Knowledge

Talk:Monday Night War

Source 📝

403:. A merger would miss the overarching picture in favor of a too-narrow focus on the WWF. Now, there is notable overlap, of course, as the pivot by the WWF to edgier programming that became the Attitude Era was in large part a reaction to the Monday Night Wars in general, the "cool heel" popularity of the nWo in particular, (and the rise of ECW in part as well), but it would be better to improve this article by drawing on the sources in the Attitude Era article instead of eliminating one of them. Because if one were eliminated, it would be the Attitude Era, as the Monday Night Wars 214: 245: 297: 276: 383:
ended in early 2001 with the buyout, AE ended in mid 2002 with the name change. At least, these are the currently recognized milestones in the articles. It's worth considering to just merge the articles and create a single high-quality article covering this period in mainstream American pro wrestling history.
457:
Considering there was only one reply period, I get the impression that this MNW article does not get much attention at all compared to the AE article, which was partly my initial reasoning for the merger proposal. But I see it is not in the cards any time soon, and will let it go for the time being,
382:
This Monday Night Wars article is frankly really bad. Almost no citations. The Attitude Era article is in much better shape as of this moment. The MNW and AE largely overlap. MNW started in late 95 with the first Nitro, AE started in late 97 with the screwjob, but had a long buildup before that. MNW
538:
I used an edit summary to explain, which is enough. The infobox is incorrectly used. It's not for a period of history, but for individual events, like a PPV. Its misuse at the Attitude Era article (where it should also be removed) does not warrant compounding the error by adding one here.
592:
I've looked over the article now several times and I don't see any sources cited that directly discuss the reasons for WCW's demise, nor sources that directly pin the end of the company on it's salary size. If I've missed them, can you point me towards them? I'm working on the
507:
I have done the best I can to take the pro wrestling event infobox used in the AE article, and make it relevant to this article. It is not an exact fit, but I believe it improves the article overall. Feel free to improve the infobox, as opposed to a knee-jerk revert/removal.
603:
I know well that on the WWF side, the argument was often made by people such as Jim Ross that WCW's contracts were too big, but typically that was denied by people such as Eric Bischoff. Because it's a contested claim, stating it as fact arguably runs into an
523:
I see the infobox has ALREADY been reverted, with zero explanation on the Talk page. In the future, if you opt not to improve the article, but merely delete improvements, kindly give some explanation on the Talk page.
164: 398:
Oppose as proposed, only because the AE is WWF specific, and the Monday Night Wars was an outgrowth of a rivalry between two separate companies that long predated the actual MNW period, going all the way back to
443:
With zero supporting comments in a month, the chances of a merger gaining consensus are very unlikely. No need to leave a large tag on a pair of articles when there's little chance of such an outcome.
484:
I propose adding an infobox to this MNW article in an attempt to salvage it, seeing as the merger proposal went nowhere. It currently is just a more vague/poorly-sourced/worse version of the
640: 348: 358: 316: 645: 458:
although it still seems obvious that some sort of merger is the best long-term solution, given the sorry state of this article, even if not in the exact form I suggested.
205: 158: 324: 635: 488:
article, just with a bit more emphasis on WCW. An infobox in lede would make it look a lot more professional and perhaps lead to a renovation of the whole article.
320: 307: 281: 90: 429:. Not sure why it was removed just short of a month later with no explanation, but next time some note of the reasoning on the Talk page would be nice. 55: 400: 96: 525: 509: 489: 459: 430: 384: 562: 201: 179: 110: 41: 146: 115: 31: 621: 85: 594: 256: 76: 561:
Reference 7 is in trouble, but I don't have time to fix it. I think it needs a link to the Wayback Machine, such as
407:
the common name of the period in major American pro wrestling as a whole, not just one company's programming policy.
605: 213: 196: 140: 224: 136: 529: 513: 493: 463: 434: 388: 120: 312: 262: 186: 617: 571: 244: 609: 600:
I'm not denying that it's a viewpoint that exists, I'm just not seeing the sources at the moment.
563:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071215121502/http://www.wrestlingclothesline.com/HallOfFameDennis.htm
544: 448: 412: 172: 66: 229: 81: 612:. The trick would be to cover one both viewpoints rather than stating one or the other as fact. 315:. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the 152: 62: 226: 35: 613: 567: 597:
article at the moment and it seems those kind of sources are missing from there also.
587: 540: 444: 408: 17: 629: 485: 426: 425:
I see that the merger proposal template has been removed on both this article and
581:
Sourcing on the claim that WCW's demise was tied to the size of it's contracts
228: 575: 548: 533: 517: 497: 467: 452: 438: 416: 392: 296: 275: 238: 230: 26: 580: 311:, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to 171: 323:, where you can join the project and contribute to 44:for general discussion of the article's subject. 641:High-importance Professional wrestling articles 185: 8: 333:Knowledge:WikiProject Professional wrestling 646:WikiProject Professional wrestling articles 336:Template:WikiProject Professional wrestling 270: 636:C-Class Professional wrestling articles 272: 242: 7: 261:It is of interest to the following 34:for discussing improvements to the 308:WikiProject Professional wrestling 25: 295: 274: 243: 212: 56:Click here to start a new topic. 353:This article has been rated as 339:Professional wrestling articles 1: 549:10:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC) 534:07:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC) 518:09:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC) 498:08:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC) 468:08:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC) 453:04:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC) 439:03:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC) 53:Put new text under old text. 622:21:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 595:World Championship Wrestling 576:00:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 417:08:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC) 393:07:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC) 61:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 662: 606:Template:According to whom 359:project's importance scale 352: 290: 269: 91:Be welcoming to newcomers 305:is within the scope of 330:Professional wrestling 313:professional wrestling 282:Professional wrestling 251:This article is rated 86:avoid personal attacks 18:Talk:Monday Night Wars 206:Auto-archiving period 111:Neutral point of view 116:No original research 610:Template:Unbalanced 557:Reference 7 linkrot 317:project to-do page 257:content assessment 97:dispute resolution 58: 608:issue as well as 373: 372: 369: 368: 365: 364: 237: 236: 77:Assume good faith 54: 16:(Redirected from 653: 591: 480:Infobox Proposal 341: 340: 337: 334: 331: 303:Monday Night War 299: 292: 291: 286: 278: 271: 254: 248: 247: 239: 231: 217: 216: 207: 190: 189: 175: 106:Article policies 36:Monday Night War 27: 21: 661: 660: 656: 655: 654: 652: 651: 650: 626: 625: 585: 583: 559: 505: 482: 380: 378:Merger Proposal 355:High-importance 338: 335: 332: 329: 328: 319:, or visit the 285:High‑importance 284: 255:on Knowledge's 252: 233: 232: 227: 204: 132: 127: 126: 125: 102: 72: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 659: 657: 649: 648: 643: 638: 628: 627: 582: 579: 558: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 504: 501: 481: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 420: 419: 401:Black Saturday 379: 376: 371: 370: 367: 366: 363: 362: 351: 345: 344: 342: 300: 288: 287: 279: 267: 266: 260: 249: 235: 234: 225: 223: 222: 219: 218: 192: 191: 129: 128: 124: 123: 118: 113: 104: 103: 101: 100: 93: 88: 79: 73: 71: 70: 59: 50: 49: 46: 45: 39: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 658: 647: 644: 642: 639: 637: 634: 633: 631: 624: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 601: 598: 596: 589: 578: 577: 573: 569: 565: 564: 556: 550: 546: 542: 537: 536: 535: 531: 527: 526:130.45.24.168 522: 521: 520: 519: 515: 511: 510:130.45.24.168 503:Infobox Added 502: 500: 499: 495: 491: 490:130.45.24.168 487: 479: 469: 465: 461: 460:130.45.24.168 456: 455: 454: 450: 446: 442: 441: 440: 436: 432: 431:130.45.24.168 428: 424: 423: 422: 421: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 397: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 385:130.45.24.168 377: 375: 360: 356: 350: 347: 346: 343: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 309: 304: 301: 298: 294: 293: 289: 283: 280: 277: 273: 268: 264: 258: 250: 246: 241: 240: 221: 220: 215: 211: 203: 200: 198: 194: 193: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 131: 130: 122: 121:Verifiability 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 108: 107: 98: 94: 92: 89: 87: 83: 80: 78: 75: 74: 68: 64: 63:Learn to edit 60: 57: 52: 51: 48: 47: 43: 37: 33: 29: 28: 19: 602: 599: 584: 566: 560: 506: 486:Attitude Era 483: 427:Attitude Era 404: 381: 374: 354: 321:project page 306: 302: 263:WikiProjects 209: 195: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 105: 30:This is the 325:discussions 159:free images 42:not a forum 630:Categories 614:CeltBrowne 568:Beamjockey 588:Oknazevad 541:oknazevad 445:oknazevad 409:oknazevad 99:if needed 82:Be polite 32:talk page 210:180 days 197:Archives 67:get help 40:This is 38:article. 357:on the 253:C-class 165:WP refs 153:scholar 259:scale. 137:Google 180:JSTOR 141:books 95:Seek 618:talk 572:talk 545:talk 530:talk 514:talk 494:talk 464:talk 449:talk 435:talk 413:talk 389:talk 349:High 173:FENS 147:news 84:and 187:TWL 632:: 620:) 574:) 547:) 532:) 516:) 496:) 466:) 451:) 437:) 415:) 405:is 391:) 208:: 167:) 65:; 616:( 590:: 586:@ 570:( 543:( 528:( 512:( 492:( 462:( 447:( 433:( 411:( 387:( 361:. 327:. 265:: 202:1 199:: 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 69:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Monday Night Wars
talk page
Monday Night War
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1


content assessment
WikiProjects

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.