1118:. The same condition applies here. Inarguably, he is "famous for something that many consider a negative attribute". The majority of people probably don't hold the guy to very high standards for his involvement with the Nazi party. Yet, this bit of information is listed in the lead sentence of his article. Being the most prominent Nazi in history is definitely considered BAD by the majority of people. Also, being the most prominent anti-homosexual in the world carries a mostly BAD vibe to it. So, why can we list Hitler's Nazism but not Phelps' anti-homosexualism(/ity/ness)? And, please don't simply direct me to NPOV. I think we've all read over that policy and are trying to come to some middleground that doesn't violate it, but also doesn't treat it like the Bible. Am I talking to a wall, or can some of you grasp this?
660:"Two of his sons, Mark and Nate, insist that the church is actually a carefully planned cult that allows Phelps to see himself as a demigod, wielding absolute control over the lives of his family and congregants, essentially turning them into slaves that he can use for the sole purpose of gratifying his every whim and acting as the structure for his delusion that he is the only righteous man on Earth." Is there anyway somebody can reword this section in the Religious Beliefs section to make it less long-winded and more dispassionate? Even though I kind of agree with it, it doesn't sound like something you should find in an encyclopedia
1485:
the LGBT community. For example, Louis
Theroux's documentary shows Phelps' followers with signs, including one which comprised a picture of Diana, Princess of Wales, with a pink triangle stuck onto her forehead, along with the words 'royal whore in hell' written on it. Theroux told an activist working for Phelps' church that the placard is offensive; the reply was "she was a fag-enabler!" Putting a pink triangle on someone is portraying the person as homosexual; yet Diana was straight. Did Diana back the LGBT movement - or do they consider that she was pro-homosexual simply because she had some homosexual friends?
1823:
expression by itself, as it's a colloquialism. "Anti-homosexual" would be the better term to use. It links to the "homophobia" article. That, along with your comment, turned the lightbulb on. A true phobia is an irrational fear. But if you're saying homophobia is not a true phobia, then it supports what I said earlier - that it's merely a "politically correct" term, invented as a pejorative to broadbrush everyone who takes an opposite political stand on the subject.
489:
homosexuality, hatred of homosexuals, and moral disapproval of homosexual acts; which aren't all the same thing. It's often used to describe people who insist they don't hate gays (and wish to "cure" or "save" them). Phelps sets himself apart from most by openly hating homosexual people (not just "sins") and wishing death on them. I think we can and do, make clear what Phelps thinks of homosexuals, without using the term "homophobic" in the lead. --
31:
1568:(notice that his 'god hates the world website' has already made pages for India, Pakistan and Bangladesh!). Equally interesting, though not noticed, is that Fred Phelps appaearantly said 'Saddam Hussain was the one Muslim leader who let them practice the gospel' and had been to Iraq to picket, I believe before the war. That has some disturbing implications, as getting to Iraq was problematic even back then.
926:"Homophobic" is not under discussion. Only "antihomosexual" is. And Phelps himself proclaims that he is anti-homosexual: he owns several websites for the express purpose of publicizing that fact. It is not in the least contentious. Your understanding of BLP is flawed if you think it means we can't say something about Phelps that he already says about himself! -
2897:
the core of most of Phelp's statement. The sermon referenced argues that God does not love everyone, but that in fact god hates sinners, and dwells heavily on sinners' actions being the reason that god does not love them. This is in direct opposition to unconditional election which puts forth that the Elect are Elect through no action of their own.
1738:"irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals." So that's what it means, regardless of whether any particular Wikipedian thinks that's what it should mean. If someone discriminates against homosexuals, they're homophobic, even if they discriminate on the basis of their sincere moral beliefs. -
1724:"homophobia" equates to "fear of homosexuality". It's a PC word, in that it presupposes someone's being anti-homosexual is based on fear rather than on other reasons - such as the sincere belief that homosexual behavior is morally wrong. "gay" is a slangy word. "Anti-homosexuality" would be the most neutral and factual way of saying it.
1004:
2942:
Democrats agree with his views, that doesn't change the fact he identifies as a
Democrat (although he may have left the Party by now, I'm not sure). I'm sure there's a large number of people who are registered Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, etc. that are not wanted by the national committees. You can voice your concerns
2896:
The "Religious
Beliefs" section claims that Phelps is a Calvinist, and specifically that he adheres to the point of unconditional election. The reference given for this point is a sermon of his that is absolutely not Calvinist, and in fact is in near total opposition to unconditional election, as is
2438:
means by "People can't dictate the content of articles merely by creating redirects" since I have not created that redirect, nor am I "dictating" anything, I just politely requested/suggested to edit the article to be more useful (and less ambiguous, if not downright inflamatory) since I cannot do it
2086:
Why have they been taken off? The most depraved porn articles have links to their filth. There seems to be a bias. They don't even allow me to comment. They are here insulting Fred Phelps...saying all kinds of lies cuz they disapprove of his authentic bible-preaching, but they won't tolerate me. If I
1806:
Who said "homophobia" is a phobia??? You're letting etymology mislead you. And, no, I wouldn't use the word "abortionphobic" because it's a neologism with no established meaning...unlike homophobia! I suppose we should let the IP pose his question in a more exact way then, before trying to see if it
1484:
The article fails to define what (in the opinion of Phelps and his followers) qualifies someone as being a fag-enabler. It makes sense for the term to apply to those who promote and support LGBT rights/people, but not all of the people classified as fag-enablers by Phelps and Co. are major backers of
686:
I tried "anti-homosexual", and hope people can accept it. My only problem with "homophobic" is its ambiguous in meaning. "Homophobic" for some, is a phobia. Virtually every source cited in this article mentions his hatred of homosexuals, so I think defamation isn't a worry, whichever term we use.
2941:
I also wondered why political parties are mentioned on certain BLP articles. I was told that if a person makes their political party well-known (in Phelps' case, he ran for office as a
Democrat...so it's not really alleged. it's true), then it's okay to include it in the infobox. Whether or not most
2301:
Please, Black Kite, could you explain why you performed this edit? Firstly, there is more information about the immigration ban on the WBC page, which is why I linked as the "main article". Second, the quotation I provided is specifically taken from The Sun's website, and you have attributed it to
2275:
OK, it seems like there's consensus for just a single listing of his main "godhates" page, explicitly in the external links in addition to the various footnotes. And I would expect that the main page links to all those other "godhates" pages in any case. I still have this nagging suspicion that this
1852:
I don't care what the dictionary claims - "homophobia" is a PC term invented in order to characterize opponents of gay rights as being mentally ill, evil, or whatever - kind of "payback" to certain opponents of gays who characterize gays as being mentally ill, evil, or whatever (as with Phelps). And
1354:
When a bad one goes, a good one could go, too. Imagine Phelps and Billy Graham showing up at the Pearly Gates at the same time. St. Peter says, "OK, which of you two was it that prayed with
Presidents when they agonized over having to send the brave American soldiers off to war; and which of you two
1195:
Anti-homosexuality is the defining hatred. Whenever he's asked about his hatred of other groups, he almost always explains the reason he hates them is their supposed "enabling" of homosexuals. For instance he claims god kills U.S. soldiers for
America's "sin" of allowing homosexuality. He doesn't
345:
What IF the Phelps dude is correct in his beliefs? Not that I believe the dude BUT... there's nobody I know of in direct communication with an invisible, unprovable god-head creator-type being commonly referred to as God or other terms so... as I mumbled; what IF Phelps is correct? Eeeeeek!!!!!!!!!
152:
I would like to second an earlier request to remove the "fundamentalist" description from Bob Jones
University. It does nothing to contribute to the article and in fact seems a bit biased, implying that Phelps received his current ideology from association with that college. Neither of the other two
3135:
Then again Phelps probably considers me a fag because I am bisexual. The man is insane and if I had my way him and his entire cult would be hounded and harrased by people he doesn't like (ie. everyone! Gays, Americans, South
Africans, Britons, the Royal Family etc.) for the rest of his life, People
1836:
phobias - that is, irrational fears that are disorders recognized in the DSM... Most words that end in "phobia" are nonce words made up for the sport of it, and describe hypothetical fears rather than actual ones. That a word ends in "phobia" has meanings other than irrational fear really shouldn't
1796:
a fair question for the article. For comparison, would you say someone who is anti-abortion is "abortionphobic"? Not necessarily. Maybe the problem is the "anti-gay" pointing to an article on "homophobia", when the article should simply say "homophobic". Maybe that would resolve the question raised
1782:
came over 2 hours after my previous edit, and my edit just before that one had said "it's", which I altered since it wasn't clear. Your edit went against my just-previous edit. Whatever. Anyway, they've got a problem with their wording. A phobia is a mental condition, not a behavior. Discrimination
1767:
I didn't change your words: apparently the edit conflict resolution software had a hiccup. Fortunately or unfortunately, dictionaries are the way we determine what words mean, and your disagreement in this case is something you'll need to take up with them. Since there's no actual issue with regard
1283:
It is very odd that wikipedia has taken this, and some of the other, rather incriminating stuff, about Fred Phelps down. The woman's name was Debbie Valgos, and allegedly he had OD'd her on drugs. Heroin maybe? It sounds pretty true. Another disturbing thing you might want to ask yourself is... how
937:
The three biggest pillars of
Knowledge, when relating to people as subjects, are BLP, OR, and NPOV. Those three policies must be followed at all times. Even if generally accepted as accurate (as I have already agreed to be the case), the phrases "homophobic" and "anti-homosexual" do not belong in
410:
I'll comment. While it might not be encyclopedic to mention that Fred Phelps is a bitter, graying, old man, it can nonetheless be observed with the naked eye. You may not be able to track down any news agency or magazine article that has mentioned these qualities Mr. Phelps has, but you would not
192:
I have removed the "fundamentalist" reference from Bob Jones
University. The other two colleges Phelps attended are not given any sort of description. "Fundamentalist" has a negative connotation in many circles and could be unfairly misconstrued as hinting that Phelps and BJU are somehow connected.
3127:
He hates every country in the world and everyone who lives in them, Apparently just because I live in a country where homosexuals are not executed I am a 'fag-enabler', and the Queen is the 'queen of fags', Under that logic surely the westboro baptist church are 'fag enablers' because they live in
2171:
The user's "disposition", and taking into account who his hero is, amounts to trolling behavior, so there's only so far we can extend "good faith". If Phelps does, indeed, have a personal website, it could be considered for inclusion, if it's not already in the article. But such consideration does
960:
Well, yes, you've already stated your opinion that it doesn't belong in the lede, but the prevailing opinion seems to be that "antihomosexual" does belong there. Please stop with the straw-man "homophobic" argument; that word is not under discussion. Using the word "anti-homosexual" in the lede of
3081:
WTF since when has Roman Catholicism been a qualification for being "true Irish" and of what relevence is ones ancestry ? By that logic there are few (if any) "true Americans" indeed given that Ireland was uninhabited 8,000 years ago there are obviously no "true Irish" either ? Seemingly the real
2181:
I'm sure that imagining isn't necessary; surely the man has shot his mouth off about Hendrix at some point. Anyhow, if no one objects, I'll add godhatesfags.com sometime tomorrow to the external links. Nothing representing Phelps' viewpoint is there right now and I don't think we have to worry to
1101:
this has been brought up before, but I think it got overlooked. We're all debating whether or not to mention the qualities of being homophobic or anti-homosexual in the lead paragraph. I can agree that "homophobic" might be misleading, as there's no evidence I can cite that proves he's actually
615:
would intervene, but it would still be something that could be challenged. In the same sense, referring to Fred Phelps as a homophobe / homophobic is up to the interpretation of the person using the word and - as such - has no place in the lead of the article. I'm not against it being elsewhere
524:
as a dictator (which he was). Although it may be unflattering, some things are simply true. The world is not always a cheery place, and as other editors have noted, Phelps is perhaps the definitive example of what "homophobic" is. I can provide many more references if need be. Many people who may
2454:
What I said is exactly what I meant: the fact that a redirect has been created doesn't require us to adjust the article, it means we need to re-evaluate the necessity of the redirect. I don't think we need an article on "fag enabler", a phrase used only by Phelps and his minions, and therefore I
1567:
The claims of the Prophet Muhammad being a 'devil possessed pedophile' who 'started a false religion' are pretty common with evangelicals and the religious right, though Phelps's hatred of Islam seems relatively recent. Alot of it also seems to be tied up with a wider, anti-South Asian prejudice
775:
Of course, the way to do that is not to revert on the basis of your lone opinion. Simply enumerating a laundry list of policies, by the way—policies with which we are all already familiar—and not delineating the actual logic which leads you to conclude that they somehow prevent us from including
299:
I really, really, really, really, really agree whit you because that stupid video is nothing more that a bunch of hate for a man who in the worst of the cases was a nasty comedian and in the best one of the voices of liberal thinking and comedy. So pleace talk about this men denigrate a good man
2856:
Though I would agree that Graham has indeed become more tolerant and more forgiving (indeed, wiser) with age (and that his son certainly has not), I very much doubt that most mainstream Christians would regard the adjusting of one's core theology to include "belief in salvation outside of Jesus
2222:
I apologize, rereading my post I was unclear. I'm only talking about the external links section at the moment; I flippantly threw in a remark about undue weight, assuming that would be a possible objection to including a link to Phelps' site. I realize that the site is already referenced in the
2121:
section is reserved for sites that have not been used in references for some reason, or for links that are critical to understanding the topic. I don't think it would be feasible to include all of Phelps' websites without turning the article into a link farm. Which websites would you like to be
1822:
said homophobia was a phobia - "an irrational fear" - quoting Webster. I'm not changing the article at this point, because it's kind of complicated. The colloquialism "anti-gay" is in the lead, and connects to "homophobia", and there's an immediate problem there: "anti-gay" is an unencyclopedic
1200:". "Extremist" is an overly broad word, which can apply to people ranging from from Hitler to Gandi. The word "bigot" while often applies to Phelps, simply lacks a clear definition. "Anti-homosexual" is a term with a much clearer meaning and useage, even by people on polar opposite sides. --
1038:
of the article. The lead should simply establish who he is with factual information and leave other sections of the article to discuss his apparent homophobia and his anti-homosexual stance. That has been the basis of my entire issue with this article thus far, not the use of those phrases to
2421:
Well, 125, since the term "fag enabler" frankly isn't important enough to be mentioned in the first two paragraphs of this article or to be bolded, perhaps your best recourse is to nominate the inappropriate redirect for deletion. People can't dictate the content of articles merely by creating
2405:
A fag enabler would be someone who won't help Phelps and his ilk wreak havoc on homosexuals. Kind of the "gay equivalent" of the term "n*gg*r lover". Ironically, George Carlin once said that in his day a fag was simply someone who was unmanly, not homosexual. Or as he put it in his usual blunt
1500:
I suspect their animus was provoked by Diana's concern for people with AIDS, and her failure to discriminate against them. It's left as an exercise for the reader how that translates to "fag-enabler". We shouldn't try, I don't think, to define "fag-enabler" for Phelps; it seems simply to mean
2521:
And punctually. I have seen plenty of redirects that send you to articles where the word in the redirect does not actually appear in the article. It is kind of ironic that "fag enabler" would take you to Phelps, as it implies that he himself is a fag enabler. Now, if the redirect said "idiot
1853:
you're right, it does link to a disambiguation page - and since "anti-gay" is a broad-brush political comment, it's fitting. It lets the reader ponder just what it's supposed to mean, as an inadvertent distraction from going on and reading about this Phelps looney (to put it scientifically).
1001:
1737:
I'm not sure what the discussion has to do with the article...is there a proposed change? In any case, to find out what a word means you need to look it up in a dictionary - a word's meaning can't be reconstructed by etymological addition. In this case, Merriam-Webster says homophobia means
2156:
Regardless of this user's uncivil disposition, it appears she has a point. It does seem odd that Phelps' primary website -- and I don't know which would be considered his primary website-- wouldn't be linked in his biography. Even if it pertains more specifically to WBC, it does provide an
1442:
have similar views); he just might be more Biblically-consistent than the vast majority of Christian conservatives out there, but for whatever reason, he has decided to go it solo and disdain support from Republicans (maybe just to make the Democrats look bad by association with his ilk?).
1143:
I'll agree to the inclusion of "anti-homosexual," if others feel that it is necessary for the lead. Personally, since it is very well documented later in the article, I do not feel that it's necessary to have it in the lead, in order to remain neutral in POV. I agree with your reasoning,
730:
Strongly disagree. In order to remain encyclopedic and to maintain neutral point-of-view, it can not be in the lead (although I agree with the phrase being used to describe him, overall). However, if someone wants to place it elsewhere, I have no problem with that. For reference, see
488:
I don't think it's libel, as it's a widely held view of Phelps, based on his actions and words, and is easily sourced. But, I still don't think we should use the word "homophobic" in the lead, as it isn't a sufficiently precise term. It's used to mean different things, such as fear of
2564:
article doesn't mention it, and a google of "2005 flooding of James Bay" brings up nothing. Furthermore the supposed reference (which is just a blog anyway) makes no mention of this event. And anyway, how can a bay flood, it is already a body of water. Did this event actually occur?
1240:
I seem to remember something in this article a few years ago about his daughter-in-law disappearing and he being suspected of her murder... And this being one of the reasons that one of his sons disowned him or something... Am I imagining that or did that used to be in the article?
2368:
Since two people have taken the time to comment already, it's reasonable to assume that many more people are looking for an explanation of the phrase "fag enabler". Would it be more appropriate to have on the main WBC page as part of their views and then have the redirect go there?
3038:
I'm Jewish, yet I sometimes eat shellfish. That doesn't give you the right to tell me I'm not Jewish. Articles on Knowledge tend to use the self-identification standard. It may or may not be notable to show that others reject them, but that doesn't change what you list them as.
1310:
He's getting on a bit.. and he doesn't look too good either (well to be honest he never has). Has anybody found anything noteworthy relating to his health or any other aspects of his personal life (to be perfectly honest I just want to hear he's not keeping too good!), thanks,
2871:
Just my nasty suspicion, but I would bet it's probably more something along the lines of "before Graham explicitly repudiated pseudo-religious hatred," "before Graham said that not every religion except Phelps' is going to Hell," or "before Phelps stopped taking his meds."
1407:
He's run for the positions of Mayor, Governor and the Senate. Since he got 31% of the primaries vote in 1992, he must of had some platform to run on besides "I don't like homosexuals." They should ask Fred or his family what their or his political views besides gays are.
2467:
You are entitled to your opinion. I have (apparently like many others) turned to Knowledge to get an explanation of a phrase I have bumped into while watching a BBC documentary, which I would argue is notable enough. If you disagree, feel free to nominate for deletion.
1106:). The man hasn't walked a step, spoken a word, inhaled or exhaled in the course of recorded history without firing off some quip about how homosexuals are damning the world and what have you. I think "anti-homosexual" is perfectly fitting in the lead paragraph.
2900:
Additionally, the whole "God hates fags" concept and repeated assertions that people are going to hell BECAUSE of their homosexuality and enabling thereof, which is repeated often on his web sites, is directly in contrast to Calvinism and unconditional election.
1862:
I see no reliable sources that back your claim that "homophobia is a PC term invented in order to characterize" people as "mentally ill, evil". While you can believe that, it is not a sustainable position to argue for any content decisions in the article. --
1461:
Phelps is the most rabidly anti-American individual I know of besides Osama bin-Laden, he focuses on American culture and current events much more then any other nation. It would also be peculiar for a racist to take part in the civil rights movement.
196:
To quote a fellow Wikipedian who was in favor of the original wording: "It is suggestive that this is not some normal person who just turned into a lunatic. It also implies that Phelps is just a slightly more extreme version of most fundamentalists."
2702:
To cite it correctly, in fact, you'd have to go to God.hvn and ask The Big Guy for His authoritative opinion on the matter. Normally blogs aren't acceptable, but we would argue for God being a reliable source on the grounds that He knows everything.
610:
What sources? Homophobic is still an adjective, and one that could easily be disputed, at that. To use your example of Adolf Hitler, yes, it is generally accepted that he was an anti-Semite, but it is still a phrase that could be challenged.
2223:
footnotes, as I noted in my response to Jimihh, but I've seen a link to the home page of a major related site in the external links of a lot of articles. I think it's helpful to have that information more easily accessible than in footnotes. --
842:
Calling Fred Phelps "homophobic" or "anti-homosexual" utilizes two "contentious" terms. Therefore, BLP is violated if those phrases are used. Those phrases are also violations of OR because - even when sourced to a reliable publication -
1033:
I respectfully disagree. I don't like the guy any more than the next person, coming from a very pro-military family and having many homosexual friends, but in regard to the purity of the project, those phrases do not belong in the
529:
entry. In fact, I'm actually chuckling a bit right now, as I just looked at the homophobia entry for the first time and there are two picture of the WBC members there (one of Phelps himself). Need it be any more obvious that than?
284:
I really, really think that there should be a mention about his whole "George Carlin is in Hell" rant. I won't add one, because I'm not a Wikipedian (though I've done my fair share of editing,) and because I couldn't be impartial.
595:
I have to disagree. For one, sources have been put for the claim, therefore it is not OR. For another, NPOV doesn't mean ignoring facts because they are unflattering. Would you have Hitler not called an anti-semite by that policy?
2974:
Fred Phelps was NOT involved in the case of Brown vs Board of Education. He simply used that case as the catalyst for his decision to move to Kansas. The reference to Brown vs Board of Education should be removed immediately.
2925:
Why is Mr. Phelps's alleged political party in the box (top right) describing his position as pastor of Westboro Baptist Church? I don't see how this relates to his notorioty, nor do I think most Democrats would accept him as a
1618:
but Fred strikes me as a man who is a little too pre-occupied with gays - than is sanely healthy - I can only speak for myself but as a heterosexual, er I don't think about homosexuals at all, during the course of any given day
2580:
If it's a blog, it's an invalid source, and the quote should be removed. It could even be a hoax. It's certainly possible (though probably unlikely) for a bay to "flood" if enough water comes into it to make it rise noticeably.
2302:
the BBC. I appreciate that the BBC might be considered a better news source, but the quote is from The Sun - and I have provided many more (reliable) sources on the main WBC page which was referenced in my edit. Thanks.
1757:
The IP address raised the question and it deserves an answer. And Webster's definition is also based on a political agenda rather than on what the root words actually mean. Also, don't change the words of other editors.
2317:
Firstly, the WBC article is already linked further up the page; and the BBC links tend to stay static, whereas it's been noted before that The Sun news articles are often archived fairly quickly and lead to dead links.
972:
You have no support for this position other than your own novel interpretation of those policies. Please stop reverting: I believe you are doing so in good faith, but you will likely be blocked if you do not stop.
3136:
would wave their nations flags patriotically, sing songs and hold placards with phrases like "God hates the Westboro Baptist Cult", "You're going to hell, Fred Phelps", "Phelps is a Fag" and "God hates your hate"-
3168:
because I do not want to censor him. But if we could veer this discussion away from personal feelings or mudslinging (even justified mudslinging), I would appreciate it. <-- Laura-Jane -- Oct. 23, 2009 @ 6pm
1673:
features. All the rhetoric (religion!, gay people!, etc) is simply a 'vehicle', a means for a psychopathic personality be able to inflict distress upon others - from which a sadistic psychopath gains pleasure.
503:
You're right. The rest of the introduction paragraph gives more than enough examples of his views, leading the reader to come to whatever conclusions he or she wants. We don't need to explicitly state it. —
429:
Well, yeah, I don't think anyone would question that he's homophobic. The edit, as is, is original research though. It needs to be sourced at least once, especially on something potentially controversy. Per
1102:
AFRAID of gay people. However, there is mountains of evidence that he is against gays in general, the gay movement, the gay agenda, whatever. Let's face facts (not opinions, not passive observations, but
2101:
Only sites critisizing Phelps are listed, none of his sites are listed. This is not fair. IS this supposed to be neutral? haha. Please someone do something about it, thanks. Don't just delete my comments.
1543:"Mohammed: This pervert claimed to be a prophet, when in fact he was just a power-hungry pedophile who created a false religious system that fueled a lot of violent activity and rebellion against God."
1284:
does freddie boy pay for all this stuff, hmmm? I mean travelling around the country, around the world even, with no sustainable means of income? Running those websites. Pretty suspicious if you ask me.
2831:
Is there any source to substantiate the assertion that Graham DOESN'T believe in a literal hell and DOES believe in salvation outside of Christ? This sounds like drivel written by Phelps supporters...
847:
had to make a decision that those phrases applied to Fred Phelps, prior to publishing them... which still leads to the word "contentious." I don't think I even have to explain why NPOV is violated.. --
2483:
Really? You looked up "fag enabler" instead of "Fred Phelps"?? Interesting as that is, I suspect that the "many" others had their curiosity piqued by the redirect, rather than the other way around. -
2157:
illustration to the reader. (I apologize for having dropped in unannounced. I didn't see Jimihh's previous comments before replying to them and I probably wouldn't have responded that way if I had.) --
2136:
They are on Jimihh's talk page, and they are blogs or sites that start with "godhates...", which seems like inflammatory overkill. Also, there are at least 2 sites that are supportive of Phelphs here.
1983:
One of these days he's going to show up at the wrong funeral, where some good ol' boys have their second amendment rights stashed in their pick-em-ups; and they'll take aim at Freddie and say, "Enable
2691:
I meant the numbering remark only as a joke. (note the smiley face.) The reason it doesn't belong is that it's original commentary - a Wikipedian saying "gotcha" or "hypocrite" isn't encyclopedic. -
215:
The issue of the university being fundamentalist is a fact, not an implication - its status is included because it provides context to the biographical substance of the article's subject. See the
1943:
Fag enabler redirects you to this article and yet there is only one mention (that mentioning being in the introduction) of fag enabling. Is it some sort of joke saying that hes a fag enabler?
415:
human display of homophobia. The question is not whether or not Fred Phelps is homophobic. Plain and simple: he is. The question is whether or not it is defamatory to categorize him thus.
1426:
Nope, homosexuality is not his only conservative view, he is also anti-Semitic (anti-Jewish), anti-Irish, anti-Swedish, anti-foreign (except for Saddam Hussein), and a racist nationalist
825:
NPOV states "All Knowledge articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing significant views fairly, proportionately, and without bias."
1080:
A lede is the "brief, sharp statement of the story's essential facts". Thus "Fred Phelps is an anti-gay minister known for disrupting funerals" is pretty much what is called for. If the
961:
the Fred Phelps article is perfectly in accord with WP policies on biographies of living persons, original research, and NPOV. In fact, to avoid using it would probably violate NPOV. -
2904:
If no one has an objection, I am going to reword this to include that he rails against Armenianism (included in the referenced sermon) but does not actually adhere to Calvinist dogma.
1612:
certain mental problems/obsessions manifest themselves because a person denies a perceived flaw in their own character by juxtaposing it on to an external agent i.e. passing the buck
2335:
Hi there, I notice "Fag Enabler" redirects here, but nothing turns up if I search the article for that. Could someone please explain and make sure the term is there (in bold, as per
3023:
Fred Phelps calls himself Baptist and Calvinist, but is in clear contradiction to central tenets of both groups. This is not personal research, you can see many 3rd party sources.
2593:
So the James Bay certainly floods, but we seem to have no reliable source documenting Phelps's speculations on why that may be, and we have no documentation about a 2005 flood. -
892:
be included, merely that they be sourced. This characterization is not at all difficult to source -- it is therefore not contentious. As an example: can you find any source that
761:(OUTDENTED FOR VISIBILITY) I have requested temporary full-protection of the article in order for us to reach a consensus here so that none of us get hit with 3RR blocks. --
702:
I think the change is fine. This clearly belongs in the lede; it's the reason he's famous, it seems to be the prime tenet of his faith, and it's the basis of his "career". -
2254:, but I don't really see any problem in linking to the GHF site on here. Just that link, though - the others, like God Hates Canada and whatnot - would be putting on a bit
787:
BLP states "Biographical material must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality and avoiding original research, particularly if it is
1422:
He ran on the democratic ticket and he supported Gore so he's at least not a Republican. Maybe homosexuality is his only conservative view? 11:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
467:), who keeps adding "homophobic" to the lead. Two well-established users - myself and SWik78 - have removed it. Even though you can source its addition, it's still
411:
be presenting false or dubious information if you mentioned it. Mr. Phelps happens to exhibit the characteristics of a homophobic person. He may, in fact, be the
2943:
1393:
His anti-homosexual stance is ultra-conservative. Is he classified as a conservative? If so, the American conservatives category should be added to the article.
3164:
I would like to point out that this discussion is supposed be about how to improve the article and not your opinion of Fred Phelps. I have left the comments by
1604:
I just think that Freddy, is someone who is so rapped up in every aspect of homosexuality that they can only be in some sort of denial about it to themselves?
1546:
I don't think there are many people in the world who have called Mohammed such things, so this seems like an interesting and noteworthy addition to the page.
2087:
get blocked, I will complain where I can, and if nothing is done. I will expose this. Thanks. Some be kind and add the links to mister Fred Phelps' websites.
1841:
say "anti-homosexual" as well as "anti-gay", and "anti-gay" is linked to what seems to me to be an unhelpful disambiguation page. Why not just unlink it? -
2172:
not include Phelps-like insults toward wikipedia editors. Which reminds me, I can only imagine what Phelps would have to say about someone like Hendrix.
525:
come across the Phelps entry may be unsure about what homophobia is. The hypherlink provided draws them to additional supportive information through the
1837:
surprise anyone. And no, "homophobia" is not identified as pejorative by any dictionary. Anyway, with regard to the article, I think the lede actually
200:
Unless I am gravely mistaken, the purpose of Knowledge is not to "suggest" or "imply". I would appreciate it if the edit was allowed to stand as is.
2531:
Actually, it wouldn't. A redirect for "idiot enabler" would require sending the reader to a disambiguation page. It's a one-too-many relationship.
1084:
needs to be shortened, it could lose the "Phelps Chartered law firm" and the list of "fag-enablers", neither of which are an "essential fact". -
233:
What context does it provide? It would seem to me that enough context is provided by naming the university without adding any extra adjectives.
2847:
I don't know about that, but Graham has become more tolerant and forgiving as he's become older and wiser (a trait so far lacking in his son).
2829:" worked with Billy Graham in his Los Angeles Crusade before Graham changed his views on a literal Hell and salvation outside of Jesus Christ."
2982:
2340:
1553:
3176:
3083:
2386:
Hello. I'm not surprised that other people raised the same issue, especially seeing as nothing has been done to address it. I refer you to
1921:
1635:
1513:
616:(perhaps listed as a criticism), but a lead should remain as neutral as possible, as we are an encyclopedia, not an opinion-based blog. --
347:
307:
117:
2434:
Providing some definition somewhere in the article (not necessarily in the lead) would certainly improve the situation. I'm not sure what
1438:, in fact, that he opposes honoring the US military or flag (Many Amish, Mennonites, Jehovah's Witnesses, Adventists, Quakers, and other
3150:
3066:
3004:
2858:
2833:
2496:
2469:
2440:
2391:
2026:
1950:
1709:
1463:
1256:
808:
OR states "Knowledge does not publish original thought: all material in Knowledge must be attributable to a reliable, published source."
3024:
2269:
2111:
2096:
1575:
1326:
1291:
667:
286:
2406:
fashion, "A fag was someone who wouldn't go downtown and help beat up queers." What was a fag in Carlin's youth has now become a fag
632:
I'd have to say common sense applies just as much to this article as it does to Hitler. I don't see the difference, quite frankly. --
3143:
Buddy, someone I know by the name of "Sharolaid" nailed him and his goofy daughter. As for me, I'd go into berserk if I met them.
2648:
Well, of course it doesn't belong. Every good Catholic knows that the Ninth Commandment is not to covet your neighbor's wife :) -
1214:(ec)I think if you asked the guy himself if he was anti-homosexual (or any other related concept) he would pound on the desk with
464:
3124:
He is anti-Irish, check out www.godhatesireland.com, complete with a backwards Irish flag, and racist sterotypes (leprechauns).
3059:
Ironically, FP's main Irish target, "fag" Senator Norris, is a protestant of English ancestry, not even a true Irish Catholic.
1177:, that we can probably source the statement that he is widely considered a bigot. He hates far more than just gays, after all.
1112:
if someone is famous for something that many consider a negative attribute, we still have to indicate that. NPOV =/= hagiography
2659:
Well, depending on how you count them, then it should be the 8th commandment. I'll try to get a cite before re-inserting it.
520:
I'm a "well-established" user myself. Referring to someone as "homophobic" is no more libelous or ambiguous than referring to
2956:
1175:
1783:
is a behavior, not a mental condition. Either Webster's slipping in his old age, or someone there is not paying attention.
1650:
Or that Phelps is simply a publicity hound who latched onto this issue because he knew it would put him in the spotlight.
1355:
was the clown who showed up at the funerals of those brave American soldiers, carrying the 'God hates fags' signs?" Now,
2200:
I don't know what his main site is, but it's not true that there's nothing representing his "viewpoint" in the article.
193:
While I'm aware there is a note stating that Phelps has denied all connections with BJU, not everyone reads the notes.
2016:
Keep in mind that's the same IP that tried to post a Biblical quotation earlier, in justification of Phelps' behavior.
1537:
I feel the article would benefit from reference to his 'anti-islamic' views, specifically this quote from his website
2742:
1965:
It is a term he is pretty much the only one using, so it redirects here. A redirect doesn't necessarily mean someone
2555:"He has also thanked God for the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and the 2005 flooding of James Bay in central Canada."
1196:
actually claim there's something wrong with being a soldier per se. I object to replacement "anti-homosexual" with
1594:
I know this will probably fall into the 'big hole' (pardon the pun) of No Original Research but has anyone psycho-
877:
You have violated 3rr, if I count correctly. I have reverted, and won't report you, but please don't revert again.
575:
That word, even if it would appear to be true, is purely a violation of neutral point-of-view policies, as well as
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
38:
2045:
You're right, same first two IP address segments, but different IP address, so it may or may not be the same guy.
2986:
2947:
2344:
1864:
1693:
Gay rights activists, as well as Christians of virtually every denomination, have denounced him as a producer of
1557:
1266:
Ah, I found it. It seems like this version of the article has much more information about Phelps' younger days:
434:- "It is Knowledge policy to delete libellous material when it has been identified" - I think it needs to go. —
3180:
3044:
2359:
1974:
1174:
To be honest, there are so many references calling him a bigot, with even senior Catholics calling him on this
637:
601:
351:
331:
113:
3087:
1925:
1639:
1517:
311:
3097:
I read in the article that he is anti-Irish. What are some of the statements that he's made about the Irish?
3070:
3008:
2797:
2500:
2473:
2444:
2395:
1954:
1713:
1467:
3154:
3028:
2862:
2837:
1325:
He'll probably be dead in a few years (hopefully), but insane hatred can keep people going for a long time.
1274:
1252:
290:
3258:
2374:
2228:
2191:
2162:
2127:
1622:
but hey that's just me , a straight guy, whereas Fred, I think he is screaming out for some jail time....
1579:
1490:
1398:
1330:
1295:
1218:
or something similar. To be fair though, that ref does not mention Phelps except in the readers comments.
998:
671:
535:
458:
137:
109:
3165:
3137:
3129:
3098:
2793:
2570:
612:
224:
177:
1792:
The issue the user raised basically is whether "homophobia" is a proper synonym for "anti-gay", so it
3172:
3146:
3062:
3000:
2978:
2877:
2778:
2749:
2674:
2319:
1946:
1917:
1705:
1631:
1571:
1549:
1287:
1244:
663:
549:
545:
531:
454:
303:
216:
169:
105:
234:
201:
154:
153:
colleges he attended have any sort of adjective used to describe them. Bob Jones does not need one.
3082:
irony is that someone having a go at the hatemonger Phelps seems to have a few issues themselves ?
3040:
2911:
2355:
1970:
1316:
1123:
1114:. An example of this (and this is what I mean by this being brought up before) is the article for
633:
597:
561:
420:
327:
238:
205:
158:
220:
173:
3236:
3114:
2848:
2704:
2582:
2532:
2523:
2411:
2387:
2281:
2214:
2201:
2173:
2146:
2137:
2103:
2088:
2057:
2048:
2017:
1988:
1875:
1854:
1824:
1798:
1784:
1759:
1725:
1651:
1538:
1448:
1360:
1345:
1270:
1248:
1205:
1153:
1044:
951:
852:
766:
748:
692:
621:
584:
494:
366:
265:
2354:
This is already discussed at least twice on this talk page. Please look at those discussions. --
128:
from 2006 contains much more information about his childhood. Much of it seems to be taken from
2276:
character is pulling off a gigantic hoax, just to see what trouble he can cause; like the guy (
2117:
Links to godhatesfags.com, godhatescanada.com, etc., are all linked in references. Usually the
3254:
3192:
2931:
2717:
2682:
2664:
2638:
2370:
2259:
2224:
2187:
2158:
2123:
2030:
2001:
1486:
1435:
1394:
1373:
521:
505:
472:
435:
394:
133:
1969:
that thing, only that the article you are directed to is the best at discussing the topic. --
2770:
2618:
2566:
2307:
2107:
2092:
1679:
269:
255:
This crook has friends in Brazil.If you don't believe, see these sites, both in portuguese:
47:
17:
2769:(undent) It's been too long, I don't remember what that commandment was... something about
2186:
in the article about the fringe theory. I assume that would be considered his main site? --
3251:
2873:
2812:
2774:
2745:
2255:
2183:
1997:
1413:
1369:
1223:
1074:
1023:
468:
431:
1383:
1363:
1334:
1320:
2280:)who got a lot of public support when he facetiously proposed putting pants on animals.
1006:
would seem to show that reliable sources has described both him and his organisation as
2907:
2251:
1874:
And yet that's how it's used. But maybe that term came from thin air. Or from a pixie.
1312:
1145:
1119:
1066:
1062:
1015:
732:
557:
416:
2604:
I've removed the sentence in question, which was not supported by the cited source. -
3232:
3110:
2732:
2693:
2650:
2630:
2606:
2595:
2591:
2512:
2485:
2457:
2435:
2424:
2336:
1843:
1809:
1770:
1740:
1503:
1444:
1201:
1185:
1179:
1149:
1134:
1107:
1086:
1054:
1040:
994:
974:
963:
947:
928:
897:
878:
848:
778:
762:
744:
740:
720:
704:
688:
617:
580:
490:
386:
362:
3229:
I'm apparently not established enough as a user to make this change -- ah well :-)
2927:
2713:
2678:
2660:
2634:
2626:
2297:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Fred_Phelps&diff=next&oldid=271826095
2145:
Also, please note that the user is now on a 24-hour block due to personal attacks.
2118:
1115:
1058:
1018:, it seems to me that his attitude to homosexuals is the basis for his notability.
1011:
736:
576:
390:
2388:
Knowledge:Redirect#What_needs_to_be_done_on_pages_that_are_targets_of_redirects.3F
2000:. Keep the comments on topic. As to the original question, no, it's not a joke. —
2455:
don't think we need a redirect: the phrase is simply not sufficiently notable. -
3262:
3240:
3202:
3184:
3158:
3118:
3101:
3091:
3074:
3048:
3032:
3012:
2990:
2963:
2935:
2915:
2881:
2866:
2851:
2841:
2816:
2801:
2782:
2753:
2736:
2721:
2707:
2697:
2686:
2668:
2654:
2642:
2610:
2599:
2585:
2574:
2535:
2526:
2516:
2504:
2489:
2477:
2461:
2448:
2428:
2414:
2399:
2378:
2363:
2348:
2324:
2311:
2303:
2284:
2232:
2217:
2204:
2195:
2176:
2166:
2149:
2140:
2131:
2060:
2051:
2040:
2020:
2011:
1991:
1978:
1958:
1929:
1878:
1869:
1857:
1847:
1827:
1813:
1801:
1787:
1774:
1762:
1744:
1728:
1717:
1683:
1675:
1666:
1654:
1643:
1583:
1561:
1521:
1507:
1494:
1471:
1452:
1431:
1417:
1402:
1348:
1299:
1278:
1260:
1227:
1209:
1190:
1157:
1138:
1127:
1090:
1081:
1048:
1027:
979:
967:
955:
932:
902:
883:
856:
782:
770:
752:
725:
708:
696:
675:
641:
625:
605:
588:
565:
539:
515:
498:
482:
445:
424:
404:
370:
355:
335:
315:
294:
273:
242:
228:
209:
181:
162:
141:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1512:
Maybe it's just snapping at people based on a gut feeling. The heck do I know?
2808:
1695:
1409:
1268:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Fred_Phelps&oldid=55054797#Childhood
1219:
1070:
1019:
553:
526:
262:
1501:"enemy", but there will probably be no reliable sources with a definition. -
2561:
2277:
1427:
2792:
There is no verb in the first sentence, but the page is semi-protected ...
2250:(outdent) It's true that Jimihh was acting like a troll and we should have
3216:
2590:
FWIW, the two most recent severe James Bay floods were in 1985 and 2008.
1670:
888:
Also, you are misinterpreting BLP. Nowhere does it say contentious edits
326:
In my most recent edit I am requesting a citation for this. Very best,
2997:~~ He received an award in the 1980's for his civil rights activitsm.
2726:
Heaven has its own Internet domain? Wow, how did Al Gore ever install
1768:
to the article, I don't know that it needs further discussion here. -
776:
Phelps's claim to fame in the lede is not going to persuade anyone. -
258:
3224:
2857:
Christ" as the result of becoming "more tolerant and forgiving". -
2081:
1132:
Actually, there seems to be nearly unanimous agreement with you. -
1039:
describe him, the fact that they're in the lead of the article. --
743:, all of which - I believe - support my actions in this regard. --
102:
Why is there nothing on his childhood? It could explain his views.
1439:
2082:
Fred Phelps' websites, can someone please add them in the article
1702:
Antifirearm = fear of fire arm? anti means against NOT FEAR OF.
3250:
According to recent news he now also targets lady gaga, source:
3213:
In the education section, the link for "John Muir College" --
2773:, or something about slaying people with the jawbone of an ass?
2056:
But probably NOT, as they both trace to New York City. Sorry!
1539:
http://www.godhatestheworld.com/iraq/posterchildrenforsin.html
25:
2675:
The_Ten_Commandments#Division_of_the_Exodus_20_Commandments
2550:
At the end of the second paragraph, regarding the sentence
2495:
Really. Yes I have, and I find your punctuation excessive.
129:
219:
article which also categorizes the university as such. --
2296:
2046:
1780:
1267:
1197:
548:. Fred Phelps would NEVER stand behind or in front of
382:
125:
3252:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24454887/God-Hates-Lady-Gaga
3217:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Pasadena_City_College#History
997:, anything controversial must be sourced, so these ,
2712:
I can't find anything except blogs. I'm giving up!
1914:Hes English? Welsh? Dutch? Scottish? any one know?
3107:Since there was no source for that, I removed it.
1601:or thought about adding a section to that affect?
2510:Your opinion on my punctuation is duly noted. -
3019:Distinguish from Baptist and Calvinist Identity
1699:propaganda and violence-inspiring hate speech.
1110:had a very good point when he (or she) wrote
148:Regarding the mention of Bob Jones University
8:
2025:You sure about that? Seems that IP only has
1340:Isn't that what the Emperor said to Luke in
2209:And by the way, that website is referenced
1236:Mysterious Disappearance of Daughter-In-Law
263:http://www.cpr.org.br/fabricantes-virus.htm
1065:issues, or that it does not belong in the
1053:Which bit do you disagree with? Is it the
1010:. I think these sources also clear up the
3225:http://en.wikipedia.org/John_Muir_College
2625:I'd like to know if this comment needs a
1779:Hard telling what happened, as your edit
1097:I've gotta throw a few words in here. I
2560:What is this flooding of James Bay? The
3209:Cross-ref error in "Education" section.
3191:This thread is more than a year old. —
1665:Some speculate the underlying issue is
1608:methinks the lady doth protest too much
1430:in countless other ways. He is a total
896:Phelps is anti-gay? Any source at all?
2946:and probably get better help. Cheers.
2743:"Why does God need a reliable source?"
1359:would be a Southwest Airlines moment.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2291:Edits to "Banned from United Kingdom"
7:
1372:. Take your discussion elsewhere. —
2029:, and it was their comment here. —
259:http://www.cpr.org.br/biografia.htm
3221:is incorrect. It should link to
2633:, or if this is common knowledge.
24:
1590:Psychological profiling - Denial?
385:? I don't think it belongs; it's
1832:There are actually only about 3
1148:, in regard to "homophobic." --
29:
2807:Thanks, I have added "is an".
2522:enabler", that would work. :)
2213:times already in the article.
1:
3263:15:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
2737:02:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
2722:01:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
2708:01:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
2698:22:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
2687:22:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
2669:15:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
2655:04:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
2643:04:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
2611:04:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
2600:04:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2586:02:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2575:02:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2536:01:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2527:01:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2517:01:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2505:00:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2490:00:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2478:00:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2462:00:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
2449:23:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
2429:21:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
2415:14:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
2400:13:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
2379:04:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
2364:03:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
2349:00:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
2325:17:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
2312:15:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
2285:05:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2270:05:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2233:05:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2218:05:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2205:05:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2196:05:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2177:05:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2167:05:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2150:04:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2141:04:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2132:04:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2112:04:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2097:04:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
1930:00:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
1879:21:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1870:21:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1858:21:18, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1848:21:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1828:20:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1814:19:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1802:19:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1788:19:50, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1775:19:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1763:19:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1745:17:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1729:14:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1644:11:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1584:14:50, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1562:23:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
1522:21:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1418:22:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
1384:09:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
1364:04:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
1349:03:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
1335:21:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
1300:14:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1279:19:50, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
1261:19:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
393:, and somewhat defamatory. —
142:09:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
132:, a lawsuit filed in 1994. --
3241:17:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
3203:18:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
3185:18:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
2331:Explain "Fag Enabler" please
1718:04:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
1655:23:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
1508:12:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
1495:02:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
1403:02:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
371:17:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
361:Irrelevant to this article.
356:16:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
2970:Brown vs Board of Education
2741:To paraphrase Star Trek V,
2061:01:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
2052:01:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
2041:01:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
2021:00:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
2012:00:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
1992:00:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
1979:22:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
1959:22:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
1684:16:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
1344:- "Hate makes you strong"?
1321:22:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
1228:23:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
1210:23:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
1191:22:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
1158:19:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1139:01:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1128:01:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1091:00:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1049:00:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1028:00:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
980:23:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
968:23:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
956:23:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
933:23:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
903:23:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
884:23:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
857:23:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
783:23:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
771:23:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
753:23:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
726:22:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
709:22:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
697:21:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
676:02:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
642:09:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
626:16:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
606:16:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
589:15:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
566:21:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
540:15:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
516:05:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
499:05:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
483:21:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
471:. Please stop adding it. —
381:Someone want to comment on
3278:
3246:Lady Gaga as a hate target
3159:13:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
3140:15:00, 23 June 2008 (GMT)
3132:09:44, 23 June 2008 (GMT)
3092:19:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
2964:19:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
2936:18:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
2916:07:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
2882:22:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
2783:22:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
2754:22:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
2621:not to bear false witness.
2617:Thereby, Phelps broke the
1807:calls for any changes. -
1453:00:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
446:02:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
425:01:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
405:00:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
316:07:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
251:He has a friend, in Brazil
243:05:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
229:05:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
210:05:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
182:05:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
3119:18:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
3049:02:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
3033:22:50, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
2867:21:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
2852:03:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
2842:03:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
2817:02:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
2802:01:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
1472:02:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
336:01:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
300:memory trought a video.
295:22:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
274:14:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
163:17:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
3102:11:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
3075:19:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
3013:23:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
2827:The article states that
2295:RE: the following edit:
1689:anti gay = homophobia ??
544:I reckon I stand behind
280:George Carlin is in Hell
188:Removed "Fundamentalist"
2991:17:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
2921:Political Party in Box?
1370:not meant to be a forum
377:Adding of "homophobic"?
2823:Billy Graham reference
2546:Flooding of James Bay?
1305:
120:) 07:02, March 5, 2008
2771:Lot and his daughters
946:article. Period. --
42:of past discussions.
2252:ignored his comments
1306:Pastor Fred's Health
656:may need a look-over
217:Bob Jones University
170:Bob Jones University
2677:for the confusion.
1866:The Red Pen of Doom
1797:by the IP address.
719:Agree with above.
3175:comment added by
3161:
3149:comment added by
3077:
3065:comment added by
3003:comment added by
2981:comment added by
1949:comment added by
1920:comment added by
1708:comment added by
1634:comment added by
1574:comment added by
1552:comment added by
1290:comment added by
1263:
1247:comment added by
1189:
678:
666:comment added by
577:original research
522:Fulgencio Batista
306:comment added by
121:
108:comment added by
95:
94:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3269:
3199:
3196:
3187:
3144:
3117:
3060:
3015:
2993:
2961:
2953:
2735:
2696:
2653:
2609:
2598:
2515:
2488:
2460:
2439:myself. Thanks.
2427:
2266:
2263:
2037:
2034:
2008:
2005:
1961:
1932:
1867:
1846:
1812:
1773:
1743:
1720:
1646:
1586:
1564:
1506:
1380:
1377:
1302:
1242:
1183:
1137:
1089:
977:
966:
931:
900:
881:
781:
723:
707:
661:
512:
509:
479:
476:
442:
439:
401:
398:
318:
103:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
18:Talk:Fred Phelps
3277:
3276:
3272:
3271:
3270:
3268:
3267:
3266:
3248:
3211:
3197:
3194:
3170:
3108:
3057:
3021:
2998:
2983:157.166.175.129
2976:
2972:
2959:How you durrin?
2957:
2949:
2926:representative.
2923:
2894:
2825:
2790:
2731:
2692:
2649:
2623:
2605:
2594:
2548:
2511:
2484:
2456:
2423:
2341:222.149.220.119
2333:
2293:
2264:
2261:
2256:too much weight
2084:
2035:
2032:
2006:
2003:
1944:
1941:
1915:
1912:
1865:
1842:
1808:
1769:
1739:
1703:
1691:
1663:
1629:
1615:just a thought
1592:
1569:
1554:202.171.160.133
1547:
1535:
1502:
1482:
1391:
1378:
1375:
1368:Again, this is
1308:
1285:
1238:
1216:damn right I am
1133:
1085:
1008:anti-homosexual
975:
962:
927:
898:
879:
777:
721:
703:
684:
682:anti-homosexual
658:
510:
507:
477:
474:
440:
437:
399:
396:
379:
343:
324:
301:
282:
253:
190:
150:
100:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3275:
3273:
3247:
3244:
3210:
3207:
3206:
3205:
3177:129.110.241.28
3122:
3121:
3095:
3094:
3084:86.112.254.163
3056:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3041:OuroborosCobra
3020:
3017:
2996:
2971:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2922:
2919:
2893:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2885:
2884:
2824:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2789:
2786:
2767:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2724:
2671:
2622:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2602:
2588:
2558:
2557:
2547:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2493:
2492:
2465:
2464:
2432:
2431:
2418:
2417:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2356:OuroborosCobra
2332:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2292:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2119:external links
2083:
2080:
2078:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
1971:OuroborosCobra
1940:
1937:
1935:
1922:151.202.68.145
1911:
1908:
1906:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1732:
1731:
1690:
1687:
1662:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1636:86.130.131.217
1591:
1588:
1534:
1531:
1529:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1514:204.52.215.107
1481:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1456:
1455:
1390:
1387:
1352:
1351:
1307:
1304:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1212:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1078:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
970:
935:
916:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
886:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
712:
711:
683:
680:
657:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
634:OuroborosCobra
630:
629:
628:
598:OuroborosCobra
573:Absolutely not
570:
569:
568:
451:
450:
449:
448:
389:of materials,
378:
375:
374:
373:
348:24.206.248.102
342:
339:
328:NonvocalScream
323:
320:
308:190.157.143.32
281:
278:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
189:
186:
185:
184:
149:
146:
145:
144:
110:75.164.209.139
99:
96:
93:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3274:
3265:
3264:
3260:
3256:
3253:
3245:
3243:
3242:
3238:
3234:
3230:
3227:
3226:
3222:
3219:
3218:
3214:
3208:
3204:
3201:
3200:
3190:
3189:
3188:
3186:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3167:
3162:
3160:
3156:
3152:
3151:68.32.149.132
3148:
3141:
3139:
3133:
3131:
3125:
3120:
3116:
3113:
3112:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3100:
3099:24.128.144.74
3093:
3089:
3085:
3080:
3079:
3078:
3076:
3072:
3068:
3067:70.22.205.219
3064:
3054:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3037:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3030:
3026:
3018:
3016:
3014:
3010:
3006:
3005:70.23.247.242
3002:
2994:
2992:
2988:
2984:
2980:
2969:
2965:
2962:
2960:
2955:
2954:
2952:
2945:
2940:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2933:
2929:
2920:
2918:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2902:
2898:
2891:
2883:
2879:
2875:
2870:
2869:
2868:
2864:
2860:
2859:70.251.93.156
2855:
2854:
2853:
2850:
2849:Baseball Bugs
2846:
2845:
2844:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2834:70.251.93.156
2830:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2799:
2795:
2794:Blue.waterbox
2787:
2785:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2744:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2734:
2729:
2725:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2706:
2705:Baseball Bugs
2701:
2700:
2699:
2695:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2672:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2652:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2603:
2601:
2597:
2592:
2589:
2587:
2584:
2583:Baseball Bugs
2579:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2563:
2556:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2545:
2537:
2534:
2533:Baseball Bugs
2530:
2529:
2528:
2525:
2524:Baseball Bugs
2520:
2519:
2518:
2514:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2497:122.21.223.53
2491:
2487:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2470:122.21.223.53
2463:
2459:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2441:122.21.223.53
2437:
2430:
2426:
2422:redirects. -
2420:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2412:Baseball Bugs
2409:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2392:125.200.66.47
2390:. Thank you.
2389:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2330:
2326:
2323:
2322:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2299:
2298:
2290:
2286:
2283:
2282:Baseball Bugs
2279:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2268:
2267:
2257:
2253:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2216:
2215:Baseball Bugs
2212:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2203:
2202:Baseball Bugs
2199:
2198:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2175:
2174:Baseball Bugs
2170:
2169:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2155:
2151:
2148:
2147:Baseball Bugs
2144:
2143:
2142:
2139:
2138:Baseball Bugs
2135:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2120:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2099:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2079:
2062:
2059:
2058:Baseball Bugs
2055:
2054:
2053:
2050:
2049:Baseball Bugs
2047:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2039:
2038:
2028:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2019:
2018:Baseball Bugs
2015:
2014:
2013:
2010:
2009:
1999:
1996:This isn't a
1995:
1994:
1993:
1990:
1989:Baseball Bugs
1986:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1951:70.23.237.253
1948:
1938:
1936:
1933:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1909:
1907:
1880:
1877:
1876:Baseball Bugs
1873:
1872:
1871:
1868:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1856:
1855:Baseball Bugs
1851:
1850:
1849:
1845:
1840:
1835:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1826:
1825:Baseball Bugs
1821:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1811:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1800:
1799:Baseball Bugs
1795:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1786:
1785:Baseball Bugs
1781:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1761:
1760:Baseball Bugs
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1746:
1742:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1730:
1727:
1726:Baseball Bugs
1723:
1722:
1721:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1710:151.202.89.93
1707:
1700:
1698:
1697:
1688:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1672:
1668:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1652:Baseball Bugs
1649:
1648:
1647:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1627:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1613:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1602:
1599:
1597:
1589:
1587:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1565:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1544:
1541:
1540:
1532:
1530:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1505:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1479:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:70.66.215.185
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1420:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1389:Conservative?
1388:
1386:
1385:
1382:
1381:
1371:
1366:
1365:
1362:
1361:Baseball Bugs
1358:
1350:
1347:
1346:Baseball Bugs
1343:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1303:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1281:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:Faethon Ghost
1269:
1264:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1249:Faethon Ghost
1246:
1235:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1187:
1182:
1181:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:User:IronDuke
1105:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1088:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1014:issue. As to
1013:
1009:
1005:
1002:
999:
996:
981:
978:
971:
969:
965:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
936:
934:
930:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
904:
901:
895:
891:
887:
885:
882:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
858:
854:
850:
846:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
790:
786:
785:
784:
780:
774:
773:
772:
768:
764:
760:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
729:
728:
727:
724:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
710:
706:
701:
700:
699:
698:
694:
690:
681:
679:
677:
673:
669:
665:
655:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
614:
609:
608:
607:
603:
599:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
542:
541:
537:
533:
528:
523:
519:
518:
517:
514:
513:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
480:
470:
466:
463:
460:
456:
447:
444:
443:
433:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
409:
408:
407:
406:
403:
402:
392:
388:
384:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
340:
338:
337:
333:
329:
321:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
297:
296:
292:
288:
279:
277:
275:
271:
267:
264:
260:
256:
250:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
198:
194:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
166:
165:
164:
160:
156:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
124:
123:
122:
119:
115:
111:
107:
97:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3255:Hoo Hoo Nick
3249:
3231:
3228:
3223:
3220:
3215:
3212:
3193:
3163:
3142:
3134:
3126:
3123:
3109:
3096:
3058:
3025:97.89.29.177
3022:
2995:
2973:
2958:
2950:
2948:
2924:
2906:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2828:
2826:
2791:
2768:
2727:
2624:
2559:
2554:
2549:
2494:
2466:
2433:
2407:
2385:
2371:Gimme danger
2334:
2320:
2300:
2294:
2260:
2249:
2225:Gimme danger
2210:
2188:Gimme danger
2159:Gimme danger
2124:Gimme danger
2100:
2085:
2077:
2031:
2002:
1984:
1966:
1942:
1934:
1913:
1905:
1838:
1833:
1819:
1793:
1701:
1694:
1692:
1664:
1625:
1624:
1621:
1617:
1614:
1611:
1607:
1606:
1603:
1600:
1595:
1593:
1576:24.14.224.20
1566:
1545:
1542:
1536:
1533:Anti-Islamic
1528:
1487:Werdnawerdna
1483:
1480:Fag-enablers
1421:
1406:
1395:Werdnawerdna
1392:
1374:
1367:
1356:
1353:
1342:Star Wars VI
1341:
1327:72.183.9.129
1324:
1309:
1292:24.14.224.20
1282:
1265:
1239:
1215:
1178:
1116:Adolf Hitler
1111:
1103:
1098:
1035:
1007:
992:
944:encyclopedia
943:
939:
915:
893:
889:
844:
788:
685:
668:122.56.5.180
659:
613:Common sense
572:
506:
473:
461:
452:
436:
412:
395:
387:WP:SYNthesis
380:
344:
341:Another Note
325:
298:
287:24.74.90.172
283:
257:
254:
199:
195:
191:
151:
134:DearPrudence
104:— Preceding
101:
78:
43:
37:
3171:—Preceding
3145:—Preceding
3061:—Preceding
3055:Anti-Irish?
2999:—Preceding
2977:—Preceding
2619:Commandment
2567:Herostratus
2339:). Thanks.
2182:much about
1945:—Preceding
1939:fag enabler
1916:—Preceding
1704:—Preceding
1667:psychopathy
1661:Psychopathy
1630:—Preceding
1598:ysed Fred?
1570:—Preceding
1548:—Preceding
1286:—Preceding
1243:—Preceding
789:contentious
662:—Preceding
552:, as he is
469:WP:LIBELous
453:This is at
302:—Preceding
168:Please see
36:This is an
2874:arimareiji
2775:arimareiji
2746:arimareiji
2321:Black Kite
1818:Actually,
1436:theocratic
554:homophobic
550:Frank Pais
546:Frank Pais
532:Frank Pais
527:homophobia
455:Frank Pais
2908:Mathlaura
2892:Calvinism
2730:tubes? -
2562:James Bay
2278:Alan Abel
2122:added? --
1910:Ethnicity
1428:xenophobe
1313:Jkaharper
1198:extremist
1146:Swamilive
1120:Swamilive
558:Swamilive
417:Swamilive
383:this edit
235:CorrTerek
202:CorrTerek
155:CorrTerek
126:This edit
98:Childhood
90:Archive 7
85:Archive 6
79:Archive 5
73:Archive 4
68:Archive 3
60:Archive 1
3233:Athansor
3173:unsigned
3147:unsigned
3128:the US?-
3111:Argyriou
3063:unsigned
3001:unsigned
2979:unsigned
2733:Nunh-huh
2694:Nunh-huh
2651:Nunh-huh
2627:citation
2607:Nunh-huh
2596:Nunh-huh
2513:Nunh-huh
2486:Nunh-huh
2458:Nunh-huh
2436:Nunh-huh
2425:Nunh-huh
2211:numerous
2184:WP:UNDUE
2027:one edit
1998:WP:FORUM
1947:unsigned
1918:unsigned
1844:Nunh-huh
1810:Nunh-huh
1771:Nunh-huh
1741:Nunh-huh
1706:unsigned
1696:anti-gay
1671:sadistic
1632:unsigned
1572:unsigned
1550:unsigned
1504:Nunh-huh
1445:Shanoman
1432:theocrat
1288:unsigned
1257:contribs
1245:unsigned
1150:Winger84
1135:Nunh-huh
1087:Nunh-huh
1041:Winger84
976:IronDuke
964:Nunh-huh
948:Winger84
929:Nunh-huh
899:IronDuke
890:must not
880:IronDuke
849:Winger84
845:somebody
779:Nunh-huh
763:Winger84
745:Winger84
722:IronDuke
705:Nunh-huh
664:unsigned
618:Winger84
581:Winger84
465:contribs
432:WP:LIBEL
363:TechBear
304:unsigned
118:contribs
106:unsigned
3198:Annyong
3166:Ted Fox
3138:Ted Fox
3130:Ted Fox
2928:Wuicker
2788:Grammar
2714:Bearian
2679:Bearian
2661:Bearian
2635:Bearian
2408:enabler
2265:Annyong
2036:Annyong
2007:Annyong
1669:, with
1379:Annyong
1063:WP:NPOV
1016:WP:NPOV
733:WP:NPOV
511:Annyong
478:Annyong
441:Annyong
400:Annyong
276:agre22
221:Veritas
174:Veritas
39:archive
3115:(talk)
2631:WP:BLP
2629:, per
2337:WP:MOS
2304:Sibruk
2104:Jimihh
2089:Jimihh
1834:actual
1676:Bucoli
1628:;-))
1055:WP:BLP
1003:, and
995:WP:BLP
942:of an
894:denies
741:WP:BLP
739:, and
266:Agre22
3195:Hello
3169:(GMT)
2809:Kevin
2728:those
2262:Hello
2033:Hello
2004:Hello
1985:this!
1440:sects
1434:, so
1410:Mrdie
1376:Hello
1220:Kevin
1186:Help!
1104:facts
1071:Kevin
1059:WP:OR
1020:Kevin
1012:WP:OR
993:←Per
737:WP:OR
508:Hello
475:Hello
438:Hello
397:Hello
391:WP:OR
16:<
3259:talk
3237:talk
3181:talk
3155:talk
3088:talk
3071:talk
3045:talk
3029:talk
3009:talk
2987:talk
2944:here
2932:talk
2912:talk
2878:talk
2863:talk
2838:talk
2813:talk
2798:talk
2779:talk
2750:talk
2718:talk
2683:talk
2673:See
2665:talk
2639:talk
2571:talk
2501:talk
2474:talk
2445:talk
2396:talk
2375:talk
2360:talk
2345:talk
2308:talk
2258:. —
2229:talk
2192:talk
2163:talk
2128:talk
2108:talk
2093:talk
1975:talk
1955:talk
1926:talk
1839:does
1714:talk
1680:talk
1640:talk
1596:anal
1580:talk
1558:talk
1518:talk
1491:talk
1468:talk
1449:talk
1414:talk
1399:talk
1357:that
1331:talk
1317:talk
1296:talk
1275:talk
1253:talk
1224:talk
1206:talk
1154:talk
1124:talk
1099:know
1082:lede
1075:talk
1069:? -
1067:lead
1061:and
1045:talk
1036:lead
1024:talk
952:talk
940:lead
938:the
853:talk
767:talk
749:talk
693:talk
672:talk
638:talk
622:talk
602:talk
585:talk
562:talk
536:talk
495:talk
459:talk
421:talk
413:best
367:talk
352:talk
332:talk
322:Note
312:talk
291:talk
270:talk
261:and
239:talk
225:talk
206:talk
178:talk
172:. --
159:talk
138:talk
130:this
114:talk
2951:APK
1820:you
1202:Rob
1180:Guy
689:Rob
579:.--
491:Rob
3261:)
3239:)
3183:)
3157:)
3090:)
3073:)
3047:)
3039:--
3031:)
3011:)
2989:)
2934:)
2914:)
2880:)
2865:)
2840:)
2815:)
2800:)
2781:)
2752:)
2720:)
2685:)
2667:)
2641:)
2573:)
2503:)
2476:)
2447:)
2410:.
2398:)
2377:)
2369:--
2362:)
2347:)
2310:)
2231:)
2194:)
2165:)
2130:)
2110:)
2095:)
1987:"
1977:)
1967:is
1957:)
1928:)
1794:is
1716:)
1682:)
1642:)
1626:La
1582:)
1560:)
1520:)
1493:)
1470:)
1462:--
1451:)
1416:)
1408:--
1401:)
1333:)
1319:)
1311:--
1298:)
1277:)
1259:)
1255:•
1226:)
1208:)
1156:)
1126:)
1057:,
1047:)
1026:)
1000:,
954:)
855:)
769:)
751:)
735:,
695:)
687:--
674:)
640:)
624:)
604:)
596:--
587:)
564:)
556:.
538:)
497:)
423:)
369:)
354:)
334:)
314:)
293:)
272:)
241:)
227:)
208:)
180:)
161:)
140:)
116:•
64:←
3257:(
3235:(
3179:(
3153:(
3086:(
3069:(
3043:(
3027:(
3007:(
2985:(
2930:(
2910:(
2876:(
2861:(
2836:(
2832:-
2811:(
2796:(
2777:(
2748:(
2716:(
2681:(
2663:(
2637:(
2569:(
2499:(
2472:(
2443:(
2394:(
2373:(
2358:(
2343:(
2306:(
2227:(
2190:(
2161:(
2126:(
2106:(
2091:(
1973:(
1953:(
1924:(
1712:(
1678:(
1638:(
1578:(
1556:(
1516:(
1489:(
1466:(
1447:(
1412:(
1397:(
1329:(
1315:(
1294:(
1273:(
1251:(
1222:(
1204:(
1188:)
1184:(
1152:(
1122:(
1077:)
1073:(
1043:(
1022:(
950:(
851:(
791:.
765:(
747:(
691:(
670:(
636:(
620:(
600:(
583:(
560:(
534:(
493:(
462:·
457:(
419:(
365:(
350:(
330:(
310:(
289:(
268:(
237:(
223:(
204:(
176:(
157:(
136:(
112:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.