Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Expanding Earth

Source đź“ť

482:
time), with some degree of referencing. He uses these to get various volume estimates for the specimen. Without giving a methodology, he then picks a number from the air for the volume, completely discarding the acknowledged fact that there is a large variation in those volume estimates. That number divided by a weight estimate taken from limb-bone circumference estimates (no consideration for the bone shape, or proportion of cortical vs marrow bone), then gives the number which was desired. Including the variation in volume estimates produces a range which includes modern gravity, demolishing the author's contention.
607:: «Two corner-cube reflectors have been placed on the moon. Three optical observatories at Canberra, Honululu, and Tokyo have telescopes capable of receiving reflected laser light from a lunar corner-cube According to the "plate tectonics" hypotheses these three observatories are approaching each other at a rate of several centimetres per year. According to the expanding earth model they are separating at a few centimetres per year. Remeasurement after a few years would establish the truth.» 304: 64: 395: 294: 186: 273: 165: 85: 196: 33: 546: 531: 614:: «No new crust has been inserted between Hawaii and Japan since the Jurassic, so this arc would appear to be shrinking at 6 cm per year, which is about what NASA finds. But they interpret it as subduction of crust, whereas I interpret it as caused by insertion of new crust between Hawaii and Peru and elsewhere within the Hawaii-Japan great circle.» 477:
I stumbled into another EE-er on Twitter recently who seems to be trying to talk up a self-published book. He's been writing "papers" (no evidence of any peer review, but well presented - spell-checked even!!) on Researchgate, and no doubt is citing them wherever possible. Standard techniques that I
667:
What is missing is comparisons between Plate Tectonics, Planetary Growth Tectonics, Mass redistribution Tectonics, and most importantly a Neutral outlook and presentation of the Concepts. There are dozens of articles on the topic of Expansion Tectonics, several Videos, Many Authors, and lots of
481:
The pile I've just been wading though is a re-hash (with, thankfully, references) of the "sauropod size" argument given above. The slightly useful content is that there is a compendium of size models for Giraffatitan (Brachisaurus, the 1909-1912 specimen from Tanzania / Tanganyika Colony at the
335: 492: 370: 754: 360: 759: 739: 330: 147: 562:
As with most brand new studies, it's best to wait and see whether this becomes accepted and/or backed up by other studies before mentioning it in this article.
749: 493:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329586654_A_palaeogravity_calculation_based_on_weight_and_mass_estimates_of_Giraffatitan_Brachiosaurus_brancai/stats
719: 137: 326: 317: 278: 255: 652: 623: 734: 724: 245: 113: 671:
However, whoever is controlling this version is definitely was too Negative to be even consider a Positive Outlook, and real Neutral comparisons.
744: 648: 619: 714: 633: 92: 69: 672: 729: 221: 212: 170: 44: 428: 423: 418: 413: 325:
content on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
112:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
459: 322: 668:
compelling evidence that both Plate Tectonics and Expansion Tectonics have good concepts to look at and compare.
309: 687: 438: 50: 637: 676: 515: 695: 588: 567: 552: 537: 522: 32: 632:
This is flawed as even rulers would have to expand for this idea to work. So it is not testable.
501: 444: 488:
I suppose I'd better give a link to the Researchgate "paper", and post these criticisms there.
220:
resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
440: 394: 84: 63: 17: 691: 584: 563: 548: 533: 518: 201: 293: 272: 708: 497: 105: 101: 216:, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use 195: 185: 164: 611: 604: 516:
Atmospheric acceleration and Earth-expansion deceleration of the Earth rotation
299: 191: 109: 442: 699: 680: 656: 641: 627: 592: 582: 571: 556: 541: 526: 505: 217: 97: 445: 388: 26: 618:
The Expanding Earth thesis is garbage and always has been.
329:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 96:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 478:remember from EE-ers on USENET back in the 1990s. 345:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History of Science 453:This page has archives. Sections older than 336:History of Science Collaboration of the Month 8: 647:I have no idea what you are talking about. 755:Low-importance history of science articles 267: 159: 58: 321:, an attempt to improve and organize the 760:WikiProject History of Science articles 740:Low-importance B-Class Geology articles 348:Template:WikiProject History of Science 269: 161: 60: 30: 463:when more than 5 sections are present. 122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism 7: 90:This article is within the scope of 750:B-Class history of science articles 230:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Geology 49:It is of interest to the following 720:Mid-importance Skepticism articles 25: 690:for why that won't be happening. 457:may be automatically archived by 393: 302: 292: 271: 194: 184: 163: 83: 62: 31: 735:Low-importance Geology articles 725:WikiProject Skepticism articles 365:This article has been rated as 250:This article has been rated as 142:This article has been rated as 125:Template:WikiProject Skepticism 333:. You can also help with the 318:History of Science WikiProject 1: 663:The Importance of Comparisons 649:Visite fortuitement prolongée 620:Visite fortuitement prolongée 116:and see a list of open tasks. 745:WikiProject Geology articles 628:22:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 593:21:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 572:22:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 557:20:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 542:19:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 527:19:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 506:14:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 485:Typical fare from an EE-er. 315:This article is part of the 233:Template:WikiProject Geology 715:B-Class Skepticism articles 351:history of science articles 18:Talk:Expanding earth theory 776: 700:07:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC) 681:00:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) 473:2018 Self-published volume 371:project's importance scale 256:project's importance scale 148:project's importance scale 364: 310:History of science portal 287: 249: 179: 141: 78: 57: 730:B-Class Geology articles 657:10:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 642:17:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC) 460:Lowercase sigmabot III 93:WikiProject Skepticism 39:This article is rated 224:for more information. 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 208:Talk:Expanding Earth 213:WikiProject Geology 128:Skepticism articles 342:History of Science 323:history of science 279:History of Science 45:content assessment 467: 466: 385: 384: 381: 380: 377: 376: 266: 265: 262: 261: 158: 157: 154: 153: 16:(Redirected from 767: 462: 446: 397: 389: 353: 352: 349: 346: 343: 312: 307: 306: 305: 296: 289: 288: 283: 275: 268: 238: 237: 236:Geology articles 234: 231: 228: 204: 199: 198: 188: 181: 180: 175: 167: 160: 130: 129: 126: 123: 120: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 775: 774: 770: 769: 768: 766: 765: 764: 705: 704: 688:WP:FALSEBALANCE 665: 600: 580: 513: 475: 458: 447: 441: 402: 350: 347: 344: 341: 340: 308: 303: 301: 281: 235: 232: 229: 226: 225: 200: 193: 173: 127: 124: 121: 118: 117: 72: 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 773: 771: 763: 762: 757: 752: 747: 742: 737: 732: 727: 722: 717: 707: 706: 703: 702: 664: 661: 660: 659: 616: 615: 610:Samuel Carey, 608: 603:Samuel Carey, 599: 596: 579: 576: 575: 574: 512: 509: 474: 471: 469: 465: 464: 452: 449: 448: 443: 439: 437: 434: 433: 432: 431: 426: 421: 416: 408: 407: 404: 403: 398: 392: 383: 382: 379: 378: 375: 374: 367:Low-importance 363: 357: 356: 354: 314: 313: 297: 285: 284: 282:Low‑importance 276: 264: 263: 260: 259: 252:Low-importance 248: 242: 241: 239: 206: 205: 202:Geology portal 189: 177: 176: 174:Low‑importance 168: 156: 155: 152: 151: 144:Mid-importance 140: 134: 133: 131: 114:the discussion 88: 76: 75: 73:Mid‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 772: 761: 758: 756: 753: 751: 748: 746: 743: 741: 738: 736: 733: 731: 728: 726: 723: 721: 718: 716: 713: 712: 710: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 684: 683: 682: 678: 674: 669: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 634:50.35.113.183 630: 629: 625: 621: 613: 609: 606: 602: 601: 597: 595: 594: 590: 586: 583: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 560: 559: 558: 554: 550: 547: 544: 543: 539: 535: 532: 529: 528: 524: 520: 517: 510: 508: 507: 503: 499: 495: 494: 489: 486: 483: 479: 472: 470: 461: 456: 451: 450: 436: 435: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 411: 410: 409: 406: 405: 401: 396: 391: 390: 387: 372: 368: 362: 359: 358: 355: 338: 337: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 311: 300: 298: 295: 291: 290: 286: 280: 277: 274: 270: 257: 253: 247: 244: 243: 240: 223: 219: 215: 214: 209: 203: 197: 192: 190: 187: 183: 182: 178: 172: 169: 166: 162: 149: 145: 139: 136: 135: 132: 115: 111: 107: 106:pseudohistory 103: 102:pseudoscience 99: 95: 94: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 673:24.9.221.181 670: 666: 631: 617: 581: 545: 530: 514: 496: 490: 487: 484: 480: 476: 468: 454: 399: 386: 366: 334: 327:project page 316: 251: 222:project page 211: 207: 143: 91: 51:WikiProjects 210:is part of 709:Categories 692:Mikenorton 585:Sciencia58 578:Historical 564:Mikenorton 549:Sciencia58 534:Sciencia58 519:Sciencia58 331:discussion 119:Skepticism 110:skepticism 70:Skepticism 511:New Study 424:2011–2013 419:2009–2010 414:2006–2008 400:Archives 598:2023-01 498:AKarley 455:90 days 369:on the 254:on the 227:Geology 218:geology 171:Geology 146:on the 98:science 41:B-class 491:Paper 47:scale. 429:2013- 696:talk 686:See 677:talk 653:talk 638:talk 624:talk 612:1994 605:1976 589:talk 568:talk 553:talk 538:talk 523:talk 502:talk 108:and 361:Low 246:Low 138:Mid 711:: 698:) 679:) 655:) 640:) 626:) 591:) 570:) 555:) 540:) 525:) 504:) 104:, 100:, 694:( 675:( 651:( 636:( 622:( 587:( 566:( 551:( 536:( 521:( 500:( 373:. 339:. 258:. 150:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:Expanding earth theory

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Skepticism
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Skepticism
science
pseudoscience
pseudohistory
skepticism
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Geology
WikiProject icon
icon
Geology portal
WikiProject Geology
geology
project page
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
History of Science
WikiProject icon
History of science portal
History of Science WikiProject

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑