Talk:Last Tango in Paris - Knowledge (XXG)

1605:

assumed that she herself was a highly sexualized person. As early a 1975 she stated in an interview with Roger Ebert that at the time of the film's release she made up stories about her promiscuity as a joke because she thought that all of the publicity and assumptions about her sex life were ridiculous. However when these stories were published everyone assumed that they were true and she wanted to be taken seriously as an actress, not a sex symbol. Add to that the fact that, according to her, for years afterwards men would approach her in public and make vulgar references to the "butter scene" as a joke (as in "Go get the butter"). This, as stated by her in interviews during the 2000s, was why she regretted both making the film and agreeing to film the "butter scene". It also is what led to her drug addiction. She specifically said that the media attention was what led to her addiction, not that particular scene. In the 2000s interviews she even made a joke about butter: "I never cook with butter, only olive oil." Now in these interviews she did say that the scene itself was not in the script and that she was only told about it just before filming it. She stated that at that time she let her objection to and anger over the scene be well known to Bertolucci and Brando, but that Brando convinced her to shoot the scene. Both she and Brando specifically stated that no actual sex acts occurred on set, with Schneider saying "Not at all" when asked about it. So to answer one question, no penetration of any kind occurred in the scene.

1684:

fact that it was sodomy, which is often considered a homosexual act. From how I am reading it, when the Italian government brought charges against Bertolucci, etc all, it was because a homosexual act was being depicted. It seems to me that at that time the fact that the act was sodomy was the reason many people were so upset, not because it was a rape involving butter. I actually do not know when the first homosexual love making scene was first depicted in a mainstream or art house film, but I don't recall one earlier than 1973 (other than kissing). Now I have not read any current articles that object to the scene for that reason, but I do think that its worth mentioning that the history of the scenes controversy appears to be directly related to homophobia. Bertolucci was controversial before this in 1970 when

1611:

odd that Bertolucci's version is in fact worse than Schneider's version, but it also doesn't make much sense if you watch the actual scene, where the butter is mentioned over a minute before the sex act begins. I also think its odd that Schneider claimed that it was shot in one take, whereas several camera angles are used in the scene. Now it is possible that several cameras were rolling all at once during the one take, and that may very well be what occurred, but I personally think that that is unlikely based on my knowledge of filming techniques at that time. Multiple cameras just weren't as prevalent then as they are now. My point is, the two versions of the story don't quite add up, both in controversial and non-controversial ways.

1617:

where Bertolucci states that the scene was in the script. That's a key part of his side of the story. The individuals who posted this altered video made very strong statements about the treatment of actresses in films and asserted that Schneider was psychologically traumatized by the scene. They also asserted that she may have been physically assaulted in the scene. They did not say it did happen, they said it may have happened. Yahoo News gave the video more media exposure, making a minor (but sloppy) mistake in reporting where the 2013 interview took place at. And after that news outlets began reporting that Schneider was in fact literally raped in this scene.

1629:

This is hardly a new trend and we are constantly seeing the news media get more and more tabloid orientated. What's difficult is that objecting to the inaccuracies of the reporting here is dangerously close to endorsing rape, or at least one can anticipate that accusation. I think that many of the motivations behind the outrage are sincere, but I just wish people would look more closely at the facts before immediately grabbing their pitchfork and demanding a public hanging. That being said, I believe that I have done a good job editing the article in an objective way that does not force my personal opinion or bias. I will trust other editors to evaluate that.--

967:

relationship could become a meaningful. However, in the meantime Jeanne made her decision to get back to the "normal" life, to marry her fiancé and not to continue to be involved with the weird older man, with whom "anonymous sexual relationship" was exciting at the time, but became unacceptable when he wanted to have a "normal" relationship with her. When he showed aggressive need to connect his life with her, because of his child she was carrying, which could have gave him the meaning in life, she felt the urge to get rid of him, as she could not relate to his feelings and needs and sacrifice for him.

1777:, which means editing, sound mixing, special effects and maybe advertisements/pre-release publicity. It seems that new sections with duplicate material of some of this section have previously been created and reverted. The vast majority of this section relates to the so called "butter scene". The rest of it (basically the first two paragraphs) could be included in the "Reception" section. I'll wait a bit to see if there are objections, but otherwise I will re-arrange the section, create a new sub-section titled "Controversial sex scene", and add an expansion needed banner in the current section.-- 1355:

two reasons for my revert, which were a direct response to the two reasons in your previous revert. One reason was that you claimed that the info was unsourced. I am very skeptical of you somehow being unaware of the fact that (most) content in the lead does not need to be cited so long as it reflects content in the body of the article. And yet you reverted the edit based partially on that reason. The second reason was that according to you "who cares about 'journalists'?" That was the reason you gave and as far as you went to elaborate what that even means. That is at best

495: 455: 475: 1745:. It showed affection and techniques to hide one's secret homosexuality. Furthermore, it is a public secret that in the world of arts liberal views concerning sexual freedom always include acceptance of homo-eroticism, though this opinion may often remain hidden to the outer repressive world. Hollywood however is still quite out of date, reading the biased reactions on social media about the Bertolucci leaks. 1738:

claiming to know and rule her sexual feelings. I agree on your opinion about Bertolucci, Brando and Schneider. What many scarecrows are often forgetting is that legally in western countries in which consensual sexuality amongst adults is permitted an alleged victim him/herself (in maturity, sane etc.) is the only one who may put an alleged sexual crime of which he/she is telling he/she is a victim, to court.

385: 353: 325: 249: 222: 1623:

point did she ever state that she was unaware that she could have brought up charges of rape. That as never been stated before. Your last statement of the shame and uncertainty of victims is tragically accurate. But Schneider explained her regrets over making the film and specifically that her regret had more to do with the aftermath and controversy than the actual shooting of the film.

941: 395: 259: 527: 191: 1073: 1689:

mentioned. To be clear, in my opinion Bertolucci did manipulate both Brando and Schneider in order to get performances out of them and I do think that, in this particular scene, he could have handled it much better. He is a bully, but he made a great film with two great performances. But he is not a rapist and neither was Brando.--

728:

The date of a film's premiere does not necessarily contribute to its universally acknowledged release year. For example, a film may appear at a couple of film festivals in 2008 but only be released to the public in 2009. In this case, though, it looks like the film was publicly released in Italy on

1649:

In those days of sexual liberation, the 'sexual revolution', however, mentioning you were regarding your stand on these moral points of view would have caused an image of being old fashioned and sexually frigid, avoiding the key point which even now is playing its part: did Schneider have decided in

1628:

My two cents are this: Schneider is currently being exploited by opportunists who saw a high profile news story, re-shaped it to make it "juicier" and released an inaccurate account of both Bertolucci's 2013 interview and Schneider's life just to get attention, make headlines and frankly make money.

1616:

Now the recent media "revelations" are odd for several reasons. The story itself is very old news. The 2013 interview has been available since it was conducted and reported on before from several news outlets. The new version of the interview was slightly altered. Specifically it cuts out a sentence

1610:

Now Bertolucci's version is slightly different. He states that the scene was in the script as a rape involving sodomy and that Schneider was aware of that. But he does vaguely imply that Schneider was unaware of the use of the butter until the scene was shot to get a reaction from her. I think it is

1531:

Changed the quote to the one in the source, as IronMaidenRocks point out is something Schneider said. Also the source given for the 15 years period of him not talking to Bertolucci says nothing about it and the following source, again about the quote of being "violated" says nothing about it either.

1359:

and at worst a nonsensical tantrum. And so, based on the condescending remark and the baffling reasons behind your revert, I gave you a lecture and pointed out that such actions are "silly". And they are silly. And I think all of the facts speak for themselves here. And so now I will request: please

1604:

Basically here are the facts: The film was always controversial for its content and banned in several countries. It was also very successful and critically praised. Schneider, then an unknown actress, became a sudden celebrity. The media immediately associated her with the role, in other words they

1374:

I meant that this is an encyclopedia, with the high standards appropriate for an encyclopedia. Not Playboy magazine, with the low standards they use. What did I mean? You may not like my "demeanor", but if that is what it takes to keep low standards from entering this project, then so be it. Insult

1683:

I have one more thing to point out that as far as I know no current news articles are discussing. In 1972/1973 when the film was released and controversial, the "butter scene" was often what made so many people upset. Unless I am completely mistaken, it appears that what people objected to was the

1622:

So, to reiterate and re-answer all of your questions/concerns: All available statements made are that no sex act of any kind occurred on set, so no she was not penetrated by Brando or the butter. Schneider was not aware that she could have refused to shoot a scene that was not in the script. At no

1354:

violations". Would you care to explain what was meant by the reference to Playboy? I would interpret it as condescending and rude, perhaps directed at me or perhaps at the other editor. I am not the one trying to OWN any page, I reverted an edit once and described why in the edit summary. I listed

1737:

I read Schneider hated being regarded as a sex symbol, in a time period in which she acted in many movies having themes concerning double sexual standards and sexual liberation. Meanwhile discovering her own bisexuality, the last she was after should have been getting someone in her personal life

1688:

depicted a closeted homosexual male in 1930s fascist Italy, so Italian and international censors were already familiar with this theme in his work. This, of course, does not address anything in your previous two edits, but I think it is an added detail to the history of this scene that should be

1588:

Rape according to Dutch law, may also happen by penetrating forcibly a body with a subject. Reading on Maria Schneider's afterwards reactions it seems to me she wasn't aware she could legally have stated she had been raped, however she hadn't made up her mind about the fact if she could state of

679:, the film first received an X-rating, but due to controversy about its content, it was edited to have an R-rating to have national distribution with less issue. I think that the sentences should be removed in their entirety and new ones written to be closer to what's in the link I presented. — 1643:

Thank you for your extensive reply which clears a lot. Quoting "But Schneider explained her regrets over making the film and specifically that her regret had more to do with the aftermath and controversy than the actual shooting of the film": public morale, or rather: the public lack of morale

1646:

However, Bertolucci's stand remains immoral. Schneider should have been pointed on her rights of objection to cooperate in an unplanned improvisation. I think many would have warned her about the double standards on sexuality, the either being a Madonna or a whore controversy, in those days

966:

Plot could be understood differently. Paul did consider this relationship only as "anonymous sexual relationship" until he heard that Jeanne was pregnant. And then, the possibility to finally have a child suddenly changed his attitude. His all life could have had a new meaning and thus the

1204:

There are two versions of the video which depicts Bertolucci's 2013 interview. One is uncut and has been available (in several places) since the interview was conducted, one was edited and uploaded in November 2016. The edited version is the one referred to in the

1647:

emphasized by conservative moralists and radical feminists, and that Schneider would never be able to escape being in the middle of a societal taboo, eventually becoming a target of those seeking either a victim or a collaborator to win their opposite cases.

1516:

I see. Thanks. I note that context isn't given, and is actually a quote by Maria Schneider. I don't imagine it'd be possible to find where Brando actually said this? In the source, this seems like something Brando told Schneider in person.

905:

In the plot summary there’s a mention of a rape that would occur in her father’s apartment and was cut. I don’t see any evidence that a “second rape” (counting butter as first rape) was part of the original film. I think it’s important.

1664:

The same dilemma did victimize Brando, feeling manipulated by Bertolucci. Both Schneider and Brando were exploited by a director wanting pure emotions on the screen. I wonder if Bertolucci was influenced by the views on sexuality of

1740:

About homosexual acts in mainstream movies you could be right, but of course underground, subcultural anti-establishment movies were ahead of their time. Rosa von Praunheim made a movie about homosexuality in 1970 in Germany:

863:

I concur with the original post. The butter scene isn't mentioned before the quote, but much further along in the article and under a separate section, making it completely unclear until someone has read the entire article. –

153: 1589:'being forced to' take part in the scene. It is also a known fact that rape victims feel ashamed, do doubt their own feelings and if memories of these can be reliable enough to forward them in trial. Etc. etc. 729:

December 15, 1972 then publicly released in the United States and the United Kingdom on January 27, 1973. (This is based on IMDb; verifiability by citation should come from somewhere more reliable for all.) —

572:

No, I don't think that is correct. LTiP was Bertulucci's story to which he and Franco Arcalli wrote the screenplay. Robert Alley's book was based on the film. Irshgrl500--irshgrl500 17:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

1221:

interview (which is filmed somewhere in the Netherlands) with the Cinémathèque Française interview a few months later. Its not a terribly important mistake, but it is inaccurate (and in my opinion sloppy)

1138:

It is mentioned at length in the post-production section. The word "rape" is metioned 13 times! I am utterly taken aback by your revert and claim that it is not mentioned in the article. Also, be ware of

1298:

issues is childish. 3. Not nice to call a person "silly" for disagreeing with you. It is now clear to me that you should take a break from this article for a few days, and you'll see things differently.

2037: 1560:

Just to clarify, Brando did make such statements in his autobiography, so I think Schneider was paraphrasing him. But the current source of the quote in the article is from Schneider.--

504: 371: 925:

Isn't that implying that she didn't shoot him on purpose? Which is definitely not the impression I get from the film. Unless there are objections I'll change it to "she shoots him".

484: 367: 563:

Also, LTiP was based on a book, which is not mentioned in the article. Did (pen-name) Robert Alley do the novelization after the movie ? I think it was based on an earlier book.

464: 363: 1317:

for clarifying the changes to the video clip here. I think the article looks fairly well-balanced as it stands. I'm no longer sure that any mention is needed in the lead section.

147: 830:

It's very unclear as to what the quote is talking about. A rape scene in the movie? Some off-camera voyeurism that the director supported? Could this be clarified somehow?

2036:

Brando did not rape her. She totally went along with it. It was the entire point of their relationship. If you don't understand this, you should stop watching movies.

1978: 1974: 1960: 1868: 1864: 1850: 540: 2119: 799: 1209:

article, and cuts out the beginning of the interview and a short section of the middle of the interview where Bertolucci states that the scene was in the script.--

79: 2109: 2099: 676: 44: 2089: 1050: 315: 2104: 602:

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level.

560:

I have been unable to find what the uncredited song is that plays after Marlon Brando's character fixes the record player; it would be nice to know.

2094: 2064: 557:

The music was by Oliver Nelson, and Gato Barbieri was the soloist and perhaps wrote the theme. It is not right to say Barbieri did the film music.

305: 85: 2084: 2074: 1189:

I'm really not sure what "slightly altered version" means, or is meant to imply. Are you? I think it deserves a mention in the lead section.

831: 334: 232: 1836: 1427:, I too amused by all this (the conversation here, not the situation about the film in the news). Wishing happy, rational editing to all.-- 30: 281: 1946: 1746: 1670: 1651: 1590: 1350:, come on now. Judging from both your demeanor and a quick glance at your editing history, you clearly have a tendency towards "serious 1000: 660:

The above makes no sense. How can it be rated in 1997, then released in 1981? That needs to be fixed. Or maybe I'm missing something. --

626: 1158: 2114: 2069: 2041: 413: 99: 1956:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1846:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1826: 104: 20: 1546:

Sorry, the one about the 15 years period is in the source, but has a total different reason for no talking to him, gonna add that

1123:

This seems to be a notable recent revelation. Surely it should be adequately covered, not just briefly mentioned, in the article?

168: 2059: 768:

It is likely true, that "this loss of anonymity disillusions Jeanne about the relationship", but it is not mentioned in the film.

589: 135: 74: 1217:) 23:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC) Oh and also another mistake made by (as far as I have seen) every news article is confusing the 1175:

Well, perhaps you can work with the sources and make it a bit clearer. But no reason to create yet another section about this.

984: 272: 227: 202: 2079: 1816: 1459:

magazine did not originate the story, Yahoo news did on November 30.But the same YouTube video is cited. Will correct now.--

759:

The present plot summary stresses the beginning and especially the end of the film, but leaves most of the film undescribed.

65: 425: 417: 771:

The second and third paragraph of the plot desciption talk about the same scene and should be merged into one paragraph.

421: 408: 358: 2021: 1911: 1201:

p.s. 12 instances of that word, I think, including: "Brando later said he "felt raped and manipulated" by the film." !?

1699: 1236:

The lead is already very clear that the film was controversial. Please keep in mind that this is an encyclopedia, not

1051:

https://web.archive.org/20071214234528/http://www.nypost.com:80/seven/07232007/gossip/pagesix/sick_stick_pagesix_.htm

129: 978: 816: 740: 690: 533: 109: 1522: 1492: 665: 1977:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1867:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

125: 1413: 1322: 1194: 1166: 1128: 835: 1650:

completely full consent? There is no doubt she wasn't aware of the burden she would have to carry afterwards.

1356: 1054: 208: 1157:

How exactly was the interview a "slightly altered version"? The way that passage is currently written is not

1004: 630: 2012: 1938: 1902: 1808: 1782: 1750: 1728: 1714: 1694: 1674: 1655: 1634: 1594: 1565: 1507: 1464: 1432: 1423:

OK, you changed "you" to "I", which makes even less sense. Um, I guess we're done here. Also for the record

1394: 1365: 1277: 1259: 1227: 1214: 622: 577: 175: 564: 1140: 999:

Does anyone know if the original X-rated cut has been released at any time? Can this be added if it has.

911: 55: 1996:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1984: 1886:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1874: 1837:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090629060644/http://camillacastro.org/Movie/Last_Tango_In_Paris/index.html

1669:, which were popular amongst Marxists and sexual liberation opinion leaders in the late 60s, early 70s. 1105: 1085:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

280:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1937:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1807:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 70: 1947:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120614035532/http://scc.lexum.org/en/1978/1978scr2-662/1978scr2-662.html

1705: 1518: 1488: 869: 661: 585: 907: 791: 190: 1930: 1800: 1551: 1537: 1424: 1409: 1380: 1336: 1318: 1304: 1245: 1190: 1180: 1162: 1148: 1124: 1022: 949: 940:

I wasn't altogether sure Jeanne intended to shoot Paul. But I found a source that says so clearly:

930: 891: 850: 776: 718: 603: 494: 161: 24: 1827:

https://web.archive.org/web/20091211065556/http://www.sbbfc.co.uk/CaseStudies/Last_Tango_in_Paris

1778: 1724: 1710: 1690: 1630: 1561: 1503: 1460: 1428: 1390: 1361: 1314: 1273: 1255: 1223: 1210: 762:

How can Paul be interested in renting an appartment which he owns (inherited from his dead wife)?

141: 1981:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1871:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1840: 1351: 1287: 865: 1997: 1887: 1086: 1950: 1032: 845:

No, the scene where he takes here from behind, with the butter. To me that was cristal-clear.

51: 1101: 2004: 1894: 1295: 1269: 1093: 1817:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110105081412/http://daily.greencine.com/archives/007965.html

1774: 1719: 1487:

Brando quote about 'feeling raped and manipulated' by director is not in source given. --

1040: 581: 454: 1830: 474: 1963:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1853:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1376: 1347: 1332: 1300: 1241: 1176: 1144: 945: 926: 887: 846: 812: 772: 736: 714: 686: 2003:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1970: 1893:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1860: 1092:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2053: 1666: 647:

After revisions were made to the MPAA ratings code, it was classified as an NC-17 in

264: 709:

Italian film", but it also says that "the film premiered in New York on October 14,

1820: 412:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 400: 1703:

in years but I don't recall there being a scene that went beyond kissing. Also,

1290:

violation, since 1. I am calm. 2. Your implication that any resistance to what

2045: 2026: 1969:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1916: 1859:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1786: 1754: 1732: 1678: 1659: 1638: 1598: 1569: 1555: 1541: 1526: 1511: 1496: 1468: 1436: 1417: 1405: 1398: 1384: 1369: 1340: 1326: 1308: 1281: 1263: 1249: 1231: 1198: 1184: 1170: 1152: 1132: 1113: 1008: 988: 953: 934: 915: 895: 873: 854: 839: 820: 780: 744: 722: 694: 669: 634: 617: 606: 567: 390: 384: 352: 254: 806: 730: 680: 675:

I think that there may be a misunderstanding in this passage. According to

532:

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the

324: 248: 221: 1743:

Nicht der Homosexuelle ist pervers, sondern die Gesellschaft in der er lebt

1313:

No need to call anyone childish! That's "not nice", lol. I'd like to thank

1055:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/07232007/gossip/pagesix/sick_stick_pagesix_.htm

616:

Some of the text is identical to the trivia in the imdb-Page to the film.

1547: 1533: 429: 1037:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

1709:

had a very homoerotic scene, but not one with sex. So I may be wrong.--

1237: 1080:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

974:

This was originally posted, today, on the Plot section of the article.

277: 755:

Could somebody rewrite the plot? It has shortcomings and mistakes.

1045:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

1773:

The "Post-production" section currently has nothing to do with

521: 184: 15: 1841:

http://camillacastro.org/Movie/Last_Tango_In_Paris/index.html

960:

This was originally posted on the Plot section of the article

1060:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

493: 473: 453: 323: 1951:

http://scc.lexum.org/en/1978/1978scr2-662/1978scr2-662.html

1941:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1811:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1644:

appearing in the public reactions did rape her afterwards.

1021:

I have just added archive links to one external link on

1934: 1804: 1026: 1831:

http://www.sbbfc.co.uk/CaseStudies/Last_Tango_in_Paris

1502:

Hi, it is. Second page, end of the second paragraph.--

1389:

What did I mean about what? You are not being clear.--

798:. Not listed there (probably because too new) is the 765:

Jeanne wasn't engaged yet when she and Paul first met.

160: 1331:

I agree with all four parts of the previous post. :)

276:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1973:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1863:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 174: 1697:) 23:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Er, I haven't seen 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1821:http://daily.greencine.com/archives/007965.html 428:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1959:This message was posted before February 2018. 1849:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 2120:Pages in the Knowledge (XXG) Top 25 Report 1929:I have just modified one external link on 805:published by the British Film Institute. — 705:Not to mention that the film is called "a 618:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070849/trivia 424:. To use this banner, please refer to the 347: 216: 1799:I have just modified 3 external links on 1404:Yeah c'mon, Debresser, you gotta own up, 1254:? I have no idea what you mean by that.-- 651:. MGM released a censored R-rated cut in 1717:) 23:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Oh, duh, 1375:me once more, and you will be reported. 794:mentions books and articles that cover 349: 218: 188: 2038:2601:449:4300:980:50C4:AAEA:DA7D:DD63 7: 406:This article is within the scope of 270:This article is within the scope of 2110:American cinema task force articles 536:. The week in which this happened: 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2100:Italian cinema task force articles 1268:Please calm down and don't try to 290:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject France 14: 2090:French cinema task force articles 1933:. Please take a moment to review 1803:. Please take a moment to review 1272:. It just makes you look silly.-- 1025:. Please take a moment to review 502:This article is supported by the 482:This article is supported by the 462:This article is supported by the 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 2105:C-Class American cinema articles 1071: 525: 438:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film 422:regional and topical task forces 393: 383: 351: 257: 247: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2095:C-Class Italian cinema articles 2065:High-importance France articles 1723:had fellatio, but off camera.-- 310:This article has been rated as 2085:C-Class French cinema articles 2027:17:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC) 1: 1917:20:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 1787:07:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC) 1527:10:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC) 332:This article is supported by 284:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2075:All WikiProject France pages 1755:00:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 1733:23:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 1679:11:58, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 1660:11:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 1639:07:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 1599:04:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 1570:21:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC) 1556:20:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1542:20:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1512:01:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 1497:00:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 1469:00:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1437:23:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1418:21:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1399:20:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1385:17:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1370:17:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1341:13:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1327:13:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1309:12:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1286:This last post is a serious 1282:00:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1264:00:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1250:00:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 1232:05:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 1199:23:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 1185:23:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 1171:23:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 1153:23:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 1133:22:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC) 1114:22:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC) 989:08:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 954:17:14, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 935:11:32, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 921:"gun goes off inexplicably"? 886:So by all means clarify it. 855:06:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 840:02:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 670:00:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 635:00:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1700:Sunday Bloody Sunday (film) 896:21:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 874:15:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 607:04:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 568:02:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 293:Template:WikiProject France 2136: 1990:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1926:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1880:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1796:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1043:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 1018:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 505:American cinema task force 316:project's importance scale 2115:WikiProject Film articles 2070:Paris task force articles 1769:Proposed renaming section 1119:Non-consensual rape scene 821:03:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 781:02:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 745:03:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 723:01:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 695:03:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 501: 485:Italian cinema task force 481: 461: 441:Template:WikiProject Film 378: 331: 309: 242: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2046:13:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC) 1294:want to do is me having 1009:13:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 916:16:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 598:WikiProject class rating 465:French cinema task force 2060:C-Class France articles 1922:External links modified 1792:External links modified 1532:So I'm deleting those. 1014:External links modified 541:December 4 to 10, 2016 498: 478: 458: 328: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 2080:C-Class film articles 979:Gareth Griffith-Jones 497: 477: 457: 327: 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 1971:regular verification 1861:regular verification 1706:Women in Love (film) 1068:to let others know. 1029:. If necessary, add 335:the Paris task force 105:No original research 1961:After February 2018 1931:Last Tango in Paris 1851:After February 2018 1801:Last Tango in Paris 1360:stop being silly.-- 1064:parameter below to 1023:Last Tango in Paris 803:Last Tango in Paris 796:Last Tango in Paris 414:join the discussion 25:Last Tango in Paris 2015:InternetArchiveBot 1966:InternetArchiveBot 1905:InternetArchiveBot 1856:InternetArchiveBot 981: 499: 479: 459: 329: 273:WikiProject France 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1991: 1881: 1420: 1112: 987: 985:The Welsh Buzzard 977: 792:FilmReference.com 625:comment added by 594: 580:comment added by 550: 549: 520: 519: 516: 515: 512: 511: 416:and see lists of 346: 345: 342: 341: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2127: 2025: 2016: 1989: 1988: 1967: 1915: 1906: 1879: 1878: 1857: 1455:I was mistaken. 1403: 1108: 1107:Talk to my owner 1103: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1044: 1036: 983: 809: 787:Resources to use 733: 683: 637: 612:Copied from imdb 593: 574: 553:author and music 529: 528: 522: 446: 445: 442: 439: 436: 409:WikiProject Film 403: 398: 397: 396: 387: 380: 379: 374: 355: 348: 298: 297: 294: 291: 288: 267: 262: 261: 260: 251: 244: 243: 238: 235: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2135: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2050: 2049: 2034: 2019: 2014: 1982: 1975:have permission 1965: 1939:this simple FaQ 1924: 1909: 1904: 1872: 1865:have permission 1855: 1809:this simple FaQ 1794: 1775:Post-production 1771: 1720:Midnight Cowboy 1586: 1519:IronMaidenRocks 1489:IronMaidenRocks 1485: 1121: 1111: 1106: 1076: 1072: 1038: 1030: 1016: 997: 962: 923: 832:168.103.245.247 828: 807: 789: 753: 731: 703: 701:Contradiction 2 681: 662:Crackthewhip775 643: 620: 614: 600: 575: 565:203.173.200.146 555: 546: 526: 443: 440: 437: 434: 433: 399: 394: 392: 361: 312:High-importance 296:France articles 295: 292: 289: 286: 285: 263: 258: 256: 237:High‑importance 236: 230: 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2133: 2131: 2123: 2122: 2117: 2112: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2082: 2077: 2072: 2067: 2062: 2052: 2051: 2033: 2030: 2009: 2008: 2001: 1954: 1953: 1945:Added archive 1923: 1920: 1899: 1898: 1891: 1844: 1843: 1835:Added archive 1833: 1825:Added archive 1823: 1815:Added archive 1793: 1790: 1770: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1739: 1686:The Conformist 1648: 1645: 1625: 1624: 1619: 1618: 1613: 1612: 1607: 1606: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1425:Martinevans123 1410:Martinevans123 1357:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 1345: 1344: 1343: 1319:Martinevans123 1266: 1234: 1191:Martinevans123 1163:Martinevans123 1161:, in my view. 1125:Martinevans123 1120: 1117: 1104: 1098: 1097: 1090: 1058: 1057: 1049:Added archive 1015: 1012: 996: 993: 992: 991: 970: 969: 961: 958: 957: 956: 922: 919: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 879: 878: 877: 876: 858: 857: 827: 824: 788: 785: 784: 783: 769: 766: 763: 760: 752: 749: 748: 747: 702: 699: 698: 697: 642: 639: 613: 610: 604:BetacommandBot 599: 596: 554: 551: 548: 547: 545: 544: 537: 530: 518: 517: 514: 513: 510: 509: 500: 490: 489: 480: 470: 469: 460: 450: 449: 447: 405: 404: 388: 376: 375: 356: 344: 343: 340: 339: 330: 320: 319: 308: 302: 301: 299: 282:the discussion 269: 268: 252: 240: 239: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2132: 2121: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2103: 2101: 2098: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2068: 2066: 2063: 2061: 2058: 2057: 2055: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2031: 2029: 2028: 2023: 2018: 2017: 2006: 2002: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1986: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1962: 1957: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1927: 1921: 1919: 1918: 1913: 1908: 1907: 1896: 1892: 1889: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1876: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1852: 1847: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1797: 1791: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1779:Deoliveirafan 1776: 1768: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1747:83.85.143.141 1744: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1725:Deoliveirafan 1722: 1721: 1716: 1712: 1711:Deoliveirafan 1708: 1707: 1702: 1701: 1696: 1692: 1691:Deoliveirafan 1687: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1671:83.85.143.141 1668: 1667:Wilhelm Reich 1663: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1652:83.85.143.141 1642: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1631:Deoliveirafan 1627: 1626: 1621: 1620: 1615: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1591:83.85.143.141 1583: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1562:Deoliveirafan 1559: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1504:Deoliveirafan 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1482: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461:Deoliveirafan 1458: 1454: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1429:Deoliveirafan 1426: 1422: 1421: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1391:Deoliveirafan 1388: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1362:Deoliveirafan 1358: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315:Deoliveirafan 1312: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274:Deoliveirafan 1271: 1267: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256:Deoliveirafan 1253: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1224:Deoliveirafan 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211:Deoliveirafan 1208: 1203: 1202: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1118: 1116: 1115: 1109: 1102: 1095: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1069: 1067: 1063: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1034: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1013: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001:97.124.86.177 994: 990: 986: 980: 975: 972: 971: 968: 964: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 938: 937: 936: 932: 928: 920: 918: 917: 913: 909: 897: 893: 889: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 875: 871: 867: 862: 861: 860: 859: 856: 852: 848: 844: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 825: 823: 822: 818: 814: 810: 804: 801: 797: 793: 786: 782: 778: 774: 770: 767: 764: 761: 758: 757: 756: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 727: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 678: 674: 673: 672: 671: 667: 663: 658: 656: 654: 650: 641:Contradiction 640: 638: 636: 632: 628: 627:89.245.93.131 624: 619: 611: 609: 608: 605: 597: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 570: 569: 566: 561: 558: 552: 542: 539: 538: 535: 534:Top 25 Report 531: 524: 523: 507: 506: 496: 492: 491: 487: 486: 476: 472: 471: 467: 466: 456: 452: 451: 448: 444:film articles 431: 427: 426:documentation 423: 419: 415: 411: 410: 402: 391: 389: 386: 382: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 360: 357: 354: 350: 337: 336: 326: 322: 321: 317: 313: 307: 304: 303: 300: 283: 279: 275: 274: 266: 265:France portal 255: 253: 250: 246: 245: 241: 234: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2035: 2013: 2010: 1985:source check 1964: 1958: 1955: 1928: 1925: 1903: 1900: 1875:source check 1854: 1848: 1845: 1798: 1795: 1772: 1742: 1718: 1704: 1698: 1685: 1587: 1584:Was it rape? 1486: 1483:Brando quote 1456: 1291: 1222:reporting.-- 1219:College Tour 1218: 1206: 1159:wholly clear 1122: 1099: 1079: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1059: 1020: 1017: 998: 973: 965: 924: 904: 829: 802: 795: 790: 754: 710: 706: 704: 659: 652: 648: 646: 644: 615: 601: 571: 562: 559: 556: 503: 483: 463: 407: 333: 311: 271: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 621:—Preceding 576:—Preceding 401:Film portal 148:free images 31:not a forum 2054:Categories 2022:Report bug 1912:Report bug 1141:recentisms 582:Irshgrl500 430:guidelines 418:open tasks 2005:this tool 1998:this tool 1895:this tool 1888:this tool 1406:capisce?? 1377:Debresser 1348:Debresser 1333:Debresser 1301:Debresser 1242:Debresser 1177:Debresser 1145:Debresser 1100:Cheers. — 1094:this tool 1087:this tool 946:Debresser 942:this link 927:RenniePet 908:Charidea2 888:Debresser 847:Debresser 773:Debresser 715:Debresser 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2011:Cheers.— 1901:Cheers.— 1352:WP:CIVIL 1288:WP:CIVIL 1033:cbignore 995:Releases 623:unsigned 590:contribs 578:unsigned 372:American 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2032:No Rape 1935:my edit 1805:my edit 1238:Playboy 1110::Online 1062:checked 1027:my edit 817:contrib 741:contrib 691:contrib 368:Italian 314:on the 199:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1296:WP:OWN 1270:WP:OWN 1041:nobots 826:Raped? 543:(10th) 364:French 287:France 278:France 228:France 205:scale. 126:Google 866:Quoth 233:Paris 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2042:talk 1783:talk 1751:talk 1729:talk 1715:talk 1695:talk 1675:talk 1656:talk 1635:talk 1595:talk 1566:talk 1552:talk 1538:talk 1523:talk 1508:talk 1493:talk 1465:talk 1457:Elle 1433:talk 1414:talk 1395:talk 1381:talk 1366:talk 1337:talk 1323:talk 1305:talk 1278:talk 1260:talk 1246:talk 1228:talk 1215:talk 1207:Elle 1195:talk 1181:talk 1167:talk 1149:talk 1129:talk 1066:true 1005:talk 950:talk 931:talk 912:talk 892:talk 870:talk 851:talk 836:talk 813:talk 808:Erik 800:book 777:talk 751:Plot 737:talk 732:Erik 719:talk 711:1972 707:1973 687:talk 682:Erik 677:this 666:talk 653:1981 649:1997 631:talk 586:talk 435:Film 420:and 359:Film 306:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1979:RfC 1949:to 1869:RfC 1839:to 1829:to 1819:to 1548:Atu 1534:Atu 1292:you 1053:to 713:". 176:TWL 2056:: 2044:) 1992:. 1987:}} 1983:{{ 1882:. 1877:}} 1873:{{ 1785:) 1753:) 1731:) 1677:) 1658:) 1637:) 1597:) 1568:) 1554:) 1540:) 1525:) 1517:-- 1510:) 1495:) 1467:) 1435:) 1416:) 1408:. 1397:) 1383:) 1368:) 1339:) 1325:) 1307:) 1280:) 1262:) 1248:) 1240:. 1230:) 1197:) 1183:) 1169:) 1151:) 1143:. 1131:) 1039:{{ 1035:}} 1031:{{ 1007:) 976:– 952:) 944:. 933:) 914:) 894:) 872:) 853:) 838:) 819:) 815:• 779:) 743:) 739:• 721:) 693:) 689:• 668:) 657:" 633:) 592:) 588:• 370:/ 366:/ 362:: 231:: 156:) 54:; 2040:( 2024:) 2020:( 2007:. 2000:. 1914:) 1910:( 1897:. 1890:. 1781:( 1749:( 1727:( 1713:( 1693:( 1673:( 1654:( 1633:( 1593:( 1564:( 1550:( 1536:( 1521:( 1506:( 1491:( 1463:( 1431:( 1412:( 1393:( 1379:( 1364:( 1335:( 1321:( 1303:( 1276:( 1258:( 1244:( 1226:( 1213:( 1193:( 1179:( 1165:( 1147:( 1127:( 1096:. 1089:. 1077:Y 1003:( 982:/ 948:( 929:( 910:( 890:( 868:( 849:( 834:( 811:( 775:( 735:( 717:( 685:( 664:( 655:. 645:" 629:( 584:( 508:. 488:. 468:. 432:. 338:. 318:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index