680:
site, so these claims are not going to be a problem to back up... My problem is simply with the number of citations (should I cite the claim that someone went to a certain college and graduated in a certain year? Most of those are covered by a single source, but there was additional research involved in many of them, to verify, e.g., that a corporate bio corresponded to the same person in the alumni directory). Meanwhile, colleges such as Wash U and
Georgetown, which I have recently paid some attention to, DO NOT GIVE ANY CITATIONS for their many many dubious claims. I am actually a Harvard graduate who has been a Professor at Wash U for twenty years working on legal databases and citation indexing (just using Georgetown for comparison) -- I have some idea about standards for factual research, professional publication and proper referencing, as well as an idea of what are typical standards of achievement. My article is well researched and it will just take time to recover the citations I found online, which I did not include because I thought I was following the extant wikipedia practices. Other similar articles (other private elite high schools and colleges) are often outrageously unsourced and misleading. OK, that's their problem and we can set a model of a well researched and documented article here. But it does feel as if my work is being unfairly targeted by someone who has an agenda. Admittedly, the agenda might be just to make the article better, which is a good thing. But really, has this editor had a look at other alumni pages? How do I request a third-party arbiter, or better, request that this editor go after some of these more offensive articles? For example, I have started adding an undergraduates-only alumni page whenever I see a college trying to obscure the nature of their graduates by mixing in degree-recipients from professional schools. They know how people judge an educational institution by its past people, and their PR people deliberately make this hard to see. To me, that's an unacceptable practice -- even before we talk about their missing citations!
822:
military, political, and art sections, I have allowed a lower standard for a son who has FOLLOWED in the footsteps of the father and has the same name, where the combined achievement is notable. This is useful not only because it disambiguates (e.g., it is simply truthful to note that our Gene
Smedley is not the Medal of Honor winner with the "same name"), but also because it paints the picture. Punahou isn't the place that crows about legacy Presidents' sons or daughters of Carnegies, but it does have a lot of people, esp. military, who achieve high rank after their parent is notable. This is itself interesting, I believe. I waffle over Jennifer Nicholson, who is mainly there just for gossip. On the other hand, she could not have been named Jack Nicholson, Jr. Ramler is a favorite of the people on campus, but his work at Nuremburg is eclipsed by many other graduates, as you have seen. We do have to be aware that as time has passed, many people's work becomes harder to find. If you blew a bubble in year 2005, it's on the net, but if you won a Silver Star in 1914, you're basically relying on an obituary to tell you that. This is quite obvious with doctors and professors, but that's sort of good, as those sections are there for balance, not so much for individual name recognition.
696:
depends on perspective. For example, when I first encountered the wikipedia
Punahou article, all I found was an extensive list of Olympians (which I left intact) and a list of actors and football players. That's one perspective. Some people don't care about authors, some don't care about doctors, some don't care about generals. I felt it was ok to take Farrington off the Punahou page, even though one wouldn't normally drop off an alum who served in the US Congress for a decade, because his name would appear on the longer list. Frankly, I didn't think he helped paint the picture of the school, but surely he belongs on some kind of encyclopedic alumni list. I defend the idea of two lists precisely because one is exclusive and the other inclusive, and the quality of the exclusive list is much improved by having access to the inclusive list. By their nature, it is the exclusive list that should have the higher standard of documentation exercised. So perhaps we should be looking at citations needed for the Punahou School page before contesting everything on the Punahou School alumni page.
1094:
philosophy, mathematics, computing and engineering" and I assume all of which are fields in STEM. On a side note, is there any particular order the sections are meant to be presented in? It begins with
Olympic athletes and follows up with Professional athletes and then into doctors and so forth. At first I would guess a list like this would be ordered alphabetically, and if not, then notability. But even the latter is not found in this case, or at least from my perspective. While Olympic athletes are definitely notable, wouldn't the alumni found in leadership positions be more well known to the general public? (Specifically, the "Civil rights leaders" and "Other elected representatives, government appointees, judges" sections.)
511:
athlete, politics, performer, and scholar tracks... there are others, and this is part of what distinguishes the school from eastern elite prep schools, which prefer very high level bankers, ambassadors, etc., but some do not have room for many artists and others do not produce a lot of athletes, etc.) Furthermore, as I discovered on a
Stanford page praising an early woman lawyer, Punahou has always expected as much from its women and minority populations as from its men and its majority populations. Or that is what was claimed by Rhoda Lewis. Since we can't list four Nobel prizewinners, three presidents, two billionaires, and a Hall of Famer, we end up with a long and diverse list if we want to paint an accurate picture.
634:
online. If we list three affiliations, we have three citations, plus the citation that the person attended (which thankfully is mostly under the umbrella of the alumni directory I am using). So what should be the guideline for what needs citation? It almost makes more sense to build a page for each person and put the required fact supporting citations on each such page. I am willing to do that, but it would clearly take some time.
867:
243:
222:
777:
That's on her wikipedia page. So it must be for her
Punahou School attendance, which is in the alumni directory. Unless you want me to cite this volume for each entry, we should remove some of these "citation needed" requests that simply contest whether the person went to Punahou. If you want, I can include attendance dates for EVERYONE, not just for non-graduates. That would seem to be overkill.
436:
253:
191:
348:
327:
358:
916:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
851:
I see someone added a link to
Reticker's obituary. That's nice, but it could be done for a lot of people who have a single authoritative biographical source. What should be the policy on using non-wikipedia URL's as linked text? It's very nice, since you can just click. On the other hand, it is a
679:
I would actually agree that all items in an online encyclopedia need sources, within reason (you can't reference in advance of all potential challenges, because not all challenges can be forseen). I see that referencing reputable online sources is acceptable practice, e.g. a US Swimming Hall of Fame
528:
On the timestamp: it looks like you're signing with only three tildas (~~~), which just adds your name. To timestamp, sign with four tildas (~~~~), which adds your name and a timestamp. If I misunderstand and you're actually typing in "]", you don't need to do that. Just put in the four consecutive
776:
All attendance claims are substantiated by the Alumni directory, except Coffey, as noted, and Watada, Camara, which come from wiki, and
Linebarger, which comes from an online biographer. So, for example, the "citation needed" for Sandy Plueger is for what? the 1984 Olumpic dressage participation?
1093:
I think the content is great, but I have a few questions for the organization for the page. Under the "Other leading educators and researchers" section what exactly is the "Science" sub-section supposed to encompass? It sounds a bit vague considering there's a sub-section right below it for "Logic,
695:
A bit more... My whole idea for a long alumni page like this is to keep the main article's list of major alumni cleaner and more stable. People can plop names in and out of the alumni page while recognizing that they don't rise to the top-50 or so that go on the school page. On the other hand, it
440:
506:
As I mentioned on your talk page, I agree this looks much better, and thank you again for the section re-division with contents. I want to keep the band of images on the main page as it gives a fair and a quick impression of the diversity of the
Punahou population. I do promise to come back and
548:
I see that an editor has come through and put many names in wikipedia-reference-brackets with full knowledge that there is no target page. What is the policy or best practice on such names? I've removed them in the past -- should all such names be in red? This seems to draw undue attention to
633:
I am really happy to provide citations, especially for obscure facts. But surely this page should not have 500-1000 references when it is ideally completed. A gold medal is quite easy to verify by any competent internet user. Meanwhile, a VP of a brokerage firm is inferred from SEC documents
510:
Thinking about why the list is long... well, of course I am being ridiculously thorough, and the standards are rising as I find more people (I am near the end of the L's in the 1991 alumni directory). But really, the school is old, large, and encourages many paths (you can see clear military,
821:
Yeah, I know where these are. There are actually quite a few... I'll get them. BTW, I agree completely about McCullough and Ramler. I inherited both from the former list-maker, which is what got me started. You know, you see something and say, surely a better list could be made. In the
761:
OK, that makes me feel better. I resolve to add articles and citations, and to raise standards. If I had not inherited such a long
Olympian list, I would never have started listing so many people in other categories. But obviously I have enjoyed doing the research.
522:
Just be careful that you're not copying all of the directory that is your source document; you don't want to risk copyright infringement. As long as you're using it as a source of information, and not copying its selection, coordination or arrangement, you should be
734:
for pointing these out. I see this as a rampant problem throughout much of wikipedia. Uncited claims are particularly problematic at High School articles, where students add "made up" names to "notable" lists regularly. An example of an exemplary alumni page is the
653:
I just have not gotten back to it, but this extensive cataloging of everyone "notable" who has ever graduated from Punahou needs to be verified with citations, or at the least, with wikipedia articles. This is pretty standard fare throughout wikipedia.
153:
836:
Yeah, the new stub looks great. Ideally, these references for the better candidates get moved to their own wikipedia pages. Some really need their own page (I couldn't believe Teri Ann Linn does not yet have her own page!).
637:
Why were some Olympians challenged for references and others not? I don't understand the criterion -- I can see asking for all medalists or all non-medalists, but there seems to be a mix of some but not all, of each kind.
1017:{{cite news| url=http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/15/AR2005101500102_pf.html | work=The Washington Post | title=The Fear Contagion | first=Wendy | last=Orent | accessdate=May 22, 2010}}</ref: -->
603:
An example of doing this well is what you did in finding a newspaper article verifying Duncan Macdonald. Perhaps you might slow down on listing large numbers of people and begin working on listing people with
913:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
488:
for an example of what I propose. In retrospect, this was probably not the best candidate to use, because the "Golf" category has only four entries. I also added one for Barack Obama at
852:
bit misleading. I've been to pages where all the alumni are linked, giving the impression that all have wikipedia pages. But that was just how they did their references/citations...
147:
1014:'29* Edwin D. Kilbourne, Jr. (UH) — founding chair of Microbiology at ], ] expert at ], '']'s'' "We don't have enough if a pandemic happened tomorrow." (attended 1921-28)<ref: -->
377:, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
44:
641:
As it stands, it almost seems like the request for citations is a kind of harassment or vandalism by someone who doesn't want the information to be made public!
1018:(scholar.google best ~ 497) This is not the Edwin D. Kilbourne who attended Punahou. The one who did practiced general medicine in Saratoga and Los Gatos, CA
969:
959:
79:
894:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
452:
412:
1159:
1149:
891:
402:
309:
299:
918:
910:
906:
883:
85:
1121:? A culling of this list is in order. (And to encourage editors to seriously look at this article I've revised the project assessments.) –
168:
1154:
736:
135:
1144:
996:
922:
549:
people who are sometimes, but not always, less interesting than those who have their own wikipedia pages. 04:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
507:
prune the scholars pages based on citation data (but ISI is more authoritative than scholar.google, and ISI takes more time to do).
275:
565:
129:
99:
30:
1061:
Citation is not completely correct, not sure why extra 1 is showing and don't want to fix it until I break it. Back tomorrow
1077:
439:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
104:
20:
378:
372:
332:
125:
74:
24:
985:
266:
227:
202:
65:
175:
578:, wherein we list people who are verifiable in their noteworthiness. Verifiability can be learned about by reading
932:
947:
579:
109:
141:
489:
485:
208:
902:
874:
1126:
1065:
575:
561:
553:
878:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
928:
161:
55:
1117:. Every person that has the least bit of news about them is included in the listing. But are they
274:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1099:
1073:
1047:
1030:
1025:
879:
460:
70:
1118:
1114:
717:
534:
493:
476:
51:
1130:
1103:
1081:
1051:
1000:
936:
856:
841:
826:
816:
790:
781:
766:
755:
700:
684:
670:
647:
620:
598:
537:
496:
479:
464:
1122:
992:
853:
838:
823:
787:
778:
763:
697:
681:
644:
557:
515:
962:
linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
955:
363:
866:
1138:
1095:
1069:
1043:
951:
786:
Why is any citation needed for Francis Wai beyond what is on his own wikipedia page?
530:
456:
444:
258:
958:
when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an
895:
801:
740:
655:
605:
583:
435:
1042:, the person described above has no connection with Hawaii, let alone Punahou.
353:
248:
242:
221:
475:
Any objection to moving the images near the individuals they depict? --
271:
954:, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the
722:
and here is what Taft School lists on their main page, for example:
529:
tildas and it will generate the username and timestamp for you. See
725:
347:
326:
975:
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
574:
The listing of people on wikipedia falls under the purview of
184:
15:
972:
on the image's description page for the use in this article.
865:
718:
http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_Washington_University_alumni
890:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
942:
Image copyright problem with Image:BusterCrabbe 01.jpg
800:
I can't seem to find anything on this person. Help! --
726:
http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Taft_School#Notable_alumni
490:
Punahou School Alumni#US Congressional Representatives
160:
430:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
921:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
739:. Thanks for your efforts, diligence and patience.
492:, which is a little more aesthetically pleasing.--
1026:"Edwin Kilbourne, Flu Vaccine Expert, Dies at 90"
1022:Based on the cited sources & this obituary:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
995:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
514:RP Loui 10/16/07 -- how do I timestamp this?
981:The following images also have this problem:
174:
8:
711:Here is the Wash U almni page, for example:
847:Links to non-wikipedia authoritative pages
321:
216:
190:
188:
950:is used in this article under a claim of
453:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
862:Fair use rationale for Image:Shane62.jpg
1113:Really this listing is a clear case of
451:Above undated message substituted from
323:
218:
911:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
7:
737:List of Texas Tech University people
264:This article is within the scope of
997:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
986:Image:Josephriderfarringtontime.jpg
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
909:. Using one of the templates at
484:See the Michelle Wie example at
434:
356:
346:
325:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
991:This is an automated notice by
407:This article has been rated as
304:This article has been rated as
1160:Low-importance school articles
1150:Low-importance Hawaii articles
1024:Martin, Douglas (2011-02-24).
923:Media copyright questions page
1:
1131:06:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
1104:01:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
892:boilerplate fair use template
531:WP:SIG#How to sign your posts
518:(at 16:14, October 16, 2007)
387:Knowledge:WikiProject Schools
278:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
25:List of Punahou School alumni
1052:00:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
956:requirements for such images
937:22:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
919:criteria for speedy deletion
857:20:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
842:19:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
827:18:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
817:19:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
791:10:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
782:10:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
767:20:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
756:20:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
701:19:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
685:19:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
671:06:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
648:04:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
621:13:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
599:13:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
538:23:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
497:21:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
480:20:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
465:02:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
390:Template:WikiProject Schools
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Hawaii
1155:WikiProject Hawaii articles
369:This article is related to
287:Template:WikiProject Hawaii
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1176:
1145:List-Class Hawaii articles
903:the image description page
486:Punahou School Alumni#Golf
413:project's importance scale
310:project's importance scale
1089:Groupings within the List
1010:I removed the following:
948:Image:BusterCrabbe 01.jpg
905:and edit it to include a
406:
341:
303:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1082:23:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
1001:01:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
884:explanation or rationale
772:Citations for Attendance
580:Knowledge:Verifiability
970:non-free use rationale
870:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
886:as to why its use in
869:
100:Neutral point of view
576:Knowledge:Notability
105:No original research
533:for more info. --
443:. Peer reviewers:
373:WikiProject Schools
1109:Non-notable people
1031:The New York Times
907:fair use rationale
871:
441:on the course page
267:WikiProject Hawaii
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1085:
1068:comment added by
875:Image:Shane62.jpg
796:H. Wells Lawrence
570:
556:comment added by
427:
426:
423:
422:
419:
418:
320:
319:
316:
315:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1167:
1084:
1062:
1041:
1039:
1038:
968:That there is a
882:but there is no
813:
811:
809:
752:
750:
748:
667:
665:
663:
629:Citations needed
617:
615:
613:
595:
593:
591:
569:
550:
544:Red-letter names
467:
438:
395:
394:
391:
388:
385:
366:
361:
360:
359:
350:
343:
342:
337:
329:
322:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
261:
256:
255:
254:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1135:
1134:
1111:
1091:
1063:
1059:
1036:
1034:
1023:
1008:
944:
864:
849:
834:
807:
805:
803:
798:
774:
746:
744:
742:
661:
659:
657:
631:
611:
609:
607:
604:verification.--
589:
587:
585:
551:
546:
516:User:Ronaldloui
504:
473:
471:Image locations
450:
432:
393:school articles
392:
389:
386:
383:
382:
362:
357:
355:
335:
290:Hawaii articles
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
257:
252:
250:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1173:
1171:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1137:
1136:
1110:
1107:
1090:
1087:
1058:
1055:
1020:
1019:
1007:
1004:
989:
988:
979:
978:
977:
976:
973:
943:
940:
929:BetacommandBot
863:
860:
848:
845:
833:
830:
797:
794:
773:
770:
759:
758:
715:
714:
713:
712:
706:
705:
704:
703:
690:
689:
688:
687:
674:
673:
630:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
545:
542:
541:
540:
525:
524:
503:
500:
472:
469:
431:
428:
425:
424:
421:
420:
417:
416:
409:Low-importance
405:
399:
398:
396:
368:
367:
364:Schools portal
351:
339:
338:
336:Low‑importance
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
306:Low-importance
302:
296:
295:
293:
276:the discussion
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1172:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1142:
1140:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1115:WP:BOOSTERism
1108:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1056:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1033:
1032:
1027:
1015:</ref: -->
1013:
1012:
1011:
1006:The wrong man
1005:
1003:
1002:
998:
994:
987:
984:
983:
982:
974:
971:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
961:
957:
953:
949:
941:
939:
938:
934:
930:
926:
925:. Thank you.
924:
920:
914:
912:
908:
904:
901:Please go to
899:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
876:
868:
861:
859:
858:
855:
846:
844:
843:
840:
831:
829:
828:
825:
819:
818:
815:
814:
795:
793:
792:
789:
784:
783:
780:
771:
769:
768:
765:
757:
754:
753:
738:
733:
730:
729:
728:
727:
723:
720:
719:
710:
709:
708:
707:
702:
699:
694:
693:
692:
691:
686:
683:
678:
677:
676:
675:
672:
669:
668:
652:
651:
650:
649:
646:
642:
639:
635:
628:
622:
619:
618:
602:
601:
600:
597:
596:
581:
577:
573:
572:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
543:
539:
536:
535:Terry Carroll
532:
527:
526:
521:
520:
519:
517:
512:
508:
501:
499:
498:
495:
494:Terry Carroll
491:
487:
482:
481:
478:
477:Terry Carroll
470:
468:
466:
462:
458:
454:
448:
446:
442:
437:
429:
414:
410:
404:
401:
400:
397:
380:
376:
375:
374:
365:
354:
352:
349:
345:
344:
340:
334:
331:
328:
324:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
259:Hawaii portal
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1112:
1092:
1064:— Preceding
1060:
1035:. Retrieved
1029:
1021:
1016:<ref: -->
1009:
990:
980:
945:
927:
915:
900:
887:
873:
872:
850:
835:
820:
802:
799:
785:
775:
760:
741:
731:
724:
721:
716:
656:
643:
640:
636:
632:
606:
584:
547:
513:
509:
505:
483:
474:
449:
433:
408:
379:project page
371:
370:
305:
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1057:S. Pfleuger
960:explanation
552:—Preceding
148:free images
31:not a forum
1139:Categories
1119:WP:NOTABLE
1037:2016-01-13
993:FairuseBot
946:The image
854:Ronaldloui
839:Ronaldloui
824:Ronaldloui
788:Ronaldloui
779:Ronaldloui
764:Ronaldloui
698:Ronaldloui
682:Ronaldloui
645:Ronaldloui
558:Ronaldloui
199:List-class
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1096:Ntakamat
1078:contribs
1070:BobDog54
1066:unsigned
1044:Peaceray
952:fair use
896:fair use
880:fair use
566:contribs
554:unsigned
502:Response
457:PrimeBOT
445:Ntakamat
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1123:S. Rich
411:on the
384:Schools
333:Schools
308:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
732:Thanks
281:Hawaii
272:Hawaii
228:Hawaii
205:scale.
126:Google
832:Warch
523:okay.
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1127:talk
1100:talk
1074:talk
1048:talk
999:. --
933:talk
888:this
582:. --
562:talk
461:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
455:by
403:Low
300:Low
176:TWL
1141::
1129:)
1102:)
1080:)
1076:•
1050:)
1028:.
935:)
898:.
812:ni
751:ni
666:ni
654:--
616:ni
594:ni
568:)
564:•
463:)
447:.
156:)
54:;
1125:(
1098:(
1072:(
1046:(
1040:.
931:(
810:i
808:k
806:u
804:K
749:i
747:k
745:u
743:K
664:i
662:k
660:u
658:K
614:i
612:k
610:u
608:K
592:i
590:k
588:u
586:K
560:(
459:(
415:.
381:.
312:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
