Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Dutch colonial empire

Source đź“ť

1567:
constituent country of the Netherlands? it doesn't make any sense. I have searched a keyword for the dutch empire lifespan, indeed most of them says it ends in 1975, but most of them don't even recount the event of the Kingdom charter which happened in 1954, the charter established equal status for the remaining colonies of the Netherlands, and of course New Guinea was an exception, it was still a colony around the same time. So when does it really ends? when suriname gained independence and became republic, no significant change happened to the kingdom status except its losing a territory. In 1986 Aruba gained status aparte and seceede from the Netherlands Antilles, and 24 years later the Netherlands Antilles dissolved, Curacao and Sint Maarten gained the same status as Aruba, while the BES became Netherlands muncipality, it was the last significant changes in the entire Empire's history.
1734:; you could have easily checked that in the edit history. If you don't like the tags, you should provide the citations that are asked for, or remove the claims if they cannot be supported by citations instead of removing the tags. Problems don't cease to exist if you ignore them and pretend they're not there. Of the 46 tags I placed on 16 April 2023, 5 have apparently been addressed and removed, but the remaining 41 evidently haven't, so it's inappropriate to remove them. I'm going to restore them, and wish you good luck to providing RS for each of them if you're interested in improving this article. Good day, 1412:– see topic directly above. It better reflects historiography's preference and avoids suggesting greater formal and factual state control over the Dutch West India Company (WIC) and Dutch East India Company (VOC) than was actually the case. The VOC and WIC were quasi-state-in-a-state organizations, and the Dutch Republic was ultimately responsible and accountable for their actions. "Dutch empire" is often written with a lowercase e in English-language literature. See the examples of the French, German, and Belgian colonial empires. "British Empire" is a well-established exception that confirms the rule. 1299:(or "Republic of the Seven United Netherlands", as it is clumsily known in modern Dutch historiography). Moreover, WIC and especially the VOC holdings were not directly subject to the state, as the VOC operated as a quasi-state-in-a-state, with authority such as a monopoly on violence including the right to wage war, set up fortresses, appoint governors, a monopoly on trade including the right to conclude trade agreements etc. without approval from the States-General or the Stadtholder or anything. The name "Dutch Empire" capital 1004: 307: 1217:
Guiana. I changed 'Dutch Guiana' to 'Suriname', because the only colony in the Guianas, possessed by the Dutch after World War II was Suriname. I'd also like to point out that Dutch Guiana as a colony or country has never existed. Surinam has always been officially known as such or as Suriname, in both Dutch and English, the colony was often unofficially and semi-officially referred to as Dutch Guiana in the 19th and 20th century, in an analogy to British Guiana and French Guiana.
1180: 463: 445: 473: 663: 642: 1020: 1086: 673: 554: 533: 765: 747: 564: 1053: 227: 889: 361: 340: 298: 1447:: A colonial empire is a very specific type of empire and for the sake of precision the title should reflect that. That the Netherlands, Belgium and Portugal (and Italy for that matter) never ruled over any other empire than a colonial empire is no reason not to include the word colonial in the title. It is a fact that "British Empire" is a well-established exception.-- 961: 950: 939: 928: 917: 1036: 371: 1133: 847: 811: 1303:
suggests a much larger formal and factual state control over VOC and WIC activities and colonial possessions than was factually the case, even though the Dutch state, the Republic, was ultimately responsible and accountable for lots of things (including committing colonial atrocities) the VOC and WIC
1704:
is categorised as "American people of Dutch descent", but it's not mentioned let alone supported anywhere in the article. More importantly, even if we find sources for the claim (which I find likely, because it's a Dutch surname), is there any reason to claim that their existence is a direct legacy
1216:
I recently made an edit to this article. It was in the "introduction" or "preface", the fourth paragraph, the second sentence. The sentence reads: Nevertheless, major portions of the empire survived until the advent of global decolonization following World War II, namely the East Indies and Dutch
1610:
I don't see how the fact hat FD Roosevelt was the only US president to serve more than two terms or that Belgium won its independence in consequence of the 1830 revolution are likely to be challenged. Moreover, I checked some of the claims at random and saw that they are supported by the linked
1566:
I have noticed that around this december, the infobox and the sub section states that the Dutch Empire ends in 1975? for what reason? does the independence of Suriname as republic suddenly changed the empire status while Antilles was still around having the same status as suriname when it was a
1511:
I find it strange that the article makes no mention of the Dutch dominance of North European ship-building in the 16th and 17th century. Many ships built in their yards were for customers in other countries. The Dutch not only invented new types of ship, such as the
1573: 1027: 825: 1011: 821: 1043: 829: 1648:
was a lot "earlier". Without further explanation or sourcing, this is a very arbitrary assertion that is inappropriate, especially in the lead section that should summarise the main body, where this claim is not further
153: 1691:
The Roosevelt sentence is not about whether FDR served more than two terms; it is about the entire sentence claiming that Martin Van Buren, Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt were of Dutch descent. Only the
1060: 833: 240: 1220:
However, this change was reverted by user Davidelit. I'd thought of bringing this up here, because Dutch Guiana never existed and the right name for the colony they possessed at the time is Suriname.
276: 1519:
Clearly, the Dutch colonies relied on long-distance maritime transport. You can't do that without ships – and you may well need customised designs to meet the requirements of lengthy voyages.
1755: 1917: 1797: 1892: 1721:
a direct legacy of Dutch colonialism). This link needs to be established by RS in order for the whole sentence to have any added value, otherwise it's an irrelevant random fact.
147: 902: 859: 1887: 1882: 1570:
If anyone would assume that the Dutch empire ended in 1975, please state your opinion here before we're reaching a concensus here's what you might wanna see as references:
1516:, but they also introduced new technology, such as the windmill driven sawmill. They could produce ships at much lower cost (the sawmill being one reason for big savings). 1754:
There is no mention to colonial times other than superficial mention, no mention of slavery. No mention of traded Africans, and plantations. Biased and not factually true
1644:
is non-trivial, and it appears that it is not addressed anywhere else in the article either. What is meant by "empire", "earliest", "wealthiest", "nations" etc.? E.g. the
1902: 1383: 777: 1877: 888: 729: 776:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please 1787: 1897: 1867: 1852: 719: 44: 624: 79: 1782: 1912: 1637:, it has lots of issues with it, and my tags are part of highlighting those issues to readers and editors as a caution for using and further improving it. 427: 311: 1872: 1857: 1837: 1827: 1802: 614: 695: 1545: 854: 816: 772: 752: 499: 1907: 1862: 1812: 417: 236: 85: 1842: 1792: 590: 1847: 1611:
articles. Finally, the lead section should summarize the article, so that - in a good article - it shouldn't have any inline citations at all.
1822: 1817: 863: 686: 647: 393: 198: 194: 190: 30: 1230: 495: 486: 450: 1642:
The Dutch were among the earliest empire-builders of Europe, following Spain and Portugal and one of the wealthiest nations of that time.
1368:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1832: 1394: 239:. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the 577: 538: 99: 1807: 1759: 168: 104: 20: 135: 1198: 384: 345: 74: 1777: 1717:
colony existed, and not from post-1674 migration (which includes a lot of other Dutch-American families whose descendants are
320: 65: 1502:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1359: 1186: 1115: 129: 1739: 1488: 1317: 1111: 1263:
in Europe). This is a fundamentally colonial topic, as the infobox and categories show. Dutch historiography prefers
1224: 1527: 185: 1634: 1335:(where there is no distinction between overseas and non-overseas empires, unlike in the French and German cases). 226: 125: 109: 207: 1237: 589:
topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1369: 326: 175: 1685: 1552: 1389: 1332: 858:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 1735: 1597: 1484: 1328: 1313: 1252: 1158: 1119: 55: 1697: 1523: 1409: 1194: 694:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
392:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
24: 1231:
https://inter-antiquariaat.nl/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/06/SurinameLavauxDeLeth1-1-640x438.jpg
70: 1668:, because it will by definition not be supported by official documents. Anyone can claim anything was 1654:
The union lasted just 15 years. In 1830, a revolution in the southern half of the country led to the
1304:
did. I also see in English-language literature that "Dutch empire" is often written with a lowercase
1260: 297: 1471: 1452: 1256: 1166: 678: 161: 141: 1372:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1701: 1581: 1548: 1234: 586: 478: 212: 1003: 1710: 1616: 1165:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
51: 1706: 1693: 1435: 1145: 1094: 569: 209: 1688:, so legally speaking the union lasted 24 years, which is quite a lot longer than 15 years. 1665: 1085: 1417: 1340: 1608:
any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations.
1726:
In summary: of all the examples you've given, I had a good reason to demand a citation.
1676:
ruler of country X" is a notoriously challengeable claim), but Knowledge (XXG) requires
462: 444: 1714: 1467: 1448: 1296: 1276: 1264: 1019: 376: 1677: 1603: 1771: 1577: 662: 641: 1645: 1627: 1612: 1405: 1327:
I concur. This aligns with the precedent set by the French example, as well as the
691: 1225:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dBWImyKJk4&t=30s&ab_channel=WanKowruWinti
1653: 1641: 211: 1763: 1743: 1620: 1585: 1556: 1531: 1492: 1475: 1456: 1439: 1431: 1421: 1399: 1344: 1321: 764: 746: 553: 532: 491: 1413: 1336: 1052: 668: 559: 468: 366: 1602:
I just removed all the "citation needed" tags you placed here one year ago.
1238:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/95/03/d7/9503d753126e33ff52e3f05a84659cba.jpg
582: 1705:
of the Dutch colonial empire? I just checked, and it seems that indeed the
1571: 1110:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 1223:
Even in Dutch documentaries from that time you can see it was 'Suriname':
360: 339: 1575: 1541:
should the apologies for the colonial past be mentioned in the history?
1537:
should the apologies for the colonial past be mentioned in the history?
1153:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
389: 1035: 490:, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the 846: 810: 388:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of 1713:'s ancestor Cornelis Maessen in 1631, as Dutch colonists when the 1513: 1295:) was never an officially used title, the "home country" was the 494:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, visit the
1235:
https://content.wdl.org/11334/thumbnail/1404324078/616x510.jpg
1174: 1127: 1080: 291: 213: 15: 1700:
article never does, and he is not even categorised as such;
1051: 1034: 1018: 1002: 887: 1696:
article claims this explicitly with RS to back it up. The
1522:
Is none of this covered in sources used by the article?
1731: 1727: 1190: 1185:
On 22 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be
269: 160: 900:
This article has been checked against the following
690:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 581:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 498:
where you can join the project or contribute to the
985: 899: 174: 1918:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use American English 1546:nl:Nederlandse excuses voor het koloniale verleden 1466:. Support in principle. Although I am wondering 1798:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in History 1709:came to North America between 1638 and 1649, and 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1664:in it but without a source is almost certainly 1652:About Belgian independence, the passage says: 1893:European military history task force articles 1750:no mentioning to colonial history and slavery 1672:the case (especially that "so-and-so was the 8: 872:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 786:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Former countries 1684:Belgium did not achieve independence until 1507:No mention of Dutch ship-building dominance 1888:B-Class European military history articles 1883:Dutch military history task force articles 1358:The following is a closed discussion of a 1098:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 982: 896: 805: 741: 636: 527: 439: 334: 248: 221: 1788:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in History 1658:independence of the new state of Belgium. 1903:Early Modern warfare task force articles 852:This article is within the scope of the 704:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject South Africa 1878:B-Class Dutch military history articles 807: 743: 638: 529: 508:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Netherlands 484:This article falls within the scope of 441: 336: 295: 1783:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 1607: 862:. To use this banner, please see the 1898:B-Class Early Modern warfare articles 1868:WikiProject Former countries articles 1118:, this should not be changed without 875:Template:WikiProject Military history 789:Template:WikiProject Former countries 599:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Indonesia 7: 1853:Mid-importance South Africa articles 1756:2A02:3037:209:C2:14A1:5868:C501:DBE7 1377:The result of the move request was: 1028:European military history task force 770:This article is within the scope of 684:This article is within the scope of 575:This article is within the scope of 382:This article is within the scope of 402:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History 325:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1913:Napoleonic era task force articles 1728:I placed the tags on 16 April 2023 1483:per my own rationale given above. 1430:: For consistency & precision 1275:, and doesn't use "Dutch Empire" ( 1157:] The anchor (#Decline) has been 14: 1873:B-Class military history articles 1858:WikiProject South Africa articles 1838:Mid-importance Indonesia articles 1828:All WikiProject Netherlands pages 1803:B-Class vital articles in History 1630:Hi. Let's go through each point. 1012:Dutch military history task force 707:Template:WikiProject South Africa 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1498:The discussion above is closed. 1247:I think the name should be just 1178: 1131: 1084: 959: 948: 937: 926: 915: 845: 809: 763: 745: 671: 661: 640: 562: 552: 531: 511:Template:WikiProject Netherlands 471: 461: 443: 369: 359: 338: 305: 296: 225: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1908:B-Class Napoleonic era articles 1863:B-Class former country articles 1813:Top-importance history articles 1591:Not everything needs a citation 1044:Early Modern warfare task force 724:This article has been rated as 619:This article has been rated as 422:This article has been rated as 1843:WikiProject Indonesia articles 1793:B-Class level-5 vital articles 1384:closed by non-admin page mover 1251:, without capitals, just like 602:Template:WikiProject Indonesia 1: 1848:B-Class South Africa articles 1586:08:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 1562:Declined, fall, or rebranded? 698:and see a list of open tasks. 593:and see a list of open tasks. 396:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1823:B-Class Netherlands articles 1818:WikiProject History articles 1732:"placed on April fool's day" 1351:Requested move 22 April 2023 1331:, and even more so with the 855:Military history WikiProject 773:WikiProject Former countries 405:Template:WikiProject History 1934: 1833:B-Class Indonesia articles 1493:06:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC) 1476:23:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC) 1457:16:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC) 1440:23:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC) 1422:20:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC) 1400:14:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC) 1345:10:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC) 1289:Nederlandse koloniale rijk 1269:Nederlandse koloniale rijk 920:Referencing and citation: 730:project's importance scale 625:project's importance scale 428:project's importance scale 277:Featured article candidate 237:featured article candidate 1744:11:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC) 1621:07:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC) 1322:23:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC) 1233:(see upper right corner) 1061:Napoleonic era task force 1059: 1042: 1026: 1010: 981: 878:military history articles 840: 758: 723: 656: 618: 547: 456: 421: 354: 333: 251: 247: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1808:B-Class history articles 1764:16:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC) 1557:01:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC) 1532:11:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC) 1500:Please do not modify it. 1365:Please do not modify it. 1308:, even though a capital 687:WikiProject South Africa 1686:Treaty of London (1839) 1640:The lead section claim 1333:Belgian colonial empire 986:Associated task forces: 931:Coverage and accuracy: 792:former country articles 487:WikiProject Netherlands 1778:B-Class vital articles 1329:German colonial empire 1280: 1268: 1253:French colonial empire 1159:deleted by other users 1056: 1039: 1023: 1007: 964:Supporting materials: 892: 75:avoid personal attacks 1698:Franklin D. Roosevelt 1410:Dutch colonial empire 1273:Dutch colonial empire 1249:Dutch colonial empire 1195:Dutch colonial empire 1055: 1038: 1022: 1006: 891: 710:South Africa articles 578:WikiProject Indonesia 319:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 312:level-5 vital article 233:Dutch colonial empire 100:Neutral point of view 25:Dutch colonial empire 1261:Second French Empire 1116:relevant style guide 1112:varieties of English 514:Netherlands articles 105:No original research 1287:as a shorthand for 1257:First French Empire 1114:. According to the 1046:(c. 1500 – c. 1800) 953:Grammar and style: 906:for B-class status: 679:South Africa portal 385:WikiProject History 1702:Theodore Roosevelt 1293:Nederlandsche Rijk 1291:. "Dutch Empire" ( 1229:In old maps too: 1057: 1040: 1024: 1008: 893: 860:list of open tasks 605:Indonesia articles 479:Netherlands portal 321:content assessment 252:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 1711:Abraham Van Buren 1598:Nederlandse Leeuw 1485:Nederlandse Leeuw 1387: 1314:Nederlandse Leeuw 1209: 1208: 1173: 1172: 1148:in most browsers. 1126: 1125: 1079: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1066: 977: 976: 864:full instructions 804: 803: 800: 799: 740: 739: 736: 735: 635: 634: 631: 630: 587:Indonesia-related 526: 525: 522: 521: 438: 437: 434: 433: 290: 289: 286: 285: 220: 219: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1925: 1707:Roosevelt family 1694:Martin Van Buren 1659: 1643: 1601: 1524:ThoughtIdRetired 1397: 1392: 1381: 1367: 1312:is also common. 1285:Nederlandse rijk 1281:Nederlandse Rijk 1197:. The result of 1182: 1181: 1175: 1167:Reporting errors 1135: 1134: 1128: 1095:American English 1091:This article is 1088: 1081: 1063:(c. 1792 – 1815) 993: 983: 967: 963: 962: 956: 952: 951: 945: 941: 940: 934: 930: 929: 923: 919: 918: 897: 880: 879: 876: 873: 870: 869:Military history 849: 842: 841: 836: 817:Military history 813: 806: 794: 793: 790: 787: 784: 783:Former countries 778:join the project 767: 760: 759: 753:Former countries 749: 742: 712: 711: 708: 705: 702: 681: 676: 675: 674: 665: 658: 657: 652: 644: 637: 607: 606: 603: 600: 597: 572: 570:Indonesia portal 567: 566: 565: 556: 549: 548: 543: 535: 528: 516: 515: 512: 509: 506: 481: 476: 475: 474: 465: 458: 457: 447: 440: 410: 409: 408:history articles 406: 403: 400: 379: 374: 373: 372: 363: 356: 355: 350: 342: 335: 318: 309: 308: 301: 300: 292: 272: 249: 229: 222: 214: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1768: 1767: 1752: 1660:Any claim with 1595: 1593: 1564: 1539: 1509: 1504: 1503: 1395: 1390: 1363: 1353: 1255:(as opposed to 1245: 1214: 1179: 1169: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1132: 1120:broad consensus 991: 965: 960: 954: 949: 943: 938: 932: 927: 921: 916: 877: 874: 871: 868: 867: 819: 791: 788: 785: 782: 781: 709: 706: 703: 700: 699: 677: 672: 670: 650: 604: 601: 598: 595: 594: 568: 563: 561: 541: 513: 510: 507: 504: 503: 477: 472: 470: 407: 404: 401: 398: 397: 375: 370: 368: 348: 316: 306: 268: 216: 215: 210: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1931: 1929: 1921: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1770: 1769: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1715:New Netherland 1689: 1650: 1638: 1633:This is not a 1592: 1589: 1563: 1560: 1538: 1535: 1508: 1505: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1481:Strong support 1478: 1460: 1459: 1442: 1403: 1375: 1374: 1360:requested move 1354: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1297:Dutch Republic 1244: 1241: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1199:the discussion 1183: 1171: 1170: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1146:case-sensitive 1140: 1139: 1138: 1136: 1124: 1123: 1089: 1077: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1058: 1048: 1047: 1041: 1031: 1030: 1025: 1015: 1014: 1009: 999: 998: 996: 994: 988: 987: 979: 978: 975: 974: 972: 970: 969: 968: 957: 946: 935: 924: 910: 909: 907: 894: 884: 883: 881: 850: 838: 837: 834:Napoleonic era 814: 802: 801: 798: 797: 795: 768: 756: 755: 750: 738: 737: 734: 733: 726:Mid-importance 722: 716: 715: 713: 696:the discussion 683: 682: 666: 654: 653: 651:Mid‑importance 645: 633: 632: 629: 628: 621:Mid-importance 617: 611: 610: 608: 591:the discussion 574: 573: 557: 545: 544: 542:Mid‑importance 536: 524: 523: 520: 519: 517: 483: 482: 466: 454: 453: 448: 436: 435: 432: 431: 424:Top-importance 420: 414: 413: 411: 394:the discussion 381: 380: 377:History portal 364: 352: 351: 349:Top‑importance 343: 331: 330: 324: 302: 288: 287: 284: 283: 280: 273: 265: 264: 261: 258: 254: 253: 245: 244: 230: 218: 217: 208: 206: 205: 202: 201: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1930: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1839: 1836: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1773: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1690: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1657: 1651: 1647: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1629: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1605: 1599: 1590: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1576: 1574: 1572: 1568: 1561: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1549:Bart Terpstra 1547: 1542: 1536: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1506: 1501: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1462: 1461: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1393: 1385: 1380: 1373: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1356: 1355: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1242: 1240: 1239: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1221: 1218: 1212:Dutch Guiana. 1211: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1177: 1176: 1168: 1160: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1147: 1143: 1137: 1130: 1129: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1062: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1005: 1001: 1000: 997: 995: 990: 989: 984: 980: 973: 971: 966:criterion met 958: 955:criterion met 947: 944:criterion met 936: 933:criterion met 925: 922:criterion met 914: 913: 912: 911: 908: 905: 904: 898: 895: 890: 886: 885: 882: 865: 861: 857: 856: 851: 848: 844: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 818: 815: 812: 808: 796: 779: 775: 774: 769: 766: 762: 761: 757: 754: 751: 748: 744: 731: 727: 721: 718: 717: 714: 697: 693: 689: 688: 680: 669: 667: 664: 660: 659: 655: 649: 646: 643: 639: 626: 622: 616: 613: 612: 609: 592: 588: 584: 580: 579: 571: 560: 558: 555: 551: 550: 546: 540: 537: 534: 530: 518: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488: 480: 469: 467: 464: 460: 459: 455: 452: 449: 446: 442: 429: 425: 419: 416: 415: 412: 395: 391: 387: 386: 378: 367: 365: 362: 358: 357: 353: 347: 344: 341: 337: 332: 328: 322: 314: 313: 303: 299: 294: 293: 281: 279: 278: 274: 271: 270:June 19, 2008 267: 266: 262: 259: 256: 255: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 231: 228: 224: 223: 204: 203: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1753: 1718: 1681: 1673: 1669: 1661: 1655: 1646:Roman Empire 1635:good article 1594: 1569: 1565: 1543: 1540: 1521: 1518: 1510: 1499: 1480: 1464:Weak Support 1463: 1444: 1427: 1406:Dutch Empire 1404: 1378: 1376: 1364: 1357: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283:), and only 1272: 1248: 1246: 1228: 1222: 1219: 1215: 1202: 1191:Dutch Empire 1152: 1144:Anchors are 1141: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1092: 901: 853: 830:Early Modern 771: 725: 701:South Africa 692:South Africa 685: 648:South Africa 620: 576: 496:project page 485: 423: 383: 327:WikiProjects 310: 282:Not promoted 275: 235:is a former 232: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1370:move review 1093:written in 942:Structure: 505:Netherlands 492:Netherlands 451:Netherlands 148:free images 31:not a forum 1772:Categories 1649:addressed. 500:discussion 1468:Walrasiad 1449:Lubiesque 596:Indonesia 583:Indonesia 539:Indonesia 315:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1674:de facto 1670:de facto 1662:de facto 1656:de facto 1578:Mhatopzz 1391:Material 1108:traveled 903:criteria 826:European 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1682:de jure 1628:Rsk6400 1613:Rsk6400 1445:Support 1428:Support 1161:before. 1104:defense 728:on the 623:on the 426:on the 399:History 390:History 346:History 317:B-class 260:Process 241:archive 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1736:NLeeuw 1730:, not 1666:WP:POV 1432:Furius 1379:moved. 323:scale. 263:Result 126:Google 1606:says 1544:see: 1514:fluyt 1414:Nagsb 1396:Works 1337:Nagsb 1277:Dutch 1265:Dutch 1243:Title 1203:moved 1189:from 1187:moved 1100:color 822:Dutch 304:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1760:talk 1740:talk 1678:WP:V 1617:talk 1604:WP:V 1582:talk 1553:talk 1528:talk 1489:talk 1472:talk 1453:talk 1436:talk 1418:talk 1341:talk 1318:talk 1259:and 1201:was 1142:Tip: 585:and 257:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1719:not 1193:to 720:Mid 615:Mid 418:Top 176:TWL 1774:: 1762:) 1742:) 1680:. 1619:) 1584:) 1555:) 1530:) 1491:) 1474:) 1455:) 1438:) 1420:) 1408:→ 1388:– 1362:. 1343:) 1320:) 1279:: 1271:, 1267:: 1106:, 1102:, 992:/ 832:/ 828:/ 824:/ 820:: 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 1758:( 1738:( 1626:@ 1615:( 1600:: 1596:@ 1580:( 1551:( 1526:( 1487:( 1470:( 1451:( 1434:( 1416:( 1386:) 1382:( 1339:( 1316:( 1310:E 1306:e 1301:E 1205:. 1122:. 866:. 780:. 732:. 627:. 502:. 430:. 329:: 243:. 199:3 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Dutch colonial empire
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2
3
Former featured article candidate
featured article candidate
archive

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑