Talk:Final Crisis - Knowledge

984:

has been subdued after he was stopped from killing Mary Marvel by Freddy Freeman in evil form because he say a "leering old man" (Desaad) in her eyes. Checkmate hasn't fallen yet and it is discovered they have some sort of manufactured superheroes that look like Buddy Blank that look like bodies compacted in concrete (don't ask), all of them. The President of the US is in a bunker with his advisors and they are telling him that they are almost compromised. The President has a gun in his hands and by the way he talks and acts, it seems like he is going to blow his brains out if the bunker is compromised, but that is speculation. Darkseid at the end is reciting a chant and all of the humans infected are repeating what he is saying as the sky is opening up and Simyan, Goode, and Mokkari die. Hal Jordan is declared innocent after exposing Granny Goodness in Kraken's body trying to siphon off Oa's power batter to make her Darkseid's favorite after causing so much mayhem, but she injures a Guardian first. The Guardians agree to send a force to Earth and give Hal 24 hours to get results. Calculator is getting his ass romped because Libra thinks he is a traitor. At the same time, Lex Luthor is given the rear guard and is being a smart ass, until Doctor Sivana tries to stifle him, because, well Dr. Sivana really is a worthless villain who needs to be killed off. Mister Miracle is not dead due to an "Impact Proof" suit, as well as he is telling all heroes present with him to paint their face in a style similar to Metron's in the first issue. That is the facts in no particular order. If anyone deletes this, I have it saved on a word file and I'll just keep reposting it here. If it keeps getting deleted here, I will move it up to the article and I am pretty sure none of you nitpickers wants something as unpolished as this to be progressed to the main article. So lets at least try to put even a "ghettoed out" plot of issues in here and maybe, just maybe one of you will polish it up and post it on the main article. And I'm not trying to say anything, but if you losers who nitpicked about the plot had just put a plot in, we wouldn't have to deal with my terrible summary, so go suck a fat one. I will organize it tomorrow and maybe it can be used.

731:

understand what's going on and no one person will catch everything Grant Morrison puts into it. During the early issues of Final Crisis, I would check the Knowledge page after reading the comic to see if maybe I missed anything or to see if something I did not understand was explained. I must say the page was helpful. Unfortunately, I can't really learn anything from the page now. I continue to check after each issue, but there is barely any new information on the site. I understand the argument for leaving out the plot, but as an average user I would prefer a plot section. The Secret Invasion page is a perfect example. Sure the plot section is not extremely concise, but it covers every important topic and doesn't leave anything big out. I personally don't mind reading a little more if I will get a lot more out of the article. I also wanted to note that although we don't know what will happen at the end of the event, we can still explain what has been going on so far. Thanks for hearing me out!

684:, I'm not advocating violating either of those. However, more detail is needed to help explain the impact this crisis is having in the larger DCU. Dan Turpin becoming Darkseid, Mary Marvel fully crossing over to evil, Wonder Woman as the new leader of the female furies are all major developments that should be discussed. I can't understand the logic behind waiting until the series has ended to include these or other plot details, bcause if they're releveant at the end of the series they're relevant now. Finally, to the IP above, Wesley is free to believe whatever he wants and to express it civilly, but you are not free to make personal attacks against him. They do nothing to bolster any arguments, so do us all a favor and cut it out. 1165:

topic being brought up for no reason all the time. At least I don't get the reason. I thought the series is in universe. I can see the question of where in the timeline stuff is though, as that is confusing sometimes like a lot of the X-men Series', don't even get me started there sometimes. Even though I don't agree with being told to be "nice" because I think this whole plot discussion was stifled by politics, I'm sorry for being a dick about it. In my defense though, I think the reasons the plot was down was childish, but Mr. Animate did make the point that making people feel stupid or angry after they disagreed with me isn't fair either.

852:, which are pretty important guidelines which state that we should avoid in-universe plot outlines. This might be interpreted to imply we shouldn't have any plot but it is worth noting that when we look at the quality assessments these hopes need to be jumped through after GA as you drive on to FA class. So it could be argued that we can just rewrite this heavily when it comes to that (and there is no reason it can't go all the way) but it might be wise to aim to write it so it doesn't need to be completely rewritten. There is a way to have the story without writing it in an in-universe style though. I added one link 1333:(the guideline and the scale being arrived at by consensus and an awful lot of discussion). As this article will be an easy B once it stabilises then the next level to aim for is GA. An in-universe plot would have to be removed and/or completely re-written, so it makes sense to try and aim for that now as it means contributors aren't going to be writing a plot now that will have to be scrapped in a couple of months. The plot is probably over-detailed where it covers FC #6 and #7 and in-universe for the latter, but that is easier to fix then trying to wrangle the whole section. ( 1023:

issue series down to a paragraph. Here is what needs to be done: just give an issue by issue summary, that's all anyone wants. Seriously, if the admins are limiting people, that's fine and they could try to block a user like me but unfortunately for them I have a rotating IP address so I can just do what I want as long as I want and they can't do much about it except wake up everyday and delete it and then five minutes later see it reposted because I don't have to work a day in my life ever again thanks to the lottery so I can dedicate my attention to this if need be.

841:. The problem was that we were getting blow-by-blow retelling of the plot which was then compounded by each issue being broken down by issue leading to some pretty solid plot bloat. My suggestion was/is that it should be possible to have a brief plot outline (after all if you the plot then read the comics) but this just doesn't seem to work out with the section bloating up again and I assume editors thought it best to have none rather than so much it violates copyright. It should be possible to have some kind of compromise now we have 5 issues under our belt. 805:

just because you can play god on Knowledge's article doesn't mean you get to delete entire topics because of one insignificant detail, because that robs people other than ourselves and I love that you all have a bunch of complaints and whining but I don't see anyone fixing all the things you are all complaining about. Go ahead and delete this, I'll just keep reposting it every day until the plot section is back up and is longer than that piddling summary that's up. I will be nominating this article for deletion. -Timmyfitz161@yahoo.com

1551:. The key is to describe things as they happen and ignore the fictional rules of the fictional universe. Morrison's quotes don't add to the understanding of the plot; place that in the publication section, if need be. And primary references are completely unnecessary, as the primary references are the subject of the article itself. It's not something that needs a citation because you are drawing from the article subject itself. We need a 434: 680:

that we should wait until the mini-series is concluded feels like a cheap way to ensure that consumers buy the books and that they aren't spoiled. That's not our responsibility. Frankly your decision that all plot must be reserved until the end of the mini-series seems arbitrary and out of sync with every other ongoing series that has been written about. As to your links to the issue by issue break down and

306: 279: 248: 316: 911:

events in the book issue to issue so that no one is confused. It doesn't matter how big the page is, we don't have a space limitation here. So whoever wants to make a plot thread, go for it and save the text to your computer so if someone wants to try to delete it, just go on and put it up again. This has gone on long enough, so whoever has a plot summary, GO FOR IT. Yeah!!! (

1253:

minimal English language skills, and a healthy distinction from what is real and what is fantasy) what's the point of boringly, excruciatingly stating on and on that Iron Man is not real, or The Lord of The Rings is a work of fiction ? My point is : If the author begins the article disclaiming the source (comic book, novel, motion picture) why bother with the "reality" tone ?

746:

information on what is happening in the series? (This is an actual, not rhetorical question). During Batman RIP, there was a (quite thorough) plot summary. Why should this page be any different. I am really new at editing, so I am sorry if I am not familiar with any of the protocol regarding either the talk pages, or what goes into an article. Thanks for your understanding!

401: 219: 1000:

that provide detailed descriptions of books, movies, tv shows, events, etc. but there is a group of admins hovering around DC titles that want to remove any story related information, which in turn removes the desire for someone to want to look at these pages in the first place, and removes the desire for anyone to want to add information to this page.

1195:

have a great plot so maybe someone can look at that. It can be shortened, just not much. I think it is best to change the format of the plot in terms of the time line and subject point, as that can allow the paragraphs to be shortened as much as possible. Think of it this way, if you never read a DC comic, would this be helpful at all?

1585:

work." Primary references are important for satisfying the referencing criteria for the B-class assessment "all major points are appropriately cited." There is nothing wrong with primary sources as long as they aren't all an article relies on - which isn't the case here. So it is perfectly consistent with guidelines. (

657:

while it is ongoing, Secret Invasion. That page was near perfect towards the end. This page is more about the author and not the story, that makes no sense, why have an entire page dedicated to the author and not the plot of the story. Animate is 100% correct and Wesley you are 100% wrong. Get over yourself

1828:. I suppose it might be that the article has unique needs (although it looks like it'd be easy enough to move things around there), but I don't see why we need to overcomplicate the structure. Having the PH first followed by the plot (as it is here) is pretty much standard and seems to work just fine here. ( 1986:

that happens in this series that isn't brought up or explained in the current version. Things are listed out of order, and rather than informing the reader, it only serves to confuse. I suggest redoing and lengthening the summary, covering all the key details. It would be much longer, but it needs to

1698:

Which I consider vandalism and have reverted. Let's be clear what we are discussing - we are discussing *where* that material should be placed in the article, we are not discussing *removing* sourced commentary from the author in reliable sources about his writing decisions. If anyone thinks that the

1605:

I might've lied, whoever did the edit to the plot overnight made it better. No quotes please. I am confused though from the point of Batman shooting Darkseid to Darkseid dying. The process is confusing because a lot of things in there should be killing him. If you are a reader, you are confused.

1569:

The Users on this page just spent the last month coming to a consensus on the plot section Wesley and you gave no comment/objection on the talk page during that process. I'm not trying to attack you but why is it all that is going to be unilaterally changed to such a large degree with no concern for

1429:

Indeed - and we have to make sure we don't conflate two separate issues - the plot section can be as long as needed to provide a useful summary to the read *but* it should not be an in-universe summary, it should always describe events as an object of the narrative - *not* as if they really happened.

1164:

I have read on other pages that Libra was killed by Lex but it is not on the main page and I haven't read it, so if someone has read it, please list it. And whoever knows how to nominate anything for deletion, please do so to the "In Universe Style" section below, it is becoming bothersome with that

730:

I'm new to editing Knowledge pages, but I'm a long time comic book fan and I just wanted to give my opinion on the issue at hand. I feel there should be a plot section. I have been reading Final Crisis, but as anyone reading it knows, it is a very cryptic series. It certainly requires some thought to

679:

I'm certainly not advocating a long detailed plot, but right now the "Premise" section is plain awful. You're assertion that the article isn't a substitute for reading the comic books is technically correct, but we should provide a clear synopsis for someone who hasn't or won't read the books. Saying

1849:

I don't know if this is allowed, but I just pray this is the end of Darkseid, but god knows that some writer with no creativity will have to bring him back when they can't think of a plot haha. I know that they are going to somehow undo most of what was established with this series, but it would be

1387:

The tag on the section at the moment pretty much sums it up "Please edit the article to focus on discussing the work rather than merely reiterating the plot" - I don't technically have a problem with the plot section being longer (and there could be an argument for having more analysis on the middle

1022:

That is completely false. I knock both the admins and the users but I know for a fact the plot is being taken down by the users because the plot doesn't fit their image. I have noticed that users are trying more and more to prune the living shit out of these pages to the point of limiting a 4 to 9

1737:

Cameron, I didn't know you had put those quotes in the article, so now I understand why you took such offense to me deleting those quotes. I thought about it and if it was me I would have felt the same was you felt. No more taking cheap shots. Those quotes should be in a commentary or a separate

1584:

It is not treating the plot as a work of fiction - it is "reiterating the plot". Equally Morrison's quotes explain why he made a lot of the choices in the plot - putting it into the PH would basically result in going over the same ground twice and is clearly in line with the idea of "discussing the

1179:

Ok, plots done, its perfect, no need to keep shortening it everyday. Not angry, just saying. I don't want it to turn into the plot for Batman R.I.P. where you look at it and go "What the? Well that tells me nothing". It is good. And whoever did this final edit, nice. I am so happy a plot is up

1132:

Hey guys, just want to point out that the "Omega Effect" reference in the plot summary is incorrect; it should read Omega Sanction. Not trying to be anal, but as a question of both correctness AND consistency with the Batman and Darkseid entries it should be changed. It's not a question of a little

857:

which gives Morrison's own analysis and thinking behind the issue (kind of a director's commentary) and it should be possible to write the story from a more analytical perspective. Granted it is not such an easy task as retelling the plot but I think it is a worthwhile endeavour and would basically

581:

Edit warring is always bad, which is why I brought this here. I have to say that I strongly disagree with your statement Wesley. Just because you don't like the way the information is presented doesn't mean it has to be removed. Certain types of editors are always going to want to go overboard with

524:

The plot has been discussed above. The problem is there's a lot of users who don't read the talk page, and some users who liek to add every little detail every time a new issue comes out. The best solution is to leave out the plot summary entirely until the miniseries is finished, as it is a finite

1864:

There are always gonna be fans and writers who will want to bring back their favorite characters that were killed off (Didio has openly admitted he took his job to get Barry Allen back). The allure of Darkseid is that there is a near omnipotent being who commands a legion of followers who wish for

1252:

As an avid reader myself, from WWII articles to Dental Surgery, from car engineering to Spider-Man, I've always bumping with such argument : In-universe style. Most of the times, such authors start their articles stating it's about a comic book/movie etc. For the average reader (assuming they have

1194:

The plot is great. Someone said it can't be put in three paragraphs but I was looking at it and it can be put into three large paragraphs or even easier would be to do like they did for Final Crisis: Revelations and make seven small paragraphs. I don't know which is easier. On the DC Wikia they

999:

This article provides no useful information. Who cares who drew which comics? Most people want descriptions of the story. Admins are discouraging people from adding information, because they are removing information that people spent their time working on. There are plenty of articles on wikipedia

983:

Yeah I know. I am very happy that they archived all the stupid inane topics on this page. So here is what I got from FC #5, as I read it at Borders today. The Monitor they mindwiped in #1 has his powers and memory back due to him solving his Rubix Cube that he has been playing with. Black Adam

804:

I would suggest that you all stop being little nitpicky babies deleting every little thread that doesn't meet your anally retentive standards. Put a more thorough plot up, if something is incorrect or suspicious, list that in it. I know this is hard for you selfish individuals to comprehend, but

745:

I have to agree with Lantern 1025. I have been reading Final Crisis and all the tie-ins, but I am still quite new to comics. Therefore, I do not always get what is happening, and turn to Knowledge to fill in the details. What is the point of having a page on a comic book series, but not giving any

656:

Give a clear plot synopsis is NEVER COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. You have no idea what you are talking about. As a test i showed the page to my roommate and he has no idea what is going on. This is the worst page because of people like you Wesley. You want a perfect example of how a miniseries can look

603:

We're not obscuring information. We want to try and write about it in a clear, concise, and well-written manner. All we need to give is the set-up of the story for the general reader to graps everything else in the article, ie. the publishing background. We don't need to give in-depth detail about

2101:

There is nothing in the main Final Crisis miniseries to indicate that the US President seen as Superman in an alternate Earth is Obama. The mini-series was written before he was even officially nominated. If there is another storyline, official source, etc. identifying him as Obama, it should be

1078:

Thank you, whoever put a plot up. I've already saved the text so if it is deleted, I'll just repost it. And whoever deleted the plot in the first place, grow up. Look at all the stuff you started because you were feeling constipated that day. Whoever is putting that plot up, announce yourself

910:

If anyone wants to even put a issue by issue plot thread, go for it. At least it would be a plot. I am confident that among everyone in here, that discussion could be done here to edit the thread instead of someone deleting the entire Plot. Hell, even make a separate section to list connected

481:

I've noticed some back and forth on including a plot summary for this ongoing series. It's probably best to discuss it here and get a consnsus rather than continue to revert each other. I think the plot section is necessary despite the series not being finished. Plot sections are included in all

861:

Also there are others things that need doing if people are eager to contribute to the article - added some links to reviews (now moved to the talk page above) and this article needs an expanded reception section summarising/synthesising the reviews. This again is exactly the kind of thing a top

775:

Something I just don't understand is why Final Crisis is singled out by certain people to have no on-going plot? I haven't seen this in any of the on-going comic arcs lately. SI, Batman RIP, New Krypton, etc all had or have ongoing plot sections with none of the edit wars to stop any kind of

1101:

OK people, we have a plot up thanks to Vertebreakr. Now this is a open invitation. Let's just detail this as much as possible. It will be here forever and people now and in the future will want to get as filled in as possible, so fill it in. If you see something that is foggy or could use

1228:

Was this a decision made to avoid the flame wars that errupted all over the internet every time someone praised or derided the series? Morrison is a fairly polarizing writer, with both this and Batman: RIP getting HEAVILY mixed reviews (not sure mixed is even the right term... it was more

1358:

I don;t think the plot here is the least bit over-detailed. If there re objections that it does not meet other guidelines, then the guidelines need some adjustment for flexibility. If any substantial plot is removed, then it might well be objected to at FAR as not providing the necessary

1524:, which states: "Please edit the article to focus on discussing the work rather than merely reiterating the plot", when you did the opposite to that. There is no pre-requisite for having a plot of three paragraphs, the concerns are tone, in-universe style and adding too much detail. See: 1284:

Knowledge is both a fan site and encyclopedia, it is an encyclopedia developed by fans. I wouldn't say the page is lavish right now by any means, informative is the word. The beauty of wikipedia for all is that it is what the fans decide in the end really, and in that we all win.

1981:

The summary that's in the article right now covers some of basics, but it needs a lot of work. The miniseries had a lot more than that going on, so the summary that appears now doesn't accurately capture what happens. Summaries shouldn't generally be especially long, but there's a

1796:

I can't see anyone having a problem with using a similar format. As long as the plot remains streamlined, there shouldn't be a problem. Before the predictable uproar, by streamlined I mean all of the major plot points are hit and that they are done so in an organized fashion.

1891:

Is there any word on whether the various titles of "Final Crisis: Aftermath" being collected into a single volume? Or are they going to be singular issues to be collected separately? Just wanna know just in case, so there might me a heads up and edit the main page.

1865:

the destruction of Earth, but people use him as a crutch too much. At least we now have Lady Styx to replace him for that role, in the commentary for Week 31 during 52, Ken Giffen has admitted Styx was created just have a new character for the 'Cosmic Menace' role.

1738:

section thoygh. It would pretty much eliminate any complaints about the plot, so let's just move those quotes to a comentary section or such. Sidenote, how are we going to integrate the other subseries into this ever because they already have separate entries now?

1102:

explanation, add on it, no subtraction. This is a great start. As usual, I copied the text so if anyone wants to try deleting it, it'll be up 5 minutes later so don't bother. We all have a responsibility to everyone, no and forever, to fill this in. Holla

2106:. Similarly, any suggestion that Nubia might be Michelle Obama. It is worth noting, however, that the 2010 Audio Drama adaptation of Greg Cox's Final Crisis novelization by Graphic Audio casts an actor who impersonates Obama when playing the character. 948:

I just got a hold of a higher up to take a look at the article and the obvious problems with the inefficiency of anyone doing the plot. I thank wikipedia and their swift action. They already archived the other unimportant topics, wow, that's awesome.

705:

Also, might I point out that all of the various comic books, ongoing miniseries or concluded, linked to from this article have plot summaries. Some could use massive trimming, but none appear to be violating copyright law in my amateur estimation.

926:

For the love of God would someone stop this Jr. High School bickering and put up a damn plot summary!!! You all act as if you have some God given editorial mandate when all we all are, are fans of either the charactors or the writers etc...

1721:. In that article, the plot is in-universe with footnotes to specific issues. I think the quotes Cameron reinserted are really good, and, instead of just removing them, they should be incorporated into another (possibly new) section. 2053:

Can we have the reading order back? There's several other lists on the page, and it's one of the most useful. People reading this page are most likely to be reading the series or re-reading it, so it is a useful addition.

2074:

When I wrote into the article that the title "Final Crisis" is a metafictional reference to the final chapter of "Crisis on Infinite Earths" (Named "Final Crisis") it was removed. Was I wrong to assume this is a given?

604:

the storyline; in fact, that's strongly discouraged on Knowledge. The series is not complete, and it's pointless to to try and structure a plot sumamry when we don't know how it'll sit as a whole. See the discussion

865:

So that is what I'd recommend as the best way to expand the article and how to present the plot/story in an out-of-universe format which would set the article up nicely for a push on to higher quality assessments.

1268:

Because wikipedia is an attempt to develop an on-line encyclopaedia not a fan site? It's not like comics are singled out for this treatment, wikipedia is getting increasing "tight" on lavish in-universe detail.

153: 1087:) 17:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC) You're welcome. I just created a new wikipedia identity for me, as I had spent years editing some of my favorite pages without anyone asking me my name. I'll try to keep up. 616:

for how to approach plot summaries in fictional articles. Basically: keep it short and simple. The longer and more detailed it is, the more likely you are to verge on a copyright violation.

1050:

Please go over to batman rip and rollback to the versions that had useful information. There is a person over there that refuses to let any useful information to exist on that page. Thanks.

1699:

morrison material should not be in the article (note again for the slow of thinking: not *where*) - let's hear it and hear *why*, this useful content doesn't not improve the article. --

2379: 1914:

I'd assume that each limited series will be collected into a trade paperback. I'll be keeping an eye out and will update when I see anything, unless someone else beats me to it. (

482:

ongoing works that i've seen, from tv series to comic series. Do we now need to go remove every character history from comic book characters as all of their stories are ongoing?--

410: 289: 147: 1149:

I was the one who changed it back because I've watched it get changed more than once and was hoping my action would finally lead to some consensus. I'm glad it did.

1476:

But that's just the point: it cannot be properly done in three paragraphs. though it shouldbe concise, the implementation of "concise" depends on the circumstances.

2307: 2303: 2289: 2197: 2193: 2179: 1209:

Will do, but I think the key is to remove issue # references - isn't that standard? Oh, and can someone PLEASE get rid of the "plot summary is too long comment"?

339: 1027:

Or write an overview of the story in an out-of-universe manner as I mention above. If done properly it'd be difficult for other users to justify its removal. (

605: 229: 2001:

Looks fine to me - covers all the main points and doesn't get into inanities or fanboy level trivial information - if anything it can be trimmed shorter. --

345: 79: 349: 1987:

be if it's going to do an effective job of summarizing what happens. Improving the article should be more important than keeping the summary short.

1958: 2384: 2374: 391: 381: 1396:. As I say - it isn't a big issue as it is only two issues but if the whole section was like that then it would mean it'd need a lot more work. ( 2389: 1117:

You guys do know that Knowledge already automatically saves every version of the article since its creation? Simply click on the history tab.

790:

I would also suggest that no persuasive reason why FC should be treated any differently from other comic series in progress has been provided.

1455:

I'm currently trying to cut the plot summary down to projected goal of three paragraphs. Anyone who's read the series knows how hard this is.

1648:

Having been asked by Wesley to chip in, the plot summary should just describe what happens. Real world detail should go into other sections.

85: 2394: 2369: 1850:

nice if they did something with the vacuum established in this series and fill it with new blood. Just a comment. This series was great.

824: 44: 2145: 1555:

description of the plot in order to given general readers a comfortable context. Our real focus should be on other areas of the articles.

1607: 1230: 1210: 1103: 777: 664: 642: 582:

the details, whether or not the series is completed or ongoing. Our job as editors isn't to obscure information for convenince's sake,.

546: 510: 2107: 2082: 2035: 2016: 1962: 1899: 1872: 1058: 1007: 934: 1388:

issues in the series). At the moment the section starts off discussing the work and ends up retelling the plot, which falls afoul of

2285:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1134: 357: 2034:

What's the point of the "Sales" section if it only mentions issue 1 and is a sentence long? It doesn't seem to add to the article.

1626:

Speaking of plot stuff - I thought that Anthro was in the present in issue 5 - and that's where he is when he dies at the end. --

539:

That logic is so flawed, it is not even funny. Dont ruin this for everyone because you have no idea what you are talking about.

2275: 1133:

detail being missing; it's outright wrong. Edited it myself once, but it got edited back, and I'm not getting sucked into that.

99: 30: 1303:

Sort of - we've decided as a community that we don't write in an in-universe style - so that's the standard we apply here. --

104: 20: 1755:

em.. I put in one of those out of five? six? please don't misrepresent my motives - it's best to ask rather than project. --

2015:

It looks fine and it's a lot more clear than the Final Crisis graphic novel collection, that graphic novel has major holes.

168: 1154: 1122: 712: 690: 588: 488: 74: 135: 2350: 2240: 1667:

I can smell a cluster F coming from a mile away. This is going to bust out into an all out war. I am out of this one.

808:

You people are fucking stupid. Put the fucking plot synopsis up and quit ruining wikipedia with your stupid. - James.

329: 284: 259: 1939:

to come out, not when it did due to delays; therefore, I believe the tag in the infobox should be changed to Monthly.--

451: 190: 65: 185: 1359:

information and being uninformative and therefore unencyclopedic. Just adjusting the style, that's another matter.

561:

Wouldn't it be better to request semi-protection on the article, rather than continue to revert countless edits?

225: 2306:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2196:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

608:

about it; I know there's more that went on, but I'm having trouble finding it. Also, everyone should check out

461: 199: 1653: 1150: 1118: 569: 353: 828: 247: 129: 1611: 1107: 2341: 2267: 2231: 2137: 2020: 2006: 1903: 1876: 1786: 1760: 1704: 1631: 1435: 1308: 1274: 1234: 1214: 938: 795: 781: 668: 646: 550: 514: 109: 1138: 2111: 2086: 2039: 1966: 1944: 1855: 1743: 1686: 1672: 1290: 1200: 1185: 1170: 1084: 1062: 1011: 989: 954: 916: 765: 751: 125: 2325:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2313: 2215:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2203: 1961:, 'Monthly/Irregular'? I know it was supposed to be scheduled Monthly, but it did not come out on time. 1560: 1460: 1092: 736: 621: 530: 265: 2266:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2146:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070829071408/http://www.newsarama.com/Comic-Con_07/DC/countdownpanel.html

2136:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1851: 1739: 1682: 1668: 1286: 1258: 1196: 1181: 1166: 1080: 985: 950: 912: 1088: 732: 2170: 2078: 2060: 1992: 1895: 1868: 1813: 1809: 1575: 1571: 1054: 1003: 930: 660: 638: 542: 506: 218: 175: 1649: 1329:

is one of the guidelines that an article must conform to in order to pass the GA assessment in the

973: 564: 161: 55: 1330: 1254: 2002: 1782: 1778: 1756: 1718: 1700: 1627: 1548: 1431: 1304: 1270: 791: 467: 204: 70: 2310:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2200:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2056: 2326: 2216: 2149: 854: 760:

If nobody is going to add a plot section, will someone please at least explain the reason why?

1940: 1919: 1833: 1590: 1537: 1401: 1338: 1032: 899: 871: 761: 747: 717: 695: 593: 493: 51: 2276:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090218184239/http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=154379

1556: 1456: 617: 526: 463: 433: 201: 2333: 2223: 887: 883: 858:

be writing the section from the start with an eye to how it will be in a more stable form.

1988: 1825: 891: 141: 2292:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2182:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1547:

It's not any more in-universe than any high-quality FA film plot summary (for example,

1529: 1389: 1229:"Love/Hate"), after All-Star Superman received universally positive reviews previous. 969: 882:

Actually that isn't the "director's commentary" link I was thinking of. They are here:

845: 681: 609: 2332:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2222:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2363: 2279: 2103: 1525: 1518: 1483: 1393: 1366: 1326: 849: 613: 321: 2259: 2129: 1915: 1829: 1798: 1722: 1714: 1586: 1533: 1397: 1334: 1028: 895: 867: 707: 685: 583: 483: 24: 964:

What are you talking about? They might have cleaned up the talk page, but there's

2299: 2189: 819:). It doesn't need to be extensive or nitpicky, but for gosh sake, it has to be 2298:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2188:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 315: 311: 1079:

because I know me and a bunch of users are very thankful for your hard work.

305: 278: 1681:

I deleted anything quotes and anything that wasn't the plot from the plot.

811:

Come on people. This is really not smart at all. The article needs a plot,

1478: 1361: 862:

quality article needs and would certainly help move the article forward.

465: 203: 1048:

re: "...but unfortunately for them I have a rotating IP address...." -

400: 1781:

which is I think a format that we can all be happy on? (hopefully?) --

334: 2355: 2245: 2115: 2090: 2064: 2043: 2024: 2010: 1996: 1970: 1948: 1923: 1907: 1880: 1859: 1837: 1817: 1803: 1790: 1764: 1747: 1727: 1708: 1690: 1676: 1657: 1635: 1615: 1594: 1579: 1564: 1541: 1487: 1464: 1439: 1405: 1370: 1342: 1312: 1294: 1278: 1262: 1238: 1218: 1204: 1189: 1174: 1158: 1142: 1126: 1111: 1096: 1066: 1036: 1015: 993: 977: 958: 942: 920: 903: 875: 832: 799: 785: 769: 755: 740: 722: 700: 672: 650: 625: 598: 576: 554: 534: 518: 498: 1570:

anyone else's opinion that was a part of the recent development?

1713:

Perhaps the best approach is to construct this article like the

468: 427: 241: 213: 205: 15: 2155:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

2150:

http://www.newsarama.com/Comic-Con_07/DC/countdownpanel.html

399: 1777:

Yah or naw to re-organising the article along the lines of

333:, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to 2270:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2140:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

344:

If you would like to participate, you can help with the

2263: 2133: 1606:

If someone can clear it up there that would be great.

160: 815:, not whenever the series ends (which would be when? 2102:

cited; otherwise the reference should be removed as

2302:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2192:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1717:comic book articles. The only one I know of is the 968:. I would hardly call that reason for celebration. 2280:http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=154379 838: 776:mention of a plot. What makes FC so different? 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2288:This message was posted before February 2018. 2178:This message was posted before February 2018. 837:As some background see the discussion on this 2380:Start-Class Comics articles of Low-importance 174: 8: 823:! Come on, Knowledge is better than this!!! 245: 2258:I have just modified one external link on 2128:I have just modified one external link on 356:the attached article or discuss it at the 273: 224:This article was previously nominated for 1959:All Star Batman and Robin the Boy Wonder 503:I am in favor of having a plot section 1957:What about putting it like they did on 1331:Comics Project assessment quality scale 275: 1935:Schedule refers to when the comic was 1824:Sinestro Crops War doesn't conform to 844:However, we do need to keep an eye on 2167:to let others know (documentation at 7: 327:This article is within the scope of 2097:Obama as Superman Original Research 264:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 2262:. Please take a moment to review 2132:. Please take a moment to review 1503:Rewriting in an in-universe style 432: 314: 304: 277: 246: 217: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 386:This article has been rated as 2385:Start-Class DC Comics articles 2375:Low-importance Comics articles 2356:21:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC) 1239:13:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 2390:DC Comics work group articles 2065:00:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 2025:21:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1860:01:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 1219:06:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 786:17:04, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 756:03:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 741:22:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC) 723:03:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC) 701:03:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC) 673:16:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 651:07:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 626:08:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 599:06:57, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 577:19:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 555:19:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 535:06:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 519:03:50, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 499:01:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 408:This article is supported by 42:Put new text under old text. 2044:19:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 1838:21:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 1818:21:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1804:20:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1791:20:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1765:22:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1748:21:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1728:20:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1709:19:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1691:04:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1677:16:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1658:14:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1636:17:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1616:15:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1595:16:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1580:17:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1565:00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1542:00:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1488:04:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1465:00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1440:23:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1406:19:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1371:18:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1343:17:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1313:17:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1295:16:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1279:20:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 1263:07:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 1205:01:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 1190:16:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1175:03:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1159:23:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 1143:21:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 1127:16:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 1112:05:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 1097:14:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 1067:20:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 1037:02:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 1016:21:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 994:20:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 978:13:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 959:02:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 366:Knowledge:WikiProject Comics 2395:WikiProject Comics articles 2370:Start-Class Comics articles 2011:06:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 1997:22:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 1808:Yeah that would be great. 1509:Removing primary references 943:23:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 921:03:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 904:23:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 876:21:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 833:20:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 800:00:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 770:17:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 369:Template:WikiProject Comics 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2411: 2319:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2255:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2209:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2125:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1924:16:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 1908:06:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 1887:Aftermath being collected? 1881:09:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 392:project's importance scale 2246:23:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 2091:13:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC) 407: 385: 299: 272: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2116:18:21, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1977:Overhaul of Plot Summary 1971:17:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 1949:02:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 1845:Prayer for the aftermath 966:still no plot whatsoever 2251:External links modified 2121:External links modified 2070:No reference to "COIE"? 1224:No "reception" section? 1514:And then removing the 635:You are 100% correct 404: 254:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 403: 100:Neutral point of view 2300:regular verification 2190:regular verification 1500:You can't do so by: 1325:To further clarify: 817:nobody really knows! 411:DC Comics work group 105:No original research 2290:After February 2018 2180:After February 2018 2159:parameter below to 1931:Schedule: Irregular 1151:Zombie Hunter Smurf 1119:Zombie Hunter Smurf 358:project's talk page 2344:InternetArchiveBot 2295:InternetArchiveBot 2234:InternetArchiveBot 2185:InternetArchiveBot 1779:Sinestro Corps War 1719:Sinestro Corps War 1549:The Simpsons Movie 614:Knowledge:NOT#PLOT 405: 330:WikiProject Comics 260:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2320: 2210: 2081:comment added by 1898:comment added by 1871:comment added by 1506:Removing analysis 1245:In-universe style 1057:comment added by 1006:comment added by 933:comment added by 663:comment added by 641:comment added by 545:comment added by 509:comment added by 474: 473: 426: 425: 422: 421: 418: 417: 240: 239: 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2402: 2354: 2345: 2318: 2317: 2296: 2244: 2235: 2208: 2207: 2186: 2174: 2093: 2063: 1910: 1883: 1801: 1725: 1523: 1517: 1069: 1018: 945: 720: 715: 710: 698: 693: 688: 675: 653: 596: 591: 586: 574: 572: 567: 557: 521: 496: 491: 486: 469: 436: 428: 374: 373: 370: 367: 364: 324: 319: 318: 308: 301: 300: 295: 292: 281: 274: 257: 251: 250: 242: 228:. The result of 221: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2360: 2359: 2348: 2343: 2311: 2304:have permission 2294: 2268:this simple FaQ 2253: 2238: 2233: 2201: 2194:have permission 2184: 2168: 2138:this simple FaQ 2123: 2099: 2076: 2072: 2055: 2051: 2032: 1979: 1933: 1893: 1889: 1866: 1847: 1799: 1775: 1723: 1521: 1515: 1247: 1226: 1052: 1001: 928: 718: 713: 708: 696: 691: 686: 658: 636: 594: 589: 584: 570: 565: 563: 540: 504: 494: 489: 484: 479: 470: 464: 441: 372:Comics articles 371: 368: 365: 362: 361: 320: 313: 293: 287: 258:on Knowledge's 255: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2408: 2406: 2398: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2372: 2362: 2361: 2338: 2337: 2330: 2283: 2282: 2274:Added archive 2252: 2249: 2228: 2227: 2220: 2153: 2152: 2144:Added archive 2122: 2119: 2098: 2095: 2071: 2068: 2050: 2047: 2031: 2028: 1978: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1953: 1932: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1888: 1885: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1821: 1820: 1806: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1650:Alientraveller 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1620: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1582: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1298: 1297: 1267: 1246: 1243: 1225: 1222: 1162: 1161: 1130: 1129: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1041: 1040: 1020: 1019: 981: 980: 908: 907: 825:190.157.120.42 774: 728: 727: 726: 725: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 478: 475: 472: 471: 466: 462: 460: 457: 456: 447: 446: 443: 442: 437: 431: 424: 423: 420: 419: 416: 415: 406: 396: 395: 388:Low-importance 384: 378: 377: 375: 337:on Knowledge. 326: 325: 309: 297: 296: 294:Low‑importance 282: 270: 269: 263: 252: 238: 237: 230:the discussion 222: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2407: 2396: 2393: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2378: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2367: 2365: 2358: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2346: 2335: 2331: 2328: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2315: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2291: 2286: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2256: 2250: 2248: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2236: 2225: 2221: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2205: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2181: 2176: 2172: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2126: 2120: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2096: 2094: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2069: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2049:Reading Order 2048: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2029: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2003:Cameron Scott 1999: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1985: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1930: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1886: 1884: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1844: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1805: 1802: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1783:Cameron Scott 1780: 1772: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1757:Cameron Scott 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1729: 1726: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1701:Cameron Scott 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628:Cameron Scott 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608:98.27.166.148 1596: 1592: 1588: 1583: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1520: 1513: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1499: 1498: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432:Cameron Scott 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1305:Cameron Scott 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1271:Cameron Scott 1265: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1250: 1244: 1242: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1231:214.3.138.234 1223: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211:24.80.233.100 1207: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1180:and done!!!! 1177: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1104:98.27.190.112 1099: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 998: 997: 996: 995: 991: 987: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 962: 961: 960: 956: 952: 946: 944: 940: 936: 932: 924: 922: 918: 914: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 880: 879: 877: 873: 869: 863: 859: 856: 855: 851: 847: 842: 840: 835: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 809: 806: 802: 801: 797: 793: 792:Phil Sandifer 788: 787: 783: 779: 778:149.32.192.33 772: 771: 767: 763: 758: 757: 753: 749: 743: 742: 738: 734: 724: 721: 716: 711: 704: 703: 702: 699: 694: 689: 683: 678: 677: 676: 674: 670: 666: 665:207.190.62.62 662: 654: 652: 648: 644: 643:207.190.62.62 640: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 602: 601: 600: 597: 592: 587: 580: 579: 578: 575: 573: 568: 560: 559: 558: 556: 552: 548: 547:207.190.62.62 544: 537: 536: 532: 528: 522: 520: 516: 512: 511:207.190.62.62 508: 501: 500: 497: 492: 487: 476: 459: 458: 455: 453: 449: 448: 445: 444: 440: 435: 430: 429: 413: 412: 402: 398: 397: 393: 389: 383: 380: 379: 376: 359: 355: 351: 347: 346:current tasks 343: 341: 336: 332: 331: 323: 322:Comics portal 317: 312: 310: 307: 303: 302: 298: 291: 286: 283: 280: 276: 271: 267: 261: 253: 249: 244: 243: 235: 231: 227: 223: 220: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2342: 2339: 2314:source check 2293: 2287: 2284: 2260:Final Crisis 2257: 2254: 2232: 2229: 2204:source check 2183: 2177: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2154: 2130:Final Crisis 2127: 2124: 2108:68.146.78.43 2100: 2083:82.168.81.43 2073: 2052: 2036:129.139.1.68 2033: 2017:159.83.54.55 2014: 2000: 1983: 1980: 1963:72.237.4.150 1952: 1941:Marcus Brute 1936: 1934: 1900:99.153.85.84 1890: 1873:99.153.85.84 1863: 1852:Timmyfitz161 1848: 1776: 1740:Timmyfitz161 1736: 1683:Timmyfitz161 1680: 1669:Timmyfitz161 1666: 1619: 1604: 1552: 1477: 1454: 1360: 1287:Timmyfitz161 1266: 1251: 1248: 1227: 1208: 1197:Timmyfitz161 1193: 1182:Timmyfitz161 1178: 1167:Timmyfitz161 1163: 1131: 1100: 1081:Timmyfitz161 1076: 1059:148.107.3.20 1049: 1021: 1008:148.107.3.20 986:Timmyfitz161 982: 965: 951:Timmyfitz161 947: 935:24.61.76.201 925: 913:Timmyfitz161 909: 864: 860: 853: 843: 836: 820: 816: 812: 810: 807: 803: 789: 773: 762:Komodo ninja 759: 748:Komodo ninja 744: 729: 655: 634: 562: 538: 523: 502: 480: 450: 438: 409: 387: 350:notice board 348:, visit the 340:Get involved 338: 328: 266:WikiProjects 233: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 25:Final Crisis 19:This is the 2171:Sourcecheck 2077:—Preceding 1894:—Preceding 1867:—Preceding 1557:WesleyDodds 1457:WesleyDodds 1392:as well as 1249:Gentlemen, 1135:75.80.89.51 1089:Vertebreakr 1053:—Preceding 1002:—Preceding 929:—Preceding 733:Lantern1025 659:—Preceding 637:—Preceding 618:WesleyDodds 541:—Preceding 527:WesleyDodds 505:—Preceding 256:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 2364:Categories 2351:Report bug 2241:Report bug 1989:Friginator 1810:Vince92079 1773:Straw poll 1572:Vince92079 566:Hazardous 2334:this tool 2327:this tool 2224:this tool 2217:this tool 1937:scheduled 970:Kreachure 821:something 452:Archive 1 290:DC Comics 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2340:Cheers.— 2230:Cheers.— 2079:unsigned 1896:unsigned 1869:unsigned 1826:WP:CMC/X 1715:featured 1055:unsigned 1004:unsigned 931:unsigned 661:unsigned 639:unsigned 543:unsigned 525:series. 507:unsigned 439:Archives 226:deletion 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2264:my edit 2157:checked 2134:my edit 1916:Emperor 1830:Emperor 1800:AniMate 1724:AniMate 1587:Emperor 1534:Emperor 1530:WP:PLOT 1398:Emperor 1390:WP:PLOT 1335:Emperor 1255:Kapella 1029:Emperor 896:Emperor 868:Emperor 846:WP:PLOT 682:WP:PLOT 610:WP:PLOT 390:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2165:failed 2061:(Talk) 1526:WP:WAF 1394:WP:WAF 1327:WP:WAF 1241:Steve 850:WP:WAF 363:Comics 335:comics 285:Comics 262:scale. 234:Delete 126:Google 2057:Ziaix 2030:Sales 1553:basic 884:FC #1 839:above 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2161:true 2112:talk 2087:talk 2040:talk 2021:talk 2007:talk 1993:talk 1967:talk 1945:talk 1920:talk 1904:talk 1877:talk 1856:talk 1834:talk 1814:talk 1787:talk 1761:talk 1744:talk 1705:talk 1687:talk 1673:talk 1654:talk 1632:talk 1612:talk 1591:talk 1576:talk 1561:talk 1538:talk 1528:and 1519:plot 1484:talk 1461:talk 1436:talk 1402:talk 1367:talk 1339:talk 1309:talk 1291:talk 1275:talk 1259:talk 1235:talk 1215:talk 1201:talk 1186:talk 1171:talk 1155:talk 1139:talk 1123:talk 1108:talk 1093:talk 1085:talk 1063:talk 1033:talk 1012:talk 990:talk 974:talk 955:talk 939:talk 917:talk 900:talk 890:and 872:talk 848:and 829:talk 796:talk 782:talk 766:talk 752:talk 737:talk 719:Mate 697:Mate 669:talk 647:talk 622:talk 612:and 606:here 595:Mate 571:Matt 551:talk 531:talk 515:talk 495:Mate 477:Plot 354:edit 232:was 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2308:RfC 2278:to 2198:RfC 2175:). 2163:or 2148:to 1984:lot 1532:. ( 1479:DGG 1430:-- 1362:DGG 1145:DN 894:. ( 813:now 382:Low 176:TWL 2366:: 2321:. 2316:}} 2312:{{ 2211:. 2206:}} 2202:{{ 2173:}} 2169:{{ 2114:) 2104:OR 2089:) 2059:| 2042:) 2023:) 2009:) 1995:) 1969:) 1947:) 1922:) 1906:) 1879:) 1858:) 1836:) 1816:) 1789:) 1763:) 1746:) 1707:) 1689:) 1675:) 1656:) 1634:) 1614:) 1593:) 1578:) 1563:) 1544:) 1540:) 1522:}} 1516:{{ 1486:) 1463:) 1438:) 1404:) 1369:) 1341:) 1311:) 1293:) 1277:) 1269:-- 1261:) 1237:) 1217:) 1203:) 1188:) 1173:) 1157:) 1141:) 1125:) 1110:) 1095:) 1065:) 1035:) 1014:) 992:) 976:) 957:) 941:) 923:) 919:) 902:) 886:, 878:) 874:) 831:) 798:) 784:) 768:) 754:) 739:) 714:ni 692:ni 671:) 649:) 624:) 590:ni 553:) 533:) 517:) 490:ni 454:. 352:, 288:: 156:) 54:; 2353:) 2349:( 2336:. 2329:. 2243:) 2239:( 2226:. 2219:. 2110:( 2085:( 2038:( 2019:( 2005:( 1991:( 1965:( 1943:( 1926:) 1918:( 1902:( 1875:( 1854:( 1840:) 1832:( 1812:( 1785:( 1759:( 1742:( 1703:( 1685:( 1671:( 1652:( 1630:( 1610:( 1597:) 1589:( 1574:( 1559:( 1536:( 1482:( 1459:( 1434:( 1408:) 1400:( 1365:( 1345:) 1337:( 1307:( 1289:( 1273:( 1257:( 1233:( 1213:( 1199:( 1184:( 1169:( 1153:( 1137:( 1121:( 1106:( 1091:( 1083:( 1061:( 1039:) 1031:( 1010:( 988:( 972:( 953:( 937:( 915:( 906:) 898:( 892:3 888:2 870:( 866:( 827:( 794:( 780:( 764:( 750:( 735:( 709:A 687:A 667:( 645:( 620:( 585:A 549:( 529:( 513:( 485:A 414:. 394:. 360:. 342:! 268:: 236:. 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index