432:
420:
243:
222:
1283:
ignorant of pageants) may not find this useful. And there are also lists of delegates per edition made available in the
Internet. Then again, this article's list may be more informative as it provides age and height of the delegates. Together with some other information (trivia, results, etc.), this article may actually be useful, as leading pageant websites remove such feature pages whenever a new edition is about to take place. --
338:
311:
348:
191:
1241:, which did not include a list of delegates)... and second, if the list is retained, should it be separated into continents or be listed alphabetically? I would prefer alphabetically, because with the three-column formatting the headings are difficult to view and this list practically requires you to use "find" to find the delegate you want. --
1631:. I'm trying to find a third-party source from a news organisation but no luck yet. My interpretation is that it would be acceptable to list them in either order here, either alphabetically with a disclaimer that it is alphabetical, or by the order listed on the Miss Universe site with no disclaimer as there is no such explanation available.
1708:. In the fact of this, we either have to make the decision to put it in alphabetical order (and put a disclaimer as such) or to simply put it in the order used by MUO with no disclaimer. When there is no clear path, I'd say the best thing to do is just use MUO's order, but really there's no really obvious right or wrong way.
1515:
I wonder that you don't understand what I am talking about, even it's
English. I've given you all proofs (official related video clips and other pageant websites as Pageantopolis and Pageant-Almanac) that show MUO didn't arrange exact placements of top 10 and top 20 of Miss Universe 2006, as well as
1626:
I agree with your comments regarding verifiability, but the difficulty is that there is nothing on the Miss
Universe press site link which states any reason that the contestants are listed that way - i.e. some recognition that they are "listed in alphabetical order", "listed in call-out order" or
1403:
I currently think the look of the delegates table is terrible and that there are MoS issues here. I propose removing all the bolding etc, but also think that the heights and ages should be removed to reduce space, and because I think this information is not necessary here. I propose redoing the
1282:
I prefer the alphabetical listing. Or more exactly, how about putting these information in a table (i.e. column for country, name, age, height, placing at Ms. Universe), in that way, it will be easier to navigate instead of the current arrangement. In terms of relevance, people (esp those who are
472:
Detail of Miss
Universe pageants in recent years, according to MUO website and Order of announcement during the Live Telecast - they are similar. There was no exact placements in top 10 and top 20 that year so please don't changed alphabetical order of country name. Thank you.
1516:
2 latest editions as well. BTW, when you do that with only MU 2006 when Canada has placed for the last time? Not with 2007 and 2008 pageants which also have the same case with this one? Look and read it as more as you can to when you already understand it. Thank you.
1752:
Since no scores were shown on TV or made public elsewhere from 2003 to 2006, there should be a source for the scores that are published in the entry. It looks like a fabrication otherwise. Again, the Miss
Universe pageant did NOT show competition scores that year.
1357:
If you can rewrite it so that it has an encyclopaedic tone and is backed by reliable source evidence you are welcome to include it. In the form that it was in it was not suitable (I was not the one who deleted it but I agree with that decision). --
1574:
and they all have different placements than the ones listed on
Knowledge respective articles for each year. In some of them there isn't any source cited for the rankings, on others is cited only unofficial sources known for their errors
1292:
Well I returned it to alphabetical last night and took out the "excess" names -- I guess this is useful in that it provides wikilinks to delegates who did not place, but it definitely needed to go back to straight alphabetising. --
1604:
Knowledge's verifiability policy states that the standard is verifiability, meaning, whether readers are able to check that material added to
Knowledge has already been published by a reliable source, and this reliable source is
153:
1677:
Please, take a look at the
Reference part of this article for example (Miss Universe 2006), and you will see that one of the editors has made all kinds of assumptions, he/she even listed "evidence" above which is
1442:
As there has been no comment in the five days since I left that message I will go ahead and reformat the table. If you object, please leave comments here rather than reverting, so we can discuss the issue. --
1682:
and as you pointed out not acceptable, right? Is it an acceptable source if a contestant from any of the above years has mentioned her placement in an interview with a news organization in a video or article?
1803:
There is someone, I believe a random IP, changing the results and adding MU 2013 candidates. Can he be banned from editing? Is there something we can do? He does this on other Miss
Universe pages as well.
1540:
Angelo de la Paz, this is your subjective interpretation based on your own assumptions. Your opinion is not neutral because you're deleting repeatedly the official Miss
Universe link with the placements
445:
321:
1485:
Angelo de la Paz, the things you listed in regards to Miss Universe 2006 are irrelevant; it's your own interpretation and it has never been published in an official Miss Universe article.
1666:
also if you make the opposite assumption that they are not in placement order? At least if the contestants were listed in Knowledge articles in the same order listed on the official site
1655:
Hello PageantUpdater and thank you for responding. I always enjoy reading your talk page because you always try to be as neutral as possible and to provide the most reliable sources.
1389:
I think this deserves to be mentioned, but we do need facts. At least a translation of what exactly the translator said to Miss Japan. I'll see if I can get my hands on one.
147:
1931:
283:
293:
1864:
1860:
1846:
1731:
Is a source acceptable, if a contestant from any of the above years, has mentioned her placement in an interview with a news organization in a video or article?
1956:
1194:
I believe the note about there being a top twenty should not be included until there is a more reliable source than Global Beauties to verify it. Opinions? --
1951:
1334:
Hey, this is quite a useful piece on the pageant. i have saved it in my local m/c lest some one remove the details )people have questioned there relevance.--
450:
1941:
410:
400:
259:
79:
44:
1926:
1832:
1961:
1946:
376:
250:
227:
85:
1670:, there wouldn't be any confusion because if people wanted to know more they could contact the original source (Miss Universe Organization,
1936:
1719:
1642:
1457:
1422:
487:
Note: There was a small order mistake of Denmark's placement on MUO website. There was no exact placements in top 10 and top 20 that year.
1273:
I think that having a list of delegates is good, but I liked it much better when it was alphabetical instead of grouped by continents. --
1793:
1842:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1547:
You are preventing other editors to add verifiable sources and this is against Knowledge policies. What you are doing is vandalism.
258:, their contestants and winners on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
361:
316:
168:
135:
99:
30:
104:
20:
1596:
is unreliable because they have listed the rankings for the rest of the top 15 in Miss Universe 2005, but the official site
1116:
74:
1907:
1173:
202:
1570:
All of Miss Universe 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, and 2002 placements can be found on the official Miss Universe link
1372:
1307:
1255:
1208:
1777:
65:
129:
1833:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060810130230/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003147861_miss24.html
1521:
1463:
1428:
1378:
1313:
1261:
1214:
1129:
1101:
437:
1863:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1715:
1638:
1451:
1416:
1366:
1301:
1249:
1202:
125:
1658:
In regards to what you said above "Making the assumption that they are in placement order is thus effectively
1898:
1824:
109:
1836:
175:
1738:
1690:
1627:"listed in placement order". Making the assumption that they are in placement order is thus effectively
1616:
1882:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1870:
1517:
1097:
208:
1823:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1794:
http://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/2006/04/14/Trump-calls-Miss-Iraq-very-brave/UPI-68291145060263/
1765:
1734:
1686:
1612:
1565:
Errors in the placements of Miss Universe 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, and 2002 listed on Knowledge
190:
1711:
1634:
1444:
1409:
1359:
1294:
1242:
1195:
419:
161:
55:
1593:
1580:
488:
375:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1816:
1550:
1502:
1405:
1335:
1238:
1234:
907:
715:
478:
70:
24:
1867:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
141:
1883:
1576:
931:
739:
502:
353:
51:
1554:
1506:
1890:
242:
221:
1773:
1758:
1390:
1849:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1704:
they put them in that order. Deciding one way or another, as you correctly stated, is
255:
1889:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1478:
Do not delete the official Miss Universe link of the placements for Miss Universe 2006
1920:
1115:
When wikilinking to a delegate on this list, please remember to add the delegate to
1705:
1679:
1663:
1659:
1628:
1274:
1181:
1606:
1597:
1542:
1497:
926:
734:
497:
337:
310:
1233:
I have two questions... first, should this even include a list of delegates (see
1856:
1284:
1671:
1667:
1586:
1571:
1855:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1769:
1754:
1349:
935:
933:
743:
741:
506:
504:
427:
371:
366:
343:
1912:
1781:
1742:
1725:
1694:
1648:
1620:
1558:
1525:
1510:
1469:
1434:
1393:
1384:
1352:
1338:
1319:
1287:
1277:
1267:
1220:
1184:
1105:
1837:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003147861_miss24.html
1488:
An official article of the placings exists and it should have priority.
1408:. I will make the changes in a few days if there is no objection. --
917:
725:
1494:
Do not delete the official Miss Universe link of the placements:
1491:
Knowledge states that "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable"
1225:
Since when is Cyprus situated in Asia and Bahamas in Europe????
1594:
http://www.pageant-almanac.com/miss-universe/semi-finalists.php
1589:
with all the information about the ranking in the above years.
1581:
http://www.pageant-almanac.com/miss-universe/semi-finalists.php
184:
15:
1585:
The general official site is given, but not the direct link
1577:
http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/universe_2006.htm
418:
1827:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1600:
doesn't have them even listed(they have only 10 listed).
365:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1820:
1609:, not the websites of pageantpolis and pageantalmanac.
160:
254:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1859:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1172:I have removed the "predicted list of winners" per
1176:. This should not be here, I think, unless it is
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1607:http://www.missuniverse.com/press/05.30.05.html
1598:http://www.missuniverse.com/press/05.30.05.html
1543:http://www.missuniverse.com/press/07.23.06.html
1498:http://www.missuniverse.com/press/07.23.06.html
1845:This message was posted before February 2018.
599:Charm Onwarin Osathanond, Miss Thailand (5th)
174:
8:
1672:http://www.missuniverse.com/press/index.html
1668:http://www.missuniverse.com/press/index.html
1587:http://www.missuniverse.com/press/index.html
1572:http://www.missuniverse.com/press/index.html
1700:The fact is that we're never going to know
1815:I have just modified one external link on
916:Official placements of Miss Universe 2008
833:Miss Czech Republic, Lucie Hadasova. (5th)
724:Official placements of Miss Universe 2007
305:
216:
1348:why was the controversy portion removed?
1025:Miss Czech Republic, Eliska Buckova (5th)
1932:High-importance Beauty Pageants articles
921:
763:Miss Mexico, Rosa Maria Ojeda Cuen (5th)
729:
517:Kenisha Thom, Miss Trinidad/Tobago (2nd)
492:
1016:Miss South Africa, Tansey Coetzee (2nd)
830:Miss Ukraine, Lyudmyla Bikmullina (4th)
307:
218:
188:
930:Order of announcement (Live Telecast)
821:Miss Thailand, Farung Yuthithum; (1st)
760:Miss Nicaragua, Xiomara Blandino (4th)
738:Order of announcement (Live Telecast)
608:Magali Romitelli, Miss Argentina (8th)
593:Betina Faurbye, Miss Denmark (mistake)
526:Valerie Dominguez, Miss Colombia (5th)
501:Order of announcement (Live Telecast)
1117:Category:Miss Universe 2006 delegates
268:Knowledge:WikiProject Beauty Pageants
7:
1957:Los Angeles area task force articles
946:Miss Australia, Laura Dundovic (2nd)
757:Miss Tanzania, Flaviana Matata (3rd)
596:Josephine Alhanko, Miss Sweden (4th)
359:This article is within the scope of
271:Template:WikiProject Beauty Pageants
248:This article is within the scope of
1952:Low-importance Los Angeles articles
1013:Miss Vietnam, Lam Thuy Nguyen (1st)
611:Inna Tsymbaliuk, Miss Ukraine (9th)
523:Priscila Perales, Miss Mexico (4th)
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1942:Low-importance California articles
1111:Addition of delegates to this list
955:Miss Italy, Claudia Ferraris (5th)
824:Miss Denmark, Zak lina Sojic (2nd)
590:Rafeala Zanella, Miss Brazil (3rd)
14:
1819:. Please take a moment to review
1022:Miss Hungary, Jazmin Dammak (4th)
827:Miss Slovenia, Tjasa Kokalj (3rd)
602:Adrienn Bende, Miss Hungary (6th)
587:Anna Litvinova, Miss Russia (2nd)
520:Desiree Duran, Miss Bolivia (3rd)
514:Alice Panikian, Miss Canada (1st)
1927:C-Class Beauty Pageants articles
943:Miss Kosovo, Zana Krasniqi (1st)
584:Dina Fekadu, Miss Ethiopia (1st)
430:
385:Knowledge:WikiProject California
346:
336:
309:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1962:WikiProject California articles
1662:." I agree with. But isn't it
952:Miss USA, Crystle Stewart (4th)
754:Miss Angola, Micaela Reis (2nd)
405:This article has been rated as
388:Template:WikiProject California
288:This article has been rated as
949:Miss Spain, Claudia Moro (3rd)
468:No exact placements as of 2006
1:
1399:Formatting of delegates table
1394:06:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1180:from a reputable predictor.--
1019:Miss Japan, Hiroko Mima (3rd)
443:This article is supported by
379:and see a list of open tasks.
262:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1947:C-Class Los Angeles articles
1761:) 19:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
751:Miss India, Puja Gupta (1st)
605:Neha Kapur, Miss India (7th)
1937:C-Class California articles
1385:05:53, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
1353:05:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
446:Los Angeles area task force
251:WikiProject Beauty Pageants
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1978:
1876:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1812:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1743:22:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
1726:19:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
1695:16:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
1649:23:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
1621:14:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
1559:20:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
1526:16:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
1511:11:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
1470:09:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
1435:07:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
1106:11:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
438:Greater Los Angeles portal
411:project's importance scale
294:project's importance scale
1913:09:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
1782:14:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
1339:08:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
1320:21:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
1288:13:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
1278:17:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
1268:04:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
1221:21:58, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
1164:05:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
426:
404:
331:
287:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1799:Someone changing results
1748:Final Competition Scores
1185:19:44, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
274:Beauty Pageants articles
1808:External links modified
1404:table in the format of
423:
362:WikiProject California
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1174:WP:Not a crystal ball
422:
100:Neutral point of view
1857:regular verification
1344:controversy removed?
105:No original research
1847:After February 2018
1482:Miss Universe 2006
391:California articles
1901:InternetArchiveBot
1852:InternetArchiveBot
1817:Miss Universe 2006
1406:Miss Universe 2007
1239:Miss Universe 2004
1235:Miss Universe 2005
908:Miss Universe 2008
716:Miss Universe 2007
479:Miss Universe 2006
424:
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
25:Miss Universe 2006
1877:
1785:
1768:comment added by
1722:
1680:original research
1664:original research
1660:original research
1645:
1629:original research
1468:
1433:
1383:
1318:
1266:
1229:List of Delegates
1219:
1095:
1094:
925:According to MUO
903:
902:
733:According to MUO
711:
710:
496:According to MUO
465:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
354:California portal
304:
303:
300:
299:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1969:
1911:
1902:
1875:
1874:
1853:
1784:
1762:
1714:
1637:
1518:Angelo De La Paz
1466:
1460:
1454:
1450:
1447:
1431:
1425:
1419:
1415:
1412:
1381:
1375:
1369:
1365:
1362:
1316:
1310:
1304:
1300:
1297:
1264:
1258:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1217:
1211:
1205:
1201:
1198:
1190:Top 20 - Source?
1163:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1098:Angelo De La Paz
922:
730:
493:
440:
435:
434:
433:
393:
392:
389:
386:
383:
356:
351:
350:
349:
340:
333:
332:
327:
324:
313:
306:
276:
275:
272:
269:
266:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1977:
1976:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1917:
1916:
1905:
1900:
1868:
1861:have permission
1851:
1825:this simple FaQ
1810:
1801:
1791:
1763:
1750:
1568:
1480:
1464:
1458:
1452:
1445:
1429:
1423:
1417:
1410:
1401:
1379:
1373:
1367:
1360:
1346:
1332:
1314:
1308:
1302:
1295:
1262:
1256:
1250:
1243:
1231:
1215:
1209:
1203:
1196:
1192:
1170:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1113:
663:Trinidad/Tobago
540:Trinidad/Tobago
470:
436:
431:
429:
390:
387:
384:
381:
380:
352:
347:
345:
325:
319:
290:High-importance
273:
270:
267:
265:Beauty Pageants
264:
263:
256:beauty pageants
231:High‑importance
230:
228:Beauty Pageants
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1975:
1973:
1965:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1919:
1918:
1895:
1894:
1887:
1840:
1839:
1831:Added archive
1809:
1806:
1800:
1797:
1790:
1789:Miss Iraq 2006
1787:
1749:
1746:
1729:
1728:
1712:PageantUpdater
1654:
1652:
1651:
1635:PageantUpdater
1603:
1567:
1562:
1530:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1446:PageantUpdater
1411:PageantUpdater
1400:
1397:
1361:PageantUpdater
1345:
1342:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1296:PageantUpdater
1244:PageantUpdater
1230:
1227:
1197:PageantUpdater
1191:
1188:
1169:
1166:
1112:
1109:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1087:
1084:
1078:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1062:Dominican Rep.
1060:
1054:
1051:
1045:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1002:
996:
993:
992:Dominican Rep.
990:
984:
981:
978:
972:
966:
958:
957:
956:
953:
950:
947:
944:
938:
937:
928:
920:
919:
913:
912:
901:
900:
899:
898:
892:
889:
886:
880:
877:
874:
871:
868:
865:
859:
856:
853:
847:
841:
836:
835:
834:
831:
828:
825:
822:
816:
815:
814:
813:
807:
801:
795:
792:
789:
786:
780:
777:
771:
766:
765:
764:
761:
758:
755:
752:
746:
745:
736:
728:
727:
721:
720:
709:
708:
707:
706:
703:
697:
691:
685:
682:
679:
673:
670:
664:
661:
655:
649:
646:
643:
637:
631:
628:
625:
619:
614:
613:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
585:
579:
578:
577:
576:
573:
567:
561:
558:
555:
552:
549:
543:
537:
529:
528:
527:
524:
521:
518:
515:
509:
508:
499:
491:
490:
484:
483:
469:
466:
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
451:Low-importance
442:
441:
425:
415:
414:
407:Low-importance
403:
397:
396:
394:
377:the discussion
358:
357:
341:
329:
328:
326:Low‑importance
314:
302:
301:
298:
297:
286:
280:
279:
277:
260:the discussion
246:
234:
233:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1974:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1924:
1922:
1915:
1914:
1909:
1904:
1903:
1892:
1888:
1885:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1872:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1848:
1843:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1813:
1807:
1805:
1798:
1796:
1795:
1788:
1786:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1760:
1756:
1747:
1745:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1727:
1724:
1723:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1681:
1675:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1656:
1650:
1647:
1646:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1630:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1608:
1601:
1599:
1595:
1590:
1588:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1573:
1566:
1563:
1561:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1538:
1537:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1483:
1477:
1471:
1467:
1461:
1455:
1448:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1432:
1426:
1420:
1413:
1407:
1398:
1396:
1395:
1392:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1376:
1370:
1363:
1355:
1354:
1351:
1343:
1341:
1340:
1337:
1329:
1321:
1317:
1311:
1305:
1298:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1265:
1259:
1253:
1246:
1240:
1236:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1212:
1206:
1199:
1189:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1167:
1165:
1133:
1118:
1110:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1064:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1003:
1000:
997:
994:
991:
988:
985:
982:
979:
976:
973:
970:
967:
964:
961:
960:
959:
954:
951:
948:
945:
942:
941:
940:
939:
936:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
923:
918:
915:
914:
910:
909:
905:
904:
896:
893:
890:
887:
884:
881:
878:
875:
872:
869:
866:
863:
860:
857:
854:
851:
848:
845:
842:
839:
838:
837:
832:
829:
826:
823:
820:
819:
818:
817:
811:
808:
805:
802:
799:
796:
793:
790:
787:
784:
781:
778:
775:
772:
769:
768:
767:
762:
759:
756:
753:
750:
749:
748:
747:
744:
742:
740:
737:
735:
732:
731:
726:
723:
722:
718:
717:
713:
712:
704:
701:
698:
695:
692:
689:
686:
683:
680:
677:
674:
671:
668:
665:
662:
659:
656:
653:
650:
647:
644:
641:
638:
635:
632:
629:
626:
623:
620:
617:
616:
615:
610:
607:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
589:
586:
583:
582:
581:
580:
574:
571:
568:
565:
562:
559:
556:
553:
550:
547:
544:
541:
538:
535:
532:
531:
530:
525:
522:
519:
516:
513:
512:
511:
510:
507:
505:
503:
500:
498:
495:
494:
489:
486:
485:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
467:
452:
449:(assessed as
448:
447:
439:
428:
421:
417:
416:
412:
408:
402:
399:
398:
395:
378:
374:
373:
368:
364:
363:
355:
344:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
323:
318:
315:
312:
308:
295:
291:
285:
282:
281:
278:
261:
257:
253:
252:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1899:
1896:
1871:source check
1850:
1844:
1841:
1814:
1811:
1802:
1792:
1751:
1733:
1730:
1710:
1709:
1701:
1685:
1676:
1657:
1653:
1633:
1632:
1611:
1602:
1591:
1584:
1569:
1564:
1549:
1546:
1539:
1535:
1533:
1532:
1529:
1514:
1501:
1496:
1493:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1481:
1402:
1388:
1356:
1347:
1333:
1232:
1224:
1193:
1177:
1171:
1114:
1096:
1080:
1074:
1056:
1048:South Africa
1047:
1041:
998:
986:
974:
968:
962:
906:
894:
882:
861:
849:
843:
809:
803:
797:
782:
773:
714:
699:
693:
687:
675:
666:
657:
651:
639:
633:
621:
569:
563:
545:
539:
533:
477:
471:
444:
406:
370:
360:
289:
249:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1764:—Preceding
1592:The source
1168:Predictions
627:Switzerland
618:Puerto Rico
560:Switzerland
554:Puerto Rico
322:Los Angeles
148:free images
31:not a forum
1921:Categories
1908:Report bug
1391:Elmer92413
1081:Czech Rep.
382:California
372:California
367:U.S. state
317:California
1891:this tool
1884:this tool
1735:Nfirm1295
1687:Nfirm1295
1613:Nfirm1295
1536:VANDALISM
1465:esperanza
1430:esperanza
1380:esperanza
1315:esperanza
1263:esperanza
1216:esperanza
1053:Australia
1032:Venezuela
1004:Venezuela
969:Australia
895:Czech Rep
855:Nicaragua
840:Venezuela
804:Nicaragua
788:Venezuela
694:Argentina
624:(mistake)
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1897:Cheers.—
1778:contribs
1766:unsigned
1720:contribs
1643:contribs
1459:contribs
1424:contribs
1374:contribs
1309:contribs
1257:contribs
1210:contribs
1068:Colombia
983:Colombia
888:Tanzania
862:Slovenia
844:Thailand
798:Tanzania
684:Paraguay
667:Thailand
634:Ethiopia
630:Colombia
575:Paraguay
570:Colombia
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1821:my edit
1275:Brian G
1182:Brian G
1075:Hungary
1042:Vietnam
883:Ukraine
850:Denmark
700:Ukraine
676:Hungary
672:Bolivia
622:Denmark
546:Bolivia
409:on the
292:on the
199:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1551:MUCfan
1503:MUCfan
1336:Hydman
1330:useful
1285:Joey80
1071:Russia
1038:Mexico
1035:Kosovo
995:Russia
980:Mexico
963:Kosovo
876:Mexico
870:Brazil
858:Angola
810:Mexico
783:Angola
770:Brazil
705:Mexico
658:Sweden
652:Brazil
645:Canada
640:Russia
564:Mexico
534:Canada
205:scale.
126:Google
1770:Fra77
1755:Fra77
1706:WP:OR
1350:Live!
1178:cited
1119:. --
1089:Spain
1083:(5th)
1077:(4th)
1065:Italy
1059:(3rd)
1057:Japan
1050:(2nd)
1044:(1st)
1001:(5th)
999:Italy
989:(4th)
977:(3rd)
975:Spain
971:(2nd)
965:(1st)
897:(5th)
891:Korea
885:(4th)
879:Japan
873:India
864:(3rd)
852:(2nd)
846:(1st)
812:(5th)
806:(4th)
800:(3rd)
794:Korea
785:(2nd)
779:Japan
776:(1st)
774:India
702:(9th)
696:(8th)
690:(7th)
688:India
678:(6th)
669:(5th)
660:(4th)
654:(3rd)
648:Japan
642:(2nd)
636:(1st)
572:(5th)
566:(4th)
551:Japan
548:(3rd)
542:(2nd)
536:(1st)
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1774:talk
1759:talk
1739:talk
1716:talk
1691:talk
1639:talk
1617:talk
1579:and
1555:talk
1522:talk
1507:talk
1453:talk
1418:talk
1368:talk
1303:talk
1251:talk
1237:and
1204:talk
1102:talk
284:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1865:RfC
1835:to
1702:why
1674:).
1086:USA
987:USA
867:USA
791:USA
681:USA
557:USA
401:Low
369:of
176:TWL
1923::
1878:.
1873:}}
1869:{{
1780:)
1776:•
1741:)
1718:•
1693:)
1641:•
1619:)
1557:)
1524:)
1509:)
1462:|
1456:|
1449:•
1427:|
1421:|
1414:•
1377:|
1371:|
1364:•
1312:|
1306:|
1299:•
1260:|
1254:|
1247:•
1213:|
1207:|
1200:•
1104:)
453:).
320::
156:)
54:;
1910:)
1906:(
1893:.
1886:.
1772:(
1757:(
1737:(
1689:(
1615:(
1553:(
1520:(
1505:(
1162:r
1159:e
1156:t
1153:a
1150:d
1147:p
1144:U
1141:t
1138:n
1135:a
1131:e
1127:g
1124:a
1121:P
1100:(
911::
719::
482::
413:.
296:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
