Talk:List of digital library projects

1887:

to use something more or less similar to our concept of notability. It would be possible to have lists on other grounds, and we might do so here: we might have for example a list of National digital libraries that includes the principal national DL for each country regardless of whether it would meet WP:N. Similarly for US states. In terms of splitting the list, either of them would seem a worthwhile project, and I would be prepared to argue they pass NOT DIRECTORY by being limited to these higher-order entities, not , for example, all cities in the world. In fact, I suggested, at Gavia did not reject, the concept that we could include DLs where the link was to a section of an article, not an entire article. This is a unique type of subject, and the approach needs to be somewhat similar to

1724:

minutes I will even read the sections above this on the talk page and that they will say something about it being a big job to clean the list up. It really isn't; we're not a directory of external links, not even well-meaning ones, and we aren't a research service either, even though we might be sympathetic to such things. Anything without an article or reference also has no claim of notability - so I have removed everything without either an article or a reference, which turned out to be most of the list. The resulting list probably still needs work, but working on the reduced list should be much easier.

1440:

for arXiv, and PMC, for example. One could do it for LC's National Memory. If owe are going to go somewhat wider, then, a good many of them have wp articles, and thus certainly can be justified. I do not think we could write wp articles to show the notability of every one of them, but we could for probably 1/3 to 2/3 of what's here. That always justifies inclusion on a list of notable anything. . Beyond there, i can certainly propose specific criteria, such as the main national database for each country. Gavin, how about a positive approach: keep the list, and start writing articles?

1788:

the least likely, but I admit I haven't gotten around to this, so I can hardly complain. I'm still concerned about a few dozen ones still here and several dozen removed where the institutions only are linked, but not the project; I think the way to handle such is to first, verify that the project is significant, in the sense of having a major amount of material, or notable for its plans, and then writing a section on the project, and linking to that.

2177: 361: 340: 1345:, and therefore fall outside the scope of Knowledge (XXG). It seems to me that compiling our own lists based on your opinion as to which one goes where is more or less original research, and would tend to invite more of the same. At the end of the day, you can't use lists as a dump for non-notable content. Better to scrap the list altogether and salvage the more notable digital library links by starting new articles for them. -- 1978: 268: 250: 433: 2709: 219: 1122:

acceptable articles or redirects. Commercial organisations providing vanity published material are not, along with miscellaneous web enterprising repackaging material from other sites. In between, I'm not sure. I'm prepared to include for special subjects whatever is the most important collection, even if otherwise less than optimum. Again, i think notability could be shown for these.

2187: 2999: 1805:

engagement with this topic. On the subject of editing styles - I have no problem with the slow, careful approach, and I use it myself most of the time, but I really have had good results with the clear-cutting approach that I used here as well. It is mostly a matter of just being willing to do it, but I understand perfectly well why most editors are not willing to be

190: 1728:

will just attract more inappropriate content - of which there was a lot. Requiring notability from the start is the best way to keep such things out. In the meantime, please remember that the page history is still available - if my clear-cutting approach caught something it shouldn't have, it can be rescued very easily. Most of it, however, should stay gone.

2498: 1627:

prepared to argue if necessary that our criteria here should be very general, and our purpose is to give the best possible links within each special area. This is one of the places for exceptions--this is core material for us in many different respects. The proper contents of this page, as I see it, should be:

1886:

Right. Lists need some defined scope, and the key problem with a list of this sort is NOT DIRECTORY. for other sorts of lists we can make them to include subnotable topics not worth an article but with a clear criterion for inclusion, such as the list of characters in a literary work. The other is

1727:

I encourage anyone who sees an obvious omission from the current list to add it if it has an article, or if notability can be established independently (but we're not a directory of external links, so much better if it has an article). I don't encourage adding bare external links again, because they

1439:

If we are going to do just the most notable as example, the WP articles are a guide, along with the sources for them. I mention project G, because its easy to show by excellent secondary sources that it's exceedingly notable and the pioneering and most important db of its sort. One could do the same

1316:

the meaning of the various types are perfectly clear to me, as they will be to anyone discussing it here, but I do not think they will be the least clear to most readers. There needs to be more of a discussion for each, and i think that there do have to be examples. The examples should be the 2 or 3

1300:

There could and should be lists for each of the categories--as a general rule any category of discrete things should have a list. The links here should link to those lists, not to the categories. We will of course have similar problems watching them. The best way is to stick to the rule that they

1121:

I am not proposing a finished statement. I am trying to approach it from both ends: At the extremes: National libraries, major state libraries, the star quality academic and special libraries, and the main academic or research societies in a subject are included--for all of these I know I can write

2857:

It is similar to some of her material here, and I see no reason why it should not be added. --the only problem is that it is hard to describe--some small part of it is about Afghanistan, as distinct from general subjects, most of which are not targeted for Afghanistan . Most of the material seems

1769:

Thank you. I've taken this same approach before with other large and seemingly unmanageable lists, and it really is the way forward when there seems to be no way forward, because large lists tend to cause a sort of intellectual paralysis at the thought of trying to work with them. Smaller lists are

1212:

I disagree, that edit seemed to have cleared things up for the better. This page in its current state is little more than a respository of spam and inappropriate external links. At the very least, entries without specific articles shouldn't be here as we are a discriminate encyclopedia. Yourrevert

2290:

Now, since AAARGH is notable enough to have it’s own article on Knowledge (XXG), I wonder if it should be included in this article. The question is:is this list a non-partisan list that includes the AAARGH-site, or should we exclude piles of rubbish-books and demand some quality standards here? (I

1857:

I did read the discussion above, as I said, after I had made the edit in question. I don't believe it would have stopped me from making the same bold edit if I had read the discussion beforehand, though. I appreciate editors trying to salvage "usefulness" out of the previous list, and I agree that

1787:

I have added back a very few that are clearly important and which I am pretty sure I can write articles on. When I have done them , I shall try to go on. I think this will be possible for about 1/3 of the ones that were removed. Myself, I take the opposite approach, of removing incrementally from

1236:

I see no spam there. I see a list of things that seem to be digital library projects. Without a clear criteria of inclusion, that is what you get. I'd say bravo too, but... alas there was no discussion, nor justification, just deletion of content. perhaps he was recategorizing it, perhaps the

897:

Normally I would say that each listing in articles like this ought to have a corresponding individual article, and that we would therefore not need the external links, but in this particular case there are many such projects that need & deserve mention here, and we can not keep up with them in

1866:

hard and fast criterion for inclusion or exclusion, and it's no surprise that editors will think of this broadly in terms of the Knowledge (XXG)-jargon term "notability". Whatever you call it, it is much easier to enforce this on a small, undersized list than a huge sprawling one, even if in the

1723:

I have no history at all with this page before today, but I have been chasing down external links to Knowledge (XXG) mirrors and forks where they don't belong, and this is one of the pages that popped up. I see the article has been tagged for various things since 2008, and I expect that in a few

1459:

I have found this list quite useful in my digital library work. Please don't eviscerate it simply for policy's sake. In particular, I have not found that the list, as I used it, was full of spam, and the categorizations (and inclusion of sites and organizations not yet graced with their own WP

1319:

This is not quite as easy a problem as it appears. I am not even sure that this should not be an exception to the principle of not being a web directory--the rationale is that the purposes of these projects is very close to the purpose of our own. I think we could and should have fairly complete

740:

I think we should be very reluctant to includee collections at individual libraries--I would argue for a certain major level of notability, such that Akron-Summit County Public Library's Digital Exhibits is not included. There's a distinction between a notable digital library project, and a mere

1533:

This is a good idea, but it's a separate project, because there should be a focus upon the actual user needs here. Be aware that not all of these are of free projects, or even those with open access. . The present article should include major projects without regard to practical use here, and,

1362:

verifiable evidence with this list is just a web search away, from press releases to academic journals you'll find almost all of them substantiated with little effort. However, few of them rise to the level of needing a full article and would be stubs, which is why people make lists, to avoid

1086:

I've just looked at the recently deleted ones, and some really should go back,. National library sites are notable. The projects at Berkeley, Cornell, Beinecke!! are notable. LANL & NIST are notable. I'm not restoring them immediately, because some should go in particular sections, not the

1626:

of course we should fix the incorrect links, and remove the obsolete. no quarrel with that. The presence of redlinks is appropriate, for it indicates projects for which we should have articles.Even for alumni/employee etc lists, we include those for which there clearly can be an article. I am

1804:

I don't oppose readding things you believe are important; on the contrary, I hope you will do it. With the reduction in size, it should be much easier to judge whether individual items really belong here, and in any case I trust your judgement. I have to, since I as I said I have no previous

1264:

for many years. It's a huge spam magnet, as the history clearly shows. An AfD attempt has failed. I tried to generate discussion over the rewrite, but failed. If anyone has any better suggestion, I'm all for it, but a rewrite like this is the only way I can see to bring the page in line with

1639:

4. Major university collections--some of these are key resources by any standard. Wedo not yet have articles, but they should not be hard to justify. This, as well as #3, should be grouped geographically by country. A suitable place to link to should of course be placed in the appropriate

2286:

website, that promotes itself as a holocaust-research-site with a large collection of books on it’s site. Most of these books can easily be described as “very unsavoury stuff.” If someone would look for a reliable source for an article on WP, I wouldn’t advise to look at the AAARGH-site.

1050:

unable to see the rule that says there should be no red links - the need, one would imagine, is that the links essentially be to articles that either exist or should exist. A lot of content on wikipedia is structured using lists and articles are subsequently added to remove red links.

1090:

A reasonable way to proceed would be to first remove those not sponsored by major institutions & not affiliated with them or with other notable projects. Ronz, please slow down. It takes time to write these articles, given the very small number of interested editors.

2858:

to be in English, with some in Pashto, Farsi or other Afghan languages. The introductory material on their web site does not seem to mention these limitations, so it would be a good idea to write an article about the project as well as entering it here.

1558:

A few days back I continued the cleanup that earlier editors started, deleting redlinks and external links, but before I continued too much further, I wanted to lay out my rationale (much of which echoes earlier comments on this talk page), so here goes:

676:

Though I have found no firm statements, East of the Web appears to be inactive. Its copyright dates end in 2003 and there has been nothing in the "New Titles" section for some time. Should we perhaps place a note beside the link in this article?

1383:

There is no problem with lists that have redlinks to notable topics, it's an invitation for people to develop articles, and I agree with Buridan that most if not all of the items on the list are notable if one takes the time to actually seek out

1684:, and instead use the wikiproject or user spaces to keep track of unwritten articles." That said, I'll await the opinions of the involved editors before we decide how to proceed on that particular step, while moving forward on the other fixes. 914:

The argument that there are too many projects to keep up with doesn't hold water givin this (WP) is a collaborative-based project where there is no shortage of people/energy (let alone bots) to create articles, and that's no reason to create a

1647:

5. Each of the leading or key ones for subject areas. Where the subject area is the specific language or history/geographical topic, these may well be the same as the above two classes, and can be referred to. But this will not always be the

1065:

the problem here is how to show it, and there is really no clear way except to try to write an article about it, or add it as a redirect to an article. The only alternative is to at least indicate something to make it clear that an article

1867:

meantime we have some omissions (if you see one - add it back). If the list is rebuilt on strict criteria, it then becomes easier to reject additions that don't meet the criteria, so we avoid returning to the original unmanageable list.

153: 1476:

Clarifying my position. I'm not proposing that we follow the applicable policies and guidelines just because they are there. They serve a purpose - to keep us from creating articles we cannot maintain that are unencyclopedic.

2279: 2917:

requesting these changes be made. The COI editor may wish to seek out additional feedback at the talk pages of the WikiProjects which govern this article; those projects are listed at the top of this talk page. Regards,

200: 2882:

Thanks for your input, DGG. I've reopened the request - having a standalone article might be a good idea in the longer term, but as it's not a requirement of being listed here this seems a good first step.

1317:

best known and unquestionably important of each kind. we'll still have spam problems, but it will be difficult for someone with a small database to argue that its as important as, say, Project Gutenberg.

934:

From my perspective, this article is a linkfarm, and all the external links should be removed. This is standard practice and I believe there's a great deal of consensus for it across Knowledge (XXG). --

821:

I disagree. These are not embedded citations in the sense that a claim is made that needs to be verified by an external source. These are simply links to external websites, and Knowledge (XXG) is

2019: 2242: 1301:

much have a WP articles, perhaps not including the exception that they be obviously qualified for one--for this subject such is not going to be all that obvious as for some lists of people.

993:, I think the only list entries allowed in the article should be those with their own article. At least until a different inclusion criteria is agreed upon and made clear in the article. -- 147: 1917:

is a part of the Australian Newspapers Digitisation Program. They launched a program to have internet users collaborate on digitising Historic Australian Newspapers, from 1803 to 1954.

44: 2913:

an article. Unfortunately, two editors giving feedback advising opposite actions would not be considered a consensus. Thus, the COI editor is kindly asked to establish that consensus

1656:

There is an alternative, and I shall pursue this if I cannot make the case here--to restrict this to the ones with existing articles, and do the more complete list in WP space, like

1891:

The fundamental problem, and the basic reason behind NOT DIRECTORY, is to avoid spam, which is a danger to the value and objectivity of anything thatcalls itself an encyclopedia.

1519:

Lists of reference sources are a good idea, of which a list of digital libraries would be a part. I'd prefer tables that include ways to search the libraries and other sources. --

1280:

I agree. I like the proposed rewrite. No editors have offered any rationale for making an exception to WP:LINKFARM and WP:LIST, let alone gained consensus for such exceptions. --

1563:

The lede section of this list is woefully inadequate. In particular, it does not list the inclusion criterion for listed items, which is required for all list articles under the

2156: 1862:

policy page is about including or excluding article topics, which is why I didn't cite it in my original comment. However, the key for managing a list such as this is to have

2034: 1836:

emphatically states: "Within Knowledge (XXG), notability determines whether a topic merits its own article." and Notability does "not directly limit the content of articles."

1599:, putting that link on the list, and thus linking to the main Harvard article without any explanation or sourcing, constitutes the adding of unreferenced content to the list. 623:

This list just looks like a data dump at the moment. I think we need to clean it up, break them into seperate categories and provide at least a short description for each. --

1644:

of the university articles--usually the article for the university library if there is no separate one for the project. If the material is not there, it should be added.

2646: 2642: 2628: 521:

Not sure how to proceed from here, because the wikipedia editing rules are a lot to take in at first, but how do people feel about starting categories with countries?

726:

Also, I think that we should NOT double-link. If the online library already has a W page, then please do not provide a URL: it only contributes to linkrot overhead.--

1636:

3. Each of the subnational ones at the state or major city level, if they are significant. (Most cities do not have one, most US states do--I do not know elsewhere)

3137: 316: 1651:

6. I would include the most important commercial or noncommercial publishers' projects--many of these are very general and far reaching and should be included.

3162: 1676:

Thanks for the ever thoughtful response, DGG. I think your alternative approach, limiting this list to projects with WP articles, is better; quoting from the

411: 322: 79: 483:

Hello everybody. I can see no mention for the Arabic Language nor the Arabic virtual libraries. Can you help me to update the page with this piece of info?

3152: 401: 2054: 1969:

is an open research hub, a place for organizing our amazing community of research and reference experts to collaborate and help improve the encyclopedia.

1311:

I see considerable problems though in deciding in which of the categories a particular project fits. There are not really clear divisions between them.

2079: 1993: 1574:, which is policy. These external links should be deleted. I suggest replacing them with the dmoz template in the external links section at the bottom. 1380:

Basically, by linking to the categories, you're just requiring that the reader take an extra step before they find the information they're looking for

1087:

general list & I want to think about just where--for example, we probably need a section for State Libraries to go along with the National ones.

2113: 518:. Categories could start with countries, perhaps (!) From a quick read below, it looks like this section has got off to a good start, and then ... 85: 3157: 1170: 377: 292: 1387:

The larger issue is that the article is very difficult to navigate, something which might be fixed by applying a different hierarchy of sections

3147: 3132: 2339:

The Bayerische StaatsBibliotek has another online library full of information; I used it to obtain copies of various volumes of the monumental

168: 1513: 135: 2815: 1198:

there was no discussion there, and there has been little here. There needs to be a bit more activity before you delete this much material.--

3167: 2594: 2249: 1986: 1913:

I was unsure whether this fell into this list or not - "digital library" seemingly being a technical term and opaque in meaning to me. The

1680:

guideine, "rather than using red links in lists, disambiguation pages or templates as an article creation guide, editors are encouraged to

30: 1405:

I second all of Buridan and Geraldk's remarks, especially the conclusion that what this list needs is a reorganization, not a gutting. --

1306:

In some cases, a comprehensive list may be appropriate: certainly with the major national digital library of those countries having one.

1758: 1354: 1225: 1147: 2049: 1567:

guideline. Unfortunately, I am not knowledgeable about the specific subject matter to write a good, useful, encyclopedic lede section.

486:

I know about AskZad.com, which is the first Arabic Virtual Library with more than 500 Million Pages archived on it. Thanks in advance.

1582: 1497: 1189: 970: 451: 368: 345: 275: 255: 99: 2624:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2328:

Persée (portal) -- this website has a sizable number of academic & technical publications published in France; fr.wikipedia has

443: 104: 20: 1528: 1341:

that they should included in Knowledge (XXG) at all. Without some evidence of notability, topics and lists of topics tend to fail

129: 3038: 2568: 2427: 2291:

think I know the answer, but when we have consensus about this we don't have to discuss this when it becomes neccesary.) Regards,

2093: 2059: 1501: 467: 24: 2118: 1213:

turned an organized categorical article back into the mess that it had been. Bravo to Stuartyeats for trying to fix this mess.

74: 3142: 799: 230: 2465: 2393: 1603:

In sum, can someone provide me with the reason I should not proceed with the cleanup that addresses these issues (other than

1509: 853: 811: 504: 125: 2151: 2064: 65: 2370: 2340: 1914: 2161: 2069: 2689: 175: 2044: 1595:

There are many, many mislinks within the article. For example, if someone thinks there is a digital library project at

1570:

The listing of external links, without any comment, within the text (as opposed to an external links section) violates

196: 2366: 2137: 2108: 2103: 2024: 795: 2756: 1940:

As it is becoming more notable and is a resource which serves a wider audience than just the University should the

1138:

There ought to be some form of inclusion criteria. Reliance on DGG's opinion for inclusion is a poor substitute. --

898:

writing articles. We do however need some better specification of just what the standards should be for inclusion.

2947:

Looking at this again after so long, I think the net benefit would be to add it , but still hope for an article.

2715: 2475: 1589: 1013: 447: 109: 2604: 2389: 1689: 1612: 1505: 1295:

I've had a frustrating time trying to help maintain the list, but I see a number of problems with this approach:

849: 807: 2645:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2039: 1888: 1657: 3067: 742: 236: 141: 2680: 2614: 2576: 1753: 1350: 1320:

lists of major projects of this sort. We're an obvious place to look, and we are qualified to maintain it.

1220: 1143: 770: 705:

unless it has been really important previously. . The link should be marked to show it is dead. See WP:EL.

2839:

who is more familiar with this list and its requirements than I am, to garner their input on this request.

2584: 2098: 1859: 1833: 1177: 966: 492: 3075: 3034: 2572: 1270: 1185: 974: 288: 2385: 2166: 1604: 867: 822: 55: 3049: 2664:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2652: 2595:

https://web.archive.org/web/20101006012318/http://www.aucegypt.edu/research/gerhart/MPDL/Pages/Home.aspx

2530: 2510:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2347:) I also used this site to obtain articles published in various German academic periodicals in the past. 2283: 1874: 1816: 1777: 1770:

easier to build back up properly, if you're willing to take that first step and get rid of the clutter.

1735: 376:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

291:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2575:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1571: 1257: 1237:

whole article needs to be deleted and turned into a category, but that's something to be discussed. --

70: 678: 2987: 2888: 2775: 1685: 1608: 1460:

article) was particularly helpful for providing a sense of balance and guidance for further inquiry.

927: 886: 837: 592: 461: 189: 3079: 2842: 2549: 2408: 2324:

I'm not sure how this page is supposed to work, but I'm surprised these two sites aren't included:

1035:

I've started cleaning up the list, removing all linkspam and entries without their own articles. --

496: 161: 2247:

Come and create your profile, and see how we can leverage your talent, expertise, and dedication:

2029: 3114: 3071: 2310: 2296: 1848: 1748: 1596: 1428: 1410: 1346: 1215: 1139: 727: 692: 567: 500: 2649:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2598: 2455: 1843:. They touch on many of the points you have mentioned, providing other perspectives. Thanks. -- 3118: 3095: 3082:. I think that the two pages just need to be linked more prominently. I'll add entries in the 3053: 3016: 2991: 2958: 2928: 2892: 2869: 2849: 2779: 2694: 2665: 2553: 2538: 2511: 2412: 2397: 2374: 2360: 2314: 2300: 2268: 1953: 1930: 1902: 1879: 1852: 1821: 1799: 1782: 1764: 1740: 1693: 1671: 1616: 1545: 1500:

would be a list of any digital library projects useful to Knowledge (XXG) editors. The other,

1486: 1471: 1451: 1432: 1414: 1400: 1372: 1357: 1331: 1289: 1274: 1246: 1231: 1207: 1150: 1133: 1116: 1102: 1081: 1060: 1044: 1029: 1002: 978: 943: 929: 909: 888: 857: 839: 815: 756: 730: 716: 695: 681: 508: 3091: 2437: 2356: 1396: 1368: 1266: 1242: 1203: 1181: 1056: 607: 529: 51: 2384:

I propose the addition to the list of BEIC, European Library of Information and Culture. See

2074: 1681: 1338: 1261: 1017: 990: 3045: 2526: 1926: 1870: 1812: 1773: 1731: 1534:

fortunately there are a great many of them. That doesn't mean the list should be smaller.

806:

policy. So unless there is a consensus not to do so, I would like to remove the template. --

584: 547: 537: 2672: 2518: 1677: 1578: 1564: 1342: 786: 3063: 2983: 2906: 2884: 2771: 2466:

https://web.archive.org/20141004022015/http://hul.harvard.edu:80/ois/digproj/projlist.html

2445: 1949: 916: 875: 826: 782: 457: 640: 588: 3008: 2979: 2920: 2631:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2545: 2404: 1524: 1482: 1285: 1112: 1040: 1025: 998: 939: 691:

If an online library site is down long-term, then we should not maintain a link here.--

557: 2671:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2638: 2517:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1977: 803: 360: 339: 3126: 3110: 2954: 2865: 2306: 2292: 2240:

1898: 1844: 1795: 1667: 1541: 1447: 1424: 1406: 1327: 1129: 1098: 1077: 905: 752: 712: 1337:

The problem is that none of the links, individually or as a group, are supported by

798:. When external links are used as they are in this article at the moment, they are " 602: 3087: 2469: 2352: 1464: 1392: 1364: 1238: 1199: 1052: 634: 2897:

Thank you both for your feedback, it's much appreciated. To sum up that feedback,

2132: 2265: 1922: 870:. A claim is something like "XYZ's digital library project is the largest..." - 576:

A German Gutenberg-type page (doesn't seem to be officially affliated with PG):

2476:

https://web.archive.org/20110927041553/http://uwdc.library.wisc.edu/index.shtml

2336:(Useful here because these periodicals also publish English-language articles.) 2146: 267: 249: 2637:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2605:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120108100043/http://www.ulib.org/ULIBAboutUs.htm

1945: 624: 658: 442:

to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include

3103: 1918: 1585:, where the addition of people without WP articles would be quickly deleted? 1520: 1478: 1281: 1108: 1036: 1021: 1009: 994: 935: 646: 373: 284: 2998: 2797: 2544:

2 out of 3, not bad, Botbrain. No worries, I have fixed the third by hand.

2479: 1921:

I do not know if this falls into the category or not. Useful in any case.

2949: 2898: 2860: 2834: 2816:"Darakht-e Danesh Online Library Revolutionizes Education in Afghanistan" 2615:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160204142700/https://uwdc.library.wisc.edu/

1893: 1790: 1662: 1536: 1442: 1322: 1124: 1093: 1072: 900: 747: 707: 280: 3086:

sections, without prejudice to the final merge (or no merge) decision.

2585:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150826070021/http://ebba.english.ucsb.edu/

2442:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

2005: 1461: 866:

claims - these are merely lists of external projects with links, ie, a

2608: 2505:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

1660:. I have asked some people involved with these topics for opinions. 612: 668: 522: 2770:

I propose adding this entry (but have a COI so won't do so myself).

2588: 2280:

Association des anciens amateurs de récits de guerre et d'holocauste

1630:

1. Each of the major comprehensive international nonprofit projects

776:

template was added to this article with an edit history comment of

2450:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

2343:, vital to anyone writing on Late Ancient/Early Medieval topics. ( 2329: 1588:

The headings within the article should not contain Wikilinks, per

1504:, would attempt a more encyclopedic, tighter admissions criteria? 515: 2901:

stated that it would be a good idea for an article to be created

2618: 2718:

by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

2176: 1633:

2. Each of the national ones, for as many nations as possible

577: 551: 2703: 2305:

Political think tanks aren't exactly digital library project.

1972: 427: 212: 184: 15: 2982:, with that, there appears to be consensus for the addition? 2599:

http://www.aucegypt.edu/research/gerhart/MPDL/Pages/Home.aspx

2456:

https://web.archive.org/20150410014850/http://www.ahds.ac.uk/

958: 2485:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

2351:

We ignore non-English online resources at our own peril. --

1941: 1008:

Would agree with that inclusion criterion. Adding empty Red

541: 1944:

have it's own article in order to be a part of this list?--

1581:

guideline. Fundamentally, how is this page different from

1169:

A complete rewrite of this page is being discussed over at

2579:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2365:

Hola bien dia Como estan Los saludar Gloria Roman Macias

667:

The Hearth - Home Economics Archive at Cornell University

561: 2186: 571: 440:

contributor may be personally or professionally connected

2909:

stated that it would be a good idea to create the entry

2333: 2431: 2426:

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on

2256: 1997: 1839:

Please do read some of the threads above, particularly

1714: 1420: 617: 2344: 587:

maintains a large list of digital library projects at

514:

Greetings all, I would like to support the comment by

160: 3062:, as these are distinct topics, in the same way that 2459: 963:... books from a bunch of publishers, as a service. 641:

http://wiki.netbib.de/coma/DeutscheDrucke#titelanker4

589:

http://www.lysator.liu.se/runeberg/admin/foreign.html

1423:, might be the direction to go, with some of it? -- 372:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 279:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2641:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 174: 321:This article has not yet received a rating on the 2470:http://hul.harvard.edu/ois/digproj/projlist.html 1498:Knowledge (XXG):List of digital library projects 823:not meant to be a directory of external websites 635:http://wiki.netbib.de/coma/DigitaleHandschriften 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1016:to wikipedia and is an unhelpful contribution. 745:, such as almost every major university now has 2627:This message was posted before February 2018. 1377:I'm not a big fan of the rewrite, here's why: 2147:Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers 1107:What inclusion criteria are you proposing? -- 8: 2198:We are working together towards 5 big goals: 2094:The Knowledge (XXG) Library Bookshelf (meta) 1577:The presence of redlinks is contrary to the 794:I think this is a misunderstanding of term 603:Library of Congress Digital Library project 546:Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes (in 3044:overlapping content, very similar subject 2723: 848:I think that the claims need citations. -- 334: 244: 218: 216: 2567:I have just modified 4 external links on 2228:, helping editors to find and use sources 787:Knowledge (XXG) isn't a directly of links 647:http://wiki.netbib.de/coma/InkunabelLinks 2762:Canadian Women for Women in Afghanistan 2480:http://uwdc.library.wisc.edu/index.shtml 2214:, databases, universities, and libraries 1496:Why not split this into two pages: One, 2789: 2403:Don't bother proposing it, just do it. 336: 246: 3138:Unknown-importance Computing articles 2221:of editors, libraries, and librarians 2152:Be a Knowledge (XXG) Visiting Scholar 1840: 386:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Libraries 301:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing 7: 3163:Articles with connected contributors 2798:"About the Darakht-e Danesh Library" 1554:Summary of the issues with this page 1171:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Computing 366:This article is within the scope of 273:This article is within the scope of 2609:http://www.ulib.org/ULIBAboutUs.htm 2205:local library and freely accessible 874:would need an external citation. -- 199:on November 9, 2007. The result of 23:for discussing improvements to the 3153:High-importance Libraries articles 1583:List of Sun Microsystems employees 1419:Perhaps a table format, something 669:http://hearth.library.cornell.edu/ 556:Project Laurens Janszn Coster (in 14: 2589:http://www.ebba.english.ucsb.edu/ 2571:. Please take a moment to review 2430:. Please take a moment to review 2219:relationships among our community 651:Shouldn't wikisource be on here? 566:Hungarian Electronic Library (in 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 3039:List of digital library projects 2997: 2707: 2569:List of digital library projects 2496: 2428:List of digital library projects 2212:access to paywalled publications 2185: 2175: 1976: 1502:List of digital library projects 1256:This page has been in breach of 528:Links to other project from the 431: 359: 338: 266: 248: 217: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 25:List of digital library projects 2747:Darakht-e Danesh Library (DDL) 2114:Knowledge (XXG) Loves Libraries 406:This article has been rated as 195:This article was nominated for 3158:WikiProject Libraries articles 2388:and the links there. Regards, 1909:Terminology gets me - the NLA? 1694:01:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 1672:02:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 1617:02:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 438:The following Knowledge (XXG) 389:Template:WikiProject Libraries 304:Template:WikiProject Computing 235:It is of interest to multiple 1: 3148:List-Class Libraries articles 3133:List-Class Computing articles 3096:11:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 2870:18:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC) 2850:08:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC) 2780:19:13, 12 November 2018 (UTC) 2619:http://uwdc.library.wisc.edu/ 2613:Replaced archive link x with 2361:17:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 2341:Monumenta Germaniae Historica 1954:11:49, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 1915:National Library of Australia 1546:04:07, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 1258:Knowledge (XXG):LINKFARM#LINK 979:03:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 930:11:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 910:08:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 889:00:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 858:23:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 840:15:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 816:10:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 785:(why so many external links? 757:03:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 659:The Online Library of Liberty 380:and see a list of open tasks. 295:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 3017:20:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC) 2992:01:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC) 2959:00:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 2929:22:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 2893:21:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 2695:23:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 2301:15:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 2065:Find Your Local Library tips 2006:Get free access to research! 802:" and are covered under the 578:http://projekt.gutenberg.de/ 552:http://cervantesvirtual.com/ 3168:Implemented requested edits 2539:02:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 2398:12:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC) 2269:14:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 2203:Connect editors with their 2013:Research tools and services 1987:The Knowledge (XXG) Library 1967:The Knowledge (XXG) Library 1961:The Knowledge (XXG) Library 1903:03:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 1880:21:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 1853:20:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 1822:05:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 1800:05:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 1783:05:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 1765:04:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 1741:04:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 1465: 762:External links or citations 731:01:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 717:17:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 696:01:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 664:It seems to be new. Oriel 633:large western mss libs see 3184: 3119:06:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC) 3054:21:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 2757:open educational resources 2658:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2564:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2448:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 2423:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2375:13:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC) 2367:Jose Alfredo roman recinos 2315:06:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC) 2235:in publishing and research 2133:Get free access to sources 2099:Universities and Libraries 1936:Cambridge Digital Library? 1706:I removed most of the list 1014:add any content or meaning 959:http://safari.oreilly.com/ 613:Cornell University Library 525:03:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 412:project's importance scale 323:project's importance scale 2554:04:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC) 2413:04:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC) 2386:Knowledge (XXG):GLAM/BEIC 2320:A couple of missing items 2282:(AAARGH) is a far-right, 1942:Cambridge Digital Library 1931:13:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 1134:18:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1117:15:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1103:02:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1082:00:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1061:15:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 1045:22:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 1030:16:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 1003:16:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 944:16:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 682:14:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 639:lots of unknown projects 595:18:17 Dec 11, 2002 (UTC) 542:http://www.liberliber.it/ 405: 354: 320: 261: 243: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3068:Institutional repository 2264:-Hope to see you there, 2258:Introduce yourself :-) 2226:research for Wikipedians 2210:Partner to provide free 2119:Wikidata source metadata 1529:02:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1514:21:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1487:20:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1472:00:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1452:06:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1433:20:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1415:03:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 1401:12:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 1373:11:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 1358:08:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 1332:20:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 1290:20:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 1275:20:20, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 1247:16:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 1232:13:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 1208:13:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC) 1151:08:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 743:Institutional repository 627:20:11, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC) 618:National Academies Press 509:12:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 2560:External links modified 2419:External links modified 2345:link to the MGH webpage 1682:write the article first 1012:to an article does not 985:List inclusion criteria 781:03:39, 9 November 2007 608:Bibliotheca Universalis 562:http://www.ljcoster.nl/ 3143:All Computing articles 3076:Open-access repository 2905:the entry here, while 2332:listing its holdings. 2055:Free newspaper sources 1717:, for easier tracking. 572:http://www.mek.iif.hu/ 289:information technology 225:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 2284:Holocaust revisionist 2157:Teach Library Interns 2070:Find Your Source tips 1715:Pre-removal page diff 536:Progetto Manuzio (in 452:neutral point of view 369:WikiProject Libraries 276:WikiProject Computing 229:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 3035:List of repositories 2639:regular verification 2493:to let others know. 2434:. If necessary, add 2390:Federico Leva (BEIC) 2162:Become a Coordinator 2080:Citation tools guide 2035:Free Resource Guides 2030:Discover open access 1262:Knowledge (XXG):List 1192:) 23:40, 19 May 2009 850:Philip Baird Shearer 808:Philip Baird Shearer 736:Individual libraries 444:conflict of interest 105:No original research 3080:Preprint repository 2629:After February 2018 2489:parameter below to 2182:Support Open Access 2075:How to find sources 1506:Shoemaker's Holiday 1265:wikipedia polices. 3072:subject repository 3066:is different from 3033:Proposed merge of 2700:Suggested addition 2683:InternetArchiveBot 2634:InternetArchiveBot 2460:http://ahds.ac.uk/ 2196: 1746:Nice cleanup job. 1597:Harvard University 1020:is worth a read.-- 800:embedded citations 392:Libraries articles 307:Computing articles 231:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2768: 2767: 2722: 2721: 2659: 2537: 2195: 2194: 2140:Books & Bytes 2020:Resource Exchange 2001: 1971: 1841:#Complete rewrite 1339:veriable evidence 1194: 1180:comment added by 981: 969:comment added by 530:Project Gutenberg 511: 495:comment added by 476: 475: 426: 425: 422: 421: 418: 417: 333: 332: 329: 328: 211: 210: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3175: 3015: 3013: 3002: 3001: 2927: 2925: 2847: 2845: 2838: 2824: 2823: 2820:Tech Afghanistan 2812: 2806: 2805: 2802:Darakht-e Danesh 2794: 2759:for Afghanistan 2724: 2711: 2710: 2704: 2693: 2684: 2657: 2656: 2635: 2533: 2532:Talk to my owner 2528: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2449: 2441: 2259: 2231:Promote broader 2189: 2179: 2008: 1991: 1990: 1980: 1973: 1878: 1820: 1781: 1761: 1756: 1751: 1739: 1590:WP:Accessibility 1469: 1363:stubification.-- 1228: 1223: 1218: 1193: 1174: 1165:Complete rewrite 964: 925: 919: 884: 878: 835: 829: 775: 769: 585:Project Runeberg 490: 435: 434: 428: 394: 393: 390: 387: 384: 363: 356: 355: 350: 342: 335: 309: 308: 305: 302: 299: 270: 263: 262: 252: 245: 228: 222: 221: 220: 213: 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3123: 3122: 3107: 3064:Digital library 3042: 3009: 3007: 2996: 2921: 2919: 2843: 2841: 2832: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2814: 2813: 2809: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2708: 2702: 2687: 2682: 2650: 2643:have permission 2633: 2577:this simple FaQ 2562: 2536: 2531: 2501: 2497: 2443: 2435: 2421: 2382: 2322: 2276: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2191: 2190: 2172: 2171: 2167:Learn about TWL 2123: 2084: 2060:Online archives 2045:Journal Sources 2004: 1984: 1964: 1938: 1919:link to website 1911: 1889:WP:Book sources 1868: 1810: 1771: 1759: 1754: 1749: 1729: 1708: 1686:UnitedStatesian 1658:WP:Book sources 1609:UnitedStatesian 1556: 1494: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1175: 1167: 987: 956: 923: 917: 882: 876: 833: 827: 783:user:ZimZalaBim 773: 767: 764: 738: 689: 593:Stephen Gilbert 481: 432: 408:High-importance 391: 388: 385: 382: 381: 349:High‑importance 348: 306: 303: 300: 297: 296: 226: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3181: 3179: 3171: 3170: 3165: 3160: 3155: 3150: 3145: 3140: 3135: 3125: 3124: 3106: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3041: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2826: 2825: 2807: 2788: 2787: 2783: 2766: 2765: 2763: 2760: 2753: 2751: 2748: 2744: 2743: 2740: 2737: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2720: 2719: 2712: 2701: 2698: 2677: 2676: 2669: 2622: 2621: 2611: 2603:Added archive 2601: 2593:Added archive 2591: 2583:Added archive 2561: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2529: 2523: 2522: 2515: 2483: 2482: 2474:Added archive 2472: 2464:Added archive 2462: 2454:Added archive 2420: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2381: 2378: 2349: 2348: 2337: 2321: 2318: 2275: 2272: 2255: 2254: 2246: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2229: 2222: 2215: 2208: 2199: 2193: 2192: 2174: 2173: 2170: 2169: 2164: 2159: 2154: 2149: 2144: 2135: 2129: 2122: 2121: 2116: 2111: 2106: 2101: 2096: 2090: 2083: 2082: 2077: 2072: 2067: 2062: 2057: 2052: 2050:Bibliographies 2047: 2042: 2037: 2032: 2027: 2025:Reference Desk 2022: 2016: 2010: 2002: 1983: 1981: 1963: 1959:Come and join 1957: 1937: 1934: 1910: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1837: 1832:Just to note, 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1649: 1645: 1637: 1634: 1631: 1601: 1600: 1593: 1586: 1575: 1568: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1493: 1490: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1417: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1360: 1318: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1088: 1084: 1033: 1032: 986: 983: 955: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 843: 842: 796:external links 792: 791: 771:external links 763: 760: 737: 734: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 688: 685: 662: 661: 621: 620: 615: 610: 605: 581: 580: 574: 564: 554: 544: 480: 477: 474: 473: 472: 471: 436: 424: 423: 420: 419: 416: 415: 404: 398: 397: 395: 378:the discussion 364: 352: 351: 343: 331: 330: 327: 326: 319: 313: 312: 310: 293:the discussion 271: 259: 258: 253: 241: 240: 234: 223: 209: 208: 201:the discussion 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3180: 3169: 3166: 3164: 3161: 3159: 3156: 3154: 3151: 3149: 3146: 3144: 3141: 3139: 3136: 3134: 3131: 3130: 3128: 3121: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3018: 3014: 3012: 3005: 3000: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2951: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2930: 2926: 2924: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2862: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2848: 2846: 2836: 2821: 2817: 2811: 2808: 2803: 2799: 2793: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2764: 2761: 2758: 2754: 2752: 2749: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2738: 2735: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2725: 2717: 2713: 2706: 2705: 2699: 2697: 2696: 2691: 2686: 2685: 2674: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2654: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2630: 2625: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2565: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2534: 2527: 2520: 2516: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2494: 2492: 2488: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2439: 2433: 2429: 2424: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2379: 2377: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2363: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2319: 2317: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2288: 2285: 2281: 2273: 2271: 2270: 2267: 2260: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2245: 2244: 2234: 2230: 2227: 2223: 2220: 2216: 2213: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2188: 2183: 2178: 2168: 2165: 2163: 2160: 2158: 2155: 2153: 2150: 2148: 2145: 2143: 2141: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2130: 2128: 2127: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2107: 2105: 2102: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2089: 2088: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2068: 2066: 2063: 2061: 2058: 2056: 2053: 2051: 2048: 2046: 2043: 2041: 2038: 2036: 2033: 2031: 2028: 2026: 2023: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2015: 2014: 2009: 2007: 1999: 1995: 1989: 1988: 1982: 1979: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1968: 1962: 1958: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1935: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1895: 1890: 1885: 1881: 1876: 1872: 1865: 1861: 1860:WP:Notability 1856: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1834:WP:Notability 1831: 1823: 1818: 1814: 1808: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1779: 1775: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1737: 1733: 1725: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1664: 1659: 1655: 1650: 1646: 1643: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1587: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1553: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1491: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1463: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1386: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1347:Gavin Collins 1344: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1315: 1310: 1305: 1299: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1259: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1224: 1219: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1172: 1164: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1140:Gavin Collins 1137: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1089: 1085: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 984: 982: 980: 976: 972: 968: 961: 960: 953: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 928: 926: 922: 913: 912: 911: 907: 903: 902: 896: 890: 887: 885: 881: 873: 869: 865: 861: 860: 859: 855: 851: 847: 846: 845: 844: 841: 838: 836: 832: 824: 820: 819: 818: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 790: 788: 784: 779: 778: 777: 772: 761: 759: 758: 754: 750: 749: 744: 735: 733: 732: 729: 728:SallyForth123 718: 714: 710: 709: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 694: 693:SallyForth123 686: 684: 683: 680: 674: 671: 670: 665: 660: 657: 656: 655: 652: 649: 648: 643: 642: 637: 636: 631: 628: 626: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 604: 601: 600: 599: 596: 594: 590: 586: 579: 575: 573: 569: 565: 563: 559: 555: 553: 549: 545: 543: 539: 535: 534: 533: 531: 526: 524: 519: 517: 512: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 489:___________ 487: 484: 478: 469: 466: 463: 459: 456: 455: 453: 449: 448:autobiography 445: 441: 437: 430: 429: 413: 409: 403: 400: 399: 396: 379: 375: 371: 370: 365: 362: 358: 357: 353: 347: 344: 341: 337: 324: 318: 315: 314: 311: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 277: 272: 269: 265: 264: 260: 257: 254: 251: 247: 242: 238: 232: 224: 215: 214: 206: 202: 198: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3108: 3083: 3059: 3043: 3010: 3003: 2948: 2922: 2914: 2910: 2902: 2859: 2840: 2830: 2819: 2810: 2801: 2792: 2784: 2769: 2739:Provider(s) 2736:Description 2716:edit request 2681: 2678: 2653:source check 2632: 2626: 2623: 2566: 2563: 2524: 2504: 2495: 2490: 2486: 2484: 2425: 2422: 2383: 2364: 2350: 2330:this article 2323: 2304: 2289: 2277: 2263: 2248: 2241: 2239: 2232: 2225: 2218: 2211: 2204: 2197: 2181: 2139: 2126:Get involved 2125: 2124: 2086: 2085: 2040:Book Sources 2012: 2011: 2003: 1985: 1966: 1965: 1960: 1939: 1912: 1892: 1863: 1806: 1789: 1747: 1726: 1722: 1661: 1641: 1605:WP:ITSUSEFUL 1602: 1557: 1535: 1495: 1475: 1466: 1458: 1441: 1321: 1313: 1308: 1303: 1297: 1294: 1267:Stuartyeates 1255: 1214: 1182:Stuartyeates 1168: 1123: 1092: 1071: 1070:be written. 1067: 1034: 988: 971:68.55.25.184 962: 957: 920: 899: 879: 871: 863: 830: 804:verification 793: 780: 765: 746: 739: 725: 706: 690: 675: 672: 666: 663: 653: 650: 644: 638: 632: 629: 622: 598:More links: 597: 582: 527: 520: 513: 488: 485: 482: 464: 439: 407: 367: 274: 237:WikiProjects 204: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3046:fgnievinski 2755:Library of 2730:Subject(s) 2233:open access 2224:Facilitate 1871:Gavia immer 1813:Gavia immer 1809:that bold. 1774:Gavia immer 1732:Gavia immer 1572:WP:LINKFARM 1176:—Preceding 965:—Preceding 679:82.11.32.93 654:We can add 645:incunabula 491:—Preceding 148:free images 31:not a forum 3127:Categories 2984:Nikkimaria 2907:Nikkimaria 2903:along with 2885:Nikkimaria 2844:Spintendo 2785:References 2772:Nikkimaria 2690:Report bug 2142:newsletter 2109:Publishers 2104:Archivists 1492:Suggestion 1343:WP:NOT#DIR 915:linkfarm.- 479:Categories 458:Nikkimaria 227:List-class 3104:Z-Library 3011:Spintendo 3006:Regards, 2980:Spintendo 2923:Spintendo 2673:this tool 2666:this tool 2546:GangofOne 2525:Cheers. — 2519:this tool 2512:this tool 2405:GangofOne 2207:resources 2138:Read the 1421:like this 1355:contribs) 1148:contribs) 868:directory 568:Hungarian 532:article: 383:Libraries 374:Libraries 346:Libraries 298:Computing 285:computing 281:computers 256:Computing 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3111:Greatder 3084:see also 2831:Pinging 2750:General 2733:Volumes 2679:Cheers.— 2438:cbignore 2307:Greatder 2293:Jeff5102 2087:Outreach 1845:Quiddity 1425:Quiddity 1407:Quiddity 1190:contribs 1178:unsigned 967:unsigned 505:contribs 497:Minshawy 493:unsigned 468:contribs 197:deletion 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3088:Klbrain 2911:without 2573:my edit 2535::Online 2487:checked 2432:my edit 2353:llywrch 2250:Join in 2243:Sign up 1393:Geraldk 1384:sources 1365:Buridan 1239:Buridan 1200:Buridan 1053:Shyamal 1018:WP:WTAF 991:WP:LIST 548:Spanish 538:Italian 410:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3060:Oppose 2915:before 2446:nobots 2274:AAARGH 2266:Ocaasi 2217:Build 1923:SauliH 1713:Note: 1678:WP:RED 1579:WP:SAL 1565:WP:SAL 954:Safari 864:aren't 862:These 583:Also, 523:avaiki 450:, and 287:, and 233:scale. 126:Google 3037:into 2955:talk 2866:talk 2727:Name 2714:This 1946:Acc60 1899:talk 1807:quite 1796:talk 1760:Space 1668:talk 1648:case. 1542:talk 1227:Space 1068:could 1010:links 687:Links 625:Imran 558:Dutch 516:Imran 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3115:talk 3102:Add 3092:talk 3078:and 3050:talk 3004:Done 2988:talk 2889:talk 2776:talk 2742:Ref 2550:talk 2491:true 2409:talk 2394:talk 2380:BEIC 2371:talk 2357:talk 2334:link 2311:talk 2297:talk 2278:The 2184:... 1998:edit 1994:talk 1950:talk 1927:talk 1875:talk 1864:some 1858:the 1849:talk 1817:talk 1778:talk 1755:From 1750:Them 1736:talk 1690:talk 1642:part 1613:talk 1607:)? 1525:talk 1521:Ronz 1510:talk 1483:talk 1479:Ronz 1448:talk 1429:talk 1411:talk 1397:talk 1369:talk 1351:talk 1328:talk 1286:talk 1282:Ronz 1271:talk 1260:and 1243:talk 1222:From 1217:Them 1204:talk 1186:talk 1144:talk 1130:talk 1113:talk 1109:Ronz 1099:talk 1078:talk 1057:talk 1041:talk 1037:Ronz 1026:talk 1022:Hu12 999:talk 995:Ronz 989:Per 975:talk 940:talk 936:Ronz 921:Zala 906:talk 880:Zala 872:that 854:talk 831:Zala 825:. -- 812:talk 766:The 753:talk 713:talk 501:talk 462:talk 402:High 205:Keep 203:was 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2950:DGG 2899:DGG 2861:DGG 2835:DGG 2647:RfC 2617:on 2607:to 2597:to 2587:to 2478:to 2468:to 2458:to 2180:... 1894:DGG 1791:DGG 1663:DGG 1537:DGG 1462:+sj 1443:DGG 1323:DGG 1125:DGG 1094:DGG 1073:DGG 924:Bim 918:Zim 901:DGG 883:Bim 877:Zim 834:Bim 828:Zim 748:DGG 708:DGG 673:-- 630:-- 591:-- 570:): 560:): 550:): 540:): 454:. 317:??? 176:TWL 3129:: 3117:) 3109:^ 3094:) 3074:, 3070:, 3052:) 2990:) 2957:) 2891:) 2868:) 2818:. 2800:. 2778:) 2660:. 2655:}} 2651:{{ 2552:) 2444:{{ 2440:}} 2436:{{ 2411:) 2396:) 2373:) 2359:) 2313:) 2299:) 1996:| 1952:) 1929:) 1901:) 1869:— 1851:) 1811:— 1798:) 1772:— 1730:— 1692:) 1670:) 1615:) 1544:) 1527:) 1512:) 1485:) 1477:-- 1450:) 1431:) 1413:) 1399:) 1371:) 1330:) 1314:D. 1309:C. 1304:B. 1298:A. 1288:) 1273:) 1245:) 1206:) 1188:• 1132:) 1115:) 1101:) 1080:) 1059:) 1043:) 1028:) 1001:) 977:) 942:) 908:) 856:) 814:) 774:}} 768:{{ 755:) 715:) 507:) 503:• 446:, 283:, 156:) 54:; 3113:( 3090:( 3048:( 2986:( 2953:( 2887:( 2864:( 2837:: 2833:@ 2822:. 2804:. 2774:( 2692:) 2688:( 2675:. 2668:. 2548:( 2521:. 2514:. 2502:Y 2407:( 2392:( 2369:( 2355:( 2309:( 2295:( 2000:) 1992:( 1948:( 1925:( 1897:( 1877:) 1873:( 1847:( 1819:) 1815:( 1794:( 1780:) 1776:( 1738:) 1734:( 1688:( 1666:( 1611:( 1592:. 1540:( 1523:( 1508:( 1481:( 1467:+ 1446:( 1427:( 1409:( 1395:( 1367:( 1353:| 1349:( 1326:( 1284:( 1269:( 1241:( 1202:( 1184:( 1173:. 1146:| 1142:( 1128:( 1111:( 1097:( 1076:( 1055:( 1039:( 1024:( 997:( 973:( 938:( 904:( 852:( 810:( 789:) 751:( 711:( 499:( 470:) 465:· 460:( 414:. 325:. 239:. 207:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index