Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Elimination Chamber/GA1

Source 📝

119:"In 2002, due to an excess of on-screen talent after buying World Championship Wrestling (WCW), WWE enforced its Brand Extension in which on-screen employees were assigned to work on one of two television programs that were promoted as "brands" (like conferences in the National Football League) of WWE, Raw and SmackDown!" Sorry but I don't understand what you're trying to get at here. I think this needs rewording. Neither does there seem to be a main sentence, other then "WWE enforced its Brand Extension". Enforced it to do what? 460: 437: 423: 330: 277: 245: 211: 392: 368: 291: 305: 340: 139:"The match was exclusive to the Raw brand for the first four matches at Raw and joint-branded pay-per-view events, but upon the creation of the ECW brand in 2006, the match was promoted for the newly created brand at their December to Dismember pay-per-view event. " This sentence has the words/terms, Raw, brand and pay-per-view twice each. Needs rewording. 465:
The English needs improving, better referencing, more on the actual matches themselves, and perhaps some images. At the moment, this article feels like a skeleton without any meat on it. It's well-structured and has the basis of a good article, but I feel needs more work to get up to good status. I
144:"In July 2010, WWE released Satan's Prison, an Elimination Chamber anthology featuring every Elimination Chamber match to date as of the Elimination Chamber ppv." Uses "Elimination Chamber" three times in one sentence. Also I presume ppv is pay-per-view? 174:"Raw has been featured in the most matches, with seven; ... No Way Out has featured the most matches than any other pay-per-view, with four." Again, this seems contradictory. Has Raw or No Way Out featured the most? 250:
The article is badly written in places, seems contradictory and the English is very clunky. The lead is too short and two sections are little more than a sentence long.
164:"ECW has been featured once and in one joint-branded match with SmackDown for a total of two" ECW has featured once or twice? This sentence contradicts itself. 66: 62: 124:"Former WCW President and then Raw General Manager": President and general manager aren't proper nouns and shouldn't, in my opinion, be capitalised. 47: 189: 183: 39: 415: 297: 109:
it certainly needs to be longer, but even with a bit of common sense, you don't get a feel for the article such is its paucity.
217: 263: 237: 55: 17: 169:"SmackDown has been featured twice and in one joint-branded match with ECW for a total of three." As above. 129:"formally announced the creation of the chamber": I presume "the chamber" refers to "Elimination Chamber"? 32: 405: 225: 345:
This article is about wrestling yet doesn't name a single wrestler until a section at the end.
354: 221: 106: 471: 90: 429: 233: 229: 154:"2 miles (3.2 km) of chain are also used." Try not start a sentence with a numerical value. 283: 159:"The fifth match," ? What happened to the other four? This has no frame of reference. 475: 94: 466:
also notice this was a previous FA list candidate. Is this an article or a list?
467: 86: 74: 43: 105:
The lead really fails to summarize the article. Per
8: 414:(images are tagged and non-free images have 7: 409:, where possible and appropriate. 339: 24: 458: 435: 421: 390: 366: 363:Fair representation without bias 338: 328: 303: 289: 275: 243: 209: 304: 1: 476:23:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 95:23:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 459: 436: 422: 391: 367: 329: 290: 276: 244: 210: 496: 134:"Raw": Italicised or not? 18:Talk:Elimination Chamber 199:reasonably well written 428:(appropriate use with 403:It is illustrated by 355:neutral point of view 318:broad in its coverage 416:fair use rationales 387:No edit wars, etc. 259:factually accurate 430:suitable captions 487: 462: 461: 439: 438: 425: 424: 394: 393: 370: 369: 342: 341: 332: 331: 307: 306: 293: 292: 284:reliable sources 279: 278: 247: 246: 213: 212: 79: 70: 51: 495: 494: 490: 489: 488: 486: 485: 484: 352:It follows the 325:(major aspects) 60: 37: 31: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 493: 491: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 282:(citations to 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 194: 193: 178: 176: 175: 171: 170: 166: 165: 161: 160: 156: 155: 151: 150: 146: 145: 141: 140: 136: 135: 131: 130: 126: 125: 121: 120: 116: 115: 111: 110: 102: 101: 80: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 492: 477: 473: 469: 464: 463: 456: 453: 452: 450: 447: 441: 440: 433: 431: 419: 417: 411: 410: 408: 407: 402: 396: 395: 388: 385: 384: 382: 378: 372: 371: 364: 361: 360: 358: 356: 351: 344: 343: 336: 326: 322: 321: 319: 315: 309: 308: 301: 299: 287: 285: 273: 269: 268: 266: 265: 260: 256: 249: 248: 241: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 207: 203: 202: 200: 196: 195: 192:for criteria) 191: 187: 185: 181: 180: 179: 173: 172: 168: 167: 163: 162: 158: 157: 153: 152: 148: 147: 143: 142: 138: 137: 133: 132: 128: 127: 123: 122: 118: 117: 113: 112: 108: 104: 103: 99: 98: 97: 96: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 77: 73: 68: 64: 59: 58: 54: 49: 45: 41: 36: 35: 26: 19: 454: 448: 427: 413: 404: 386: 380: 362: 353: 334: 324: 317: 295: 281: 272:(references) 271: 262: 258: 215: 205: 198: 182: 177: 83: 82: 75: 71: 57:Article talk 56: 52: 33: 30: 230:word choice 44:visual edit 264:verifiable 455:Pass/Fail 335:(focused) 84:Reviewer: 27:GA Review 449:Overall 234:fiction 206:(prose) 114:History 107:WP:LEAD 67:history 48:history 34:Article 468:Brad78 406:images 381:stable 379:It is 357:policy 316:It is 257:It is 236:, and 226:layout 197:It is 186:review 87:Brad78 238:lists 188:(see 149:Match 76:Watch 16:< 472:talk 261:and 222:lead 220:for 190:here 100:Lead 91:talk 63:edit 40:edit 218:MoS 474:) 457:: 451:: 434:: 426:b 420:: 412:a 389:: 383:. 365:: 359:. 337:: 333:b 327:: 323:a 320:. 302:: 298:OR 294:c 288:: 280:b 274:: 270:a 267:. 242:: 232:, 228:, 224:, 214:b 208:: 204:a 201:. 184:GA 93:) 65:| 46:| 42:| 470:( 432:) 418:) 300:) 296:( 286:) 240:) 216:( 89:( 72:· 69:) 61:( 53:· 50:) 38:(

Index

Talk:Elimination Chamber
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Brad78
talk
23:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
WP:LEAD
GA
here
MoS
lead
layout
word choice
fiction
lists
verifiable
reliable sources
OR
neutral point of view
images
fair use rationales
suitable captions
Brad78
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.