1461:XOR'easter 1425:Dedhert.Jr 1407:Dedhert.Jr 1372:Dedhert.Jr 1368:Derivative 1272:Dedhert.Jr 1264:XOR'easter 1138:Derivative 1100:derivative 823:|answered= 603:small jars 484:|answered= 194:under the 184:Derivative 25:Derivative 2948:jacobolus 2907:jacobolus 2888:jacobolus 2662:other use 2516:, e.g., 2445:Real line 2438:Real line 2384:jacobolus 2310:constants 2226:jacobolus 2216:AtTEnigma 2138:jacobolus 2071:bijection 1747:Thinking 1678:integrity 1645:converges 1364:Jacobolus 1322:jacobolus 1299:jacobolus 1287:jacobolus 1256:Jacobolus 862:Not done: 562:Padelsart 332:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3074:(2014). 2864:Not done 2700:D.Lazard 2494:D.Lazard 2488:Otheruse 2426:D.Lazard 2380:sum rule 2342:D.Lazard 2312:back to 2308:changes 2300:D.Lazard 2212:FLAMINGO 2055:computer 2053:also in 2041:|x1, y1| 2038:|x, y| 2025:|x2, y2| 2022:|x1, y1| 1989:|x2, y2| 1986:|x1, y1| 1941:Calculus 1911:(1997), 1901:Calculus 1649:diverges 1268:D.Lazard 1104:D.Lazard 1067:D.Lazard 1053:D.Lazard 1006:D.Lazard 948:D.Lazard 929:D.Lazard 914:D.Lazard 793:contribs 781:unsigned 334:GA-class 208:reassess 144:730 days 123:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2204:context 2194:. From 2173:context 2169:physics 2165:science 2114:not by 2090:vectors 2063:vectors 1612:Δy = NP 1450:section 1191:history 1172:history 1158:Article 585:Chaged 545:", or " 515:", or " 443:on the 231:Process 2769:————— 2754:————— 2467:uses}} 2441:, not 2340:here. 2153:method 2082:z-axis 2067:vector 2015:1 / 2 2007:y2 = 7 2004:y1 = 4 2001:x2 = 7 1998:x1 = 1 1995:|7, 7| 1992:|1, 4| 1790:about 1682:within 1215:Result 908:anchor 340:scale. 253:Listed 234:Result 3081:(PDF) 3012:? -- 2839:WP:RS 2742:|ans= 2732:This 2681:? -- 2652:about 2629:? -- 2624:about 2589:about 2579:about 2574:with 2469:? -- 2460:about 2419:About 2304:Edit 2161:higgs 2078:delta 1963:Slope 1836:(PDF) 1829:(PDF) 1689:earth 1655:: --> 1621:dy/dx 1616:. dx 1604:f'(x) 1200:Watch 1049:WP:OR 898:(UTC) 827:|ans= 817:This 549:over 519:over 488:|ans= 478:This 321:This 84:Seek 3162:talk 3144:talk 3123:talk 3101:2024 3089:ISBN 3045:talk 3018:talk 3000:talk 2992:only 2982:talk 2968:talk 2874:talk 2847:talk 2828:talk 2704:talk 2687:talk 2635:talk 2556:talk 2498:talk 2475:talk 2464:real 2407:talk 2360:talk 2346:talk 2326:talk 1954:talk 1932:2012 1744:= dx 1723:talk 1550:talk 1515:talk 1494:talk 1480:talk 1465:talk 1454:The 1429:talk 1411:talk 1391:talk 1376:talk 1338:talk 1318:have 1307:talk 1276:talk 1244:talk 1224:talk 1187:edit 1164:edit 1108:talk 1090:and 1075:talk 1057:talk 1025:talk 1010:talk 981:talk 967:talk 952:talk 937:talk 918:talk 844:talk 789:talk 582:Done 566:talk 291:Kept 272:Kept 228:Date 73:and 2951:(t) 2946:. – 2910:(t) 2891:(t) 2870:JBL 2740:or 2657:or 2396:was 2387:(t) 2229:(t) 2192:√-1 2141:(t) 2034:21 1693:sun 1684:. 1651:. 1647:or 1580:.dx 1574:(3- 1362:, @ 1325:(t) 1290:(t) 1266:, @ 1262:, @ 1258:, @ 994:to 900:. 876:JTP 825:or 597:by 589:to 553:at 541:at 537:by 523:at 511:at 507:by 486:or 435:Top 3179:: 3164:) 3146:) 3134:is 3125:) 3087:. 3047:) 3020:) 3002:) 2984:) 2970:) 2962:? 2876:) 2868:-- 2849:) 2830:) 2746:no 2706:) 2689:) 2665:}} 2659:{{ 2655:}} 2649:{{ 2637:) 2627:}} 2621:{{ 2594:? 2592:}} 2586:{{ 2582:}} 2576:{{ 2572:}} 2566:{{ 2558:) 2548:}} 2542:{{ 2500:) 2492:. 2490:}} 2486:{{ 2477:) 2458:{{ 2409:) 2362:) 2348:) 2328:) 2186:, 2184:√2 2163:, 2116:2D 2112:3D 2086:2D 1956:) 1855:, 1742:Δy 1725:) 1695:.— 1639:, 1631:, 1606:. 1602:- 1600:Δy 1598:- 1588:Δy 1572:3D 1552:) 1544:. 1517:) 1496:) 1482:) 1467:) 1431:) 1413:) 1393:) 1378:) 1340:) 1309:) 1278:) 1246:) 1226:) 1204:• 1189:| 1170:| 1166:| 1110:) 1077:) 1059:) 1027:) 1012:) 983:) 969:) 954:) 939:) 920:) 906:{{ 846:) 831:no 795:) 791:• 747:Δ 708:∞ 693:∑ 599:dx 595:dy 587:dy 568:) 557:" 551:dx 547:df 539:dx 535:df 527:" 521:dx 517:dy 509:dx 505:dy 492:no 211:it 202:. 142:: 134:, 130:, 54:; 3160:( 3142:( 3121:( 3103:. 3043:( 3016:( 2998:( 2980:( 2966:( 2872:( 2845:( 2826:( 2702:( 2685:( 2674:. 2633:( 2554:( 2496:( 2473:( 2428:: 2424:@ 2405:( 2358:( 2344:( 2324:( 2302:: 2298:@ 2240:. 2224:– 2188:i 2180:2 2175:. 2136:– 2121:— 1952:( 1754:— 1749:1 1721:( 1715:0 1709:@ 1674:n 1670:n 1666:1 1660:0 1614:r 1596:y 1592:y 1548:( 1513:( 1502:@ 1492:( 1478:( 1463:( 1427:( 1409:( 1389:( 1374:( 1358:@ 1336:( 1305:( 1274:( 1242:( 1222:( 1196:· 1193:) 1185:( 1177:· 1174:) 1162:( 1106:( 1073:( 1065:@ 1055:( 1023:( 1008:( 979:( 965:( 950:( 935:( 927:@ 916:( 842:( 787:( 765:) 762:x 759:( 756:f 751:n 740:! 737:n 731:) 728:n 725:( 720:m 716:s 703:m 700:= 697:n 689:! 686:m 683:= 680:) 677:x 674:( 671:f 663:m 659:x 655:d 649:m 645:d 614:c 609:t 591:f 564:( 555:a 543:a 533:" 525:a 513:a 503:" 447:. 346:. 213:. 136:3 132:2 128:1 125:: 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index