49:
264:"It was not until the 1970s that Karl Koopman and Guy Musser recognized that the animal—whose skin had landed at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, while the skull was at the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle in Paris—recognized that the animal" Repetition of the phrase "recognized that the animal"- is that deliberate?
423:
I (of course) included all I could find. There are a few more books that I don't have right now that may have more information, but at the end of the day this is another poorly known species.
54:
420:
More on its diet/habits generally would be needed, I think. I note you've added a line about diet now, it occurred to me last night after I'd gone that you didn't mention anything.
336:
Why does the second paragraph of "distribution and ecology" refer to the species, where as most of the article refers to the genus? (I note the conservation section also does this)
347:
Of the genus, to be precise. The species probably has no true common name, though I'm sure someone produced "Taiva Shrew Tenrec" or something like that. I've clarified a little.
389:
Yes, I'll make one myself or ask
Visionholder. I think the IUCN map is missing the northernmost distribution segment, at Tsaratanana, where it was only recorded in 2008.
87:
378:
Ok, looking back through, everything looks ready for GA status (apart from the quick replies above). Some things to think about if you're thinking about FAC-
352:
Your citation style still looks a little odd to me, but that's fine. I'll do a few more checks of various things tomorrow, but it's generally looking great.
77:
59:
133:
129:
114:
409:
194:'s tail—a piece of fluffiness at the tip. Goodman and Carleton (1996) appeared to be making a distinction between the "tuft" in
82:
171:
106:
17:
400:
A picture of the species would obviously be good, but I couldn't find a single one online, let alone a free one.
412:
book with a bit of
Googling- seems an obscure subject, but maybe it's one you'd be able to get hold of somehow?
428:
The article title is the genus, but it opens with the species name. This just seems a little odd to me.
383:
466:
452:
357:
321:
307:
238:
224:
157:
191:
296:
177:
Both are fairly useless in my opinion, but yes, they do apply. Also added the
Madagascar cat.
122:
436:
390:
367:
248:
211:
166:
Ok, I doubt I'll get through a whole review before heading to bed, but I'll have a look.
470:
456:
439:
393:
370:
361:
325:
311:
251:
242:
228:
214:
161:
462:
448:
432:
353:
317:
303:
234:
220:
153:
202:
23:
99:
403:
There are some—try
Goodman and Carleton (1996). But of course, those are not free.
431:
That's what I usually do for monotypic living genera—though I notice Sasata
461:
After a final peep, I'm now happy to promote this to GA status. Well done!
344:"shrew-tenrecs" Is this the common name of the species? I don't follow.
339:
They are the same; any variation is merely for the purpose of variation.
170:
I added a couple of categories; I assume there's no issue? There's also
196:
272:
Could the common names perhaps get a mention in the lead?
141:
110:
447:
As I say, these thoughts are for pushing towards FA.
415:That's a compilation of German Knowledge articles.
180:I can understand that, but I do like categories :)
187:"The long tail lacks a pencil" What's a pencil?
302:I'd have no objection if process was linked.
292:"many indentations and processes" Processes?
247:Thought I had removed it there... I'm sorry.
8:
206:, but other sources also speak of a tuft in
37:
68:
40:
210:, so I'll just eliminate the pencil.
7:
295:Are "protuberances" any better? Cf.
280:"There are no crests and ridges on"
316:And yeah, protuberances is better.
219:You also use the term in the lead.
31:
382:A range map would be nice. See
233:I've removed it from the lead.
172:Category:Mammals of Madagascar
1:
18:Talk:Malagasy mountain mouse
471:13:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
457:12:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
440:13:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
394:13:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
371:08:55, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
362:02:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
326:13:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
312:12:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
252:13:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
243:13:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
229:12:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
215:08:55, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
162:02:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
486:
435:. I might change it here.
366:Thanks for the review!
24:Talk:Monticolomys/GA1
433:does it differently
284:ridges, perhaps?
96:
95:
22:(Redirected from
477:
200:and "pencil" in
146:
137:
118:
50:Copyvio detector
38:
27:
485:
484:
480:
479:
478:
476:
475:
474:
127:
104:
98:
92:
64:
36:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
483:
481:
445:
444:
443:
442:
426:
425:
424:
418:
417:
416:
408:I came across
406:
405:
404:
398:
397:
396:
376:
375:
374:
373:
350:
349:
348:
342:
341:
340:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
290:
289:
288:
278:
277:
276:
270:
269:
268:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
147:
94:
93:
91:
90:
85:
80:
74:
71:
70:
66:
65:
63:
62:
60:External links
57:
52:
46:
43:
42:
35:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
482:
473:
472:
468:
464:
459:
458:
454:
450:
441:
438:
434:
430:
429:
427:
422:
421:
419:
414:
413:
411:
407:
402:
401:
399:
395:
392:
388:
387:
385:
381:
380:
379:
372:
369:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
346:
345:
343:
338:
337:
335:
327:
323:
319:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
301:
300:
298:
294:
293:
291:
286:
285:
283:
279:
274:
273:
271:
266:
265:
263:
253:
250:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
216:
213:
209:
208:Macrotarsomys
205:
204:
203:Macrotarsomys
199:
198:
193:
190:The thing on
189:
188:
186:
179:
178:
176:
175:
173:
169:
168:
167:
164:
163:
159:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
103:
102:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
75:
73:
72:
67:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
47:
45:
44:
39:
33:
25:
19:
460:
446:
377:
281:
207:
201:
195:
165:
150:
149:
142:
138:
124:Article talk
123:
119:
100:
97:
88:Instructions
111:visual edit
55:Authorship
41:GA toolbox
463:J Milburn
449:J Milburn
354:J Milburn
318:J Milburn
304:J Milburn
267:Oops, no.
235:J Milburn
221:J Milburn
154:J Milburn
151:Reviewer:
78:Templates
69:Reviewing
34:GA Review
192:this guy
83:Criteria
297:process
197:Eliurus
134:history
115:history
101:Article
437:Ucucha
391:Ucucha
368:Ucucha
249:Ucucha
212:Ucucha
275:Sure.
143:Watch
16:<
467:talk
453:talk
410:this
384:here
358:talk
322:talk
308:talk
287:Yes.
239:talk
225:talk
158:talk
130:edit
107:edit
469:)
455:)
386:.
360:)
324:)
310:)
299:.
282:or
241:)
227:)
174:.
160:)
132:|
113:|
109:|
465:(
451:(
356:(
320:(
306:(
237:(
223:(
156:(
139:·
136:)
128:(
120:·
117:)
105:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.