353:
330:
311:
283:
262:
239:
224:
203:
184:
169:
139:
120:
385:
The article is excellent overall, I have no serious complaints about prose, references, image captions etc. However, the first time someone is mentioned by name, I feel adding a couple of descriptors is valuable in understanding (usually nationality and occupation, eg. English naturalist, American
415:
No problem, I understand your point of view, and it was only a minor suggestion. In fact, this is more of an issue in articles that are not science related. In any case, I believe the article is quite ready to go. You really should think about a peer review and later FA nomination soon.
402:
This matter has come up in a few previous GAs and FAs of mine. I prefer not to mention such descriptors, since they really are irrelevant details—what matters is the science, not where the person who did the science comes from. Therefore, I have removed the ones you
386:
zoologist, and so on). I already did add some descriptors, but I myself do not know many of those authors (or they are rather not wikilinked). Could this be arranged?--
66:
62:
47:
39:
98:
305:
197:
421:
391:
375:
90:
133:
55:
17:
159:
417:
387:
371:
86:
32:
335:
Image usage is very adequate. Images are provided when necessary, and are also very informative.
407:
297:
102:
229:
Article broadly covers important aspects of the species (morphology, taxonomy, ecology).
252:
324:
425:
410:
395:
379:
94:
144:
Intro size is adequate and summarizes the content. Everything else seems OK.
323:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
304:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
174:
Very well referenced. References are mostly verifiable.
74:
43:
189:
Reliable references are provided wherever necessary.
181:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
8:
370:I will detail any existing issues below.--
316:No copyright issues have been detected.
125:Text is clearly well written and fluid.
7:
259:Fair representation without bias:
24:
351:
328:
309:
281:
260:
237:
222:
201:
182:
167:
137:
118:
1:
352:
329:
310:
282:
261:
238:
223:
202:
183:
168:
138:
119:
444:
426:17:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
411:16:57, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
396:15:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
380:03:46, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
166:A. References to sources:
95:03:46, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
301:to illustrate the topic?
18:Talk:Oryzomys antillarum
112:reasonably well written
406:Thanks for reviewing!
216:broad in its coverage
350:Pass or Fail: Pass!
198:No original research
306:fair use rationales
280:No edit wars, etc:
416:Congratulations!--
221:A. Major aspects:
155:factually accurate
117:A. Prose quality:
325:suitable captions
435:
418:Daniel Cavallari
388:Daniel Cavallari
372:Daniel Cavallari
355:
354:
332:
331:
313:
312:
285:
284:
264:
263:
241:
240:
226:
225:
205:
204:
186:
185:
171:
170:
141:
140:
122:
121:
87:Daniel Cavallari
79:
70:
51:
443:
442:
438:
437:
436:
434:
433:
432:
368:
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
441:
439:
431:
430:
429:
428:
404:
399:
398:
367:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
336:
321:
320:
319:
317:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
234:
233:
232:
230:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
194:
193:
192:
190:
179:
178:
177:
175:
151:
150:
149:
148:
147:
145:
130:
129:
128:
126:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
440:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
409:
405:
401:
400:
397:
393:
389:
384:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
365:
357:
356:
349:
348:
346:
343:
337:
334:
333:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
307:
303:
302:
300:
299:
293:
287:
286:
279:
278:
276:
272:
266:
265:
258:
257:
255:
254:
249:
243:
242:
235:
231:
228:
227:
220:
219:
217:
213:
207:
206:
199:
195:
191:
188:
187:
180:
176:
173:
172:
165:
164:
162:
161:
156:
152:
146:
143:
142:
135:
131:
127:
124:
123:
116:
115:
113:
109:
108:
107:
106:
104:
101:review – see
100:
96:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
369:
344:
295:
274:
251:
236:B. Focused:
215:
158:
154:
136:compliance:
111:
105:for criteria
97:
83:
82:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
44:visual edit
366:Discussion
160:verifiable
84:Reviewer:
27:GA Review
296:contain
294:Does it
103:WP:WIAGA
345:Overall
253:neutral
67:history
48:history
34:Article
408:Ucucha
403:added.
298:images
275:stable
273:Is it
250:Is it
214:Is it
153:Is it
110:Is it
76:Watch
16:<
422:talk
392:talk
376:talk
157:and
91:talk
63:edit
40:edit
196:C.
134:MoS
132:B.
424:)
394:)
378:)
347::
327::
308::
277:?
256:?
218:?
200::
163:?
114:?
99:GA
93:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
420:(
390:(
374:(
89:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.