1397:(A general point. When I first read T-D years ago, I too paused in surprise. But on reflection, thinking in sociological terms, where I am more comfortable, the Israeli general system is very differentiated and complex for that period, catering to a rapid influx of massive immigrant populations from several areas (b) geared to the exigencies of a rapidly expanding and planned economic structure that required building from ground up all the interlinked workshops in a production chain, with low-cost labour (hence quick induction into apprenticeships) for the primary industrializing base. Top-heavy technical competence was readily available: what was lacking was a craft- and service-competent workforce, which doesn't require an advanced general, modern curriculum for all. On the other side, the WB had almost no industry, labour immigration for better jobs in Jordan was important. The families stayed. Outside of agriculture (its main export), the only thing for a mass of children was to avail themselves of a 12 year free educational system (no tuition fees), which was compulsory. This reported differential has been taken above as, in bare terms, a mockery of Israel and the great Jewish tradition prizing intensive learning. That was not my subtext. I had no subtext. I only had figures from two competent economists which, on checking, don't seem to vary much from what Pollak provides in reproducing the official Israeli statistics for 1965-66, the situation in Israel on the eve of 1967).
1709:
sources. The point is not to 'fix' the figures by WP:OR using
Kleionberger, Pollak etc. The point is to illustrate that for those two scholars, Palestinian youth had access to a free secondary schooling system, compulsory for 12 years. You have used a wide variety of epithets to dismiss their work as 'sloppy', 'dodgy' etc. Perhaps their phrasing lacked a clarity of specification as to what the Israeli data they cite referred to. But to contest the source for for words, in order to invalidate what it says of the Jordean/WB comparison at all, is pointy. As often on Knowledge, where you have solid RS that are not quite clear, one clarifies the issue in a footnote. And there, citing both T-D-D and then Kleinberg and Pollak's data, briefly, is not WP:OR. It simply directs the reader to the issue's complexities. I'm still reading Kleinberger whose picture is very complex. Much more so that you original glowing expostulations of achievement for Israeli youth generally (as opposed to the chronically underfunded Arab Israeli educational sector). Rather than talk of an Israeli average, even there, one has numerous differentials between Ashkenazi and Mizrachi, as when he writes:'In consequence of their slight chance of receiving an academic secondary education, young people from the
2643:"As an analogy facially false"-the US ban on clandestine assassinations remains in place (the opposite impression is given in the note), Israel has never had a law against clandestine assassinations. Awlaki was killed in Yemen-which was not under US occupation. The US drone program began in response to target in areas US forces could not enter, such as Pakistan's tribal region on the Afghan border, again not by looking to Israeli justification for their occupation policies. In killing Awlaki and several other US citizens-America did something irreconcilable with Israel's long standing policy against killing its own people "Jews don't kill Jews", regardless of the circumstances, even treason. As a general point, the US has never recognized Israeli legal opinions as precedent for their own. The official position of the DOJ under Obama (which ordered the Awlaki strike) was that the program was fully compatible with long-standing domestic law. Whatever similarities exist, a 'wider implication' of the West Bank occupation is not the US drone program. Its clear America was going to do whatever it wanted and did not depend on legal precedents from Israel that had already been rejected by essentially the whole world regardless.
2278:. Idk what to do with that but you continue on with the tirade (jc bro calm down). Obviously the Mintz article, where the opening quote is from, is a valid source. However Minz does not endorse but in fact expressly refutes the POV you proceed to push using that quote. Mintz never mentions the WB Occupation but states Israel's defense posture is entirely justifiable, providing stats showing the military threat posed by certain Arab neighbors-Palestine not being 1 of them. The weapons Israel domestically manufactured are detailed and described as for providing defense reserve in case of invasion and aleve Israel's vulnerability to imported munitions, not facilitate an occupation. I am summarizing the source, if you disagree, ok that makes 2 of us, let's proceed and remove it, bc Minz makes zero mention of the WB occ or weapons to enable it, he gives an empirical defense of Israel's MIC as meant to protect from foreign invaders. Please stop trying to keep this content here just bc you want to completely mischaracterize a quote from it. B9 is OR-but since the source for that quote expressly disagreed with you POV it would be better to use that vs Minz.
1853:
disposition is not only understandable but completely justified, providing empirical facts showing the threat Israel faces from its Arab neighbors. The source does not mention Israelâs occupation of the West Bank even once even, indirectly. This source is then miscited to give a distorted background of Israelâs MIC, followed by shady assertions tying atrocities in
Central American to Israelâs occupation of the West Bank. Israeli contractors and advisors did play a significant role in facilitating multiple brutal dictatorships in the listed countries but the nexus to the West Bank occupation isnât actually specified-likely bc it doesnât really exist. After extolling that the occupation credentialed Israelis with the best know how in oppressing populations of people living in the rain forests and jungles of half a dozen central american countries, a claim is then made that Israelis were perfect leads on urban warfare for "many powers"-once again no examples are given and as repeatedly referred to elsewhere on this page-it is nonsense to label the IDFâs oppressive West Bank police state forces as experienced in urban warfare.
1276:
the WB, they should be included for Israel too and Pollak tells us 28+33=60% for 14â18. So I still think that T&DD's unsourced figure of 22.8% for Israel cannot be for all students. Since they aren't specific about it, I still think that it is most likely a figure for
Israeli Arabs and that that clarifies rather than contradicts. More confirmation of this hunch comes from the Library of Congress area study of Israel for 1988. On page 342 there are tables for various types of schools for 1948-9, 1969-70 and 1986-7. The school types are classified as primary, intermediate, secondary, post-secondary. I'll focus on 1969-70 and the totals for primary and secondary. For Hebrew education, 394354 primary, 129436 secondary (ratio 0.328). For Arab education, 85449 primary, 8050 secondary (ratio 0.094). This shows a very strong drop-off in Arab education between primary and secondary that was not present in Hebrew education. By 1986-7, the Arab sector was still behind but catching up: 0.398 and 0.254, respectively.
2747:
extraordinary about the threat Israel faces just the means. Policy makers have not backed up the US drone program by claiming the extraordinary, but that itâs the best means to check threats from territories that are NOT under US occupation. If all weâre missing on is that both nations cited an extraordinary threat as justification for their âwar on terrorismâ Iâll remain lost now thatâs a close enough nexus to be on this page but if you insist on it remaining then why not include every other nation citing âextraordinary circumstancesâ as a justification for their actions. Even if you limit it to terrorism the same claims are made by China defending their ongoing genocide, Putin in
Chechnya etc. Both Thatcher and Canada already beat Israel to such claims that terrorism necessitated a dynamic shift in the law. Itâs simply not a wider implication of the occupation. (Also, uniformed soldiers can generally be targeted on or off the battlefield, including the setting of Sulemani assassination)
1928:'The opening, does not touch on the West Bank Occupation and is used to give an impression of Israel being an illogically militarized state.' The first paragraph defines the context, and connects it, per sources, to the military exigencies of close technological control of the Palestinian territories. Sources connect the two as inextricably intertwined. What you are saying is identical to asserting that, for example, things like the Alon Plan should be discussed without mentioning Syria and the perceived or claimed necessity for a cunctatory buffer zone between Israel proper and the Arab threat to the East. No source does that. The geopolitrical reasoning, regarding foreign powers, was intrinsic to the rationale of occupation. So too, per sources, the development of technologies of occupational efficiency were a significant element in the growth of Israel's economy, and its foreign military sales. This is universally attested.
2350:
using that Minz article as it just makes it so painfully obvious all you just needed a means to push your POV. I read the
Israeli press, Israel certainly had cause to feel threatened in the early 80s but neutral observers can insinuate to what degree they brought it upon themselves-irregardless, external threats to Israel-be they justified, real, imagined or provoked, have declined exponentially since. I always maintained Israel is oppressing the Palestinians, you missed it constantly in your flustered reactions to a dissenting/correcting opinion. You on multiple occasions actually addressed specific lines where I say as much but go off on a tirade at zero point addressing anything tangible. For all your decade and a half editing, research and thousands of supposedly great scholars on this topic, why is the article still only rated CâŚâŚ?!
1355:
school. The numbers alone are not sufficient to calculate a precise figure, but we can get a fairly good estimate. The primary total 660541-163796=496745 covers 8 years of school, all compulsory, so the number in the last year of primary school is about 496745/8=62093. The secondary total 163796 covers 4 years of school, so the number in the first year of secondary school is about 163796/4=40949. Now we have a starting estimate of the fraction of students who go on to secondary school: 40949/62093=66%. The main sources of error: (1) Secondary school was not compulsory so the first year of secondary school would have held considerably more than 1/4 of all secondary students. (2) The population was steadily increasing, not constant. Both errors make the estimate lower than the actual number.
774:
appears to be close (24.8%) to the figure Tumas-Drabkin stated (22.8%) is correct or not. Do that. If you come up with similar results, then Pollak is reliable for the figure, and Tumas-Drabkin for the comparison. 22.8 or 24.8 compared to 44.6 would still be a relevant contrast. (The 2% difference may even reflect a methodological exclusion of some secondary schooling in Israel as not relevant to an integrated school curriculum of the
Jordanisn type, which appears not to have had the extremely varied forms characteristic of Israel's secondary school system. I dunno). A further point is that Tumas-Drabkin isolate a specific age group 15-17, whereas Pollak's figures refer not to age, but to school type, so they probably had access to another source using age as a criterion.
2309:
Knowledge, I responded by writing this. Of several hundred sources, over the last years, less than one handful have been challenged out of 480 notes, and this has been subject to intense adversarial scrutiny. It's a summation of what scholarship states, rather uncontrovertibly. That is not a matter of grievance, mine or
Palestinian. It's called history. If you read the introduction you will note it is the most intensely studied conflict in modern times, so. . . The objectors here write screeds about being unfair to Israel. If I did this for Tibet and the Uyghurs, they'd say I have it in for China (ĺ). You show no familiarity with the literature, and I have dealt with your objections. If you have something that is concrete, I'll read it and examine it to improve the page.
356:
at primary school level, after which things got chaotic. Secondary education was financed by tuition fees, private organizations, and, under various criteria, from special government grants, and the schools were highly differentiated in function and curricula. (a) Academic schools had a 4 year curriculum, basically though 2/3 year courses were occasionally provided for secondary school vocational students. (b) Vocational and agricultural schools had 3/4 year curricula, where the teaching focused on trades, dressmaking, carpentering and the like. These were highly geared to getting young adolescents into the emerging industrial workforce. Israel again had a differential approach to the educational platforms catering to
Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs.
2529:- ok so it was "unprecedented" but had precedent in Israeli claims? How does that make sense? Also according to the factually inapplicable Note that follows, the US had only legally ended assassinations in 1977-29yrs prior, far from distant precedent. Without getting into the fact the 2012 example is as an analogy facially false, let's avoid that altogether and can I ask how this area specifically is proximate to Israel's occupation of the West Bank? Whatever I might think, this seems to clearly fall into the realm of foreign policy. I see an argument for how the US War on Terror has certainly been influenced by Israeli foreign policy but I really dont see a direct nexus with their occupation of the West Bank specifically.
225:. For Jewish 14 to 17 year olds: 62% in school (primary or postprimary) in 1966/7 academic year, 60% for 1961/2, plus an estimated 5 to 7.5% in religious or other schools not inspected by the government. Let's say 67% overall for "the 1960's". The non Jewish part of the population was not large enough or different enough in its education rates to lower the percentage for all of Israel below the upper 50's. Any plausible true number is at least twice the absurd 23% percent claimed in the source and higher than the "participation rate" they give for the West Bank. At ages 14, 15 and 16 a majority of people are in school and at age 17 it drops to 37% (plus some unknown number in the uninspected schools).
698:
linked it for independent verification; I have even transcribe bed Table 6 on p.20, All the relevant data is there, and if the two
Israeli scholars have made an incorrect inference, or if their presentation of that data is flawed, or the statistical methodology that yields them that figure can be challenged, the mathematician here will tell us. The material again is not 'bogus' you contest the figure of 22% for Israel, nothing else. If 22% refers to Arabs in Israel, the error would have been to use Israel for ( 'Israeli Arabs' then we add Israeli Arabs in Israel compared to Arabs in the West Bank. Let us wait for someone with better abilities than I in math to look at this.
2718:
claims that extraordinary circumstances in the occupation of the West Bank and the "wave of terror" justifies extraordinary legal claims. It is not saying any specific US action has precedent in
Israeli actions. It is saying that the construction of this legal arena on the basis of some extraordinary threat has precedence in Israel doing the same. As far as whether Suleimani was a combatant or not, he wasnt actually on a field of battle but its not a point that really matters. Again, it is not that any specific action has precedence in Israeli actions. It is that an entire legal regime was constructed on the basis of some extraordinary threat. As in Israel.
2270:-so as I mentioned, a substantial portion of this section's content, valid or not, does not belong in this article. Seeing as Israel has occupied the West Bank for only ~54 years but was founded ~74 yrs ago, I'm gonna say you've pretty much confessed to using this page to air any/all grievances against Israel for their mistreatment of the Palestinians, ever. Those certainly should be documented on WP, but on a page specifically for the WB occ, they should be limited to that topic. This applies regardless of whatever it is in Bullet 8 you're rambling about. B7, you're seriously gonna claim many sources aren't activist regardless of their credentials?
2394:
section that, especially at this point I don't think can be rehabilitated. But, to mitigate it I will attempt to suggest some suggestions, other than a total re-write that source simply can't remain unless further context is given. To be brutally honest I've even said multiple times that it wouldn't be so glaringly inappropriate if the editor would just replace it with some other source. It can't be that hard to find a source that actually agrees with the opinion that Israel is overly obsessed with national defense; especially considering that the editor has made clear they don't hold their sources to any real standards.
720:. As far as the second is concerned, yes, it looks like you are trying to keep this source specifically in the article for its wording about a "favourable educational basis" (compared even to Israeli Jews!) and as support for your larger SYNTHed narrative, about the supposed value of education to Palestinian Arabs and their heroic upholding of such in the face of ZOG. But if the source makes blatantly false, patently ridiculous claims that do not pass the smell test for anyone loosely familiar with the matter, as several editors have now tried to inform you is the case, then it can be discounted.
987:
absurdity of a figure half the West Bank's. Zero's sudden access to the text revealed further botched statistics in the same section of the book, and the authors also changed the age ranges compared to Kleinberger and presumably the government abstract. Whether that is sloppiness to the point of unreliability with any statistics, terrible editing, words lost in translation, or some bizarre deliberate falsification, this appears not to be a reliable source. I have only read one review of the book, but that one described it as a work of optimism oddly detached from basic realities on the ground.
166:), which coincidentally is the same percentage of West Bank residents said to attend school. Maybe cough up some more details on what the sources say? Probably this article is just a POVFORK of other material, in which case DELEEET!!! may be in order, but in case not, it's worth fixing instances of clear nonsense. It's hard to believe the source (or its sources) define schooling in the same way in Israel and WB to arrive at the stated figures. If it's really comparing apples to apples as the article purports, extremely unlikely to be correct.
1849:
though fact, they are often cited as sources though by no stretch of the imagination would qualify to wiki standards. Further, half of this has no business regardless being on this specific page. Whether an editor agrees with me or not regarding anything else, no one save an editor seeking to push anti-Israeli sentiment to the fullest would draw wiki standard nexus between much of this content and specifically the Israeli occupation of the West Bank. While in other instances content is scholarly but belongs in other areas or pages altogether.
796:
in secondary school. Neither can be inferred from the other. One thing to know is that "secondary school" in Israel (at least in the 1960s) means years 10â12 which is only 1/4 of years 1â12. So the fraction of school students who are in secondary school at any moment cannot ever be larger than 25% in a steady-state situation. So a number like 44.6% is impossible with that interpretation. The only interpretation which is plausible is the fraction of 15â17 year olds who are in school. That cannot be calculated just from school population.
2703:
strike was a "wider implication", in the stated context of the West Bank Occupation and secondly I would like to point out that Suleimani was not a noncombatant, he was a general in the Iranian Army, wearing his uniform, on official business, specifically coordinating with Iraqi shiite militias at the time of the Drone Strike. The assassination of Suleimani is probably the least legally questionable drone assassination, with US officials citing FDR's order to assassinate Yamamoto as precedent, not anything to do with Israel.
577:
education for Arab Israeli's, and primary for Jewish Israeli's - it seems likely they should both be applied to secondary. Schools for "Handicapped kids" are applied to primary education, but are likely to cover both primary and secondary education. "Higher education" is applied to secondary education, but higher education typically means post-secondary, and the term is not clarified here; "Teacher's training colleges" are likely to also mean post-secondary education, not secondary.
752:, and if you want to carry on with such histrionics then kindly do it on a blog or somewhere more suited to such behavior. If you cant find a book then maybe go to an actual library. You may even need to, gasp, ask a librarian to help with a resource exchange. Nobody needs to coddle you here, and that you think something is ridiculous is cool but, as with most personal opinions, not something anybody else has to care about. Thanks in advance for not abusing this talk page further.
927:'working youth'." Presumably the first number was on the way up; the second I can't guess. Now Google has suddenly decided to show me those pages of Tuma and Darin-Drabkin. I see a problem with a related claim on that page: "According to the 1967 census figures, ...among the adult population, fifteen years of age and above, 70.8 per cent received one to eight years of schooling, while 29 per cent had more than nine years of schooling." The census data is
31:
2699:
of the law, the official stance of the US govt was and is that the law remains unchanged. The fact of the matter is the US did not base or derive, need or look to for legitimization Israeli policy/legal precedent. Even if you disagree with much of this what I can't see is how it belongs on this page. I can admit that similarities exist but a direct tie in or "implication" of the West Bank Occupation seems to be such a stretch.
1669:
the wrong age ranges for Israel, apparently because they use the ranges from the West Bank data in a sentence that refers to both WB and Israel figures. This on top of their other nearby sloppiness that you found and the CIR level incompetence issue of not clarifying they (we SYNTHily assume on their behalf) meant Israeli Arabs, resulting in a statement that is nonsensical in its plain meaning. They also speak of "West Bank
1789:
we talk about the occupation itself. Before we talk about actual war crimes. Before we talk about land seizures. We devote more space to that than we do those land seizures, to the permit regime, to torture, to freedom of movement. We devote more space to how white people in American and Europe argue about the occupation than we do to crucial parts of the occupation itself. I dont think that is the right balance.
144:
4 people attending high school (sans giant population from which to skim the cream, something Israel did not have; in any case no advancements of this kind existed in the West Bank or Jordan). Something is off in the data or the interpretation. Since you apparently have access to one of the sources cited, a longer direct quotation or an upload to Wikisource would be useful for clarifying what it actually says.
2274:, I've said a lot, idt I've given the impression I'm holding back and never at any point did I make a single accusations of anti-semitism. But it is very interesting that you made one up, almost like you needed to pretend there was a straw man argument against you in order to hide not from the real ones. You use a similar strategy in the B9, some nonsense comparing what I've said vs addressing it directly;
2778:
law prohibiting torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment is unenforceable outside the United States), and to assert that this war was âunprecedentedâ and thus constituted a legal terra nulla. This last claim has an Israeli precedent: the Israeli military at the start of the second intifada had already characterized its war on terror in the West Bank and Gaza as a legal terra nulla
1945:'Israel's disposition is not only understandable but completely justified, providing empirical facts showing the threat Israel faces from its Arab neighbors.' Yeah, sure. Take a look at the military spending of Lebanon (3%), Jordan (5%), Syria (4%) and Egypt (1.22%), all nations in chaos, with totally inefficient military systems, and two of them are bound by peace treaties with Israel.
1931:'other instances content is scholarly but belongs in other areas or pages altogether.' This is a recycling of the Icewhiz argument, as outlined above. There's no argument that the sourcing is impeccable, just for Chrissake shovel the stuff onto other pages. We don't won't to read the details here. Nope. This is an overview, with numerous sub-page links. That's already been done.
1948:'Israeli contractors and advisors did play a significant role in facilitating multiple brutal dictatorships in the listed countries but the nexus to the West Bank occupation isnât actually specified-likely bc t doesnât really exist.' No. Several sources link the two, not least Jan Nederveen Pieterse, whom a prior,abusive editor desperately tried to get erased from the page.
990:"High school" is not a misinterpretation (or any interpretation at all) of Kleinberger, it is a shorthand for the shared context of a discussion of "14 (or 15) to 17 years old rates of ...". Whatever comparisons hold or fail to hold concerning large differences in any of these indicators will be the same for the others even if the precise numbers are different.
935:(in the WB, 63.2% of men and 25.7% of women) are each rescaled to 100% and then that 100% is split according to the amount of schooling. T&D-D, or their source if they didn't access the Arabic original themselves, apparently didn't notice the rescaling. I get 31% and 13% respectively. I'll try to find the census data for students in the younger age group.
170:
country of origin (including Europe and particularly the Arab countries) had higher levels of education than the rest of the population, and most from places with more advanced education systems than the West Bank or Jordan. But the article would have us believe that despite these facts, secondary education of Israelis was at half the rate of the West Bank.
2504:
the other "wider implications" content, like the much more negative stuff I know you'll want to include, could/should go in the "cultural impact" section. But maybe not, what I am saying is that the content regarding Israel's thriving export market should be moved and made a subsection of "Economic and social benefits and costs of the occupation".
1963:'If other editors agree on retaining the content regarding the profitable R&D-commercial export industry Israel has developed largely via occupying the West Bank for generations, then I ask why isnât it in the "Costs" section?.' Because a thriving and profitable export industry isn't strictly speaking a 'cost', except to Israel's democracy.
1861:
irreconcilable with Israeli policy on such matters. Moreover this particular topic has nothing whatsoever to do with Israelâs law of or occupation of the West Bank. If anything such a discussion would belong on a page regarding or covering Israeli foreign policy, US-Israel relations, Israel's war or terror etc.....
2986:
not the primary targets, whereas a substantial proportion of Palestinian children were killed by Israeli sniper gun-fire directed individually, according to Frank Afflitto." Why do people let them pick and choose quotations like this one, that they then add up to partial sources, with no balanced point of view.
1245:
population etc., are another issue. I think there's a problem with the fact that Israel's school structure was very complex, with tuition fees, private schools, yeshivas, whereas the WB figures refer to a state run general school system with a uniform curriculum, over 12 years. Still, let's wait and see.
2992:
You can see in Yariv Feniger et Ephraim Yuchtman-Yaar. Risk Groups in Exposure to Terror: The Case of Israelâs Citizens Article in Social Forces. Many of the children killed were on the way to school, while older people were killed more frequently in restaurants or while shopping. If you kill people
2985:
I don't get the passivity toward abuse. Here for exemple this random quote: " In the period of the Al-Aqsa uprising, the ratios of those killed indicate that roughly 20- 25% were children on both sides, with the difference that Israeli fatalities were from incidents of body-bombing in which they were
2393:
all other activity aside I'd like to think I did expressly state my objection to the use of that Minz article given the fact that it can't rationally be tied to the West Bank Occupation and is used (more like distorted) as OR for the rest. I've been clear in my stance that this is more or less a sham
2349:
Other than your 1st sentence, itâs getting hard to take you seriously given the constant refusal to stay on topic and just give a direct answer. For someone who canât stop bragging about how well versed theyâre in this topic why donât you go find a source that doesnât directly contradict you and stop
1773:
I disagree, and concur with Selfstudier. It is alluded to in the lead, and terminological obfuscation per Orwell is fundamental to the occupation, a core issue,West Bank or otherwise. It alerts the reader to the problem in the sources themselves, and the wariness to be exercised in reading the page's
1741:
I kind of think it should be removed entirely here, I dont think it is specifically related to the occupation so much as the conflict as a whole. Yes, the settlements vs towns vs colonies or occupied vs disputed parts are related, but I dont think this is a core topic that needs to be covered here at
1673:
having the high educational basis, but Gaza has always had lower education rates, partly due to a higher Muslim population. So do they mean WB+G data (as in the UNESCO figures) or really WB data as the second sentence claims? It is all totally sloppy and not reliable, as if they wrote it hastily for
1668:
But it is SYNTH and guesswork (albeit plausible guesswork) to use Kleinberger to "fix" the errors in the current T&DD source. While it seems very likely that their 22.8 and 84.4 figures are from the Arab data on the same page of the statistical abstract, if that's the case then T and D also give
1319:
I for example, while awaiting more competent input, wondered whether or not T-D's 22.8 average for Israel was their averaging out the twin statistics for 20.36% (Arab Israeli) + 24.8% (Jewish Israeli) to arrive at a general figure for secondary education in Israel regardless of ethnicity. But them,
1275:
has 43.0% for ages 15+. Note that T&DD's number is not presented by them as being in secondary school, but only as "participation in education". This is borne out by the census figures; the percentage for more than primary school is much lower. If older students in primary school are included for
608:
If we were trying to get the percentage of students in secondary education out of all students, then you would be correct, but we are not; we are trying to get the percentage of students who proceed from pre-secondary to secondary education as a proxy for the number of 15 to 17 year olds in secondary
265:
I agree with Sesquivalent that something is wrong here. 22.8% participation for Israeli kids is impossibly low. Unfortunately I can't read that page of the source, but I'll make a guess: the figure is for Arab students in Israel, not all students. To correct the problem, let's start by finding recent
2777:
The purpose of the presidentâs determination was threefold: to avoid the legal penalties and risks of prosecution for IHL violations (i.e., no crime without law), to âmaximizeâ options for the conduct of war and the treatment of captured enemies (which presaged a subsequent claim that international
2698:
the point seemed to be a strong enough nexus between Israel's novel legal position, referred to as "precedent" for the America's drone killing program post 9/11. While the Israeli supreme court has in fact ruled that the situation is nuanced, requiring an extreme re-examination and re-interpretation
2657:
Still missing what the analogy is. The analogy is to the claim that the extreme nature of the threat faced requires new legal justifications to be accepted. Awlaki is an edge case as an American citizen, there are plenty of other targeted killings by the US (eg Suleimani) that do indeed echo Israeli
2049:
Shrike strikes again. I.e. reverts to back another editor, without looking at what they are doing. You made a false edit summary, saying Mondoweiss and Jeff Halper are a problem, and then, in your revert, mass removing a dozen other sources together with Halpe.That is called a blind revert. Undo it.
1848:
At times this page reads more like a partisan essay meant to maximize Israeli wrong than an encyclopedic article. Sources are often misrepresented to create false context followed by viewpoint pushing of pro-Palestinian activists whose background is left out, to back up these individuals rhetoric as
1788:
Its something that matters to people that we arent actually covering. Whether it is called a colony, a settlement, a town, or a village makes zero difference to the people whose land and water are being stolen. That is it doesnt make a whit of difference in the occupation itself. We have this before
1304:
We are making an inference, perhaps legitimate perhaps not,* that T-D's figures for Israel are an error, referring to Israeli Arabs rather than Israeli Jews. Possible. But if we entertain that inference as probable we would still to explain why, according to the Israeli Statistics Bureau figures for
963:
Apologies, I must not have been clear enough above; I have access to Tuma and Darin-Drabkin, and can confirm that it is as Nishidani says, though of course I can't confirm whether T&D are correct. Zero also has access to the relevant sections, though they have focused on other paragraphs of that
795:
This discussion is a mess and lots of the arguments made here are comparing avocados to cucumbers. To start with, the source that none of us are able to see concerns the fraction of kids of the right age group who are attending school. That is quite different from the fraction of school kids who are
557:
No doubt this only proves I can't count, or transcribe a table that was difficult to read in the linked source. But the figures I get from Pollak, if I have transcribed them correctly, are =24.8 for Israeli secondary schoolers, two points higher than the the figure given by the Tumas-Drabkin source.
143:
The comparison is highly suspect for any time period, as it goes in the opposite direction to all available indicators of human capital and socioeconomics. Israel in the 1960s had a nuclear program and universities at the level of Western Europe, which does not happen in places where less than 1 in
2206:
So, Shrike, make a positive choice for once. Tagteam revert without looking at what you are doing, or, work according to wiki principles, rolling up your sleeves to familiarize yourself with the topic. Your record as an automatic supporter of anyone with the correct national POV is impeccable, but
2001:
is a complete fabrication. It repeatedly discusses the occupation of the West Bank and ties in these methods of control to the tactics Israel has exported to any number of human rights abusing countries. As far as "A rambling blog post from an anti-occupation activist is then used to back up claims
1922:. Even that permabanned editor couldn't find grounds to challenge the documentation, so he used a principle to ask that 'half' of the detail disappear. His view was accommodated. Now, with 3,500 edits and 1 and a half years' tenure, you are vigorously calling for a removal van to remove another 50%.
1887:
Actually this section reads like that. WP is not a forum for personal opinion. If you want to amend the article you are entitled to do so but you need to have valid reasons or consensus for substantial revisions to a sensitive article. I suggest we go one by one with your proposed revisions and see
1590:
Almost there. I used T-D-D. When questioned I ignored T-D-D and used Pollak. I didn't intend using the pomegranates of the 1 to be equal to the durians of the other. I inferred from Pollak's reproduction of the percentrages for Arab and Jewish Israelis what the ISB's table states. That the figures
1169:
The result, whatever way it goes, would affect 4 words. So let's wait, and not persist in un focused WP:TLDR opinionizing. If any other editor knows of a Wikipedian with competence in advanced statistics ready to carefully assess the evidence and sort it out, notify them. But external input of this
773:
Let's stick to Morris Pollak's figures. I have linked the source for you, you can independently verify there on p.20 if I have transcribed the table for schooling in Israel 1965-6 correctly. Then you can independently add up the figures and find out if my calculation above from Morris Pollak, which
727:
the source really makes the ridiculous claim, and that is a question you should be able to easily answer by reading the sections of the book immediately before and after the quoted part. If it does, it is a garbage source for any educational statistic about Israel and probably any place else. If,
674:
The actual idea is that when a hard to verify source makes an extraordinary, seemingly ridiculous claim, we don't take it at face value, and apply WP:ECREE. I did "go to a library", the online kind, to find other material which appears to conclusively refute what is now stated in the article. The
572:
I don't have any opinion on the broader discussion, but I think you might have made a few errors here; you need to omit the secondary students from the denominator in order to avoid double counting, and you need to adjust for the number of years students spend in secondary compared to pre-secondary
355:
The problem behind those statistics may reflect the fact that there were major differences in the two educational systems. The Jordanian system in the West Bank imposed a compulsory 12 years of education for the young, and it was free. In Israel in the 1960s, free government education was provided
199:
The source is impeccable - economists using Israeli, UN, and Jordanian official data. Your questioning of the eminently strong source is based on a set of hunches, clichĂŠs, personal opinions and generalizations out of nowhere, so I don't need to answer. By the way 'deleeet' orthographically should
2884:
In all cases when you address comments to another editor, you should identify who you are talking to and you should provide diffs or text snippets that identify which edits or parts of articles you are referring to. What you wrote here is meaningless otherwise. I might wish to comment, but I'm not
2702:
While I agree Awlaki is an edge case, it was still the chosen example, and as an example it actually serves to emphasize the dissimilarities of the US vs Israeli policies. As a further example, I will use your example-the killing of Suleimani. First I'll ask if you really think Trump ordering that
2503:
is perhaps true, but it certainly would be an economic benefit especially in the sections context which is based largely around data; I suggested it be it own subsection as it is proximate to the topic and would make the content more complete and not only on the *costs/loses. Further maybe some of
2328:
Again, what specific sources are you claiming are misused and exactly how? I for one am not very interested in personal views and I see zero in that entire response that actually discusses the sources or the article. What specifically are you challenging. Your edit summary only made vague waves to
1860:
The section then, once again refers to âmanyâ-who are actually just activists, claiming Bush Era US war on terror legal policy was based off/inspired by/used as "precedent" Israelâs, an example is then given of a controversial US policy from the Obama administration that specifically is completely
1856:
Iâll admit to speculating as to the motivation behind these edits, I canât say I know any editors motivation and apologize if I am wrong. Several of the errors in this section are clearly just sloppy editing (IE the US executive orders mentioned began in â76 not â77 or confusing Central with Latin
1708:
We have an explanation for figures from two highly respectable economists. It may, or may not, be correct.- At the outset you railed against the source without indicating anything other than your skepticism as a reason. The work is now being done to established the relevant statistics, via several
1627:
The only objection to your restatement is "some form of secondary school", which is not in the source. It only says "participation" which per the previous paragraph is "participation in education". Kids in this age group can be still attending primary school and in Israel at least we know this was
1560:
T&D-D are not presenting fractions of all students like you are. Proof: their percentages add up to more than 100%. For Israel they say 84.4% for 6-11 years and 22.8% for 15-17 years. That's already more than 100% even without 12-14 years. For WB it is even more stark: 80.5% for 6-11 years and
886:
On the topic of that source, I have been able to access it, and can confirm it is as Nishidani transcribed, and further that there is no other relevant context that could adjust the meaning. Incidentally, I would like to express my disappointment here; once they confirmed that they interpreted the
747:
The source is on its face reliable, and if youd like to challenge it then do that elsewhere. Youve now had multiple editors confirm the source says what the article says it says. You being unable to find the source on the internet is a personal problem, one that does not require anybody here to do
340:
The details of the educational level in the West Bank will, whatever the result of our research, remain a valid piece for the article. If the Israeli comparison proves to be inaccurate, that can be adjusted by other sources. We use comparison throughout for the simple reason that the article deals
325:
Let's drop silly branding language like 'partisan'. Elias Tuma comes from an Israeli Christian Arab background, and is emeritus professor of Economic History at Davis. Haim Darin-Drabkin, now deceased (1979) was a Jewish Israeli and Director of the Institute for Land Resource Planning in Tel Aviv.
169:
Just going from what is now in that section, Israel economy was 10 times the size of the West Bank's with only 4 times the population (2.8 M in 1967). So presumably about twice as wealthy in some quantifiable sense. The Israel population was predominantly Jewish immigrants, who in virtually every
94:
The statements comparing education levels of West Bank Palestinians and Israelis, quoting sources from 40 years ago, appear false on their face. The article says that 45 percent of Palestinian children in the West Bank but only half as many Israelis are enrolled in school at ages 15 to 17, despite
2717:
You are apparently missing my point despite my best efforts to explain it. The sentence does not say that Israeli decisions form any precedent for US actions, rather that the US claim that extraordinary circumstances in the War on Terror justify extraordinary legal claims has precedent in Israeli
2139:
If one does the latter, then it becomes almost immediately obvious that solid secondary sources state, numerously, what Halper remarked on, with his own angle, based on intimacy with the conflict. So if if one objected to him, the objection cannot be that what he is stating is controversial. I.e.
1852:
A prime example of this is the âWider Implicationsâ section. The opening, does not touch on the West Bank Occupation and is used to give an impression of Israel being an illogically militarized state. The quote, from the early 1980s, while accurately cited-the source outright states that Israel's
1604:
If that is the meaning, the adjustment is obvious. T.D-D are referring to two Arab populations, and to Jordan, stating that WB Arab youth in the 15-17 age bracket had much higher rates of secondary schooling than did their Arab youths of that age group in both Israel and Jordan. IF that is the
1210:
I must apologize. Your comments above show notable skill. I should have included your name in my prior post. Since I have included all the data from Pollak above, minutely calibrated according to categories, I would be curious to know what you make of his figures in terms of the percentage of the
1137:
Look, I will go where the evidence goes. This thread is becoming garbled because of extensive argufying The one editor here who has, from past experience here, advanced computing abilities (that is a fair assumption, correct me if I am wrong), is Zero. He is also known for correcting any error no
986:
accuracy of his quotation was not in doubt. If you are saying there is no way to tell if they are talking about Arabs or all Israelis (or worse, that they specify the latter) that would be utterly astonishing; any resident of Israel would know that 23 percent is a whopping underestimate, and the
944:
This is all irrelevant to the dispute about the source in the article. Calculations from other tabulations in other secondary sources cannot possibly refute Kleinberger's numbers because their data are drawn from the same place as his. Nobody has enumerated the exact national school enrollments
697:
It's not hard to verify. I have a copy. An enormous quantity of RS are not online. Of course if you think I am a liar, deliberately distorting the book's content, I can't answer that. I've provided the precise data in English for Israeli education in the year 1965-6, with a further source. I have
112:
The sources for the strangely low percentages of Israeli school attendance are not online and if there is no way to verify what is really said there and extract the correct data, the claims should be removed. The Palestinian data could be correct, but if the sources do make the ridiculous claims
2498:
Well seeing as the section I propose moving this content too is titled "Economic and social benefits and costs of the occupation", it would seem a perfect place for it. The state financial subsidies Israeli settlers receive are cataloged as are Israel's economic loses altogether, both direct and
2488:
If other editors agree on retaining the content regarding the profitable R&D-commercial export industry Israel has developed largely via occupying the West Bank for generations, then I ask why isnât it in the "Costs" section?.' Because a thriving and profitable export industry isn't strictly
1576:
Israeli students is incompatible with Pollak and impossible. The exact value of 22.8% for Israeli Arabs in 1966/7 cited by Sesquivalent above from the book of Kleinberger (who cites it to the Statistical Abstract of Israel for 1967) is a much better explanation for where T&D-D got the figure
1354:
BilledMammal also correctly pointed out that you are not calculating the Jewish figure properly. I'll take your numbers as correct: total in school = 660,541, total in secondary school = 163,796. Then you divided 163796/660541. But why? That is not the fraction of students who go on to secondary
967:
While here, I will note that I think Kleinberger has been misinterpreted; their figures for the education rates of secondary-age Arab-Israeli's include both those in secondary education, and those in primary education; the figure for secondary would appear to be 228 less 76, or 152 out of 1000.
193:
In comparison with both Israel and Jordan, the West bank and Gaza seem to have a favourable educational basis. The age group 6-11 shows a higher participation rate in Israel (84,4) than in the West Bank (80,5) but, in the group 15-17 years of age, the percentage in the West Bank is considerably
2861:
I also need to address how you grossly misrepresent sources, massively select oriented sources, and that, systematically without providing contradictory sources. Very often selecting specific quotes, that are then oriented and added in a text filled with critical stances. For neutrality I need
2308:
Israel only felt threatened 40 years ago. I'd suggest you read the Israeli press, as I have done, closely, for the last 15 years. I read widely over a decade and a half the scholarly literature on the occupation, and, when asked to write a summation of a topic not comprehensively dealt with on
1864:
If other editors agree on retaining the content regarding the profitable R&D-commercial export industry Israel has developed largely via occupying the West Bank for generations, then I ask why isnât it in the "Costs" section? The section includes a subsection discussing the indirect losses
1677:
This is all rescuing a dodgy source when better ones exist just because of their pro Palestinian statement on "favourable educational basis", which is also part of a constructed narrative. If we just want to give figures objectively comparing WB or WB+G to Jordan or Israeli Arabs we can do it
1344:
level" (my emphasis). If you put that 12,638 in the primary column instead, a completely different picture emerges. More importantly, you are still trying to calculate the fraction of all students who are in secondary school, which is an entirely different statistic from what T&DD present.
948:
The issue, once again, is whether Tuma and Drabkin in their book state or imply that the 22.8% number, and thus their "favourable basis" comparison, pertains to Israeli Arabs and not Israelis in general. We know that it must be so from Kleinberger's data, but cannot use his book to "cure" the
926:
Nish, I think that you missed a datum in Pollak that is directly comparable. At the start of page 20: "During the period 1963â64, 27 percent of the secondary age group (14 to 18) attended schools at this level. However, 33 percent of this age group were in the primary grades of the schools for
576:
However, these figures also cannot be relied on, as I think there are a few misclassified institutions. "Other institutions" include both primary and secondary for both Jewish Israeli's and Arab Israeli's, and so cannot be applied to either. Schools for "Working youth" are applied to secondary
1426:
If you can therefore bear with me. My procedure was this. I put aside the bare figures in T-D and examined the actual Israeli Statistics faithfully reproduced in another source, Pollak p.20. I am perplexed that high caliber economists can prove as stupid as I am in a discipline where they are
1868:
A rambling blog post from an anti-occupation activist is then used to back up claims of US cops being trained to treat Americans like Israel treats Palestinians. The insinuation and claims here concern me less bc theyâre so outright false theyâd never survive ANI but should be noted as their
1996:
What specific source do you claim is used out of context. The rest of that screed is personal opinion and does not concern me. But what, specifically, do you claim is not supported? Because the Pietrese source does indeed discuss the occupation of the West Bank, directly, and the claim that
1902:
The page documents an occupation, according to impeccable sources by scholars who analyse those historical realities. Any occupation, enduring relentless for 74 years, that appears to consist in an incremental landgrab by force of arms, will not be a rosy picture. This goes for the Chinese
1244:
I know it's confusing. But Pollak does reproduce the yearbook, and a simple calculation of student populations in secondary schools just on that is, I think, possible (excluding the 15-17 issue) The larger questions, like what is the proportion of the school populatios to the overall youth
2746:
I am at least trying too understand, I apologize if we keep missing each other Iâve tried to soften my tone here. Israelâs idea of âextraordinary circumstancesâ is their occupation lasted longer than anyone anticipated, leaving them as the worlds last true colonial state, thereâs nothing
2601:
You are arguing against the text as we have it, built on RS, by generic claims which look like personal opinions. I won't be replying to challenges based on opinions, but only queries which adduce in counter-evidence equally reliable sources on the context not yet examined or used. Only
1564:
Given that T&D-D's percentages add to more than 100%, what do they mean? I think that's clear, though I didn't think so on the first reading. The percentages are for "participation in education", which I take to mean "going to school". So, what T&D-D say about 15-17 year olds is:
945:
except the Israeli government, which published it in only one or two places, so if Kleinberger has copied those figures into his book, that is authoritative (barring typos), and no calculations on other pieces of the same data set are going to reach dramatically different conclusions.
1925:'an editor seeking to push anti-Israeli sentiment.' There we go again. First the sourcdes are written by 'anti-Israeli activists' and then the composing editors are branded as pushers of 'anti-Israeli sentiment'. The usual hasbara anti-Semitic insinuation when one hasn't an argument.
492:
I suspect that this official Israeli data breakdown is the basis for the statistics we find in Tumas and Darin-Drabkin. Someone better at math than I can check those statistics against the above. The word 'number' for me usually refers to my state of mind after I've had several
558:
Even with my liability to error, the calculations happen to arrive at a similar figure. The divergence, if correct, can be explained as a transcription error of dittography, very frequent, writing 22 for 24.The .8% indicates that we are dealing with the same source figure base.
1082:(including 27 per cent who are still in primary education), and that approximately 82 per cent are in full-time attendance, while the remaining 10 per cent are enrolled in part-time schools (schools for working youth, secondary evening schools, apprenticeship schools, etc.)."
1225:
Unfortunately, I'm not comfortable producing any specific percentages; so many assumptions would be required that I feel anything I produce would be little better than a guess. However, Pollak does also contain this paragraph; perhaps it will help on that broader question?:
1100:
Tuma and Drabkin of course also drew their numbers from the Statistical Abstracts of Israel. Nishidani said this source is listed p.123 of their book; the only remaining question (to ask it is to answer it) is whether it is page 536 of the 18th edition published 1967.
1427:
competent and I utterly nescient. I obtained from Pollak the following. I want to ascertain why T-D got their percentage of 22.8 wrong. My assumption is that T-D, in specifying 15-17 are obviously using additional sources, other than the Israeli Stats Pollak gives.
949:
Tuma/Drabkin source so as to SYNTH a correct claim using their language (which would be disinformation and no longer RS if two Israelis in a position to know better really made the crazy assertion that West Bank rates of high school attendance were twice Israel's).
1096:
As noted earlier, this is the other figure, 22.8%, that the article erroneously assigns to "Israelis" rather than Israeli Arabs. The source is the same page of the same edition of the Israel government statistical abstract, as the 84.4% given for primary school.
2552:(eg al-Awlaki). The sentence only says that the American claim was that this unprecedented situation called for a whole new understanding of what is legal echoed the Israeli claim that the "war on terror" in the WB likewise created a need for a new legal arena.
584:
To pull a single number out of all of this would require more assumptions than I am comfortable making, but perhaps someone better versed in education in the country and the relevant period would be able to do so? In any case, I hope this will prove helpful.
218:, and does not gain in plausibility when you are vague about what else the book says and the location of those prior Talk discussions where the matter was supposedly settled. What is this mysterious "participation rate" they speak of and how is it measured?
315:
I think that comparison of Arab to Jewish students is at most marginally relevant, but a comparison of Arab students inside and outside the Green Line is highly relevant. Figures for around the time of the occupation and modern figures would both be good.
878:
I've reviewed the interpretation of Pollack's figures above and found a few issues with the calculations, but I am hesitant to produce my own answer as the number of assumptions required would make it very inaccurate. If it helps, I have found this from
128:
Excuse me, but you should repass tenses in the English verb system. The data and context refer to the 1960s. The book states that compared to both Israel and Jordan, the West Bank and Gaza had more students going on to study in the 15-17 year old group.
1561:
44.6% for 15-17 years, total 125.1%. But in your case, fraction in primary school + fraction in secondary school cannot exceed 100%. So it isn't a matter of having extra information; it is a matter of you and T&D-D calculating incomparable things.
580:
I also believe that adults are included outside of the post-secondary institutions; vocational education is stated to include some 1000 adults at ASC alone, mostly in the evening - this would also suggest that "secondary evening" consists entirely of
1154:
Zero, on the basis of ongoing further source-analysis, thinks, unless I am mistaken, that Tuma, Darion-Drabkin and Pollak, all competent statisticians/economists, have erred re Israel, and he adds that the Jordanian statistic requires qualification
282:
The Kleinberger book (p.197) says "school attendance rates per every 1000 Arab adolescents aged 14-17 in 1966/7 were as low as 228 (including 76 in primary education)-- as compared with 620 per every 1000 Jews of corresponding age", which does equal
612:
Imagine a school system that is balanced in the number of secondary and pre-secondary years; if all students proceed from pre-secondary to secondary, we would expect to receive a figure of 100%, but using the method above we would only receive 50%.
2526:
The American claim that new methods developed for the war on terror were necessary since the situation was unprecedented and therefore was a legal no man's land had a precedent in Israeli claims the war on terror in the West Bank was a legal terra
1339:
You made a mistake by including 12,638 for "other institutions" in Arab secondary schools. The footnote says "in the Arab education system, 'other institutions' include nongovernmental private schools, with one or two exceptions, nearly all at the
1324:
is for Biblical exegesis. We need to remember that we are challenging three competent economists and statisticians by recourse to independent research on primary texts (which they were familiar with), a very tricky thing in terms of Wiki practise.
1305:
1965-1966 reproduced in Pollak, it would appear that 20.36% of Israeli Arab students went on to secondary schooling, and 24.8% of Israeli Jewish students attended forms of secondary schooling. The latter figure is also close to T-D's figure.
1118:
Incorrect. Tuma and Drabkin drew their information from the Statistical Abstract you mention (and from which Pollak cites - I note you waive aside my invitation to analyse Pollak's material, which appears to confirm roughly the T-D percentage)
1807:
Yes, there is related material in the lead. I likewise think how college students in the US and Europe feel is of 0 importance to this article, which is why I ditched that bit. At the very least, this should be drawn down considerably imo.
330:, as we know, even experts nod at times, and when they do appear to do so, we search for very good sources that deal with the same crux, and yield different results. Until we have ascertained a superior source, we retain the original text.
2365:
If you would like to continue your pissing match with Nishidani kindly do it elsewhere. Assuming you mean "Mintz", as that is who is cited, what exactly are you challenging? What would like to add from that source, exactly? Remove? Why?
187:
You are asking me to confirm a citation of data already questioned by editors in the past, who were surprised by the data, but accepted that the source was way above the RS quality high bar. I think I even quoted a paragraph. Here it is
1645:
in the WB 44.6% of Palestinians participated in some form of secondary education, higher than Jordan (Footnote? for Israeli Arabs, the corresponding figure has been claimed to be 22.8%?. Linked ref to Pollak and Kleinberg with a prĂŠcis
836:
I provided a secondary source, Pollak, who worked for the US Bureau of Labour, with full transcription of his table, which is based upon the Statistical Abstract of Israel 1966, Central Bureau of Statistics (Israel) Jerusalem 1966
300:
Of course what Kleinberger didn't know, is that the Shin Bet director from 1953-1963 advised the government that an educated Israeli Arab was a dangerous thing, and low education was a net positive for Israel's internal security.
847:
I am aware statistics can be questioned, though here three experts who differ by a margin of 2 percentage points (which does not alter the contrast in profile of 22.8/24.8% for the latter compared to 44.6 for WB 15.17 year old
1060:(p.319) "The various measures taken by the authorities, together with the progressive economic and social modernization of the rural Arab population, are gradually improving the educational opportunities and attainments of the
883:. It's not perfect; it starts in '73, and it is gross, not net, so it will include adult students studying at a secondary level, but it might be useful to indicate whether Tuma and Darin-Drabkin made a mistake or not.
2819:
Milena Sterio, The United States' Use of Drones in the War on Terror: The (Il)legality of Targeted Killings under International Law, 45 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 197 (2012). pages 199-200. Retrieved November 2, 2021.
95:
slightly higher Israeli enrollment at earlier ages. This makes absolutely no sense considering the university attendance rates, per capita incomes, literacy and economic development levels of the two populations.
1909:'viewpoint pushing of pro-Palestinian activists' Yeah, sure. Several hundred tenured scholars, half of them working in Israeli higher institutions of learning, are dismissed as 'pro-Palestinian activists'. Yawn.
2543:
The policies and methods and legal underpinnings of insurgency suppression that the US advanced were, according to sources, ones developed by Israel in its occupation of the Palestinian territories. For example
1004:
To be (hopefully) clear: Above, Nishidani quotes a paragraph from the book. That quote is accurate, and the surrounding paragraphs provide no additional information or context on the topic of Israeli education
856:
A further point is that Tumas-Drabkin isolate a specific age group 15-17, whereas Pollak's figures refer not to age, but to school type, so they probably had access to another source using age as a criterion
1942:. Compare the superpowers, U.S.A. (3.7%), China (1.7%), Russian Federation (4.3%). The world average is 2.4%. Israel comes 2nd in the world after the banana monarchy Saudi Arabia (8.4%). These are the facts.
1960:'The section then, once again refers to âmanyâ-who are actually just activists'. No. They are scholars, five of them. When 5 (any many more could be added) sources state something, 'many' is normal summary.
1228:
During this period 1963-64, 26 percent of the secondary age group (14 to 18) attended schools at level. However, 33 percent of this age group were in the primary grades of the schools for "working youth."
675:
only remaining issue is whether the bogus material was in the disputed source at all, i.e., does the book (written by two Israelis, who would know well the true facts) really assert that 23 percent of
2304:
Sure. But I gave up going to confession60 years ago and haven't carried on the habit into my pagan maturity. Nice to see that you admit the Palestinians are 'mistreated' by Israel. Nice to hear that,
1951:'it is nonsense to label the IDFâs oppressive West Bank police state forces as experienced in urban warfare.' Of course, you are an expert, and your opinion therefore overrides what the sources state.
1912:'individuals rhetoric as though fact'. The page is short of viewpoints. Facts are given. Rarely, some flaw may emerge (as in the preceding section, and when that is verified, the text is duly emended.
1008:
In regards to the Kleinberger figures I was mistaken; I thought we were discussing 15-17 year olds in secondary school, but we were discussing 15-17 year olds in school (both primary and secondary).
1271:
has many tables related to years of study. (Search for "study".) I didn't find T&DD's figure of 44.6% for 15â17 exactly but I found enough to tell me that the figure is plausible. For example,
2050:(Halper is being cited, not Mondoweiss, and Halper is authoritative in this area. And if you dislike him, I can replace the same statement with a dozen impeccable sources. All you need do is ask.
2996:
other typical issues : 1. Massively selecting oriented sources 2. Underrepresentation of contrary points of view, especially here the Israeli one. 3. issue with the structure of the arguments.--
2276:
things like the Alon Plan should be discussed without mentioning Syria and the perceived or claimed necessity for a cunctatory buffer zone between Israel proper and the Arab threat to the East
1970:
at Mondoweiss is not writing a blog, and he isn't a blogger. The piece has numerous citations from the press attesting to that nexus. One could add a dozen sources arguing the same viewpoint (
1572:
In conclusion, that fact that you can find a calculation which produces a number similar to 22.8% is an accident. It is not confirmation of T&D-D. On the contrary, a value of 22.8% for
3030:
1517:
But you tell me the figure 14,682 for Israeli Arabs in secondary education is flawed, and one one must subtract 12638 more or less (most) from that total. Accepting this premise one gets
599:
To get a percentage the denominator has to include everything, including what is in the numerator. That is not double-counting. Otherwise the percentages will add up to more than 100%.
1577:
from. It's not even a contradiction, since T&D-D don't say it is for all Israelis; we just have to assume some lack of clarity on their part. (The same source gives 62% for Jews.)
1915:'sources . .by no stretch of the imagination would qualify to wiki standards'. Oh really? So of the 325+ sources what percentage qualify as abuses of our best RS quality standards?
2266:, we can skip almost all of 1-7, pretty much just a tirade broadly defending the entire article (but thank you for immediately conforming to the description in my opening). But (1)
1979:
In short, all I for one have learned by the rambling tirade above is that 1976 should be 1977, and a distinction should be observed in the text between Central and Latin America.
2578:'Costs' vs 'Wider Implications'. Costs deal with Israel/Palestine, wider implications deal with the extension of the Israeli occupational model, its technologies etc., abroad.
728:
as is probable, the book does say or imply that the numbers pertain to Israeli Arabs, then source is OK, but the language about all of Israel and all Israelis must be changed.
683:
but it seems just as inconceivable that the authors didn't make this distinction as that they claimed Israel has half the secondary education rate of the West Bank (pre 67).
2449:
I apologize. I am glad we found some common ground. I have said enough on this issue, made my stance clear-how do you suggest resolving/removing the of the Mintz citation?
81:
69:
64:
59:
2207:
is beginning to be tiresome. A blanket revert with a false edit summary is sanctionable. Particularly. as you appear to do so often, to 'back' a newbie's dubious reverts.
1966:'A rambling blog post from an anti-occupation activist is then used to back up claims of US cops being trained to treat Americans like Israel treats Palestinians.' Nope.
2862:
dialecticism, or at least coherence in that mash-up. That was not part of my edit, which was essentially about intellectual honesty when you quote or present sources.--
2658:
assassinations of non-combatants and the justifications offered for them. But thats besides the point, the point there is about claimed novel and extreme threat -: -->
362:
Of these Jewish students 85,541 were in kindergarten,395,901 in primary school; 11,316 were in special schools for handicapped kids, and 4,374 were for working youth.
232:(1969, Pergamon Press) by Aaron F. Kleinberger, education professor at Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The data are cited to: (Israel's) Central Bureau of Statistics,
2993:
in a bus when children usually use it to go back home, how the hell this quote is relevant ("not the primary targets"). There is a need to be critical of their work.
2619:
I think its fair to request the sourcing for that tie it to the occupation explicitly, otherwise we have a synth issue. The rest of the removals remain inexplicable.
266:
sources. The source in the article is more than 40 years old and Sesquivalent's sources are even older. Much has changed in 40 years. There is recent data for Israel
864:
I asked for Pollak's figures to be reviewed, because they yield a statistically marginal difference to those provided by Tumas.Drabkin. No one has replied so far.
1865:
incurred by Israel from the occupation; the aforementioned military industrial commercial industry should be in the costs section arguably as "indirect gains".
1974:) etc. That thousands of American police have undergone training with Israeli police who spend much of their time on occupational enforcement is not disputed.
2183:
2003:
1138:
matter from whatever POV angle it might be coming from. Whatever he decides is fine by me. In the end we are talking about just the following bolded words :-
840:
An analysis of Pollak showed that he gave the figure of 24.8% for Israeli Jewish secondary schoolers. This source is linked. It is reliably published by the
931:
and it is possible to see where those numbers come from. Unfortunately, they come from a misreading of the table. First the adults who had attended school
158:
A search for the insertion of those numbers in the article, shows that... you wrote the entire article, including the paragraph in question, and have made
573:
education (4:9, per your source) - applying these modifications to your figures gives a result of 74.8% for Jewish Israeli's and 57.5% for Arab Israeli's.
2545:
1939:
2078:
You removed considerably more than Halper, and ONUS does not allow for an editor to remove material that very much has consensus given it has stood for
1903:
occupation of Tibet or of the Uyghurs etc. To gloss over the realities in deference to some extreme sensitivity to Israel's image is beside the point.
829:
I responded by transcribing the source which is written by competent economists, and reliably published. I have a copy of the said work, published by
817:
The text has a source by two Israeli economists who made an age group comparison of school attendance for 15-17 year olds in Israel and the West Bank.
1569:. T&D-D give a percentage of all youths in that age group, you give a percentage of all school students at all levels. Pomegranates and durians.
1193:
841:
486:
47:
17:
1599:
in WB 44.6% of them (Palestinians) go to some form of secondary school, in Israel 22.8% of them (Israeli Arabs) go to some form of secondary school
2248:
To think I briefly considered that maybe I was totally unfair characterizing a bias in many of this page's frequent editors.....But I'll concede
1071:
That matches the 84.4% figure taken from Tuma and Drabkin, removing any further possibility of doubt that their numbers are for Arabs. Source is
333:
We can't incidentally query Darin-Drabkin, but we can certainly try to drop a brief line to the much younger Elias Tuma (his email is available
653:
The idea that because one is unable to find a source online that makes it so that the material is questionable is directly contradicted by our
286:
I too do not see the use of highlighting West Bank education rates pre 1967. And comparing them to Israel seems irrelevant to the article.
2178:
1456:
660,938 +72,096 = 733034 total enrolment in Israeli schools (Arab Jewish) 1965-1966 per the Israeli Bureau of Statistics table in Pollak p.20
267:
1605:
case, then I can tweak the text. If the 15-17 Israeli Jewish age bracket participation has been figured out, I can add that in a footnote?
826:
was attacked as per se outrageous (22.8%), at first, without any contra-evidential basis, then on the basis of inferences from Kleinberger.
2006:
2299:
you've pretty much confessed to using this page to air any/all grievances against Israel for their mistreatment of the Palestinians, ever
887:
source correctly, that should have been the end of that line of discussion; if there were further doubts, the right place to go would be
270:
but it is hard to interpret and I don't see anything about the West Bank. Probably the West Bank is covered by UN sources pretty well.
2329:
supposed unreliable sources and the one in particular you referenced, Halper in Mondoweiss, is used with as an attributed view from a
1918:'half of this has no business regardless being on this specific page.' We cut the text down by half to meet Icewhiz's obsessions with
1824:
I'd go along with a bit of tightening up, I do hope there are some college students left that take an interest in these things:)
731:
No special competence is needed except for you to look at the book and tell us, or quote, the answer to this simple question.
2064:
I have self reverted go ahead and bring better source then mondoweiss there are also Kattenburg that sourced to this blog.
1935:
1036:(p.316) Rates of post-primary school attendance per every 1000 persons aged 14-17 in the various origin groups (1965/6):
804:
are 1967 statistics collected by Israel. Note that it refers to what education adults had, not what kids were in school.
2840:
679:
go beyond primary school in the 1960s? It does look like we pinpointed the source of their number and that it's about
1556:
If I claim there are 228 pomegranates and you calculate there are 226 durians, does that mean you confirmed my claim?
2024:
Jeff Halper printed on Mondoweiss couldn't be considered a reliable source to this topic and his views are clearly
2192:
1971:
1954:
IF '76 should be '77' depending on sources, is an error, a simple edit, once the assertion is verified, can fix it.
38:
2131::::Shrike, like any other objecting editor here can do two things. (a) the default POV-pusher reverting on sight
3005:
2979:
2963:
2947:
2931:
2909:
2889:
2871:
2851:
2795:
2785:
that has echoes in Israeli arguments about the way it has created the legal regime underpinning the occupation.
2756:
2728:
2712:
2669:
2652:
2629:
2614:
2587:
2562:
2538:
2513:
2458:
2420:
2403:
2376:
2359:
2343:
2318:
2287:
2231:
2216:
2122:
2096:
2073:
2059:
2041:
2018:
2002:
of US cops being trained to treat Americans like Israel treats Palestinians", that isnt exactly in dispute. See
1988:
1897:
1878:
1833:
1818:
1799:
1783:
1768:
1752:
1722:
1687:
1661:
1632:
1614:
1581:
1538:
1359:
1349:
1334:
1314:
1292:
1280:
1254:
1239:
1220:
1205:
1179:
1132:
1110:
1017:
999:
977:
958:
939:
918:
900:
873:
808:
783:
762:
740:
707:
692:
667:
631:
622:
603:
594:
567:
502:
350:
320:
310:
295:
274:
253:
209:
182:
153:
138:
122:
2548:
while not actively on the field of battle (meaning a combatant) is echoed in such things as the US policies on
2171:
2222:
Struck out above comment since, edit conflict, Shrike had already reverted on Selfstudier's advice. Thank you.
1857:
America, though such mistakes tend to run with editing not meant to be encyclopedic but instead to POV push.
1170:
kind will not be effective if they have to trawl through an immense distracting and messy screed of talking.
820:
The source of their information was The Statistical Abstracts of the State of Israel (Tuma and Drabkin p.123)
475:
And 12,638 Arab students received some secondary formation in other institutions for which no data was known.
1936:
Israel's median military expenditure as a percentage of GNP over the last decade has varied from 5.9 to 5.6%
1211:
Israeli Jewish and Israel Arab population in secondary schools (regardless of 15-17)? Perhaps I missed it.
2196:
1683:
1235:
1201:
1106:
1013:
995:
973:
954:
896:
736:
688:
654:
618:
590:
291:
249:
178:
149:
118:
657:. If you cant find the source online, go to a library. Nobody needs to make that effort for you however.
2186:
2118:
1893:
1829:
1764:
1231:
1197:
1009:
969:
928:
892:
801:
770:
I quoted, at your request the relevant section, and you are still repeating you cannot verify it, ergo?
614:
586:
411:
There were 22,335 students attending higher education course in schools for which data was unavailable
2184:'With Whom are Many U.S. Police Departments Training With a Chronic Human Rights Violator? â Israel,'
1093:(including 76 in primary education)â as compared with 620 per every 1000 Jews of corresponding age."
3001:
2959:
2927:
2901:
I also see that you posted the same thing to three(!) user talk pages. Don't do that. Learn how to
2867:
2748:
2704:
2644:
2610:
2583:
2530:
2505:
2450:
2395:
2351:
2314:
2279:
2227:
2212:
2055:
1984:
1870:
1779:
1718:
1657:
1610:
1534:
1330:
1310:
1250:
1216:
1175:
1128:
869:
779:
703:
563:
498:
346:
306:
205:
134:
98:
1888:
where that gets us, of course you are free meanwhile to take any disputed source to RSP (not ANI).
1485:
14,682 (Arab)+163,796 (Jewish) = 178,478 total enrolment in what were defined as secondary schools
1285:
1272:
2972:
2940:
2902:
2788:
2752:
2721:
2708:
2662:
2648:
2622:
2555:
2549:
2534:
2509:
2454:
2413:
2399:
2369:
2355:
2336:
2283:
2089:
2011:
1874:
1811:
1792:
1745:
911:
755:
660:
880:
2193:'Deadly Exchange: The Dangerous Consequences of American Law Enforcement Trainings in Israel,'
2175:
2166:
1679:
1102:
991:
950:
732:
684:
287:
245:
174:
145:
114:
2833:
481:
2836:
2605:
I am reading 11 new sources relevant to the above dispute. My usual practice. I work slowly.
2249:
2114:
2069:
2037:
1889:
1825:
1760:
1710:
982:
Nishidani didn't say whether the book specifies Arabs or Israelis (or is ambiguous) and the
1999:
The source does not mention Israelâs occupation of the West Bank even once even, indirectly
2025:
748:
anything to help you solve. There had, up until this rant, been no mention of a ZOG, or a
244:, 18 (1967),532 . The estimated number in non inspected schools appears on p.196 and 197.
215:
2937:
The previous message is incomprehensible as it relates to our article and our policies.
1121:
and from other sources- 50 books, numerous periodicals, specialist bulletins, UN reports
2997:
2955:
2923:
2896:
2879:
2863:
2606:
2579:
2482:
2310:
2263:
2223:
2208:
2051:
2029:
1980:
1775:
1714:
1653:
1606:
1530:
1365:
1326:
1306:
1246:
1212:
1185:
1171:
1124:
1078:(p.196) "even today, when post-primary education is neither free nor compulsory, about
865:
775:
699:
559:
494:
342:
302:
201:
130:
90:
Education data are impossible. Less than 1 in 4 Israelis continue school after age 14?
1123:
since that 1966 SA source doesn't supply the evidence for (a)the West Bank and Jordan.
2917:
2906:
2886:
2885:
prepared to search the article history in order to guess what you are talking about.
2693:
2444:
2388:
1919:
1629:
1578:
1356:
1346:
1321:
1289:
1277:
936:
805:
797:
628:
600:
317:
271:
163:
1268:
2767:
1159:
1062:
non-Jewish minority. Rates of primary school attendance per 1000 children aged 6-13
888:
1713:
in the north and south of Israel are virtually debarred from higher education.'
1529:
That 22.62% from Pollak's reproduced ISBureau table is very close to T-D's 22.8%.
1520:
Total enrolment in Israeli secondary schools (ignoring ethnicity) would have been
2845:
2602:
counter-arguments based on sources, linked or cited, get my undivided attention.
2330:
2108:
2083:
2065:
2033:
1967:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1143:
with 44.6% of West Bank teenagers in the 15â17 year bracket frequenting school
2162:
830:
1591:
are similar is perhaps wholly coincidental. I dunno. I take your word for it.
334:
472:
1 other type of school for secondary education existed for some 33 students
2501:
a thriving and profitable export industry isn't strictly speaking a 'cost'
964:
page, and if you need a third opinion I'm sure they can also confirm this.
2082:
and then claim their assent is required to restore. Stop doing that. And
1934:'to give an impression of Israel being an illogically militarized state.'
2905:
other editors and use that to notify them of text you want them to see.
861:
But we are challenging two standard RS sources by 3 competent analysts.
507:
All I can get from this, if I have transcribed the figures corrected is
415:
359:
There were in 1965-1966 660,938 Jewish students vs 72,096 Arab students
2272:
The usual hasbara anti-Semitic insinuation when one hasn't an argument
1567:
in WB 44.6% of them go to school, in Israel 22.8% of them go to school
2410:
Kindly stop with the personal comments. But I'm fine removing Mintz.
445:
There were for Arab Israelis 353 schools catering to 72,096 students
1188:; re: Pollak; Zero and I have had a little conversation above (I've
3021:
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a
469:
There was 1 teacher's training college with 143 students enrolled.
419:
1364:
Thanks indeed Z. I know this must be trying for you, a bit like
1869:
continued presence, especially in current form is problematic.
1594:
You state then that of 15-17 year olds T.D-D's statement means:
390:
49,628 students enrolled in 167 schools (out of 4,627 overall);
1906:'misrepresented to create false context'. What is the context?
906:
once they confirmed that they interpreted the source correctly
393:
21 schools with a secondary evening system for, 2,456 students
101:
page says Israel has compulsory education through 12th grade,
25:
396:
129 schools providing continuation classes for 6,554 students
194:
higher than in Israel, 44,6 compared to 22.8 in Israel.' p.48
2774:
absent a source linking them. What the source here says is:
551:
49628+ 2456+ 6554+31239+10951+10542+1422+22335+28669=163796
2922:, can you read the previous message? Thank you so much --
2829:
Interesting new article on the legality of the occupation
1368:
trying to teach orthography to a dyslexic kiddie in bubs.
1064:
rose from 804 (900 for boys, 699 for girls) in 1961/2 to
851:
I noted one possible problem, now Zero highlights, that:-
460:
8 secondary schools provided education for 1,558 students
337:. I myself can't use it since I don't have outlook. Zero?
2168:
Our American Israel: The Story of an Entangled Alliance,
113:
about the Israeli numbers, they are unreliable anyway.
2772:
every other nation citing "extraordinary circumstances"
1957:
Latin America/Central America. That too is an easy fix.
2766:
is that because the source compares them. It would be
408:
There were 57 other secondary schools fo1,422 students
2659:
novel and extreme legal justifications on both ends.
1523:
163,796 (Israeli Jewish)+2044 (Israeli Arab) =165,840
891:
to ask a third party to have a look at the document.
326:
The source is excellent, the credentials impeccable.
2113:
What Nishidani said, this is not a good look at all.
1080:
92 per cent of the Jewish 14-year-olds are at school
1885:
At times this page reads more like a partisan essay
1759:
There is some related in the lead, the second para.
2252:'s point, maybe I should've been more diplomatic.
1166:on Knowledge know better than two strong sources.
414:And 28,669 registered at other institutions (i.e.
341:with an occupying power, and an occupied people.
2489:speaking a 'cost', except to Israel's democracy.
2268:Any occupation, enduring relentless for 74 years
2086:is perfectly acceptable for an attributed view.
1151:In another source, that 22.8% comes out as 24.8.
1085:(p.197) "School attendance rates per every 1000
466:1 provided agricultural training for 93 students
405:56 teacher training colleges for 10,542 students
1048:41.2% Jews born in Israel of Oriental parentage
1042:71.4% Jews born in Israel of European parentage
2546:Israel targeting what it claims are terrorists
448:I51 provided kindergarten care for 7,845 kids
1162:because we have to show they screwed up, and
8:
1652:I'm thinking of something along those lines.
1526:165,840 as a percentage of 733,034 =22.623%.
1488:178,478 as a percentage of 733,034 = 24.347%
451:181 were primary schools for 49,349 students
1068:(921 for boys, 760 for girls) in 1966/7."
463:4 gave vocational training to 217 students
402:28 agricultural schools catering for 10,951
399:187 vocational schools with 31,239 students
1940:List of countries by military expenditures
1288:is a more detailed table for WB in 1967.
105:attain a secondary schooling diploma and
1158:This requires patience and delicacy per
842:United States Bureau of Labor Statistics
609:education out of all 15 to 17 year olds.
515:Israeli Arabs in school . Total = 72,096
487:United States Bureau of Labor Statistics
18:Talk:Israeli occupation of the West Bank
2812:
2135:(b) you see a queried text, google and
1774:description of what takes place there.
554:163796 as a percentage of 660541 =24.8%
545:Israeli Jews in school. Total = 660,541
457:5 schools catered to 213 working youths
230:Society, Schools and Progress in Israel
2525:
2500:
2487:
2275:
2271:
2267:
1884:
1227:
524:14682 as a percentage of 72096 =20.36%
454:1 school existed for 7 handicapped kid
422:etc.) for which no data was available.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1045:51.9% Jews born in Europe and America
521:12638+ 1558+217+ 93 + 143+ 33=14,682
214:The source is partisan, the claim is
7:
908:*ding ding ding, we have a winner*.
236:(in Hebrew), No. 10 (1965), 245-46;
3009:
2762:The reason we include this and not
844:. Anyone should be able to read it.
1051:28.9% Jews born in Asia and Africa
723:So the point now is to understand
518:Israeli Arabs in secondary schools
234:Bulletin of Educational Statistics
24:
2262:I'll try and go bullet by bullet
548:Israeli Jews in secondary schools
483:Labor Law and Practice in Israel,
29:
2032:on those who want to include --
1196:) that you might want to read.
3015:<ref group=lower-alpha: -->
1073:Statistical Abstract of Israel
238:Statistical Abstract of Israel
1:
3023:{{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
800:06:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
712:Discussion thus far is about
228:Source is Table 6, p. 198 of
2796:16:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
2757:00:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
2729:23:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
2713:22:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
2670:20:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
2653:06:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
2630:14:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
2615:14:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
2588:08:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
2563:19:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
2539:23:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2514:23:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2459:23:57, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2421:23:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2404:22:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2377:22:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2360:22:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2344:21:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2319:21:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2288:19:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2232:16:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2217:16:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2123:15:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2097:15:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2074:15:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2060:15:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2042:14:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
2019:14:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
1989:10:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
1898:10:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
1879:07:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
1834:19:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
1819:19:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
1800:19:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
1784:16:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
1769:15:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
1753:15:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
1723:17:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
1688:03:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
1662:17:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
1633:02:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
1615:16:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1582:13:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1539:12:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1360:11:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1350:09:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1335:07:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1315:07:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1293:03:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1281:01:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
1255:19:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1240:16:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1221:14:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1206:14:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1180:14:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1133:14:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1111:13:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1018:14:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1000:13:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
978:12:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
959:12:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
940:11:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
919:14:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
901:11:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
874:08:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
809:06:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
784:20:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
763:14:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
741:20:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
708:19:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
693:19:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
668:19:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
632:11:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
623:11:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
604:10:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
595:07:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
568:20:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
503:14:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
351:13:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
321:12:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
311:14:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
296:01:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
275:01:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
254:23:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
210:12:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
2199:September 2018 etc.etc.etc.
1320:I'm as reliable on math as
1145:compared to Israel's 22.8%.
1087:Arab adolescents aged 14-17
183:21:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
172:Citation (contents) needed!
154:20:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
139:19:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
123:18:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
3050:
2910:03:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
2890:03:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
2872:02:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
2852:21:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
1844:Wider Implications Section
1711:outlying development areas
1032:Data from Kleinberger book
162:percent of the edits (413
109:a post secondary diploma.
3006:22:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
2980:15:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
2964:14:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
2948:19:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
2932:04:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
1269:The 1967 census of the WB
1089:in 1966/7 were as low as
814:I'll simplify the thread.
2172:Harvard University Press
2137:do some background work.
1737:terminology bias section
1678:without their language.
480:Source. Morris Pollak,
385:secondary school system
2857:Gross violation of POV
2780:
2301:
2197:Jewish Voice for Peace
1649:
1648:
1601:
1148:
858:
196:
2775:
2297:
2187:Amnesty International
1643:
1639:
1597:
1141:
854:
223:Israeli official data
191:
42:of past discussions.
2954:read one more time--
1972:this by RAIA and JVP
627:Yes, you are right.
221:Here's some genuine
2770:to attempt to link
2331:notable commentator
240:15 (1964), p. 512;
99:Education in Israel
3029:template (see the
2764:every other nation
2982:
2950:
2798:
2783:legal terra nulla
2731:
2672:
2632:
2565:
2550:targeted killings
2423:
2379:
2346:
2179:978-0-674-98992-4
2099:
2021:
1821:
1802:
1755:
1191:
921:
765:
670:
216:extremely dubious
87:
86:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3041:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3028:
3024:
3020:
3016:
2975:
2970:
2943:
2938:
2921:
2900:
2883:
2848:
2821:
2817:
2791:
2786:
2724:
2719:
2697:
2665:
2660:
2625:
2620:
2558:
2553:
2499:indirect. While
2486:
2448:
2416:
2411:
2392:
2372:
2367:
2339:
2334:
2112:
2092:
2087:
2014:
2009:
1814:
1809:
1795:
1790:
1748:
1743:
1189:
1075:18 (1967), 536.
914:
909:
758:
753:
750:heroic upholding
663:
658:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3049:
3048:
3044:
3043:
3042:
3040:
3039:
3038:
3026:
3022:
3018:
3014:
3012:
3010:
2973:
2941:
2915:
2894:
2877:
2859:
2846:
2831:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2818:
2814:
2805:
2789:
2722:
2691:
2663:
2623:
2594:'as an analogy
2556:
2480:
2442:
2414:
2386:
2370:
2337:
2306:in your opinion
2189:25 August 2016
2106:
2090:
2012:
1846:
1812:
1793:
1746:
1739:
1034:
912:
756:
661:
200:be 'deleeete'.
92:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3047:
3045:
3008:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2952:
2951:
2913:
2912:
2892:
2858:
2855:
2830:
2827:
2823:
2822:
2811:
2810:
2806:
2804:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2745:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2700:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2603:
2599:
2591:
2590:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2472:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2381:
2380:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2302:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2220:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2190:
2181:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1976:
1975:
1964:
1961:
1958:
1955:
1952:
1949:
1946:
1943:
1932:
1929:
1926:
1923:
1916:
1913:
1910:
1907:
1904:
1845:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1738:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1675:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1650:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1602:
1595:
1592:
1585:
1584:
1570:
1562:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1527:
1524:
1521:
1518:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1486:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1352:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1208:
1186:User:Nishidani
1167:
1156:
1152:
1149:
1139:
1135:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:13.9% non-Jews
1052:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1033:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1006:
988:
965:
946:
942:
924:
923:
922:
884:
881:the World Bank
862:
859:
852:
849:
845:
838:
834:
827:
821:
818:
815:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
771:
768:
767:
766:
729:
721:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
610:
582:
578:
574:
555:
552:
549:
546:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
522:
519:
516:
513:
508:
505:
490:
478:
477:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
394:
391:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
357:
338:
331:
313:
284:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
226:
219:
197:
189:
167:
156:
91:
88:
85:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3046:
3037:
3032:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2994:
2984:
2983:
2981:
2977:
2976:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2949:
2945:
2944:
2936:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2929:
2925:
2919:
2911:
2908:
2904:
2898:
2893:
2891:
2888:
2881:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2856:
2854:
2853:
2850:
2849:
2842:
2838:
2834:
2828:
2816:
2813:
2809:
2802:
2797:
2793:
2792:
2784:
2779:
2773:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2754:
2750:
2730:
2726:
2725:
2716:
2715:
2714:
2710:
2706:
2701:
2695:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2671:
2667:
2666:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2631:
2627:
2626:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2597:
2593:
2592:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2576:
2564:
2560:
2559:
2551:
2547:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2511:
2507:
2502:
2490:
2484:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2460:
2456:
2452:
2446:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2422:
2418:
2417:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2401:
2397:
2390:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2373:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2347:
2345:
2341:
2340:
2332:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2307:
2303:
2300:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2251:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2219:
2218:
2214:
2210:
2204:
2203:
2198:
2194:
2191:
2188:
2185:
2182:
2180:
2177:
2173:
2170:
2169:
2164:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2157:
2156:
2154:
2153:
2151:
2150:
2148:
2147:
2145:
2144:
2142:
2141:
2138:
2134:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2110:
2105:
2098:
2094:
2093:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2022:
2020:
2016:
2015:
2007:
2004:
2000:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1962:
1959:
1956:
1953:
1950:
1947:
1944:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1930:
1927:
1924:
1921:
1917:
1914:
1911:
1908:
1905:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1886:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1843:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1820:
1816:
1815:
1806:
1801:
1797:
1796:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1754:
1750:
1749:
1736:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1676:
1672:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1631:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1603:
1600:
1596:
1593:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1580:
1575:
1571:
1568:
1563:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1525:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1353:
1351:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1322:Pat Robertson
1318:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1274:
1270:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1168:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1140:
1136:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1098:
1094:
1092:
1088:
1083:
1081:
1076:
1074:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1031:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1002:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
980:
979:
975:
971:
966:
962:
961:
960:
956:
952:
947:
943:
941:
938:
934:
930:
925:
920:
916:
915:
907:
904:
903:
902:
898:
894:
890:
885:
882:
877:
876:
875:
871:
867:
863:
860:
857:
853:
850:
846:
843:
839:
835:
832:
828:
825:
822:
819:
816:
813:
812:
811:
810:
807:
803:
799:
785:
781:
777:
772:
769:
764:
760:
759:
751:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
696:
695:
694:
690:
686:
682:
681:Israeli Arabs
678:
673:
672:
671:
669:
665:
664:
656:
633:
630:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
611:
607:
606:
605:
602:
598:
597:
596:
592:
588:
583:
579:
575:
571:
570:
569:
565:
561:
556:
553:
550:
547:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
523:
520:
517:
514:
512:
509:
506:
504:
500:
496:
491:
488:
485:
484:
479:
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
459:
456:
453:
450:
447:
446:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
421:
417:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
389:
388:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
361:
358:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
339:
336:
332:
329:
324:
323:
322:
319:
314:
312:
308:
304:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
273:
269:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
220:
217:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
198:
195:
190:
186:
185:
184:
180:
176:
173:
168:
165:
161:
157:
155:
151:
147:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
127:
126:
125:
124:
120:
116:
110:
108:
104:
100:
96:
89:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3027:{{notelist}}
3025:template or
3011:Cite error:
2995:
2991:
2971:
2953:
2939:
2914:
2860:
2844:
2832:
2815:
2807:
2787:
2782:
2776:
2771:
2763:
2744:
2720:
2661:
2621:
2595:
2554:
2497:
2471:
2412:
2368:
2348:
2335:
2327:
2305:
2298:
2261:
2205:
2167:
2158:
2155:
2152:
2149:
2146:
2143:
2136:
2132:
2130:
2129:
2088:
2079:
2023:
2010:
1998:
1995:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1810:
1791:
1744:
1740:
1680:Sesquivalent
1670:
1644:
1640:
1598:
1573:
1566:
1555:
1341:
1284:
1267:
1232:BilledMammal
1198:BilledMammal
1163:
1144:
1142:
1120:
1103:Sesquivalent
1099:
1095:
1090:
1086:
1084:
1079:
1077:
1072:
1070:
1065:
1061:
1059:
1035:
1010:BilledMammal
992:Sesquivalent
983:
970:BilledMammal
951:Sesquivalent
932:
910:
905:
893:BilledMammal
855:
823:
794:
754:
749:
733:Sesquivalent
724:
717:
713:
685:Sesquivalent
680:
677:all Israelis
676:
659:
652:
615:BilledMammal
587:BilledMammal
510:
482:
384:
327:
288:Sesquivalent
264:
246:Sesquivalent
241:
237:
233:
229:
222:
192:
175:Sesquivalent
171:
159:
146:Sesquivalent
115:Sesquivalent
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
75:
43:
37:
2250:Selfstudier
2115:Selfstudier
2084:Jeff Halper
1968:Jeff Halper
1890:Selfstudier
1826:Selfstudier
1761:Selfstudier
1674:a deadline.
848:schoolers).
837:pp.585-587.
714:your source
387:there were
36:This is an
3013:There are
2808:References
2163:Amy Kaplan
1366:Dr Johnson
1273:this table
831:Croom Helm
3031:help page
2998:Vanlister
2956:Vanlister
2924:Vanlister
2897:Vanlister
2880:Vanlister
2864:Vanlister
2781:It's the
2607:Nishidani
2580:Nishidani
2483:Nishidani
2311:Nishidani
2264:Nishidani
2224:Nishidani
2209:Nishidani
2052:Nishidani
1981:Nishidani
1776:Nishidani
1715:Nishidani
1654:Nishidani
1607:Nishidani
1531:Nishidani
1327:Nishidani
1307:Nishidani
1247:Nishidani
1213:Nishidani
1192:added an
1190:hopefully
1172:Nishidani
1125:Nishidani
866:Nishidani
824:One datum
776:Nishidani
700:Nishidani
560:Nishidani
511:1964-1966
495:Nishidani
489:1967 p.20
343:Nishidani
303:Nishidani
202:Nishidani
131:Nishidani
82:Archive 9
76:Archive 8
70:Archive 7
65:Archive 6
60:Archive 5
3017:tags or
2974:nableezy
2942:nableezy
2918:Nableezy
2790:nableezy
2749:OgamD218
2723:nableezy
2705:OgamD218
2694:Nableezy
2664:nableezy
2645:OgamD218
2624:nableezy
2598:false.'?
2596:facially
2557:nableezy
2531:OgamD218
2506:OgamD218
2451:OgamD218
2445:Nableezy
2415:nableezy
2396:OgamD218
2389:Nableezy
2371:nableezy
2352:OgamD218
2338:nableezy
2280:OgamD218
2091:nableezy
2026:WP:UNDUE
2013:nableezy
1871:OgamD218
1813:nableezy
1794:nableezy
1747:nableezy
1671:and Gaza
1628:common.
913:nableezy
757:nableezy
716:and not
662:nableezy
655:policies
3019:{{efn}}
2174:2018
2030:WP:ONUS
2028:anyhow
1342:primary
984:textual
581:adults.
493:drinks.
416:yeshiva
383:In the
188:again:-
39:archive
2847:buidhe
2527:nulla,
2109:Shrike
2066:Shrike
2034:Shrike
1920:WP:MOS
1194:anchor
1005:rates.
933:at all
283:22.8%.
2969:Nah.
2768:WP:OR
2195:RAIA/
2080:years
1742:all.
1160:WP:OR
889:WP:RX
420:heder
242:ibid.
164:yours
16:<
3002:talk
2960:talk
2928:talk
2907:Zero
2903:ping
2887:Zero
2868:talk
2803:Refs
2753:talk
2709:talk
2649:talk
2611:talk
2584:talk
2535:talk
2510:talk
2455:talk
2400:talk
2356:talk
2315:talk
2284:talk
2228:talk
2213:talk
2176:ISBN
2119:talk
2070:talk
2056:talk
2038:talk
1985:talk
1938:See
1894:talk
1875:talk
1830:talk
1780:talk
1765:talk
1719:talk
1684:talk
1658:talk
1630:Zero
1611:talk
1579:Zero
1535:talk
1357:Zero
1347:Zero
1331:talk
1311:talk
1290:Zero
1286:Here
1278:Zero
1251:talk
1236:talk
1217:talk
1202:talk
1176:talk
1155:(?).
1129:talk
1107:talk
1014:talk
996:talk
974:talk
955:talk
937:Zero
929:here
897:talk
870:talk
806:Zero
802:Here
798:Zero
780:talk
737:talk
704:talk
689:talk
629:Zero
619:talk
601:Zero
591:talk
564:talk
499:talk
347:talk
335:here
318:Zero
307:talk
292:talk
272:Zero
268:here
250:talk
206:talk
179:talk
160:44.6
150:talk
135:talk
119:talk
1574:all
1184:Hi
1091:228
1066:844
718:you
328:But
107:49%
103:85%
3033:).
3004:)
2978:-
2962:)
2946:-
2930:)
2870:)
2843:)
2839:¡
2794:-
2755:)
2727:-
2711:)
2668:-
2651:)
2628:-
2613:)
2586:)
2561:-
2537:)
2512:)
2457:)
2419:-
2402:)
2375:-
2358:)
2342:-
2333:.
2317:)
2286:)
2230:)
2215:)
2165:,
2133:or
2121:)
2095:-
2072:)
2058:)
2040:)
2017:-
2008:.
2005:,
1987:)
1896:)
1877:)
1832:)
1817:-
1798:-
1782:)
1767:)
1751:-
1721:)
1686:)
1660:)
1641:::
1613:)
1537:)
1333:)
1313:)
1253:)
1238:)
1230:"
1219:)
1204:)
1178:)
1164:we
1131:)
1109:)
1016:)
998:)
976:)
957:)
917:-
899:)
872:)
782:)
761:-
739:)
725:if
706:)
691:)
666:-
621:)
593:)
566:)
501:)
349:)
309:)
294:)
252:)
208:)
181:)
152:)
137:)
121:)
3000:(
2958:(
2926:(
2920::
2916:@
2899::
2895:@
2882::
2878:@
2866:(
2841:c
2837:t
2835:(
2751:(
2707:(
2696::
2692:@
2647:(
2609:(
2582:(
2533:(
2508:(
2485::
2481:@
2453:(
2447::
2443:@
2398:(
2391::
2387:@
2354:(
2313:(
2282:(
2226:(
2211:(
2117:(
2111::
2107:@
2068:(
2054:(
2036:(
1983:(
1892:(
1873:(
1828:(
1778:(
1763:(
1717:(
1682:(
1656:(
1609:(
1533:(
1329:(
1309:(
1249:(
1234:(
1226:"
1215:(
1200:(
1174:(
1127:(
1105:(
1012:(
994:(
972:(
953:(
895:(
868:(
833:.
778:(
735:(
702:(
687:(
617:(
589:(
562:(
497:(
418:,
345:(
305:(
290:(
248:(
204:(
177:(
148:(
133:(
117:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.