521:
something else (such as textbooks and other resources during the period) afterwards, I also forgot such things for a while, which is certainly a pity (I am sorry about this too). In any event, I have a digital copy of the book "中外舊約章彙編" (which may be found online), which lists some 500 treaties and contracts etc signed by the Qing dynasty (between 1689 and 1911/1912) and some 600 treaties and contracts etc signed by the ROC (between 1912 and 1949), with exact dates for most of them, but the main problem is of course that the names (and the contents) of the treaties are only shown in the
Chinese language in the book, without the corresponding English names. Another problem is that the list is still not truly complete. For example, the book never lists the 1739 treaty signed between Qing and the Dzungar Khanate, as well as the 1842 Treaty of Chushul following the Dogra-Tibetan war (even though the treaty did appear to have reference to "Emperor of China"). It would be great if there is a book that does not have the above-mentioned issues. But in any case, I think we can expand the list according to the information we can find, listing both English and Chinese names whenever possible, and move the article to the mainspace. Thanks again for the work you have done! --
261:
251:
233:
411:
443:
764:, or split the list into separate lists for the Qing dynasty and the pre-1949 Republic of China. There are currently no other lists of treaties of China on Knowledge that cover different date ranges, so the current title may be more precise than necessary. The current list has two sections, covering the Qing dynasty and the pre-1949 Republic of China. The last item in the list is from 1947, not 1949. Date ranges should not use hyphens. —
593:
column that (auto-)numbers the treaties, it is mainly intended to show to readers that how many treaties are currently included in the list, and the column itself takes only very little space so I doubt that removing it will significantly widen the other columns (unlike merging the "Status" and "Note" columns mentioned earlier). Thus I have left the first column as is for now, although it may be easily removed later on if deemed necessary.
202:
355:
331:
674:
of Burma", but apparently this will take quite some space in the table (and it appears that the loss outweighs the gain in such cases). After all, I think only relatively few
English readers are indeed interested in knowing the exact government or dynasty that signed treaties with China, and there is
501:
I would be glad for your generously offered help! When I drafted the article, I had more ambition than time, and this is still the case. I'm sorry to have abandoned it, and even more sorry that at the moment I can't find where the information came from (I must have copied it from someplace). It would
624:
etc (and it appears to me that the policy mainly recommends against linking to modern states in such cases, if I understand it correctly). I had hoped to provide additional information for readers with links like these (for the exact regimes or governments that signed treaties with China). And of
568:
Even more thanks! I can see only a few more things to recommend. I'm not sure that the treaties need to be numbered, and removing the first column would make the other columns wider. Likewise, it seems that the text in the "Status" column could be moved to the "Note" column, which in almost every
592:
Thank again for the feedback. I certainly agree that the "Status" and "Note" columns can be merged altogether, and this will significantly widen the other columns. Indeed, with just this change it appears that each treaty now appears in exactly one row, at least on my computer. As for the first
520:
Thanks for your reply. And I am sorry to hear that you abandoned it earlier because of a lack of time. I was also studying for treaties earlier, but due to for example a lack of time to always keep being active in WP (e.g., I traveled abroad earlier this year), and the fact that I looked into
164:
55:
486:'s great efforts! Of course it can be further significantly expanded to make the list even more complete. How about trying to achieve this goal together and make it an actual article? I certainly appreciate your work on this. --
639:
Thanks for explaining -- it makes sense. Is there some way of indicating this in the article? Or maybe use the historical names instead of the modern ones? But that would take lots of space. It's perfectly OK as it is. Up to
539:
list, which would run into the hundreds, if not thousands, overwhelm readers, and keep them from finding what they are looking for. It might be better to limit the list to treaties that have or deserve
Knowledge
158:
895:
910:
666:. Also, I believe that most readers are more interested in the country which signed treaties with China, rather than the specific government or dynasty that did so. For example, if I simply show
395:
479:
I have seen this list of treaties, which is certainly a useful page even as a draft currently (especially since treaties were also an important part of this period of history). Thanks for
401:
757:
457:
35:
920:
930:
670:
in the table, most
English readers may not be familiar with it. But if instead "Burma" is shown, readers will immediately know it. One workaround may be to show something like "
905:
502:
be a good start to just clean it up and move it to mainspace, with the note that lists do not have to be referenced if the material is not controversial (these dates are not),
890:
845:
371:
307:
179:
146:
925:
915:
737:
362:
336:
849:
663:
609:
140:
885:
799:
90:
136:
420:
341:
186:
313:
753:
96:
662:
I have thought about this too, but the main problem is of course that would take lots of space as you just said, especially in cases like
722:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
900:
152:
841:
461:
283:
861:
833:
815:
788:
747:
684:
657:
634:
587:
563:
549:
530:
511:
495:
110:
41:
115:
31:
872:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
85:
213:
274:
238:
76:
596:
As for the links, if you try to follow them, you will notice that they are actually linked to historical states like
282:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
713:
449:
761:
367:
120:
572:
A minor point is that it is not policy to link major countries like "Russia," Burma, the UK, and so forth.
17:
769:
723:
219:
798:: There were also a small number of treaties of China signed even before the Qing dynasty (such as the
625:
course we can try to find even more references if readers want more, just as stated in your message. --
857:
829:
784:
675:
also limited space available for the table, so it may not be possible to show every detail in it. --
172:
66:
726:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
370:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
81:
811:
743:
680:
630:
597:
559:
526:
491:
410:
250:
232:
62:
803:
765:
671:
667:
605:
853:
825:
780:
621:
601:
879:
653:
645:
583:
545:
507:
807:
676:
626:
555:
522:
487:
266:
256:
649:
641:
579:
541:
503:
482:
575:
Let's see if we can find a reference or two for readers who want more.
613:
617:
279:
354:
330:
535:
Excellent! But let's keep in mind that we don't want or need a
437:
195:
26:
409:
569:
case is empty. Again, this would widen the other columns.
448:
On 30 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be
896:
List-Class China-related articles of
Unknown-importance
453:
758:
List of treaties of China before the People's
Republic
458:
List of treaties of China before the People's
Republic
171:
36:
List of treaties of China before the People's
Republic
824:: Relisting in order to achieve a clearer consensus.
366:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
278:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
911:
Unknown-importance International relations articles
554:Thanks for the feedback. Fully agree with this. --
400:This article has not yet received a rating on the
312:This article has not yet received a rating on the
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
921:Unknown-importance International law articles
806:of 822) that can also be added to the list. —
380:Knowledge:WikiProject International relations
185:
8:
931:WikiProject International relations articles
383:Template:WikiProject International relations
906:List-Class International relations articles
664:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
610:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
712:The following is a closed discussion of a
325:
227:
201:
199:
18:Talk:List of treaties of China (1689-1949)
891:Unknown-importance China-related articles
852:have been notified of this discussion.
327:
229:
926:WikiProject International law articles
916:List-Class International law articles
754:List of treaties of China (1689-1949)
454:List of treaties of China (1689-1949)
7:
731:The result of the move request was:
360:This article is within the scope of
272:This article is within the scope of
846:WikiProject International relations
612:etc, instead of modern states like
363:WikiProject International relations
34:for discussing improvements to the
25:
886:List-Class China-related articles
868:The discussion above is closed.
441:
386:International relations articles
353:
329:
259:
249:
231:
200:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
772:) 01:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
748:05:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
738:closed by non-admin page mover
218:It is of interest to multiple
1:
862:02:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
850:WikiProject International law
834:02:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
816:20:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
789:02:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
705:Requested move 30 August 2024
421:WikiProject International law
418:This article is supported by
374:and see a list of open tasks.
286:and see a list of open tasks.
53:Put new text under old text.
292:Knowledge:WikiProject China
61:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
947:
901:WikiProject China articles
402:project's importance scale
314:project's importance scale
295:Template:WikiProject China
762:List of treaties of China
417:
399:
348:
311:
244:
226:
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
870:Please do not modify it.
719:Please do not modify it.
685:18:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
658:04:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
635:22:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
588:19:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
564:17:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
550:05:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
531:17:28, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
512:15:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
496:00:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
377:International relations
368:International relations
337:International relations
414:
298:China-related articles
208:This article is rated
86:avoid personal attacks
413:
111:Neutral point of view
116:No original research
800:Tang-Tibetan Treaty
475:Article expansion?
415:
214:content assessment
97:dispute resolution
58:
864:
842:WikiProject China
836:
822:Relisting comment
791:
741:
598:Tsardom of Russia
472:
471:
436:
435:
432:
431:
428:
427:
324:
323:
320:
319:
275:WikiProject China
194:
193:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
938:
839:
820:
804:Changqing Treaty
773:
746:
735:
721:
672:Konbaung dynasty
668:Konbaung dynasty
606:Konbaung dynasty
485:
460:. The result of
445:
444:
438:
388:
387:
384:
381:
378:
357:
350:
349:
344:
333:
326:
300:
299:
296:
293:
290:
269:
264:
263:
262:
253:
246:
245:
235:
228:
211:
205:
204:
203:
196:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
946:
945:
941:
940:
939:
937:
936:
935:
876:
875:
874:
873:
802:of 783 and the
742:
717:
707:
480:
477:
442:
385:
382:
379:
376:
375:
339:
297:
294:
291:
288:
287:
265:
260:
258:
212:on Knowledge's
209:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
944:
942:
934:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
878:
877:
867:
866:
865:
837:
818:
751:
729:
728:
714:requested move
708:
706:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
622:United Kingdom
602:Russian Empire
594:
576:
573:
570:
515:
514:
476:
473:
470:
469:
462:the discussion
446:
434:
433:
430:
429:
426:
425:
416:
406:
405:
398:
392:
391:
389:
372:the discussion
358:
346:
345:
334:
322:
321:
318:
317:
310:
304:
303:
301:
284:the discussion
271:
270:
254:
242:
241:
236:
224:
223:
217:
206:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
943:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
883:
881:
871:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
838:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
794:
793:
792:
790:
786:
782:
779:
778:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
750:
749:
745:
744:Safari Scribe
739:
734:
727:
725:
720:
715:
710:
709:
704:
686:
682:
678:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
638:
637:
636:
632:
628:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
571:
567:
566:
565:
561:
557:
553:
552:
551:
547:
543:
538:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
519:
518:
517:
516:
513:
509:
505:
500:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
484:
474:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
440:
439:
423:
422:
412:
408:
407:
403:
397:
394:
393:
390:
373:
369:
365:
364:
359:
356:
352:
351:
347:
343:
338:
335:
332:
328:
315:
309:
306:
305:
302:
285:
281:
277:
276:
268:
257:
255:
252:
248:
247:
243:
240:
237:
234:
230:
225:
221:
215:
207:
198:
197:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
869:
821:
795:
776:
775:
752:
732:
730:
718:
711:
536:
478:
465:
419:
361:
273:
267:China portal
220:WikiProjects
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
766:BarrelProof
724:move review
159:free images
42:not a forum
880:Categories
854:RodRabelo7
826:RodRabelo7
781:RodRabelo7
777:Relisting.
760:– or just
210:List-class
540:articles.
537:complete
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
578:Onward!
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
808:Wengier
796:Support
677:Wengier
627:Wengier
556:Wengier
523:Wengier
488:Wengier
165:WP refs
153:scholar
848:, and
840:Note:
733:moved.
614:Russia
216:scale.
137:Google
618:Burma
466:moved
452:from
450:moved
289:China
280:China
239:China
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
858:talk
830:talk
812:talk
785:talk
770:talk
681:talk
654:talk
646:talk
640:you!
631:talk
600:(or
584:talk
560:talk
546:talk
527:talk
508:talk
492:talk
464:was
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
604:),
483:CWH
456:to
396:???
342:Law
308:???
187:TWL
882::
860:)
844:,
832:)
814:)
787:)
774:—
756:→
716:.
683:)
656:)
650:ch
648:)
642:ch
633:)
620:,
616:,
608:,
586:)
580:ch
562:)
548:)
542:ch
529:)
510:)
504:ch
494:)
340::
167:)
65:;
856:(
828:(
810:(
783:(
768:(
740:)
736:(
679:(
652:(
644:(
629:(
582:(
558:(
544:(
525:(
506:(
490:(
481:@
468:.
424:.
404:.
316:.
222:.
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
