1021:, Yahoo was not the original publisher of the article you linked. If you click on the link you can see that it was originally published by Fox News and Yahoo reprinted it crediting Fox News. Citing Yahoo is like citing Google if you googled something and wanted to cite the first result. If you cannot find a reliable source for a claim, then it should not be on Knowledge. This isn't a reason to add it and cite an unreliable or primary source like Twitter. Similarly Matt Walsh's claims should not be on Knowledge unless they have been quoted by a secondary source, this is important to establish notability. The parts of the section that I deleted were the parts that notability had not been established for using a secondary source.
489:
468:
1532:
conservatives, including Matt Walsh, criticized Erlick for detailing a plan on social media to send hormone therapy prescriptions to people in U.S. states working to criminalize such drugs. Erlick defended herself from criticism, saying that "all trans people should have access to gender-affirming care"." Nothing in this statement from Fox is inaccurate. Fox News is not acceptable? That's not what WP:RSP says: "There is no consensus on the reliability of Fox News's coverage of politics and science. Use Fox News with caution to verify contentious claims."
988:
1040:
Walsh said on the Matt Walsh Show in Matt Walsh's voice that he had done so and so. I used that, not to write that so and so had happened, but to write in the article that Matt Walsh said he had done so and so. Same for
Blackburn's tweet - I showed her tweet to support that which I said she'd written. If you have a preferred source with which to replace the given source, that's fine, but there is no reason to remove chunks of relevant information when the given source more than adequately backs up every word in the article.
1302:
Erlick wrote her Tweet about SCOTUS assassinations? The tweet is linked, as is
Senator Blackburn's response, thus making the claim irrefutable. (As it is, IIRC, Erlick's deletion of her tweet, and dismissal as a joke of such, was quoted in the Yahoo article, and therefore, presumably, in the Fox article.) If you would like to call in a third party to arbitrate the situation, please feel free. I will happily respect their ruling on the matter. But please refrain from reverting until that point. Thank you.
1600:. It doesn't really matter if individual editors think it's fine to use Fox News as a source for a BLP. Consensus has determined they are not an appropriate source when dealing in politics for a BLP, as seen on RSP. You just said they are biased, which is of course true. We can't pick and choose which sentences we want to use out of a biased source that RSP says we cannot use. If you think Fox News should be allowed to be used, that's a topic for RSP, not this article. --
440:
721:"a child" Uh, perhaps this is also irrelevant, or perhaps this is not referring to the D. Diamond posts, but, unless my math is way off, E. Erlick is a year younger than D. Diamond, according to the "22" age given on the 2016 archived tumblr biography page. Adult-on-child sexual assault shouldn't be implied through omission. If a younger child has actually sexually assaulted an older one, that's already bad.
376:
352:
282:
264:
386:
1174:, if Joe Biden or Donald Trump tweets something that doesn't mean it should go on Knowledge either. There are rare circumstances where primary sources including Twitter can be used, often to add context to other claims, but it is the only source you included for the entire controversy regarding the US supreme court statement. This is not one of those cases, especially in this article since it is a
1764:
945:
1505:, "Biographies of living persons must be written conservatively... it is not Knowledge's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives." The headlines being added from low-quality conservative outlets and social media sources not only don't meet sourcing requirements, they are also sensationalist and POV-pushing.
233:
1809:
292:
821:
The death threats and Erlick disabling her
Twitter for a brief time... I don't think is relevant on it's own unless it is fleshed out more. Both that she was receiving death threats for her Ariana Grande piece and also because she has been accused of rape from multiple people, and these conversations
1839:
Doing some background, and verifying sources before continuing down my project further, and I noticed that her education citations can only be partly verified. I see that she did graduate at least at Pitzer
College in Claremont, but the course she completed is only a three year degree, and the cites
1394:
As to the first point, happy to hear. Always best when we can work it out to everyone's satsfaction. As to the second point...had Erlick not supplied quotes directly addressing the situation, then I think we can all agree that it would not belong. But once he acknowledged that the claims existed and
1070:
sources. There are an enormous number of tweets published about many people every day. Some are relevant for
Knowledge and others are not. To determine which are relevant, we rely on reliable secondary sources. The only such source provided so far is the Fox News article, which only backs up some of
1859:
Should it be indicated that Erlick called for assassination of
Supreme Court justices in the wake of Roe v. Wade being overturned? It seems noteworthy, especially considering that he's accused others of "stochastic terrorism" just for criticizing university administrators and encouraging people to
1531:
I disagree that Fox News is not an adequate source for this controversy. They're biased, sure, but none of the information in the article seems to be inaccurate. And even if some info is inaccurate, we could simply use the information that is. I would suggest saying in the article: "In August 2022,
1130:
You wrote, and I quote, "There are an enormous number of tweets published about many people every day." Exactly! Published "ABOUT many people", which is very different than BY the person. The notability claim clearly doesn't work when a US Senator tweets in response to a tweet by the subject of the
1039:
Using YT and
Twitter to use a direct quote or direct claim from the person is perfectly acceptable on YT. If you'd rather not, that's your choice, but one should not remove someone else's work on that basis. I certainly did not use either YT or Twitter as a "source" of independent information. Matt
1301:
There are plenty of WP:BLP articles which use YT and/or
Twitter as a source under the circumstances described. The WP:BLP restriction exists because of the sensitivity of the situation, so it is absolutely necessary to make sure the information is correct. In this instance, would anyone deny that
698:
Slander is when someone makes a false claim that causes damage to the slandered individual's reputation. An admission against interest is a long-standing exception to the rules of evidence in Anglo
American law's prohibition on hearsay, because the legal presumption is that most people would not
680:
against her. The person who wrote the post on the tumblr blog was also openly mentally ill. Mentally ill people writing an unconfirmed tumblr blog post are not valid citations especially by wiki standards. I am posting this since there have been two people who have tried to edit in that she is a
817:
I believe it is relevant to reference the unspecified "serious" and "concerning" allegations against Erlick. The website INTO released a press release cutting ties with Erlick citing these (unspecified) allegations. While no "reputable" source has published that these are rape allegations from
1147:
As to your closing paragraph: "Please respond to my objections here rather than engaging in edit warring", I say the same. Don't revert first and ask questions later. This is particularly true once BrownHaired Girl, a former
Knowledge Admin with 2.8 million edits to her credit, already saw my
703:
responsibility, but even admits that she is guilty of the claims, and says she'll seek therapy to do better going forward. Clearly the subject is admitting to the repeated rape of a child. The failure of the state to take action is entirely irrelevant to the proof she has provided herself.
1648:
Well, for now, we'll leave it out, if only because I want to move on from this already, and totally lack the patience to continue down this path. That said, I did put back in some basic information which had been stripped out, information without which this article would be sorely lacking.
702:
Here there are actual screenshots where she is repeatedly challenged by a victim that was a minor at the time, who accuses her of repeatedly being preyed upon, raped, while a minor attending a conference that the subject spoke at. From the subject's multiple responses, she not only accepts
575:, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's
1497:. Fox News, Breitbart, content aggregators, Twitter, etc are not acceptable sources, especially for BLPs. Breitbart is on the WP blacklist, and Twitter is a social network (wee WP:RSPTWITTER). If you are not sure about a source, ask on the RSP talk page or on the article's talk page.
917:
as if the Knowledge statements have been factual, but that may be caused by a subjective interpretation that the Knowledge article imposed on readers before they were able to verify the sources. Maybe someone knows of a better source than etcanada.com, intomore.com and thewrap.com.
1550:"Everything is free, no questions asked" is integral to the controversy and explains the allegation of "drug pushing". Leaving that out is a mistake. I believe that everything Erlick has said in her defense regarding any issue has been very clearly represented in the article.
1143:
Indeed you will find as you spend more time on Knowledge that YouTube videos and Tweets are in fact used in situations such as I used it here. That is an accepted part of Knowledge, and in no way violates their rules. (Please don't start deleting every such instance,
1688:
There is nothing "illegal" about the drugs that she is purporting to send to minors, in the states they reside. (Her sending the drugs to minors IS illegal however) These are LEGAL drugs; they must be prescribed by a doctor though, like most other prescription
1100:. You say it is "clearly" not the case that there is an overriding reason to remove the claims despite my objection being that you did not include reliable sources for all your claims - one of the most basic rules that must be followed on Knowledge.
793:
I am not bonded to this subject, I was simply attracted by the enormous edit warring that's been going on. Please, remember that edit warring (reverting another editor's edits over and over) is not constructive and is a blockable offense. Please see
1628:
That's not what RSP says about Fox: "There is no consensus on the reliability of Fox News's coverage of politics and science. Use Fox News with caution to verify contentious claims." I dpoesn't say to never use, it just says to exercise caution.
699:
willingly admit to a crime unless they were confessing to the truth of it. The mental status of the victim (which itself is a vicious and unproven slander leveled by yourself) is entirely irrelevant to her actual, uncontested admission of guilt.
908:
describes the allegations as "concerning", but does not mention the name of the person. To keep or restore the Knowledge sentence, we need a source that mentions both the name and the allegations in one article, in a way that does not require
1131:
article. The notability is clearly established by definition. Similarly, Matt Walsh's notability, particularly in relation to this issue, is hardly in question. A response he gave regarding an issue in that article is notable by definition.
591:; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the
586:
pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included
1139:
Let us say that President Biden, or former President Trump, were to Tweet (or "Truth Social", however it is called there). Even if no one had reported on it, would you consider it "not notable"? It does not work that
153:
1452:. It was using Free Beacon, Christian Broadcasting Network, Twitter, Fox News, and The Matt Walsh Show as source. Really, that's not the kind of sources you should be using for a trans activist. ---Lilach5 (
904:. While the terms "serious" and "concerning" do indeed appear in the sources, the connection to the article subject is not as clear as I'd expect it to be when reading this in Knowledge. For example, the
798:. Instead, start a conversation here and find consensus. There's a request to protect this page in process, I hope a cooling off period stimulates discussion here instead of fighting on the article.
1707:
618:
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because all notability requirements are met (significant coverage; independent, reliable, and multiple sources; etc) --
1912:
722:
1148:
additions to the article and simply upgraded the referencing work, but left every word of my edit as it was. Certainly you are not claiming better knowledge of Knowledge's rules than she has?
972:
1181:
It is an accepted part of Knowledge that editors remove content placed there by other editors. This is not out of bounds, and in my opinion the basis for removing what I removed is solid.
1410:
I've made some edits now. I still think there are some issues with the sources' reliability and bias, but I think this is close to NPOV and verifiable based on what we have to work with.
870:. The article is not mainly about the Twitter account deletion, and its other content seems to be relevant (or even more relevant) to the article topic. Furthermore, I'd like to point to
871:
449:
362:
1253:
I see far too much reliance on a tweet. I agree with TWM03 that this is wholly inadequate sourcing, and that the section should be removed until better sources are found: per
1917:
603:
212:
1059:
is a news aggregator. Just because it links an article, does not mean it endorses it. Since Yahoo does not edit the articles it republishes, this gives no more credibility.
1178:
article. If you are claiming that another editor agrees with your edit, maybe you should invite them to contribute to the discussion rather than speaking on their behalf?
1247:
needed to be filled. It is one of many thousands such edits which I make every month, without even looking at the article: all I see is a tiny fragment of wikicode.
147:
1672:
earlier. I'm worn out from this page. I still think that the SCOTUS comment and the illegal drug distribution deserve a mention, but if I'm outvoted, then so be it.
1614:
It appears the Fox News article is, well, an article. I thought it was from a Fox News talk show, which is treated differently at RSP. Ignore the above comment! --
866:, I believe that reducing the content of the citation to the Twitter account "deletion" (isn't it online again? Any recent sources about this?) would be a case of
1932:
539:
529:
1861:
1840:
does not confirm that she graduated with honors. Both of these two statements should have cites to confirm that she did graduate early as well as with Honors.
1892:
217:
1942:
200:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
1074:
Finally, please do take it personally that what you wrote is being removed, I am just trying to ensure that Knowledge's core policies are being followed.
818:
multiple people, and thus it might not be fair to publish these allegations as rape allegations on Knowledge, it is fair to publish them as unspecified.
1922:
1036:
Yahoo accepted Fox's reporting, giving it added credibility. Not that there is anything wrong with your using Fox, but there was no need to remove Yahoo.
79:
1791:
Change "She could not her school's restroom" to "She could not use her school's restroom" to add the word "use" to complete the sentence correctly.
505:
1927:
1902:
1502:
901:
593:
414:
310:
192:
1863:
1509:
3. Anyone can edit WP. If you are new to editing and aren't sure what is appropriate to add, or how to get information to "stick", visit the
1282:
676:
prosecuted, nor was she taken to court publicly. Thus any attempt to edit in a false allegation is merely slander. Nothing has been actually
85:
314:
1373:
That said, I think we need better sources if we are going to keep the statement about sexual assault allegations, since this is a serious
1937:
1897:
1841:
1693:
704:
563:
496:
473:
1211:. I wouldn't take that as an endorsement of your prior edits to this article. Tagging her so she can speak for herself if she chooses.
1711:
410:
400:
357:
318:
44:
1359:
These extra sources are useful, I don't think the section needs to be deleted anymore but I may make some edits to it at some point.
726:
1870:
976:
849:
1706:
You're beating a strawman. The illegal act is distributing prescription drugs to people who don't have prescriptions. It's a crime.
309:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1257:, it is the responsibility of the editor who adds material to justify its inclusion and to provide suitable high-quality sources.
655:
305:
269:
99:
30:
1907:
1377:
issue and the Fox article is effectively engaging in hearsay by quoting Matt Walsh stating allegations made by someone else.
1071:
what you wrote. If you want to add the rest back in, you would need to find other reliable sources to back the statements up.
910:
573:
Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space
104:
20:
1865:
1395:
then directly addressed them, and we prominently include Erlick's denial and explanation, I believe we are on safe ground.
1151:
I am respectfully asking you to not overstep your bounds and remove the work of other editors without solid basis to do so.
74:
1867:
168:
1745:
244:
135:
65:
1513:
or ask a more seasoned editor. In the meantime, highly contested articles are not the best place for trial-and-error.
1730:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
1457:
905:
1250:
I did not examine the merits of any preceding edits, let alone endorse them. However, now that I look these edits,
999:
488:
467:
1278:
1208:
1860:
email them. A sitting US Senator also commented on it and called for the Department of Justice to get involved
1796:
1845:
1697:
708:
1770:
1741:
951:
201:
129:
109:
1792:
1664:
And now, a few minutes later, I just belatedly read this section through and found that I'd misunderstood
1093:
893:
863:
1734:
1493:
1. Information in BLPs needs to be verifiable and sourced to reliable sources. Editors can find those on
1453:
1874:
1679:
1654:
1557:
1400:
1344:
1324:
1307:
1161:
1047:
743:
501:
250:
125:
1675:
1650:
1553:
1425:
1396:
1356:
1340:
1320:
1303:
1233:
1196:
1171:
1157:
1089:
1043:
1018:
1667:
1269:
1204:
738:
there are existing screenshots of Erlick acknowledging the accusations agreeing that they are true.
688:
653:
211:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
232:
1476:
1437:
1244:
1216:
827:
739:
161:
55:
619:
504:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175:
1634:
1571:
1537:
1510:
923:
879:
215:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
70:
1581:
1411:
1378:
1360:
1237:
1182:
1101:
1075:
1022:
850:"INTO Editor 'Sorry' for Anti-Ariana Grande Story, Cuts Ties to Writer Over Past 'Allegations'"
1063:
623:
51:
1726:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
1619:
1605:
1522:
1254:
995:
803:
297:
1816:
1585:
1415:
1382:
1364:
1186:
1105:
1079:
1026:
994:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
897:
867:
684:
646:
208:
409:-related issues on Knowledge. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
141:
1472:
1433:
1226:
1212:
823:
1580:
There is no secondary source for this quote, so until one is found it can't be added.
1886:
1630:
1597:
1567:
1533:
1494:
1374:
1175:
1097:
919:
875:
795:
642:
580:
1265:
1067:
391:
439:
1740:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
1615:
1601:
1518:
1261:
1056:
799:
568:
375:
351:
281:
263:
381:
287:
24:
1849:
1487:
Without reading every word of this section, a few things needs to be stated:
1243:
was a semi-automated driveby technical edit, which merely identified that a
1003:
1428:: Eli Erlick is a trans woman and goes by she/her pronouns. I hope your
1260:
Matza Pizza, this would be a really good time to re-read and study
317:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1878:
1828:
1800:
1749:
1715:
1701:
1683:
1658:
1638:
1623:
1609:
1589:
1575:
1561:
1541:
1526:
1480:
1460:
1441:
1419:
1404:
1386:
1368:
1348:
1328:
1311:
1287:
1220:
1190:
1165:
1109:
1083:
1051:
1030:
1006:
980:
927:
883:
831:
807:
747:
730:
712:
692:
657:
627:
406:
405:, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
1092:, Please respond to my objections here rather than engaging in
1758:
939:
555:
226:
207:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
184:
15:
438:
765:
567:
guideline because it contains material about one or more
579:
expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by
1468:
1449:
1429:
1251:
1241:
1200:
913:
to extract this information. To me as a reader, it did
872:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cecelia199/Archive
160:
1062:
You might like to read Knowledge's policies on using
1337:
And now I added one more. I hope we're all good now.
500:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1913:C-Class WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles
1692:To claim these drugs are "illegal" is misleading.
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1835:Early Life Edit Request (Sources don't add up)
1755:Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2023
589:if the person was notable while using the name
936:Semi-protected edit request on 11 August 2022
641:met, but that requires a full discussion via
174:
8:
681:rapist, despite not having any solid proof.
1317:Okay, I added a source on the SCOTUS thing.
1918:WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles
672:valid citations for Knowledge and she was
462:
346:
258:
892:Okay. On second thought, I have entirely
841:
757:
464:
348:
260:
230:
1708:2604:3D09:C77:4E00:29C3:92A0:893A:208E
1933:Mid-importance Women writers articles
723:2A01:E0A:8A7:D1A0:7155:539C:4C97:AC97
7:
973:2601:192:7F:FFE3:7D31:4FED:2279:E7F9
874:. This is not how discussion works.
494:This article is within the scope of
303:This article is within the scope of
1893:Biography articles of living people
514:Knowledge:WikiProject Women writers
249:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1943:WikiProject Women writers articles
561:This article should adhere to the
517:Template:WikiProject Women writers
423:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
14:
1923:WikiProject LGBT studies articles
1566:What phrasing woulg you suggest?
426:Template:WikiProject LGBT studies
1807:
1762:
1469:alerted WikiProject LGBT Studies
986:
943:
637:the notability requirements are
487:
466:
384:
374:
350:
290:
280:
262:
231:
190:This article must adhere to the
45:Click here to start a new topic.
822:were happening simultaneously.
534:This article has been rated as
397:This article is of interest to
327:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
1928:C-Class Women writers articles
1903:WikiProject Biography articles
900:may be an issue and it is the
896:the disputed section, because
330:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1850:03:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
1716:04:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
1240:is entirely correct. My edit
508:and see a list of open tasks.
447:This article is supported by
193:biographies of living persons
42:Put new text under old text.
1829:01:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
1801:01:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
1750:16:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
928:17:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
902:biography of a living person
884:17:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
832:00:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
808:21:47, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
748:19:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
693:14:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
658:14:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
628:01:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
315:contribute to the discussion
1785:to reactivate your request.
1773:has been answered. Set the
1702:11:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
1684:09:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
1659:09:16, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
1639:20:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
1624:17:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
1610:17:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
1590:17:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
1576:16:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
1562:14:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
1542:06:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
1527:21:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1481:20:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1461:20:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1442:19:07, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1420:17:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1405:16:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1387:16:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1369:16:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1349:16:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1329:15:55, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1312:15:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1288:19:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1221:19:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1191:15:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1166:15:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1110:14:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1084:14:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1052:14:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1031:13:55, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
1007:09:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
981:04:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
966:to reactivate your request.
954:has been answered. Set the
205:must be removed immediately
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1959:
1938:WikiProject Women articles
1898:C-Class biography articles
1450:removed the entire section
540:project's importance scale
450:the LGBT Person task force
731:10:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
713:07:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
533:
497:WikiProject Women writers
482:
446:
369:
275:
257:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1430:misgendering her as "he"
401:WikiProject LGBT studies
1879:21:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
1855:Assassination challenge
1834:
1096:. Please also note the
813:Unspecified allegations
1225:Thanks for the ping, @
996:"change X to Y" format
864:Special:Diff/880969231
520:Women writers articles
443:
239:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1908:C-Class LGBT articles
1122:Please pay attention.
1013:Controversies section
766:"Scientific Inqueery"
643:Articles for deletion
597:, or, in the case of
442:
413:or contribute to the
306:WikiProject Biography
100:Neutral point of view
1471:to this discussion.
906:intomore.com article
105:No original research
1209:semi-automated tool
1207:was performed by a
645:. Speedy declined.
1742:Community Tech bot
1201:edit you mentioned
614:Contested deletion
444:
333:biography articles
245:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1789:
1788:
1286:
970:
969:
911:original research
668:Tumblr blogs are
611:
610:
554:
553:
550:
549:
546:
545:
461:
460:
457:
456:
345:
344:
341:
340:
225:
224:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1950:
1826:
1821:
1815:
1811:
1810:
1780:
1776:
1766:
1765:
1759:
1671:
1432:was accidental?
1277:
1275:
1273:
1002:if appropriate.
990:
989:
961:
957:
947:
946:
940:
854:
853:
846:
781:
780:
778:
777:
762:
651:
633:I'm not sure if
594:LGBT WikiProject
556:
522:
521:
518:
515:
512:
491:
484:
483:
478:
470:
463:
431:
430:
427:
424:
421:
394:
389:
388:
387:
378:
371:
370:
365:
354:
347:
335:
334:
331:
328:
325:
311:join the project
300:
298:Biography portal
295:
294:
293:
284:
277:
276:
266:
259:
242:
236:
235:
227:
213:this noticeboard
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1958:
1957:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1883:
1882:
1857:
1837:
1822:
1817:
1808:
1806:
1793:Alicepuderbaugh
1778:
1774:
1763:
1757:
1728:
1689:pharmacuticals.
1668:BrownHairedGirl
1665:
1271:
1270:
1205:BrownHairedGirl
1015:
1000:reliable source
987:
959:
955:
944:
938:
859:
858:
857:
848:
847:
843:
815:
791:
786:
785:
784:
775:
773:
764:
763:
759:
695:
666:
647:
616:
604:BLP noticeboard
601:people, to the
564:gender identity
519:
516:
513:
510:
509:
476:
428:
425:
422:
419:
418:
390:
385:
383:
360:
332:
329:
326:
323:
322:
296:
291:
289:
243:on Knowledge's
240:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1956:
1954:
1946:
1945:
1940:
1935:
1930:
1925:
1920:
1915:
1910:
1905:
1900:
1895:
1885:
1884:
1856:
1853:
1836:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1787:
1786:
1767:
1756:
1753:
1738:
1737:
1735:Glesn 2012.jpg
1727:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1690:
1673:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1626:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1578:
1551:
1545:
1544:
1529:
1515:
1514:
1507:
1506:
1499:
1498:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1484:
1483:
1464:
1463:
1445:
1444:
1422:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1338:
1332:
1331:
1318:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1258:
1248:
1230:
1193:
1179:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1086:
1072:
1060:
1041:
1037:
1014:
1011:
1010:
1009:
998:and provide a
968:
967:
948:
937:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
887:
886:
856:
855:
840:
839:
835:
814:
811:
790:
787:
783:
782:
756:
755:
751:
736:
735:
734:
733:
716:
715:
700:
683:
665:
662:
661:
660:
639:unquestionably
615:
612:
609:
608:
559:
552:
551:
548:
547:
544:
543:
536:Mid-importance
532:
526:
525:
523:
506:the discussion
492:
480:
479:
477:Mid‑importance
471:
459:
458:
455:
454:
445:
435:
434:
432:
396:
395:
379:
367:
366:
355:
343:
342:
339:
338:
336:
302:
301:
285:
273:
272:
267:
255:
254:
248:
237:
223:
222:
218:this help page
202:poorly sourced
188:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1955:
1944:
1941:
1939:
1936:
1934:
1931:
1929:
1926:
1924:
1921:
1919:
1916:
1914:
1911:
1909:
1906:
1904:
1901:
1899:
1896:
1894:
1891:
1890:
1888:
1881:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1866:
1864:
1862:
1854:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1842:99.145.188.43
1830:
1827:
1825:
1820:
1814:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1784:
1781:parameter to
1772:
1768:
1761:
1760:
1754:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1736:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1725:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1694:98.110.28.126
1691:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1669:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1627:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1530:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1486:
1485:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1465:
1462:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1289:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1256:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:3 revert rule
1095:
1091:
1087:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
985:
984:
983:
982:
978:
974:
965:
962:parameter to
953:
949:
942:
941:
935:
929:
925:
921:
916:
912:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
890:
889:
888:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
860:
851:
845:
842:
838:
834:
833:
829:
825:
819:
812:
810:
809:
805:
801:
797:
788:
771:
767:
761:
758:
754:
750:
749:
745:
741:
732:
728:
724:
720:
719:
718:
717:
714:
710:
706:
705:47.200.199.43
701:
697:
696:
694:
690:
686:
682:
679:
675:
671:
663:
659:
656:
654:
652:
650:
644:
640:
636:
632:
631:
630:
629:
625:
621:
613:
606:
605:
600:
596:
595:
590:
585:
584:
578:
574:
570:
566:
565:
560:
558:
557:
541:
537:
531:
528:
527:
524:
511:Women writers
507:
503:
502:women writers
499:
498:
493:
490:
486:
485:
481:
475:
474:Women writers
472:
469:
465:
452:
451:
441:
437:
436:
433:
429:LGBT articles
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
393:
382:
380:
377:
373:
372:
368:
364:
359:
356:
353:
349:
337:
320:
319:documentation
316:
312:
308:
307:
299:
288:
286:
283:
279:
278:
274:
271:
268:
265:
261:
256:
252:
246:
238:
234:
229:
228:
220:
219:
214:
210:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:
189:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1858:
1838:
1823:
1818:
1812:
1790:
1782:
1771:edit request
1739:
1729:
1647:
1393:
1300:
1129:
1094:edit warring
1066:sources and
1016:
991:
971:
963:
952:edit request
914:
868:undue weight
844:
836:
820:
816:
792:
789:Edit warring
774:. Retrieved
772:. 2016-12-21
769:
760:
752:
737:
677:
673:
669:
667:
648:
638:
634:
617:
602:
598:
592:
588:
582:
576:
572:
562:
535:
495:
448:
420:LGBT studies
411:project page
399:
398:
392:LGBTQ portal
358:LGBT studies
304:
251:WikiProjects
216:
204:
197:
191:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1871:174.5.52.32
1676:Matza Pizza
1651:Matza Pizza
1554:Matza Pizza
1426:Matza Pizza
1397:Matza Pizza
1357:Matza Pizza
1341:Matza Pizza
1321:Matza Pizza
1304:Matza Pizza
1234:Matza Pizza
1197:Matza Pizza
1172:Matza Pizza
1158:Matza Pizza
1090:Matza Pizza
1057:Yahoo! News
1044:Matza Pizza
1019:Matza Pizza
664:Rape claims
569:trans women
148:free images
31:not a forum
1887:Categories
1775:|answered=
1517:Cheers. --
1274:HairedGirl
1154:Thank you.
956:|answered=
920:~ ToBeFree
876:~ ToBeFree
862:Regarding
837:References
776:2018-01-11
770:archive.is
753:References
685:ShimonChai
649:Ritchie333
415:discussion
25:Eli Erlick
1473:Funcrunch
1434:Funcrunch
1255:WP:BURDEN
1227:Funcrunch
1213:Funcrunch
992:Not done:
824:Endwealth
581:singular
324:Biography
270:Biography
209:libellous
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1631:X-Editor
1598:X-Editor
1568:X-Editor
1534:X-Editor
1511:Teahouse
1501:2. From
1283:contribs
1245:bare URL
1144:really.)
1068:reliable
898:WP:SYNTH
740:Wikidyke
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1819:Liliana
1458:discuss
1064:primary
894:removed
620:Anon523
538:on the
241:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1616:Kbabej
1602:Kbabej
1519:Kbabej
1503:WP:BLP
1495:WP:RSP
1375:WP:BLP
1279:(talk)
1199:: The
1176:WP:BLP
800:Ifnord
796:WP:3RR
678:PROVEN
599:living
577:latest
363:Person
247:scale.
126:Google
1779:|ans=
1769:This
1582:TWM03
1467:I've
1454:לילך5
1412:TWM03
1379:TWM03
1361:TWM03
1272:Brown
1266:WP:RS
1238:TWM03
1183:TWM03
1102:TWM03
1076:TWM03
1023:TWM03
960:|ans=
950:This
407:LGBTQ
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1875:talk
1846:talk
1813:Done
1797:talk
1746:talk
1712:talk
1698:talk
1680:talk
1655:talk
1635:talk
1620:talk
1606:talk
1596:Hi @
1586:talk
1572:talk
1558:talk
1538:talk
1523:talk
1477:talk
1438:talk
1416:talk
1401:talk
1383:talk
1365:talk
1345:talk
1325:talk
1308:talk
1264:and
1262:WP:V
1217:talk
1203:by @
1187:talk
1162:talk
1140:way.
1106:talk
1080:talk
1048:talk
1027:talk
1004:Zudo
977:talk
924:talk
915:seem
880:talk
828:talk
804:talk
744:talk
727:talk
709:talk
689:talk
624:talk
583:they
313:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1824:UwU
1777:or
1281:• (
1236:: @
958:or
674:NOT
670:NOT
635:all
530:Mid
198:BLP
176:TWL
1889::
1877:)
1869:.
1848:)
1799:)
1783:no
1748:)
1714:)
1700:)
1682:)
1657:)
1637:)
1622:)
1608:)
1588:)
1574:)
1560:)
1540:)
1525:)
1479:)
1456:)
1448:I
1440:)
1418:)
1403:)
1385:)
1367:)
1347:)
1327:)
1310:)
1268:.
1219:)
1189:)
1164:)
1108:)
1082:)
1050:)
1029:)
979:)
964:no
926:)
882:)
830:)
806:)
768:.
746:)
729:)
711:)
691:)
626:)
571:.
361::
156:)
54:;
1873:(
1844:(
1795:(
1744:(
1710:(
1696:(
1678:(
1670::
1666:@
1653:(
1633:(
1618:(
1604:(
1584:(
1570:(
1556:(
1536:(
1521:(
1475:(
1436:(
1424:@
1414:(
1399:(
1381:(
1363:(
1355:@
1343:(
1323:(
1306:(
1285:)
1232:@
1229:.
1215:(
1195:@
1185:(
1170:@
1160:(
1104:(
1088:@
1078:(
1046:(
1025:(
1017:@
975:(
922:(
878:(
852:.
826:(
802:(
779:.
742:(
725:(
707:(
687:(
622:(
607:.
542:.
453:.
417:.
321:.
253::
221:.
196:(
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
