Knowledge

Talk:Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702)/GA1

Source 📝

430:. The sub-chapter dealing with the Lithuanian Civil War in Sliesoriūnas' book of 2015, which is the sub-chapter "4.3 Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702)", continues onto sub-chapter " 4.4 Great Northern War in Lithuania (1700–1709)". I can only assume that the reason for the cut-off year of 1702 is because, as Sliesoriūnas writes in p550-551, "The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was almost free from the units of the Swedes and their allies Sapieha from the latter half of 1702 until 1704." As for Budreckis, he does not give any ending year for the civil war, instead continuing on about the events in Lithuania during the Great Northern War, as well as touching upon the remaining 18th century - the article's main focus is the Lithuanian Grand Hetmans and so it concerns them mainly. 361:"On 6 October 1696 in Warsaw, an agreement was signed between the Bishop of Vilnius and the representative of the Lithuanian Grand Hetman. It was agreed upon that there would be some benefits for the Bishop of Vilnius' ecclesiastical land holdings, but the hetman's right to decide whether to quarter the army for winter in the bishop's and church's holdings was, practically speaking, recognized. The nuncio committed himself to declaring the hetman innocent. It was forbidden in the future to excommunicate Lithuania's ministers without the Pope's approval in advance. The bishop refused to call the hetman to the sejm's court. ". 77: 705:, at this point the review has been open for well over 6 months. The last edits the nom made were at ANI on January 25, during a discussion about the two of you having a content dispute elsewhere in the Lithuania topic area. During that ANI he went so far as to suggest you be TBANned from the area. There's also an 241:
background of the events should be expanded, it is not mentioned that originally Sapieha was in conflict primarily with King Sobieski, while the Bishop of Vilnius was more a royal tool. It should be mentioned that Sapieha's power was built up by the king as a counterbalance to the Pacs. And it was
713:
continued arguing between the two of you on each others' talk pages during that ANI. With all due respect, this does not suggest that he will be interested in collaborating with you in the GA process on this article any further. Frankly, the amount of squabbling between you two in this topic area
455:
for ease, because my responses will be intermingling with your text, so I'm doing it for clarity's sake. I'm dividing up my responses like that because I can't immediately address all the different things you've noticed, so I will address some of them faster, and others a bit slower, due to the
480:
try to double check dates and names, we need more dates of easily datable events like battles. Check if nothing is omitted. For example there is no mention of the agreement of 28 January 1698. Also I'm pretty sure that Sapieha's army in Jurbarkas battle was led by Jerzy not Kazimierz Jan.
484:
still valid: the article still lacks neccessary context, it omits important events, the narrative is also incomprehensible, it is not clear why some things follow each other. It is still unclear why the article ends with 1702 saying that "the civil war was still going
572:, it's been over three weeks since you last posted, and you've made over a hundred edits elsewhere on Knowledge while not posting to this review. If you can't prioritize this review, then you should strongly consider calling for a new reviewer. It isn't fair to 256:
Neuburg affair is mentioned but still lacks detail; there is not mention of "Berlin scandal" and involvement of king's son Jakub, who was berthorted to Karolina Radziwiłł. Also there is no mention of a short "war" between Radziwiłłs and Sapiehas in after her
216:
It will also take me some time to answer all of your notes. Also, I am unsure about how active I will be able to be on Knowledge during the next few days due to a trip, so I might only be able to answer them later.
82: 356:
In Sliesoriūnas' book (2015), he writes in p516 that "The most notable event of that time was Kazimieras Jonas Sapiega's excommunication ". This is reaffirmed in p518 of the same book, where it is written
393:
This agreement was between the king and Lithuanian nobility and stated that the Lithuanian army's size was to be slashed by more than half in an attempt to subvert the Sapiehas, thus resulting in diarchy
161: 288:
the aims and causes of the war, as well as its ultimate conclusion, are not clear. The leaders of the republican camp (Ludwik Pociej, Grzegorz Oginski, Michał Kociełł, etc.) are not mentioned.
157: 541:, could you please review this article and whether it meets the criteria for becoming a good article? A lot of what you pointed out previously was added to it since you last reviewed it.-- 142: 87: 134: 115: 342:, this needs a double checking, because AFAIK Sapieha had right to station his troops in Church estates, but still king supported Brzostowski in the conflict 105: 242:
only later that the Sapiehas turned against Sobieski. The issue of the French party and contacts with the French court, is also important, needs expanding.
150: 17: 706: 732: 38: 643:
You may have to judge the article on its current state then. It doesn't make sense to keep it open for 6 months waiting for the nom to engage. ♠
372:, I don't think it's the best wording, Polish language was already used in documents, from now on it was the sole language of administration 127: 41:
for discussion. No prejudice against a renomination should the nominator return at a later date and wish to undertake GAN again. ♠
250:
events of 1695 and 1696 aren't mentioned, conflict with the Radziwiłłs over the Neuburg estate, reconciliation with Brzostowski
313:
if you are reading in Lithuanian, you should look up works of Gintautas Sliesoriūnas, who is an expert on this particular topic
245:
this note still is valid, conflict with bishop was really a conflict with a king Sobieski, the conflict also didn't end in 1694
110: 191: 61:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
775:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
612:: it's been a month since the last post here, and six months since this review was opened. What are we doing here, guys? ♠ 740: 723: 675: 648: 617: 46: 743: 726: 696: 678: 665: 651: 638: 620: 599: 585: 564: 550: 531: 516: 465: 226: 210: 195: 49: 272:
I think I did it initially because I thought it needed to be emphasized, but I decide to remove them in this
736: 719: 671: 644: 626: 613: 512: 42: 201:
Hi, I will try to review this article, although it may tak a while and I will be adding my notes gradually
581: 546: 527: 461: 222: 416:
Jan Sapieha still maintained the will to regain his power and so, the Lithuanian Civil War continued
340:
although the army was only allowed to station in state estates and was forbidden in church estates
692: 661: 634: 595: 560: 508: 427: 206: 185: 426:
The problem here is that although the civil war continued, it became too intertwined with the
684: 609: 577: 573: 542: 523: 502: 457: 348:, it was an inderdict not excommunication, Sapieha wasn't excluded from the Church community 218: 276:
because they look out of place, although italicizing is justified for emphasis following
702: 688: 657: 630: 605: 591: 569: 556: 538: 498: 448: 202: 181: 34: 39:
Knowledge talk:Good article nominations#Talk:Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702)/GA1
277: 709:
for another dispute between the two of you in the same topic area. There's
590:
Cukrakalnis didn't make any changes since my last update of the review
629:
It seems like Cukrakalnis lost interest in developing of the article
253:
no mention of the Neuburg affair, it's an important context
395:, what kind of diarchy? What agreement, when it was signed? 370:
introduction of the Polish language in Lithuanian documents
507:
What is the status of this review? Is it still ongoing?
346:
the bishop excommunited Sapieha in the Vilnius Cathedral
451:, I will write my responses &tc. to your points in 404: 381: 302: 273: 169: 138: 687:if he still wants to improve the article or not 301:I have now added the republican leaders in this 670:Then fail it. The nom can always renominate. ♠ 8: 522:Yes, it is ongoing, but there was a hiatus. 555:I'll try to find some free time to do that 65: 37:closing this as unsuccessful. Please see 731:You'll see the ping, but I've posted to 733:Knowledge talk:Good article nominations 264:why Republicans are written in italics? 96: 68: 415: 392: 369: 345: 339: 714:suggests to me that you would not be 18:Talk:Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702) 7: 57:The following discussion is closed. 403:I hope I have addressed it in this 321:Yes, I have been doing so already. 24: 771:The discussion above is closed. 576:to keep them waiting this long. 418:, so why the article ended here? 656:It's not GA quality right now 1: 600:19:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC) 586:19:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC) 456:necessary reading involved.-- 744:22:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 727:22:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 697:22:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 679:18:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 666:18:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 652:18:11, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 639:09:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 621:06:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 565:22:50, 2 December 2022 (UTC) 551:22:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC) 532:17:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC) 517:01:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC) 50:23:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC) 790: 718:to collaborate on a GA. ♠ 466:18:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 227:20:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 211:11:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 196:11:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 773:Please do not modify it. 59:Please do not modify it. 683:Let's wait a bit for @ 627:Premeditated Chaos 428:Great Northern War 60: 735:about this nom. ♠ 124: 123: 58: 781: 506: 454: 431: 408: 385: 362: 357: 322: 306: 281: 174: 165: 146: 78:Copyvio detector 66: 789: 788: 784: 783: 782: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 707:open DR request 496: 494: 452: 425: 402: 379: 360: 355: 336: 331: 320: 300: 271: 238: 155: 132: 126: 120: 92: 63: 54: 53: 52: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 787: 785: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 535: 534: 493: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 435: 434: 433: 432: 420: 419: 412: 411: 410: 409: 397: 396: 389: 388: 387: 386: 374: 373: 366: 365: 364: 363: 358: 350: 349: 343: 335: 332: 330: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 315: 314: 310: 309: 308: 307: 295: 294: 293: 292: 285: 284: 283: 282: 266: 265: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 248: 247: 246: 237: 234: 232: 230: 229: 200: 175: 122: 121: 119: 118: 113: 108: 102: 99: 98: 94: 93: 91: 90: 88:External links 85: 80: 74: 71: 70: 64: 55: 33: 32: 31: 30: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 786: 774: 745: 742: 738: 734: 730: 729: 728: 725: 721: 717: 712: 708: 704: 700: 699: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 681: 680: 677: 673: 669: 668: 667: 663: 659: 655: 654: 653: 650: 646: 642: 641: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 623: 622: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 602: 601: 597: 593: 589: 588: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 568: 567: 566: 562: 558: 554: 553: 552: 548: 544: 540: 537: 536: 533: 529: 525: 521: 520: 519: 518: 514: 510: 504: 500: 491: 483: 482: 479: 478: 467: 463: 459: 450: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 429: 424: 423: 422: 421: 417: 414: 413: 406: 401: 400: 399: 398: 394: 391: 390: 383: 378: 377: 376: 375: 371: 368: 367: 359: 354: 353: 352: 351: 347: 344: 341: 338: 337: 333: 328: 319: 318: 317: 316: 312: 311: 304: 299: 298: 297: 296: 290: 289: 287: 286: 279: 275: 270: 269: 268: 267: 263: 255: 254: 252: 251: 249: 244: 243: 240: 239: 235: 233: 228: 224: 220: 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 198: 197: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 176: 173: 172: 168: 163: 159: 154: 153: 149: 144: 140: 136: 131: 130: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 103: 101: 100: 95: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 75: 73: 72: 67: 62: 51: 48: 44: 40: 36: 26: 19: 772: 715: 710: 495: 436: 231: 199: 188: 178: 177: 170: 166: 152:Article talk 151: 147: 128: 125: 116:Instructions 56: 685:Cukrakalnis 610:Cukrakalnis 578:BlueMoonset 574:Cukrakalnis 543:Cukrakalnis 524:Cukrakalnis 503:Cukrakalnis 458:Cukrakalnis 291:still valid 278:MOS:ITALICS 219:Cukrakalnis 139:visual edit 492:Discussion 83:Authorship 69:GA toolbox 539:@Marcelus 449:@Marcelus 179:Reviewer: 106:Templates 97:Reviewing 27:GA Review 703:Marcelus 689:Marcelus 658:Marcelus 631:Marcelus 606:Marcelus 592:Marcelus 570:Marcelus 557:Marcelus 499:Marcelus 203:Marcelus 192:contribs 182:Marcelus 111:Criteria 384:better? 236:General 162:history 143:history 129:Article 741:(talk) 724:(talk) 676:(talk) 649:(talk) 618:(talk) 257:death. 47:(talk) 171:Watch 16:< 716:able 711:also 693:talk 662:talk 635:talk 596:talk 582:talk 561:talk 547:talk 528:talk 513:talk 501:and 485:on". 462:talk 405:edit 382:this 334:Body 329:Lead 303:edit 274:edit 223:talk 207:talk 186:talk 158:edit 135:edit 737:PMC 720:PMC 672:PMC 645:PMC 614:PMC 608:, @ 509:CMD 453:red 380:Is 43:PMC 35:IAR 739:♠ 722:♠ 695:) 674:♠ 664:) 647:♠ 637:) 616:♠ 598:) 584:) 563:) 549:) 530:) 515:) 464:) 225:) 209:) 194:) 160:| 141:| 137:| 45:♠ 701:@ 691:( 660:( 633:( 625:@ 604:@ 594:( 580:( 559:( 545:( 526:( 511:( 505:: 497:@ 460:( 407:. 305:. 280:. 221:( 205:( 189:· 184:( 167:· 164:) 156:( 148:· 145:) 133:(

Index

Talk:Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702)
IAR
Knowledge talk:Good article nominations#Talk:Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702)/GA1
PMC
(talk)
23:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Marcelus
talk
contribs
11:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Marcelus
talk
11:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Cukrakalnis
talk
20:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.