Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:List of bioinformatics companies

Source 📝

302: 943: 852: 724: 583: 246: 222: 883: 191: 796: 1069:
This thing was looking like a Google click add. The list isn't for providing all info, it is just to list the companies. I think I've been generous in leaving the superfluous text that I left, mainly being specific product names so they would show up in a search here. Being a list, it should only
980:
I'm I the only one that thinks this list is a ridiculous mess of redlinks? There is nothing on this page that indicates the redlinks are notable. Seriously, I could just invent 100 fake names and put them in as redlinks and no one would be the wiser. This tells me that the redlinks likely need to
700:
Please add the following companies Gene Logic, and Ocimum Biosolutions to this list. Gene Logic www.genelogic.com - Creators of BioExpress, ToxExpress and Ascenta ( Proprietary Gene Expression databases and Toxicogenomics database called ToxExpress) Ocimum Biosolutions www.ocimumbio.com - Provides
463:
I would like to add a link to Genostar company which is one of the most well-known bioinformatic company. My contribution has been deleted sevral time, and some users suggest to open a discussion on this page. So here it is. Here is what I would like to add :
1011:
Good job. I wanted to give a little time on the off chance someone was in the middle of a major expansion, or there was some reason I just hadn't thought of why a list of redlinks would be a good thing... Much better now, thanks for the effort.
153: 1051:
I've stripped all the spam out of the listings. We don't need a bloody breakdown of everything the company does, the article can cover that, we just need a single sentence that defines them in the most general way.
996:
I was bold for you. The 'current' version was marked up by a new editor, who greatly expanded the list with redlinks with no real indication where they were getting it from. I reverted back to the prior version.
368:
And, at the very least, the introduction needs to be re-written. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't do "holding places", and lists of pages-to-create are metadata which belong on a talk or project page, not a live entry.
352:
that lack articles ought to be removed. Of course, nothing prevents someone from writing a properly-sourced article on a bioinformatics company. If that were done, then its inclusion would be justified.
311: 292: 232: 147: 573:
is a cloud-based solution that enables sequencing centers and scientists to perform analyses, visualize results and manage next-generation DNA sequencing data – all from any web browser.
44: 624: 1111: 1101: 772: 771:
The pages are present within Knowledge (XXG), however you can also use the following link for information about Vector NTI if you would like an external reference for the software:
316: 286: 1070:
provide extra info if it is adding actual meaning. It should NOT be describing the company's mission, that is what the article is for. All this market speak needs to stay out.
339:"The primary purpose of this list is to serve as a holding place for the identities of Bioinformatics companies, particularly those for which articles have not yet been created." 566:
Please add DNAnexus to your list; DNAnexus launched its commercial cloud-based bioinformatics solution in April 2010 (www.DNAnexus.com). Entry text (between CLCbio and DNAStar:
348:. The editors there are enforcing a rule that no search engine can be in the list unless it has a Knowledge (XXG) article. In my opinion, all the entries presently included in 1116: 1106: 1029:
VALDO is not a bioinformatics company at all. If we go to the webpage, you can see nothing else than advertising... I highly suggest to delete the link from this page...
1121: 262: 1096: 672:
Just want to reopen consideration for adding DNAnexus to this list, a notable firm worth including. Links above should support the case. Thanks in advance. --
79: 341:
I don't believe this is appropriate. If a company is not notable enough for an article, there is no reason for it to be included in a Knowledge (XXG) list.
253: 227: 639: 768:
a desktop bioinformatics suite supporting data record handling and curation, data discovery, reagent design and experimental validation tool sets.
85: 773:
http://www.invitrogen.com/site/us/en/home/LINNEA-Online-Guides/LINNEA-Communities/Vector-NTI-Community/vector-nti-software/what-is-vector-NTI.html
168: 135: 701:
several bioinformatics software products like Genowiz, Genchek, Optgene, iRNAchek, Oligostar and offers Bioinformatics consulting services (
1036: 518: 422: 30: 913: 673: 656: 730:
Only one of those companies currently has an article here and that article seems to fail the criteria for inclusion. Please provide
99: 436:
List is now sorted. This isn't automatic, but not hard to do either. Of course the big problem is that many of the entries are from
104: 20: 129: 506: 349: 24: 74: 202: 125: 65: 301: 694: 559: 175: 407:
Would not make sense to sort this list alphabetically? Is there an automatic way of doing this in Knowledge (XXG)? --
633:
DNAnexus Debuts Cloud Computing Resource for Next-Gen Sequence Data at Bio-IT World Expo Bio-IT World, May 18, 2010
963: 889: 638:
DNAnexus Aims to Alleviate Next-Gen Sequence Analysis Headache with Cloud-based Service GenomeWeb, April 20, 2010
109: 1040: 426: 208: 141: 917: 802:
Seems good to me, so added. I used the wikilink, as the company link wouldn't really be appropriate here per
677: 1032: 644: 623:
DNAnexus Seeks to Capitalize on Data Pile-Up, as Leader in Genomic Analysis Software Xconomy, July 7, 2010
494: 1077: 1053: 1017: 986: 652: 345: 55: 261:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
648: 70: 784: 780: 502: 480: 358: 950: 708: 629: 412: 161: 1002: 981:
go, and I'm very tempted to just get WP:BOLD and trim the fat, which would be most of the list.
932: 836: 811: 712: 615:--sanot 22:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Here are a number of links to articles that should qualify: 373: 634: 619: 1082: 1058: 1044: 1021: 1006: 990: 967: 936: 921: 867: 858:
this is a list of articles on the wiki. Neither Medha nor Apticraft currently have articles. —
844: 815: 788: 742: 716: 681: 660: 608: 541: 510: 449: 430: 416: 394: 376: 362: 1071: 1013: 982: 739: 603: 537: 484: 472: 258: 51: 735: 590: 863: 840: 445: 390: 437: 498: 476: 354: 245: 221: 957:
to this page to support this and re-activate the template as described above. Thanks. --
803: 731: 618:
Next-Gen Sequencing Software: The Present and the Future Bio-IT World, September 28, 2010
734:
that verify the notability of these companies. The most appropriate criteria is likely
408: 954: 594: 529: 522: 1090: 998: 928: 807: 370: 628:
Next-generation sequencing: adjusting to data overload Nature Methods, July 1, 2010
599: 533: 859: 597:. Do you have third-party sources on DNAnexus to demostrate notability? Thanks, 441: 386: 765: 761: 521:. If you think this company should be included in this list you need to show 958: 490:
I think that it is as relevant as other link (Genomatix, DNAStar, ...etc)
421:
A lot of these so-called 'free' software companies are not free, e.g. CLC
702: 877: 184: 15: 385:
I've re-written the lead to eliminate all meta-references. --
831: 300: 468: 828: 570: 487:
analysis, modeling and simulation of biological networks
160: 910:
I would be add our company DCAD Data Analysis Center
475:, mapping, annotation transfer and identification of 949:
we have no way of knowing if the company passes our
257:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 174: 291:This article has not yet received a rating on the 927:Does your company have an article on wikipedia? 593:before they are added to the list to demostrate 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 553:Edit request from Colinsanford, 8 November 2010 471:provides streamlined bioinformatics solutions: 1112:Mid-importance Computational Biology articles 1102:Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles 874:Edit request from 213.231.192.5, 1 April 2011 777:Please contact me if you have any questions. 271:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Molecular Biology 8: 519:Knowledge (XXG) is not a collection of links 749:Edit request from MadraghRua, 15 March 2011 344:For how things are done elsewhere, see the 1117:WikiProject Computational Biology articles 440:that aren't very familiar with editing. -- 216: 190: 188: 1107:List-Class Computational Biology articles 687:Edit request from Biotechp, 2 March 2011 1122:All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages 821:Edit request from Amoghb, 19 March 2011 758:Please add the following to this page: 218: 274:Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology 1097:List-Class Molecular Biology articles 7: 312:the Computational Biology task force 251:This article is within the scope of 577:sanot 19:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 953:; if you feel it does, please add 14: 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 941: 881: 850: 829:Medha Innovation and Development 804:the guidelines on external links 794: 722: 581: 350:List of bioinformatics companies 244: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 25:List of bioinformatics companies 703:http://www.ocimumbio.com/bioit/ 1059:13:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC) 1: 1045:18:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 682:15:22, 12 November 2010 (UTC) 309:This article is supported by 265:and see a list of open tasks. 254:WikiProject Molecular Biology 42:Put new text under old text. 661:22:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 609:22:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 904:to reactivate your request. 892:has been answered. Set the 450:17:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 417:15:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 395:17:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 377:17:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 363:15:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 1138: 1083:14:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC) 868:03:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 845:09:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC) 816:01:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC) 789:19:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 591:article written about them 542:11:50, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 511:11:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 277:Molecular Biology articles 1022:20:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 1007:11:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 991:23:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 968:10:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC) 937:11:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 922:11:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 743:07:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 717:05:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 308: 290: 239: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 431:17:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 826:{{edit semi-protected}} 755:{{edit semi-protected}} 589:Entries should have an 483:, structural searches, 438:single-purpose accounts 668:Add a link to DNAnexus 459:Add a link to Genostar 346:List of search engines 305: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 951:notability guidelines 304: 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 736:Knowledge (XXG):CORP 481:comparative genomics 105:No original research 695:edit semi-protected 560:edit semi-protected 306: 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1065:Trim descriptions 1035:comment added by 908: 907: 832:Apticraft Systems 664: 647:comment added by 606: 514: 497:comment added by 485:metabolic pathway 473:sequence assembly 331: 330: 327: 326: 323: 322: 268:Molecular Biology 259:Molecular Biology 228:Molecular Biology 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1129: 1047: 955:reliable sources 945: 944: 899: 895: 885: 884: 878: 854: 853: 827: 798: 797: 757: 756: 732:reliable sources 726: 725: 699: 693: 663: 641: 602: 585: 584: 563: 548:after a comment. 544:through placing 513: 491: 293:importance scale 279: 278: 275: 272: 269: 248: 241: 240: 235: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1087: 1086: 1067: 1030: 978: 966: 942: 897: 893: 882: 876: 851: 825: 823: 795: 754: 753: 751: 723: 697: 691: 689: 670: 642: 582: 567: 557: 555: 492: 488: 477:protein domains 461: 405: 336: 276: 273: 270: 267: 266: 230: 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1135: 1133: 1125: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1089: 1088: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1037:132.216.111.34 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 977: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 962: 906: 905: 886: 875: 872: 871: 870: 822: 819: 793: 750: 747: 746: 745: 688: 685: 669: 666: 614: 612: 611: 575: 574: 565: 554: 551: 550: 549: 466: 460: 457: 455: 453: 452: 423:193.190.172.82 404: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 380: 379: 335: 332: 329: 328: 325: 324: 321: 320: 317:Mid-importance 307: 297: 296: 289: 283: 282: 280: 263:the discussion 249: 237: 236: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1134: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1092: 1085: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1074: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 992: 988: 984: 975: 969: 965: 960: 956: 952: 948: 940: 939: 938: 934: 930: 926: 925: 924: 923: 919: 915: 914:213.231.192.5 911: 903: 900:parameter to 891: 887: 880: 879: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 849: 848: 847: 846: 842: 838: 834: 833: 830: 820: 818: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 791: 790: 786: 782: 778: 775: 774: 769: 767: 763: 759: 748: 744: 741: 737: 733: 729: 721: 720: 719: 718: 714: 710: 706: 704: 696: 686: 684: 683: 679: 675: 674:67.86.220.116 667: 665: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 640: 636: 635: 631: 630: 626: 625: 621: 620: 616: 610: 607: 605: 601: 596: 592: 588: 580: 579: 578: 572: 569: 568: 564: 561: 552: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 528: 524: 520: 517: 516: 515: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 465: 458: 456: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 434: 433: 432: 428: 424: 419: 418: 414: 410: 402: 396: 392: 388: 384: 383: 382: 381: 378: 375: 372: 367: 366: 365: 364: 360: 356: 351: 347: 342: 340: 333: 318: 315:(assessed as 314: 313: 303: 299: 298: 294: 288: 285: 284: 281: 264: 260: 256: 255: 250: 247: 243: 242: 238: 234: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1078: 1073:Dennis Brown 1072: 1068: 1054: 1031:— Preceding 1028: 1014:Dennis Brown 983:Dennis Brown 979: 946: 912: 909: 901: 890:edit request 855: 835: 824: 799: 792: 779: 776: 770: 760: 752: 727: 707: 690: 671: 649:Colinsanford 637: 632: 627: 622: 617: 613: 598: 586: 576: 556: 545: 532:. Signed by 526: 489: 462: 454: 420: 406: 343: 338: 337: 310: 252: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 976:Bloody mess 643:—Preceding 493:—Preceding 148:free images 31:not a forum 1091:Categories 894:|answered= 806:. Thanks! 781:MadraghRua 766:Vector NTI 762:Invitrogen 523:notability 499:Pierocielo 355:EdJohnston 199:List-class 947:Not done: 856:Not done: 764:provides 728:Not done: 595:notabilty 587:Not done: 530:citations 409:Oleginger 334:Red links 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1033:unsigned 999:Syrthiss 929:Syrthiss 808:Qwyrxian 709:Biotechp 657:contribs 645:unsigned 571:DNAnexus 507:contribs 495:unsigned 469:Genostar 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 600:Stickee 534:Mootros 525:though 403:Sorting 233:COMPBIO 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1055:Dennis 860:Bility 837:Amoghb 604:(talk) 442:RL0919 387:RL0919 205:scale. 126:Google 898:|ans= 888:This 740:Shell 527:sound 371:Joe D 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1041:talk 1018:talk 1003:talk 987:talk 959:gtdp 933:talk 918:talk 864:talk 841:talk 812:talk 800:Done 785:talk 713:talk 678:talk 653:talk 546:~~~~ 538:talk 503:talk 446:talk 427:talk 413:talk 391:talk 359:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 964:(C) 896:or 374:(t) 287:??? 176:TWL 1093:: 1079:2¢ 1076:- 1043:) 1020:) 1005:) 989:) 935:) 920:) 902:no 866:) 843:) 814:) 787:) 738:. 715:) 705:) 698:}} 692:{{ 680:) 659:) 655:• 562:}} 558:{{ 540:) 509:) 505:• 479:, 448:) 429:) 415:) 393:) 361:) 319:). 231:: 156:) 54:; 1039:( 1016:( 1001:( 985:( 961:/ 931:( 916:( 862:( 839:( 810:( 783:( 711:( 676:( 651:( 536:( 501:( 467:* 444:( 425:( 411:( 389:( 357:( 295:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
List of bioinformatics companies
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Molecular Biology
COMPBIO
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Molecular Biology

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.