575:
559:
346:
322:
310:
288:
272:
228:
192:
372:
260:
596:
42:
602:
I'm going to put this on hold for now until I hear back from someone about whether the article is still contested as it has been of late; also 'd like those citation needed tags to be addressed, though they arent crucial since they aren't marking controversial material,|I'm going to put this on hold
381:
I believe it is self-evident from the page history that edit-warring over budget and revenue figures and the long, long term issue over how the title is transliterated into
English are contentious and have been subject to continuous edit warring since the article was created. That I have just
505:
In this case, I'll accept that this promotion was premature, as this is definitely not satisfying the criterion listed. I'm unsure of the procedure for overturning a promotion, should I withdraw the promotion and fail the article myself or should I hand over the reigns to someone else?
377:
History has been chequered. I had a look through the edit history and it seems to have abated, but I'd appreciate someone involved in the article confirming for me that the edit warring mentioned on the talk page is over. If so then that'll be grand.
603:
for now until I hear back from someone about whether the article is still contested as it has been of late; also 'd like those citation needed tags to be addressed, though they arent crucial since they aren't marking controversial material,
473:
The edit history should be preferred to make any decision on stability rather than giving such weight to the opinion of one major contributor who is the same person requesting GAR. Thanks
293:
There's a few "citation needed" tags that need to be addressed (or the contested information removed, since the information tagged is trivial). Otherwise, citations are fine.
382:
reverted changes related to both these topics shows the article is not stable and I am surprised that this would not be evident to any reviewer checking the history.
80:
70:
222:
47:
400:. I took this at face value and assumed it would hold true, though if it hasn't then I'll stick by my initial apprehension over this criterion.
170:
126:
553:
396:
I hadn't seen anything recently when reviewing, and asked for clarification on the matter from the nominator, which I received
75:
52:
282:
122:
107:
424:
A stroll through the most recent history over just the last month shows continuing instability on box office figures:
202:
99:
246:
366:
516:
410:
397:
155:
545:
254:
210:
174:
496:
478:
387:
507:
401:
336:
206:
146:
569:
218:
214:
115:
17:
492:
474:
383:
92:
525:
500:
482:
419:
391:
164:
607:
Everything raised has been addressed, so I'm going to go ahead and
568:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
552:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
580:
Images are grand, no problem with their sourcing or use.
488:
466:
460:
454:
448:
444:
438:
432:
428:
134:
103:
371:
269:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
233:Prose seems fine, and MOS compliance is grand,
8:
30:
61:
33:
7:
611:this as a Good Article. Well done.
343:Fair representation without bias:
24:
594:
573:
557:
370:
344:
320:
308:
286:
270:
258:
226:
190:
595:
259:
491:made today is the same issue.
1:
574:
558:
345:
321:
309:
287:
271:
227:
191:
630:
549:to illustrate the topic?
526:13:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
501:12:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
483:21:32, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
420:20:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
392:04:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
165:18:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
327:Scope seems grand to me.
184:reasonably well written
302:broad in its coverage
255:References to sources
283:No original research
554:fair use rationales
351:Article is neutral.
307:A. Major aspects:
242:factually accurate
189:A. Prose quality:
570:suitable captions
522:
513:
416:
407:
161:
152:
89:
88:
621:
598:
597:
577:
576:
561:
560:
523:
518:
514:
509:
417:
412:
408:
403:
374:
373:
348:
347:
324:
323:
312:
311:
290:
289:
274:
273:
262:
261:
230:
229:
194:
193:
162:
157:
153:
148:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
629:
628:
624:
623:
622:
620:
619:
618:
517:
508:
411:
402:
205:compliance for
156:
147:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
627:
625:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
605:
593:Pass or Fail:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
566:
565:
564:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
485:
471:
470:
469:
463:
457:
451:
441:
435:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
317:
316:
315:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
279:
278:
277:
267:
266:
265:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
215:words to watch
199:
198:
197:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
626:
610:
606:
604:
600:
599:
592:
591:
589:
586:
579:
578:
571:
567:
563:
562:
555:
551:
550:
548:
547:
541:
527:
524:
521:
515:
512:
504:
503:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
462:
458:
456:
452:
450:
446:
442:
440:
436:
434:
430:
426:
425:
423:
422:
421:
418:
415:
409:
406:
399:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
376:
375:
368:
364:
363:
361:
357:
350:
349:
342:
341:
339:
338:
333:
326:
325:
318:
314:
313:
306:
305:
303:
299:
292:
291:
284:
280:
276:
275:
268:
264:
263:
256:
252:
251:
249:
248:
243:
239:
232:
231:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:
188:
187:
185:
181:
180:
179:
178:
176:
173:review – see
172:
167:
166:
163:
160:
154:
151:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
18:Talk:Enthiran
608:
601:
587:
543:
519:
510:
413:
404:
359:
335:
319:B. Focused:
301:
245:
241:
183:
177:for criteria
169:
168:
158:
149:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
247:verifiable
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
459:13 March
453:17 March
443:20 March
437:28 March
367:edit wars
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
544:contain
542:Does it
465:3 March
427:3 April
175:WP:WIAGA
76:Criteria
588:Overall
511:GRAPPLE
405:GRAPPLE
369:, etc:
337:neutral
219:fiction
150:GRAPPLE
127:history
108:history
94:Article
546:images
489:change
360:stable
358:Is it
334:Is it
300:Is it
240:Is it
221:, and
211:layout
182:Is it
487:This
449:diff2
445:diff1
433:diff2
429:diff1
223:lists
136:Watch
16:<
609:pass
497:talk
479:talk
467:diff
461:diff
455:diff
447:and
439:diff
431:and
398:here
388:talk
244:and
207:lead
123:edit
100:edit
365:No
281:C.
253:A.
203:MoS
201:B.
590::
572::
556::
499:)
493:Fæ
481:)
475:Fæ
390:)
384:Fæ
362:?
340:?
304:?
285::
257::
250:?
225::
217:,
213:,
209:,
186:?
171:GA
125:|
106:|
102:|
520:X
495:(
477:(
414:X
386:(
159:X
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.