42:
257:"It was not until the 1970s that Karl Koopman and Guy Musser recognized that the animal—whose skin had landed at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, while the skull was at the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle in Paris—recognized that the animal" Repetition of the phrase "recognized that the animal"- is that deliberate?
416:
I (of course) included all I could find. There are a few more books that I don't have right now that may have more information, but at the end of the day this is another poorly known species.
47:
413:
More on its diet/habits generally would be needed, I think. I note you've added a line about diet now, it occurred to me last night after I'd gone that you didn't mention anything.
329:
Why does the second paragraph of "distribution and ecology" refer to the species, where as most of the article refers to the genus? (I note the conservation section also does this)
340:
Of the genus, to be precise. The species probably has no true common name, though I'm sure someone produced "Taiva Shrew Tenrec" or something like that. I've clarified a little.
382:
Yes, I'll make one myself or ask
Visionholder. I think the IUCN map is missing the northernmost distribution segment, at Tsaratanana, where it was only recorded in 2008.
80:
371:
Ok, looking back through, everything looks ready for GA status (apart from the quick replies above). Some things to think about if you're thinking about FAC-
345:
Your citation style still looks a little odd to me, but that's fine. I'll do a few more checks of various things tomorrow, but it's generally looking great.
70:
52:
126:
122:
107:
402:
187:'s tail—a piece of fluffiness at the tip. Goodman and Carleton (1996) appeared to be making a distinction between the "tuft" in
75:
164:
99:
17:
393:
A picture of the species would obviously be good, but I couldn't find a single one online, let alone a free one.
405:
book with a bit of
Googling- seems an obscure subject, but maybe it's one you'd be able to get hold of somehow?
421:
The article title is the genus, but it opens with the species name. This just seems a little odd to me.
376:
459:
445:
350:
314:
300:
231:
217:
150:
184:
289:
170:
Both are fairly useless in my opinion, but yes, they do apply. Also added the
Madagascar cat.
115:
429:
383:
360:
241:
204:
159:
Ok, I doubt I'll get through a whole review before heading to bed, but I'll have a look.
463:
449:
432:
386:
363:
354:
318:
304:
244:
235:
221:
207:
154:
455:
441:
425:
346:
310:
296:
227:
213:
146:
195:
92:
396:
There are some—try
Goodman and Carleton (1996). But of course, those are not free.
424:
That's what I usually do for monotypic living genera—though I notice Sasata
454:
After a final peep, I'm now happy to promote this to GA status. Well done!
337:"shrew-tenrecs" Is this the common name of the species? I don't follow.
332:
They are the same; any variation is merely for the purpose of variation.
163:
I added a couple of categories; I assume there's no issue? There's also
189:
265:
Could the common names perhaps get a mention in the lead?
134:
103:
440:
As I say, these thoughts are for pushing towards FA.
408:That's a compilation of German Knowledge articles.
173:I can understand that, but I do like categories :)
180:"The long tail lacks a pencil" What's a pencil?
295:I'd have no objection if process was linked.
285:"many indentations and processes" Processes?
240:Thought I had removed it there... I'm sorry.
8:
199:, but other sources also speak of a tuft in
30:
61:
33:
203:, so I'll just eliminate the pencil.
7:
288:Are "protuberances" any better? Cf.
273:"There are no crests and ridges on"
309:And yeah, protuberances is better.
212:You also use the term in the lead.
24:
375:A range map would be nice. See
226:I've removed it from the lead.
165:Category:Mammals of Madagascar
1:
18:Talk:Malagasy mountain mouse
464:13:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
450:12:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
433:13:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
387:13:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
364:08:55, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
355:02:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
319:13:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
305:12:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
245:13:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
236:13:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
222:12:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
208:08:55, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
155:02:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
479:
428:. I might change it here.
359:Thanks for the review!
426:does it differently
277:ridges, perhaps?
89:
88:
470:
193:and "pencil" in
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
474:
438:
437:
436:
435:
419:
418:
417:
411:
410:
409:
401:I came across
399:
398:
397:
391:
390:
389:
369:
368:
367:
366:
343:
342:
341:
335:
334:
333:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
283:
282:
281:
271:
270:
269:
263:
262:
261:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
466:
465:
461:
457:
452:
451:
447:
443:
434:
431:
427:
423:
422:
420:
415:
414:
412:
407:
406:
404:
400:
395:
394:
392:
388:
385:
381:
380:
378:
374:
373:
372:
365:
362:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
339:
338:
336:
331:
330:
328:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
291:
287:
286:
284:
279:
278:
276:
272:
267:
266:
264:
259:
258:
256:
246:
243:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
206:
202:
201:Macrotarsomys
198:
197:
196:Macrotarsomys
192:
191:
186:
183:The thing on
182:
181:
179:
172:
171:
169:
168:
166:
162:
161:
160:
157:
156:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
453:
439:
370:
274:
200:
194:
188:
158:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
456:J Milburn
442:J Milburn
347:J Milburn
311:J Milburn
297:J Milburn
260:Oops, no.
228:J Milburn
214:J Milburn
147:J Milburn
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
185:this guy
76:Criteria
290:process
190:Eliurus
127:history
108:history
94:Article
430:Ucucha
384:Ucucha
361:Ucucha
242:Ucucha
205:Ucucha
268:Sure.
136:Watch
16:<
460:talk
446:talk
403:this
377:here
351:talk
315:talk
301:talk
280:Yes.
232:talk
218:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
462:)
448:)
379:.
353:)
317:)
303:)
292:.
275:or
234:)
220:)
167:.
153:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
458:(
444:(
349:(
313:(
299:(
230:(
216:(
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.