742:
and frame languages. The term "frame" or "frame language" is seldom used in AI anymore and the most popular ontology language (OWL) is not really a frame language, its based on FOL where as Frame languages (usually) are more ad hoc and don't have a formal basis. KEE (Knowledge
Engineering Environment) for example. In any case, my real point is this article is essentially just a list and the way the list is organized as far as I can tell is just based on some editor's intuition (i.e.,
726:", so if the articles were to be merged, it would not be ontology language into frame language but the other way around, however: (2) There is little overlap between the literatures on ontology languages and frame languages, so merging the articles appears contraindicated, but this would have to be confirmed by surveying the content of the articles. (3) There is plenty of literature from which to construct a good, well-referenced article.
247:
222:
191:
311:
233:
461:
languages are then used to sort/recognise and group the data to give a unified set of structured data in a format all parties can use. What the customer submits is a mish-mash of flat-file, harcopy and/or database data. What he receives is one set of data sorted into catagories, sub-catagories and objects. - Jason Davis - jd_abc@hotmail.com
431:, which is a very clear introduction (and I'm speaking as someone who only knows of the Semantic Web by hearsay so far). But psychologically, the problem is that the sentence "Ontology languages are formal languages used to construct ontologies", read on the surface level, sounds just tautological and thus doesn't incite one to click on the
855:
Regarding your second paragraph, you said: "My guess is you would find very few articles that talk about frame languages that don't use the term ontology." That is an easily testable hypothesis, and it appears to be disconfirmed (depending on how you define "very few"); three out of four articles on
741:
I don't find your argument at all convincing. You can't just base these things on the results of Google searches. You have to read the actual articles. In IT people often use different words or phrases for essentially the same idea. I do agree that there is a distinction between ontology languages
790:
I completely agree that (as you said) "You have to read the actual articles." When I said, "Conclusions I draw from this data set..." I wasn't referring to the numbers alone; I glanced at the top results for each query, and I said above, "this would have to be confirmed by surveying the content of
484:
I think I understand the ideas expressed here but there are no specific references to back them up. Also, I'm pretty well read on the topic of ontologies and frame languages and I don't recall ever reading anything that described the various languages as they are described in this article. I.e., I
760:
One more point regarding your search. It looks like you searched for: ("frame language" and "ontology language") but not ("frame language" and "ontology"). My guess is you would find very few articles that talk about frame languages that don't use the term ontology. So for example in an article
460:
Business
Messaging is a prime example of Ontology. With Business Messaging, a group of companies with varying technology, can send similar data, but in different formats, to the Business Messaging company. The various types of data are scanned, if hardcopy, or imported into the system. Ontology
791:
the articles". I also agree that (as you said) "this article is essentially just a list". I also agree that (as you said) "people often use different words or phrases for essentially the same idea" (and not just in IT). For a funny example of this, see
901:
357:
I think we all agree that this shit is pretty thick and hard to understand. I suggest someone using wikipedia as a *great* example of ontology in action. Hopefully that will provide a clear understanding and an appropriate context?
381:
Hi, I'm not sure that I understand your question. The
Ontology language article does need some improvement. But Knowledge is not an ontology, so I don't see how it would make a great example. Also, have you taken a look at the
761:
about KEE it may not say "KEE was one of the most popular commercial ontology languages in the early days of AI" but it would almost certainly say things like "the way a developer uses KEE to create an ontology is..." --
153:
232:
795:. You also said: "I do agree that there is a distinction between ontology languages and frame languages." That was exactly my point, so I agree that we agree, at least regarding your first paragraph.
746:) And the important question isn't if there is a difference but is there enough of a difference to merit two articles, especially when one article (this one) is essentially worthless as is? --
147:
941:
936:
295:
301:
79:
44:
361:
931:
85:
373:
271:
874:
Thanks for the reply and for doing the work to do the searches. I accept your point and I think we are pretty much in agreement. --
715:
The large numbers in the Google
Scholar results are, of course, approximate. The redundancy in queries is for rhetorical effect.
168:
946:
254:
227:
99:
30:
135:
104:
20:
489:
article. I may add a merge proposal but for now wanted to document this is possible OR and needs some serious attention. --
442:
refers to "ontology" in the computer science meaning of the word. If you are not familiar with this meaning, please read
74:
202:
443:
432:
428:
409:
383:
65:
905:
129:
879:
766:
751:
494:
865:
731:
369:
125:
319:
109:
190:
511:
267:
365:
175:
208:
860:
that mention "frame language" OR "frame languages" do not mention "ontology". See the preceding table.
875:
785:
762:
747:
505:
490:
861:
792:
727:
161:
55:
485:
think this whole article may qualify as original research. Also, it pretty much overlaps with the
270:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
70:
141:
719:
51:
24:
913:
449:(I'm not going to risk editing the item myself, though, due to my ignorance of the subject)
435:
link. So maybe the
Context part could be reworded with a small addition at the beginning:
857:
811:
723:
519:
486:
417:
331:
323:
925:
450:
743:
470:
466:
387:
909:
246:
221:
310:
413:
263:
917:
883:
869:
770:
755:
735:
498:
473:
427:
And in theory that would be fine because the link on "ontologies" leads to
390:
618:
259:
722:" is a genuine subject, and the term is more widely used than the term "
465:
That is a good example of the use of an ontology. If you can find good
421:
386:
article? That may have more of the introduction you're looking for?
397:
Renaming the links in the "Context" part might make things clearer
469:
for this use, then you can add that to the article. Good luck,
334:. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the
184:
15:
309:
424:
rules that support the processing of that knowledge."
160:
514:
queries that I ran just a moment ago (19 May 2017):
258:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
300:This article has not yet received a rating on the
835:"frame language" OR "frame languages" -"ontology"
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
174:
8:
718:Conclusions I draw from this data set: (1) "
401:Presently the initial "Context" part says:
808:
706:"frame languages" NOT "ontology languages"
674:"ontology languages" NOT "frame languages"
642:"ontology languages" AND "frame languages"
615:
516:
216:
188:
942:Automatically assessed Computing articles
480:This Article seems like Original Research
690:"frame language" NOT "ontology language"
658:"ontology language" NOT "frame language"
634:"ontology language" AND "frame language"
607:"frame languages" -"ontology languages"
575:"ontology languages" -"frame languages"
408:are formal languages used to construct
218:
543:"ontology languages" "frame languages"
335:
937:Unknown-importance Computing articles
827:"frame language" OR "frame languages"
591:"frame language" -"ontology language"
559:"ontology language" -"frame language"
7:
535:"ontology language" "frame language"
252:This article is within the scope of
904:that could be added to Knowledge's
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
245:
231:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
280:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing
283:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
932:Stub-Class Computing articles
896:Distributed Ontology Language
510:Here are the results of some
474:22:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
412:. They allow the encoding of
274:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
918:08:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
444:ontology (computer science)
429:ontology (computer science)
384:Ontology (computer science)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
963:
906:list of ontology languages
302:project's importance scale
499:18:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
317:
299:
240:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
884:14:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
870:12:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
771:14:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
756:14:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
736:01:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
391:12:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
947:All Computing articles
512:bibliographic database
318:This article has been
314:
268:information technology
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
364:comment was added by
313:
255:WikiProject Computing
100:Neutral point of view
666:"ontology languages"
567:"ontology languages"
105:No original research
815:
793:Template:World view
650:"ontology language"
622:
551:"ontology language"
523:
456:Business Management
320:automatically rated
809:
616:
517:
440:Ontology languages
420:and often include
406:Ontology languages
330:because it uses a
315:
286:Computing articles
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
842:
841:
814:(words anywhere)
720:Ontology language
713:
712:
698:"frame languages"
614:
613:
599:"frame languages"
522:(words anywhere)
377:
350:
349:
346:
345:
342:
341:
326:or other tool as
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
25:Ontology language
954:
902:another language
816:
789:
682:"frame language"
623:
583:"frame language"
524:
509:
359:
337:
288:
287:
284:
281:
278:
249:
242:
241:
236:
235:
234:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
962:
961:
957:
956:
955:
953:
952:
951:
922:
921:
898:
876:MadScientistX11
786:MadScientistX11
783:
763:MadScientistX11
748:MadScientistX11
506:MadScientistX11
503:
491:MadScientistX11
482:
458:
416:about specific
399:
360:—The preceding
355:
285:
282:
279:
276:
275:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
960:
958:
950:
949:
944:
939:
934:
924:
923:
897:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
862:Biogeographist
858:Google Scholar
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
840:
839:
836:
832:
831:
828:
824:
823:
820:
812:Google Scholar
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
776:
775:
774:
773:
728:Biogeographist
724:frame language
711:
710:
707:
703:
702:
699:
695:
694:
691:
687:
686:
683:
679:
678:
675:
671:
670:
667:
663:
662:
659:
655:
654:
651:
647:
646:
643:
639:
638:
635:
631:
630:
627:
612:
611:
608:
604:
603:
600:
596:
595:
592:
588:
587:
584:
580:
579:
576:
572:
571:
568:
564:
563:
560:
556:
555:
552:
548:
547:
544:
540:
539:
536:
532:
531:
528:
520:Google Scholar
487:Frame language
481:
478:
477:
476:
457:
454:
398:
395:
394:
393:
366:70.217.244.128
354:
351:
348:
347:
344:
343:
340:
339:
316:
306:
305:
298:
292:
291:
289:
272:the discussion
250:
238:
237:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
959:
948:
945:
943:
940:
938:
935:
933:
930:
929:
927:
920:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
895:
885:
881:
877:
873:
872:
871:
867:
863:
859:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
837:
834:
833:
829:
826:
825:
821:
818:
817:
813:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
794:
787:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
772:
768:
764:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
745:
740:
739:
738:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
716:
708:
705:
704:
700:
697:
696:
692:
689:
688:
684:
681:
680:
676:
673:
672:
668:
665:
664:
660:
657:
656:
652:
649:
648:
644:
641:
640:
636:
633:
632:
628:
625:
624:
620:
609:
606:
605:
601:
598:
597:
593:
590:
589:
585:
582:
581:
577:
574:
573:
569:
566:
565:
561:
558:
557:
553:
550:
549:
545:
542:
541:
537:
534:
533:
529:
526:
525:
521:
515:
513:
507:
501:
500:
496:
492:
488:
479:
475:
472:
468:
464:
463:
462:
455:
453:
452:
447:
445:
441:
436:
434:
430:
425:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
402:
396:
392:
389:
385:
380:
379:
378:
375:
371:
367:
363:
352:
333:
332:stub template
329:
325:
321:
312:
308:
307:
303:
297:
294:
293:
290:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
256:
251:
248:
244:
243:
239:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
899:
819:Search terms
717:
714:
626:Search terms
527:Search terms
502:
483:
459:
448:
439:
438:"The phrase
437:
426:
405:
403:
400:
356:
327:
253:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
810:Queries on
621:(keywords)
617:Queries on
518:Queries on
148:free images
31:not a forum
926:Categories
467:references
446:first."
433:ontologies
410:ontologies
338:parameter.
328:Stub-class
199:Stub-class
422:reasoning
414:knowledge
277:Computing
264:computing
260:computers
228:Computing
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
900:This is
822:Results
629:Results
619:WorldCat
530:Results
451:Calmansi
374:contribs
362:unsigned
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
578:13,300
570:13,300
562:81,700
554:81,800
471:Gwernol
418:domains
388:Gwernol
154:WP refs
142:scholar
910:Jarble
838:2,050
830:2,730
594:2,080
586:2,230
336:|auto=
266:, and
205:scale.
126:Google
744:wp:or
353:Thick
322:by a
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
914:talk
880:talk
866:talk
767:talk
752:talk
732:talk
677:233
669:233
661:823
653:824
610:540
602:632
546:101
538:144
495:talk
370:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
709:11
701:11
693:29
685:30
376:) .
324:bot
296:???
176:TWL
928::
916:)
908:.
882:)
868:)
769:)
754:)
734:)
645:0
637:1
497:)
404:"
372:•
262:,
156:)
54:;
912:(
878:(
864:(
788::
784:@
765:(
750:(
730:(
508::
504:@
493:(
368:(
304:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
