1767:, at least on this talk page, seems to be hampered by their ambiguous, unnecessary references to popular opinion, such as in comments like " The hot take on LL at the moment is that it was a ruse sold to the sheeple, and that those who have truly taken the red pill can see LL for the lie it is (as there was no virus)." This type of engagement would not be tolerated in less senior editors or admins, and suggests an abuse of privilege. There are minor editors here trying in earnest to inform the public's encyclopedic search for whether sars-cov-2 and similar viruses may have been tied to laboratory research, a subject which has been given better consideration in the wiki pages covering the earlier SARS outbreaks. We may not like the conclusions the public draws on the information presented, but, for example, if there is a source that can substantiate that any research on sars like viruses was being done on animal vectors in laboratories in Wuhan, that is relevant information and should be provided, if not here then in the pertinent articles.
1803:, I urge you not to make assumptions about fellow editors' intentions, please. All information is worth evaluating. I am not afraid of any information from any source, whether I previously agreed with any conclusions drawn, because I am confident in my reading comprehension and my own skepticism. This complaint is specifically about elitist tendencies masqueraded as impartiality that are rampant among veteran editors. My quote of yours above was to call attention to the fact that all editors, veteran or other wise, fall subject to letting their personal histories influence their speech to other editors and the way they interact with edits. Anyways, it might calm you down to hear me summarize my understanding of the origin. I believe reports that the wet market in wuhan was the primary location of spread of sars cov 2 in Wuhan. I believe the
1857:
the sense of "to find credible." And in that regard, I was trying to show you that I find credible some of the same sources you do, like the ones I listed, and which are used as sources elsewhere in
Knowledge. This talk page is for us to come to a consensus on what language and sources we agree should be used, i.e., what we as a group agree is credible. Finally, yes, I concede that no sources conclude that an ancestor virus to Sars-cov-2 had been reported to have been in possession by the Wuhan lab, or any lab. As you notice, I have not even attempted to make edits on this actual article yet. At some point, what will become relevant in the future on some other Knowledge article is whether any virology labs are harboring closely related viruses to Sars-cov-2 as well as the track record for lab accidents of those labs.
628:
607:
2113:
progressing to severe disease, and for whom alternative antiviral therapies are not accessible or clinically appropriatehe.The COVID-19 Treatment
Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends using molnupiravir 800 mg orally (PO) twice daily for 5 days as an alternative therapy in nonhospitalized patients aged ≥18 years with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk of disease progression when ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid) and remdesivir are not available, feasible to use, or clinically appropriate
638:
515:
488:
182:
1817:
specifically is not sufficiently close enough to be implicated as an ancestor to Sars-cov-2. I do not know, and maybe never will know whether the line of transmission of Sars-cov-2 from wild bat to Wuhan wet market ever included a brief stay as a lab sample at a nearby virology lab. But to assert that encyclopedia readers are not to be trusted with the information that a lab analyzing closely related sars viruses could at some point have been involved with accidental escape is elitist at best.
455:
1495:
918:
2019:
166:
575:
942:
351:
320:
1305:
995:
974:
410:
737:
716:
1289:
2085:
1971:
290:
1083:
1404:
446:
836:
805:
2043:
That's great! However, I would have found it easier to trust it from the start, if i saw that it was published in an international journal, as I'm not familiar with
Russian media. While the Russian source is preferable if you know the outlet, given its coverage of the creation, adding an international journal might help clarify its legitimacy for many people.
1005:
846:
1339:... the article about the '2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak' was created on January 5, 2020. Four days later, a new article was spun off from it, dedicated solely to the 'Novel coronavirus' – officially known as 2019-nCoV. Yet another was created in February to detail the symptoms of the respiratory disease caused by the virus.
1856:
When you said "Your arguments seems to be a complaint that evidence is being presented you don't like?", it seemed to me that you were assuming to know what evidence I intend to not like from the get go, i.e., you assume I'm a wacko conspiracy theorist. Please read my use of the phrase "I believe" in
2042:
True. The documentation is excellent, but as I'm not an expert, I found it challenging to verify whether the composed image was completely covered by it. After reading through the awarding discussion, I saw that the
Russian outlet has a good reputation and that the image was verified by experts.
2112:
Molnupiravir should be added to treatments section on
December 23, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for molnupiravir for the treatment of adults with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are within 5 days of symptom onset, who are at high risk of
1816:
to that article that states the Wuhan team did bring a field sampled virus, later confirmed to be RaTG13 , back to the Wuhan lab and published that data in 2016. Which means the Lab in Wuhan lab possessed highly related samples of sars viruses. I accept but find it not salient that RatG13
1807:
published by the Wuhan researchers themselves that sars-cov-2 initially developed in wild bats. I also believe that article's following statement: "Simplot analysis showed that 2019-nCoV was highly similar throughout the genome to RaTG13 (Fig.
1950:
Under any laboratory escape scenario, SARS-CoV-2 would have to have been present in a laboratory prior to the pandemic, yet no evidence exists to support such a notion and no sequence has been identified that could have served as a
1386:
Asked by
Haaretz to gauge the merits of the English-language article on the virus, Prof. Nadav Davidovitch, who heads the department of public health at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, said he was 'pleasantly surprised by its
2186:
1211:(exact capitalisation and punctuation) is the common name of the virus and should be used for the main article's title, as well as in the body of all articles, and in the title of all other articles/category pages/etc. (
1836:
927:
815:
1362:
Those pages include the
Knowledge article for the virus itself, known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, the disease it causes, COVID-19, and the ongoing global pandemic the coronavirus has
2176:
1762:
when speaking to other editors as antagonistic. I agree. It's my suggestion that an additional admin who has not yet contributed would be more helpful for improving this article. The professionalism of
159:
2191:
174:
565:
1413:
for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
459:
1842:
as author. As is stated in the lableak article, "There is no evidence that any laboratory had samples of SARS-CoV-2, or a plausible ancestor virus, prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic".
2266:
932:
1233:
to use, but they should be consistent within articles as much as possible. There is agreement that there should be six levels of shading, plus gray for areas with no instances or no data. (
1713:
There is consensus that the terms "Wuhan virus" or "China virus" should not be used in the Lead of the article. The terms and their history can be discussed in the body of the article. (
1475:
2271:
1714:
1122:
951:
819:
2261:
2246:
2156:
1145:
787:
777:
864:
2201:
1674:
555:
281:
868:
195:
2311:
2221:
584:
498:
1256:
1245:
1234:
753:
1785:← there is none (as reliable sources tell us). This is rather the point. Your arguments seems to be a complaint that evidence is being presented you don't like?
2281:
2241:
1179:
1164:
956:
531:
2196:
660:
1255:, ranges should use fixed round numbers (as opposed to updating dynamically). There is no consensus on what base population to use for per capita maps. (
103:
1734:
about whether the announcement by the FBI and the U.S. Department of Energy that they support the COVID-19 lab leak theory should be in the lede of the
2256:
2231:
2211:
2171:
908:
898:
744:
721:
698:
688:
589:
2286:
1061:
2291:
2181:
2161:
522:
493:
208:
2301:
2236:
2216:
1051:
2306:
2276:
109:
1783:
if there is a source that can substantiate that any research on sars like viruses was being done on animal vectors in laboratories in Wuhan
2002:
as Source to the
Caption of the File:Coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2.png, since it's only sourced with a russian news report from its creation.
1452:
1429:
1107:
873:
664:
2251:
2226:
2206:
1410:
1027:
68:
1370:
1667:
2026:
1106:
for pages relating to COVID-19. They have so far discussed items listed below. Please discuss proposed improvements to them at the
1500:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
1524:
1212:
1200:
1175:
1835:
so discussion of your personal beliefs is not appropriate. When treating such "beliefs" Knowledge follows reliable sources like
2296:
2166:
1637:
1626:
1612:
1601:
1590:
1579:
1568:
1513:
1216:
1196:
1149:
427:
123:
54:
1092:
859:
810:
651:
612:
128:
44:
1731:
1724:
1018:
979:
98:
468:
337:
327:
388:
89:
289:
277:
273:
232:
392:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
300:
1735:
1313:
150:
2091:
1977:
1195:(full caps) is preferable in the body of all articles, and in the title of all articles/category pages/etc.(
215:
133:
423:
1885:
1847:
1790:
1153:
474:
2048:
2007:
417:
445:
1862:
1832:
1831:
I never said anything about your "intentions". You say you "believe" many things but this is not a
1822:
1772:
1103:
749:
431:
396:
79:
1240:
There is no consensus about whether the legend, the date, and other elements should appear in the
1026:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
752:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
530:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
222:
17:
2114:
1912:
Holmes EC, Goldstein SA, Rasmussen AL, Robertson DL, Crits-Christoph A, et al. (September 2021).
1758:
has disproportionate impact on this talk page. Other editors have commented on the tone used by @
1739:
305:
94:
1409:
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
637:
627:
606:
2129:
2062:
2039:
2030:
1942:
527:
75:
1346:
2118:
1933:
1925:
1881:
1877:
1843:
1800:
1786:
1764:
1759:
1755:
1607:
18 February 2020, 2019 novel coronavirus → Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,
1327:
1129:
302:
2137:
2044:
2003:
851:
643:
514:
487:
359:
201:
1809:
1813:
1323:
917:
1937:
1913:
1858:
1818:
1768:
1620:
1010:
574:
350:
2150:
1839:
which goes into detail about RaTG13 conspiracy theories, and has an actual virologist
1632:
24 April 2020, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 → SARS coronavirus 2,
1350:
1804:
409:
319:
941:
1618:
16 March 2020, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 → COVID-19 virus,
1508:
29 April 2020, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 → COVID-19 virus,
2025:
Why do you feel that is preferred? The image's provenance is well documented on
1144:(worldometers.info) as a source due to common errors being observed as noted on
1140:
1929:
1687:
It is recommended to link to this list in your edit summary when reverting, as:
994:
973:
189:
2133:
1304:
1207:
1000:
841:
736:
715:
633:
48:
1519:
12 March 2021, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 → SARS-CoV-2,
1999:
1530:
21 June 2022, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 → SARS-CoV-2,
1945:
1840:
387:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
2061:, but as it goes back to the original sourcing I'm inclined to keep it. –
1812:), with an overall genome sequence identity of 96.2%." I also believe the
1552:
2029:
and the citation is an article from the creators of the original image –
656:
331:
149:
2128:
We need an RS to add information to an article. Also, this looks like a
1347:"Meet the Knowledge editors fighting to keep coronavirus pages accurate"
1374:
1004:
304:
1563:
22 January 2020, Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) → Wuhan coronavirus,
1464:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2#Strains and variants
835:
804:
422:
If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review
2141:
2122:
2065:
2052:
2033:
2011:
1889:
1866:
1851:
1826:
1794:
1776:
1744:
1585:
9 February 2020, 2019 novel coronavirus → 2019 Novel coronavirus,
1023:
1324:"On Knowledge, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation"
659:-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to
871:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at
2187:
Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
165:
2079:
2057:
It's a little unusual for an image caption to have a citation
1965:
1489:
1398:
1299:
1283:
1077:
439:
404:
345:
314:
306:
39:
26:
863:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the
1695:
To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to
1574:
31 January 2020, Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) → 2019-nCoV,
1266:
To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to
1081:
940:
916:
573:
2076:
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 July 2024
1962:
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 July 2024
173:
1476:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants
330:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
2177:
Knowledge vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1697:
1596:
11 February 2020, 2019 novel coronavirus → SARS-CoV-2,
1479:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1456:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1433:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1268:
424:
the relevant Knowledge policy on recruitment of editors
1754:
Reading the talk threads, it seems to me that editor @
1174:" is generally preferred over "physical distancing". (
2192:
B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1159:
For infoboxes on the main articles of countries, use
1022:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
748:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
526:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1690:
2267:Top-importance emergency medicine and EMS articles
1546:
334:, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic.
1725:Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory#Request_for_comment
1541:17 August 2022, SARS-CoV-2 → SARS coronavirus 2,
655:, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all
1876:Even misinformation? I suspect you need to read
1535:
57:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1112:
867:and that biomedical information in any article
2272:Emergency medicine and EMS task force articles
1914:"The origins of SARS-CoV-2: A critical review"
1576:Consensus to move to "2019 novel coronavirus"
865:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
221:
181:
8:
1738:article. Editors are invited to contribute.
1146:the Case Count Task Force common errors page
2262:B-Class emergency medicine and EMS articles
2247:Top-importance Disaster management articles
2157:Knowledge articles that use British English
1675:
1668:
1402:
968:
799:
710:
601:
482:
363:, which has its own spelling conventions (
2202:Top-importance Molecular Biology articles
1936:
1314:mentioned by multiple media organizations
928:the Emergency medicine and EMS task force
762:Knowledge:WikiProject Disaster management
1371:"Why Knowledge Is Immune to Coronavirus"
765:Template:WikiProject Disaster management
430:. Disputes on Knowledge are resolved by
2312:Knowledge pages referenced by the press
2222:All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
1904:
1698:
1665:
1269:
970:
801:
712:
603:
540:Knowledge:WikiProject Molecular Biology
484:
443:
1873:
1782:
543:Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology
418:recruit editors of specific viewpoints
1199:, including the main article itself,
1125:and later practice - consult regular
395:, this should not be changed without
207:
7:
2282:High-importance pulmonology articles
2242:B-Class Disaster management articles
1294:Moves, mentions, and copied material
1016:This article is within the scope of
857:This article is within the scope of
742:This article is within the scope of
649:This article is within the scope of
520:This article is within the scope of
1874:All information is worth evaluating
1510:Speedy close, consensus to not move
1453:2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease
1430:2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease
874:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine
47:for discussing improvements to the
2197:B-Class Molecular Biology articles
1229:There is no consensus about which
25:
18:Talk:Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
1634:Withdrawn by nominator, not moved
1322:Omer Benjakob (9 February 2020).
2257:Top-importance medicine articles
2232:Top-importance COVID-19 articles
2212:Top-importance Genetics articles
2172:Knowledge level-4 vital articles
2083:
2017:
1969:
1493:
1303:
1287:
1003:
993:
972:
869:use high-quality medical sources
844:
834:
803:
735:
714:
636:
626:
605:
513:
486:
453:
444:
408:
349:
318:
288:
69:Click here to start a new topic.
2287:Pulmonology task force articles
1345:Mikael Thalen (24 March 2020).
1056:This article has been rated as
903:This article has been rated as
782:This article has been rated as
745:WikiProject Disaster management
693:This article has been rated as
560:This article has been rated as
2292:All WikiProject Medicine pages
2182:B-Class level-4 vital articles
2162:Knowledge controversial topics
1547:#Requested move 17 August 2022
1369:Omer Benjakob (8 April 2020).
883:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine
673:Knowledge:WikiProject COVID-19
473:It is of interest to multiple
1:
2302:Top-importance virus articles
2237:WikiProject COVID-19 articles
2217:WikiProject Genetics articles
1441:Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
1418:Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
1036:Knowledge:WikiProject Viruses
1030:and see a list of open tasks.
949:This article is supported by
925:This article is supported by
886:Template:WikiProject Medicine
756:and see a list of open tasks.
676:Template:WikiProject COVID-19
582:This article is supported by
534:and see a list of open tasks.
523:WikiProject Molecular Biology
66:Put new text under old text.
2307:WikiProject Viruses articles
2277:B-Class pulmonology articles
1750:Request for additional admin
1536:#Requested move 21 June 2022
1039:Template:WikiProject Viruses
768:Disaster management articles
428:neutral point of view policy
416:There have been attempts to
2106:to reactivate your request.
2094:has been answered. Set the
1992:to reactivate your request.
1980:has been answered. Set the
1745:02:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
1163:for the origin parameter. (
74:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2328:
2066:14:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2000:DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/328
1930:10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.017
1867:20:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
1598:Speedy close, no consensus
1062:project's importance scale
952:the Pulmonology task force
909:project's importance scale
788:project's importance scale
699:project's importance scale
546:Molecular Biology articles
2252:B-Class medicine articles
2227:B-Class COVID-19 articles
2207:B-Class Genetics articles
2142:08:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
2123:08:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
2053:06:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
2034:18:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
2012:18:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
1890:09:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
1852:04:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
1827:22:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
1795:14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
1777:13:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
1730:An editor has started an
1298:
1102:aims to add to and build
1055:
988:
948:
924:
902:
829:
781:
730:
692:
621:
581:
559:
508:
481:
104:Be welcoming to newcomers
33:Skip to table of contents
1736:COVID-19 lab leak theory
1565:Consensus against moving
32:
1587:Speedy close, not moved
585:the Genetics task force
434:, not by majority vote.
2297:B-Class virus articles
2167:B-Class vital articles
1312:This article has been
1263:
1086:
945:
921:
663:and to participate in
578:
99:avoid personal attacks
1998:Request to add Paper
1521:Consensus to not move
1482:) on 23 December 2020
1085:
944:
920:
577:
460:level-4 vital article
282:Auto-archiving period
147:Find medical sources:
124:Neutral point of view
1459:) on 5 February 2020
1436:) on 5 February 2020
1100:WikiProject COVID-19
1093:WikiProject COVID-19
860:WikiProject Medicine
652:WikiProject COVID-19
393:relevant style guide
389:varieties of English
129:No original research
1411:provide attribution
1161:Wuhan, Hubei, China
1138:Refrain from using
1019:WikiProject Viruses
759:Disaster management
750:Disaster management
722:Disaster management
665:project discussions
391:. According to the
340:and edit carefully.
336:Please consult the
1556:Older discussions:
1087:
946:
922:
579:
469:content assessment
328:contentious topics
153:
110:dispute resolution
71:
2110:
2109:
1996:
1995:
1924:(19): 4848–4856.
1659:Current consensus
1654:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1646:
1645:
1623:closed, not moved
1488:
1487:
1397:
1396:
1282:
1281:
1172:Social distancing
1108:project talk page
1076:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1068:
1067:
967:
966:
963:
962:
889:medicine articles
798:
797:
794:
793:
709:
708:
705:
704:
679:COVID-19 articles
600:
599:
596:
595:
537:Molecular Biology
528:Molecular Biology
494:Molecular Biology
438:
437:
426:, as well as the
403:
402:
344:
343:
313:
312:
152:Source guidelines
151:
90:Assume good faith
67:
38:
37:
16:(Redirected from
2319:
2101:
2097:
2087:
2086:
2080:
2021:
2020:
1987:
1983:
1973:
1972:
1966:
1954:
1953:
1940:
1909:
1710:
1702:
1700:
1692:
1677:
1670:
1553:
1497:
1496:
1490:
1406:
1405:
1399:
1389:
1383:
1381:
1365:
1359:
1357:
1341:
1336:
1334:
1328:Wired (magazine)
1307:
1300:
1291:
1290:
1284:
1273:
1271:
1134:
1128:
1123:TfD October 2020
1084:
1078:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1013:
1008:
1007:
997:
990:
989:
984:
976:
969:
891:
890:
887:
884:
881:
854:
849:
848:
847:
838:
831:
830:
825:
822:
807:
800:
770:
769:
766:
763:
760:
739:
732:
731:
726:
718:
711:
681:
680:
677:
674:
671:
646:
641:
640:
630:
623:
622:
617:
609:
602:
566:importance scale
548:
547:
544:
541:
538:
517:
510:
509:
504:
501:
490:
483:
466:
457:
456:
449:
448:
440:
420:to this article.
412:
405:
356:This article is
353:
346:
322:
315:
307:
293:
292:
283:
226:
225:
211:
185:
177:
169:
155:
119:Article policies
40:
27:
21:
2327:
2326:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2147:
2146:
2099:
2095:
2084:
2078:
2018:
1985:
1981:
1970:
1964:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1752:
1728:
1721:
1720:
1708:
1699:purge this page
1696:
1681:
1661:
1494:
1403:
1393:
1392:
1379:
1377:
1368:
1355:
1353:
1344:
1332:
1330:
1321:
1317:
1288:
1278:
1277:
1270:purge this page
1267:
1262:
1132:
1126:
1096:
1082:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1009:
1002:
982:
957:High-importance
888:
885:
882:
879:
878:
852:Medicine portal
850:
845:
843:
823:
813:
767:
764:
761:
758:
757:
724:
678:
675:
672:
669:
668:
644:COVID-19 portal
642:
635:
615:
545:
542:
539:
536:
535:
502:
496:
467:on Knowledge's
464:
454:
397:broad consensus
360:British English
309:
308:
303:
280:
145:
140:
139:
138:
115:
85:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2325:
2323:
2315:
2314:
2309:
2304:
2299:
2294:
2289:
2284:
2279:
2274:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2149:
2148:
2145:
2144:
2108:
2107:
2088:
2077:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
1994:
1993:
1974:
1963:
1960:
1956:
1955:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1751:
1748:
1727:
1722:
1718:
1693:
1689:
1680:
1679:
1672:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1660:
1657:
1652:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1630:
1616:
1605:
1594:
1583:
1572:
1558:
1557:
1551:
1550:
1539:
1528:
1517:
1498:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1460:
1437:
1407:
1395:
1394:
1391:
1390:
1366:
1342:
1318:
1311:
1310:
1308:
1296:
1295:
1292:
1280:
1279:
1261:
1260:
1249:
1238:
1221:
1220:
1215:, overturning
1204:
1184:
1183:
1168:
1157:
1136:
1121:Superseded by
1113:
1097:
1091:
1090:
1088:
1074:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1058:Top-importance
1054:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1042:virus articles
1028:the discussion
1015:
1014:
1011:Viruses portal
998:
986:
985:
983:Top‑importance
977:
965:
964:
961:
960:
947:
937:
936:
933:Top-importance
923:
913:
912:
905:Top-importance
901:
895:
894:
892:
856:
855:
839:
827:
826:
824:Top‑importance
808:
796:
795:
792:
791:
784:Top-importance
780:
774:
773:
771:
754:the discussion
740:
728:
727:
725:Top‑importance
719:
707:
706:
703:
702:
695:Top-importance
691:
685:
684:
682:
648:
647:
631:
619:
618:
616:Top‑importance
610:
598:
597:
594:
593:
590:Top-importance
580:
570:
569:
562:Top-importance
558:
552:
551:
549:
532:the discussion
518:
506:
505:
503:Top‑importance
491:
479:
478:
472:
450:
436:
435:
413:
401:
400:
354:
342:
341:
323:
311:
310:
301:
299:
298:
295:
294:
228:
227:
142:
141:
137:
136:
131:
126:
117:
116:
114:
113:
106:
101:
92:
86:
84:
83:
72:
63:
62:
59:
58:
52:
36:
35:
30:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2324:
2313:
2310:
2308:
2305:
2303:
2300:
2298:
2295:
2293:
2290:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2280:
2278:
2275:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2154:
2152:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2105:
2102:parameter to
2093:
2089:
2082:
2081:
2075:
2067:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2032:
2028:
2027:its file page
2024:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1991:
1988:parameter to
1979:
1975:
1968:
1967:
1961:
1952:
1947:
1944:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1908:
1905:
1901:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1815:
1811:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1761:
1757:
1749:
1747:
1746:
1743:
1742:
1741:TarnishedPath
1737:
1733:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1716:
1712:
1705:
1704:
1701:
1688:
1686:
1678:
1673:
1671:
1666:
1658:
1656:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1628:
1624:
1622:
1617:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:Discussions:
1499:
1492:
1491:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1414:
1412:
1408:
1401:
1400:
1388:
1376:
1372:
1367:
1364:
1352:
1351:The Daily Dot
1348:
1343:
1340:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1309:
1306:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1286:
1285:
1276:
1275:
1272:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1232:
1231:color schemes
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1202:
1201:RM March 2021
1198:
1197:RM April 2020
1194:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1137:
1131:
1124:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1094:
1089:
1080:
1079:
1063:
1059:
1053:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1012:
1006:
1001:
999:
996:
992:
991:
987:
981:
978:
975:
971:
958:
955:(assessed as
954:
953:
943:
939:
938:
934:
931:(assessed as
930:
929:
919:
915:
914:
910:
906:
900:
897:
896:
893:
876:
875:
870:
866:
862:
861:
853:
842:
840:
837:
833:
832:
828:
821:
817:
812:
809:
806:
802:
789:
785:
779:
776:
775:
772:
755:
751:
747:
746:
741:
738:
734:
733:
729:
723:
720:
717:
713:
700:
696:
690:
687:
686:
683:
666:
662:
658:
654:
653:
645:
639:
634:
632:
629:
625:
624:
620:
614:
611:
608:
604:
591:
588:(assessed as
587:
586:
576:
572:
571:
567:
563:
557:
554:
553:
550:
533:
529:
525:
524:
519:
516:
512:
511:
507:
500:
495:
492:
489:
485:
480:
476:
470:
462:
461:
451:
447:
442:
441:
433:
429:
425:
421:
419:
414:
411:
407:
406:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
361:
355:
352:
348:
347:
339:
335:
333:
329:
324:
321:
317:
316:
297:
296:
291:
287:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
234:
230:
229:
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
203:
200:
197:
196:ScienceDirect
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
154:
148:
144:
143:
135:
134:Verifiability
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
121:
120:
111:
107:
105:
102:
100:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
81:
77:
76:Learn to edit
73:
70:
65:
64:
61:
60:
56:
50:
46:
42:
41:
34:
31:
29:
28:
19:
2111:
2103:
2092:edit request
2063:macaddct1984
2058:
2040:Macaddct1984
2031:macaddct1984
2022:
1997:
1989:
1978:edit request
1949:
1921:
1917:
1907:
1899:
1833:WP:NOTAFORUM
1753:
1740:
1729:
1707:
1706:
1694:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1655:
1633:
1619:
1608:
1597:
1586:
1575:
1564:
1542:
1531:
1520:
1509:
1502:
1501:
1385:
1378:. Retrieved
1361:
1354:. Retrieved
1338:
1331:. Retrieved
1265:
1264:
1252:
1241:
1230:
1223:
1222:
1206:
1192:
1186:
1185:
1171:
1160:
1139:
1115:
1114:
1099:
1098:
1057:
1017:
950:
926:
904:
872:
858:
783:
743:
694:
650:
583:
561:
521:
475:WikiProjects
458:
415:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
357:
325:
285:
231:
218:
212:
204:
198:
192:
186:
178:
170:
162:
156:
146:
118:
43:This is the
1882:Hob Gadling
1844:Bon courage
1801:Bon courage
1787:Bon courage
1765:Bon courage
1760:Bon courage
1756:Bon courage
1253:map legends
1141:Worldometer
820:Pulmonology
358:written in
55:not a forum
2151:Categories
2096:|answered=
2045:LukeTriton
2004:LukeTriton
1982:|answered=
1951:precursor.
1920:(Review).
1900:References
1715:April 2020
1333:9 February
1217:April 2020
1208:SARS-CoV-2
1187:Page title
1176:April 2020
1165:March 2020
1154:April 2020
1150:April 2020
338:procedures
49:SARS-CoV-2
2023:Question:
1878:WP:FRINGE
1859:UserSwamp
1819:UserSwamp
1769:UserSwamp
1638:permalink
1627:permalink
1613:permalink
1602:permalink
1591:permalink
1580:permalink
1569:permalink
1543:Withdrawn
1525:permalink
1514:permalink
1387:quality.'
1244:itself. (
1242:map image
1213:June 2022
1135:guidance.
1104:consensus
1095:consensus
816:Emergency
463:is rated
432:consensus
369:travelled
112:if needed
95:Be polite
45:talk page
1946:34480864
1814:addendum
1380:10 April
1356:31 March
1257:May 2020
1246:May 2020
1235:May 2020
1193:COVID-19
1180:May 2020
880:Medicine
811:Medicine
670:COVID-19
657:COVID-19
613:COVID-19
499:Genetics
381:artefact
332:COVID-19
286:365 days
233:Archives
202:Springer
167:Cochrane
80:get help
53:This is
51:article.
2130:copyvio
1938:8373617
1805:article
1691:] item
1621:WP:SNOW
1472:history
1462:Copied
1449:history
1439:Copied
1426:history
1416:Copied
1375:Haaretz
1363:caused.
1130:Current
1116:General
1060:on the
1033:Viruses
1024:viruses
980:Viruses
907:on the
786:on the
697:on the
564:on the
465:B-class
385:analyse
377:defence
2115:Ferid9
2059:at all
471:scale.
373:centre
365:colour
190:OpenMD
160:PubMed
2134:Vgbyp
2100:|ans=
2090:This
1986:|ans=
1976:This
1685:NOTE:
1609:Moved
1532:Moved
1468:oldid
1445:oldid
1422:oldid
452:This
216:Wiley
108:Seek
2138:talk
2119:talk
2049:talk
2008:talk
1943:PMID
1918:Cell
1886:talk
1880:. --
1863:talk
1848:talk
1837:this
1823:talk
1791:talk
1773:talk
1480:diff
1474:) →
1457:diff
1451:) →
1434:diff
1428:) →
1382:2020
1358:2020
1335:2020
1251:For
661:join
326:The
209:Trip
183:Gale
175:DOAJ
97:and
2098:or
1984:or
1934:PMC
1926:doi
1922:184
1732:RfC
1224:Map
1148:. (
1110:.
1052:Top
899:Top
778:Top
689:Top
556:Top
223:TWL
2153::
2140:)
2132:.
2121:)
2104:no
2051:)
2010:)
1990:no
1948:.
1941:.
1932:.
1916:.
1888:)
1865:)
1850:)
1825:)
1810:1c
1793:)
1775:)
1717:)
1711:1.
1470:,
1447:,
1424:,
1384:.
1373:.
1360:.
1349:.
1337:.
1326:.
1203:).
1178:,
1152:,
1133:}}
1127:{{
959:).
935:).
818:/
814::
592:).
497::
383:,
379:,
375:,
371:,
367:,
284::
278:11
276:,
274:10
272:,
268:,
264:,
260:,
256:,
252:,
248:,
244:,
240:,
78:;
2136:(
2117:(
2047:(
2038:@
2006:(
1928::
1884:(
1861:(
1846:(
1821:(
1799:@
1789:(
1771:(
1763:@
1709:0
1703:.
1676:e
1669:v
1640:)
1636:(
1629:)
1625:(
1615:)
1611:(
1604:)
1600:(
1593:)
1589:(
1582:)
1578:(
1571:)
1567:(
1549:)
1545:(
1538:)
1534:(
1527:)
1523:(
1516:)
1512:(
1478:(
1466:(
1455:(
1443:(
1432:(
1420:(
1316::
1274:.
1259:)
1248:)
1237:)
1219:)
1182:)
1170:"
1167:)
1156:)
1064:.
911:.
877:.
790:.
701:.
667:.
568:.
477:.
399:.
270:9
266:8
262:7
258:6
254:5
250:4
246:3
242:2
238:1
235::
219:·
213:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
179:·
171:·
163:·
157:·
82:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.