Talk:February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm

2186:– After some thinking, I believe that a merger may be the best course of action for the 3 articles in question. While I'm normally staunchly opposed to merging the articles for subjects that are clearly distinct, Winter Storms Uri and Viola and the cold wave all have overlapping impacts in most of the regions that they struck, especially in the Southern US. While the meteorological history and the immediate impacts of these storms and the cold wave can be clearly separated, the same cannot be said for the aftermath, which sees all 3 of these events blend together in a way that cannot be separated. Even though Winter Storm Uri (the storm primarily responsible for wrecking Texas's power grid and the ensuing energy crisis) has the vast majority of the impacts, both Winter Storm Viola and the cold wave also struck the same areas either concurrently or within a week, meaning that some of their impacts are intertwined as well. Moreover, most reliable sources that I've seen don't even both separating out the impacts or the aftermath for the storms/event in question here (aside from some of the immediate impacts), which makes fully separating these events difficult. This also negatively affects the quality of the articles. Right now, we have one somewhat-extensive article for Winter Storm Uri (but still largely incomplete), and two more shorter articles for Winter Storms Viola and the cold wave that are definitely incomplete, but cannot be expanded much further on their own. As things are right now, it is impossible for all 3 articles to reach GA status independently, let alone FA status. However, a combined article would be much stronger and would be able to reach those levels of quality. Consequently, I believe that a merger may be the best way forward. If we are to merge these articles, I think that we should follow a format similar to 2513:

cold wave. The report details the entire disaster that hit Texas. It is treated as one continuous disaster by NOAA and AON and thus should receive an article detailing its impact in such a manner. It would make no sense to make an article about the effects of the coldwave there, then another about the snow from X storm, etc... It should be covered together as impact was either occurring concurrently or directly after another. Yes, they should have separate meteorological subsections, but their impact should be covered together. The same thing happened in Mexico with the cold wave causing damage at the same time as either of the two winter storms. It's continuous impact and listed as a single, continuous disaster.

2086:

subheading under impact. Also, the "Aftermath" section is extremely short and could benefit from additional information about the long-term consequences of the storm, such as legislative plans to improve Texas' energy infrastructure. One other potential change could be to separate the "Preparations and impact" section into two separate section with a more concise summary of preparations and a full section just for "Impact" detailing the storm's effects. I think this would aid the organizational clarity. Also, even though there is already a separate page on the Texas power crisis, including a separate section on this page referencing the Texas power grid's failure could be beneficial for additional context.

1138:

to use The Weather Channel's names as the title for any of those storms, and since it is an unofficial practice (not endorsed or done by any of the U.S. agencies), there really isn't a right or a wrong way of handling the names. I don't see how further arguing over this issue will lead to anything productive. As long as our articles are accurate and of decent quality, I think we're okay. And the two storms are clearly separate systems. "Tabita" is the disorganized mess that moved off the East Coast of the U.S. on February 14, while "Uri" is the historic storm currently moving out of Texas and across the Eastern U.S. right now.

1630:, will make this page woefully too long, and it can be split easily at that time; or it will be discovered that the information that exists and merits placement in Knowledge (XXG) can be covered sufficiently here without making the page longer. Subpages/spinoff pages are not created simply because it may warrant it - editorial discretion to keep articles manageable in size (not too short/specific, not too long/broad) does. And as of right now, the amount of content regarding Texas impacts in this page does not merit spinning it off at all. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ( 2782:), the NOAA damage total (generally from NCEI) should be used for infoboxes, but other sources can be mentioned in the article. Just the NOAA damage total (being the official damage total given to the storm system) is the one used in infoboxes. That sentence would ok perfectly fine for the article, except it should make clear which source is giving that damage total and have the wording changed to make it "possibly the costliest..." since that damage total would not be official from NOAA. Perfect example of this usage is 1868:

effects on Texan society. One of the dominant streams of discussion around this storm is how the effects of this storm is disproportionately affecting minority populations in Texan metros. The reason why this disproportionate effect occurs is because of longer-term deregulations and shorter-term responses, especially attitudes of climate change denial amongst legislators. I feel that a meteorological article and a societal article have different standards of cause-and-effect which should not be mixed here.

1449:- we don't censor or change our content just because a government agency wants it to be that way. I am unsure if the name is the common name for the storm or not, but these sorts of arguments were not helpful, nor was the early close before anyone could combat such arguments. I also think that the use of these names should be revisited as a whole based on the fact that they are now in very common usage across multiple media outlets, thus making the names frequently the common name. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ( 667: 604: 636: 497: 770: 1534:, including by the United Kingdom Met Office and Met Eireann. While the majority of highs and low in Europe year-round get named by FU Berlin, which as far as I know is backed by the German Met Service. Thirdly you are ignoring the fact that TWC has been naming for 9 years now which is a very long time for a marketing ploy. As a result, I feel that its fine to include the names in Knowledge (XXG) articles, especially since we are not censored. 677: 218: 782: 1766: 810: 487: 460: 376: 355: 2252:

brief summary of the effects outside those regions, however, most of that will be in the combined article (broader coverage at X). I added the ability for multiple RSI bars to exist so Uri and Viola can both be in the infobox with their stats. The combined article would be organized appropriately. Basically, this turns the proposal into just merging the coldwave in the southern plains, Uri, and Viola.

287: 266: 235: 190: 386: 822: 1122:? This statement comes from the NWS: "The National Weather Service does not name winter storms because a winter storm's impact can vary from one location to another, and storms can weaken and redevelop, making it difficult to define where one ends and another begins." So in other words... yes this could very well be the same storm. - 1769: 1774: 1772: 1768: 1767: 2891:

It appears the $ 25.6 billion figure only includes property damages. If you factor economic losses, utility costs, medical charges, lawsuits, among other things, the $ 195 billion figure makes more sense. Usually, damages from natural disasters refer to property losses, and economic losses (which are

2336:

Im sorry, but you are mistaken about there being significant northern plain impacts. It was in the southern plains where the storm was bad. Keep in mind the impacts in the NE can be separated, but the aftermath/cleanup is the same. It was about 1-2 days or so apart in both the southern plains and the

1940:

While I completely understand why people do not want to support a "commercialization" of storms/disasters/etc, this is a much different situation than when TWC first introduced their naming system. As of now, even Google has taken on the name Winter Storm Uri, as have multiple other reliable sources,

1867:

I think using this article to speak about the meteorology and geography of the storm, and linking it to an article focused on its social and political effects in Texas would benefit readers. That article could highlight infrastructural neglect, inequality in the water and power grid, and track longer

2991:

got an update when the billion dollar disaster list was updated in October 2022, but it occurred the previous week and search/rescue was still ongoing, so it was updated again in the January 2023 update to the list, which finalized the information. Had Ian occurred beginning of September rather than

2223:

I strongly think we need to enact a merge moratorium on here as well given recent tendencies to merge just because a few impacts from one storm are not able to be separated from one. Plus, the cold wave started way before these two storms struck (about a week or so around the 6th) so merging that is

2153:

as well since it directly followed the February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm and largely compounded its effects. I'm thinking it may be a better idea to discuss this by area rather than by storm. The aftermaths are overlapping significantly and the cold temps of the coldwave were still in

1773: 2858:

One would hope that the NCEI would have taken the damage estimate from the Storm Events Database which is compiled by local officials, but anyway have we got any more sources backing up the $ 196.5 billion as the total, as it seems a bit much to call it the worst natural disaster in the US based on

1982:

I don't think the article should be renamed to Winter Storm Uri, as I haven't seen it be used before reading this article and I live in Houston. I do think it should have a simpler name than "February 13-17, 2021 North American winter storm"; it's not very catchy and a pain to type out. Just my two

1937:. The current title is not natural, as most people do not discuss storms in terms of dates past a month. The current title is not concise because... well that one should be obvious. The proposed title is recognizable, natural, precise, and concise - which meets almost all of the criteria for naming. 1661:

Yes, it should be a separate article, to not unbalance this article. It involves matters not directly related to this storm, since it involves the politics of windmills, underinvestment, political deflection, the failure of the natural gas system, and also of coal; and CNN is showing hte failure of

1529:

You can call TWC's naming of weather systems a marketing effort to draw attention to their reporting, however, that argument ignores several facts that need to be taken into consideration. Firstly, not all tropical cyclone naming is official and we would use unofficial names if a system was notable

1137:

It's all a matter of opinion. While I personally support the practice of naming winter storms (in line with what UK Met and FU Berlin have been doing over in Europe), I will not force the issue on WP, and I don't think that we should make a big fuss over this controversy either. We have decided not

2953:

If we use NCEI, we have to be wary of the implications. That would mean this would not be the costliest storm in American, or even Texan history. We’d need to update this across every single article that uses the total. Also, NOAA Billions accounts for inflation. That $ 25.6b needs to be marked as

2800:

I took a shot at fixing the wording and I fixed the infobox. I'm not sure when it was added, but I see Cabin134, aka a blocked sock master who was involved in pushing Aon damage totals for everything over NOAA damage totals in the article's history. Easy fix though. I'm not sure the best way to do

2251:

MarioProt and I have discussed in detail off-wiki about related structures and have come to a compromise that the coldwave article will continue to exist, however, it will primarily focus on the effects in the west north central states, some of the northwestern midwest, and Canada. It would have a

2512:

People took those numbers from the articles and simply added them there without any thought as to what they actually mean. The total that was given for the 210 to 702 is the total deaths estimated in Texas between all three of those. Texas doesn't separate the impact between the winter storms and

2416:

Here is a rough breakdown for the combined article given my comment above about the coldwave existing still but with a narrower scope. It's too difficult to make an exact outline not knowing how much exists source-wise. The met section would be split into three separate subsections related to the

1645:

I also feel there should be a separate page (e.g. Texas Winter Storm and Energy Crisis). Already the section on Texas is longer than any other section in this article, and there is still a lot more information to add: the federal response, background on Texas' independent power grid, food supply

1646:

chain breakdown... I think it is easily enough content to warrant its own article. Moreover, many people are searching for information on the crisis in Texas now and they are much less likely to find it if it is all contained under the heading "February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm."

2996:, which also includes 2022 USD style damage from Cuba and the January 2023 NCEI damage for the US), but keep the infobox to what would be classified the more "official" information. That said, this discussion should focus more on what the official US information is: NOAA or local government. 2085:

This article does not address how the storm impacted low-income and minority communities disproportionately (especially in Houston), especially since these communities were also those already hit hardest by the pandemic. I think it would be a valuable addition either as a separate heading or

881:

You can upload the pictures first, or create a commons category and then upload the pictures. If there are pictures, I can create a category on Commons. It will probably be under something like "Mid-February 2021 North American winter storm" or "Mid-February 2021 North American blizzard".

1487:

Tropical storms naming are officially recognized globally. Unofficially recognized naming of winter storms by the weather channel is a weather marketing effort to draw attention to their reporting. I do not think promoting TWC's unofficial naming is appropriate in this or other storm

1771: 1507:

the alternative name should be prominent and bolded for readers to see that they've arrived at the right article. Sure, it may be a marketing tactic, but that doesn't mean we can ignore it when it is widely used by the public and multiple other news organizations. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez

1359:, "Entities from the United States government, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Weather Service (NWS), have stated that they would not be naming winter storms, and have asked others to refrain from doing so." 2274:

If you are okay with this alt proposal as I discussed with you and list above, I will close this discussion with consensus for that alt proposal (originally started on October 20 and adjusted my comment to October 23) as long as nobody else has any objections.

2739:

In the article, it says that, "The system is estimated to have cost over $ 196.5 billion (2021 USD) in damages ... making it the costliest winter storm on record, as well as the costliest natural disaster recorded in the United States." However, NECI in their

153: 1082:

No. We rarely make articles for multiple storms together. In the vast majority of cases, each notable storm gets its own article. The only exception would be if a large group of storms occurred in rapid succession and had overlapping impacts, such as

1838:

I really think the main image should be of the storm or a map of its impacts over the southern plains / Texas. Virtually none of the most historic / significant impacts were in the Northeast yet that is where the storm is in the infobox's graphic.

2875:

Also, don't change something when a discussion is ongoing. That's a big no no that pisses some people off and can lead to edit wars. When something is being discussed, the status quo should remain until a consensus is reached in any discussion.

2929:

Aon damage totals are ok for an article's content (aka text portion of the article), but should not be added in the infobox if a NOAA Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Diasters damage total is present, due to RS use of it over the Aon damage

2815:

We deferred NOAA in favor of the Austin/Travis County government source because local officials would have a better idea of what damage and losses occurred in their area than those at the national level. That's why the 196.5 billion was used.

970:

This is the same storm as the February 11-14 storm complex that impacted the Pacific Northwest and the articles should be merged. An example of this is that they're both named Uri by The Weather Channel, clearly indicating they are related.

2154:

play during the second storm as well. If we are going to get this event to GA or FA, I think we need to cover it by country/state instead of having three articles split by storm and the coldwave. AON and NOAA list this as one whole event.

1530:

enough to deserve an article but not named officially. Hell we can't even say that all of the RSMC/TCWC's (Official warning centers) name tropical cyclones. Secondly, some winter storms are named by weather services associated with the

1275:– As much as I would like using that title, there was already consensus nearly 8 years ago not to use The Weather Channel's names in our titles. The biggest issue here is that the name is unofficial, not to mention that it isn't the 44: 2986:

If you read what the fourth point says, only the infobox would use the damage total. Also, it wouldn't necessary be "2023 USD". NCEI doesn't update the charts much if any passed the following quarter's update (For instance,

2925:

Aon damage totals are acceptable for an articles/storm infobox if a NOAA NCDC damage total is also present. This would have both damage totals in the infobox (format done to this article, Tornado outbreak of March 21–23,

923:. I chose that name as the current naming scheme of this page necessitates daily changes, and that's a bit of a pain for categories (I'm going to open a RM here, too, as I think a more consistent name would be better). 2992:

end of September, the October update probably would have had a much larger update with the January update barely changing anything.) Basically, we would put all the information in the text of the article (similarly to

865:

Will this winter storm get a commons category, since I may get some pictures of this storm. My city currently has a 75% chance of snow at the moment, so I will likely get pictures of the snow to upload to Wikimedia

2224:

a no-go and can easily have more records or details put in. When this type of event happened in 2015 I was able to separate each event from each other on their own page even though they came in quick succession. --

147: 1066:

The large snowstorm that affected the PMW was Uri the one that brought the ice storm to the Mid Atlantic. How about we create and article named "Mid February North American winter storms" or something like that?

2571: 2675: 2650: 2625: 613: 470: 3149: 1618:

The correct way to approach a question like this is to develop any content that would be used in such an article here. One of two things will happen - the amount of content that can be added (within

1393:

per the reasons above. Winter Storm Uri was the unofficial name by TWC. TWC names are not official, even though it is more popular, and besides, no article has an unofficial name as it's title. ~~ 🏅

1871: 1046:, I think (a) we need to combine the articles because it is really hard to keep track of the different impacts from each or (b) better expound upon both of them because it is a little confusing. 1770: 2487:. If that statement is factually true, then a merge would make no sense as the winter storm and cold wave are entirely separate. I could be wrong, so if I am please correct that statement. 2149:. It would make sense to have a single article covering the entire event rather than splitting it into two. A retitling would also be required here if it is merged. We may also need to merge 2972:

I threw a comment in the wrong section and I can’t find it, it’s in the orphaned refs section. It’s about the implications. I also disagree we should be limited to solely NOAA or Aon, but…

707: 2417:

coldwave and the two storms. The aftermath would be split up as needed by state/region. There would be a record section for cold/snow/ice records. Here is an impact subdivision example:

3048: 2393:

the move. Per reliable sources, the disasters are essentially indistinguishable in terms of impact and aftermath in Mexico as well as the Southern U.S. There is also precedence in the

1947:

A local consensus to violate the naming policy by prohibiting names that are clearly in the best compliance with that policy does not override the project-wide consensus of that policy

2954:

2023 USD, which classes with the $ 1.5b in Mexico is in 2021 USD. Honestly, it’s a bit of a mess no matter what we do. I’d maybe say include a range but that might not be possible. --

1503:

That was great when they first started. Now, multiple organizations unaffiliated with TWC have started using the names in their reporting. As such, a redirect is appropriate, and per

337: 1945:. In international news, the proposed title is used almost exclusively to refer to this storm. For these reasons, I feel that there is no policy-based reason to not move this page. 1934: 3089: 1933:. The current title fails three of those criteria. The proposed title fails only one (consistency, but that can be remedied). The current title is ambiguous, as it overlaps with 327: 3024:

The NECI/NCDC/NOAA damage totals would not make the winter storms the costliest system but the local government one would which is why I want to see more sources backing it up.

2912:. The verdict was voided due to suspected sock editors plus one confirmed sock editor in the discussion. That said, it came out with some good narratives which might be useful: 2603: 2588: 2474: 2470: 2150: 1908: 1214: 724: 24: 3055:

also doesn’t even mention Uri in the top 10. In that respect, I feel we should go with $ 25.5b - $ 24b in the US and $ 1.5b in Mexico, of course mentioning the $ 195b estimate.

3124: 1227: 944:

This article is too focused on Dallas area. Texas was undergoing a state-wide crisis. Some paragraphs are not particularly relevant to the broader Texas electricity crisis.

618: 533: 3129: 3084: 1571: 1404: 168: 760: 528: 303: 3119: 2720:

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.

135: 1427:

This was strongly opposed; should we remove or move it from the top of the lead too? Don't think we need to give TWC's naming such prominence, even if not the title.

3144: 750: 2909: 558: 3159: 2935:

Just tossing this out there since a few editors (as well as one who explained the difference between NOAA/Aon totals (direct damage vs direct + assumed damage)).

1230:

in reporting, and is a better name than the daily-changing thing we currently use. I'm open to other options too, I just don't want to have to update this daily.

800: 714: 79: 2595: 1925:. This says that we do not "wait" for an "official" name to be given, and that unofficial names are just as acceptable, and sometimes even more so. Per the 294: 271: 129: 3184: 3164: 3154: 3139: 1998: 1965: 1586: 719: 594: 548: 3079: 442: 2066:

I was thinking we should cover the effects also outside of the US, as the affected regions also say Southern Greenland. Anyone have any info to add? --

125: 2394: 2191: 1084: 2786:, which has the damage total listed with the NOAA (+ Cuba) damage totals, but the article mentions several other damage totals from various sources. 3114: 3052: 2599: 1923:

Knowledge (XXG) does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used

1744: 1356: 1119: 584: 3040: 553: 538: 85: 3099: 432: 175: 3174: 2466: 840: 795: 690: 646: 641: 3134: 3109: 1825: 1561: 1394: 3044: 543: 3104: 3094: 2764: 2187: 2040: 951: 30: 408: 3043:

lists the NOAA damage total of $ 24b (what it was in 2021 USD before adjusting for inflation; use that if NOAA totals are used), as does

1183:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

3179: 3169: 2973: 2955: 2767:

that provides no context on the $ 195 billion. Personally id edge more towards the NCEI, but ill leave it up to other editors to decide.

2555: 141: 1875: 1042:

The two systems were very close to one another and affected the Pacific Northwest just days apart, but they are NOT the same. However,

3056: 1796: 1663: 1360: 1224: 702: 99: 2477:, kills at least 278 people, causes power outages for millions of people across the United States, and causes $ 198.6 billion (2021 2234: 2145:

I suggest merging the coldwave article into this one since they are directly related to each other and NOAA lists them as one event

1531: 1376:

per the reasons stated above. I suggest that the article should be renamed "Mid-February 2021 North American winter storm" instead.

996: 104: 20: 1941:

but not any of the "big" sources such as major national networks. To look at an unbiased view, one can look at news organizations

2112: 1725:

thanks for agreeing with me. i’m not sure why that first person was so negative and rude to my suggestion, but what can you do!

1564: 1467:

is a red link for a reason. I intend to, if I get time soon, open a new move request armed with more information. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (

1397: 698:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

2455:

to the merge. I don't really know exactly why a merge should happen, but my comment and my slight oppose comes more from what "

1560:

for 23 deaths in Texas. Would these be considered as direct or indirect because the article doesn't make it exactly clear. ~~ 🏅

521: 510: 465: 74: 3064: 3033: 3005: 2981: 2963: 2944: 2903: 2884: 2868: 2851: 2838: 2824: 2810: 2795: 2757: 2729: 2563: 2543: 2521: 2496: 2442: 2408: 2373: 2345: 2327: 2283: 2260: 2239: 2215: 2176: 2162: 2128: 2095: 2075: 2060: 2044: 2014: 2010: 1992: 1977: 1958: 1897: 1879: 1854: 1833: 1755: 1734: 1719: 1691: 1671: 1655: 1639: 1612: 1593: 1575: 1543: 1517: 1497: 1476: 1458: 1431: 1408: 1385: 1368: 1347: 1325: 1321: 1300: 1267: 1263: 1243: 1239: 1208: 1204: 1159: 1131: 1112: 1076: 1061: 1057: 1030: 1016: 1001: 980: 959: 936: 932: 903: 875: 399: 360: 246: 2843:

I'm not saying what we did was correct, I was just trying to explain what occurred and why that total was used at that time.

1968:(which I didn't see on the page here), I'm going to not make this an RM yet but post the same comment there. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ( 1441:

bad arguments made here. Yes, there are tons of articles where "unofficial" names are used, and in fact that's exactly what

835: 650: 65: 2140:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2582:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1421:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2554:

While it should be merged, not all the impacts were in Texas. So for instance, the tornado outbreak should be seperated

1464: 1174: 1627: 920: 3010:

Uh NOAA does actually account for inflation. The march 24-28 tornado sequence went from $ 3.2b to $ 3.4b in damage.

2753: 2211: 1296: 1155: 1108: 899: 871: 217: 2610:

article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

109: 2695: 1829: 1745:

https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6521897/oklahoma-national-guard-partnered-with-ohp-assist-motorists-winter-weather

2389:

After further off-wiki discussion with Noah, as well as Noah's rundown of the proposed article structure, I now

2606:'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for 2168:

I would also propose a renaming to "February 2021 North American winter storms and cold wave" to reflect that.

2056: 2036: 1848: 1703: 1127: 1072: 1026: 1012: 976: 955: 1446: 1184: 1007:

In the weather channel article about Uri it says "it's the same system that produced 11.1 inches in Seattle".

252: 234: 986:

They are not the same systems, the 11th-14th system was Tabitha which just moved off the coast last night. --

3001: 2977: 2959: 2940: 2834: 2806: 2791: 2559: 2539: 2492: 2482: 1679: 1445:

exists for. The arguments about the government asking people not to name them further do not apply, because

2116: 2028: 1918: 1784: 1442: 1276: 947: 3060: 2900: 2745: 2741: 2620: 2124: 2091: 1973: 1954: 1792: 1751: 1730: 1667: 1635: 1608: 1513: 1472: 1454: 1364: 1088: 2922:

Aon damage totals are acceptable for an articles/storms infobox if NOAA has not published a damage total.

2032: 1589:

which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —

195:

A news item involving February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s

55: 2749: 2670: 2197: 2071: 1307: 1282: 1141: 1094: 914: 910: 885: 867: 407:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

302:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1946: 1926: 1557: 70: 1864:

Would this article benefit from being split into another one called "2021 Texas Electricity Crisis"?

3029: 2864: 2772: 2700: 2478: 2403: 2366: 2320: 2025:

I think we should to the article about the temperatures, which is the main cause for such an event.

1988: 1984: 1812:

An image of air temperatures and/or departures-from-average following the storm across North America.

1707: 1539: 787: 682: 202: 1279:

of the storm. If we rename, it should be to something like "February 2021 North American blizzard."

603: 2877: 2844: 2817: 2724: 2514: 2435: 2356: 2338: 2276: 2253: 2169: 2155: 2052: 2006: 1840: 1493: 1340: 1317: 1257: 1235: 1200: 1187:

after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1123: 1068: 1051: 1037: 1022: 1008: 972: 928: 496: 299: 161: 2311:. Viola certainly has separable impacts from Uri in the Northeastern United States as well as the 2997: 2936: 2830: 2802: 2801:

the actual wording to separate the NOAA vs Aon damage totals for the US, so feel free to fix it.

2787: 2645: 2535: 2507: 2488: 1893: 1687: 1651: 1381: 666: 635: 520:

and related subjects on Knowledge (XXG). To participate, help improve this article or visit the

1917:– Following on the last RM, which was procedurally closed, I'd like to propose this again. Per 189: 2897: 2120: 2087: 1969: 1950: 1788: 1747: 1726: 1715: 1631: 1604: 1509: 1468: 1450: 1091:(though for the later case, there are 3–4 notable storms that still need their own articles). 51: 2194:, which is doable and will retain all of the information in each of the individual articles. 2398: 2362: 2316: 2269: 2227: 2067: 1043: 989: 1623: 769: 3025: 2860: 2768: 2460: 1699: 1698:

For anyone looking to create more foundational articles, I was looking for an overview at

1535: 2916: 2146: 2051:

The word "temperature" already appears 17 times. What exactly are you proposing? Thanks.

1463:

Even literally Google is calling it "Winter Storm Uri" on their homepage in Chrome now.

2721: 2184:

Weak Support, for merging to "February 2021 North American winter storms and cold wave"

2002: 1524: 1489: 1313: 1253: 1231: 1196: 1047: 924: 502: 1619: 3073: 2993: 2988: 2783: 2779: 1889: 1683: 1647: 1590: 1428: 1377: 695: 391: 1886: 1662:

the public works dept in clearly snow in comparison to the electrified Arkansas. --

1711: 1504: 827: 809: 486: 459: 2598:

to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for

2530:

Ah, that makes sense. In that case, I am changing my slight oppose !vote to a

2744:

only has the damage toll at $ 25.6 billion. This issue was also brought up in

817: 777: 672: 492: 381: 286: 265: 1335:

because that isn't the common name and there is consensus against TWC names.

2919:

Noticeboard discussion conclusion) and can be added to an article's content.

375: 354: 196: 1966:

Talk:February_2021_North_American_ice_storm#Requested_move_17_February_2021

1312:

I'd support a name like that also, I'd just like something not so dynamic.

694:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 2892:

often much more complicated to calculate and take estimates based on the

1680:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Texas_Winter_Storm_and_Power_Crisis,_2021

1706:, but it was just a redirect to a small section. An example article is 516: 2915:

Aon damage totals are a reliable source for damage total information (

404: 2680:

U.S. Climate Normals 2020: U.S. Monthly Climate Normals (1991-2020)

2655:

U.S. Climate Normals 2020: U.S. Monthly Climate Normals (1991-2020)

2630:

U.S. Climate Normals 2020: U.S. Monthly Climate Normals (1991-2020)

2829:

Ah that makes sense. Feel free to revert the changes I made then.

2309:

a few impacts from one storm are not able to be separated from one

1764: 1021:

Also Tabitha was the storm that brought ice to the Mid-Atlantic.

2115:, the previous closes of this request has been disputed due to 2896:

scenario in which the storm never happened) are not included.

228: 184: 15: 2778:

Per previous discussions (tornado outbreak articles & on

2572:

Talk:February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm/Sources

1339:

blizzard since it was just a few counties in the mountains.

1252:

We don't name articles with TWC names. It just won't happen.

966:

This is the same storm as the pacific northwest winter storm

808: 768: 602: 216: 2305:

Neutral merging the code wave and Uri, oppose merging Viola

2910:

Talk:Tornado outbreak of March 21–23, 2022#Use Aon or not?

2602:

in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of

1885:

We are working on a draft for such a separate page here:

1678:

I've created a draft here as a barebones starting point:

1118:

Can we all acknowledge the fact that the Weather Channel

1931:

recognizable, natural, precise, concise, and consistent

1913: 1219: 209: 3051:

explicitly states Ida as the costliest storm in 2021.

1887:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:2021_Texas_power_crisis

1599:

should we add a separate page for the crisis in texas?

160: 3150:

Start-Class United States articles of High-importance

403:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 298:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2705:

NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information

1682:Feel free to add any content you feel is valuable! 1567:𝕾𝖚𝖕𝖊𝖗 𝕮𝖞𝖈𝖑𝖔𝖓𝖎𝖈 𝕾𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖒 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖆 1400:𝕾𝖚𝖕𝖊𝖗 𝕮𝖞𝖈𝖑𝖔𝖓𝖎𝖈 𝕾𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖒 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖆 174: 2361:My bad, I was mistaken about the Northern Plains. 2707:. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2682:. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2657:. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2632:. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2604:February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm 2589:February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm 2151:February 15–20, 2021 North American winter storm 1909:February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm 1437:Um, I'm going to point out that there were some 1215:February 13–16, 2021 North American winter storm 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 25:February 13–17, 2021 North American winter storm 2763:The $ 195 billion seems to have come from this 1778:900 Sea turtles rescued in Corpus Christi Texas 312:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Disaster management 1223:– While the name is "unofficial", it is used 8: 3090:High-importance Disaster management articles 2742:Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters 2596:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting 2481:) in damage. This cold wave also led to the 2908:A similar discussion occurred last year on 1587:Talk:February 2021 North American ice storm 232: 3125:Top-importance Non-tropical storm articles 2428:Part 2. coldwave Temps/damage those caused 2291: 1997:To anyone reading this, please comment at 1943:which don't compete with NBC (who own TWC) 1585:There is a move discussion in progress on 1173:The following is a closed discussion of a 945: 630: 454: 349: 260: 2395:January 2010 North American winter storms 2192:January 2010 North American winter storms 1085:January 2010 North American winter storms 735:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 3130:WikiProject Non-tropical storms articles 3085:Start-Class Disaster management articles 1603:it seems it could warrant its own thing 1357:Winter storm naming in the United States 315:Template:WikiProject Disaster management 3120:Start-Class Non-tropical storm articles 1872:2600:1700:5890:69F0:65CE:7A05:F167:FFB0 632: 456: 351: 262: 3145:High-importance United States articles 2464: 2308: 1930: 1922: 3160:Low-importance Massachusetts articles 2485:which resulted in 210 to 702 deaths." 7: 3080:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles 2434:Part 4. Second storm and its damage 2188:Tropical storms Amanda and Cristobal 2136:The following discussion is closed. 1192:The result of the move request was: 688:This article is within the scope of 508:This article is within the scope of 397:This article is within the scope of 292:This article is within the scope of 2626:"Station: Fayetteville EXP STN, AR" 1120:names storms for publicity purposes 919:I've created a Commons category at 569:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Weather 251:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3185:WikiProject United States articles 3165:WikiProject Massachusetts articles 3155:Start-Class Massachusetts articles 3140:Start-Class United States articles 2431:Part 3. First storm and its damage 1740:Bunch of images from Oklahoma here 1702:, which already has an associated 738:Template:WikiProject United States 614:the Non-tropical storms task force 417:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Mexico 14: 2701:"Significant Earthquake Database" 1532:World Meteorological Organization 1417:The discussion above is closed. 921:commons:Category:Winter Storm Uri 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 2578:The discussion above is closed. 820: 780: 675: 665: 634: 495: 485: 458: 384: 374: 353: 285: 264: 233: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3115:Top-importance Weather articles 2469:, in addition to winter storms 1904:Requested move 20 February 2021 1166:Requested move 16 February 2021 755:This article has been rated as 589:This article has been rated as 437:This article has been rated as 332:This article has been rated as 295:WikiProject Disaster management 3100:Mid-importance Mexico articles 2994:Hurricane Ian#Damage estimates 2425:Part 1. Overall damage/effects 1964:Okay, given the discussion at 1: 3175:Top-importance Texas articles 2544:18:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC) 2522:10:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC) 2497:06:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC) 2096:02:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 2076:18:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 2061:15:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 2045:14:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 2015:06:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC) 1993:05:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC) 1978:04:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC) 1959:04:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC) 1898:17:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 1880:14:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 1860:2021 Texas Electricity Crisis 1855:23:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 1834:05:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 1756:02:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 1735:01:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC) 1720:04:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 1692:16:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 1672:09:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 1656:04:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 1640:00:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 1613:00:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 1594:18:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC) 1576:14:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC) 1544:17:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC) 1518:20:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1498:20:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1477:02:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC) 1459:20:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1432:20:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1409:19:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1386:18:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1369:18:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1348:17:20, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1326:16:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1301:16:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1268:16:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1244:15:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1209:20:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 1160:22:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 1132:18:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 1113:06:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 1077:05:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 1062:01:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 1031:23:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 1017:22:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 1002:18:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 981:17:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 937:15:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 904:06:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 876:16:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 833:This article is supported by 793:This article is supported by 611:This article is supported by 411:and see a list of open tasks. 306:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 3135:WikiProject Weather articles 3110:Start-Class Weather articles 3065:23:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC) 3034:20:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC) 3006:20:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC) 2982:20:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC) 2964:19:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC) 2945:19:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC) 2904:22:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2885:01:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2869:01:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2852:02:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2839:01:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2825:01:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2811:01:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2796:00:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2758:00:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2730:08:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC) 2564:20:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC) 2443:01:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2409:20:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 2374:01:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2346:00:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2328:00:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2284:02:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC) 2261:00:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2240:19:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC) 2216:07:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC) 2177:04:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC) 2163:04:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC) 1483:Weather Channel storm naming 572:Template:WikiProject Weather 318:Disaster management articles 3105:WikiProject Mexico articles 3095:Start-Class Mexico articles 2221:Strongly oppose any mergers 1581:Move discussion in progress 960:17:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC) 420:Template:WikiProject Mexico 3201: 3180:WikiProject Texas articles 3170:Start-Class Texas articles 2651:"Station: hastings 4N, NE" 2414:Comment: Article structure 2129:23:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC) 1935:at least one other article 1628:indiscriminate information 761:project's importance scale 595:project's importance scale 443:project's importance scale 338:project's importance scale 2696:List of disasters by cost 2676:"Station: Shreveport, LA" 1818:Ice accretion total maps. 816: 796:WikiProject Massachusetts 776: 754: 691:WikiProject United States 660: 610: 588: 480: 436: 369: 331: 280: 259: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2748:but not acknowledged. 2594:I check pages listed in 2580:Please do not modify it. 2307:I agree with Mario that 2138:Please do not modify it. 1704:Category:Energy in Texas 1419:Please do not modify it. 1180:Please do not modify it. 696:United States of America 514:, which collaborates on 2614:Reference named "NCEI": 2587:Orphaned references in 2483:2021 Texas power crisis 2459:" happened. Listed on 1927:article naming criteria 2901:User talk:FlyDragon792 2746:Talk:Hurricane Katrina 2621:Fayetteville, Arkansas 1779: 1194:Withdrawn by nominator 1089:2017 California floods 813: 773: 741:United States articles 607: 241:This article is rated 222: 75:avoid personal attacks 2671:Shreveport, Louisiana 1815:Burst pipes in Texas. 1777: 812: 772: 606: 245:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 220: 100:Neutral point of view 1999:the other RM instead 1708:Energy in California 1465:WP:OFFICIALNAMESONLY 788:Massachusetts portal 683:United States portal 105:No original research 2600:orphaned references 2081:Article Suggestions 1355:as per the article 709:Articles Requested! 511:WikiProject Weather 309:Disaster management 300:Disaster management 272:Disaster management 2646:Hastings, Nebraska 2139: 1929:, a title must be 1821:Power outage maps. 1780: 1391:Very Strong Oppose 814: 774: 608: 529:Articles Requested 400:WikiProject Mexico 247:content assessment 223: 86:dispute resolution 47: 3039:In that respect, 2859:just that source. 2735:Winter Storm Cost 2407: 2404:Alternate account 2385: 2384: 2137: 2031:comment added by 1949:. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ( 1787:comment added by 1775: 1761:Sea turtle rescue 962: 950:comment added by 855: 854: 851: 850: 847: 846: 836:WikiProject Texas 629: 628: 625: 624: 534:Project Resources 453: 452: 449: 448: 348: 347: 344: 343: 227: 226: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3192: 2882: 2849: 2822: 2750:RandomInfinity17 2727: 2716: 2714: 2712: 2691: 2689: 2687: 2666: 2664: 2662: 2641: 2639: 2637: 2575: 2519: 2511: 2440: 2401: 2370:lternate account 2360: 2343: 2324:lternate account 2292: 2281: 2273: 2258: 2206: 2203: 2200: 2174: 2160: 2047: 2021:Hey I live here! 1916: 1914:Winter Storm Uri 1851: 1845: 1804:Suggested images 1800: 1776: 1626:, without being 1624:encyclopediocity 1569: 1528: 1402: 1345: 1311: 1308:LightandDark2000 1291: 1288: 1285: 1222: 1220:Winter Storm Uri 1182: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1041: 918: 915:DachshundLover82 911:LightandDark2000 894: 891: 888: 868:DachshundLover82 861:Commons Category 830: 825: 824: 823: 790: 785: 784: 783: 743: 742: 739: 736: 733: 685: 680: 679: 678: 669: 662: 661: 656: 653: 638: 631: 577: 576: 575:Weather articles 573: 570: 567: 505: 500: 499: 489: 482: 481: 476: 473: 462: 455: 425: 424: 421: 418: 415: 394: 389: 388: 387: 378: 371: 370: 365: 357: 350: 320: 319: 316: 313: 310: 289: 282: 281: 276: 268: 261: 244: 238: 237: 229: 212: 210:19 February 2021 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3200: 3199: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3070: 3069: 2878: 2845: 2818: 2737: 2725: 2710: 2708: 2699: 2685: 2683: 2674: 2660: 2658: 2649: 2635: 2633: 2624: 2592: 2584: 2583: 2569: 2515: 2505: 2461:Weather of 2021 2436: 2386: 2354: 2339: 2313:Northern Plains 2297: 2277: 2267: 2254: 2237: 2204: 2201: 2198: 2170: 2156: 2142: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2108: 2103: 2083: 2026: 2023: 1912: 1906: 1862: 1849: 1841: 1826:142.120.100.241 1806: 1782: 1765: 1763: 1742: 1700:Energy in Texas 1601: 1583: 1565: 1554: 1522: 1485: 1425: 1398: 1341: 1305: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1218: 1178: 1168: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1035: 999: 968: 908: 892: 889: 886: 863: 826: 821: 819: 786: 781: 779: 757:High-importance 740: 737: 734: 731: 730: 729: 715:Become a Member 681: 676: 674: 655:High‑importance 654: 644: 574: 571: 568: 565: 564: 563: 539:Become a Member 501: 494: 474: 468: 423:Mexico articles 422: 419: 416: 413: 412: 390: 385: 383: 363: 334:High-importance 317: 314: 311: 308: 307: 275:High‑importance 274: 242: 221:Knowledge (XXG) 208: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3198: 3196: 3188: 3187: 3182: 3177: 3172: 3167: 3162: 3157: 3152: 3147: 3142: 3137: 3132: 3127: 3122: 3117: 3112: 3107: 3102: 3097: 3092: 3087: 3082: 3072: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2920: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2798: 2736: 2733: 2718: 2717: 2692: 2667: 2642: 2591: 2585: 2577: 2567: 2566: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2532:strong support 2525: 2524: 2500: 2499: 2446: 2445: 2432: 2429: 2426: 2423: 2419: 2418: 2411: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2357:Hurricane Noah 2349: 2348: 2331: 2330: 2299: 2298: 2295: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2264: 2263: 2243: 2242: 2233: 2218: 2180: 2179: 2143: 2134: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2102: 2099: 2082: 2079: 2064: 2063: 2053:Martinevans123 2033:Robert Beryman 2022: 2019: 2018: 2017: 1995: 1980: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1861: 1858: 1843:Master of Time 1823: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1813: 1805: 1802: 1762: 1759: 1741: 1738: 1723: 1722: 1695: 1694: 1675: 1674: 1643: 1642: 1600: 1597: 1582: 1579: 1553: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1461: 1447:WP:NOTCENSORED 1424: 1423: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1388: 1371: 1350: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1270: 1212: 1190: 1189: 1175:requested move 1169: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1124:Knowledgekid87 1116: 1115: 1069:Wikicanada1127 1038:Wikicanada1127 1023:Wikicanada1127 1009:Wikicanada1127 1005: 1004: 995: 973:Wikicanada1127 967: 964: 952:50.201.228.202 942: 941: 940: 939: 862: 859: 857: 853: 852: 849: 848: 845: 844: 841:Top-importance 832: 831: 815: 805: 804: 801:Low-importance 792: 791: 775: 765: 764: 753: 747: 746: 744: 728: 727: 722: 717: 712: 705: 703:Template Usage 699: 687: 686: 670: 658: 657: 639: 627: 626: 623: 622: 619:Top-importance 609: 599: 598: 591:Top-importance 587: 581: 580: 578: 562: 561: 556: 551: 546: 541: 536: 531: 525: 507: 506: 503:Weather portal 490: 478: 477: 475:Top‑importance 463: 451: 450: 447: 446: 439:Mid-importance 435: 429: 428: 426: 409:the discussion 396: 395: 379: 367: 366: 364:Mid‑importance 358: 346: 345: 342: 341: 330: 324: 323: 321: 304:the discussion 290: 278: 277: 269: 257: 256: 250: 239: 225: 224: 214: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3197: 3186: 3183: 3181: 3178: 3176: 3173: 3171: 3168: 3166: 3163: 3161: 3158: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3148: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3138: 3136: 3133: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3123: 3121: 3118: 3116: 3113: 3111: 3108: 3106: 3103: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3093: 3091: 3088: 3086: 3083: 3081: 3078: 3077: 3075: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2998:Elijahandskip 2995: 2990: 2989:Hurricane Ian 2985: 2984: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2974:47.19.209.230 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2956:47.19.209.230 2952: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2937:Elijahandskip 2934: 2928: 2924: 2921: 2918: 2914: 2913: 2911: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2902: 2899: 2895: 2890: 2886: 2883: 2881: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2857: 2853: 2850: 2848: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2831:Elijahandskip 2828: 2827: 2826: 2823: 2821: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2803:Elijahandskip 2799: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2788:Elijahandskip 2785: 2784:Hurricane Ian 2781: 2780:Hurricane Ian 2777: 2776: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2734: 2732: 2731: 2728: 2723: 2706: 2702: 2697: 2693: 2681: 2677: 2672: 2668: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2643: 2631: 2627: 2622: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2611: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2590: 2586: 2581: 2576: 2573: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556:69.118.232.58 2553: 2552: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536:Elijahandskip 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2523: 2520: 2518: 2509: 2508:Elijahandskip 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489:Elijahandskip 2486: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2453: 2452:Slight oppose 2448: 2447: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2420: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2405: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2387: 2375: 2371: 2369: 2364: 2358: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2347: 2344: 2342: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2329: 2325: 2323: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2294: 2293: 2285: 2282: 2280: 2271: 2266: 2265: 2262: 2259: 2257: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2241: 2236: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2222: 2219: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2161: 2159: 2152: 2148: 2141: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2100: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2080: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1938: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919:WP:COMMONNAME 1915: 1910: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1859: 1857: 1856: 1852: 1846: 1844: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1760: 1758: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1748:Victor Grigas 1746: 1739: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620:verifiability 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1598: 1596: 1595: 1592: 1588: 1580: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1570: 1568: 1563: 1559: 1551: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1443:WP:COMMONNAME 1440: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1430: 1422: 1420: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1396: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1309: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1278: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250:Strong oppose 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1188: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1170: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1090: 1086: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1039: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1003: 998: 993: 992: 991: 985: 984: 983: 982: 978: 974: 965: 963: 961: 957: 953: 949: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 916: 912: 907: 906: 905: 901: 897: 896: 895: 880: 879: 878: 877: 873: 869: 860: 858: 842: 839:(assessed as 838: 837: 829: 818: 811: 807: 806: 802: 799:(assessed as 798: 797: 789: 778: 771: 767: 766: 762: 758: 752: 749: 748: 745: 732:United States 726: 723: 721: 718: 716: 713: 711: 710: 706: 704: 701: 700: 697: 693: 692: 684: 673: 671: 668: 664: 663: 659: 652: 648: 647:Massachusetts 643: 642:United States 640: 637: 633: 620: 617:(assessed as 616: 615: 605: 601: 600: 596: 592: 586: 583: 582: 579: 560: 557: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 526: 524:for details. 523: 519: 518: 513: 512: 504: 498: 493: 491: 488: 484: 483: 479: 472: 467: 464: 461: 457: 444: 440: 434: 431: 430: 427: 410: 406: 402: 401: 393: 392:Mexico portal 382: 380: 377: 373: 372: 368: 362: 359: 356: 352: 339: 335: 329: 326: 325: 322: 305: 301: 297: 296: 291: 288: 284: 283: 279: 273: 270: 267: 263: 258: 254: 248: 240: 236: 231: 230: 219: 215: 211: 206: 205: 204: 198: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3057:69.119.89.11 3023: 2898:FlyDragon792 2893: 2879: 2846: 2819: 2738: 2719: 2709:. Retrieved 2704: 2684:. Retrieved 2679: 2659:. Retrieved 2654: 2634:. Retrieved 2629: 2613: 2612: 2607: 2593: 2579: 2568: 2531: 2516: 2456: 2451: 2449: 2437: 2413: 2390: 2367: 2340: 2321: 2312: 2304: 2296:Former !vote 2278: 2255: 2248: 2226: 2225: 2220: 2196: 2195: 2183: 2171: 2157: 2144: 2135: 2088:Amykuriakose 2084: 2065: 2027:— Preceding 2024: 1942: 1939: 1907: 1870: 1866: 1863: 1842: 1837: 1824: 1807: 1789:Victorgrigas 1783:— Preceding 1781: 1743: 1727:Camdoodlebop 1724: 1664:65.93.183.33 1644: 1605:Camdoodlebop 1602: 1584: 1566: 1555: 1505:MOS:BOLDLEAD 1486: 1438: 1426: 1418: 1416: 1399: 1390: 1373: 1361:68.43.231.88 1352: 1342: 1336: 1332: 1281: 1280: 1272: 1260: 1249: 1213: 1193: 1191: 1179: 1172: 1140: 1139: 1117: 1093: 1092: 1065: 1054: 1034: 1020: 1006: 988: 987: 969: 946:— Preceding 943: 884: 883: 864: 856: 834: 828:Texas portal 794: 756: 720:Project Talk 708: 689: 612: 590: 544:Project Talk 522:project page 515: 509: 471:Non-tropical 438: 398: 333: 293: 253:WikiProjects 201: 200: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3049:this source 3045:this source 3041:this source 2894:theoretical 2661:January 13, 2399:Destroyeraa 2337:northeast. 2270:MarioProtIV 2228:MarioProtIV 2127:• she/her) 2068:Djstriker91 1558:this source 1439:exceedingly 1277:common name 1185:move review 1044:MarioProtIV 990:MarioProtIV 243:Start-class 207:section on 203:In the news 148:free images 31:not a forum 3074:Categories 3026:Jason Rees 2861:Jason Rees 2769:Jason Rees 2686:August 19, 2463:, we have 2450:Comment - 2117:canvassing 2113:ANI report 1985:BlindmanJr 1536:Jason Rees 549:Assessment 2722:AnomieBOT 2467:cold wave 2363:Destroyer 2317:Destroyer 2003:Elliot321 1808:Include: 1525:Doyna Yar 1490:Doyna Yar 1488:articles. 1314:Elliot321 1254:ChessEric 1232:Elliot321 1197:Elliot321 1048:ChessEric 925:Elliot321 197:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2636:June 21, 2457:actually 2249:Comment: 2235:contribs 2205:Dark2000 2107:DISPUTED 2041:contribs 2029:unsigned 2011:contribs 1890:Burritok 1797:contribs 1785:unsigned 1684:Burritok 1648:Burritok 1591:RMCD bot 1556:I found 1429:Reywas92 1378:Vida0007 1322:contribs 1290:Dark2000 1264:contribs 1240:contribs 1228:commonly 1225:somewhat 1205:contribs 1149:Dark2000 1102:Dark2000 1058:contribs 997:contribs 948:unsigned 933:contribs 893:Dark2000 866:Commons. 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2534:!vote. 2391:support 1983:cents. 1974:say hi! 1955:say hi! 1712:Featous 1636:say hi! 1514:say hi! 1473:say hi! 1455:say hi! 759:on the 593:on the 566:Weather 554:A-Class 517:weather 466:Weather 441:on the 336:on the 199:in the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2930:total. 2765:source 2711:20 May 2422:Mexico 2101:Merger 1552:Deaths 1374:Oppose 1353:Oppose 1337:Oppose 1333:Oppose 1273:Oppose 725:Alerts 559:Alerts 414:Mexico 405:Mexico 361:Mexico 249:scale. 126:Google 2926:2022. 2917:WP:RS 2694:From 2669:From 2644:From 2619:From 2475:Viola 2199:Light 1284:Light 1143:Light 1096:Light 887:Light 651:Texas 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3061:talk 3053:This 3047:and 3030:talk 3002:talk 2978:talk 2960:talk 2941:talk 2880:Noah 2865:talk 2847:Noah 2835:talk 2820:Noah 2807:talk 2792:talk 2773:talk 2754:talk 2713:2015 2688:2021 2663:2022 2638:2021 2608:this 2560:talk 2540:talk 2517:Noah 2493:talk 2473:and 2438:Noah 2341:Noah 2279:Noah 2256:Noah 2212:talk 2210:🌀 ( 2190:and 2172:Noah 2158:Noah 2147:here 2125:talk 2111:Per 2092:talk 2072:talk 2057:talk 2037:talk 2007:talk 1989:talk 1970:User 1951:User 1894:talk 1876:talk 1850:talk 1830:talk 1793:talk 1752:talk 1731:talk 1716:talk 1688:talk 1668:talk 1652:talk 1632:User 1622:and 1609:talk 1540:talk 1510:User 1494:talk 1469:User 1451:User 1382:talk 1365:talk 1343:Noah 1318:talk 1297:talk 1295:🌀 ( 1258:talk 1236:talk 1201:talk 1156:talk 1154:🌀 ( 1128:talk 1109:talk 1107:🌀 ( 1073:talk 1052:talk 1027:talk 1013:talk 977:talk 956:talk 929:talk 913:and 900:talk 898:🌀 ( 872:talk 751:High 328:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2673:: 2648:: 2623:: 2479:USD 2471:Uri 2465:"A 2202:and 2121:TNT 2119:. ~ 1710:.- 1574:🏅 1407:🏅 1287:and 1146:and 1099:and 1087:or 890:and 585:Top 433:Mid 176:TWL 3076:: 3063:) 3032:) 3004:) 2980:) 2962:) 2943:) 2867:) 2837:) 2809:) 2794:) 2775:) 2756:) 2703:. 2698:: 2678:. 2653:. 2628:. 2574:}} 2570:{{ 2562:) 2542:) 2495:) 2397:. 2372:) 2326:) 2315:. 2238:) 2232:(/ 2214:) 2094:) 2074:) 2059:) 2043:) 2039:• 2013:) 2009:| 2001:. 1991:) 1976:) 1957:) 1921:, 1911:→ 1896:) 1878:) 1853:) 1832:) 1799:) 1795:• 1754:) 1733:) 1718:) 1690:) 1670:) 1654:) 1638:) 1611:) 1572:🌀 1562:🌀 1542:) 1516:) 1496:) 1475:) 1457:) 1405:🌀 1395:🌀 1384:) 1367:) 1324:) 1320:| 1299:) 1266:) 1242:) 1238:| 1217:→ 1207:) 1203:| 1177:. 1158:) 1130:) 1111:) 1075:) 1060:) 1029:) 1015:) 1000:) 994:(/ 979:) 958:) 935:) 931:| 902:) 874:) 843:). 803:). 649:/ 645:: 621:). 469:: 156:) 54:; 3059:( 3028:( 3000:( 2976:( 2958:( 2939:( 2863:( 2833:( 2805:( 2790:( 2771:( 2752:( 2726:⚡ 2715:. 2690:. 2665:. 2640:. 2558:( 2538:( 2510:: 2506:@ 2491:( 2406:) 2402:( 2368:A 2365:( 2359:: 2355:@ 2322:A 2319:( 2272:: 2268:@ 2123:( 2090:( 2070:( 2055:( 2035:( 2005:( 1987:( 1972:/ 1953:/ 1892:( 1874:( 1847:( 1828:( 1791:( 1750:( 1729:( 1714:( 1686:( 1666:( 1650:( 1634:/ 1607:( 1538:( 1527:: 1523:@ 1512:/ 1508:( 1492:( 1471:/ 1453:/ 1380:( 1363:( 1316:( 1310:: 1306:@ 1261:· 1256:( 1234:( 1199:( 1126:( 1071:( 1055:· 1050:( 1040:: 1036:@ 1025:( 1011:( 975:( 954:( 927:( 917:: 909:@ 870:( 763:. 597:. 445:. 340:. 255:: 213:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index