1006:
an industry. In pop culture, for example, there are a lot of buzz words and crazy ideas that have become mainstream due to the power of social media and the internet, which has given ordinary people (as a collective group) the power to inject new concepts directly into the mainstream consciousness. Once something is well-known, it's there to stay and becomes acceptable in an encyclopedia through references. I tend to think of the amusement industry in the same light. The press, enthusiasts, ordinary people – they all have the ability to influence new ideas, concepts, and definitions. "Hyper", "giga", and "strata" may have started out as marketing hype by one or two entities, but the terms have been since been embraced and used often. Maybe not by first parties, but definitely by the consumer, which plays just as much of an important part in shaping the industry. --
1141:
that another publication is using a certain term like giga or strata incorrectly. That is pretty much the reason why I've given up trying to correct this page. I can't offer the kind of proof you are looking for. When I do a Google search on the term giga coaster I get back a frightening number of returns — mostly from fan sites, but the shear number is amazing. Personally I think very few of them know what they are talking about, particularly when I see those sites riddled with numerous other errors. I do know that when I go to the IAAPA Expo in a few weeks, I won't hear anyone at the B&M booth discussing giga coasters, but at this point, trying to convince the enthusiast world that there is no such thing as a B&M or Morgan giga coaster seems like a hopeless cause.
810:
even used the LA Times as a reference on occasion. I think we all know however, that newspapers often get their information from the
Internet and since a handful of Internet enthusiasts have used the term, so have the newspapers. I do know the the industry trade magazines and the industry in general avoid the term, as do most knowledgeable enthusiasts, but I really can't offer any proof. You can cite two articles that use the term, but how do I cite dozens of industry trade publications that don't? I'm not going to keep changing this page every time someone pops in the word Giga. At this point in time I concede.
442:
411:
595:
502:
661:
526:
235:
380:
673:
585:
558:
321:
203:
709:
788:
denying that it's being used and reported. These are just two sources, and there are undoubtedly more. The argument that city newspapers are rarely a good source when it comes to amusement rides needs to be backed by some kind of proof. "Rarely" is a heavy word and implies most of the time. I highly doubt that's true.
959:. By making these classifications for roller coasters over X height that form a complete circuit, they have facilitated the ability for more world-first claims, and thus gain more interest in the media and from potential visitors. The same issue occured with the hybrid classification coined by Six Flags;
1286:
I'll reiterate that I'm okay with the current edit. Listing it as a class seems the best way to include the term and will likely prevent future casual editors from adding "Leviathan is a Giga
Coaster" to the first line, as our last editor did. I think you made your point, and I agree that the term is
809:
It should be noted that revision yesterday that started this was made by someone who simply likes to make edits, and is not a regular contributor to amusement park-related pages. As much I despise the word 'Giga' you do make a good point that it has been picked up and used by "reliable" sources. I've
1236:
Just to be clear, the issue isn't about a roller coaster "model". If it was, then I'd expect B&M or any other manufacturer involved to support that label before I'd include it here. This is about a roller coaster "class", something whipped up by the other end of the spectrum - fans, enthusiasts,
1101:
You bring up an interesting point. I would find that surprising if in fact trade publications, even to this day, are not using these terms freely now. The problem, of course, is that we are now up to 4 reputable sources that have, and I'm certain there are a lot more. Unless we can find sources that
1005:
Yes, reporters can be wrong at times, regardless of what they're writing about. That's why we should seek multiple, independent sources to help to lower the chances of that being the case. We should also keep in mind that these terms do not necessarily need first-party approval to be accepted across
791:
From where I stand at the moment, both sources in question are used throughout
Knowledge as reliable sources, and to doubt their credibility here on the basis of opinion is not enough. The matter would need to be settled by clear consensus, facts, and possibly the RSN. Until then, citing them should
787:
already in the article) describe the
Leviathan as a "Giga" coaster. It's not being used to describe the "model", but instead a "class" of coasters that seems to have become an industry definition. Enthusiasts may disagree with one another on whether or not the term is really accepted, but there's no
1061:
states that a strata coaster "is a complete circuit coaster reaching more than 400 ft. (128 m) high". Is it possible these outlets first saw the terms on
Knowledge? Sure it is, but I also have confidence that these reporters asked someone within the industry for verification before publishing it. I
1045:
I totally understand where you're coming from. Proper research on these terms may indeed raise questions regarding their place of origin. However, Knowledge doesn't require us to delve that deep into such issues. We rely on reputable sources to do that research, and while it's reasonable to want to
848:
You have to take into consideration that newspaper writers are clueless about roller coasters. They've made so many ridiculous errors in the past; some which were actually very funny. Also, Canada's
Wonderland has never used the word "giga" in anything related to Leviathan. Now, I going to bring up
764:
DReifGalaxyM31 added "Giga" in the lead to describe
Leviathan. I simply moved it around to give it context, and mentioned it in the body of the article as well. This was partly reverted under the basis it didn't belong, that a previous discussion had already decided its fate. However, after reading
904:
I think we should build up a stable of reliable sources that precisely describe what these classifications are, rather than focusing on individual examples reported in copy-statistics-direct-from-the-press-release media. These classifications really come back to Cedar Point's marketing department.
1140:
And I'm sure you can come up with a lot more. A large portion of the people in the U.S. use the word ain't and you can probably reference it with numerous "reputable" sources but that still does not make it correct. I think it is very unlikely that any publication is going to go so far as to say
1046:
avoid relying on just one or two sources, I don't think that's going to be an issue here. In the first few minutes of an extensive search, it became apparent that several if not dozens of highly reputable sources exist, and that's in addition to what has already been mentioned. A
853:
wrong then? Finally, just one more example, Six Flags has never used the word "strata" which in my mind kinda says that giga and strata are terms created by Cedar Fair only for the sole purpose of marketing (Intamin does not have a strata model) and therefore really isn't a
933:
In doing so, the park has helped expand on three new definitive phrases describing roller coasters: hyper-coaster for those 200 feet tall; gigi-coaster, for those more than 300-feet tall; and now the self-coined strata-coaster for those more than 400-feet tall.
1607:{{cite web|first=Mike|title=Aqua Supports Add To The Canada's Wonderland 2012 Mystery|url=http://newsplusnotes.blogspot.com/2011/08/aqua-supports-add-to-canadas-wonderland.html|publisher=NewsPlusNotes|accessdate=18 August 2011|date=9 August 2011}}</ref: -->
926:
In 1989, Cedar Point built the 205-foot tall Arrow
Dynamics Magnum XL-200, the first coaster to top the 200-- foot tall mark. In 2000, Cedar Point was the first to break the 300-foot level when it built the 310-foot tall Intamin Millennium Force.
153:
963:
with all mentions on
Knowledge being removed. Now I'm not suggesting it may come to that in the end with this situation, but I feel we need sources to support more than ride "X is a _____coaster" for inclusion here.
1671:
516:
535:
425:
1244:
is correct, even if it is found in reliable sources. That's because you'd have an overwhelming number of sources that show how it's incorrect. You actually just highlighted my point with that example! --
1651:
511:
421:
1666:
930:
In 2003, Intamin came back to
Sandusky with the new coaster, a taller and faster model of the Xclerator that it built at Cedar Point's sister park Knott's Berry Farm, Buena Park, Calif.
147:
44:
1691:
1726:
960:
1486:
924:
It was only natural, coaster fans say, that Cedar Point be the first to break the 400-foot threshold because it was the first to top the other significant height barriers.
1676:
951:
Note the last paragraph in particular. Strata-coaster was self-coined by the park. Why? Because since 1997 there have been rides taller than 300ft/400ft out there, namely
194:
492:
1466:
766:
190:
1706:
1686:
1661:
1476:
1237:
etc. We don't have an official authority on the subject that can say, "Nope, sorry, "giga" is a made up class of roller coasters...stop using it...No soup for you!"
641:
540:
482:
1062:
mentioned this in the previous reply, but the problem with denying these terms today, is that they've already been embraced, even if it's for the wrong reasons. --
1528:
1524:
1510:
1388:
1384:
1370:
246:
1646:
765:
it, I'm not convinced that there was ever any closure in the debate – there was at least 2 for, 2 against, and 1 neutral. Here's a link to that discussion:
458:
79:
304:
1701:
1681:
1656:
784:
776:
1716:
651:
342:
168:
1721:
449:
416:
85:
135:
1622:
1487:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111126071102/http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/latest/blog/2011/11/25/Milestones_at_306_Feet.cfm
264:
1711:
1102:
explicitly say the terms are being incorrectly used, I don't see how we can ban them. Furthermore, "silence" on the issue from these
1506:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1366:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
617:
1496:
1490:
1467:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120425114044/http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/latest/blog/2011/9/15/Ready_For_Steel.cfm
905:
Here's an extract from an Amusement Business article from 2003 by Tim O'Brien, "New Cedar Point coaster world's tallest, fastest":
24:
1696:
1641:
1477:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111016130204/http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/latest/blog/2011/9/26/Tracking_Along.cfm
1356:
1054:
129:
352:
252:
99:
30:
104:
20:
125:
1605:{{Cite RCDB|coaster_name=Leviathan|location=Canada's Wonderland|rcdb_number=10108|accessdate=18 August 2011}}</ref: -->
1470:
956:
937:
686:
568:
74:
1480:
920:
1571:
1431:
608:
563:
391:
175:
742:
65:
441:
410:
1450:
1334:
357:
202:
185:
1593:
746:
1527:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1387:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
213:
1618:
141:
1601:
1562:
1458:
1422:
1342:
109:
1050:
1546:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1534:
1406:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1394:
971:
397:
335:
234:
1457:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1341:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
362:
1610:
1614:
750:
320:
161:
55:
616:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
457:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1249:
1111:
1067:
1011:
952:
797:
218:
70:
1626:
1576:
1531:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1497:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111206084249/http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/latest/
1436:
1391:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1305:
1253:
1205:
1159:
1115:
1071:
1015:
977:
887:
828:
801:
771:
I was indifferent at first, but being reverted like that got me thinking (which is dangerous!).
1547:
1491:
http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/latest/blog/2011/11/25/Milestones_at_306_Feet.cfm
1407:
1357:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110925210901/http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/ride/
1297:
1151:
820:
256:
51:
1197:
1040:
966:
879:
865:
717:
215:
1554:
1414:
217:
1500:
1513:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1471:
http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/latest/blog/2011/9/15/Ready_For_Steel.cfm
1373:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
678:
501:
454:
1553:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1481:
http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/latest/blog/2011/9/26/Tracking_Along.cfm
1413:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1360:
1635:
1245:
1107:
1063:
1007:
843:
793:
600:
1288:
1142:
1096:
811:
660:
525:
1520:
1380:
1189:
1000:
871:
1600:
In early August 2011, it was discovered that the ride would be manufactured by
1519:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1379:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
668:
590:
584:
557:
1053:
says giga is "defined as one with a first drop of at least 300 feet". A 2010
708:
329:
741:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
1350:
862:. (Basically, there is no such thing as giga-class and strata-class).
613:
1188:
Knowledge really needs a "like" button. I agree with JlACer 100%.--
850:
917:
703:
373:
219:
15:
659:
524:
500:
1604:
after parts began to arrive on site.<ref name=RCDB: -->
1461:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1345:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1672:
High-importance Cedar Fair Entertainment Company articles
1454:
1338:
297:
1652:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are good articles
160:
1501:
http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/latest/
612:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
453:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1523:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1383:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1361:
http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/ride/
1667:GA-Class Cedar Fair Entertainment Company articles
1240:You'd also have a hard time showing that the word
1106:publications doesn't necessarily mean "denial". --
328:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1692:WikiProject Roller Coasters articles and lists
1509:This message was posted before February 2018.
1369:This message was posted before February 2018.
262:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
174:
8:
1727:Knowledge articles that use Canadian English
512:Cedar Fair Entertainment Company task force
1608:
721:, which has its own spelling conventions (
552:
405:
276:
229:
1677:Cedar Fair Entertainment Company articles
1449:I have just modified 4 external links on
1333:I have just modified 2 external links on
760:"Giga" term - archived discussion revived
1606:<ref name="NPN supports arrive": -->
554:
407:
1707:Low-importance Canada-related articles
1687:Mid-importance roller coaster articles
1662:Low-importance amusement park articles
1351:http://www.canadaswonderland.com/2012/
749:, this should not be changed without
467:Knowledge:WikiProject Amusement Parks
7:
870:Any thing I'm missing/wrong about?--
606:This article is within the scope of
470:Template:WikiProject Amusement Parks
447:This article is within the scope of
379:
377:
1647:Sports and recreation good articles
396:It is of interest to the following
247:Sports and recreation good articles
23:for discussing improvements to the
353:tallest and fastest roller coaster
14:
1453:. Please take a moment to review
1337:. Please take a moment to review
255:. If you can improve it further,
1702:GA-Class Canada-related articles
1682:GA-Class roller coaster articles
1657:GA-Class amusement park articles
707:
671:
593:
583:
556:
440:
409:
378:
319:
233:
201:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1717:Low-importance Ontario articles
1349:Corrected formatting/usage for
858:of roller coaster but rather a
646:This article has been rated as
487:This article has been rated as
241:Leviathan (Canada's Wonderland)
25:Leviathan (Canada's Wonderland)
849:an entire new issue but isn't
243:has been listed as one of the
1:
1627:04:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
957:Superman: Escape from Krypton
684:This article is supported by
620:and see a list of open tasks.
533:This article is supported by
509:This article is supported by
461:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1722:All WikiProject Canada pages
1306:14:36, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
1254:09:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
1206:20:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1160:20:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1116:13:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1072:13:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1016:13:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
978:00:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
888:14:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
829:15:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
802:05:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
626:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
629:Template:WikiProject Canada
450:WikiProject Amusement Parks
349:The text of the entry was:
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1743:
1540:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1451:Leviathan (roller coaster)
1446:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1437:17:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
1400:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1335:Leviathan (roller coaster)
1330:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
652:project's importance scale
536:Roller Coasters task force
493:project's importance scale
351:Did you know ... that the
1712:GA-Class Ontario articles
667:
645:
578:
532:
508:
486:
435:
404:
279:
275:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1602:Bolliger & Mabillard
1577:20:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
1697:Amusement park articles
1642:Knowledge good articles
1442:External links modified
1326:External links modified
632:Canada-related articles
473:amusement park articles
664:
529:
505:
386:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1287:not going to go away.
779:noted by Dom497) and
663:
528:
504:
253:good article criteria
195:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1521:regular verification
1381:regular verification
747:relevant style guide
743:varieties of English
305:Good article nominee
105:No original research
1511:After February 2018
1371:After February 2018
767:Leviathan IS A GIGA
745:. According to the
687:WikiProject Ontario
363:Canada's Wonderland
1594:WP:Reliable source
1565:InternetArchiveBot
1516:InternetArchiveBot
1425:InternetArchiveBot
1376:InternetArchiveBot
953:Tower of Terror II
665:
609:WikiProject Canada
530:
506:
392:content assessment
355:in Canada will be
280:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
1629:
1613:comment added by
1541:
1401:
1048:Chicago Sun-Times
942:
941:
781:Los Angeles Times
757:
756:
702:
701:
698:
697:
694:
693:
551:
550:
547:
546:
372:
371:
361:when it opens at
314:
313:
271:
226:
225:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1734:
1575:
1566:
1539:
1538:
1517:
1435:
1426:
1399:
1398:
1377:
1302:
1294:
1202:
1194:
1156:
1148:
1100:
1044:
1004:
976:
974:
969:
918:
884:
876:
869:
847:
825:
817:
773:The Toronto Star
718:Canadian English
714:This article is
711:
704:
681:
676:
675:
674:
634:
633:
630:
627:
624:
603:
598:
597:
596:
587:
580:
579:
574:
571:
560:
553:
475:
474:
471:
468:
465:
444:
437:
436:
431:
428:
413:
406:
389:
383:
382:
381:
374:
323:
300:
277:
260:
237:
230:
220:
206:
205:
196:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1742:
1741:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1632:
1631:
1584:
1569:
1564:
1532:
1525:have permission
1515:
1459:this simple FaQ
1444:
1429:
1424:
1392:
1385:have permission
1375:
1343:this simple FaQ
1328:
1298:
1290:
1198:
1190:
1152:
1144:
1094:
1038:
998:
972:
967:
965:
880:
872:
863:
841:
821:
813:
762:
751:broad consensus
677:
672:
670:
631:
628:
625:
622:
621:
599:
594:
592:
572:
566:
517:High-importance
472:
469:
466:
464:Amusement Parks
463:
462:
455:Amusement parks
429:
426:Roller Coasters
419:
417:Amusement Parks
390:on Knowledge's
387:
368:
367:
347:
343:August 29, 2011
296:
222:
221:
216:
193:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1740:
1738:
1730:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1634:
1633:
1615:Baffle gab1978
1598:
1597:
1589:
1588:
1583:
1580:
1559:
1558:
1551:
1504:
1503:
1495:Added archive
1493:
1485:Added archive
1483:
1475:Added archive
1473:
1465:Added archive
1443:
1440:
1419:
1418:
1411:
1364:
1363:
1355:Added archive
1353:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1238:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
940:
939:
936:
922:
915:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
834:
833:
832:
831:
792:be allowed. --
761:
758:
755:
754:
712:
700:
699:
696:
695:
692:
691:
683:
682:
679:Ontario portal
666:
656:
655:
648:Low-importance
644:
638:
637:
635:
618:the discussion
605:
604:
588:
576:
575:
573:Low‑importance
561:
549:
548:
545:
544:
541:Mid-importance
531:
521:
520:
507:
497:
496:
489:Low-importance
485:
479:
478:
476:
459:the discussion
445:
433:
432:
430:Low‑importance
414:
402:
401:
395:
384:
370:
369:
348:
327:
326:
324:
316:
315:
312:
311:
308:
301:
293:
292:
289:
286:
282:
281:
273:
272:
238:
224:
223:
214:
212:
211:
208:
207:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1739:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1680:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1637:
1630:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1603:
1595:
1591:
1590:
1586:
1585:
1581:
1579:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1567:
1556:
1552:
1549:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1536:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1512:
1507:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1447:
1441:
1439:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1427:
1416:
1412:
1409:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1396:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1372:
1367:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1352:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1331:
1325:
1307:
1303:
1301:
1295:
1293:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1207:
1203:
1201:
1195:
1193:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1161:
1157:
1155:
1149:
1147:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1098:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1042:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1002:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
979:
975:
970:
962:
958:
954:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
935:
931:
928:
923:
919:
916:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
889:
885:
883:
877:
875:
867:
861:
857:
852:
845:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
830:
826:
824:
818:
816:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
789:
786:
782:
778:
774:
769:
768:
759:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
719:
713:
710:
706:
705:
689:
688:
680:
669:
662:
658:
657:
653:
649:
643:
640:
639:
636:
619:
615:
611:
610:
602:
601:Canada portal
591:
589:
586:
582:
581:
577:
570:
565:
562:
559:
555:
542:
539:(assessed as
538:
537:
527:
523:
522:
518:
515:(assessed as
514:
513:
503:
499:
498:
494:
490:
484:
481:
480:
477:
460:
456:
452:
451:
446:
443:
439:
438:
434:
427:
423:
418:
415:
412:
408:
403:
399:
393:
385:
376:
375:
366:
364:
360:
359:
354:
345:
344:
339:
337:
336:Did you know?
331:
325:
322:
318:
317:
309:
307:
306:
302:
299:
298:July 19, 2012
295:
294:
290:
287:
284:
283:
278:
274:
269:
267:
266:
258:
254:
250:
249:
248:
242:
239:
236:
232:
231:
228:
210:
209:
204:
200:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1609:— Preceding
1599:
1582:Removed text
1563:
1560:
1535:source check
1514:
1508:
1505:
1448:
1445:
1423:
1420:
1395:source check
1374:
1368:
1365:
1332:
1329:
1299:
1291:
1241:
1199:
1191:
1153:
1145:
1103:
1058:
1047:
932:
929:
925:
914:
881:
873:
859:
855:
851:this article
822:
814:
790:
780:
772:
770:
763:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
715:
685:
647:
607:
534:
510:
488:
448:
398:WikiProjects
356:
350:
341:
333:
303:
263:
261:
257:please do so
245:
244:
240:
227:
198:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1592:Not from a
1055:publication
1051:publication
1041:Themeparkgc
968:Themeparkgc
866:Themeparkgc
716:written in
148:free images
31:not a forum
1636:Categories
1572:Report bug
1432:Report bug
961:that ended
422:Cedar Fair
340:column on
251:under the
1555:this tool
1548:this tool
1415:this tool
1408:this tool
731:travelled
358:Leviathan
330:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1623:contribs
1611:unsigned
1561:Cheers.—
1421:Cheers.—
1246:GoneIn60
1108:GoneIn60
1064:GoneIn60
1008:GoneIn60
844:GoneIn60
794:GoneIn60
388:GA-class
365:in 2012?
265:reassess
199:180Â days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1596:(blog):
1587:History
1455:my edit
1339:my edit
1292:JlACEer
1146:JlACEer
1097:JlACEer
815:JlACEer
739:analyze
735:realize
650:on the
569:Ontario
491:on the
332:in the
288:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1192:Dom497
1001:Dom497
874:Dom497
727:centre
723:colour
623:Canada
614:Canada
564:Canada
394:scale.
310:Listed
291:Result
126:Google
1242:ain't
1104:trade
1057:from
973:Talk
860:brand
785:ref#4
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1619:talk
1300:talk
1250:talk
1200:talk
1154:talk
1112:talk
1068:talk
1059:Time
1012:talk
955:and
882:talk
856:type
823:talk
798:talk
777:link
285:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1529:RfC
1499:to
1489:to
1479:to
1469:to
1389:RfC
1359:to
642:Low
483:Low
176:TWL
1638::
1625:)
1621:•
1542:.
1537:}}
1533:{{
1402:.
1397:}}
1393:{{
1304:)
1252:)
1204:)
1158:)
1114:)
1070:)
1014:)
938:”
921:“
886:)
827:)
800:)
737:,
733:,
729:,
725:,
567::
543:).
519:).
424:/
420::
268:it
259:.
197::
156:)
54:;
1617:(
1574:)
1570:(
1557:.
1550:.
1434:)
1430:(
1417:.
1410:.
1296:(
1289:—
1248:(
1196:(
1150:(
1143:—
1110:(
1099::
1095:@
1066:(
1043::
1039:@
1010:(
1003::
999:@
878:(
868::
864:@
846::
842:@
819:(
812:—
796:(
783:(
775:(
753:.
690:.
654:.
495:.
400::
346:.
338:"
334:"
270:.
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
