Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy

Source đź“ť

1386:. We know of one email discussion relating to a CIA drone strike in Pakistan that was independently reported in the NYT, but the CIA considers its drone program top secret, even though everyone knows about it. As the "owning agency," if the CIA says it's classified, that's just the way it is, and they don't declassify things even if it's on the front page of the NYT. People who once worked in the classified world, and others, have said for decades that the American classification is too broad and places people at risk of prosecution for handling information they could have no idea was classified. They could go to prison for repeating something they read in the NYT. Fortunately this doesn't happen often, but the risk is always looming, and the demands to "lock her up" is a textbook case of it because of her high profile. 566: 518: 754: 733: 764: 415: 380: 701: 425: 625: 598: 961: 635: 869: 273: 838: 542: 1091: 243: 349: 937: 1142: 1023: 1422: 1185:
I don't care if you found a source to claim this, does wikipedia have like a "come on" tag? I am disputing this based on the many many times I've heard "establishing intent is not necessary" to describe the arrest and prosecution of somebody who isn't a millionaire politician. That claim should not
1537:
Hmm, I guess you are right, Soibangla. I will adjust the text to more properly reflect the source. Since you seem to believe that drawing inference from a direct statement is unprofessional, I've cut the bit about Trump 'admiring' the lawyer; it exists nowhere in the cited article. I've also taken
1361:
Three emails, out of 30,000, were found to be marked as classified, although they lacked classified headers and were only marked with a small "c" in parentheses, described as "portion markings" by Comey. He added it was possible Clinton was not "technically sophisticated" enough to understand what
1336:
So the question is, why does this "encyclopedic" entry then say ( a half dozen or more times): "None" of the HRC server emails were "marked classified"? And the answer is , on Knowledge (XXG), when the party supported by the Knowledge (XXG)-dogma (i.e. the Democrat) sins, obfuscate! (i.e. lie!)
1622:
I should add that saying "noted" effectively confirms in wikivoice that the claim is true, when it is not, which could be deemed slander by falsely alleging someone acted criminally by, say, obstructing justice. and removing "noted" in favor of "claimed" renders the edit even less DUE.
1122:
It's downright startling, then, to observe what happens behind the scenes at Knowledge (XXG). Go to any article and visit the "talk" tab. More often than not, you'll find a somewhat orderly debate, even on contentious topics like Hillary Clinton's e-mails or Donald Trump's sexual abuse
1618:
consequently this content is incorrect and UNDUE and I previously removed it, whereupon the editor called me "dickish" and restored the edit, so I stepped away to avoid a conflict before I removed it again weeks later, and it should now be removed once again.
1309:
I think at a minimum, the combination of the two statements should be worded better because as it's worded now, it's confusing at best and misleading at worst. Since it's in the news again, I think it's critical that these statements should be rewritten.
324:
policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or
1278:
States the following: “From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Department, 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received.”
1225:
While the statute related to Clinton does mention intent, its only in one of the clauses. The problem with prosecutorial discretion requiring intent, is that it effectively erases the portions of the statute that do not require intent.
153: 1294:
The first statement might be wrong (because I think there were 3 emails that were marked with line markings), but it is not contradicted by the second statement, which is talking about unmarked classified information.
1688: 556: 1693: 1498:. No one should actually assume that the man wanted people to inject bleach into their veins. There is ample evidence for when Trump explicitly notes that he uses sarcasm when talking about people he dislikes. 1783: 1683: 1803: 551: 394: 1207:
says "Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States..."
1187: 1505:
exercise a critical ear, so as to understand the true meaning of a quote. In this matter, Trump wasn't actually praising the attorney; most reasonable people should be able to figure that out.
1054: 284: 1703: 1663: 580: 147: 44: 946: 848: 455: 1440: 1708: 334: 472: 1778: 1494:
First off, he 'isn't keeping people guessing'. When the fellow suggested that people inject bleach into themselves in order to fight COVID, he noted that he was being sarcastic
951: 1538:
the liberty of pointing out - in quotes, of course, how Trump made it a central theme of his campaign. Thanks for the heads up, even couched as it was in a dickish comment. -
1733: 715: 1818: 710: 608: 1109: 1798: 1698: 975: 230: 226: 1501:
Yes, Knowledge (XXG) operates solely on citation, usually. However, citation isn't a lemming march, nor is it a suicide pact. When reading a citation's source, editors
575: 508: 398: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 1738: 1658: 1495: 498: 462: 1773: 927: 79: 820: 691: 1793: 1728: 1713: 467: 1768: 917: 988: 970: 852: 320: 1788: 1753: 1723: 1250:
offense. So under 18 USC 793(f), the prosecutor must also prove intention to gather the documents, although the Act does not specifically state that.
810: 681: 1275:
After a years-long FBI investigation, it was determined that Clinton's server did not contain any information or emails that were marked classified.
85: 1808: 1653: 1201:
This sentence refers to the need to estabish criminal intent in regards to prosecuting in this particular circumstance, not broadly for all laws.
893: 168: 1758: 1743: 786: 657: 438: 385: 135: 1472: 1432: 1414: 1673: 532: 283:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been
30: 1763: 1338: 1280: 1748: 1718: 1311: 1191: 450: 1333:
As everyone knows, FBI Directory Comey expicitly said in the press conference: "Three emails were found to be marked as classified."
876: 843: 234: 99: 1678: 1382:
Regarding the 110 classified emails, Comey did not say they were documents, which would have classified headers on them, but rather
1158: 24: 1367:
The headers are plainly visible to say "hey, stupid! CLASSIFIED!" The fact headers weren't there suggests someone else screwed up.
1362:
the three classified markings meant which is consistent with Clinton's claim that she wasn't aware of the meaning of such markings.
777: 738: 648: 603: 129: 104: 20: 446:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
74: 1813: 360: 303: 280: 125: 65: 1668: 299: 175: 1212: 527: 390: 1300: 1247: 1231: 1477:
as Trump commonly uses the "joking/not joking" technique to keep people guessing. "sarcastically" should be removed.
1099: 1037: 517: 242: 185: 1063:
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
326: 109: 1255: 565: 333:. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see 291: 253: 1600:
can anyone find any evidence a Clinton attorney did that? no, they cannot, because it did not happen. the name
1574: 1543: 1514: 141: 366: 1342: 1284: 1208: 1315: 1627:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=1243997933
1296: 1227: 889: 1523:
you are making an entirely subjective judgment that is unsourced. this is Knowledge (XXG), not Facebook.
1474:, and we cannot independently conclude "no reasonable person would assume that was anything but sarcasm," 302:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
295: 55: 892:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
785:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
656:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1436: 70: 763: 753: 732: 1251: 430: 1597:
an editor wrote that Trump "noted" a Clinton attorney "had taken the blame for the missing emails."
1154: 348: 1635: 1570: 1560: 1539: 1528: 1510: 1482: 1468: 1454: 1399: 1391: 1372: 161: 1161:
on 20 May 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
258: 1639: 1578: 1564: 1547: 1532: 1518: 1486: 1458: 1403: 1376: 1346: 1319: 1304: 1288: 1272:
Are we going to talk about the fact that the source for the following statement in the article:
1259: 1235: 1216: 1195: 414: 379: 1168: 1032: 51: 257: 1601: 255: 700: 1110:"Something's terribly wrong with the Internet and Knowledge (XXG) might be able to fix it" 769: 640: 1631: 1556: 1524: 1478: 1444: 1395: 1387: 1368: 1066:
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
634: 624: 597: 1647: 443: 272: 1410: 1327:
In response to the original point that there's contradictory information in here:
960: 541: 1205: 868: 837: 1090: 759: 630: 420: 885: 442:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 1441:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 15 § Midyear Exam
1242: 881: 782: 653: 1421: 1182:"Criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecutions"... 1022: 1569:
I'm sorry, were you needing a dictionary as well? We're done here. -
936: 1246:
must be proved unless a statute says otherwise, i.e., that it is a
1439:. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at 1136: 1085: 342: 312: 267: 259: 15: 1689:
Mid-importance United States presidential elections articles
1021: 959: 935: 699: 564: 540: 516: 290:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
1694:
WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
1615:
it happened, like the many other false things he claims.
781:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1626: 1475: 1427: 1163: 1149: 1014: 1009: 1004: 999: 1784:
B-Class Computer networking articles of Low-importance
160: 1684:
B-Class United States presidential elections articles
1804:
B-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
1435:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
880:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 652:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 174: 1044:Review importance and quality of existing articles 1704:Mid-importance United States Government articles 1664:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance 1047:Identify categories related to Computer Security 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1819:Knowledge (XXG) pages referenced by the press 1709:WikiProject United States Government articles 1359: 1186:be presented as realistic, established fact. 8: 1204:For instance, the Espionage Act 18USC793(f) 1779:Low-importance Computer networking articles 1167:; for the discussion at that location, see 1734:High-importance American politics articles 1053:Identify articles for creation (see also: 983: 832: 727: 592: 374: 329:contentious material about living persons 1799:Mid-importance Computer Security articles 1699:B-Class United States Government articles 1035:. Please allow some days for processing. 483:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 1240:In criminal law, criminal intention, or 834: 729: 594: 552:WikiProject U.S. presidential elections 376: 346: 1604:might be helpful in seeking evidence. 1188:2601:2C0:4881:1A20:D919:1A02:3DF1:5B11 1739:American politics task force articles 1659:Low-importance United States articles 902:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing 7: 1774:B-Class Computer networking articles 874:This article is within the scope of 795:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet 775:This article is within the scope of 666:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 646:This article is within the scope of 436:This article is within the scope of 365:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1794:B-Class Computer Security articles 1729:B-Class American politics articles 1714:WikiProject United States articles 486:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 1769:Low-importance Computing articles 1159:Hillary Clinton email controversy 1100:mentioned by a media organization 1060:Identify articles for improvement 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 25:Hillary Clinton email controversy 1789:All Computer networking articles 1754:Low-importance Internet articles 1724:Mid-importance politics articles 1420: 1394:) 15:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1140: 1089: 867: 836: 762: 752: 731: 633: 623: 596: 423: 413: 378: 347: 271: 241: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1443:until a consensus is reached. 922:This article has been rated as 815:This article has been rated as 686:This article has been rated as 503:This article has been rated as 1809:All Computer Security articles 1654:B-Class United States articles 905:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 1759:WikiProject Internet articles 1744:WikiProject Politics articles 1640:20:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 1404:17:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1377:14:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1347:06:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1320:16:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC) 1305:15:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC) 1289:04:48, 9 September 2022 (UTC) 1260:13:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC) 1236:12:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC) 1217:12:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC) 1108:Jeff Guo (October 25, 2016). 1031:will be generated shortly by 989:WikiProject Computer Security 971:WikiProject Computer Security 968:This article is supported by 944:This article is supported by 896:and see a list of open tasks. 798:Template:WikiProject Internet 789:and see a list of open tasks. 708:This article is supported by 669:Template:WikiProject Politics 660:and see a list of open tasks. 573:This article is supported by 549:This article is supported by 525:This article is supported by 321:biographies of living persons 304:contentious topics procedures 42:Put new text under old text. 711:American politics task force 1674:Mid-importance FBI articles 1356:marked in the lead because: 576:WikiProject U.S. Government 331:must be removed immediately 1835: 1764:B-Class Computing articles 1579:19:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1565:19:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1548:18:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1533:18:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1519:18:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1487:16:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1459:18:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC) 928:project's importance scale 821:project's importance scale 692:project's importance scale 509:project's importance scale 292:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 1749:B-Class Internet articles 1719:B-Class politics articles 1471:, the source says neither 1268:Contradictory Information 982: 967: 943: 921: 862: 814: 747: 707: 685: 618: 572: 548: 524: 502: 439:WikiProject United States 408: 373: 306:before editing this page. 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1679:WikiProject FBI articles 1433:redirects for discussion 1415:Redirects for discussion 1196:21:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC) 444:United States of America 300:normal editorial process 287:as a contentious topic. 1814:All Computing articles 1364: 1098:This article has been 1026: 964: 940: 890:information technology 704: 569: 545: 521: 489:United States articles 395:Presidential elections 355:This article is rated 296:standards of behaviour 75:avoid personal attacks 1147:The contents of the 1025: 963: 947:Networking task force 939: 877:WikiProject Computing 703: 568: 544: 520: 359:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 235:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 1669:B-Class FBI articles 1050:Tag related articles 987:Things you can help 778:WikiProject Internet 649:WikiProject Politics 431:United States portal 105:No original research 1464:mocking and sarcasm 1437:redirect guidelines 1431:has been listed at 1038:More information... 457:Articles Requested! 1611:this happened, he 1209:DashDashUnderscore 1027: 965: 941: 908:Computing articles 705: 570: 546: 522: 361:content assessment 281:contentious topics 86:dispute resolution 47: 1297:ResultingConstant 1228:ResultingConstant 1175: 1174: 1133: 1132: 1112:. Washington Post 1084: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1071: 831: 830: 827: 826: 801:Internet articles 726: 725: 722: 721: 672:politics articles 591: 590: 587: 586: 341: 340: 311: 310: 266: 265: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1826: 1602:David E. Kendall 1451: 1430: 1424: 1248:strict liability 1166: 1144: 1143: 1137: 1125: 1119: 1117: 1093: 1086: 1055:Article requests 1040: 984: 910: 909: 906: 903: 900: 871: 864: 863: 858: 855: 840: 833: 803: 802: 799: 796: 793: 772: 767: 766: 756: 749: 748: 743: 735: 728: 674: 673: 670: 667: 664: 643: 638: 637: 627: 620: 619: 614: 611: 600: 593: 491: 490: 487: 484: 481: 433: 428: 427: 426: 417: 410: 409: 404: 401: 382: 375: 358: 352: 351: 343: 335:this noticeboard 313: 275: 268: 260: 246: 245: 236: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1644: 1643: 1595: 1466: 1445: 1426: 1418: 1270: 1180: 1162: 1141: 1129: 1128: 1115: 1113: 1107: 1103: 1041: 1036: 1019: 907: 904: 901: 898: 897: 856: 846: 800: 797: 794: 791: 790: 770:Internet portal 768: 761: 741: 716:High-importance 671: 668: 665: 662: 661: 641:Politics portal 639: 632: 612: 606: 528:WikiProject FBI 488: 485: 482: 479: 478: 477: 463:Become a Member 429: 424: 422: 402: 388: 356: 294:, any expected 262: 261: 256: 233: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1832: 1830: 1822: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1806: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1786: 1781: 1776: 1771: 1766: 1761: 1756: 1751: 1746: 1741: 1736: 1731: 1726: 1721: 1716: 1711: 1706: 1701: 1696: 1691: 1686: 1681: 1676: 1671: 1666: 1661: 1656: 1646: 1645: 1607:Trump did not 1594: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1571:Jack Sebastian 1540:Jack Sebastian 1511:Jack Sebastian 1508: 1507: 1506: 1499: 1469:Jack Sebastian 1465: 1462: 1417: 1407: 1380: 1379: 1365: 1357: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1238: 1220: 1219: 1202: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1145: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1104: 1097: 1096: 1094: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1051: 1048: 1045: 1029:Article alerts 1020: 1018: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1002: 996: 993: 992: 980: 979: 976:Mid-importance 966: 956: 955: 952:Low-importance 942: 932: 931: 924:Low-importance 920: 914: 913: 911: 894:the discussion 872: 860: 859: 857:Low‑importance 841: 829: 828: 825: 824: 817:Low-importance 813: 807: 806: 804: 787:the discussion 774: 773: 757: 745: 744: 742:Low‑importance 736: 724: 723: 720: 719: 706: 696: 695: 688:Mid-importance 684: 678: 677: 675: 658:the discussion 645: 644: 628: 616: 615: 613:Mid‑importance 601: 589: 588: 585: 584: 581:Mid-importance 571: 561: 560: 557:Mid-importance 547: 537: 536: 533:Mid-importance 523: 513: 512: 505:Low-importance 501: 495: 494: 492: 476: 475: 470: 465: 460: 453: 451:Template Usage 447: 435: 434: 418: 406: 405: 403:Low‑importance 383: 371: 370: 364: 353: 339: 338: 327:poorly sourced 316: 309: 308: 276: 264: 263: 254: 252: 251: 248: 247: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1831: 1820: 1817: 1815: 1812: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1802: 1800: 1797: 1795: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1785: 1782: 1780: 1777: 1775: 1772: 1770: 1767: 1765: 1762: 1760: 1757: 1755: 1752: 1750: 1747: 1745: 1742: 1740: 1737: 1735: 1732: 1730: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1720: 1717: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1700: 1697: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1687: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1677: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1665: 1662: 1660: 1657: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1649: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1614: 1610: 1605: 1603: 1598: 1592: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1509: 1504: 1500: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1463: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1450: 1449: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1429: 1425:The redirect 1423: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1358: 1355: 1352:I have added 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1339:108.29.35.120 1334: 1331: 1328: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281:64.189.17.204 1276: 1273: 1267: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1239: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1183: 1177: 1170: 1169:its talk page 1165: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1146: 1139: 1138: 1135: 1124: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1095: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1065: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1030: 1024: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1001: 998: 997: 995: 994: 990: 986: 985: 981: 977: 974:(assessed as 973: 972: 962: 958: 957: 953: 950:(assessed as 949: 948: 938: 934: 933: 929: 925: 919: 916: 915: 912: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 878: 873: 870: 866: 865: 861: 854: 850: 845: 842: 839: 835: 822: 818: 812: 809: 808: 805: 788: 784: 780: 779: 771: 765: 760: 758: 755: 751: 750: 746: 740: 737: 734: 730: 717: 714:(assessed as 713: 712: 702: 698: 697: 693: 689: 683: 680: 679: 676: 659: 655: 651: 650: 642: 636: 631: 629: 626: 622: 621: 617: 610: 605: 602: 599: 595: 582: 579:(assessed as 578: 577: 567: 563: 562: 558: 555:(assessed as 554: 553: 543: 539: 538: 534: 531:(assessed as 530: 529: 519: 515: 514: 510: 506: 500: 497: 496: 493: 480:United States 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 458: 454: 452: 449: 448: 445: 441: 440: 432: 421: 419: 416: 412: 411: 407: 400: 396: 392: 387: 386:United States 384: 381: 377: 372: 368: 362: 354: 350: 345: 344: 336: 332: 328: 323: 322: 317: 315: 314: 307: 305: 301: 297: 293: 288: 286: 282: 277: 274: 270: 269: 250: 249: 244: 240: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1630: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1612: 1608: 1606: 1599: 1596: 1552: 1502: 1467: 1447: 1446: 1428:Midyear Exam 1419: 1413:" listed at 1411:Midyear Exam 1383: 1381: 1360: 1353: 1335: 1332: 1330:Well, yeah. 1329: 1326: 1312:64.189.17.14 1277: 1274: 1271: 1241: 1184: 1181: 1150:Eric Hoteham 1148: 1134: 1123:allegations. 1121: 1114:. Retrieved 1028: 969: 945: 923: 875: 816: 776: 709: 687: 647: 574: 550: 526: 504: 468:Project Talk 456: 437: 367:WikiProjects 330: 319: 289: 278: 238: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1555:, you say? 1384:information 1164:its history 1116:October 25, 148:free images 31:not a forum 1648:Categories 1153:page were 849:Networking 399:Government 318:While the 285:designated 1632:soibangla 1557:soibangla 1525:soibangla 1479:soibangla 1448:Steel1943 1396:soibangla 1388:soibangla 1369:soibangla 1178:Standards 1033:AAlertBot 899:Computing 886:computing 882:computers 844:Computing 298:, or any 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1243:mens rea 853:Security 792:Internet 783:Internet 739:Internet 663:Politics 654:politics 609:American 604:Politics 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1613:claimed 1593:"noted" 1553:dickish 1354:clearly 1005:history 926:on the 819:on the 690:on the 507:on the 357:B-class 239:21 days 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1155:merged 888:, and 473:Alerts 363:scale. 126:Google 1157:into 1015:purge 1010:watch 991:with: 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1636:talk 1609:note 1575:talk 1561:talk 1544:talk 1529:talk 1515:talk 1503:must 1483:talk 1455:talk 1400:talk 1392:talk 1373:talk 1343:talk 1316:talk 1301:talk 1285:talk 1256:talk 1232:talk 1213:talk 1192:talk 1118:2016 1000:edit 279:The 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1252:TFD 918:Low 811:Low 682:Mid 499:Low 391:FBI 176:TWL 1650:: 1638:) 1577:) 1563:) 1546:) 1531:) 1517:) 1485:) 1457:) 1402:) 1375:) 1345:) 1318:) 1303:) 1287:) 1258:) 1234:) 1215:) 1194:) 1120:. 978:). 954:). 884:, 851:/ 847:: 718:). 607:: 583:). 559:). 535:). 397:/ 393:/ 389:: 237:: 231:11 229:, 227:10 225:, 221:, 217:, 213:, 209:, 205:, 201:, 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 1634:( 1573:( 1559:( 1542:( 1527:( 1513:( 1496:1 1481:( 1453:( 1409:" 1398:( 1390:( 1371:( 1341:( 1314:( 1299:( 1283:( 1254:( 1230:( 1211:( 1190:( 1171:. 1102:: 1057:) 930:. 823:. 694:. 511:. 369:: 337:. 223:9 219:8 215:7 211:6 207:5 203:4 199:3 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Hillary Clinton email controversy
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2
3
4
5
6

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑