Talk:Fred Phelps/Archive 4

1690:

their opinion. All of the references that you cite can be worked into the article and they make your point. Yes, without all of the context of citation and reference the use of the category by itself out of context IS a violation of BLP. I noticed that you did not speak to the examples that I gave you. In one I pointed out that Robert Byrd was a member of the KKK and we all know that members of the KKK are racist so why don't we just create a category called racists and put Byrd in that category? You ignored that analogy because it is easier, obviously, just to list a bunch of examples of how Phelps is a homophobe, instead of explaining why using the racist category is bad but using the homophobe category is not. Once again, the point is not whether Phelps is a homophobe, he probably is. And if you want to work your extensive list into the article--as long as it is done in way that does not violate any of the Knowledge rules--then I state go ahead, but those examples do not provide the basis for using a category which by definition has no context to your express your personal opinion about Phelps.--

1396:

are even legitimate themselves, I will not repeat it. However, let's assume for the sake of argument that these sources are perfectly legitimate, verifiable, etc. The only wording that I can think of that would correctly fit the two sources are "One person has stated the Mr. Phelp's views and actions are so extreme that it may make people wonder whether he is actually a plant working to create sympathy for the anti-gay cause, and another person has speculated in an opinion column, without any facts to back up his speculation, that Mr. Phelps's organization is funded by NAMBLA." Since each opinion is independent and purely the individual speculation of two people who have no known expertise or special standing regarding the subject, they are no more weighty than the individual opinions of any other person. For this reason alone, even if the claim was true and could be proven,

1707:, "the case for the inclusion of a category must be made clear by the article text", and caution must be exercised in the use of a category that might be considered unpopular. However, I think that with some of the statements cited above (both from Phelps himself and gobs of reliable authors discussing him), the case for Phelps being a demonstrable and self-identified homophobe is unquestionably made, which fulfills the first criterion for addition of the category. The second one is fulfilled as well- the only reason Fred Phelps is discussed in public discourse at all is because of his campaigning against gay groups and those that disagree with him. I do not see how the sources provided by Christopher McKay go far beyond the standard outlined at BLP for categories. 1610:"Homophobia" as used in this context is obviously an attempt to label Phelps as a homophobe. Now, we as Wikipedians do not know if Phelps is a homophobe as such we can't just decide to slap that on the article (and only articles where the person has a conservative agenda). It is violates the principal of no Wikipedian commentary and since she is a living person is violates BLP. Where is the third party source? There isn't one, just the opinion of a Wikipedian. Now, she might just be a homophobe. I don't know, but neither did the Wikipedian who put her name in that category. How do we know what is in Phelps's heart? I don't claim that I know. Would you find it not a violation of BLP if I created a category called "Racists" and then put former 2058:(Edit conflict 2X) This really isn't the point. That guideline seems more apt and useful for sourcing purposes where the material is of dubious veracity - i.e. stopping people using hoax articles to source hoax material on WP. We're not using Phelps' sites(or any of his other material) to say that "god" does "hate fags", or anything of the sort. What we're doing is saying that "These are this man's opinions, and here is his website, from which a substantial amount of his notability derives". Linking to his site isn't supporting the position that he takes, it is merely providing the reader with the information required to draw their own conclusions. Surely it's better for the reader to see what this man writes and how ridiculous it is for themself? 2226:

serious trouble. So I suggest it may be wise to semi protect this article, and if they exist, articles relating to Australia's anti-discrimination laws. I dont think it will neccessarily be fred and his members vandalising, but I have seen that when laws such as Australia's law that go against the US ideal of free speach come up in the news, there tends to be a reaction of people thinking that we are going down a slippery slope. Sorry if this did not make much sense. In a nutshell, we may need to semi protect this article and some Australian law related articles in the near future. --02:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

2730:, but neigh few liberal Republicans. My point in sharing this is that the Democrats are by far the more open and inclusive of the two parties (they'll let just about anybody in; you can be for or against anything and believe in anything and still be a Dem), and that the United States is so conservative that even the more liberal of our two major parties can have some pretty extremist conservatives in it, but the Republican party can and does kick people out for not being conservative enough, or in some cases, for actually being too conservative (or for being on the wrong side of certain 1329:: I would question the using of this citation as the basis for the specific statement that "some speculate that Phelps is a plant aimed at giving the anti-gay movement a bad name." The article in question is hosted on what appears to be a massive news aggregater. This specific article has no author listed, nor any newspaper, magazine, or other primary publication source. The only type of citation it has is a logo for "AFP" which, when clicked, says it itself is a large syndicate of journalists, but still does not state where the article was originally published, nor who wrote it. 883:

world has witnessed what Fred Phelps, Sr. can and will do when he has perceived that he has been wronged or violated, if this incident truly happened, why didn't he take pictures of those mattresses to show the whole world what was happening in that park? Perhaps then with proof, some media attention would have occurred and we would have a RS to use, not a You Tube video which just cannot carry any valid weight in this context. Additionally, it's hard to believe Fred Phelps ever made a complaint and was ignored given what is documented in the past.

1295:

throwing things at the car’s windshields, but there was barely any damage; I would not consider it a "small riot." There were people screaming at the protestors and girls making out with each other in protest of the anti-gay slogans, but that was about it, not even close to a “riot.” In riots people are usually arrested, but no one was arrested. During the second protest there was no property damage because there was a lot of police, unlike the first time Phelps came, when there were barely any police. Just trying to clarify this statement. —

1131:

motivations of Fred Phelps, yet everyone continues to guess at them. This in turn makes the entire article riddled with POV. I propose stripping this article down to the bare minimum. When Phelps has passed on, historians will be more likely to ascertain his impact on world culture; specifically in the United States. As it stands now, nobody knows whether he is a religious zealot, grandstander, nut-case, or any combination thereof. But people keep on guessing, and I simply don't believe that makes for a very good encyclopedia article. --

1721:

so" called Phelps "this and that" and all of that information is encyclopedic. However, using the categories by Wikipedians to call names is not kosher with BLP, no matter how bad we might want to do it. It would not be appropriate to call Byrd a racist in the category section and it is not appropriate to call Phelps a homophobe in the category section. (By the way, the category is "homophobia" it is NOT "homophobe" and Phelps even for all of the things he is, is NOT a "homophobia".)

2097:(Edit conflict) Dunno what you mean by 'link love', if it's search engine rankings you're worried about, wikipedia external links don't affect these. It's not about love, though, it's about censorship - "I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it". I think the man is abhorrent and an imbecile. I can't let this affect how I edit the article, though. Removing the link would be, for example, like removing the link to 2468: 31: 372:"An investigation was launched by the City of Topeka and the Topeka Sheriff's department in 1996. It was determined that Chief Beavers had been allowing Phelps and WBC protesters to commit crimes without arrest, and that Phelps and WBC members had taken advantage of their knowledge of the policy by becoming more abusive towards Topeka citizens; in following years, Topeka citizens formed a loose 1116:

the pleasure of the neighbours or how he played cornet in the school band but later switched to bass horn is completely unnecessary and colours the section to sound more like a memoir than a biography. I think this section should be stripped down to include only relevant details about his early life to ensure that the article maintains a neural point-of-view.

1562:. I'm doing some category housecleaning as there are currently more persons in the categories than on the list, and there were a few on the list who weren't in the cat. I had thought the cite had already been placed in this article back when we verified him. I think there are multiple news articles that reference Eagle Scout and we just used the one. -- 1711:

on his article. The issue is, though, there is just not that much documented stuff about him- to the best of my knowledge, Byrd doesn't run a website to the effect of "GODHATES(racial pejorative).COM". It's not a perfect parallel, you see, because of the amount of scrutiny that each has been subjected to and the amound of reliable reporting done. --

1665:. It is evident Fred Phelps discriminates and advocates discrimination against homosexuals; it is not an opinion. The category factually represents Fred Phelps and I can't see how it is in any way a violation of BLP. I think the category should be restored because it is not "Wikipedian commentary," but a know fact, supported by third-party sources: 1346:: I'm honestly not sure whether this statement is more, or less obviously inappropriate. The statement itself says that this is the opinion of one author, in a single column. The column is in an online-only newspaper, and is simply an opinion article called "Critic-At-Arms" - in essence indistinguishable from a blog. The second paragraph of 2006:: "Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any". These sites are also an invaluable resource and provide context for the reader. In any case, it is surely a mistake to censor these links - better to let the reader click through to them and leave Phelps hoist by his own petard. 2833:

believe that he is one since he perverts the message of the Bible to the extent that it resembles some sort of hate filled doctrine of evil, In the same way some Muslims pervert the message of the Koran) he is not capable of rational thought in any sense of the word, When he dies (Preferably painfully, Hopefully in a similar manner to

1789:, and other similar categories. Some people view homophobia as something negative, while others don’t view it as negative; however, it does not matter how people interpret the category because it is a neutral term that does not state Phelps supports or opposes, but rather states he his involved in the issue of homophobia. — 2900:

Is there any source (on the Net or not) that gives any explanation as to WHY Phelps is so fixated on homosexuality as the foundation of his church? Was he raped? Was he in love with a woman who turned out to be a lesbian? Does he have a psychological aversion to musical theater? All kidding aside, it

2806:

Is there any information or speculation regarding his sanity, because I'm not a qualified psychiatrist but the guy is clearly a socially functioning loon. So strange that such an aspect of someones insanity finds aceptabillity within a group so estranged from all rational thought. How can a person be

917:

As we have said, the video itself is not reliable. No names of people being interviewed, hell, no information on who made the video. I could easily fake a video like that about my own town park, it would not make it true. Find us these letters, find us a confirmable, reliable source. This is actually

513:

Fortunately, people who edit this article are, for the most part, relatively sensible. For this reason, I have so far avoided modifying it, even to correct spelling mistakes, as the temptation to replace its entire contents with the phrase: "This man is an utter cunt," would be far too overwhelming.

383:

recalling abuse they had suffered from Westboro members during this period, which included threats of sexual assault to women and children; some claimed that they had caught members of Westboro going through their garbage looking for personal information to use against them. Following the findings of

2955:

I think that the financial angle needs to be greatly expanded in this article. There is one reference to the point that Phelps at one point could make a profit by taunting people into attacking him, but now clearly there should be more money flowing in from media appearances. If people could unite

2832:

He is clearly not sound in mind, Adolf Hitler appears rational and rather intelligent in comparison, His intense and burning hatred for anything and anyone outside of his cult probably proves that he is completely irrational, deluded and downright nuts, He gives Christians a bad name (I don't really

2389:

In the United States, individuals self-align with a political party, usually through voter registration. People involved directly with the party such as caucus-members, party leaders, etc. can be expelled from their positions, but a party cannot force the unregistration of an individual. Likewise, a

1758:

The BLP guidelines do not prohibit the addition of any information that could be construed as negative, rather they are a safeguard to prevent Knowledge from being used to defame people. The above two criteria are very solidly met with the links Mr. McKay provided- the ones I looked at were all from

1710:

As far as your mentioning of Robert Byrd- it stands to reason that because he was in the KKK, that he was a racist. If there's the depth and breadth of information on his racism that there is on Phelps' homophobia, it would be perfectly reasonable even under BLP standards to include a category on it

1400:

specifically states that this statment does not belong: "If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Knowledge (except perhaps in some ancillary article) regardless of whether it is true or not; and regardless of whether you can prove it or not."

1373:

The request looks fine, but this page isn't fully protected so it doesn't need admin help to edit. Any username four days old can edit this article. If no-one contests the removal by then, you should feel free to remove the claims you dispute. If they do contest the removal, you will need to discuss

1059:

Well given that members of Phelp's own Westboro Baptist Church are on here editing, why would you expect it to be easy to keep it unbiased? I see no problem with labelling Bob Jones University as fundamentalist. How else would you describe it? It is suggestive that this is not some normal person who

882:

Unfortunately, since these mattresses which "could be found lying all over the wooded area" were not witnessed by anyone else, pictures were not taken of them and Fred Phelps, it is claimed, complained and was ignored, you have no RS on which to base your claim. One must wonder, especially since the

2313:

They're not coming anymore, apparently Heath's family won't tell them where the funeral is *shock*. They've got a press release on one of their sites begging his family to tell them where his funeral, as Heath would have ( according to their PR) wanted them to come and bother his family and friends

2120:

Ok, I thought it was assumed they were bio links anyway since they were in the biobox - misunderstood you and thought you were trying to excise the biolinks purely on the grounds that you thought there should be no links from WP to that site at all. Still, I'd probably defend their existence in the

1950:

I removed the links to Fred Phelp's websites because they are not suitable for references, nor are they neutral. They are all attack sites and contribute nothing to the article and would only serve to further his /their vanity. Bottom line, they don't belong in this article. While I agree, we all

1867:

I don't think it would be noteworthy to cite the gay rights groups' denunciations, since it is pretty obvious that they'll have no use for Phelps and his cult. However, since Phelps claims to be Christian, I do think it would be worthwhile to have a list of Christian responses/denunciations in the

1641:

I understand the general point of this thread. To my knowledge, he has never publicly said the specific words "I am an avowed, card-carrying homophobe. I’m proud of it and I would be honored for Knowledge to label me as such.” However, he has said almost everything short of that. His statements

1336:

Since there is no way short of doing an exhaustive search everything Mr. Potok has ever written, or contacting the person directly, to determine the legitimacy of this statement, and considering that this is a living person, I feel this statement should be immediately deleted unless a more concrete

1231:

I think (OR/POV) Theroux was trying to establish whether Phelps counted the 4 dissenting children as his, and Phelps saw this and tried to avoid answering either way. In any case, I don't consider that the documentary presented any credible evidence loss of faculties (though that doesn't mean that

1115:

I feel that the childhood section of this article is biased in favour of Phelps. It is littered with unsourced statements that were obviously added by either Phelps himself or someone else who knows him well such as his family/cult members. The information on how his mother used to play piano for

751:

The end of the opening of this article states that in addition to his standard hate speech and anti-gay propaganda we all have come to expect from Phelps, that his speech is "violence-inspiring". This needs to be cited, as it is essentially accusing him of breaking the law rather than just being an

221:

Wonderful job, whoever. AtH aside, this was still one of the most thoroughly and wonderfully sourced articles on Wiki. Now I see it filled with tags and missing sources. More than a small part of me believes that one or more Westboro members "infiltrated" Wiki, and the rest of you dosey-doed right

2110:

As TechBear rightfully pointed out, these aren't even external links, they're bio links, and as such a fair argument could be made that they should stay, and I have no problems with that. As far as your censorship claim goes, I agree that freedom of speech should be defended to the end, but after

2022:

I agree with No more bongos. The sites are in no sense attack sites per the linked policy- they are admittedly very unpleasent links, but I think that they serve to illustrate the article and the behavior of the article's subject. There's certainly no policy against providing material pertinent to

1720:

Once again, I don't doubt the homophobia displayed by Phelps, once again, I repeat, that is not the issue. The issue is whether BLP allows us Wikipedian to label and it doesn't. BLP allows us quote third parties and as I pointed out above Christopher has provided tons of examples of where "so and

1395:

Since there was never any actual opposition to the above, and now that I am able to, I have removed the "Legitimacy" section, moving the statement from his son to the criticism section. I have removed the "plant" allegation completely. Since I have already made my point about whether the sources

1324:

My main contention, however, is with the paragraph beginning "ecause his activism has provoked opposition..." and contends the Phelps may be a plant. This caught my attention, because this is the first time that I have ever heard this claim, so I decided to look into the sources, since to me this

1253:

states: "In 2004, when a pro-homosexual Cuban refugee announced plans to travel to Cuba, Phelps sent another letter to Castro "warning" him of the man's plans and requesting travel visas for a group of WBC congregants so that they could follow the refugee around Havana with signs bearing anti-U.S.

1227:

Upon watching the documentary, I felt that Fred did not have trouble answering how many children he had, but was merely expressing irritation at the question, indicating that anyone who had done basic research would know not only how many children he had, but how many were still in regular contact

1175:

I have to agree with Alex. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a news service or a celebrity gossip page. The article should be stripped down to basic facts which meet the standards of encyclopediac sources. This will make it easier to maintain a non point of view perspective. There are hundreds (at

1130:

It's my opinion that Phelps is simply TOO controversial a subject on whom to do an exhaustive encyclopedic biography of a living person. I believe that 99% of Wikipedians have their hearts in the right places, but I'm very dismayed at the constant changes in this piece. Nobody knows for sure the

893:

hahahaha, there is proof that he complained to the mayor. In a very nice letter he said what's going on in the park. Journalists filmed the gays in the park, one gay asked the jourrnalist if he could suck him. It was well known that it was frequented by gays. What a denier u r. Go watch the video.

126:

All of the information contained in the article about the prior Phelps connection with Al Gore is accurate. You need to keep in mind that at the time of the Phelps family's invovlement with Gore, the picketing had yet to start. However, the family was very controversial in Topeka and had already

2715:

My guess is that he's a Dem because he's an old white man from Mississippi, and that's how old white people from the South used to always vote (tradition, you know), but then again, Phelps made his fortune by representing mostly African-Americans in civil rights cases during the '50s and '60s, so

1644:

Here’s another thing Wikipedians aren’t supposed to do, but here goes. Delete this whole comment if you want to…. Until recently I lived near Topeka and I have personally seen Fred and his church in action several times. They are the most extreme, bizarre group I can imagine. If necessary, we

1195:

Would it be worth mentioning that most of the administration of the church has been taken over by Fred's daughter Shirley? In Louis Theroux's BBC2 documentary just screened, Fred did nothing but read out prewritten diatribe and seemed to have trouble answering how many children he had when asked.

993:

Phelps just announced that WBC will be picketing the Jerry Falwell funeral. The announcement certainly deserves mention in the article, as does possibly Phelps' accusations of 'Arminism' towards certain evangelists including Falwell. However, the likely surge in traffic caused by the incident may

2225:

yeah, we should also be prepaired for massive vandalism and such when (not if) he breaks Australia's anti-discrimination laws (assuming we even let him pass through customs, as letting someone through whoes intention is known that it will be to to break a law is pretty stupid) and gets into some

1689:

Christopher, you have given a ton of examples of why anyone with half a brain can see that Phelps is a homophobe. However, that is NOT the question. As I pointed out before and I am repeating here, it is clear that he is, but categories in Knowledge are NOT to be used by Wikipedians to express

1362:

Since this is my first attempt at an edit of anywhere near this scope and potential controversy, I have created an account, which is where I state why I am requesting this edit, to hopefully avoid accusations of POV, sock puppetry, etc. Also, I would appreciate any feedback from other editor or

1289:

In 2002 Blue Valley North High School held productions of The Laramie Project play. Westboro members made it known that they were coming to picket the school. To their surprise many students cut class to meet the picketers and a small riot ensued with a few instances of car vandalism. The school

769:

Why isn't the origin of the picketing mentionned? You should all watch the Hatemongers documentary. In the local park, where Fred would go with his grandson, a gay man lured the grandson into the woods. The park was frequented by gay men, mattresses could be found all over the wooded area of the

449:

Here is a fact about Margie Phelps ... In the mid-1990s she actually filed for divorce from Fred (a very short lived filing) and ended up being hauled off to a local psych ward of either Stormont Vail Regional Medical Center or St. Francis Hospital by her children, including Marge Phelps, in the

2087:

guidelines. Those guidelines would apply if the links were being used within an External Links section, ie as back-up resources which could be used to reference the article but which are not. That is not how the links are being included within the Fred Phelps article: rather than as references,

1998:

has nothing whatsoever to do with sites that are generally unpleasant and bigoted and attack groups of people. The (rejected) policy is: "websites outside Knowledge that are used to facilitate, promote, or encourage the harassment of individual Knowledge editors". This is certainly not relevant

1041:

Bob Jones University" (emphasis added). Is that important? I have significant disagreements with fundamentalists, but I don't see why it's important to characterize the university as fundamentalist here in this article. It doesn't seem unbiased. It seems as though yet another way to sneak a

197:

I think that encyclopedia articles are made more interesting with pictures. The picture with his granddaughter is useful because he does enlist all members of his family that he can in the cause, including the very young, so it communicates information. The picture of him as a child is somewhat

2688:

Are we sure that this guy is really a Dem? Except for the anti-military comments, he seems to align himself with almost all the stereotypical right-wing view points, albeit to the extreme. Has anyone ever considered that his attempts at running as a Democrat was a subversive tactic; Trying to

1332:

Further, this article attributes this statement to "Mark Potok, the director of the intelligence project at the Southern Poverty Law Center which tracks hate crimes. (ibid)" However, the quotes from Mr. Potok do not refer at all to this sentiment, and since there is absolutely no citation for

1294:

The first protest was because Blue Valley North allowed some Muslims to use the gym on weekends; there is no mention of this. The second protest was because of the Laramie Project play. During the first protest the students of BVN knocked off a mirror of one of their cars and some people were

1033:

On the other hand, this article did not seem unbiased. Statements like "By Phelps's own admission, he never dated, and had no interest in members of the opposite sex." Is this relevant? Or only provided to give homosexuals peace of mind, so that they can think of Phelps as just a repressed

164:

I think the childhood picture of Fred can go. The picture of the granddaughter serves a purpose - it shows that he has enlisted young children into his campaigns. Interpretation of that is not appropriate for Knowledge, but it does say something important in a very simple, basic, factual way.

1545:

I wasn't so much questioning whether Phelps really was an Eagle Scout (my personal feelings on the matter are irrelevant, we are here to state the facts), I just wanted to make sure it was accurate. This is an article where POV claims with no evidence are put forwardby both sides, after all.

2851:

Everyone "perverts" the message of the Bible - that's because there are many, many messages in the Bible, often conflicting. Fred Phelps, just like anyone else, reads whatever he wants into it. If you were to follow the Bible to the word, you'd be schizophrenic because you'd constantly be

1863:"There is a request to cite that gay rights groups and christian denominations have denounced him. How many would you like? A google search turned up 30 or 40 I could have cited on the FIRST PAGE. (That is, original denouncements, not just journalisitc citations of the denouncements....)" 2582:

I also don't think it fits. He is also massively anti-military, which stereotypically is a left wing ideal (I say stereotypically because the basis in fact isn't really there). He fits some stereotypes for right, some for left, but in general is just an extremist of his own breed.

2873:

I would say at least... negative attention-seeking clinical narcissism and paranoia. Totally unencyclopedic, but fasinating. I also think he uses the intense hatred that they get back from everyone because of their horrid behavior to hold his cult/family members in the fold.

1325:

was a preposterous claim. This paragraph has two citations (69 and 70 on the main page, which I will attempt to reproduce here, though I am not the best with wiki coding. If anyone can link these better, please do so, with my gratitude), which I will address individually.

104:

I see no reason to keep the section about Phelps serving as a delegate for Al Gore in this article. The source for this information is an article that is definitely POV and even it only has a small quote from Phelps claiming to have been a delegate. Seems libelous to me.

1951:

have freedom of speech and even Mr. Phelps desrves his, we don't need the links to his websites. I'd say the same thing if an article for the Klan was here and a link to their site was present. Both are hate sites and serve only one purpose, to disparage their subject.

835:

A youtube video which does not name the people it is interviewing and is incredibly sparse on sources is not what I would call reliable. I could easily make a similar video about the Acton Arboretum, wouldn't make it true or a reliable source. This still sounds made up.

688:. Phelps himself says about his portrayal in the play: "They did not interview me, and portrayed me in a false light that amounts to defamatory misrepresentation." The play's authors state that all of Phelps' dialog in the play is taken verbatim from his own sermons. 1290:

later made tickets to the shows "buy ahead" in order to keep Westboro members from interrupting the play. Subsequently Phelps' website started declaring that "God Hates Blue Valley North" and proceeded to picket every year's graduation ceremony following the event.

2070:

I don't see how his personal sites reflect why he's notable any more than this wiki article or links to news articles about him. They are merely soap boxes for him to preach his hate from, I don't see what they add to the article, other than giving him more link

692:

I've searched for this and couldn't find any references except this article and text based off it. If someone has sources, please add it back. I currently don't see citations appearing soon so I'd prefer to remove it until someone can come up with something.

2901:

is one thing to be homophobic- it is quite another to be so obsessed with the issue of homosexuality that you attribute it to every possible evil imaginable. Are there any sources that we could incorporate that provide any explanation of his his pathology?

2152:

A user mentioned that several states have created and/or passed their own laws banning protests of military funerals near the end of the article. Could you please give citations for these so we can actually read the text of the legislation? Thank you.

2088:

citations or other resources, the links are included as part of the bio box, as examples of the views and positions which have made Phelps notable enough to have an article in the Knowledge. As such, they do not violate the external links guidelines.

2048:

Except that these links point to sites that Phelps and the WBC run. As such, they accurately reflect why Phelps is a notable figure, and thus they are properly presented in the article. That they are hate-filled and bigoted is ultimately irrelevant.

2111:

working for what is arguably one of the largest news forum sites in the world and seeing how absolutely horrible some of our users are, I also believe in the point that freedom of speech needs to be balanced by not tolerating bullies and bigots.

554:

Much of the Fred Phelps article could be moved to the WBC article. An alternative might be to create separate articles for the topics and have both WBC and Phelps articles with links to them. A separte Phelps Chartered page might also work.

774:, or something along those lines, of rape and pedophile nature. Fred, never looked for attention at that time, and was relatively 'nice', according to your standards. He was provoked. Too much hypocrisy and intolerance towards the Phelps. 476:

I am, again, removing Addicted to Hate references from this article. This has already been explained at length previously in this talk page, just scroll up and read it. Please try to stop adding this unreliable source to this article.

295:

Without good sources, and maybe even with good sources, WP would be sued from here to Timbuktu. Do you have any idea how many lawyers he has in his family? This guy is dangerous, REALLY dangerous, and he has to be treated with extreme

2237:

What a dickhead! I'm tempted to vandalise it myself, so semi-protection is probably a good idea. He was just on A Current Affair here claiming that Australia is the land of Sodom, is that enough to add Australia to his Most Hated

1354:

specifically refers to this sort of source, which should never be allowed in this context. Even if this was not a BLP, I would still question whether it would meet the "exceptional claim requires exceptional source" rule in

1095:

I agree that the line "By Phelps's own admission, he never dated, and had no interest in members of the opposite sex" seems a bit biased...this definitely needs a citation. If there is no citation, it should be removed.

2956:

to boycott any news outlet covering him, e.g. Current Affair mentioned here, unless it swore on a stack of bibles that they gave no money to anyone in any way connected with him... maybe he'd crumple up and blow away.

1077:

I have no doubt that they're editing the article (Hell, one of them added a few comments to an anti-Westboro video I uploaded on YouTube), but just for reference, can you point out what edits you suspect are theirs?

236:

I noticed that it mentioned that 90% of his congregation is related to him through either blood, marriage, or both. Is that suggesting that there has been intermarriage amongst family members of his congregation?

1763:

conflicts with the use of this category tag- please show me. To your last point, the category "homophobia" is appropriate, because it contains articles relating to the subject of homophobia, just as the article

2807:

commited for preaching about something like a pink elephant riding on the back of a mouse as a religion and this individual remains free in regard to the first amendment? Society has such a long way to go.

1654:

Getaway, I posted the same question on two articles because I didn't know if other editors on the Anita Bryant article would like to offer their input, as you removed 'Category:Homophobia' from that article

2390:

party cannot force a person holding elected office to resign as the office-holder holds office at the will of the people, not at the will of the party. So yes, things are bit different here than in Europe.

1485:

Because we cannot report rumors. Doing so may subject the WMF to a libel suit which it would lose. If you can provide reliable sources for that rumor, then the rumor can be written about. Go and actually

1642:

and actions demonstrate the most clear case of homophobia imaginable. If we can’t use an obvious description like this, we might as well just re-name Knowledge the “Page of links and direct quotations.”

2366:

Really ? I didn´t knew that ! Your country politics is really very different from in Europe. In Portugal, any of the main five political parties, can and sometimes certainly expels members, for several

1871:

I doubt that any legitimate Church or denomination in America considers Phelps and his so-called church to be a real Christian church. For example, Phelps calls himself a "Primitive Baptist," but the

1060:

just turned into a lunatic. It also implies that Phelps is just a slightly more extreme version of most fundamentalists, which I believe is quite accurate, given the kinds of statements one hears from

338:

recall an article on that being published in The Nation several years ago, but have had trouble finding it. If I could provide the cite, does anyone still remember what the uncited text said before?

127:

started the practice of digging through garbage of those people who oppossed then (literally) and so forth. The fact that Gore would connect himself with the Phelps at the time did raise eyebrows.

2276:

I'm from Topeka, KS and I work at a news station where he unfortunately visted the other night to spar with a news station in Sydney...here's the link..<object width="425" height="355": -->

1363:

admins on the manner in which I presented my case, and not just the actual content. Specifically, did I do anything wrong myself? Should I have added anything? Left anything out? Thanks.

606:

The movie, by K. Ryan Jones, Fall From Grace, on the life of Phelps and the various current controversies, was carried by the SHOWTIME cable channel network in December, 2007. HomeBuilding

2416:

Depending on the local laws, a person may even get a nomination in the name of a political party, even if the leadership and much of the membership of it has repudiated him/her, due to

1645:

could footnote almost every sentence of this article from entries in the Topeka and Lawrence newspapers and other sources. But Fred & WBC deserves more than a perfunctory entry.

241:

Bear in mind this could include marriage between second cousins, which is perfectly legal in the USA (I understand) and most other countries. The claim is not necessarily scandalous.

941:

Also i would like to add why has Knowledge Locked this subject, i think you should let people spam this one, let the hater get all the ranting he deserves!!!! Unlock this page!!!!!!

185:

I'll take the one out then. But it could be said that we are exploiting the granddaughter just like he is by showing her picture. Does the article need more than one picture anyway?

153:

Besides the article being about 10 times too long for the importance of this person, I wonder about the reason the picture of him as a child is included. Please let us know. Thanks.

2013:

If you can find a policy that supports censorship of links such as these, please do bring it to my attention. I will revert one more time, but will leave it to others after that.

740:

This needs to be updated HIGH PRIORITY The petetion is up to 35000 signatures to stop the WBC from protesting funerals related links should be added to: VT Massacre Cho Seung Hui

2541:

Can I mention that Fred Phelps is right wing extremist? All the activities he was doing is usually what a right wing pereson do (bashing homosexuals and minorities and such?).--

2061:

Most of all, though, without these links the article lacks important context, and contextual usefulness is a common-sense criteria when judging whether to include a link or not.

1228:

with Fred. Whether that irritation was justified can only be answered by those who were present during Louis Theroux's stays in Topeka. John Warburton 00:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

1209:

Only if you can find a reliable source which says that Shirley has taken over day-to-day management of the church. If you have a source for that statement, go for it.

2348:

I don't think they have the option of "expelling" him. If I register as a democrat, I am a member of that party, and they don't really have an option to remove me. --

401:

Phelps not listed in the USMA Register of Graduates and Former Cadets, a comprehensive source, nor is his participation in BSA documented in the text of the article.

2689:

sabotage the party from the inside, that sort of thing? Just throwing out theories here; because his membership in the party doesn't make any sense to me, at all.

1333:

sources in this article, it is not possible other than directly locating and contacting Mr. Potok, to determine if he ever said this, or what his reasoning once.

1753:

And that the subject's beliefs or sexual preferences are relevent to the subject's notable activities or public life, according to reliable published sources.

1559: 2121:

section at the bottom if they were there, purely for illustrative purposes. Nice to see this seems to be getting sorted out without any serious warring :)

1141:

Disagree with stripping this article down to bare minimum. He is one of the most controversial figures around today and deserves more detailed coverage.

1580: 1154:

Detailed coverage does not mean the same thing as posting opinions. Documented information or peer-reviewed critique are the key to preventing POV. See

1254:

and anti-homosexual slogans." Were the travel visas granted? And did they go? I believe it would be noteworthy to add such a mention to that section.

491:

I came across this article and expected it to be a contentious mess. I am really impressed with how well it's organized and how neutral it's written.

702: 1627:

Also, this discussion is also going on at the Anita Bryant article. Why can't this discussion be limited to one place??? Christopher Mann McKay?--

279:

Probably because there wasn't documentation. Especially in the case of living subjects, one must have a reliable source for a statement like that.

2635:

and respect varying POVs, as Ouroboros did. There have been some extremely military leftists in the past, and some anti-military conservatives. --

777: 429:

I am interested in knowing Phelps's wife's name and his marital history. If this information could be added to the article I would appreciate it.

366: 2333:

The Democratic Party haven´t tried to expel him yet ? He´s more stupid then stupidity itself and makes almost all extremists look like decent.

1321:

Just in general, the referenced section does not need to exist. Both main points could simply be incorporated into the "Criticism" section.

365:

I removed the following paragraph, as it accuses phelps and other wbc members of crimes without any sources for these claims. This violates

2902: 2881: 2787: 2187: 345: 307:

Do you know how impossible it would be to sue Knowledge? It's like trying to censor the internet; you can try, but it won't work for long.

1666: 846:

Would it be possible to put Pastor in quotes? He's technically not an official church pastor, and he doesn't represent any real religion.

2852:

contradicting yourself. It's just cobbled together from many different texts and generally is a mess. But that's neither here nor there..

1960:

cannot be used as a verifiable reference, used only to disparage their subjects and about as useful as placing someone's blog as a link.

2450: 2368: 2334: 2171:

That section already has citations for all of the named states that have passed laws to that effect. Is there something I overlooked? --

1823: 981: 664: 457: 271: 134: 112: 2853: 2822: 2606: 2299: 1920: 1842: 1271: 607: 2750: 2704: 2262: 2211: 1994:

They may be attack sites as you see them (and as I see them), but you appear to be citing a misinterpretation of a rejected policy.

1812:, I'm not quite sure how to add this, but it seems there should be more of a mention of his estranged children what happened etc 1785:

is not logical, as that would mean half of the articles in Category:Homophobia should be removed, as well as half the articles in

1431: 1872: 1155: 1909:

Will anyone please verify all of this alleged stuff from the Kansas preacher on the article, and why is Phelp's name on the

2931: 2837:) he's heading for hell, and I hope the rest of his cult are abused by protesters who were targeted by Phelps at his funeral- 909: 826: 789: 716:

Something shoudl be added about his attempt and announcement to try and protest as many of the funerals as possible. Thanks.

384:

the city and Sheriff's office, Beavers was asked to resign, and his successor immediately repealed the "no arrest" policy."

1576:

Ridiculously so, in my opinion. I'm going to dump it; if sources are available, please feel free to revert and cite them.

752:

outspoken bigot, since Freedom of Speech does not tend to apply to speech intended to cause violence. The current citation

1736: 923: 323:

One of his male children doesn't support him and may have publicly testified about childhood abuse. Look into it, people!

1747:

says that unpopular labels that fulfill these two criteria may be used even if the category is not considered positive:

698: 1910: 1790: 1681: 1601: 1519:, but there is no information or citation in the article to back that up. Can someone please provide some evidence? -- 1296: 1255: 1004:

Knowledge doesn't (usually) do preemptive page protections, however if the vandalism gets bad you can request it at

2528: 2523: 2518: 2506: 2501: 2496: 2475: 919: 811:

Yes, I do, go on Youtube and type hatemongers part 3, sounds like you're a little, umm, arrogant and close-minded.

207:

Erm, the fact that it's the only known existing photo of Phelps prior to becoming a preacher doesn't make it valid?

91: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 38: 438:

His wife is named Margie. It would be nice if someone would post the picture from the law firm site on this page.

755:, while I have not had time to read it thoroughly, does not even have the words "violence" or "violent" in it. -- 2672:, I have met several actual Nazi's and nothing they said was anywhere near as intense and extreme as Fag Phelps- 2186:

The site linked under "Defenses of Phelps" is a defense of the principle of free speech, not of Phelps's views.

1929:

It appears to be sourced - check the references. (I presume you're talking about the 'God Hates Ireland' stuff.

2906: 2885: 2791: 2588: 2546: 2353: 2191: 2084: 2032: 2003: 2916:

The documentary talks about Fred being a violent rage-a-holic father, but doesn't go much further than that.

349: 2454: 2338: 1884:

What does everyone else think? Should a list of Christian responses like that one be added to the article?

1819: 1678: 1468:

Hey, why the hell was the title redacted? I think it's a perfectly legitimate question, it's a strong rumor.

461: 138: 116: 2742: 2669: 2372: 2319: 2243: 1924: 1846: 1275: 977: 694: 668: 611: 501: 267: 2777:, etc. And yes, some conservatives (e.g. extreme isolationists) are anti-war, anti-military; some are even 2266: 2215: 1835:

On Oct. 31, 2007 Phelps' church ordered to pay 10.9 million, many times more than actual value of church.

1516: 2857: 2818: 2734: 2668:

He is so removed from reality that I don't believe left or right politics can really be applied to him or

2610: 2303: 1995: 1781:

is not to "call names," but is to describe Phelps is involved in the issue of homophobia. Your reasoning:

1435: 1313: 328: 2542: 2231: 955: 223: 208: 2838: 2700: 2673: 2007: 1815: 1786: 1200: 995: 973: 905: 847: 822: 785: 719: 574: 263: 884: 1326: 414: 2981:. This isn't necessarily the real reason behind the Westboro's beliefs, but it is at least what they 2919: 2877: 2810: 2692: 2642: 2427: 2295: 2258: 2160: 1916: 1838: 1783:"homophobia" it is NOT "homophobe" and Phelps even for all of the things he is, is NOT a "homophobia" 1724: 1427: 1403: 1364: 1048: 969: 897: 856:

All Knowledge regulations/guidelines/stipulations/etc aside, personally I'd love to see that happen.

814: 660: 453: 450:

immediate aftermath of her attempt to get away from Fred. The divorce petition was soon dismissed.

430: 402: 341: 259: 130: 108: 2942: 411: 2946: 2584: 2349: 2122: 2102: 2062: 2037:

Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research.

2014: 1930: 1778: 1590: 1547: 1520: 1475: 1159: 946: 927: 901: 837: 818: 802: 781: 756: 732: 2927: 2754: 2632: 2569: 2395: 2315: 2239: 2172: 2154: 2024: 1895: 1769: 1712: 1577: 1497: 1458: 1216: 639: 519: 286: 172: 1768:

is in the category "1930s", because the Great Depression is a subject pertinent to the 1930s. --

753: 2292:

Please keep in mind that most all of Kansas can't stand this guy and we're not all like this.

2039:

I think a hate speech site that makes ridiculous libelous statements falls into that category.

1424:

Should these allegations be restored into the article with caution and not taken as pure fact?

2990: 2814: 1732: 1027: 870: 685: 324: 186: 154: 2696: 2484: 1765: 1646: 1142: 930: 887: 850: 840: 793: 47: 17: 1676: 2973:

I think the "Hatemongers" movie explains it pretty well. Specifically, parts 3 and 4 from

2727: 2636: 2421: 2323: 2307: 2270: 2219: 1966: 1397: 677: 542: 478: 388: 1894:

Seems relevant to me to have a section on differing theologies (Christian or otherwise).

1777:

Getaway, I’m still not convinced, as I still see no BLP or other policy violation. Using

2289:" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355": --> 1939: 2723: 2227: 1563: 1530: 1233: 1197: 1132: 857: 492: 1672: 1668: 2961: 2923: 2766: 2722:(Also: there have been plenty of conservative Democrats over the years, just look at 2565: 2561: 2557: 2391: 2089: 2050: 1760: 1744: 1704: 1670: 1597: 1493: 1454: 1448: 1381: 1351: 1212: 1177: 1065: 1061: 1005: 635: 629: 545:

article, since the protests and targeting are done by the group, not only by Phelps?

515: 380: 373: 308: 281: 167: 1809: 1750:

That the subject publicly self-identifies with the belief or preference in question;

2986: 2746: 2738: 2417: 2112: 2072: 2040: 1982: 1913:

page? His detractors thought he was lying about Phelps, or the governor of Kansas.

1728: 1691: 1674: 1628: 1619: 1444: 1097: 1079: 866: 648: 590: 556: 505: 441: 416: 2286: 2278: 2205: 2449:

Is there any source that shows that his legal name or birth name is "Frederick"?

1759:

sources with editorial staff, and thus reliable. I do not see how the section of

1529:

I am afraid I can. I am working a list, fixing categories first, then cites. --

1343: 728:

That is in conjunction with the Westboro Baptist Church and is listed under such.

439: 2994: 2978: 2965: 2950: 2935: 2910: 2889: 2861: 2834: 2826: 2795: 2720:" theory, he must only make sense from the "inside" (of his mind & church). 2708: 2647: 2614: 2592: 2573: 2550: 2483:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2458: 2432: 2399: 2376: 2357: 2342: 2247: 2195: 2175: 2164: 2125: 2115: 2105: 2092: 2080:

So that our private conversation becomes part of the record for this article....

2075: 2065: 2053: 2043: 2027: 2017: 1985: 1973: 1933: 1898: 1888: 1885: 1850: 1793: 1772: 1715: 1694: 1684: 1649: 1631: 1622: 1615: 1604: 1566: 1550: 1533: 1523: 1501: 1478: 1462: 1411: 1386: 1367: 1356: 1299: 1279: 1265: 1250: 1236: 1220: 1203: 1180: 1162: 1145: 1135: 1120: 1100: 1082: 1072: 1012: 1009: 998: 958: 949: 874: 860: 805: 759: 735: 722: 706: 651: 643: 615: 593: 577: 559: 549: 546: 538: 534: 523: 508: 495: 481: 465: 444: 433: 419: 405: 391: 369:. Unless a source can be found for the following, it can't stay in the article: 353: 332: 311: 300: 290: 245: 226: 211: 202: 189: 176: 157: 142: 120: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

801:

Do you have a reliable source for any of that? Sounds a little, um, made up. --

1260: 1117: 1069: 770:

park. Fred made a complaint, nothing happened. Then gays protested with signs

297: 242: 199: 1956:

Bottom line, they're not encyclopedic, not useable as reference, not neutral,

1876: 2941:

Personally, I'd attribute it to him suppressing his own homosexual desires.

2778: 2717: 1981:

Agreed, these links have no business being cited from a Knowledge article.

1663: 2631:

1) He has run in Democratic primaries; not necessarily the same thing. 2)

1474:

Not sure why it was changed, but I have made a new, more neutral title. --

2957: 1377: 1176:

least) of other sites only a Google away which can provide juicier bits.

587: 2974: 2098: 1964:

if consensus states that they belong in, I'll leave it alone. Thanks !

625:

This article should make clear that Phelps is a viscious anti-semite:

256:

Why has all mention of Fred Phelps beating his children been removed?

2731: 2556:

If you can document it with direct references without violating the

588:

This seems to be the most comprehensive so I deleted the older links

160:

p.s. I don't think we need the picture of his granddaughter either.

918:

a Knowledge policy we are enforcing here, not being "deniers". See

2770: 2758: 2977:. I tried to explain this motivation in the first paragraph of 1600:? Can you be more specific, as I see no violation. Thank you. — 2774: 2462: 1618:

in the category? Of course, it would be a violation of BLP.--

1611: 1558:

I understand. Anons keep censoring him and a few others from

1042:

weasel attack against my fundamentalist brothers and sisters.

684:

Some of his ardent supporters claim that the play constitutes

25: 198:

chilling because he looks quite normal. I would keep both.--

2762: 2101:'s home page because you didn't believe in global warming. 1030:

of the enemy satan to make legitimate Christians look bad.

1878:

on Phelps quotes a real Primitive Baptist pastor saying,

2002:

Including these websites is specifically encouraged per

989:

Phelps vs. Falwell ... May want to go to full protection

1905:

What? How is Mr. Phelps, "anti-Irish" as an preacher...

1880:"That's certainly not an orderly Primitive Baptist...." 1861:

In one of the discussions above, Rick Boatright wrote,

1594: 2210:

I think this can be incorporated into the article. --

1347: 1596:

How is having homophia as a category in violation of

1703:

Just to speak up and voice my opinion: According to

1037:

Also, "In 1947, Phelps enrolled as a student at the

743:((User:Callida|Callida)) 10:49, 19 April 2007 (utc) 1660:

discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

1198:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/noise/?id=louis_theroux

945:

You just answered why it needs to remain locked. --

2605:He's a Democrat. Also, the left is anti-military. 1658:"Homophobia – irrational fear of, aversion to, or 1507:It says biographical material, not his talk page. 1810:http://www.plattsburghforpeace.com/familytree.htm 569:This should be rephrased; founding a law firm is 2283:<param name="wmode" value="transparent": --> 2206:http://www.kbsd6.com/Global/story.asp?S=7763918 583:Topeka Capital Journal has a new Phelps archive 2287:http://www.youtube.com/v/AMdpfjSyW_8&rel=1 2279:http://www.youtube.com/v/AMdpfjSyW_8&rel=1 1449:Knowledge's Biography of Living Persons policy 966:why does he need hating? He's making a point. 1045:Honesty in reporting, let the reader decide.- 410:He earned the rank of Eagle Scout with Palms. 397:Removed West Point and Eagle Scout categories 149:What is the purpose of the childhood picture? 8: 2896:Documentation of WHY Phelps feels as he does 1560:List of Eagle Scouts (Boy Scouts of America) 2255:Would he dare show his face in Australia! 1808:There is extensive information on this at 1873:Christian Action League of North Carolina 1804:Fred Phelps children, very small mention? 1034:homosexual? It doesn't seem relevant. 657:Anti-Semite?! Phelps is anti-everyone! 367:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 2481:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2035:under "Links normally to be avoided": 1572:Childhood section completely unsourced 535:Efforts to discourage funeral protests 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2004:Knowledge:External Links#What to link 926:, as you are really skirting that. -- 922:for more. I also suggest you look at 7: 2148:State Laws Banning Military Protests 1420:Unsourced allegations of Child abuse 472:Removing Addicted to Hate references 573:what this guy is most notable for. 413:Phelps wanted to go to West Point. 24: 2201:Protesting Heath Ledger's funeral 2157:0748, 13 November 2007 (UTC -6) 2466: 1745:the BLP subheading on categories 1705:the BLP subheading on categories 1447:which meets the requirements of 1022:Is this article unbiased enough? 29: 2985:to be the starting motivation. 2010:is a good reference point here. 1515:This article was just added to 1490:the links in my comment above. 1156:Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view 1126:This article is becoming a joke 765:God hates Knowledge's hypocrisy 2890:01:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 2277:<param name="movie" value=" 2083:You express concern about the 1616:Democratic Senator Robert Byrd 539:People targeted by Fred Phelps 529:Merge sections to WBC article? 1: 2911:15:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2827:01:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 2648:14:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2615:10:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2593:08:52, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 2574:04:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 2551:02:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 2459:14:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC) 2196:21:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 2176:15:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2165:13:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 2126:18:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2116:18:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2106:18:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2093:18:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2076:18:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2066:18:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2054:18:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2044:18:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2028:14:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2018:22:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 1986:22:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 1974:22:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 1934:04:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 1337:citation can be established. 924:Knowledge:No personal attacks 875:20:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 434:04:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 406:20:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 203:06:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 190:06:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 177:21:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 158:17:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 121:22:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 2633:Please maintain a civil tone 2433:15:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 2400:14:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 2377:03:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 2358:03:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 2343:01:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 2324:05:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 2308:23:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 2271:08:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 2248:07:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 2220:14:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 1899:13:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 1889:05:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 1851:22:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 1348:the Reliable Sources section 616:00:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 524:22:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 392:23:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 361:Removed unverified paragraph 333:04:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC) 301:00:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 291:16:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 246:22:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 227:03:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 212:03:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2709:21:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 2329:Democratic Party Membership 1831:10.9 Million Dollar Lawsuit 1794:15:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 1773:15:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 1716:13:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 1695:02:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 1685:01:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 1650:15:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1632:13:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1623:13:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1605:01:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1237:08:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 1051:comment added by ] (] • ]) 628:removed unsourced text per 3010: 2951:02:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 2862:00:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC) 2841:09:25, 23 June 2008 (GMT) 1927:) 03:53, November 12, 2007 1911:Criticism of Bill O'Reilly 1814:—The comment was added by 1581:16:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 920:Knowledge:Reliable sources 890:one_love_greater_than_all 806:07:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 794:07:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 760:12:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 736:07:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 723:03:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 496:14:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 482:03:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 466:06:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 232:Blood, Marriage, or both?? 143:06:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 2995:22:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 2966:16:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 2936:03:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 2796:23:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC) 2676:09:37, 23 June 2008 (GMT) 2314:in their moment of grief. 2023:the article's subject. -- 1567:16:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1551:16:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1534:16:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1524:16:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1502:19:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 1479:19:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 1463:19:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 1412:18:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 1387:03:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1368:00:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1300:18:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 1221:16:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1204:03:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1181:21:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1163:20:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1121:20:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 1111:Childhood Section - NPOV? 764: 747:Violence inspiring speech 707:22:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 652:21:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 644:01:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 594:17:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 578:08:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 560:00:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 550:03:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 509:02:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 445:02:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 420:17:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 354:03:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 312:22:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 274:) 20:17, 23 January 2007 2784:they are conservatives). 2085:Knowledge:External_links 2033:Knowledge:External_links 1971:".. We are ALL Kosh..." 1739:) 07:22, 14 August 2007. 1280:09:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1266:22:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 1251:Fred Phelps#Fidel Castro 1146:03:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 1136:21:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC) 1101:17:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 1083:04:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 1073:22:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC) 1013:20:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 999:20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 959:23:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 950:23:20, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 861:04:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 2743:foreign interventionism 2200: 984:) 00:52, March 29, 2008 931:15:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 888:16:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 851:21:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 841:14:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 829:) 22:15, 28 April 2007. 502:Westboro Baptist Church 100:Connection with Al Gore 1996:Knowledge:Attack sites 1791:Christopher Mann McKay 1743:That is not the case: 1682:Christopher Mann McKay 1602:Christopher Mann McKay 1297:Christopher Mann McKay 1232:he's mentally stable). 712:VT MASSACRE PROTESTING 378:Topeka Capital-Journal 2564:policies, feel free. 2479:of past discussions. 2420:laws and the like. -- 1787:Category:Antisemitism 1727:comment was added by 1517:Category:Eagle Scouts 1438:) 11:52, 18 July 2007 1026:I think Phelps is an 994:cause some problems. 900:comment was added by 831:22:15, 28 April 2007 817:comment was added by 780:comment was added by 772:your grandson is good 676:Removed Quotes about 671:) 16:44, 26 July 2007 42:of past discussions. 2558:No Original Research 912:) 04:12, 7 May 2007. 602:Other Media Coverage 1857:Christian responses 1779:Category:Homophobia 1591:Category:Homophobia 1443:Only if there is a 541:be merged into the 504:is more of a mess. 2755:John Birch Society 1306:Legitimacy Section 1270:I don't know aye. 937:Article protection 2938: 2922:comment added by 2880:comment added by 2829: 2813:comment added by 2785: 2711: 2695:comment added by 2537:fred= right wing? 2534: 2533: 2491: 2490: 2485:current talk page 2310: 2298:comment added by 2273: 2261:comment added by 2167: 1928: 1919:comment added by 1853: 1841:comment added by 1827: 1740: 1439: 1430:comment added by 1385: 1285:Blue Valley North 1052: 1028:agent_provocateur 985: 972:comment added by 913: 830: 797: 672: 663:comment added by 468: 456:comment added by 356: 344:comment added by 289: 275: 262:comment added by 175: 145: 133:comment added by 123: 111:comment added by 97: 96: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3001: 2917: 2892: 2808: 2737:issues, such as 2721: 2716:there goes the " 2690: 2645: 2639: 2515: 2493: 2492: 2470: 2469: 2463: 2430: 2424: 2293: 2291:</object: --> 2256: 2158: 1969: 1946:Removal of links 1914: 1836: 1813: 1766:Great Depression 1722: 1586:Category removed 1500: 1461: 1425: 1410: 1407: 1375: 1374:it here. — Carl 1318: 1312: 1263: 1258: 1219: 1046: 967: 895: 812: 776:— The preceding 775: 658: 642: 565:Opening sentence 451: 339: 285: 257: 222:along with them. 171: 128: 106: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:Talk:Fred Phelps 3009: 3008: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2898: 2875: 2804: 2728:Lyndon LaRouche 2643: 2637: 2539: 2511: 2467: 2447: 2428: 2422: 2331: 2290:</embed: --> 2285:<embed src=" 2284:</param: --> 2282:</param: --> 2203: 2184: 2150: 1965: 1962:That being said 1948: 1907: 1859: 1833: 1806: 1723:—The preceding 1588: 1574: 1564:Gadget850 ( Ed) 1542:Oh good then :) 1531:Gadget850 ( Ed) 1513: 1491: 1452: 1445:reliable source 1422: 1405: 1402: 1365:Drake Maijstral 1316: 1310: 1308: 1287: 1261: 1256: 1247: 1210: 1193: 1128: 1113: 1024: 991: 939: 896:—The preceding 813:—The preceding 767: 749: 714: 681: 678:Laramie Project 646: 633: 623: 604: 585: 567: 543:Westboro Church 531: 489: 474: 431:Lovablebeautyme 427: 399: 363: 254: 234: 219: 151: 102: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3007: 3005: 2984: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2939: 2903:206.218.218.57 2897: 2894: 2882:216.234.100.88 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2788:173.16.124.196 2724:Larry McDonald 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2585:OuroborosCobra 2577: 2576: 2543:Dark paladin x 2538: 2535: 2532: 2531: 2526: 2521: 2516: 2509: 2504: 2499: 2489: 2488: 2471: 2446: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2361: 2360: 2350:OuroborosCobra 2330: 2327: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2202: 2199: 2188:217.155.20.163 2183: 2182:External links 2180: 2179: 2178: 2149: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2123:No more bongos 2103:No more bongos 2095: 2081: 2063:No more bongos 2059: 2056: 2030: 2015:No more bongos 2011: 2008:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 2000: 1989: 1988: 1958: 1957: 1952: 1947: 1944: 1931:No more bongos 1906: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1858: 1855: 1832: 1829: 1805: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1775: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1751: 1708: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1656: 1652: 1643: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1625: 1587: 1584: 1573: 1570: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1548:OuroborosCobra 1543: 1537: 1536: 1521:OuroborosCobra 1512: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1476:OuroborosCobra 1466: 1465: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1390: 1389: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1286: 1283: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1224: 1223: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1160:Alex.rosenheim 1149: 1148: 1127: 1124: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1055: 1039:fundamentalist 1023: 1020: 1018: 1016: 1015: 990: 987: 964: 963: 962: 961: 956:204.52.215.107 947:OuroborosCobra 938: 935: 934: 933: 928:OuroborosCobra 880: 879: 878: 877: 844: 843: 838:OuroborosCobra 809: 808: 803:OuroborosCobra 766: 763: 757:OuroborosCobra 748: 745: 730: 729: 713: 710: 690: 689: 680: 674: 656: 627: 622: 619: 603: 600: 598: 584: 581: 566: 563: 530: 527: 488: 485: 473: 470: 426: 423: 398: 395: 362: 359: 358: 357: 346:75.174.163.152 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 253: 250: 249: 248: 233: 230: 224:209.169.73.213 218: 215: 209:209.169.73.213 195: 194: 193: 192: 180: 179: 150: 147: 101: 98: 95: 94: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3006: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2982: 2980: 2976: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2895: 2893: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2840: 2836: 2830: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2783: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2767:protectionism 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2719: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2649: 2646: 2640: 2634: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2536: 2530: 2527: 2525: 2522: 2520: 2517: 2514: 2510: 2508: 2505: 2503: 2500: 2498: 2495: 2494: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2477: 2472: 2465: 2464: 2461: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2451:76.177.69.127 2444: 2434: 2431: 2425: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2369:85.240.18.135 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2335:85.242.236.48 2328: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316:Ticklemygrits 2311: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2288: 2280: 2274: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2240:Ticklemygrits 2236: 2235: 2233: 2229: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2208: 2207: 2198: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2173:ForbiddenWord 2170: 2169: 2168: 2166: 2163:was added at 2162: 2156: 2155:TimothyOnline 2147: 2127: 2124: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2114: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2094: 2091: 2086: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2064: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2025:ForbiddenWord 2021: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2012: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1963: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1945: 1943: 1941: 1940:Bill O'Reilly 1936: 1935: 1932: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1912: 1904: 1900: 1897: 1896:Anthony Krupp 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1887: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1875:press release 1874: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1856: 1854: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1816:Michael324324 1811: 1803: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1770:ForbiddenWord 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1714: 1713:ForbiddenWord 1709: 1706: 1702: 1696: 1693: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1683: 1679: 1677: 1675: 1673: 1671: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1592: 1585: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1571: 1569: 1568: 1565: 1561: 1552: 1549: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1518: 1510: 1508: 1503: 1499: 1496: 1495: 1489: 1484: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1464: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1419: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1399: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1388: 1383: 1379: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1360: 1358: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1328: 1322: 1319: 1315: 1314:editprotected 1305: 1301: 1298: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1284: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1267: 1264: 1259: 1252: 1244: 1238: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1201:219.90.136.45 1199: 1190: 1182: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1125: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1110: 1102: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1084: 1081: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1066:Pat Robertson 1063: 1062:Jerry Falwell 1058: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1050: 1043: 1040: 1035: 1031: 1029: 1021: 1019: 1014: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 997: 996:38.119.107.73 988: 986: 983: 979: 975: 974:74.128.149.66 971: 960: 957: 953: 952: 951: 948: 944: 943: 942: 936: 932: 929: 925: 921: 916: 915: 914: 911: 907: 903: 899: 891: 889: 886: 876: 872: 868: 864: 863: 862: 859: 855: 854: 853: 852: 849: 848:69.250.70.234 842: 839: 834: 833: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 807: 804: 800: 799: 798: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 773: 762: 761: 758: 754: 746: 744: 741: 738: 737: 734: 727: 726: 725: 724: 721: 720:71.231.123.65 717: 711: 709: 708: 704: 700: 696: 687: 683: 682: 679: 675: 673: 670: 666: 665:4.243.215.198 662: 654: 653: 650: 645: 641: 638: 637: 631: 626: 620: 618: 617: 613: 609: 601: 599: 596: 595: 592: 589: 582: 580: 579: 576: 575:217.34.39.123 572: 564: 562: 561: 558: 552: 551: 548: 544: 540: 536: 528: 526: 525: 521: 517: 511: 510: 507: 503: 498: 497: 494: 486: 484: 483: 480: 471: 469: 467: 463: 459: 458:68.240.57.238 455: 447: 446: 443: 440: 436: 435: 432: 424: 422: 421: 418: 415: 412: 408: 407: 404: 396: 394: 393: 390: 385: 382: 381:message board 379: 375: 374:support group 370: 368: 360: 355: 351: 347: 343: 337: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 313: 310: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 299: 294: 293: 292: 288: 284: 283: 278: 277: 276: 273: 269: 265: 264:71.237.226.28 261: 251: 247: 244: 240: 239: 238: 231: 229: 228: 225: 216: 214: 213: 210: 205: 204: 201: 191: 188: 184: 183: 182: 181: 178: 174: 170: 169: 163: 162: 161: 159: 156: 148: 146: 144: 140: 136: 135:68.240.57.238 132: 124: 122: 118: 114: 113:75.161.40.137 110: 99: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2979:this section 2972: 2899: 2872: 2854:24.86.196.52 2831: 2815:OoohOoohAaah 2805: 2781: 2747:Anti-Zionism 2739:isolationism 2687: 2607:68.84.224.36 2540: 2512: 2480: 2474: 2448: 2418:open primary 2332: 2312: 2300:24.124.4.220 2275: 2254: 2209: 2204: 2185: 2151: 2036: 1970: 1961: 1959: 1949: 1937: 1921:4.160.189.89 1908: 1883: 1879: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1860: 1843:24.96.182.36 1834: 1807: 1782: 1659: 1593:was removed. 1589: 1578:Cap'n Walker 1575: 1557: 1514: 1511:Eagle Scout? 1506: 1492: 1487: 1467: 1453: 1423: 1404: 1361: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1323: 1320: 1309: 1288: 1272:122.57.34.97 1269: 1249:The section 1248: 1211: 1194: 1129: 1114: 1054: 1044: 1038: 1036: 1032: 1025: 1017: 992: 965: 940: 892: 885:76.101.74.51 881: 845: 810: 771: 768: 750: 742: 739: 731: 718: 715: 691: 655: 647: 634: 624: 608:207.178.98.6 605: 597: 586: 570: 568: 553: 532: 512: 499: 490: 475: 448: 437: 428: 409: 400: 386: 377: 371: 364: 325:Websurfer135 322: 280: 255: 235: 220: 206: 196: 187:Steve Dufour 166: 155:Steve Dufour 152: 125: 103: 75: 43: 37: 2918:—Preceding 2876:—Preceding 2835:Arnold Toht 2809:—Preceding 2735:litmus-test 2697:Mary Larade 2691:—Preceding 2638:Orange Mike 2473:This is an 2423:Orange Mike 2294:—Preceding 2263:58.111.7.99 2257:—Preceding 2212:72.39.61.47 2159:—Preceding 1938:And who is 1915:—Preceding 1837:—Preceding 1647:Newell Post 1614:member and 1426:—Preceding 1143:Newell Post 1047:—Preceding 968:—Preceding 659:—Preceding 621:Anti-semite 533:Should the 452:—Preceding 340:—Preceding 258:—Preceding 129:—Preceding 107:—Preceding 36:This is an 2751:pro-Israel 2445:Frederick? 1967:KoshVorlon 1432:69.37.8.40 1406:Maijstral 1191:Aging Fred 479:Xyzzyplugh 403:Skbarton13 389:Xyzzyplugh 296:caution.-- 2975:this page 2943:Bagofants 2779:pacifists 2718:Dixiecrat 2562:Synthesis 2529:Archive 7 2524:Archive 6 2519:Archive 5 2513:Archive 4 2507:Archive 3 2502:Archive 2 2497:Archive 1 2228:Alphamone 1868:article. 1401:Thanks! 1234:TrulyBlue 1133:BadMojoDE 858:Dissentor 493:NickBurns 487:Impressed 92:Archive 7 87:Archive 6 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2932:contribs 2924:Jstohler 2920:unsigned 2878:unsigned 2823:contribs 2811:unsigned 2705:contribs 2693:unsigned 2670:his cult 2566:TechBear 2392:TechBear 2367:reasons. 2296:unsigned 2259:unsigned 2090:TechBear 2051:TechBear 1917:unsigned 1839:unsigned 1824:contribs 1737:contribs 1725:unsigned 1494:Argyriou 1455:Argyriou 1428:unsigned 1398:WP:UNDUE 1213:Αργυριου 1178:TechBear 1049:unsigned 982:contribs 970:unsigned 910:contribs 902:Nowhere9 898:unsigned 827:contribs 819:Nowhere8 815:unsigned 790:contribs 782:Nowhere8 778:unsigned 733:Kennethv 703:contribs 661:unsigned 636:Argyriou 516:Veratien 454:unsigned 342:unsigned 309:Soniczip 282:Argyriou 272:contribs 260:unsigned 168:Argyriou 131:unsigned 109:unsigned 2987:herorev 2839:Ted Fox 2782:because 2674:Ted Fox 2476:archive 2161:comment 2113:Newtman 2099:Al Gore 2073:Newtman 2041:Newtman 1983:Newtman 1729:Getaway 1692:Getaway 1629:Getaway 1620:Getaway 1098:Ccrashh 1080:Darkdan 867:Can Not 649:Forbear 591:Geo8rge 557:Geo8rge 506:Geo8rge 442:Geo8rge 417:Geo8rge 376:on the 217:Sources 39:archive 2732:neocon 2281:": --> 1886:NCdave 1761:WP:BLP 1598:WP:BLP 1498:(talk) 1459:(talk) 1352:WP:BLP 1217:(talk) 1010:Koweja 1006:WP:RPP 865:Done-- 640:(talk) 630:WP:BLP 547:Koweja 287:(talk) 173:(talk) 2983:claim 2802:Sane? 2771:NAFTA 2238:list? 2071:love. 1999:here. 1655:also. 1118:Eddyy 1070:Filll 686:libel 425:Wife? 298:Filll 252:Abuse 243:garik 200:Filll 16:< 2991:talk 2962:talk 2947:talk 2928:talk 2907:talk 2886:talk 2858:talk 2819:talk 2792:talk 2769:vs. 2759:NATO 2757:vs. 2749:vs. 2741:vs. 2726:and 2701:talk 2644:Talk 2611:talk 2589:talk 2570:talk 2547:talk 2455:talk 2429:Talk 2396:talk 2373:talk 2354:talk 2339:talk 2320:talk 2304:talk 2267:talk 2244:talk 2232:talk 2216:talk 2192:talk 1942:??? 1925:talk 1847:talk 1820:talk 1733:talk 1488:read 1436:talk 1382:talk 1357:WP:V 1340:--- 1276:talk 1262:ecis 1245:Cuba 1064:and 1008:. - 978:talk 954:LOL 906:talk 871:talk 823:talk 786:talk 699:talk 695:mako 669:talk 612:talk 537:and 520:talk 500:The 462:talk 350:talk 329:talk 268:talk 139:talk 117:talk 2958:Wnt 2775:WTO 2560:or 1680:. — 1612:KKK 1378:CBM 1350:in 1068:.-- 571:not 2993:) 2964:) 2949:) 2934:) 2930:• 2909:) 2888:) 2860:) 2825:) 2821:• 2794:) 2786:-- 2765:, 2763:UN 2753:, 2745:, 2707:) 2703:• 2641:| 2613:) 2591:) 2583:-- 2572:) 2549:) 2457:) 2426:| 2398:) 2375:) 2356:) 2341:) 2322:) 2306:) 2269:) 2246:) 2234:) 2218:) 2194:) 1849:) 1826:). 1822:• 1735:• 1546:-- 1451:. 1380:· 1359:. 1344:70 1327:69 1317:}} 1311:{{ 1278:) 1078:-- 980:• 908:• 873:) 836:-- 825:• 792:) 788:• 705:) 632:. 614:) 522:) 514:-- 477:-- 464:) 387:-- 352:) 331:) 270:• 141:) 119:) 2989:( 2960:( 2945:( 2926:( 2905:( 2884:( 2856:( 2817:( 2790:( 2773:/ 2761:/ 2699:( 2609:( 2587:( 2568:( 2545:( 2487:. 2453:( 2394:( 2371:( 2352:( 2337:( 2318:( 2302:( 2265:( 2242:( 2230:( 2214:( 2190:( 1923:( 1845:( 1818:( 1731:( 1662:" 1434:( 1384:) 1376:( 1274:( 1257:A 1158:- 976:( 904:( 869:( 821:( 796:. 784:( 701:• 697:( 667:( 610:( 518:( 460:( 348:( 327:( 266:( 137:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index