243:
222:
191:
340:
319:
514:
No, it's a sign that the website isn't maintained anymore. If this really still is the official website, then that is a pretty good indicator that
Embedded C++ isn't maintained anymore. No news for eight years has nothing to do with stability. Has anyone checked whether some companies still support
470:
well, it's been almost another 3 years, I think we can remove that criticism now. At least the 8/16 bit CPU market is no longer the "big market", even in embedded systems. With 32 bit CPUs now available in 48 pin packages, I don't think anybody is reasonably expecting to use C++ in any flavor if
153:
394:
493:
Managing to compile code for 32/16/other bits architectures is device specific, this is not EC++ specific. EC++ compilers for 8/16-bits architecture could emerge naturally depending on business demand.
147:
654:
650:
636:
543:" is based on an object-oriented programming model implemented in a restricted form of C++ that omits features unsuitable for use within a multithreaded kernel." --
301:
79:
540:
721:
291:
431:. If you follow the link, you see that it's (a) the usual "oh, C++ code is too big and slow for my sysem!" critisism, (b) it actually hopes EC++ will
736:
384:
85:
267:
44:
716:
746:
592:
360:
602:
731:
30:
429:
A criticism is that EC++ is intended for use with 32-bit architecture instead of focusing on the big market of 8/16-bit microcontrollers.
582:
250:
227:
99:
104:
20:
347:
324:
74:
726:
168:
202:
135:
65:
697:
129:
109:
653:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
359:
topics on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
352:
208:
741:
125:
688:
574:
593:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090101140055/http://www.tasking.com:80/resources/technologies/compilers/ecpp/
190:
263:
603:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081025094812/http://www.ghs.com:80/products/optimizingC++EC++Compilers.html
55:
672:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
660:
548:
266:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175:
573:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
70:
627:
583:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130521152331/http://www.testech-elect.com/iar/extended_embedded_c++.htm
471:
they're still using an 8-bit CPU. If that's removed, do we really need a criticism section at all?
161:
520:
657:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
673:
596:
435:
that and (c) the text is from 1997 and it's not clear that it's relevant thirteen years later.
606:
141:
51:
586:
544:
476:
458:
440:
680:
539:
appears to be the most significant project using EC++, and is currently maintained. c.f
566:
24:
639:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
679:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
646:
710:
552:
516:
507:
495:
449:
Oops, I misread the reference. While (a–c) above are true, the 8/16-bit complaint
472:
454:
436:
242:
221:
645:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
506:
Isn't it a sign of stability ? EC++ is stable since 2002, sounds good to me.
259:
702:
524:
480:
462:
444:
255:
339:
318:
536:
405:
356:
184:
15:
612:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
597:
http://www.tasking.com/resources/technologies/compilers/ecpp
607:
http://www.ghs.com/products/optimizingC++EC++Compilers.html
587:
http://www.testech-elect.com/iar/extended_embedded_c++.htm
577:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
570:
160:
351:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
254:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
649:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
174:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
635:This message was posted before February 2018.
502:Comment on EC++ website not updated since 2002
8:
541:I/O Kit Fundamentals: What Is the I/O Kit?
313:
216:
188:
565:I have just modified 3 external links on
404:This article falls within the scope of
315:
218:
624:to let others know (documentation at
276:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
345:This article is within the scope of
248:This article is within the scope of
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
722:Low-importance Computing articles
569:. Please take a moment to review
453:there. I won't make that change.
427:I'm removing the part which said
369:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject C/C++
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
338:
317:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
389:This article has been rated as
296:This article has been rated as
531:No mention of Apple's I/O Kit?
279:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
737:Low-importance C/C++ articles
717:Stub-Class Computing articles
703:11:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
363:and see a list of open tasks.
270:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
553:22:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
481:16:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
463:20:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
445:20:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
763:
747:WikiProject C/C++ articles
666:(last update: 5 June 2024)
562:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
489:Comment on 16/32 bit stuff
372:Template:WikiProject C/C++
302:project's importance scale
732:Stub-Class C/C++ articles
525:17:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
403:
388:
333:
295:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
530:
558:External links modified
727:All Computing articles
423:Removing bad quotation
264:information technology
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
251:WikiProject Computing
201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
647:regular verification
515:compilers for it? –
105:No original research
637:After February 2018
616:parameter below to
691:InternetArchiveBot
642:InternetArchiveBot
282:Computing articles
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
667:
420:
419:
416:
415:
412:
411:
348:WikiProject C/C++
312:
311:
308:
307:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
754:
701:
692:
665:
664:
643:
631:
395:importance scale
377:
376:
373:
370:
367:
342:
335:
334:
329:
321:
314:
284:
283:
280:
277:
274:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
762:
761:
757:
756:
755:
753:
752:
751:
707:
706:
695:
690:
658:
651:have permission
641:
625:
575:this simple FaQ
560:
533:
504:
491:
425:
374:
371:
368:
365:
364:
327:
281:
278:
275:
272:
271:
230:
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
760:
758:
750:
749:
744:
739:
734:
729:
724:
719:
709:
708:
685:
684:
677:
610:
609:
601:Added archive
599:
591:Added archive
589:
581:Added archive
559:
556:
532:
529:
528:
527:
503:
500:
490:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
424:
421:
418:
417:
414:
413:
410:
409:
402:
399:
398:
391:Low-importance
387:
381:
380:
378:
375:C/C++ articles
361:the discussion
343:
331:
330:
328:Low‑importance
322:
310:
309:
306:
305:
298:Low-importance
294:
288:
287:
285:
268:the discussion
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
759:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
730:
728:
725:
723:
720:
718:
715:
714:
712:
705:
704:
699:
694:
693:
682:
678:
675:
671:
670:
669:
662:
656:
652:
648:
644:
638:
633:
629:
623:
619:
615:
608:
604:
600:
598:
594:
590:
588:
584:
580:
579:
578:
576:
572:
568:
563:
557:
555:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
526:
522:
518:
513:
512:
511:
510:21 July 2010
509:
501:
499:
498:21 July 2010
497:
488:
482:
478:
474:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
422:
407:
401:
400:
396:
392:
386:
383:
382:
379:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:
344:
341:
337:
336:
332:
326:
323:
320:
316:
303:
299:
293:
290:
289:
286:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
742:C++ articles
689:
686:
661:source check
640:
634:
621:
617:
613:
611:
567:Embedded C++
564:
561:
534:
505:
492:
450:
448:
432:
428:
426:
390:
346:
297:
249:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:Embedded C++
19:This is the
628:Sourcecheck
545:April Arcus
148:free images
31:not a forum
711:Categories
698:Report bug
199:Stub-class
681:this tool
674:this tool
273:Computing
260:computing
256:computers
228:Computing
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
687:Cheers.—
535:Apple's
517:Adrianwn
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
614:checked
571:my edit
537:I/O Kit
393:on the
300:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
622:failed
473:Nerfer
262:, and
205:scale.
126:Google
366:C/C++
325:C/C++
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
618:true
549:talk
521:talk
477:talk
459:talk
441:talk
355:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
655:RfC
632:).
620:or
605:to
595:to
585:to
508:agr
496:agr
455:JöG
437:JöG
433:fix
406:C++
385:Low
357:C++
292:Low
176:TWL
713::
668:.
663:}}
659:{{
630:}}
626:{{
551:)
523:)
479:)
461:)
451:is
443:)
258:,
156:)
54:;
700:)
696:(
683:.
676:.
547:(
519:(
475:(
457:(
439:(
408:.
397:.
353:C
304:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
