Talk:Murder of Lee Rigby/Archive 6

838:. While I understand from this that it may not be desirable to name Royal Barnes' wife (though she is named in both the citations now given), I cannot see what is gained by obscuring (to all those readers who don't take the time to look at the actual citations) who Royal Barnes is and what he has done: i.e. he was also a member of the Sharia patrols in London, and had immediately before the YouTube conviction been convicted of threatening members of the public as a member of that patrol. Surely it is relevant to spell out the nature of Royal's activities, given his conviction. Or is there some higher consideration I've overlooked? 2912:

to reflect what the sourcing says. All along, I have been trying to say that Rigby was not stabbed to kill or disable him, like the recent attacks in London. He might well have died from being hit by the car and the attackers primarily wanted to decapitate him; the eyewitnesses at the trial were clear about this. Anyway, I've had my two cents' worth and would welcome comments from other editors to prevent us from going round in circles on this.--

31: 903:. I think it is only right to give at least some of this context, and if you feel we shouldn't name them then I propose including some information about their activity given by both the citations: "On 14 March 2014, a married couple from London - who pleaded guilty of disseminating a terrorist publication - were jailed for posting videos on YouTube which condoned the death of Lee Rigby, with one video describing it as a "brilliant day"." 2230:

unacceptability. It is certainly true that this was murder according to the British state, and that should be reflected in the article. It should not be described as such in the title, where the context of that judgement cannot be reasonably conveyed. Much like the article I previously mentioned, 'death of...' or 'killing of...'would be far more appropriate. That would be an objective description of the event without implict judgement.

275:

murdered to be marked in perpetuity by a memorial as this would be a continuing reminder of the brutal murder and might attract undesirable interest from extremists. It is worth remembering that the memorial to Stephen Lawrence, the teenager murdered during a racist attack in South East London in 1993 has sadly been the victim of unwanted focus and vandalism on a number of occasions."

826:

random couple who were simply being foolish like the student mentioned in the previous sentence (who is named). I tried to make clear that this was of a rather different order by giving what I believe to be pertinent detail, as follows: "On 14 March 2014, 23-year old Royal Barnes, who had previously been convicted for threatening members of the public while taking part in

129:. If nothing else shows up i think those should be sufficient proof but i guess we can wait a week or two. As for the Woolwich memorial, well that has so much coverage that now CRYSTAL becomes irrelevant because the controversy and campaign is of significance itself, and i don't' think I implied it had actaully been built, therefore I intend to restore that material.-- 2938:. I had assumed that as the editor who had had the largest number of edits on this page, you knew the details of the incident, and responded accordingly. My comment makes less sense in light of your changed edit. This is why we have a rule against doing what you did. Now you know, you can folow the instructions and properly mark the change you made. 862:, so it is not an attempt to hide the names. Royal Barnes was jailed for five years and four months, and Rebekah Dawson was jailed for 20 months. This implies that the court considered Barnes to be the more guilty of the two. It is a conundrum whether to name both or neither. Incidentally, I also wonder whether Deyka Ayan Hassan 2993:. It could be argued that the murder of Lee Rigby fits in with the general pattern of the use of knives as easy to obtain low tech weapons, but the death of Rigby was not a stabbing attack, as virtually the entire use of the knife and cleaver was an attempt to decapitate him, and he was already unconscious at the time.-- 2984:

This is in line with eyewitness accounts of the event. The attackers seem to have been obsessed with decapitating Rigby, and nearly succeeded. I suspect that they wanted to parade around the street holding his severed head, in the style of an Islamic extremist propaganda video. None of this is really

2956:

I don't think it makes a great deal of difference to the thrust of the argument and clarifies the wording, but I've pointed out that it was changed. From the accounts given by the eyewitnesses, Rigby was not killed in a stabbing attack. He was run down with a car and knocked unconscious, and then the

2911:

which says "Like a "butcher attacking a joint of meat", Michael Adebolajo, 28, and Michael Adebowale, 22, then set about the unconscious man with a cleaver and knives in a "serious and almost successful" attempt to saw off his head, Richard Whittam QC, prosecuting, told the jury." I was simply trying

2541:

The very first link in the "See Also" section links to Udham Singh, an Indian freedom fighter who assasinated a British Governor for authorising Jallianwala Bagh massacre. I do not think this link is relevant since it is over 70 years old, not related to Islamic terrorism and there are plenty of more

2267:

Given your argument, I trust you'll be lobbying hard for the Bin Laden death article to also be renamed in such a manner? I'm joking, of course, I don't think there's a high chance at all that you'd apply your logic consistently when it risks undermining your politically dominant narrative. Thank you

2096:

I bring to your attention the article I previously provided as an example. Much like Lee Rigby, Bin Laden was killed illegally as considered by the state he was in. Much like Lee Rigby, its legitimacy was contested amongst different groups and powers. Why then is the belief of one set of powers taken

1317:

The point is about how due it would be to name him, as a) it is a tangential detail to the murder of Lee Rigby and b) he did not commit any of the crimes that he was being set up to do. If there was an article on this individual case (there should be if the perpetrator is given a heavy jail sentence)

574:

The lack of mentions of Shomrim in the context of the Lee Rigby case by a range of mainstream reliable sources (BBC, CNN, Telegraph, Guardian etc) is the real worry. It is possible to find mentions of anything on the web if you look hard enough, but a Knowledge article needs to give due weight to the

2980:

This isn't in the article because it doesn't add much context and is somewhat overdetailed. Pretty much anyone can go out and buy a kitchen knife set without questions being asked, which is why knives make an ideal low-tech weapon for Islamic extremists. The Home Office pathologist described Rigby's

2600:

King's Arms - Woolwich pub, site of IRA-bombing in 1974 Why is this link the second when there are plenty of other relevant, new and religiosly related attacks to list. The edit was reverted saying that the order is "alphabetical". I don't know which alphabet that particular editor was talking about

2400:

Program air date 27 Sep 2016. Available on iPlayer 22 days. Video coverage of Paramedic crew enroute to crime scene and transporting a 22 year old suspect with leg wound from gunshot. A police officer riding along chats with suspect when they recognize that they both had attended school together. An

2213:

is "The unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the King (or Queen's) peace with malice aforethought express or implied". Since the killers deliberately set out to kill somebody that day, admitted to their crime in its immediate aftermath, and due to the overwhelming evidence that was

3057:

is a far left group and using them for statistics regarding "anti Muslim backlash" is beyond laughable. This whole article reads like an apology for Islam and its core beliefs. In other words, this article is massively biased and not impartial. Articles are meant to stick to the facts, not push an

2769:

says "The savagery of the murder, in which Rigby, 25, was repeatedly stabbed and hacked at the neck by a cleaver, shattered community relations when mosques were attacked." Evidence presented at the trial from eyewitnesses said that the primary purpose of the knife and cleaver attack was an attempt

2596:

1. Why is this the first link in the "SEE ALSO" section 2. Why does the text mention "Sikh" even though the killing was not religiously motivated. Do you mention the religion of every person in all other sections as the very first thing. 3. Going by your logic, should we include Jallianwala Bagh

2154:

Your concern of whether the act was "brave" or "big" is telling. Nobody mentioned anything about that, these are concerns of judgement coming from your own mind. Your thoughts on what is and isn't appropriate for this article are clearly influenced very much by a value-laden partisan judgement, and

917:

Barnes knew Michael Adebowale, so he was not a complete outsider. Barnes pleaded guilty to inciting murder in a post on Facebook, which his wife did not, which is probably the reason for the longer sentence. Deyka Ayan Hassan's name should definitely be removed because it was a foot in mouth tweet.

2477:

Yes, the program is about the London Ambulance service. They build an entire storyline about arriving at the murder scene, placing a suspect in the van, and show a revealing conversation between the suspect and a medic in the van who knew each other in school. It is hardly tangential to the murder

2175:

I really can't understand what you are getting at here. Britain is not perfect, but people do not have the right to go around the streets killing unarmed people and saying that this is acceptable for a political or religious cause. I also resent the suggestion that believing this makes me "clearly

1713:

I was 50-50 about adding this, because it is pretty much routine for people to say that events such as 9/11 were a hoax (which Spivey also does). This is not illegal in itself, but Spivey was convicted of harassing the Rigby family by accusing them of being in on the hoax and publishing their home

1187:

I disagree that there would be appropriate sources on the above. The language used in the screeds of the murderers suggested that they saw Islam as one united community, rather than for example supporting black Somalians (who incidentally, seem to have their disputes with the equally black Kenyans

898:

The student Deyka Ayan Hassan, mentioned in the previous sentence, was sentenced for a lesser crime to 250 hours of unpaid work, and is named. So yes, I rather think that if we don't name Barnes and his wife, then we shouldn't name her. But I do feel that missing out all detail about Barnes, only

2092:

Those arguments make the assumption that rulings of the British state constitute objective truth. I wonder how many articles you might feel fit to insert non-neutral language into based on the rulings of the north korean justice system. Please think about that; if you find yourself applying that

1059:

Rigby's father is entitled to his opinion, but when a person qualifies for legal aid it makes no difference what they have done or what the verdict at the trial turns out to be. Rigby's father said "There wasn't even a defence – they were on camera boasting about killing Lee. The system needs to

794:

Which says "While the term is widely recognized and used, both the term and the underlying concept have been criticized." Some people do not like the word because of its pseudo-medical connotations (Doctor, I'm suffering from Islamophobia, is there a pill for it?) What is being described here is

3031:

I would argue that having an aftermath or subsequent events section on a page concerning a murder is nothing new, and is justified in this case due to the existence of several (~30) sources in this section detailing further events such as a Parliamentary inquiry, the response of the Ministry of

1063:

What he appears to be saying is that entitlement to legal aid should take into account the likely verdict before deciding on whether to award it, a change that is unlikely to happen. Other media sources noted the legal aid costs in the case, but did not comment on whether they were justified or

825:

There is a sentence in "Subsequent events" which reads: "On 14 March 2014, a married couple from London were jailed for posting videos on YouTube which condoned the death of Lee Rigby, with one video describing it as a "brilliant day"." This seems hopelessly bland, rather implying that it was a

274:

I'm in the process of re-adding it. It was misleading because it may have given the impression that Greenwich Council and Nick Raynsford said an outright no to the idea of a memorial when they did not. Raynsford's concern was "It would not in my view be helpful for the site where Lee Rigby was

2229:

There has been no argument made to state this attack was acceptable. That would be a subjective judgement unfit for an encyclopedia. Similarily, labelling it as unacceptable would be a subjective judgement unfit for an encyclopedia. The 'murder' label conveys that subjective judgement of

2126:

because it is beyond the scope of this talk page. Lee Rigby was an unarmed off duty soldier who was killed on a London street and his two killers were convicted of murder by a jury. Regardless of the political or religious circumstances involved, I don't call that a brave or big thing to

2981:

wounds as "fractures to his back that could have been caused when he was driven into by a car at the start of the attack and "numerous and very deep" wounds to his neck, some of which it would have taken "severe force" to inflict. He gave the cause of death as "multiple incised wounds".

2150:

Nor do I ask you to, nor would it would be appropriate to. Just like it isn't appropriate to pass judgement on this killing by applying a non-NPOV label of another kind. You are quite right that this is soapbox territory, this article's use of a loaded term is pushing an agenda.

2155:

you are of course part of a huge majority in this way. I always find it funny how modern western discourse assumes for itself the impartiality that it, quite rightly, finds lacking elsewhere. Please try to detach yourself for a moment and consider- what will history make of it?

1172:

Perhaps the "race" (or ethnic origin) of the two murderers might be relevant in an analysis of why they decided to espouse that distorted version of Islam in the first place. But the article is about the murder of Rigby, not about the lives of those two individuals themselves.

2796::::::*(Changing your comment - especially a significant change - after a fellow editor has responded is regarded as a kind of dirty pool. you probably weren't aware, but do not do it again. If you want to make a change, yo must clearly mark the fact that you are doing so.) 2425:

Could you be a bit more specific about why it involves the murder of Lee Rigby? It is an hour long documentary about the London ambulance service, but I haven't really got the time to watch it all. Also, iPlayer videos are not an ideal source as they usually expire after a

2285:

I'd like to know a bit more about the person saying this, as there is a huge amount of axe grinding going on here. If a person is found guilty of murder by a British court and this is reported by reliable sources, the title of the article will be "Murder of", in line with

2021:

It does not seem appropriate to describe this incident as a 'murder'. Considering the motivations of the attackers, the identity of the victim, and the political context of the action, we have to understand this event as something beyond a mere crime in the British state.

2031:

I feel such bias is not suprising, with most of our media and contributing user base drawn from the west (NATO-aligned west in particular) and with this being in huge conflict with violent islamism. Nonetheless, it is unacceptable for an enyclopedia to reflect such bias.

2483:

Regarding the availability of programing on the BBC iPlayer that "expires". Broadcasts are archived in a variety of places besides iPlayer. A statement that video was captured of an incident by a broadcast network/program is valuable to an investigator searching source

345:(which I can't get to work at the moment) is not from the mainstream media. Overall, this doesn't seem to have the due weight required for its own paragraph. It also appears to have been added by a single purpose account which may have a conflict of interest here. 2351:

Agreed, because the talk page of individual articles isn't the place to debate Knowledge policy as a whole. Knowledge articles are not social sciences essays where personal analysis is part of the game. Articles are limited to what reliable sources have said.

173:

Well the outcome is quite recent and no doubt things would need to be tweaked once the memorial is built, but the controversy/campaign are clearly of note, and in addition to the various sources there's a lot of radio coverage and even the backing of

1484:

If it is copyrighted in any way, eg if Henry Szymanski claims a copyright on it, then the image cannot be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Please could you be a bit more specific about the licencing requirements for using this image. See also

220:

is too long and newsy in style. There needs to be a long term perspective about what will be notable in twelve months' time. Also, as far as I can see from the sourcing, Boris Johnson did not have a change of heart as he never opposed the

1132:

not say that he was white? Possibly because it isn't relevant. The killers appear to have been motivated by political/religious extremism rather than by race - though the article does state that they are British of Nigerian descent.

2247:

You can whitter on with your sophistry to your heart's content. This was a crime in the jurisdiction in which it happened, determined by a jury in a properly constituted court of law to be murder, and will remain described as such.

2100:

There is no consistency in thr argument that you are applying. It displays bias. My argument is not borne of 'original research', but of seeking to consistently apply a NPOV to this encyclopedia, as is its purported intention.

178:. I'm very much in favour of making the text as concise as possible, but the campaign and the opposition to the memorial need inclusion, they're actually much more significant than any material on the Armed Services memorial-- 1511:

Thanks, The photograph is not available for use under the OGL, the copyright is owned by Mr Henry Szymanski and only he may licence it. It seems that the image cannot be hosted on Wikimedia Commons so what is the next

1044:

I do think that what I had written about Rigby's father's opinion on this should be included. It's neither right nor wrong, but adds to why we include this figure - a relative of the deceased was highly critical of it.

251:

section: "In June 2014, plans were announced to add Rigby's name to the Armed Forces Memorial in Staffordshire, and for a memorial in Woolwich." 23 words seems too little and I think it may also be in the wrong place?

1838:

It will be in St George's Garrison Church in Woolwich, rather than at the scene of the incident, which was rejected by Greenwich Council because of fears that it would become a focal point for Islamist and far right

2454:

One of the crew in the ambulance describes how he attended the Lee Rigby attack, and thought that it was a gang incident until he saw it on Sky News. It is fairly tangential and not really worth mentioning in the

1779:

should be added, or whether it was enough on topic. Zack Davies seems like a wacky person who might have done something like this anyway. Also, it occurred well after the killing of Lee Rigby. Should this be

1957: 3027:

Recently there has been some section blanking of the 'Subsequent events' part of this page. In the edit summaries of those blanks, the complaint has come up that this section is biased and/or irrelevant.

1022:

Some of the criticism misses the point, because the costs of a high profile trial at the Old Bailey would be into six figures, and a person is entitled to a fair trial regardless of what they have done.--

2263:

There has been no doubt from the start that it will remain titled as such. It will be the long course of history that breaks the hegemonic control of knowledge, not my wikipedia postings. I merely help.

2049:

They were found guilty of murder by a jury in December 2013. It is the job of the article to reflect what reliable sources have said, not what they should have said according to personal analysis or

1918: 1061: 754:

In the section 'anti-muslim backlash', anti-muslim attacks are described as "islamophbia", which is clearly not NPOV at all. It should be called what it is in the heading, anti-muslim.

388: 536:

Your last source was largely irrelevant to this article, so I have removed it. I don't think that consensus has yet been positively established on the value of this paragraph. Thanks.

2770:

to decapitate Rigby. They had no need to stab him as he was already unconscious (originally I said disabled here) and lying on the ground after being hit by the car at 30 - 40mph.--

1866:

The gun was a rusty "cowboy gun" from the 1920s and incapable of firing. (That this was the only gun they could get testifies to the effectiveness of regulation on Great Britain.)

860: 1234:

because it is not directly related to the Lee Rigby case. Nonetheless, the sourcing is clear that he was inspired by the murder of Lee Rigby and wanted to do something similar.--

502:

Just added another link to a vice.com article that explains Shomrim in more depth, and also makes reference to the good relationship between Shomrim and the Muslim community. --

1303:

Kazi Isla's friend, Harry Thomas, was interviewed, but without showing has face, on the BBC Six O'clock news this evening. So I'm not sure he shouldn't be named in the article.

1917:

The OP is right. The gun has not received a great deal of attention because it was not used in the attack. It was "a rusty Dutch KNIL 9.4mm revolver that was 90-years-old."

1618: 1457:

Thanks, This is not a UK Crown Copyright photograph and is not available under the Open Government Licence meaning that the Photo has the incorrect copyright attribution.

2511:

issues because it is only a brief mention and doesn't really add to a reader's understanding of the attack. It could be left out without any significant loss of context.--

387:

Agree. Including this seems undue to me, and looks like boosterism for the Shomrim more than anything else. (an archived copy of the hackneyhive source can be found here

1803:

I changed my mind, because one of the witnesses at the trial heard Davies say: "Come here, this is for Lee Rigby." This suggests a direct rather than vague motivation.--

412:

now rests on the relative quality of the remaining two sources - Al Jazeera and the local hackneyhive.com. Other sources here are UK mainstream newspapers. Not sure.

1318:

we would definitely name this attempted patsy. But here, there is no gain in naming him, but somewhat more to be gained by naming the criminal who was grooming him.

3081: 2590:

Ok so I can't believe this is still here and my edit was reverted. So Knowledge editors, please try to answer this question using LOGIC and not your hidden agendas

2908: 2704: 2743: 1425: 2322:

Hegemony is a well understood idea within social science, and narrative is an entirely non-contentious term to describe the recorded presentation of events.

1836: 1289:. This has ended up with a conviction at the Old Bailey, so it is hardly minor, but again as a tangential item should not have too much information on it. 2840:

and a stabbing/knife attack; and it was a murder, a beheading and a terrorist attack - and can probably be described from a number of additional angles.

958:, that his previous history is of great significance, otherwise it sounds like just a couple who did a stupid video rather than deliberately doing it. -- 716:

Tend to agree. Just because the murder is very signifiicant to the group, does not necessarily mean the group is significant to the story of the murder.

2337:

Yes, and the record shows that the murderers were found guilty of murder in a properly constituted court of law, hence we call this a "murder." End of.

1473: 1408: 1392:

has the incorrect copyright attribution and is not a UK Crown Copyright photograph and therefore is not available under the Open Government Licence.

1711: 1930:

The article could make this clearer, as thanks to the UK's stringent gun laws, the attackers were unable to find a real gun, only an antique.--

994:

attempting to say "If you have committed a sickening crime, you should not have legal aid?" This is a tabloid attempt to whip up controversy.--

371:

Quite agree. A secondary source, which shows a direct link between Shomrim and the Muslim community in these circumstances, would be required.

342: 2381:"Murder of Lee Rigby" doesn't tell the whole story, not at all. But I don't really know what else we can call it, so I think it has to stay. 1150:

is the wording in the article. Lee Rigby was killed because they were following a distorted version of Islam, not because they were black.--

127: 3065: 2323: 2271: 2233: 2161: 2104: 2035: 575:

mainstream sources. Also, if VarifiedEditor has any affiliation with Shomrim, it would be best not to make article edits involving it, per

124: 2608: 2549: 1888: 1432:

shows, which is why the uploader concluded that it had an Open Government Licence. It is no longer on the page of the MOD press release.

761: 2597:

massacre as a "See Also" in Mumbai Terror Attacks since in both cases the victims were Indians and both were perpetrated by foreigners

1526:

It cannot be hosted on Wikimedia Commons unless Henry Szymanski releases the copyright. It could be used in a Knowledge article with a

2762: 691: 72: 67: 59: 408:

Have removed cite to Shomrim website as seemed to be redundant, as well as being still "under construction." I guess the question of

694:

has its own Knowledge article where the Lee Rigby link can be mentioned, but it probably isn't notable enough for a mention here.--

2934:

It's not that I didn't "like" your comment. It's that I had assumed that as an editor with long experience you would be aware of

276: 1588:

I had a think about whether to bring back the image with a fair use tag. Since the image is already available in the article via

1715: 641:

are major news channels both in the UK and worldwide. This was also covered in the local Hackney Gazett, which is part of the

2986: 2966: 2865: 2386: 834:

which condoned the death of Lee Rigby, with one video describing it as a "brilliant day"." This was reverted on the basis of

2025:

Take the following article for example, which is not offering the same blatant partisan judgement in its use of language.

1517: 1469: 1404: 1323: 1294: 1193: 1050: 1651: 2957:

knife and cleaver were used in an attempt to decapitate him. This is significantly different from what happened in the

2268:

for discussion, I'm glad I was able to help shine light on these increasingly scrutinised biases. History rolls forth.

1202:

I'm not claiming there would be sources to support that contention. My point was it's not the subject of this article.

2740: 2494: 2408: 2077:

Tough. The murderers were convicted of murder in a properly constituted court of law for murdering Lee Rigby. End of.

1956:

When armed police arrived at the scene, Adebowale pointed the gun at officers, who opened fire and shot off his thumb.

1900:

Could you provide the full link to The Sun article? (not that it could be used as a source for the article). Thanks.

1963:. At the time, armed police officers would not have known that it was not a real (ie capable of being fired) gun.-- 1433: 990:

really necessary? The bottom line is that when a person lacks sufficient funds, they will be granted legal aid. Is

123:

Well I suppose you're technically correct on the first issue, though this source suggests his name is now included

38: 2382: 247:

I tried to trim what was added, but it has now been completely removed. The article again just says this, in the

2327: 2275: 2237: 2165: 2123: 2108: 2039: 1905: 1671: 1337: 1319: 1308: 1290: 1262: 1207: 1189: 1178: 1116: 1046: 963: 785: 721: 650: 541: 507: 475: 445: 417: 376: 313: 257: 47: 17: 3069: 1513: 1465: 1400: 1018: 645:(media group), this was also featured in many other worldwide channels who quoted those original articles. -- 3084:. As for the claim that the entire article is biased, this is unimpressive unless specific points are made.-- 2612: 2553: 2962: 2958: 2711: 2707: 1884: 827: 765: 431: 183: 134: 2703:: Rigby was knocked down by the car, and the attackers then attempted to decapitate him, nearly succeeding. 3040: 2837: 2490: 2420: 2404: 2219: 1138: 395: 206: 2542:

relevant and applicable links which deal with Islamic terrorism in Britain and in London are available.

1928: 959: 853:

The two people involved in the YouTube incident are not major players in the death of Lee Rigby and fail

646: 503: 471: 2943: 2890: 2873: 2845: 2823: 2801: 2750: 2667:

but I agree with 123.237.77.33 that it is somewhat tangential here. The article could live without it.--

2342: 2253: 2206: 2082: 1880: 1101: 945: 908: 843: 93: 1257:

I think it fairly belongs in the Reactions section. This was part of the sworn evidence at his trial.

1097: 3061: 2604: 2545: 2402: 2290:. Phrases like "hegemonic control" and "narrative" are straight from the vocabulary of Dave Spart in 1876: 1556:

from Wikimedia Commons. Now the image may need to be uploaded to Knowledge with a fair use licence.--

1461: 1396: 757: 2401:

editor familiar with topic may want to add the program and some details from video to this article.

1870: 3080:

There was undoubtedly a rise in hate incidents following Rigby's death and there is another source

2868:(which includes a list of Islamism-related attacks with blade weapons) to the "See also" section. 2214:

presented against them at their trial, they were convicted of murder. What else would you call it?

1901: 1667: 1333: 1304: 1258: 1203: 1174: 1112: 781: 717: 634: 537: 441: 413: 372: 309: 253: 148: 2935: 2287: 2200: 1655: 1276: 893: 427: 198: 179: 130: 1776: 1923:. Nor could it fire, as it was considered to be "antique/obsolete calibre" and exempt from the 3036: 2215: 2119: 1924: 1134: 900: 866: 854: 835: 440:

A third source, fro Huff Po, has now been added. But no input here from the editor concerned.

391: 346: 202: 100:

as they have not happened yet. The article should be updated when there is more information.--

97: 2970: 2939: 2886: 2869: 2841: 2819: 2797: 2746: 2654: 2356:

or otherwise, BBC News says that Lee Rigby was murdered, so that is what the article says.--

2338: 2249: 2078: 1424:

and is credited to Henry Szymanski. What should its licence be? The image was originally on

1271:

I can't see why it's not relevant, but it should probably not take up more than a sentence.

1147: 955: 941: 904: 839: 3135: 3115: 3101: 3073: 3044: 3010: 2947: 2929: 2894: 2877: 2849: 2827: 2805: 2787: 2754: 2731: 2684: 2658: 2644: 2616: 2584: 2557: 2528: 2498: 2489:

What is really "not worth mentioning" to one reader is of consequential benefit to another.

2472: 2443: 2412: 2390: 2373: 2346: 2331: 2316: 2279: 2257: 2241: 2223: 2193: 2169: 2144: 2112: 2086: 2070: 2043: 2011: 1980: 1947: 1909: 1892: 1856: 1820: 1797: 1764: 1734: 1697: 1675: 1660: 1642: 1609: 1573: 1547: 1521: 1506: 1477: 1452: 1412: 1378: 1341: 1327: 1312: 1298: 1280: 1266: 1251: 1211: 1197: 1182: 1167: 1142: 1120: 1105: 1081: 1054: 1039: 1011: 967: 949: 935: 912: 886: 847: 812: 789: 769: 725: 711: 654: 596: 545: 511: 479: 449: 435: 421: 399: 380: 365: 317: 299: 261: 238: 210: 187: 168: 138: 117: 2508: 1429: 638: 409: 1188:

and Ethiopians rather than the West). Unless I'm reading you wrong, I can't see a link.

863: 858: 279: 2649:

Someone apparently very much wants this to be included. Could this person explain why?

1744: 1741: 1527: 1129: 305: 1553: 1389: 147:

The part about the controversy was trimmed because it seemed to be excessive and have

3054: 2882: 2836:

I'm not disputing that. But an attack can have multiple modalities. This one was a

1272: 576: 175: 1717:

Spivey is due to be sentenced on 27 August. Spivey's website is currently offline.--

470:

Hi. I'm fairly new to Knowledge, I hope you are now satisfied with all the sources.

3121: 3087: 2996: 2915: 2773: 2717: 2670: 2630: 2570: 2514: 2458: 2429: 2359: 2302: 2179: 2130: 2056: 2050: 1997: 1966: 1933: 1842: 1806: 1783: 1750: 1720: 1683: 1628: 1595: 1559: 1533: 1492: 1438: 1364: 1237: 1153: 1067: 1025: 997: 921: 872: 798: 777: 697: 582: 351: 285: 224: 154: 103: 2297: 282:, Greenwich Council said that the Army had not requested a memorial in Woolwich.-- 3032:

Defense, and a few other controversies that stemmed directly from this incident.

899:

identifying him as part of a couple which posted certain YouTube clips, presents

3118:

is in the news today. However, it doesn't seem notable enough for the article.--

2650: 2624: 2564: 2292: 2210: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

201:

I think inclusion of the campaign and opposition are of interest and of value.

2026: 630: 339: 3109: 2977:

and bought a knife sharpener and five-piece knife block set, costing £44.98.

1486: 1421: 987: 2745:, and Rigby does appear to have died of kinfe and cleaver inflicted wounds. 2593:

Udham Singh - a Sikh who shot dead British soldier Michael O'Dwyer in 1940

2451: 341:

is a primary source and gives no detail about the Lee Rigby incident, and

2982: 2978: 2974: 2567:

may be rather tangential, so it could be removed. What do others think?--

2353: 1991: 1921: 1358: 1286: 1231: 1020: 2903:

I'm sorry if you didn't like me changing "disabled" to "unconscious" in

1017:

It is worth a brief mention because it received a good deal of coverage.

1589: 1096:

Why doesn't the article mention that the race of the murders was black?

831: 642: 857:

for this article in my view. They are named in the sourcing given at

1994:

is in the news today, but is it notable enough for a mention here?--

1835:

today, there will be a permanent memorial to Lee Rigby in Woolwich.

2885:

is a problem here. I suggest that we let other editors weigh in.

2860:

Readers coming to this discussion should understand that this is

1960: 1871:

http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/archive/01876/gun_1876532a.jpg

2864:

about changing the text of the article. I merely added adding

1666:

I think that one looks good enough to use as a lead image here.

830:, and his wife Rebekah Dawson were jailed for posting videos on 2158:

Reply if you please, but I shall leave you to those thoughts.

1625:

says that there has been a copyright dispute over the image.--

25: 308:

certainly puts the opposition into much clearer perspective.

2176:

influenced very much by a value-laden partisan judgement".--

1592:, it is no longer in the article as this seems sufficient.-- 1123:(... do you think the article should say Rigby was "white"?) 2969:. On the day before the attack, Michael Adebolajo went to 2478:

investigation to have video placed at this time and place.

2450:

OK, had a look and there is a 30 second edited video clip

1913:

And could you sign you posts, using four tildes, thanks.

918:

The wording suggested for Barnes and his wife looks OK.--

2093:

argument inconsistently, you have discovered your bias.

1590:

Tribute to Lee Rigby, Manchester Day Parade, 2 June 2013

126:

and this one shows his name drawn out ready to be added

2990: 2904: 2700: 2664: 1710:

Chris Spivey was convicted but not sentenced yesterday.

335: 217: 96:

and for a memorial in Woolwich both have an element of

304:

Oh, I see. Sorry, I did not realise. That quote from

1987:

Michael Adebolajo "suing over teeth lost in prison"

3035:If anyone else would like to discuss, feel free. 2739:It is pretty regularly described as a "stabbing" 2627:because the link is not clear cut in this case.-- 2027:https://en.wikipedia.org/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden 795:old-fashioned racial and religious prejudice.-- 426:I also agree that the material breaches UNDUE-- 1654:, that is definitely by an MoD photographer. — 1959:There is a high-res CCTV image of the moment 8: 3023:Subsequent events section: relevant? biased? 2714:. It's misleading to give this impression.-- 1361:. However, it is still at the trial stage.-- 821:Details on couple jailed for YouTube videos 3059: 2602: 2543: 1420:Thanks, the photo is on Wikimedia Commons 2761:Search engine results can be misleading. 2601:but it surely wasn't English alphabet. 2122:territory. I'm not going to discuss the 2706:This wasn't a stabbing attack like the 1530:. I have pointed this out on Commons.-- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1740:Spivey received a suspended sentence. 1650:Fyi, there's another photo of Rigby, 7: 1357:There is a new alleged copycat case 1287:another case of an attempted copycat 692:Shomrim (neighborhood watch group) ‎ 3108:Adebowale sentenced for attack at 1230:I was 50:50 on whether to include 24: 1680:Done, I've rejigged the images.-- 92:Plans to add Rigby's name to the 1743:I'm not sure if this has enough 1384:Photograph of Fusilier Lee Rigby 1111:So you think "black" is a race? 29: 2965:. The infobox here doesn't say 901:"a significant loss of context" 2987:Stabbing as a terrorist tactic 2967:Stabbing as a terrorist tactic 2907:. It is based on the sourcing 2866:Stabbing as a terrorist tactic 1857:07:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 1821:08:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 1798:07:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 1: 2012:07:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC) 1747:notability for the article.-- 1281:21:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 1267:21:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 1252:19:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 1183:12:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC) 1168:11:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC) 1143:10:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC) 1121:10:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC) 1106:09:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC) 3136:18:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 2985:consistent with the phrase " 2529:06:10, 1 November 2016 (UTC) 2499:03:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC) 1981:07:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC) 1948:06:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC) 1910:15:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 1893:14:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 1652:File:Drummer Lee Rigby 1.jpg 2473:16:09, 8 October 2016 (UTC) 2444:05:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 2413:03:10, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 1765:08:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC) 1148:British of Nigerian descent 1082:05:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC) 1055:19:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC) 1040:06:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 1012:05:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 968:20:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 950:09:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 936:09:48, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 913:09:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 887:08:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 848:08:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 3151: 2645:20:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 2617:19:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 2585:06:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC) 2558:17:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC) 2396:BBC "Ambulance" Episode 1" 2391:13:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC) 1735:06:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC) 1698:05:46, 1 August 2015 (UTC) 1487:Commons:Choosing a license 1342:22:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC) 1328:22:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC) 1313:19:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC) 1299:18:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC) 1212:19:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC) 1198:18:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC) 813:05:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 790:22:20, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 770:21:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 3102:08:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 3074:06:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC) 3045:15:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 3011:05:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC) 2374:15:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 2347:14:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 2332:11:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 2317:05:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC) 2280:22:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC) 2258:18:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC) 2242:15:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC) 2224:11:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC) 2194:11:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC) 2170:11:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC) 2145:05:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC) 2113:21:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC) 2087:20:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC) 2071:19:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC) 2044:19:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC) 1676:20:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1661:20:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1643:08:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1610:05:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC) 1574:18:36, 22 July 2015 (UTC) 1548:18:14, 22 July 2015 (UTC) 1522:15:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC) 1507:13:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 1478:13:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 1453:10:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 1413:08:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 1379:18:04, 21 July 2015 (UTC) 318:19:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 300:18:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 262:18:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 239:18:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 211:11:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 188:08:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 169:07:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 139:07:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 118:06:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 2948:21:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2930:19:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2895:18:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2878:17:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2850:17:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2828:17:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2806:18:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2788:17:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2755:17:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2732:17:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 2685:18:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC) 2659:16:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC) 2124:Death of Osama bin Laden 1128:Why does our article on 954:I personally agree with 940:Thanks for fixing this. 828:Sharia patrols in London 726:09:31, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 712:09:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 655:09:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 597:06:25, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 546:22:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 512:21:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 480:21:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 450:21:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 436:20:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 422:20:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 400:19:48, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 381:19:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 366:19:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 18:Talk:Murder of Lee Rigby 2963:June 2017 London attack 2959:2017 Westminster attack 2712:June 2017 London attack 2708:2017 Westminster attack 2097:as encyclopedic fact? 1285:I've put a sentence on 2838:Vehicle-ramming attack 986:Is the part about the 216:The material reverted 2989:" which was added in 2118:This is getting into 1226:Brusthom Ziamani case 1092:Race of the Murderers 94:Armed Forces Memorial 42:of past discussions. 2383:El cid, el campeador 2207:definition of murder 629:Fair point, however 2818:But he wasn't dead. 2695:Stabbing attack? No 2663:It was restored in 1920:and was not loaded. 1775:I wondered whether 1706:Conspiracy theorist 1552:The image has been 1514:UKMinistryofDefence 1466:UKMinistryofDefence 1401:UKMinistryofDefence 869:for this article.-- 635:The Huffington Post 280:this BBC News story 88:June 2014 memorials 1862:"armed with a gun" 1827:Lee Rigby memorial 1390:Fusilier Lee Rigby 1388:The Photograph of 3076: 3064:comment added by 2808: 2619: 2607:comment added by 2560: 2548:comment added by 2491:Kyle Andrew Brown 2421:Kyle Andrew Brown 2405:Kyle Andrew Brown 2204: 2051:original research 2017:murder - non NPOV 1925:Firearms Act 1968 1914: 1896: 1879:comment added by 1831:According to the 1481: 1464:comment added by 1416: 1399:comment added by 897: 760:comment added by 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3142: 3131: 3129: 3128: 3097: 3095: 3094: 3006: 3004: 3003: 2925: 2923: 2922: 2795: 2783: 2781: 2780: 2727: 2725: 2724: 2680: 2678: 2677: 2640: 2638: 2637: 2580: 2578: 2577: 2537:See Also Section 2524: 2522: 2521: 2468: 2466: 2465: 2439: 2437: 2436: 2424: 2369: 2367: 2366: 2312: 2310: 2309: 2198: 2189: 2187: 2186: 2140: 2138: 2137: 2066: 2064: 2063: 2007: 2005: 2004: 1976: 1974: 1973: 1943: 1941: 1940: 1912: 1895: 1873: 1852: 1850: 1849: 1816: 1814: 1813: 1793: 1791: 1790: 1760: 1758: 1757: 1730: 1728: 1727: 1693: 1691: 1690: 1638: 1636: 1635: 1605: 1603: 1602: 1569: 1567: 1566: 1554:speedily deleted 1543: 1541: 1540: 1528:fair use licence 1502: 1500: 1499: 1480: 1458: 1448: 1446: 1445: 1415: 1393: 1374: 1372: 1371: 1247: 1245: 1244: 1163: 1161: 1160: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1035: 1033: 1032: 1007: 1005: 1004: 931: 929: 928: 891: 882: 880: 879: 808: 806: 805: 772: 707: 705: 704: 592: 590: 589: 361: 359: 358: 295: 293: 292: 234: 232: 231: 164: 162: 161: 113: 111: 110: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3126: 3124: 3122: 3113: 3092: 3090: 3088: 3052: 3025: 3001: 2999: 2997: 2920: 2918: 2916: 2778: 2776: 2774: 2722: 2720: 2718: 2697: 2675: 2673: 2671: 2635: 2633: 2631: 2598: 2575: 2573: 2571: 2539: 2519: 2517: 2515: 2463: 2461: 2459: 2434: 2432: 2430: 2418: 2398: 2364: 2362: 2360: 2307: 2305: 2303: 2184: 2182: 2180: 2135: 2133: 2131: 2061: 2059: 2057: 2019: 2002: 2000: 1998: 1989: 1971: 1969: 1967: 1938: 1936: 1934: 1874: 1864: 1847: 1845: 1843: 1829: 1811: 1809: 1807: 1788: 1786: 1784: 1773: 1771:Attack in Wales 1755: 1753: 1751: 1725: 1723: 1721: 1708: 1688: 1686: 1684: 1633: 1631: 1629: 1600: 1598: 1596: 1564: 1562: 1560: 1538: 1536: 1534: 1497: 1495: 1493: 1459: 1443: 1441: 1439: 1430:Wayback Machine 1394: 1386: 1369: 1367: 1365: 1242: 1240: 1238: 1228: 1158: 1156: 1154: 1094: 1072: 1070: 1068: 1030: 1028: 1026: 1002: 1000: 998: 984: 926: 924: 922: 877: 875: 873: 823: 803: 801: 799: 755: 752: 702: 700: 698: 587: 585: 583: 356: 354: 352: 332: 290: 288: 286: 229: 227: 225: 159: 157: 155: 108: 106: 104: 90: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3148: 3146: 3112: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3066:109.180.91.225 3051: 3048: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 2951: 2950: 2898: 2897: 2880: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2758: 2757: 2696: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2595: 2588: 2587: 2538: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2502: 2501: 2486: 2485: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2447: 2446: 2397: 2394: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2324:81.107.247.220 2320: 2319: 2272:81.107.247.220 2261: 2260: 2234:81.107.247.220 2227: 2226: 2196: 2162:81.107.247.220 2148: 2147: 2105:81.107.247.220 2090: 2089: 2074: 2073: 2036:81.107.247.220 2018: 2015: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1902:Martinevans123 1869:Image of gun: 1863: 1860: 1828: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1772: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1668:Martinevans123 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1613: 1612: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1455: 1385: 1382: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1334:Martinevans123 1305:Martinevans123 1259:Martinevans123 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1204:Martinevans123 1175:Martinevans123 1130:Harold Shipman 1125: 1124: 1113:Martinevans123 1093: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 983: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 960:VarifiedEditor 822: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 782:Martinevans123 751: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 718:Martinevans123 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 647:VarifiedEditor 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 538:Martinevans123 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 504:VarifiedEditor 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 472:VarifiedEditor 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 442:Martinevans123 414:Martinevans123 403: 402: 384: 383: 373:Martinevans123 331: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 310:Martinevans123 306:Nick Raynsford 267: 266: 265: 264: 254:Martinevans123 242: 241: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 142: 141: 89: 86: 83: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3147: 3138: 3137: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3117: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3083: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3056: 3055:Hope Not Hate 3049: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3033: 3029: 3022: 3012: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2992: 2988: 2983: 2979: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2881: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2858: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2789: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2702: 2694: 2686: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2666: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2626: 2623:I've removed 2622: 2621: 2620: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2609:123.237.77.33 2606: 2594: 2591: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2550:123.237.77.33 2547: 2536: 2530: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2487: 2482: 2481: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2445: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2422: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2395: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2375: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2355: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2318: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2298: 2295: 2294: 2289: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2212: 2208: 2202: 2201:edit conflict 2197: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2156: 2152: 2146: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2023: 2016: 2014: 2013: 2010: 2009: 2008: 1993: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1962: 1958: 1955: 1954: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1929: 1926: 1922: 1919: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881:70.106.198.41 1878: 1872: 1867: 1861: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1839:extremists.-- 1837: 1834: 1833:Sun on Sunday 1826: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1778: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1746: 1742: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1716: 1712: 1705: 1699: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1659: 1658: 1653: 1644: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1624: 1620: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1434: 1431: 1427: 1426:this MOD page 1423: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1391: 1383: 1381: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1360: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1233: 1225: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1091: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1008: 993: 989: 981: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 952: 951: 947: 943: 939: 938: 937: 934: 933: 932: 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 895: 894:edit conflict 890: 889: 888: 885: 884: 883: 868: 864: 861: 859: 856: 852: 851: 850: 849: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 820: 814: 811: 810: 809: 793: 792: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 774: 773: 771: 767: 763: 762:139.216.101.6 759: 749: 727: 723: 719: 715: 714: 713: 710: 709: 708: 693: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 598: 595: 594: 593: 578: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 513: 509: 505: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 481: 477: 473: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 451: 447: 443: 439: 438: 437: 433: 429: 428:Shakehandsman 425: 424: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 406: 405: 404: 401: 397: 393: 389: 386: 385: 382: 378: 374: 370: 369: 368: 367: 364: 363: 362: 347: 344: 340: 337: 329: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 302: 301: 298: 297: 296: 281: 278:According to 277: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 263: 259: 255: 250: 246: 245: 244: 243: 240: 237: 236: 235: 219: 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 200: 199:Shakehandsman 197:I agree with 189: 185: 181: 180:Shakehandsman 177: 176:Boris Johnson 172: 171: 170: 167: 166: 165: 150: 146: 145: 144: 143: 140: 136: 132: 131:Shakehandsman 128: 125: 122: 121: 120: 119: 116: 115: 114: 99: 95: 87: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3120: 3119: 3114: 3086: 3085: 3060:— Preceding 3053: 3037:Gilded Snail 3034: 3030: 3026: 2995: 2994: 2914: 2913: 2861: 2794: 2772: 2771: 2767:The Guardian 2766: 2716: 2715: 2698: 2669: 2668: 2629: 2628: 2603:— Preceding 2599: 2592: 2589: 2569: 2568: 2544:— Preceding 2540: 2513: 2512: 2457: 2456: 2428: 2427: 2399: 2380: 2358: 2357: 2321: 2301: 2300: 2291: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2232: 2228: 2216:This is Paul 2178: 2177: 2160: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2129: 2128: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2055: 2054: 2034: 2030: 2024: 2020: 1996: 1995: 1990: 1965: 1964: 1932: 1931: 1875:— Preceding 1868: 1865: 1841: 1840: 1832: 1830: 1805: 1804: 1782: 1781: 1774: 1749: 1748: 1719: 1718: 1709: 1682: 1681: 1656: 1649: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1619:This article 1594: 1593: 1558: 1557: 1532: 1531: 1491: 1490: 1460:— Preceding 1437: 1436: 1395:— Preceding 1387: 1363: 1362: 1356: 1236: 1235: 1229: 1152: 1151: 1135:AndyTheGrump 1095: 1066: 1065: 1024: 1023: 996: 995: 991: 985: 920: 919: 871: 870: 824: 797: 796: 778:Islamophobia 756:— Preceding 753: 750:Islamophobia 696: 695: 581: 580: 392:AndyTheGrump 350: 349: 333: 284: 283: 248: 223: 222: 203:AnarchoGhost 196: 153: 152: 149:WP:RECENTISM 102: 101: 91: 78: 43: 37: 2940:E.M.Gregory 2936:WP:REDACTED 2887:E.M.Gregory 2870:E.M.Gregory 2842:E.M.Gregory 2820:E.M.Gregory 2798:E.M.Gregory 2747:E.M.Gregory 2625:Udham Singh 2565:Udham Singh 2339:Nick Cooper 2293:Private Eye 2288:WP:BLPCRIME 2250:Nick Cooper 2211:English law 2079:Nick Cooper 1780:included?-- 1621:in today's 1098:Jonny Quick 956:Alfietucker 942:Alfietucker 905:Alfietucker 840:Alfietucker 343:this source 221:memorial.-- 36:This is an 2455:article.-- 2120:WP:SOAPBOX 1714:addresses. 867:WP:BLPNAME 855:WP:BLPNAME 836:WP:BLPNAME 631:Al Jazeera 98:WP:CRYSTAL 3110:Broadmoor 3058:agenda. 2991:this edit 2905:this edit 2763:This cite 2701:this edit 2665:this edit 2484:material. 1428:, as the 1320:'''tAD''' 1291:'''tAD''' 1190:'''tAD''' 1047:'''tAD''' 988:Legal aid 982:Legal aid 336:this edit 151:issues.-- 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 3062:unsigned 2975:Lewisham 2605:unsigned 2546:unsigned 2509:WP:TOPIC 2426:month.-- 2354:Hegemony 1889:contribs 1877:unsigned 1657:innotata 1474:contribs 1462:unsigned 1409:contribs 1397:unsigned 1273:Formerip 1060:change." 758:unsigned 410:WP:UNDUE 2961:or the 2710:or the 2507:It has 1745:WP:10YT 1332:Agree. 992:The Sun 832:YouTube 643:Archant 330:Shomrim 39:archive 3050:Biased 2883:WP:OWN 2651:Kleon3 2209:under 1064:not.-- 865:meets 577:WP:COI 249:Victim 2971:Argos 2765:from 2127:do.-- 1512:step? 16:< 3123:♦Ian 3116:This 3089:♦Ian 3082:here 3070:talk 3041:talk 2998:♦Ian 2973:in 2944:talk 2917:♦Ian 2909:here 2891:talk 2874:talk 2862:not' 2846:talk 2824:talk 2802:talk 2775:♦Ian 2751:talk 2719:♦Ian 2672:♦Ian 2655:talk 2632:♦Ian 2613:talk 2572:♦Ian 2554:talk 2516:♦Ian 2495:talk 2460:♦Ian 2452:here 2431:♦Ian 2409:talk 2387:talk 2361:♦Ian 2343:talk 2328:talk 2304:♦Ian 2276:talk 2254:talk 2238:talk 2220:talk 2205:The 2181:♦Ian 2166:talk 2132:♦Ian 2109:talk 2083:talk 2058:♦Ian 2040:talk 1999:♦Ian 1992:This 1968:♦Ian 1961:here 1935:♦Ian 1906:talk 1885:talk 1844:♦Ian 1808:♦Ian 1785:♦Ian 1777:this 1752:♦Ian 1722:♦Ian 1685:♦Ian 1672:talk 1630:♦Ian 1623:Mail 1597:♦Ian 1561:♦Ian 1535:♦Ian 1518:talk 1494:♦Ian 1470:talk 1440:♦Ian 1422:here 1405:talk 1366:♦Ian 1359:here 1338:talk 1324:talk 1309:talk 1295:talk 1277:talk 1263:talk 1239:♦Ian 1232:this 1208:talk 1194:talk 1179:talk 1155:♦Ian 1139:talk 1117:talk 1102:talk 1069:♦Ian 1051:talk 1027:♦Ian 999:♦Ian 964:talk 946:talk 923:♦Ian 909:talk 874:♦Ian 844:talk 800:♦Ian 786:talk 776:see 766:talk 722:talk 699:♦Ian 651:talk 639:Vice 637:and 633:and 584:♦Ian 542:talk 508:talk 476:talk 446:talk 432:talk 418:talk 396:talk 377:talk 353:♦Ian 314:talk 287:♦Ian 258:talk 226:♦Ian 218:here 207:talk 184:talk 156:♦Ian 135:talk 105:♦Ian 2699:Re 2053:.-- 1489:.-- 780:. 579:.-- 390:). 334:Re 3130:M♦ 3125:Ma 3096:M♦ 3091:Ma 3072:) 3043:) 3005:M♦ 3000:Ma 2946:) 2924:M♦ 2919:Ma 2893:) 2876:) 2848:) 2826:) 2804:) 2782:M♦ 2777:Ma 2753:) 2742:, 2726:M♦ 2721:Ma 2679:M♦ 2674:Ma 2657:) 2639:M♦ 2634:Ma 2615:) 2579:M♦ 2574:Ma 2556:) 2523:M♦ 2518:Ma 2497:) 2467:M♦ 2462:Ma 2438:M♦ 2433:Ma 2411:) 2389:) 2368:M♦ 2363:Ma 2345:) 2330:) 2311:M♦ 2306:Ma 2299:-- 2278:) 2256:) 2240:) 2222:) 2188:M♦ 2183:Ma 2168:) 2139:M♦ 2134:Ma 2111:) 2085:) 2065:M♦ 2060:Ma 2042:) 2006:M♦ 2001:Ma 1975:M♦ 1970:Ma 1942:M♦ 1937:Ma 1908:) 1891:) 1887:• 1851:M♦ 1846:Ma 1815:M♦ 1810:Ma 1792:M♦ 1787:Ma 1759:M♦ 1754:Ma 1729:M♦ 1724:Ma 1692:M♦ 1687:Ma 1674:) 1637:M♦ 1632:Ma 1604:M♦ 1599:Ma 1568:M♦ 1563:Ma 1542:M♦ 1537:Ma 1520:) 1501:M♦ 1496:Ma 1476:) 1472:• 1447:M♦ 1442:Ma 1435:-- 1411:) 1407:• 1373:M♦ 1368:Ma 1340:) 1326:) 1311:) 1297:) 1279:) 1265:) 1246:M♦ 1241:Ma 1210:) 1196:) 1181:) 1162:M♦ 1157:Ma 1141:) 1119:) 1104:) 1076:M♦ 1071:Ma 1053:) 1034:M♦ 1029:Ma 1006:M♦ 1001:Ma 966:) 948:) 930:M♦ 925:Ma 911:) 881:M♦ 876:Ma 846:) 807:M♦ 802:Ma 788:) 768:) 724:) 706:M♦ 701:Ma 653:) 591:M♦ 586:Ma 544:) 510:) 478:) 448:) 434:) 420:) 398:) 379:) 360:M♦ 355:Ma 348:-- 338:: 316:) 294:M♦ 289:Ma 260:) 233:M♦ 228:Ma 209:) 186:) 163:M♦ 158:Ma 137:) 112:M♦ 107:Ma 64:← 3127:c 3093:c 3068:( 3039:( 3002:c 2942:( 2921:c 2889:( 2872:( 2844:( 2822:( 2800:( 2779:c 2749:( 2723:c 2676:c 2653:( 2636:c 2611:( 2576:c 2552:( 2520:c 2493:( 2464:c 2435:c 2423:: 2419:@ 2407:( 2385:( 2365:c 2341:( 2326:( 2308:c 2296:. 2274:( 2252:( 2236:( 2218:( 2203:) 2199:( 2185:c 2164:( 2136:c 2107:( 2081:( 2062:c 2038:( 2003:c 1972:c 1939:c 1927:. 1904:( 1883:( 1848:c 1812:c 1789:c 1756:c 1726:c 1689:c 1670:( 1634:c 1601:c 1565:c 1539:c 1516:( 1498:c 1468:( 1444:c 1403:( 1370:c 1336:( 1322:( 1307:( 1293:( 1275:( 1261:( 1243:c 1206:( 1192:( 1177:( 1159:c 1137:( 1115:( 1100:( 1073:c 1049:( 1031:c 1003:c 962:( 944:( 927:c 907:( 896:) 892:( 878:c 842:( 804:c 784:( 764:( 720:( 703:c 649:( 588:c 540:( 506:( 474:( 444:( 430:( 416:( 394:( 375:( 357:c 312:( 291:c 256:( 230:c 205:( 182:( 160:c 133:( 109:c 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index