2153:
consensus and/or are not actually useful, and i think something should be done about that. photography articles on wikipedia, for the most part, are basically unreadable, and i've noticed that they often are misleading (especially if someone doesn't understand the jargon involved) or sometimes entirely misinformation, and i feel that lot of this comes from a desire to make categorisations and delineate between different things for the sake of it. in the case of mirrorless, there will inevitably be confusion and disagreement about what the word refers to, and i think that's something that should be celebrated and acknowledged, instead of trying to find an ultimate truth for what the term refers to and what it includes and excludes. as a photographer, i use mirrorless to refer to lots of non-interchangeable lens cameras, because they satisfy what i think of as mirrorless, and i think that explaining that that isn't how the term is usually used is a lot more valuable than trying to find jargon that specifically excludes my interpretation. i think that finding jargon specifically to exclude other types of cameras creates more confusion and misunderstanding and that it is a lot healthier to say what something is, and then address that there isn't consensus about what it refers to, or that there is, but that the term sucks and is inherently confusing, rather than trying to find an ultimate truth. cameras have more similar with each other than they have different, and i think implying that there are more different than they are is harmful. there really isnt all that much different between mirrorless cameras and dslrs, and especially between mirrorless and digital rangefinders.
380:
the ability to do so. Though this may not be explicitly stated in the article, this is the way most people in the photography field would define a "mirrorless". The Leica M8, M9, and Epson RD-1 do not use this method of image composition and focusing. They are mechanical M-mount rangefinders, just like the Leica film M's going back to the M3, and the current Bessa and Zeiss cameras. Digital rangefinders are rangefinders, not mirrorless cameras in this regard. Put more simply, if you take a layperson and hand them an
Olympus or Sony MILC, then a Leica M8 or M9, the Leica will be operated in a completely different way, as you compose with framelines, not on the LCD or an EVF, and your image through the viewfinder is not representative of the actual final image as it is on a MILC. However, the newest leica M-series rangefinder, refered to simply as the "M" with the internal designation "240", Not only has a mechanical/optical rangefinder mechanism like the older Leicas, but also has the ability to display a live view from the image sensor to the LCD screen or a separate detatchable eye-level electronic viewfinder. I would say that even though it has a rangefinder, its ability to display a live view from the sensor means that it is, in fact, a mirrorless camera in every sense of the word. If this is truly about the presence of a mirror, rather than the method of operation, A 4x5 view camera would also be "mirrorless", and it is clearly not. I think attention has to be paid here to the method of focus confirmation and composition of the image by the user, not merely the presence or nonpresence of a mirror in front of the sensor.
248:
down coming off the lens. As for AF differences: in an SLR, the mirror is what splits the light to go into the viewfinder with some of that light is passed through and mirrored down to the bottom of the camera if the SLR has auto-focus. A rangefinder has no AF, but does phase detect focusing by sampling with two separate viewfinders. An SLR achieves a similar trick by sampling the image coming from two ends of the lens. A prism in the AF system is used to achieve this trick (but it isn't the pentaprism). This is where your confusion comes from. (BTW, the X100 fits under rangefinder but not in a MILC because the lens is not interchangeable. When an SLR is not interchangeable it is called a ZLR which is a subset of "bridge" cameras. The X100 is a bridge rangefinder design so therefore not relevant to this article)
1212:"Not all MILCs have a large sensor: Pentax Q (announced in June 2011) has a 1/2.3" sensor (typical of compact cameras). In September 2011 a new sensor format was announced by Nikon for its first MILC: the CX format, with a sensor area 2.6 times bigger than the 1/1.7" sensor equipping high-end compact cameras, and about half the size of a Four Thirds sensor. The Sony NEX looks like a compact camera with a zoom lens, but has a larger sensor; its APS-C sensor is the same size as that of most (amateur) DSLRs. The Samsung NX10 (APS-C) and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 (Micro Four Thirds) have larger bodies and appearance similar to DSLRs, but are significantly smaller than entry-level DSLRs."
71:
53:
153:
135:
433:
didn't exist prior to the G1. Rangefinders already had their generic term, "rangefinder." No one who bought a rangefinder prior to the release of the G1 thought "I'm buying a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera!" Rather, they thought they were buying a rangefinder, intent on the rangefinder experience, regardless of whether DRangefinder or FRangefinder. Including the RD-1 and M8/9/10, etc., is retconning.
1711:"The space reclaimed from not having a mirror-box reduces the size of the camera but it is added to each of the lenses, since a "normal" X mm lens need to have X mm, counted from the sensor (focal plane) to a specific point of the lenses. The misconception of the size of the lenses came because many mirrorless systems have a smaller sensor. But a 50 mm "normal" non-telephoto lenses will always have 50 mm."
2175:
22:
1786:. Consensus is that although technically cameras with fixed lenses that don’t have mirrors are “mirrorless”, the term “mirrorless camera” is used almost exclusively to refer to those with interchangeable lenses and this is the common name for the topic of this article. In other words, the worst case is this topic is the primary topic for this term.
1166:
out of sensor. In general when talking about that, this should be a separate paragraph where the distinction is made between in sensor/film and out-of-sensor focus systems (CDAF is primarily in sensor, and PDAF is primarily out of sensor, but this is not always the case). Exceptions: Nikon 1, manual focusing without screens on a SLR, …
1356:" Is it correct to say that a crop factor has an effect on zoom range? I understand DOF and the way the photographer composes the shot are affected, but it's not 'physically impossible' to crop the center of the image on a larger sensor. Perhaps 'apparent zoom range' is better? Am I missing something?
2152:
something i've noticed about photography wikipedia pages, is that they rely heavily on jargon and categorisation and technical minutiae, rather than explaining the topic in general. i've also noticed, through reading talk pages and being a photographer, that a lot of the categorisations are not under
1165:
In the section on the Nikon 1, if you are going to mention that CDAF is not prone to calibration errors in the very next sentence, it deserves mentioning that this systems PDAF is on-sensor therefore is not prone to calibration issues either. Calibration issues is a function of it being in-sensor vs.
904:
As far as I know, as of today, all MILCs have mechanical shutters. There are cameras (not necessarily MILCs) that use both a mechanical and an electronic shutter (to provide a higher flash sync speed). Interestingly, there is at least one DSLR (there may be others) that has only an electronic shutter
218:
The Leica M8 and M9 were listed as mirrorless; it's my understanding that the optical overlay of a traditional rangefinder is indeed a pentaprism and thus not a mirrorless camera. As far as the EVIL acronym goes, it's also an optical viewfinder, thus it's not an EVIL in any case. That said, I don't
203:
Leica rangefinder cameras are mirrorless in the sense that they don't have a mirror in front of the sensor (or film). They do have an optical viewfinder. Since MILC was defined to make a distinction between reflex (e.g. SLRs or TLRs) and non-reflex system cameras, a Leica M or the Epson RD-1 camera
1843:
cameras without interchangeable lenses would then fall within the scope of the article (and there's already an article about those). Also, on today's market, it is obvious that a mirrorless camera is implicitly a digital camera rather than a film camera, but that was not true a generation ago. The
1208:
I feel this article is rather confusing and hard to read, as it has too many mentions of systems, sensor sizes and other technical details pertaining to one brand/model of camera or the other. I am not an expert in this topic and not very experienced with wiki guidelines either, but this paragraph
397:
Totally agreed with
Unixrevolution. In no way I can see Leica being mirrorless CSC. Leica never qualified itself do this category either, nor most of the companies do. I don't know why suddenly an article about mirrorless on Knowledge BEGINS with the photograph of Leica that hardly can be called a
379:
One of the things that classes a
Mirrorless camera in the sense that most photographers mean is not just the lack of a physical mirror, but also the mode of operation. That is, the camera takes a live image from the camera's imaging sensor and displays it on an EVF or on a screen, or at least has
292:
The subject of the article is a class of cameras which are digital, have interchangeable lens and are not SLR, i.e. don't have TTL optical viewfinder. Digital rangefinder cameras fit this definition. We cannot restrict article to only "EVIL" cameras (many don't have an electronic viewfinder) or to
247:
The article in it's current state was updated to reflect the above. Digital rangefinders (M8, M9, and R-D1) do not have a pentaprism, but they are optical viewfinders. The purpose of a pentaprism is to upright the image when viewed through the optical viewfinder because the regular image is upside
2130:
have written a new introductory section for the article. It now more clearly outlines the unique aspects and differences of mirrorless cameras, especially for people who may not be familiar with professional photography and the jargon surrounding it. With mirrorless cameras becoming more and more
1371:
The correct language here is "Field of View". A 50mm lens on a APS-C still has the same magnification, but the FoV is cropped to 75mm (in the case of a 1.5x crop factor). This can have give the illusion of the magnification being increased, but it is merely an optical crop. Confusion is added to
973:
While I can see why some might see this as some kind of unwanted original theory construction, it's an assertion that's backed by the whole article, it's common knowledge and it's actually such an obvious fact that I'm not sure if the tag is any more necessary there than for other claims in this
527:
Hi Nils von Barth / Nbarth - I just discovered you integrated / moved the 'evil camera' page, and indeed changed and added a lot to this subject. I consider it definitely as an improvement, so, thanks a lot! Keep up the good work. I might have some additional information especially concerning the
263:
Update: asked over on the l-camera-forum . It sounds like the M8 and M9 use essentially the same mechanism as predessors from at least the M3 on. So it seems either a) rangefinders should be excluded from this page (which frankly makes more sense); or b) all rangefinders should be included, which
1540:
Furthermore, this article divides cameras into types and names no longer generally recognized. The same is true for some other camera articles in the series. Extensive rewrite will be required to modernize the entire series of articles starting with an agreement about contemporary and prevailing
1392:
The article uses the "mirrorless" term a lot when referencing MILCs. This is very confusing, especially when describing the difference between a MILC (mirrorless, interchangeable lens) and a
Compact (mirrorless, non-interchangeable lens). I suggest we try to use the term "mirrorless" as least as
432:
Rangefinders should be removed. MILC, though a terrible term which should be abolished in favor of SLM or nearly anything else ("Honey, be sure to grab the MILC before we leave for the airport!" has never been and will never be uttered), is a generic term to describe a new camera category that
974:
article that are comparably "new" and "uncited" (like that the term MILC is "the most accurate one" or that these cameras "have generated significant excitement" or that they're "undermining the advantage that existing camera makers have in precision mechanical engineering" and many others). --
923:
This matches my understanding. Until the introduction of global shutters, an electronic shutter is inferior to the mechanical shutter, and can result in considerable rolling shutter effects. It's really only useful when silence or frame rate are important. I'd thus like to change the
204:
is a MILC. One should think of MILC as a super category with EVF and
Rangefinder categories. EVF can then be broken down into what you'd call "compact" and "(D)SLR-like" subcategories. Where would Fujifilm's X100 fit? Well, maybe you'll need a third "Hybrid" category.
1372:
this by the fact that not all digital cameras have the same sensor size in megapixels, so for example, a camera with a 24MP is going to produce a larger (physical) image than a 6MP sensor. So you have to make the FoV comparisons based on equal (in MP) sensor sizes.
1130:
Sony NEX was described as having a pseudo-APS-C sized sensor, while
Samsung NX a quasi-APS-C sensor. I have taken the libery to remove those qualifiers, because, while the sensors are, indeed, smaller than Advanced Photo System Classic film frame, I think the term
781:
interchangeable lens camera", so Sony SLTs should be removed, simply. A mention that SLTs fit EVIL terminology should be made, or a separate page on EVILs linking to MILCs and SLTs, saying EVIL = MILC + SLT should be added. Remember: DPreview has a poll on MILCs
745:
that Sony SLT cameras definetely are DSLR. Their mirror just does not move, that is the only difference from all other DSLRs. Therefore it can not be considered as mirrorless. About 'prismless', most of the DSLR do not have prism, instead it have pentamirror.
875:
Does a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera have a mechanical shutter (like today's normal DSLRs) or an electronic shutter (like today's compact cameras)? If it has an electronic shutter than one of its' benefits is an (almost) unlimited flash sync speed.
1895:
Although interpreting the meaning of the words individually might hypothetically give that impression, the MILC term is only used in this exact form (as far as I know) to refer to digital cameras. (Also you did not respond to my comment about confusion with
1252:
Another thing is that half of these sentences sound like an advertisement, not a fact (eg. Nikon 1 having AF faster than DSLRs - before my edit someone wrote it as an doubtful fact, which clearly isn't the case). We really need to have two things done here:
1412:
Mention of bridge cameras in the article about MILC cameras is superfluous and tangential. Bridge cameras are not interchangeable lens cameras and occupy their class of modern digital cameras. An article about bridge cameras already exists.
989:
What's funny is the Pentax Q belies this statement. It should be "The purpose of MILCs is to provide the versatility of use-specific lenses in a smaller body than dSLR cameras" (no citation needed because that's the ontology of the term MILCs)
1991:
After a little web searching, I am surprised to find that "mirrorless camera" does seem to usually refer to interchangeable-lens cameras (although the "interchangeable lens" clarification is typically also found somewhere in close proximity).
485:
I've cleaned up this article a bit from its original submission, but if there are any experts on video camera technology out there that find this, it could definitely use some attention from someone more knowledgeable regarding the topic.
1481:
The
Benefits and the Drawbacks section has 1 reference in it. I'm sure its accurate, but tbh unless someone feels like sourcing anything in here I'd suggest either deleting it, or including some brief points in a different section (with
1025:
These two should be put in exact same place as eg. Leica M8 - mention them in "Classification" section - M8 also doesn't fit the MILC type, but from different reasons (IMO it's actually closer to MILC definition than A55 and A33 is).
1736:
as being the most common abbreviation. I had never heard it, and there aren't many hits. It didn't occur to me until later to simply improve it, but it's done now. Is it time to add a discussion about the different abbreviations?
761:
DSLR cameras have TTL optical viewfinder with reflex mirror, and Sony SLT does not have TTL optical viewfinder. Sony SLT cameras are not "mirrorless" but they are EVIL, i.e. have
Electronic Viewfinder and Interchangeable Lens.
1917:- you can substitute "mirrorless camera" for "MILC" without changing the truth value of this proposition. Regarding point-and-shoot cameras, it seems commonly understood that this is a separate category from mirrorless cameras:
354:
Ah, sorry, I didn't see it in the table. I was thinking about the history section though, where the Leica M8 is mentioned and maybe should be replaced with the Epson R-D1 since it was released two years before the Leica M8?
1155:
The paragraph ordering is a little confusing. It probably needs to be broken up to start with some general discussion of the pro/con of contrast AF vs. phase detect and then separate paragraphs which describes each model
786:), suggesting that MILCs should reasonably become the industry-standard term for all those cameras. It depends on us and the MILC page on Knowledge whether such terms will spread and become standard, so I suggest to just
1353:
The small sensors on bridge cameras also boast an extremely high crop factor (typically above 5.0), thus allowing such cameras to achieve zoom ranges that are physically impossible on DSLRs and cameras utilizing larger
668:
The page seems to be called MILC now. I noticed that the term "MILC camera" crops up in places - that's redundant, isn't it? Should it be corrected, or would it be more confusing to just use 'MILC' in those places?
1307:
I am not a camera expert, but from what I know, the information in this article refers to what are most commonly known in the UK as
Compact System Cameras, and I have never heard the term MILC. But the page for that
2017:
Compact System Camera (CSC) tends to be the most popularly accepted term for cameras like this. MILC (Mirrorless
Interchangeable Lens Camera) or simply ILC, or just “Mirrorless” are also used, as well as “hybrid
548:
I think talking of entry-level DSLR sensors is confusing. As far as I know, APS-C sensors are for example used in all Canon DSLRs up to the 7D, which clearly is not an entry-level DSLR (nor is the 40d or 50d).
412:
Its pretty asinine to define "mirrorless" as "anything with a display", as Unixrevolution has above. The article requires a full history of mirrorless film cameras with interchangeable lenses since the 1930s.
1215:
Would a lot be lost if it was replaced by a one or two sentences that just said MILC sensor sizes ranged from comparable to compact camera to APS-C? The details are available in a table further down anyway!
1159:
Another factor contributing to the faster benchmarking of the Olympus and Nikon 1 vs. dSLR's is the smaller sensor (the DoF is larger so it doesn't have to iterate as long before a focus lock is achieved
1088:
I have not been able to figure out why the systems are sorted in this particular order. Is it market share, that puts Sony and Four Thirds on top? Wouldn't the "Relese date" not be a better default?
2011:– the current title is more precise, while the proposed title is quite ambiguous. Yes, the long term is commonly shortened, but that's not enough reason to make the article title more ambiguous.
1915:
Although interpreting the meaning of the words individually might hypothetically give that impression, the MILC term is only used in this exact form (as far as I know) to refer to digital cameras.
2249:
1559:
Thanks. I can't offer to contribute on the content, its something I know nothing about, but if you want me to check the text after you've finished your editing, I'm more than happy to help.
1169:
There is no discussion of the Leica M series being (while not AUTO-focusing) a phase detect, out of sensor style. Probably should drop in a reference to the subpart on rangefinders there.
1609:
2187:
1619:
1327:
I had a look and it was originally created as a redirect to this article. I changed it back to its original as the content there doesn't add anything new to the content here. -
1162:
CDAF (even on newer models) is slower than AF lock in dark conditions (currently). The wording seems to imply that Contrast AF is superior as long as the subject is not moving
1485:
Mirrorless equipping cameras: The heading and the text doesn't make sense. Maybe it does if you know about cameras, but its not well written and requires a re-write at least.
688:
How are Sony SLT cameras considered mirror-less cameras when they obviously have mirrors? They are subtype of DSLR cameras. Also, there's already an article for SLT cameras (
1869:
If that's the case, then the current title is inadequate as well, because there are many examples of pre-SLR cameras with interchangeable lenses and no mirror, e.g. the
2239:
111:
528:
speed of contrast detection autofocus versus phase detection autofocus. But I'll have to look that up, maybe, maybe, next week. I'll put it in the discussion first --
813:
cluttering the lede). Once a stable term emerges, but not before, we can use that throughout (e.g., MILC, ILC), and move the page to the proper name (if different).
1789:
1651:
1647:
1633:
641:
The term "MILC" (as opposed to EVIL) is becoming more popular in the forums these days. As it is also the title of this topic, should it not get a mention ?
117:
930:
Compared to DSLR cameras, mirrorless cameras are mechanically simpler and are often smaller, lighter, and quieter (since their electronic shutter is used)
840:
is not notable enough and I could not find any other usages of the acronym. Also, the word "Digital" is redundant when used with "Electronic Viewfinder". --
164:
140:
2134:
I'm not a professional photographer and I don't know much about cameras, so I helped by making sure the text was understandable to someone like me. :)
1610:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100516224100/http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/olympus_e_system_mirrorless_in_two_years_probably_news_295133.html
1209:--just an example, there are many other similar cases-- reads like if everyone wanted to make sure their prefered camera brand or model was mentioned:
2244:
2234:
1965:
must literally refer to all cameras that lack a mirror, as opposed to a specific type of such camera which is referred to as such in common usage. --
1477:
Hi everyone. I started doing some copy edits on the article, but I think it requires more than I can supply at this point. Some points to consider:
1014:" - SLTs are equal to DSLRs, these two are above entry-level and below advanced DSLR models. Also you write that these cameras have drawbacks like "
1312:) is just a stub, while this one is full of information (maybe too full). Perhaps this is because this page was mostly written about 5 years ago.
1620:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110930165551/http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/panasonic_primed_for_canon_and_nikon_fight_news_306149.html
1806:
1613:
1583:
87:
470:
2053:
1976:
1095:
414:
2203:
1497:] isn't an improvement? I realize that there might be some good content worth saving in there, but someone should point out what that is.
1848:, are mirrorless cameras, but those are not what this article is about. Knowledge is not just about what is currently on the market. —
1773:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1623:
1012:
an emerging class of digital system cameras, intermediate between compact digital cameras and digital single-lens reflex cameras (DSLRs)
856:
362:
1445:
A section devoted to benefits and drawbacks early in the article is redundant to a section about comparisons. Can these be combined?
1188:
The main problem, as with the whole article, is lack of references. We cannot say that X is faster/better than Y without a reference.--
1067:
I would propose that the sections on Advantages/Disadvantages be substantially removed. Useful redundancy exists, but this is not it.
1357:
1027:
975:
910:
312:
The Epson R-D1 was released in 2004. It should be included if the Leica M8 belongs here, since both are digital rangefinder cameras.
2131:
widely known, and Knowledge a common resource for looking up information, it makes sense for the introduction to be more accessible.
2012:
1870:
905:(the Nikon D40; the D40x has a mechanical shutter). One might assume that therefore MILCs, like DSLRs, have a limited shutter life. (
1629:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
906:
892:
790:
on the page and take position, finally decide on which term to use, citing the others as synonyms simply, and ending the confusion!
604:
550:
78:
58:
294:
2058:
1981:
1461:
1429:
280:
235:
1873:. I don't think there is any reasonable title which would precisely identify the intended scope, so we might as well use the
689:
809:
On terminology – since the terminology is not yet stable, I propose keeping alternative terms in the “Terminology” section (
219:
know enough about the internals of the M8 and M9 to know if they are now using some other technology for the rangefinding.
2117:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
657:
510:
I’ve significantly re-written and expanded (and re-named) the article; it could use work, but it’s now quite serviceable.
1694:
1599:
33:
1074:
1053:
328:
2020:
They don't list "mirrorless camera" as it doesn't really specify the category. If we'd go that far, why not just
2142:
1921:
1764:
1064:. Based on the writing so far, it's hard to believe some of the editors are even aware of these other articles.
2137:
The rest of the article could still use work on being more generally accessible, but we had to start somewhere!
1650:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2048:
1971:
1526:
Agreed, this article needs a lot of work. Deleting questionable and subjective passages would be a good start.
385:
1099:
418:
21:
1924:
1918:
860:
366:
2215:
2103:
1685:
1614:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/olympus_e_system_mirrorless_in_two_years_probably_news_295133.html
1591:
1361:
1031:
979:
914:
554:
2178:
This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
2138:
1587:
1457:
1425:
1070:
697:
471:
http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m9-forum/148189-question-about-rangefinding-mechanism.html
726:
I guess 'PILC' for 'prismless' would be more accurate ? But that would just be adding to the mayhem eh? (
381:
209:
2199:
1997:
1905:
1853:
1774:
1669:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1657:
1546:
1531:
1269:
1049:
888:
600:
496:
403:
39:
1590:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1317:
1957:
does not refer to any whale which happens to be blue, but rather a specific species of whale known as
884:
1950:
1874:
1814:
1797:
1624:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/panasonic_primed_for_canon_and_nikon_fight_news_306149.html
1453:
1449:
1421:
1417:
1091:
880:
645:
592:
358:
316:
268:
223:
1373:
324:
272:
227:
205:
2043:
1966:
1777:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1718:
1377:
1243:
1228:
1193:
1140:
1115:
1061:
838:
674:
533:
276:
231:
1313:
1289:
791:
434:
86:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2211:
2195:
2099:
2029:
1564:
1517:
1502:
1398:
1332:
970:
The purpose of micros is to provide high quality imaging in a smaller body than in DSLR cameras.
907:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/knowledge-center/why-digital-cameras-have-mechanical-shutters.html
1654:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1670:
320:
2158:
2086:
1962:
1878:
1818:
1810:
1746:
1293:
941:
795:
751:
742:
731:
693:
653:
438:
1993:
1931:
1901:
1886:
1864:
1849:
1826:
1542:
1527:
1265:
1178:
995:
822:
624:
596:
581:
576:- IMHO it's a very bad idea. Right now the ILCs are not only micro 4/3s - they are also the
518:
487:
399:
253:
1677:
2191:
1897:
1840:
1794:
70:
52:
1365:
1714:
1636:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1239:
1224:
1189:
1136:
1111:
670:
529:
1676:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2228:
2074:
2039:
2025:
1600:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100523023512/http://www.dpreview.com/previews/RicohGXR/
1560:
1513:
1498:
1394:
1328:
585:
569:
1135:
is, in general, used generously to describe all imaging surface roughly that size.--
2154:
2127:
2082:
1742:
1045:
This article attempts to define a very fuzzy category, and is therefore confusing.
937:
845:
767:
747:
727:
716:
649:
577:
345:
302:
293:
completely mirrorless cameras (you can find mirror not only in rangefinder, but in
159:
152:
134:
2174:
1927:
1882:
1822:
1643:
1174:
991:
818:
620:
514:
249:
83:
2042:
and not US or United States of America - just the right level of formality. --
2021:
1954:
1845:
1642:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1603:
1057:
2219:
2162:
2146:
2107:
2090:
2063:
2033:
2001:
1986:
1935:
1909:
1890:
1857:
1830:
1800:
1750:
1722:
1699:
1568:
1550:
1535:
1521:
1506:
1465:
1433:
1402:
1381:
1336:
1321:
1309:
1297:
1273:
1247:
1232:
1197:
1182:
1144:
1119:
1103:
1078:
1035:
999:
983:
945:
918:
896:
864:
849:
826:
799:
771:
755:
735:
720:
701:
692:). I suggested Sony SLT range should be removed from list of EVIL cameras.
678:
661:
628:
608:
558:
537:
522:
501:
442:
422:
407:
389:
370:
349:
332:
306:
284:
264:
would cloud the discussion of the modern trend toward mirrorless cameras.
257:
239:
213:
1839:: This would be a big change of scope and produce real ambiguity. All the
1223:
article: not every paragraph contains a comparison of available systems.--
1048:
The subjects covered in here are mostly covered in other articles such as
1016:
Contrast detection autofocus, rather than phase detection autofocus system
1512:
In the lack of any replies, I'm going to delete the replicated sections.
1173:(I'd make some changes, but it's been years since I've edited en wp) :-)
459:
1741:
seems the most descriptive to me, but it seems not to be very popular.
841:
763:
712:
341:
298:
2098:
per nomination. The current situation can and does lead to confusion.
1821:. None of the titles of the article's references use the full name.
588:. No reason at all to merge it unless author have anything to add?
1491:
Actually, the more I look at it the weirder the whole thing looks.
1238:
I agree, we already have a table that lists available systems. --
783:
1220:
1844:
cameras used by the general public 30+ years ago, such as the
15:
297:). "Mirrorless" in the article title means just "non-SLR". --
1393:
possible, and possibly add a sentence about this confusion.
1594:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1286:
The last sentence in the Benefits section is incomplete.
1022:" - while that's CLEARLY not the case with A55 and A33.
1709:
I removed this as it seems confused, what do you think?
573:
1264:
as in the current form it leaves much to be desired.
837:
I removed DEVIL acronym from the lead - source given
1041:
This article should be broken into separate articles
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1646:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1256:Clean-up from constant comparisons between systems
116:This article has not yet received a rating on the
2250:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
2169:Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture
1488:Why are there 3 sections devoted to comparisons?
1310:https://en.wikipedia.org/Compact_System_cameras
507:Hi Ginsengbomb – thanks for your yeoman’s work!
1632:This message was posted before February 2018.
1900:cameras without interchangeable lenses.) —
619:I am against the merge too. Makes no sence.--
8:
174:Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
19:
1763:The following is a closed discussion of a
1604:http://www.dpreview.com/previews/RicohGXR/
177:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
129:
47:
1582:I have just modified 3 external links on
2240:Unknown-importance Photography articles
2038:Kind of like why we have an article at
1575:External links modified (February 2018)
452:
131:
49:
1914:
1807:Mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera
1584:Mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera
1010:Article clearly says in first lines: "
460:http://photozone.de/slr-vs-rangefinder
2122:Edited lede to be more understandable
1732:I reverted a couple of references to
1204:Too many mentions of specific systems
855:"EVIL redirects here." xD I love it.
7:
1782:The result of the move request was:
1020:Incompatibility with existing lenses
76:This article is within the scope of
2073:. This implies no change of scope,
1961:. Likewise, there is no reason why
38:It is of interest to the following
2183:
2179:
295:some electronic viewfinder designs
14:
1586:. Please take a moment to review
96:Knowledge:WikiProject Photography
2245:WikiProject Photography articles
2235:Start-Class Photography articles
2186:. Further details are available
2173:
2113:The discussion above is closed.
1441:Benefits, Drawbacks, Comparisons
1343:Misleading use of 'crop factor'?
151:
133:
99:Template:WikiProject Photography
69:
51:
20:
1877:, which, happily, is also more
572:suggested a merger in revision
2220:19:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
2081:although they are mirrorless.
827:22:24, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
784:http://www.dpreview.com/polls/
736:22:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
690:Single-lens translucent camera
214:06:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
180:Guild of Copy Editors articles
1:
2210:— Assignment last updated by
2077:are for example never called
1569:07:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
1551:16:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
1536:19:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
1495:Is there any good reason why
865:14:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
772:16:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
756:16:01, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
721:16:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
702:12:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
443:01:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
390:14:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
90:and see a list of open tasks.
1723:12:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
1700:01:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
1522:10:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
1507:11:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
1298:16:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1120:10:50, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
1104:10:40, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
1079:15:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
946:07:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
871:Shutter and flash sync speed
850:08:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
679:18:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
371:14:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
350:10:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
333:17:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
307:08:14, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
285:03:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
240:00:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
1756:Requested move 21 July 2021
1473:Major re-structure required
1466:12:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
1434:12:22, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
1388:Confusing "mirrorless" term
1342:
1259:Clean-up from advertisement
662:22:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
629:06:34, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
609:18:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
559:20:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
423:06:57, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
2266:
2163:12:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
2147:13:53, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
2108:01:41, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
1801:05:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
1705:Confused crop factor info?
1663:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1579:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1382:14:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
1366:13:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
1175:- tychay (tchay@wikimedia)
1006:A55 and A33 wrongly placed
992:- tychay (tchay@wikimedia)
897:11:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
788:remove all SLT occurrences
777:The title of the page is "
340:It is already included. --
250:- tychay (tchay@wikimedia)
118:project's importance scale
2091:21:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
2064:04:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
2034:04:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
2002:04:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1987:02:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1936:11:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1910:01:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1891:01:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1858:00:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
1831:18:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
1751:02:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
1403:14:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
1337:18:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
1322:16:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
1274:23:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
1156:compensations/exceptions.
1150:Auto-focus minor cleanup?
1145:10:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
637:"MILC" term more popular.
408:23:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
146:
115:
64:
46:
2115:Please do not modify it.
1770:Please do not modify it.
1541:naming of camera types.
1084:System comparison lineup
1036:19:41, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
984:19:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
919:19:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
800:12:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
538:14:29, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
523:03:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
502:19:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
1248:08:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1233:07:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1198:06:24, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
1183:00:20, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
1000:00:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
398:MILC in a first place.
258:00:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
79:WikiProject Photography
1408:Bridge Camera - remove
1303:Compact System Cameras
28:This article is rated
2190:. Student editor(s):
1959:Balaenoptera musculus
171:Guild of Copy Editors
165:Guild of Copy Editors
141:Guild of Copy Editors
1871:Leica Schraubgewinde
1644:regular verification
711:EVIL, see below. --
162:by a member of the
102:Photography articles
1634:After February 2018
1349:4.1: Bridge cameras
1126:Pseudo/quasi-APS-C?
1062:Image sensor format
584:, not saying about
2188:on the course page
2079:mirrorless cameras
1688:InternetArchiveBot
1639:InternetArchiveBot
199:Mirrorless Leicas?
34:content assessment
1963:Mirrorless camera
1811:Mirrorless camera
1793:
1790:non-admin closure
1664:
1469:
1452:comment added by
1437:
1420:comment added by
1094:comment added by
1071:Michael Barkowski
900:
883:comment added by
817:—Nils von Barth (
665:
648:comment added by
612:
595:comment added by
513:—Nils von Barth (
361:comment added by
336:
319:comment added by
288:
271:comment added by
243:
226:comment added by
196:
195:
192:
191:
188:
187:
158:This article was
128:
127:
124:
123:
2257:
2222:
2204:article contribs
2200:Supportiveisle13
2185:
2181:
2177:
1868:
1787:
1772:
1698:
1689:
1662:
1661:
1640:
1468:
1446:
1436:
1414:
1106:
966:
965:
961:
899:
877:
671:Denny de la Haye
664:
642:
611:
589:
499:
494:
481:Expert attention
473:
468:
462:
457:
373:
335:
313:
287:
265:
242:
220:
182:
181:
178:
175:
172:
155:
148:
147:
137:
130:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2265:
2264:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2225:
2224:
2209:
2184:7 December 2024
2171:
2139:CauliflowerMoon
2124:
2119:
2118:
1898:point-and-shoot
1862:
1841:point-and-shoot
1768:
1758:
1730:
1707:
1692:
1687:
1655:
1648:have permission
1638:
1592:this simple FaQ
1577:
1475:
1447:
1443:
1415:
1410:
1390:
1345:
1305:
1284:
1206:
1152:
1128:
1089:
1086:
1043:
1008:
967:
963:
959:
957:
956:
931:
878:
873:
835:
807:
686:
684:Sony SLT range?
643:
639:
590:
566:
546:
497:
488:
483:
478:
477:
476:
469:
465:
458:
454:
356:
314:
266:
221:
201:
179:
176:
173:
170:
169:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
2263:
2261:
2253:
2252:
2247:
2242:
2237:
2227:
2226:
2180:19 August 2024
2170:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2126:Hello! I and @
2123:
2120:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2093:
2075:pocket cameras
2068:
2067:
2066:
2006:
2005:
2004:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1804:
1780:
1779:
1765:requested move
1759:
1757:
1754:
1729:
1726:
1706:
1703:
1682:
1681:
1674:
1627:
1626:
1618:Added archive
1616:
1608:Added archive
1606:
1598:Added archive
1576:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1493:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1483:
1474:
1471:
1442:
1439:
1409:
1406:
1389:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1344:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1304:
1301:
1283:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1151:
1148:
1127:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1096:188.154.38.113
1085:
1082:
1042:
1039:
1007:
1004:
1003:
1002:
972:
955:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
872:
869:
868:
867:
834:
831:
830:
829:
806:
803:
775:
774:
724:
723:
685:
682:
638:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
614:
613:
565:
562:
545:
542:
541:
540:
525:
511:
508:
482:
479:
475:
474:
463:
451:
450:
446:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
415:93.223.194.254
382:Unixrevolution
377:
376:
375:
374:
310:
309:
261:
260:
200:
197:
194:
193:
190:
189:
186:
185:
183:
156:
144:
143:
138:
126:
125:
122:
121:
114:
108:
107:
105:
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2262:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2243:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2232:
2230:
2223:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2212:Mr.Stark87643
2207:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2196:Mr.Stark87643
2193:
2189:
2176:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2135:
2132:
2129:
2121:
2116:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2100:Sean Stephens
2097:
2094:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2069:
2065:
2062:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2052:
2051:
2047:
2046:
2041:
2040:United States
2037:
2036:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2014:
2010:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1985:
1984:
1980:
1979:
1975:
1974:
1970:
1969:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1951:WP:COMMONNAME
1948:
1945:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1922:
1919:
1916:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1875:WP:COMMONNAME
1872:
1866:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1842:
1838:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1815:WP:COMMONNAME
1812:
1808:
1803:
1802:
1799:
1796:
1791:
1785:
1778:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1760:
1755:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1735:
1727:
1725:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1704:
1702:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1690:
1679:
1675:
1672:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1659:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1580:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1407:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1302:
1300:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1281:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1217:
1213:
1210:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1083:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1065:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1054:System Camera
1051:
1046:
1040:
1038:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
987:
986:
985:
981:
977:
971:
962:
953:
947:
943:
939:
935:
934:
933:
932:
922:
921:
920:
916:
912:
908:
903:
902:
901:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
870:
866:
862:
858:
857:79.219.26.115
854:
853:
852:
851:
847:
843:
839:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
815:
814:
812:
804:
802:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
780:
773:
769:
765:
760:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
744:
741:I agree with
739:
737:
733:
729:
722:
718:
714:
710:
706:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
683:
681:
680:
676:
672:
666:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
636:
630:
626:
622:
618:
617:
616:
615:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
568:
567:
563:
561:
560:
556:
552:
543:
539:
535:
531:
526:
524:
520:
516:
512:
509:
506:
505:
504:
503:
500:
495:
493:
492:
480:
472:
467:
464:
461:
456:
453:
449:
445:
444:
440:
436:
424:
420:
416:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
372:
368:
364:
363:80.245.230.14
360:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
308:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
259:
255:
251:
246:
245:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
216:
215:
211:
207:
198:
184:
167:
166:
161:
157:
154:
150:
149:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
119:
113:
110:
109:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2208:
2172:
2136:
2133:
2125:
2114:
2095:
2078:
2070:
2059:
2054:
2049:
2044:
2016:
2008:
1982:
1977:
1972:
1967:
1958:
1946:
1836:
1805:
1783:
1781:
1769:
1762:
1738:
1733:
1731:
1710:
1708:
1686:
1683:
1658:source check
1637:
1631:
1628:
1581:
1578:
1494:
1476:
1448:— Preceding
1444:
1416:— Preceding
1411:
1391:
1358:36.54.64.147
1352:
1348:
1346:
1306:
1288:
1285:
1218:
1214:
1211:
1207:
1172:
1132:
1129:
1090:— Preceding
1087:
1069:
1066:
1047:
1044:
1028:83.26.135.65
1024:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1009:
976:91.89.230.62
969:
968:
911:91.89.230.62
879:— Preceding
874:
836:
810:
808:
787:
778:
776:
743:Satellite779
740:
725:
708:
694:Satellite779
687:
667:
640:
547:
490:
489:
484:
466:
455:
447:
431:
378:
315:— Preceding
311:
262:
217:
202:
163:
77:
40:WikiProjects
2013:This source
1994:BarrelProof
1902:BarrelProof
1865:BarrelProof
1850:BarrelProof
1775:move review
1543:Bengt Nyman
1528:Bengt Nyman
1347:In section
1266:SkywalkerPL
885:Itamarhason
805:Terminology
644:—Preceding
597:SkywalkerPL
591:—Preceding
551:82.212.0.72
544:Sensor size
400:SkywalkerPL
357:—Preceding
267:—Preceding
222:—Preceding
160:copy edited
93:Photography
84:photography
59:Photography
30:Start-class
2229:Categories
2192:Figuer61PU
2022:Mirrorless
1955:Blue whale
1879:WP:CONCISE
1846:Instamatic
1819:WP:CONCISE
1695:Report bug
1454:Wizardly79
1422:Wizardly79
1351:, I read "
936:Thoughts?
779:MIRRORLESS
578:NEX system
448:References
2045:King of ♥
2018:cameras”.
1968:King of ♥
1715:Lopifalko
1678:this tool
1671:this tool
1374:Bobcooley
1240:Racklever
1225:Polymeris
1219:C.f. the
1190:Racklever
1137:Polymeris
1112:Racklever
1058:Autofocus
707:Sony SLT
574:379063247
530:Yvolution
273:Deirdresm
228:Deirdresm
206:Guy Paris
2026:Dicklyon
1684:Cheers.—
1561:Scribolt
1514:Scribolt
1499:Scribolt
1482:sources)
1462:contribs
1450:unsigned
1430:contribs
1418:unsigned
1395:Lonaowna
1354:sensors.
1329:Takeaway
1282:Benefits
1092:unsigned
893:contribs
881:unsigned
658:contribs
646:unsigned
605:contribs
593:unsigned
580:and the
570:MaGioZal
491:ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ
359:unsigned
329:contribs
317:unsigned
281:contribs
269:unsigned
236:contribs
224:unsigned
2155:Lynxano
2128:Lynxano
2096:Support
2083:Andrewa
2071:Support
1947:Support
1743:Groogle
1588:my edit
1314:Kylotan
1290:Dcell59
1018:" and "
958:?": -->
938:Groogle
792:Darrask
748:RedAndr
728:Preroll
650:Preroll
586:Leica M
435:Mlebold
2009:Oppose
1928:Rublov
1883:Rublov
1837:Oppose
1823:Rublov
1813:– Per
819:nbarth
621:Kozuch
564:Merger
515:nbarth
36:scale.
2015:says
1728:DSLT?
1133:APS-C
1110:Done
924:claim
833:DEVIL
2216:talk
2182:and
2159:talk
2143:talk
2104:talk
2087:talk
2030:talk
1998:talk
1992:—
1949:per
1932:talk
1906:talk
1887:talk
1854:talk
1827:talk
1817:and
1784:Move
1747:talk
1739:EVIL
1734:DSLT
1719:talk
1565:talk
1547:talk
1532:talk
1518:talk
1503:talk
1458:talk
1426:talk
1399:talk
1378:talk
1362:talk
1333:talk
1318:talk
1294:talk
1270:talk
1244:talk
1229:talk
1221:DSLR
1194:talk
1179:talk
1141:talk
1116:talk
1100:talk
1075:talk
1060:and
1032:talk
996:talk
980:talk
960:edit
942:talk
915:talk
909:) --
889:talk
861:talk
846:talk
823:talk
796:talk
768:talk
752:talk
732:talk
717:talk
698:talk
675:talk
654:talk
625:talk
601:talk
555:talk
534:talk
519:talk
498:bomb
439:talk
419:talk
404:talk
386:talk
367:talk
346:talk
325:talk
321:Pgmj
303:talk
277:talk
254:talk
232:talk
210:talk
2206:).
2024:?
1795:В²C
1652:RfC
1622:to
1612:to
1602:to
1050:EVF
821:) (
811:not
517:) (
112:???
2231::
2218:)
2198:,
2194:,
2161:)
2145:)
2106:)
2089:)
2032:)
2000:)
1953:.
1934:)
1926:.
1923:,
1920:,
1908:)
1889:)
1881:.
1856:)
1829:)
1809:→
1767:.
1749:)
1721:)
1665:.
1660:}}
1656:{{
1567:)
1549:)
1534:)
1520:)
1505:)
1464:)
1460:•
1432:)
1428:•
1401:)
1380:)
1364:)
1335:)
1320:)
1296:)
1272:)
1246:)
1231:)
1196:)
1181:)
1143:)
1118:)
1102:)
1077:)
1056:,
1052:,
1034:)
998:)
982:)
944:)
917:)
895:)
891:•
863:)
848:)
842:M5
825:)
798:)
770:)
764:M5
762:--
754:)
738:)
734:)
719:)
713:M5
709:is
700:)
677:)
660:)
656:•
627:)
607:)
603:•
582:NX
557:)
536:)
521:)
441:)
421:)
413:--
406:)
388:)
369:)
348:)
342:M5
331:)
327:•
305:)
299:M5
283:)
279:•
256:)
238:)
234:•
212:)
2214:(
2202:(
2157:(
2141:(
2102:(
2085:(
2060:♠
2055:♣
2050:♦
2028:(
1996:(
1983:♠
1978:♣
1973:♦
1930:(
1904:(
1885:(
1867::
1863:@
1852:(
1825:(
1798:☎
1792:)
1788:(
1745:(
1717:(
1713:-
1697:)
1693:(
1680:.
1673:.
1563:(
1545:(
1530:(
1516:(
1501:(
1456:(
1424:(
1397:(
1376:(
1360:(
1331:(
1316:(
1308:(
1292:(
1268:(
1242:(
1227:(
1192:(
1177:(
1139:(
1114:(
1098:(
1073:(
1030:(
994:(
978:(
964:]
954:?
940:(
913:(
887:(
859:(
844:(
794:(
782:(
766:(
750:(
730:(
715:(
696:(
673:(
652:(
623:(
599:(
553:(
532:(
437:(
417:(
402:(
384:(
365:(
344:(
323:(
301:(
275:(
252:(
230:(
208:(
168:.
120:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
