Knowledge

Talk:Fenugreek

Source đź“ť

1065:
in foods, and drugs.com claims doses of up to 350mg/kg/day (several times higher than the recommended dose on commercial fenugreek supplements, 3,000-6,000mg per day) are safe. The wikipedia pages seems to be inferring from the sources that fenugreek is snake oil with no real benefit, which does seem to have been reflected in the old sources, however the revised sources strongly imply that fenugreek is safe, non-toxic at normal doses, and may have benefits that haven't been fully explored. In this sense the tone of the wikipedia article stands in contrast to the websites it's citing. Reading through the guidelines on medical citations you provided, it seems to me that the wikipedia article should not adopt such a tone if the sources themselves do not justify it.
306: 768: 747: 542: 237: 864: 466: 207: 297: 376: 778: 366: 339: 1064:
Thankyou for your attention on this matter, and your revisions have certainly improved the article. However it does still seem to reflect outdated sources and not the current versions of the citations. There is safe dosing information, both nih.gov and drugs.com say it's safe in amounts commonly used
1172:
which include 1) low quality of the included research, 2) vast heterogeneity of the data analyzed, 3) heterogeneity of the subjects having various disorders of metabolic syndrome, which is a complex of several subdiseases, and 4) extreme range of doses and durations used in the studies included (25
967:
I'm new to Knowledge, so I don't feel comfortable making an edit, but as far as the "900%" increase in breast milk production - the citation points to a dead link. The only relevant line on the breasfeeding.org site that it points to is this- "Options are herbal galactogogues such as fenugreek (no
1284:
I'm not sure on what grounds you've chosen to disregard that study (and I'm not sure why you think 7 years old is significant enough to mention, that's not even old). The scientific literature is even more convincing for the case that fenugreek can play a role in controlling blood sugar levels in
1033:
Limited clinical trial data suggest fenugreek extracts may have a role in the therapy of dyslipidemia, diabetes, and Parkinson disease; however, studies were limited and provided inconsistent dosing information, making it difficult to provide recommendations. Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and
1098:
is highlighted as a concern because the review's authors plainly explain the extensive weaknesses of studies included, such as by concluding "the low quality of the included papers, the vast amount of heterogeneity in the data, and research involving patients with various metabolic conditions;
1176:
These variations and limitations in study design and error control emphasize the overall variable, poor quality of dietary supplement and food studies of fenugreek or any dietary element. Reaching a conclusion for the article "that fenugreek could meaningfully " affect biomarkers of metabolic
992:
I review the citation to back up the claims of increased libido and to be honest I am not impressed... 2 of the references point toward newspaper article with 0 scitific values, 1 link points toward a studies that made the claim: a study of such poor quality should not even been considered in
1042:
The key word in the the Drugs.com quote is "limited", meaning - as that source and others cited in the Research section say - the quality and amount of clinical research have been absent from the literature due to various design errors in the trials. For Knowledge, this means there are no
1320:
You might not like the state of the scientific research in this area and claim that more research is needed to be more certain of the claims, but to flatly say there's no evidence supporting the claim that this substance could have benefits or effects on the human body is just plain
1141:
Source 4 specifies: "Several coumarin compounds have been identified in fenugreek seeds, as well as a number of alkaloids (eg, trigonelline, gentianine, carpaine), including the alkaloid hydroxyisoleucine, which is considered to stimulate insulin secretion." (The drugs.com source)
1173:
to 60000 mg/day and durations of dosing for 2 to 144 weeks). Not assessed or discussed are dietary and lifestyle factors impossible to control unless the subjects in the underlying studies were in a controlled environment (such as a hospital clinical trial unit).
1228:
If your argument is there other studies that were unable to show a correlation then you have to at the very least change the statement to it not being "no good evidence" but rather it is scientifically controversial as to whether it increases milk production.
1038:
Clearly more research has been done since 2020 when that webpage was originally cited and it is no longer true to say there is no evidence. At the very least the citation needs to be removed since it does not support the claim being cited.
436: 1232:
Fenugreek has also been shown to independently cause hormone changes in men as shown in other scientific studies (namely increased testosterone, measured directly in some and measured as increased performance in weight lifting).
1374: 310: 1184:
For the encyclopedia - which should be presenting clear facts supported by scientific consensus (not available for any review on fenugreek) - such limitations warrant the review not be included in the article.
1316:
This systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials found that fenugreek supplementation significantly reduced fasting blood glucose, insulin levels, and HOMA-IR in people with type 2
153: 1364: 474: 349: 1309:
This meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials showed that fenugreek supplementation significantly decreased fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance
1025:
I'm not an expert here, and it's clear you guys have been at this for a while, but the claim "there is no clinical evidence that fenugreek has therapeutic properties." is not reflected in the citation
1379: 1200:
The authors acknowledge the limitations of the study, but I think this should be included in the research section because it points to research being done and research which should be continued. --
691:
project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
1297:
This meta-analysis of 12 studies concluded that fenugreek significantly improved fasting blood glucose, 2-hour post-load glucose, and HbA1c in people with both prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.
1327: 1240: 876: 190: 705: 993:
Knowledge. And the last link points towards a reviews of studies about type 2 diabetes (the author of this paper also noted the very poor quality of all the studies on the matter)
670: 529: 1349: 1291:
This meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials found that fenugreek seeds significantly reduced fasting blood glucose, 2-hour post-load glucose, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
931:
The health claims make fenugreek look like magic potion. I don't have the time to track down the references but this page reads like a pamphlet in a naturopath's office.
1389: 426: 147: 198: 1394: 692: 699: 1223: 1303:
This systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 clinical trials found that fenugreek had a significant effect in reducing fasting blood glucose and HbA1c.
79: 1359: 1047:
sources to say anything about a "clinical" (meaning in use and recommended by reputable physicians and clinical organizations) or therapeutic effect.
402: 1384: 1404: 1369: 838: 828: 85: 1409: 975: 938: 552: 389: 344: 1078:
To wit - fenugreek used to be considered hokum, but upon further study it appears that there may be some truth to it's claims after all.
479: 1010: 804: 44: 1222:
Anyone who's taken a cursory look will not only see studies but meta analyses on fenugreek doing just that. One of many examples:
1331: 1244: 1399: 1354: 99: 30: 1236:
As it stands this article is written very contradictory to the general scientific understanding of the effects of fenugreek.
1177:
diseases is misleading and not a conclusion that any reputable clinical organization would state - see top of left pyramind,
104: 20: 74: 791: 752: 319: 168: 1224:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320315882_Effectiveness_of_fenugreek_as_a_galactagogue_A_network_meta-analysis
274: 135: 65: 1239:
I would have made some changes myself, but I'm on mobile and it's too much effort to add references on a smartphone
401:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
206: 185: 681: 278: 895: 217: 883: 194: 1270:. As it stands, the article is accurate according to mainstream clinical literature and scientific consensus. 1219:
It makes a few patently false claims like "there's no good evidence that fenugreek increases milk production"
979: 942: 1014: 109: 1266:
does not meet MEDRS), please provide it for review here. Use of fenugreek to treat any medical disorder is
997: 958: 129: 1151: 723: 325: 1169: 1095: 954: 125: 1147: 1099:
extrapolating of our findings to the general population should be with caution." In the review under
1006: 971: 934: 296: 1178: 1108: 1104: 282: 161: 55: 1122:
adequately explains the weak state of science and absence of effect by fenugreek on human health.
803:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
901: 222: 175: 70: 1001: 1205: 968:
controlled studies but generally recognized as safe)..." The previous commenter is correct.
575: 541: 51: 1267: 1255: 1103:, the authors explain the high degree of variability in studies included, all of which were 916: 897: 863: 677: 236: 219: 953:
The author cites references. Please refute them authoritatively or withdraw your objection.
1259: 1044: 245: 1215:
This article is currently very far from scientific literature on the effects of fenugreek
1146:
Helpful data to include, especially for further researching the potential side effects.
1114:
Studies like this are of dubious value in writing for the encyclopedia - I recommend we
767: 746: 1275: 1190: 1127: 1055: 634: 141: 1343: 783: 1201: 1118:
include it. Until we have higher quality research to report, the last paragraph of
600: 1168:
was justified because the review authors describe in the results and conclusions
660: 381: 773: 465: 371: 1271: 1186: 1123: 1119: 1051: 604: 24: 1026: 273:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 1306:
4. Zhu et al. (2021) - Published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine:
998:
https://www.sci.news/medicine/trigonelline-cognitive-function-12296.html
1107:
in design, i.e., in the category of low-quality evidence, according to
777: 375: 899: 800: 612: 221: 1262:
review in a reputable clinical journal (a 7 year old publication in
1294:
2. Gong et al. (2016) - Published in Journal of Ethnopharmacology:
796: 676:
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
656: 638: 608: 592: 588: 584: 398: 1335: 1279: 1248: 1208: 1194: 1155: 1131: 1059: 1018: 983: 962: 946: 664: 630: 596: 580: 394: 365: 338: 1375:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1288:
1. Neelakantan et al. (2014) - Published in Nutrition Journal:
902: 857: 290: 231: 223: 15: 1313:
5. Rafraf et al. (2022) - Published in Phytotherapy Research:
1300:
3. Dutta et al. (2017) - Published in Phytotherapy Research:
1002:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11357-023-00919-x
464: 1365:
Knowledge vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1165: 1091: 1048: 519: 514: 509: 504: 160: 1380:
C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
795:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 393:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1034:
cytotoxic properties have yet to be fully explored.
477:, a task force which is currently considered to be 447: 1101:3.1. Systematic review and study characteristics 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 910:This page has archives. Sections older than 174: 8: 1350:Knowledge articles that use British English 700:Category:Knowledge requested images of food 1004: 741: 492: 444: 333: 249:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 1027:https://www.drugs.com/npp/fenugreek.html 996:It's not a magic potion. See the recent 473:This article is within the scope of the 743: 335: 294: 1390:Mid-importance Food and drink articles 920:when more than 5 sections are present. 1170:the study's "significant limitations" 1161:Dubious effects on metabolic syndrome 281:, this should not be changed without 7: 789:This article is within the scope of 411:Knowledge:WikiProject Food and drink 387:This article is within the scope of 1395:WikiProject Food and drink articles 698:Provide photographs and images for 549:Here are some tasks you can do for 414:Template:WikiProject Food and drink 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 1328:2A00:5400:F006:A424:1:1:18C3:89FC 1241:2A00:5400:F006:A424:1:1:18C3:89FC 914:may be automatically archived by 1360:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 862: 776: 766: 745: 704:Consider joining this project's 540: 374: 364: 337: 304: 295: 235: 205: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1385:C-Class Food and drink articles 833:This article has been rated as 726:from the project's tasks pages. 669:Participate in project-related 431:This article has been rated as 1405:High-importance plant articles 1370:C-Class level-5 vital articles 1137:Hypoglycemia Risk - Mechanism? 689:{{WikiProject Food and drink}} 324:It is of interest to multiple 1: 1209:13:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC) 1087:Whether to cite a weak review 807:and see a list of open tasks. 405:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1195:17:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 1132:02:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 1019:15:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 963:15:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 947:03:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 813:Knowledge:WikiProject Plants 1410:WikiProject Plants articles 1049:Updates and revisions here. 816:Template:WikiProject Plants 475:Herbs abd spices Task Force 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1426: 839:project's importance scale 553:WikiProject Food and drink 527:To edit this page, select 437:project's importance scale 390:WikiProject Food and drink 1336:15:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC) 1280:18:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC) 1249:12:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC) 1031:What it actually says is 984:00:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 927:Exaggerated health claims 832: 761: 496:Food and Drink task list: 491: 472: 443: 430: 359: 332: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1156:20:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC) 1060:00:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC) 684:to learn how to do this. 417:Food and drink articles 1400:C-Class plant articles 1355:C-Class vital articles 1258:national guideline or 722:Note: These lists are 647:articles currently at 621:articles currently at 569:Status or below up to 469: 75:avoid personal attacks 1285:people with diabetes: 1264:Phytotherapy Research 706:Assessment task force 468: 311:level-5 vital article 199:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 1120:the research section 671:deletion discussions 279:relevant style guide 275:varieties of English 105:No original research 565:articles currently 448:Related taskforces: 277:. According to the 792:WikiProject Plants 682:WP:Handling trivia 576:Agaricus bisporus 470: 320:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1021: 1009:comment added by 1000:, original paper 974:comment added by 937:comment added by 924: 923: 889: 888: 853: 852: 849: 848: 845: 844: 740: 739: 736: 735: 732: 731: 719: 718: 579:(i.e. mushroom), 561:Help bring these 487: 486: 289: 288: 230: 229: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1417: 1096:this 2022 review 986: 949: 919: 903: 880: 879: 866: 858: 821: 820: 817: 814: 811: 786: 781: 780: 770: 763: 762: 757: 749: 742: 727: 544: 536: 535: 493: 455: 445: 419: 418: 415: 412: 409: 384: 379: 378: 368: 361: 360: 355: 352: 350:Herbs and Spices 341: 334: 317: 308: 307: 300: 299: 291: 242:This article is 239: 232: 224: 210: 209: 200: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1340: 1339: 1217: 1163: 1139: 1089: 969: 932: 929: 915: 904: 898: 871: 835:High-importance 818: 815: 812: 809: 808: 782: 775: 756:High‑importance 755: 728: 721: 715: 712:in this section 645:High Importance 545: 524: 453: 416: 413: 410: 407: 406: 380: 373: 353: 347: 318:on Knowledge's 315: 305: 283:broad consensus 246:British English 226: 225: 220: 197: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1423: 1421: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1397: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1362: 1357: 1352: 1342: 1341: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1286: 1254:If you have a 1216: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1162: 1159: 1145: 1138: 1135: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1036: 1029: 990: 989: 988: 987: 976:108.14.103.108 939:71.237.182.219 928: 925: 922: 921: 909: 906: 905: 900: 896: 894: 891: 890: 887: 886: 873: 872: 867: 861: 855: 851: 850: 847: 846: 843: 842: 831: 825: 824: 822: 819:plant articles 805:the discussion 788: 787: 771: 759: 758: 750: 738: 737: 734: 733: 730: 729: 720: 717: 716: 714: 713: 702: 696: 685: 674: 667: 641: 635:French cuisine 619:Top Importance 615: 563:Top Importance 558: 547: 546: 539: 534: 533: 523: 522: 517: 512: 507: 501: 498: 497: 489: 488: 485: 484: 471: 461: 460: 458: 456: 450: 449: 441: 440: 433:Mid-importance 429: 423: 422: 420: 408:Food and drink 403:the discussion 386: 385: 369: 357: 356: 354:Mid‑importance 345:Food and drink 342: 330: 329: 323: 301: 287: 286: 240: 228: 227: 218: 216: 215: 212: 211: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1422: 1411: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1396: 1393: 1391: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1347: 1345: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1319: 1315: 1312: 1308: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1220: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1182: 1180: 1174: 1171: 1167: 1160: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1143: 1136: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1112: 1110: 1106: 1105:observational 1102: 1097: 1093: 1086: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1041: 1040: 1037: 1035: 1030: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1003: 999: 994: 985: 981: 977: 973: 966: 965: 964: 960: 956: 952: 951: 950: 948: 944: 940: 936: 926: 918: 913: 908: 907: 893: 892: 885: 882: 881: 878: 875: 874: 870: 865: 860: 859: 856: 840: 836: 830: 827: 826: 823: 806: 802: 798: 794: 793: 785: 784:Plants portal 779: 774: 772: 769: 765: 764: 760: 754: 751: 748: 744: 725: 711: 710:project ideas 707: 703: 701: 697: 694: 690: 686: 683: 679: 675: 672: 668: 666: 662: 658: 654: 651:status up to 650: 646: 642: 640: 636: 632: 628: 625:status up to 624: 620: 616: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 577: 572: 568: 564: 560: 559: 556: 555: 554: 548: 543: 538: 537: 532: 531: 526: 525: 521: 518: 516: 513: 511: 508: 506: 503: 502: 500: 499: 495: 494: 490: 482: 481: 476: 467: 463: 462: 459: 457: 452: 451: 446: 442: 438: 434: 428: 425: 424: 421: 404: 400: 396: 392: 391: 383: 377: 372: 370: 367: 363: 362: 358: 351: 346: 343: 340: 336: 331: 327: 321: 313: 312: 302: 298: 293: 292: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 247: 241: 238: 234: 233: 214: 213: 208: 204: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1326: 1263: 1238: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1221: 1218: 1183: 1179:WP:MEDASSESS 1175: 1164: 1144: 1140: 1115: 1113: 1109:WP:MEDASSESS 1100: 1090: 1032: 1011:68.46.21.155 1005:— Preceding 995: 991: 970:— Preceding 930: 911: 868: 854: 834: 790: 709: 688: 652: 648: 644: 643:Bring these 626: 622: 618: 617:Bring these 601:Ham and eggs 574: 570: 566: 562: 551: 550: 528: 478: 432: 388: 326:WikiProjects 309: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 243: 202: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1166:This revert 1094:concerning 955:Enstardavid 933:—Preceding 917:ClueBot III 724:transcluded 708:. List any 693:select here 661:Burger King 382:Food portal 244:written in 148:free images 31:not a forum 1344:Categories 1310:(HOMA-IR). 1148:Bromallium 1317:diabetes. 1268:WP:FRINGE 1256:WP:MEDORG 1092:This edit 884:Archive 1 678:WP:Trivia 605:Soy sauce 573:status: 314:is rated 255:travelled 88:if needed 71:Be polite 25:Fenugreek 21:talk page 1260:WP:MEDRS 1202:Ben Best 1045:WP:MEDRS 1007:unsigned 972:unsigned 935:unsigned 912:300 days 869:Archives 687:Add the 655:status: 629:status: 480:inactive 267:artefact 203:300 days 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 837:on the 510:history 435:on the 316:C-class 271:analyse 263:defence 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1321:false. 810:Plants 801:botany 797:plants 753:Plants 613:Yogurt 322:scale. 259:centre 251:colour 126:Google 877:Index 657:Apple 639:Sugar 609:Sushi 593:Drink 589:Curry 585:Bread 520:purge 515:watch 399:drink 303:This 191:Index 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1332:talk 1276:talk 1272:Zefr 1245:talk 1206:Talk 1191:talk 1187:Zefr 1152:talk 1128:talk 1124:Zefr 1056:talk 1052:Zefr 1015:talk 980:talk 959:talk 943:talk 829:High 799:and 680:and 665:Fish 631:Beer 597:Food 581:Beef 530:here 505:edit 397:and 395:food 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1181:. 1116:not 1111:. 427:Mid 176:TWL 1346:: 1334:) 1278:) 1247:) 1193:) 1154:) 1130:) 1058:) 1017:) 982:) 961:) 945:) 663:, 659:, 653:FA 649:GA 637:, 633:, 627:FA 623:GA 611:, 607:, 603:, 599:, 595:, 591:, 587:, 583:, 571:GA 557:: 454:/ 348:: 269:, 265:, 261:, 257:, 253:, 201:: 193:, 156:) 54:; 1330:( 1274:( 1243:( 1204:: 1189:( 1150:( 1126:( 1054:( 1013:( 978:( 957:( 941:( 841:. 695:. 673:. 567:B 483:. 439:. 328:. 285:. 195:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Fenugreek
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
Index
1


British English
varieties of English

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑