21:
922:- one appears to be an animal (hedgehog) and perhaps another (antennapedia), but the other three listed are... only discover that all five links are for genes ... not the animals. Do we need to link the genes in the lead? Otherwise, we need some way of making it clear that the hedgehog link is NOT to an animal but to a gene named after it - I note that the actual link redirects to "Hedgehog signaling pathway"?
948:"and about the fish's likely direction of travel" this was hard to parse because the verb ("decieve") was so distant and so much took place between the verb and this phrase... Suggest "This may deceive predators in two ways: first, into attacking the tail rather than the more vulnerable head, and second, about the fish's likely direction of travel. For fish with eyespots, it is an example of self-mimicry."
878:
855:
837:
806:
782:
755:
741:
712:
694:
680:
666:
631:
597:
76:
128:
202:
107:
443:
935:"Butterfly eyespots can mimic dead leaves for camouflage from predators, as seen in Bicyclus anynana; this is a response to a seasonal fall in temperature, causing a shift in selection towards smaller, less conspicuous eyespots." this seems to imply that the size of the spots on this species change with the seasons?
1024:
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise
921:
And continuing in that sentence "...by a small number of genes active in embryonic development of a wide range of animals, including
Engrailed, Distal-less, Hedgehog, Antennapedia, and the Notch signaling pathway." is confusing. I was expecting a list of animals - and I got well, when they are listed
338:
Well, we could. It's obviously your responsibility if you import images to put them somewhere sensible - space for images is always limited, and many editors object strongly to image clutter (specially at GA, and even more at FA). It's not generally all right, therefore, simply to import images that
277:
Possibly related to the 2010 comment about the article's title, the lead needs rewriting. It sets out several contradictory theories, directly cites recent primary sources (research papers, not review articles or books that discuss and place the research into context) - and it shouldn't contain refs
320:
I migrated some examples from the page "Automimicry" to here, because they are more appropriately placed in this page. Some of the pictures are quite nice, but I don't know how to arrange them on the page. Some appear all the way down by /*Morphogenesis*/Â :( Can someone with more Wiki skills please
300:
List of refs needs to go back a bit to get some historical perspective, with a section on 'Early research' or just 'History' - Cott of course; and Messrs Darwin, Wallace, Bates do rather need a mention. So, we rewrite the lead, and the body, and the refs. Guess that at least leaves the article name
894:
Second paragraph - both sentences start with "Eyespots..." and the first sentence is very convoluted - can we break it up somewhat and make it more accessible? Remember the lead is often times the only section that's read and if it's too dense, the reader will usually just give up.
1084:
Well, mine is dependent on a mobile hotspot that was going up and downhill in the TN foothills! And my poor laptop was also bouncing around a bit on the folding table... so it was a bit difficult to type well. We're stopped for a while now ... so passing this - looks good.
363:
After that you can set the parameter |left to place one or two images on the left hand side - that takes care, as you don't want to foul up section headings, quotes, or tables, nor do we want the text squeezed between a pair of images as the window is resized.
214:
278:
or discussion that aren't in the diminutive article body either, and mumbles repetitively about possibly not being functional. Cott 1940 was crystal clear that eyespots were highly functional, and nobody frankly has contradicted that.
1001:
909:
Similarly, third paragraph - I know you link "Morphogenesis" but it's not easy to get the meaning from the sentence itself - perhaps use "The biological process that forms the shape (or
178:
354:
The first thing is simply to paste in each image in the section where you want it, and as a quick rule of thumb, no more than one per section unless there's a lot of text there.
1025:
mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.
1056:
I've seen it but I'm currently winding through the mountains in
Tennessee with a ... variable ... internet connection. Should be more stable this afternoon, I'm hoping...
448:
575:
619:
481:
1148:
471:
168:
829:
297:), and rewritten lead that makes these points shortly and sweetly. Of these, I think mimicry is just part of the deimatic/aposematic signalling effect.
1153:
938:
Yes, though once a butterfly has grown to be an adult, its spots are fixed, so its the season of "birth" that determines spot size. Adjusted the text.
226:
1014:
I did do some copyediting, please make sure I didn't change any sourced text beyond what the sources will support or that I haven't broken anything.
990:
Nothing wrong in this section, just noting that I mostly understood it! (Not bad for a medievalist with a horsewoman's understanding of genetics...)
623:
615:
32:
1138:
453:
1143:
672:
607:
289:
honest signal where applicable; strong resemblance to vertebrate predator (binocular vision) eyes, i.e. mimicry in service of deimatic effect;
144:
46:
847:
565:
393:
135:
112:
1133:
843:
658:
611:
768:
571:
476:
38:
686:
520:
87:
249:
Since it seems clear that they aren't always used in mimicry, and may not be at all, perhaps a more neutral name like
499:
53:
603:
1099:
Many thanks. How nice to be allowed out all day. We can go for one exercise walk, from our own front door only.
1104:
1075:
1047:
648:
551:
415:
369:
306:
747:
733:
495:
397:
20:
93:
250:
704:
700:
389:
258:
322:
341:
326:
143:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1100:
1090:
1071:
1061:
1043:
1030:
547:
534:
514:
411:
365:
302:
234:
205:
This article was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
42:
819:
310:
254:
1070:
My connection is a bit better, working well now after 2 engineers worked on it today...
218:
1042:
Excellent, many thanks for the review. I think I've done everything you've asked for.
1127:
1086:
1057:
1039:
1026:
910:
530:
510:
230:
339:
are "quite nice" - the criterion for inclusion is not "could do with it" but (as in
201:
140:
127:
106:
969:
Link for "source/diffusion model" "source/threshold model" and "sink model"?
1108:
1094:
1079:
1065:
1051:
1034:
555:
538:
524:
502:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
419:
401:
373:
330:
262:
238:
345:) "can't do without it". So please remove anything that isn't ESSENTIAL.
1000:
I randomly googled three phrases and only turned up
Knowledge mirrors.
281:
Suggest the article needs new clear section on each of the theories (
410:
It rightly doesn't. If you know otherwise, cite your evidence here.
69:
15:
59:
972:
Added one link, the others are explained in the text.
196:
Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment
913:) of eyespots is controlled by a small number of.."
139:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
956:link for "spotted mandarin fish" and "spotted ray"
823:and other media, where possible and appropriate.
301:unchanged ... 'course, we could change that too.
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
828:(images are tagged and non-free content have
8:
529:I'll get to this in the next few days. --
431:
387:
101:
227:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
462:
434:
225:Above undated message substituted from
103:
898:Reworded, and split the long sentence.
977:Link for "repressing transcription"?
7:
386:This does not mention cockroaches.
133:This article is within the scope of
75:
73:
1149:Mid-importance Lepidoptera articles
92:It is of interest to the following
273:Confused lead, what's the message?
210:
206:
14:
153:Knowledge:WikiProject Lepidoptera
41:. If you can improve it further,
1154:WikiProject Lepidoptera articles
925:Ah yes. Rearranged the sentence.
876:
853:
835:
804:
780:
777:Fair representation without bias
753:
739:
710:
692:
678:
664:
629:
595:
546:Many thanks for taking this on.
295:spandrel' accident/morphogenesis
213:. Further details are available
200:
156:Template:WikiProject Lepidoptera
126:
105:
74:
19:
574:for what the criteria are, and
173:This article has been rated as
1139:Natural sciences good articles
592:(prose, spelling, and grammar)
420:12:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
402:12:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
374:08:42, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
331:00:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
33:Natural sciences good articles
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1144:GA-Class Lepidoptera articles
147:and see a list of open tasks.
1109:10:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
1095:21:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
1080:18:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
1066:17:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
1052:21:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
1035:19:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
877:
854:
836:
805:
781:
754:
740:
711:
693:
679:
665:
630:
596:
311:08:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
272:
239:21:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
556:16:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
539:16:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
525:16:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
1170:
500:Talk:Eyespot (mimicry)/GA1
293:; sometimes perhaps just '
263:11:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
179:project's importance scale
172:
121:
100:
1134:Knowledge good articles
1004:no copyright concerns.
585:reasonably well written
382:What about cockroaches?
287:aposematic/foul-tasting
136:WikiProject Lepidoptera
578:for what they are not)
321:edit their placement?
82:This article is rated
817:It is illustrated by
769:neutral point of view
725:broad in its coverage
217:. Student editor(s):
141:butterflies and moths
57:: January 15, 2021. (
39:good article criteria
916:Good idea, reworded.
268:I agree with Richard
159:Lepidoptera articles
830:fair use rationales
342:Three Men in a Boat
801:No edit wars, etc.
644:factually accurate
215:on the course page
88:content assessment
848:suitable captions
659:reference section
490:
489:
404:
392:comment added by
251:eyespot (marking)
193:
192:
189:
188:
185:
184:
68:
67:
64:
27:Eyespot (mimicry)
1161:
932:In butterflies:
880:
879:
857:
856:
839:
838:
808:
807:
784:
783:
757:
756:
743:
742:
714:
713:
696:
695:
682:
681:
673:reliable sources
668:
667:
633:
632:
599:
598:
444:Copyvio detector
432:
291:sexual selection
283:deimatic/startle
241:
212:
211:15 December 2018
208:
204:
161:
160:
157:
154:
151:
130:
123:
122:
117:
109:
102:
85:
79:
78:
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1124:
1123:
966:Morphogenesis:
844:appropriate use
766:It follows the
494:This review is
486:
458:
430:
384:
318:
316:Image Placement
275:
247:
224:
198:
158:
155:
152:
149:
148:
115:
86:on Knowledge's
83:
58:
12:
11:
5:
1167:
1165:
1157:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1126:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
975:
974:
973:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
954:
953:
952:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
919:
918:
917:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
671:(citations to
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
580:
579:
561:
560:
559:
558:
505:
504:
488:
487:
485:
484:
479:
474:
468:
465:
464:
460:
459:
457:
456:
454:External links
451:
446:
440:
437:
436:
429:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
383:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
358:
357:
356:
355:
349:
348:
347:
346:
317:
314:
274:
271:
270:
269:
253:is desirable?
246:
243:
207:1 October 2018
197:
194:
191:
190:
187:
186:
183:
182:
175:Mid-importance
171:
165:
164:
162:
145:the discussion
131:
119:
118:
116:Mid‑importance
110:
98:
97:
91:
80:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1166:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1129:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1101:Chiswick Chap
1098:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1072:Chiswick Chap
1069:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1044:Chiswick Chap
1041:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1023:
1022:
1016:
1015:
1013:
1012:
1007:Just as well.
1006:
1005:
1003:
1002:Earwig's tool
999:
992:
991:
989:
988:
987:Distal-less:
986:
979:
978:
976:
971:
970:
968:
967:
965:
958:
957:
955:
950:
949:
947:
946:
944:
937:
936:
934:
933:
931:
924:
923:
920:
915:
914:
912:
911:morphogenesis
908:
907:
906:
905:
897:
896:
893:
892:
890:
889:
882:
881:
874:
871:
870:
868:
865:
859:
858:
851:
849:
845:
833:
831:
825:
824:
822:
821:
816:
810:
809:
802:
799:
798:
796:
792:
786:
785:
778:
775:
774:
772:
770:
765:
759:
758:
751:
749:
737:
735:
734:major aspects
729:
728:
726:
722:
716:
715:
708:
706:
702:
690:
688:
676:
674:
662:
660:
654:
653:
651:
650:
645:
641:
635:
634:
627:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
593:
589:
588:
586:
582:
581:
577:
573:
569:
567:
563:
562:
557:
553:
549:
548:Chiswick Chap
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
536:
532:
527:
526:
522:
519:
516:
512:
509:
503:
501:
497:
492:
491:
483:
480:
478:
475:
473:
470:
469:
467:
466:
461:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
441:
439:
438:
433:
427:
421:
417:
413:
412:Chiswick Chap
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
381:
375:
371:
367:
366:Chiswick Chap
362:
361:
360:
359:
353:
352:
351:
350:
344:
343:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
315:
313:
312:
308:
304:
303:Chiswick Chap
298:
296:
292:
288:
285:; mention of
284:
279:
267:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
244:
242:
240:
236:
232:
228:
222:
220:
216:
203:
195:
180:
176:
170:
167:
166:
163:
146:
142:
138:
137:
132:
129:
125:
124:
120:
114:
111:
108:
104:
99:
95:
89:
81:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
872:
866:
841:
827:
818:
800:
794:
776:
767:
745:
731:
724:
698:
684:
670:
656:
647:
643:
601:
591:
584:
564:
528:
517:
507:
506:
493:
482:Instructions
394:72.21.196.65
388:— Preceding
385:
340:
319:
299:
294:
290:
286:
282:
280:
276:
248:
245:Article name
223:
199:
174:
134:
94:WikiProjects
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
616:word choice
496:transcluded
150:Lepidoptera
113:Lepidoptera
1128:Categories
1017:Thank you.
705:plagiarism
649:verifiable
449:Authorship
435:GA toolbox
255:Richard001
37:under the
945:In fish:
873:Pass/Fail
508:Reviewer:
472:Templates
463:Reviewing
428:GA Review
323:Dwkikuchi
219:Iriscmire
1087:Ealdgyth
1058:Ealdgyth
1040:Ealdgyth
1027:Ealdgyth
531:Ealdgyth
521:contribs
511:Ealdgyth
477:Criteria
390:unsigned
231:PrimeBOT
84:GA-class
47:reassess
993:Thanks!
951:Edited.
867:Overall
748:focused
701:copyvio
620:fiction
177:on the
980:Added.
959:Added.
891:Lead:
820:images
795:stable
793:It is
771:policy
723:It is
642:It is
622:, and
612:layout
583:It is
568:review
90:scale.
54:Review
846:with
624:lists
570:(see
498:from
1105:talk
1091:talk
1076:talk
1062:talk
1048:talk
1031:talk
703:and
646:and
608:lead
606:for
576:here
572:here
552:talk
535:talk
515:talk
416:talk
398:talk
370:talk
327:talk
307:talk
259:talk
235:talk
209:and
604:MoS
229:by
169:Mid
49:it.
1130::
1107:)
1093:)
1078:)
1064:)
1050:)
1033:)
875::
869::
852::
840:b
834::
826:a
803::
797:.
779::
773:.
752::
744:b
738::
730:a
727:.
709::
697:d
691::
687:OR
683:c
677::
669:b
663::
655:a
652:.
628::
618:,
614:,
610:,
600:b
594::
590:a
587:.
566:GA
554:)
537:)
523:)
418:)
400:)
372:)
329:)
309:)
261:)
237:)
221:.
63:).
1103:(
1089:(
1074:(
1060:(
1046:(
1029:(
850:)
842:(
832:)
750:)
746:(
736:)
732:(
707:)
699:(
689:)
685:(
675:)
661:)
657:(
626:)
602:(
550:(
533:(
518:·
513:(
414:(
396:(
368:(
325:(
305:(
257:(
233:(
181:.
96::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
