Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy

Source đź“ť

1397:. We know of one email discussion relating to a CIA drone strike in Pakistan that was independently reported in the NYT, but the CIA considers its drone program top secret, even though everyone knows about it. As the "owning agency," if the CIA says it's classified, that's just the way it is, and they don't declassify things even if it's on the front page of the NYT. People who once worked in the classified world, and others, have said for decades that the American classification is too broad and places people at risk of prosecution for handling information they could have no idea was classified. They could go to prison for repeating something they read in the NYT. Fortunately this doesn't happen often, but the risk is always looming, and the demands to "lock her up" is a textbook case of it because of her high profile. 577: 529: 765: 744: 775: 426: 391: 712: 436: 636: 609: 972: 646: 880: 284: 849: 553: 1102: 254: 360: 948: 1153: 1034: 1433: 1196:
I don't care if you found a source to claim this, does wikipedia have like a "come on" tag? I am disputing this based on the many many times I've heard "establishing intent is not necessary" to describe the arrest and prosecution of somebody who isn't a millionaire politician. That claim should not
1548:
Hmm, I guess you are right, Soibangla. I will adjust the text to more properly reflect the source. Since you seem to believe that drawing inference from a direct statement is unprofessional, I've cut the bit about Trump 'admiring' the lawyer; it exists nowhere in the cited article. I've also taken
1372:
Three emails, out of 30,000, were found to be marked as classified, although they lacked classified headers and were only marked with a small "c" in parentheses, described as "portion markings" by Comey. He added it was possible Clinton was not "technically sophisticated" enough to understand what
1347:
So the question is, why does this "encyclopedic" entry then say ( a half dozen or more times): "None" of the HRC server emails were "marked classified"? And the answer is , on Knowledge (XXG), when the party supported by the Knowledge (XXG)-dogma (i.e. the Democrat) sins, obfuscate! (i.e. lie!)
1633:
I should add that saying "noted" effectively confirms in wikivoice that the claim is true, when it is not, which could be deemed slander by falsely alleging someone acted criminally by, say, obstructing justice. and removing "noted" in favor of "claimed" renders the edit even less DUE.
1133:
It's downright startling, then, to observe what happens behind the scenes at Knowledge (XXG). Go to any article and visit the "talk" tab. More often than not, you'll find a somewhat orderly debate, even on contentious topics like Hillary Clinton's e-mails or Donald Trump's sexual abuse
1629:
consequently this content is incorrect and UNDUE and I previously removed it, whereupon the editor called me "dickish" and restored the edit, so I stepped away to avoid a conflict before I removed it again weeks later, and it should now be removed once again.
1320:
I think at a minimum, the combination of the two statements should be worded better because as it's worded now, it's confusing at best and misleading at worst. Since it's in the news again, I think it's critical that these statements should be rewritten.
335:
policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or
1289:
States the following: “From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Department, 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received.”
1236:
While the statute related to Clinton does mention intent, its only in one of the clauses. The problem with prosecutorial discretion requiring intent, is that it effectively erases the portions of the statute that do not require intent.
164: 1305:
The first statement might be wrong (because I think there were 3 emails that were marked with line markings), but it is not contradicted by the second statement, which is talking about unmarked classified information.
1699: 567: 1704: 1509:. No one should actually assume that the man wanted people to inject bleach into their veins. There is ample evidence for when Trump explicitly notes that he uses sarcasm when talking about people he dislikes. 1794: 1694: 1814: 562: 405: 1218:
says "Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States..."
1198: 1516:
exercise a critical ear, so as to understand the true meaning of a quote. In this matter, Trump wasn't actually praising the attorney; most reasonable people should be able to figure that out.
1065: 295: 1714: 1674: 591: 158: 55: 957: 859: 466: 1451: 1719: 345: 483: 1789: 1505:
First off, he 'isn't keeping people guessing'. When the fellow suggested that people inject bleach into themselves in order to fight COVID, he noted that he was being sarcastic
962: 1549:
the liberty of pointing out - in quotes, of course, how Trump made it a central theme of his campaign. Thanks for the heads up, even couched as it was in a dickish comment. -
1744: 726: 1829: 721: 619: 1120: 1809: 1709: 986: 241: 237: 1512:
Yes, Knowledge (XXG) operates solely on citation, usually. However, citation isn't a lemming march, nor is it a suicide pact. When reading a citation's source, editors
586: 519: 409: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 1749: 1669: 1506: 509: 473: 1784: 938: 90: 831: 702: 1804: 1739: 1724: 478: 1779: 928: 999: 981: 863: 331: 1799: 1764: 1734: 1261:
offense. So under 18 USC 793(f), the prosecutor must also prove intention to gather the documents, although the Act does not specifically state that.
821: 692: 1286:
After a years-long FBI investigation, it was determined that Clinton's server did not contain any information or emails that were marked classified.
96: 1819: 1664: 1212:
This sentence refers to the need to estabish criminal intent in regards to prosecuting in this particular circumstance, not broadly for all laws.
904: 179: 1769: 1754: 797: 668: 449: 396: 146: 1483: 1443: 1425: 1684: 543: 294:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been
41: 1774: 1349: 1291: 1759: 1729: 1322: 1202: 461: 1344:
As everyone knows, FBI Directory Comey expicitly said in the press conference: "Three emails were found to be marked as classified."
887: 854: 245: 110: 1689: 1393:
Regarding the 110 classified emails, Comey did not say they were documents, which would have classified headers on them, but rather
1169: 35: 1378:
The headers are plainly visible to say "hey, stupid! CLASSIFIED!" The fact headers weren't there suggests someone else screwed up.
1373:
the three classified markings meant which is consistent with Clinton's claim that she wasn't aware of the meaning of such markings.
788: 749: 659: 614: 140: 115: 31: 457:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
85: 1824: 371: 314: 291: 136: 76: 1679: 310: 186: 1223: 538: 401: 1311: 1258: 1242: 1488:
as Trump commonly uses the "joking/not joking" technique to keep people guessing. "sarcastically" should be removed.
1110: 1048: 528: 253: 196: 1074:
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
337: 120: 1266: 576: 344:. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see 302: 264: 1611:
can anyone find any evidence a Clinton attorney did that? no, they cannot, because it did not happen. the name
1585: 1554: 1525: 152: 377: 1353: 1295: 1219: 1326: 1638:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=1243997933
1307: 1238: 900: 1534:
you are making an entirely subjective judgment that is unsourced. this is Knowledge (XXG), not Facebook.
1485:, and we cannot independently conclude "no reasonable person would assume that was anything but sarcasm," 313:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
306: 66: 903:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
796:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
667:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1447: 81: 774: 764: 743: 1262: 441: 1608:
an editor wrote that Trump "noted" a Clinton attorney "had taken the blame for the missing emails."
1165: 359: 1646: 1581: 1571: 1550: 1539: 1521: 1493: 1479: 1465: 1410: 1402: 1383: 172: 1172:
on 20 May 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
269: 17: 1650: 1589: 1575: 1558: 1543: 1529: 1497: 1469: 1414: 1387: 1357: 1330: 1315: 1299: 1283:
Are we going to talk about the fact that the source for the following statement in the article:
1270: 1246: 1227: 1206: 425: 390: 1179: 1043: 62: 268: 1612: 266: 711: 1121:"Something's terribly wrong with the Internet and Knowledge (XXG) might be able to fix it" 780: 651: 1642: 1567: 1535: 1489: 1455: 1406: 1398: 1379: 1077:
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
645: 635: 608: 1658: 454: 283: 1421: 1338:
In response to the original point that there's contradictory information in here:
971: 552: 1216: 879: 848: 1101: 770: 641: 431: 896: 453:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 1452:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 15 § Midyear Exam
1253: 892: 793: 664: 1432: 1193:"Criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecutions"... 1033: 1580:
I'm sorry, were you needing a dictionary as well? We're done here. -
947: 1257:
must be proved unless a statute says otherwise, i.e., that it is a
1450:. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at 1147: 1096: 353: 323: 278: 270: 26: 1700:
Mid-importance United States presidential elections articles
1032: 970: 946: 710: 575: 551: 527: 301:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
1705:
WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
1626:
it happened, like the many other false things he claims.
792:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1637: 1486: 1438: 1174: 1160: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1795:
B-Class Computer networking articles of Low-importance
171: 1695:
B-Class United States presidential elections articles
1815:
B-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
1446:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
891:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 663:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 185: 1055:Review importance and quality of existing articles 1715:Mid-importance United States Government articles 1675:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance 1058:Identify categories related to Computer Security 44:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1830:Knowledge (XXG) pages referenced by the press 1720:WikiProject United States Government articles 1370: 1197:be presented as realistic, established fact. 8: 1215:For instance, the Espionage Act 18USC793(f) 1790:Low-importance Computer networking articles 1178:; for the discussion at that location, see 1745:High-importance American politics articles 1064:Identify articles for creation (see also: 994: 843: 738: 603: 385: 340:contentious material about living persons 1810:Mid-importance Computer Security articles 1710:B-Class United States Government articles 1046:. Please allow some days for processing. 494:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 1251:In criminal law, criminal intention, or 845: 740: 605: 563:WikiProject U.S. presidential elections 387: 357: 1615:might be helpful in seeking evidence. 1199:2601:2C0:4881:1A20:D919:1A02:3DF1:5B11 1750:American politics task force articles 1670:Low-importance United States articles 913:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing 7: 1785:B-Class Computer networking articles 885:This article is within the scope of 806:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet 786:This article is within the scope of 677:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 657:This article is within the scope of 447:This article is within the scope of 376:It is of interest to the following 34:for discussing improvements to the 1805:B-Class Computer Security articles 1740:B-Class American politics articles 1725:WikiProject United States articles 497:Template:WikiProject United States 25: 1780:Low-importance Computing articles 1170:Hillary Clinton email controversy 1111:mentioned by a media organization 1071:Identify articles for improvement 61:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 36:Hillary Clinton email controversy 18:Talk:Hillary Clinton email system 1800:All Computer networking articles 1765:Low-importance Internet articles 1735:Mid-importance politics articles 1431: 1405:) 15:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1151: 1100: 878: 847: 773: 763: 742: 644: 634: 607: 434: 424: 389: 358: 282: 252: 56:Click here to start a new topic. 1454:until a consensus is reached. 933:This article has been rated as 826:This article has been rated as 697:This article has been rated as 514:This article has been rated as 1820:All Computer Security articles 1665:B-Class United States articles 916:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 1770:WikiProject Internet articles 1755:WikiProject Politics articles 1651:20:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 1415:17:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1388:14:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1358:06:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1331:16:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC) 1316:15:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC) 1300:04:48, 9 September 2022 (UTC) 1271:13:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC) 1247:12:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC) 1228:12:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC) 1119:Jeff Guo (October 25, 2016). 1042:will be generated shortly by 1000:WikiProject Computer Security 982:WikiProject Computer Security 979:This article is supported by 955:This article is supported by 907:and see a list of open tasks. 809:Template:WikiProject Internet 800:and see a list of open tasks. 719:This article is supported by 680:Template:WikiProject Politics 671:and see a list of open tasks. 584:This article is supported by 560:This article is supported by 536:This article is supported by 332:biographies of living persons 315:contentious topics procedures 53:Put new text under old text. 722:American politics task force 1685:Mid-importance FBI articles 1367:marked in the lead because: 587:WikiProject U.S. Government 342:must be removed immediately 1846: 1775:B-Class Computing articles 1590:19:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1576:19:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1559:18:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1544:18:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1530:18:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1498:16:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1470:18:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC) 939:project's importance scale 832:project's importance scale 703:project's importance scale 520:project's importance scale 303:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 1760:B-Class Internet articles 1730:B-Class politics articles 1482:, the source says neither 1279:Contradictory Information 993: 978: 954: 932: 873: 825: 758: 718: 696: 629: 583: 559: 535: 513: 450:WikiProject United States 419: 384: 317:before editing this page. 91:Be welcoming to newcomers 1690:WikiProject FBI articles 1444:redirects for discussion 1426:Redirects for discussion 1207:21:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC) 455:United States of America 311:normal editorial process 298:as a contentious topic. 1825:All Computing articles 1375: 1109:This article has been 1037: 975: 951: 901:information technology 715: 580: 556: 532: 500:United States articles 406:Presidential elections 366:This article is rated 307:standards of behaviour 86:avoid personal attacks 1158:The contents of the 1036: 974: 958:Networking task force 950: 888:WikiProject Computing 714: 579: 555: 531: 370:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 246:Auto-archiving period 111:Neutral point of view 1680:B-Class FBI articles 1061:Tag related articles 998:Things you can help 789:WikiProject Internet 660:WikiProject Politics 442:United States portal 116:No original research 1475:mocking and sarcasm 1448:redirect guidelines 1442:has been listed at 1049:More information... 468:Articles Requested! 1622:this happened, he 1220:DashDashUnderscore 1038: 976: 952: 919:Computing articles 716: 581: 557: 533: 372:content assessment 292:contentious topics 97:dispute resolution 58: 1308:ResultingConstant 1239:ResultingConstant 1186: 1185: 1144: 1143: 1123:. Washington Post 1095: 1094: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1082: 842: 841: 838: 837: 812:Internet articles 737: 736: 733: 732: 683:politics articles 602: 601: 598: 597: 352: 351: 322: 321: 277: 276: 77:Assume good faith 54: 16:(Redirected from 1837: 1613:David E. Kendall 1462: 1441: 1435: 1259:strict liability 1177: 1155: 1154: 1148: 1136: 1130: 1128: 1104: 1097: 1066:Article requests 1051: 995: 921: 920: 917: 914: 911: 882: 875: 874: 869: 866: 851: 844: 814: 813: 810: 807: 804: 783: 778: 777: 767: 760: 759: 754: 746: 739: 685: 684: 681: 678: 675: 654: 649: 648: 638: 631: 630: 625: 622: 611: 604: 502: 501: 498: 495: 492: 444: 439: 438: 437: 428: 421: 420: 415: 412: 393: 386: 369: 363: 362: 354: 346:this noticeboard 324: 286: 279: 271: 257: 256: 247: 190: 189: 175: 106:Article policies 27: 21: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1655: 1654: 1606: 1477: 1456: 1437: 1429: 1281: 1191: 1173: 1152: 1140: 1139: 1126: 1124: 1118: 1114: 1052: 1047: 1030: 918: 915: 912: 909: 908: 867: 857: 811: 808: 805: 802: 801: 781:Internet portal 779: 772: 752: 727:High-importance 682: 679: 676: 673: 672: 652:Politics portal 650: 643: 623: 617: 539:WikiProject FBI 499: 496: 493: 490: 489: 488: 474:Become a Member 440: 435: 433: 413: 399: 367: 305:, any expected 273: 272: 267: 244: 132: 127: 126: 125: 102: 72: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1843: 1841: 1833: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1667: 1657: 1656: 1618:Trump did not 1605: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1582:Jack Sebastian 1551:Jack Sebastian 1522:Jack Sebastian 1519: 1518: 1517: 1510: 1480:Jack Sebastian 1476: 1473: 1428: 1418: 1391: 1390: 1376: 1368: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1249: 1231: 1230: 1213: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1156: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1115: 1108: 1107: 1105: 1093: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1040:Article alerts 1031: 1029: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1007: 1004: 1003: 991: 990: 987:Mid-importance 977: 967: 966: 963:Low-importance 953: 943: 942: 935:Low-importance 931: 925: 924: 922: 905:the discussion 883: 871: 870: 868:Low‑importance 852: 840: 839: 836: 835: 828:Low-importance 824: 818: 817: 815: 798:the discussion 785: 784: 768: 756: 755: 753:Low‑importance 747: 735: 734: 731: 730: 717: 707: 706: 699:Mid-importance 695: 689: 688: 686: 669:the discussion 656: 655: 639: 627: 626: 624:Mid‑importance 612: 600: 599: 596: 595: 592:Mid-importance 582: 572: 571: 568:Mid-importance 558: 548: 547: 544:Mid-importance 534: 524: 523: 516:Low-importance 512: 506: 505: 503: 487: 486: 481: 476: 471: 464: 462:Template Usage 458: 446: 445: 429: 417: 416: 414:Low‑importance 394: 382: 381: 375: 364: 350: 349: 338:poorly sourced 327: 320: 319: 287: 275: 274: 265: 263: 262: 259: 258: 192: 191: 129: 128: 124: 123: 118: 113: 104: 103: 101: 100: 93: 88: 79: 73: 71: 70: 59: 50: 49: 46: 45: 39: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1842: 1831: 1828: 1826: 1823: 1821: 1818: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1793: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1693: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1660: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1625: 1621: 1616: 1614: 1609: 1603: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1520: 1515: 1511: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1474: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1461: 1460: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1440: 1436:The redirect 1434: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1369: 1366: 1363:I have added 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1350:108.29.35.120 1345: 1342: 1339: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1292:64.189.17.204 1287: 1284: 1278: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1250: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1194: 1188: 1181: 1180:its talk page 1176: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1150: 1149: 1146: 1135: 1122: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1045: 1041: 1035: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1006: 1005: 1001: 997: 996: 992: 988: 985:(assessed as 984: 983: 973: 969: 968: 964: 961:(assessed as 960: 959: 949: 945: 944: 940: 936: 930: 927: 926: 923: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 889: 884: 881: 877: 876: 872: 865: 861: 856: 853: 850: 846: 833: 829: 823: 820: 819: 816: 799: 795: 791: 790: 782: 776: 771: 769: 766: 762: 761: 757: 751: 748: 745: 741: 728: 725:(assessed as 724: 723: 713: 709: 708: 704: 700: 694: 691: 690: 687: 670: 666: 662: 661: 653: 647: 642: 640: 637: 633: 632: 628: 621: 616: 613: 610: 606: 593: 590:(assessed as 589: 588: 578: 574: 573: 569: 566:(assessed as 565: 564: 554: 550: 549: 545: 542:(assessed as 541: 540: 530: 526: 525: 521: 517: 511: 508: 507: 504: 491:United States 485: 482: 480: 477: 475: 472: 470: 469: 465: 463: 460: 459: 456: 452: 451: 443: 432: 430: 427: 423: 422: 418: 411: 407: 403: 398: 397:United States 395: 392: 388: 383: 379: 373: 365: 361: 356: 355: 347: 343: 339: 334: 333: 328: 326: 325: 318: 316: 312: 308: 304: 299: 297: 293: 288: 285: 281: 280: 261: 260: 255: 251: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200: 198: 194: 193: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 131: 130: 122: 121:Verifiability 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 108: 107: 98: 94: 92: 89: 87: 83: 80: 78: 75: 74: 68: 64: 63:Learn to edit 60: 57: 52: 51: 48: 47: 43: 37: 33: 29: 28: 19: 1641: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1623: 1619: 1617: 1610: 1607: 1563: 1513: 1478: 1458: 1457: 1439:Midyear Exam 1430: 1424:" listed at 1422:Midyear Exam 1394: 1392: 1371: 1364: 1346: 1343: 1341:Well, yeah. 1340: 1337: 1323:64.189.17.14 1288: 1285: 1282: 1252: 1195: 1192: 1161:Eric Hoteham 1159: 1145: 1134:allegations. 1132: 1125:. Retrieved 1039: 980: 956: 934: 886: 827: 787: 720: 698: 658: 585: 561: 537: 515: 479:Project Talk 467: 448: 378:WikiProjects 341: 330: 300: 289: 249: 195: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 105: 30:This is the 1566:, you say? 1395:information 1175:its history 1127:October 25, 159:free images 42:not a forum 1659:Categories 1164:page were 860:Networking 410:Government 329:While the 296:designated 1643:soibangla 1568:soibangla 1536:soibangla 1490:soibangla 1459:Steel1943 1407:soibangla 1399:soibangla 1380:soibangla 1189:Standards 1044:AAlertBot 910:Computing 897:computing 893:computers 855:Computing 309:, or any 99:if needed 82:Be polite 32:talk page 1254:mens rea 864:Security 803:Internet 794:Internet 750:Internet 674:Politics 665:politics 620:American 615:Politics 197:Archives 67:get help 40:This is 38:article. 1624:claimed 1604:"noted" 1564:dickish 1365:clearly 1016:history 937:on the 830:on the 701:on the 518:on the 368:B-class 250:21 days 165:WP refs 153:scholar 1166:merged 899:, and 484:Alerts 374:scale. 137:Google 1168:into 1026:purge 1021:watch 1002:with: 180:JSTOR 141:books 95:Seek 1647:talk 1620:note 1586:talk 1572:talk 1555:talk 1540:talk 1526:talk 1514:must 1494:talk 1466:talk 1411:talk 1403:talk 1384:talk 1354:talk 1327:talk 1312:talk 1296:talk 1267:talk 1243:talk 1224:talk 1203:talk 1129:2016 1011:edit 290:The 173:FENS 147:news 84:and 1263:TFD 929:Low 822:Low 693:Mid 510:Low 402:FBI 187:TWL 1661:: 1649:) 1588:) 1574:) 1557:) 1542:) 1528:) 1496:) 1468:) 1413:) 1386:) 1356:) 1329:) 1314:) 1298:) 1269:) 1245:) 1226:) 1205:) 1131:. 989:). 965:). 895:, 862:/ 858:: 729:). 618:: 594:). 570:). 546:). 408:/ 404:/ 400:: 248:: 242:11 240:, 238:10 236:, 232:, 228:, 224:, 220:, 216:, 212:, 208:, 204:, 167:) 65:; 1645:( 1584:( 1570:( 1553:( 1538:( 1524:( 1507:1 1492:( 1464:( 1420:" 1409:( 1401:( 1382:( 1352:( 1325:( 1310:( 1294:( 1265:( 1241:( 1222:( 1201:( 1182:. 1113:: 1068:) 941:. 834:. 705:. 522:. 380:: 348:. 234:9 230:8 226:7 222:6 218:5 214:4 210:3 206:2 202:1 199:: 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 69:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Hillary Clinton email system
talk page
Hillary Clinton email controversy
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2
3
4
5

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑