Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Nandigram

Source 📝

573:
particular purposes. In my opinion in its current state, the bulk of this material (especially the section designated "politics") is completely useless as an encyclopedia article within the context of the Knowledge (XXG) project. All material included in any article must consist of properly cited information from reputably published mainstream sources, no original research is allowed and under no circumstances should Knowledge (XXG) policies insisting on a neutral point of view be violated. Thank you.
638:
page. I can easily see how this article is, once again, going to degrade into a completely 'unencyclopedic' condition, if this trend is not corrected. Please attempt to adhere to Knowledge (XXG)'s policy regarding maintaining a neutral point of view when adding material and also please keep in mind that any material that is not supported by a citation from a reputable mainstream previously published source can be removed at any time. thank you.
398: 374: 234: 296: 265: 21: 306: 464:
Today on 20th April'08 again Mamta Banerjee get hited by CPIM CADERS Including POLICE CADERS of CPIM, CULPRIT of this RAJ is Buddhadeb Bhattachariya. Its the most shameful event In India and across World. Debashis Chakraborty has been appointed in Nandigram as Officer in Charge (OC) in Nandigram. Who
637:
Once again non-neutral inflammatory rhetoric appears to be creeping its way back into the article. Perhaps it would be useful, if material was first placed here on the discussion page for review and agreement by other editors and then if a consensus is reached, it can be transferred to the "main"
549:
This article has so many problems associated with its tone, style and lack of neutrality, in my opinion, it's going to require a major rewrite of the material by a disinterested outside specialist to even come close to meeting basic policy requirements on Knowledge (XXG). Please do not remove the
572:
It appears to me that this situation has been going on for a long time and the result is that instead of an actual encyclopedia article that conforms to Knowledge (XXG) policy, it seems we have instead, a collection of inflamatory rhetoric being posted by *all* sides of the debate for their own
560:
I have tried this on two occasions, putting in a lot of effort to ensure neutrality. But within a couple of days, one side or the other have deleted my edits and used this article and associated articles as a blog. There is no commitment on either side of the argument for a debate or a sincere
518:
What you are saying is that any CPM source or source with perceived CPM sympathies should not be used. However, Knowledge (XXG) is committed to a neutral point of view in which all views are represented. Please feel free to include reports critical of the CPM as well as those that support its
592:, which also contains unencyclopaedic material and terms, eg "carnage", "barbaric". I understand that this is an emotive subject, but standards must be upheld and I don't have the time or patience to rewrite such articles if my changes are unilaterally deleted by a non-user.-- 769:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! --
694:
I did some cosmetic tasks on this page again...This ain't a result of any political affiliation, but because of the large amount of controversy that I saw about this issue and the wiki editing war on this. Hope that I will be able to help wiki
709:
I have bifurcated the disputed section into two. The first section has been retained as Politics and the second section has been named Conflict - where the dispute can be discussed. Doxa 08:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
196: 983: 476:
It is the CPM and speculative media reports that claim the involvement of the TMC. No unbiased first-hand reports point to the involvement of TMC. Naxalite involvement and its extent is also debatable.
963: 532:
All I am saying is, please fairly represent the views of the independent media, whether it is pro or against CPM. And dont rely upon news media with CPI(M) sympathies when asserting facts. --
438:. A short description of that history would be very nice. There is a book, "Nandigramer Sangrami Itihas" in Bangla by local historian Kanailal Das, which may be a helpful resource. 948: 978: 819: 412: 871: 867: 853: 190: 988: 973: 122: 958: 388: 41:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. 839: 407: 279: 582:
I agree. In fact, if you take any section of the article that has been written by an anon IP, you will find it has been plagiarised from a blog, eg this
933: 968: 953: 364: 28: 128: 943: 354: 680:
Some pro CPI(M) propoganda is being carried out by some vandals with no user names. This is not allowed in Wiki I presume. So I fixed them--
661:
should be placed in the relevant article. There is no point duplicating efforts, which complicate the editing of this controversial issue.--
73: 383: 275: 993: 938: 829: 504:
Some mainstream print media like ABP/Telegraph and The Hindu(chief editor N.Ram) are known for their pro-industry and pro-CPM sympathies
820:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120217023009/http://news.oneindia.in/2007/11/30/nandigram-peoples-struggle-heroic--clark-1196438590.html
142: 44: 32: 849:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
625:
This article will give a better idea and a look from leftists side which is lacking here just like mainstream anti-communist media.
588:. Anti-communist contributors to this article have done much the same. I suggest semi-protection of this article and the one on the 87: 147: 63: 611: 117: 823: 245: 329: 319: 270: 108: 914: 726: 211: 840:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090705203351/http://abclive.in/abclive_regional/nandigram_gets_solace_from_buddhadeb.html
178: 742:
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at
152: 50: 700: 685: 465:
has a very bad history in Administration, CPIM Caders will kill everybody in Bengal, they will not leave anybody.
870:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
809: 843: 643: 251: 233: 905: 801: 714: 607: 172: 797: 439: 98: 889:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
877: 800:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 113: 168: 830:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090705203734/http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=235262
752:
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
696: 681: 615: 38: 666: 639: 574: 551: 204: 218: 874:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
890: 775: 658: 626: 589: 498:
The CPI(M) statements are being relied upon too much. They are the ones who have been accused.
94: 833: 758:
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
722: 897: 824:
http://news.oneindia.in/2007/11/30/nandigram-peoples-struggle-heroic--clark-1196438590.html
755:
There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
856:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 662: 593: 562: 520: 452: 451:
t there does seem to be some Naxalite involvement, eg the use of fire bombs and guns.--
184: 896:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
863: 397: 927: 533: 509: 501:
Non-political and independent reports (many available on the net) are not being used.
478: 771: 743: 736: 311: 586: 434:
Nandigram has a history of struggle against colonial rule of British raj and for
718: 446: 862:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 373: 301: 810:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170729135056/http://www.dospiwb.org.in/site.php
844:
http://abclive.in/abclive_regional/nandigram_gets_solace_from_buddhadeb.html
793: 67: 295: 264: 53:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
761:
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
813: 585:
is largely taken from a blog by the Communist leader Prakash Karat:
327:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 550:
templates I have added until these issues are resolved. Thank you.
494:
The following are the reasons for several biases in this section:-
324: 919: 779: 704: 689: 670: 647: 619: 596: 577: 565: 554: 536: 523: 512: 481: 455: 442: 227: 58: 15: 396: 372: 627:
http://www.frontlineonnet.com/stories/20071221503204400.htm
834:
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=235262
804:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
984:
Start-Class Indian geography articles of Low-importance
583: 323:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 203: 866:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 545:
Major Quality and Non-NPOV Issues With This Article
217: 964:Start-Class West Bengal articles of Mid-importance 604:who the hell r u to comment with such authority? 76:for general discussion of the article's subject. 735:removing POV tag with no active discussion per 852:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 949:Start-Class India articles of Mid-importance 231: 259: 792:I have just modified 4 external links on 979:Low-importance Indian geography articles 785:External links modified (February 2018) 261: 989:WikiProject Indian geography articles 974:Start-Class Indian geography articles 561:attempt at a neutral point of view.-- 7: 934:Knowledge (XXG) controversial topics 317:This article is within the scope of 959:Mid-importance West Bengal articles 250:It is of interest to the following 66:for discussing improvements to the 814:http://www.dospiwb.org.in/site.php 14: 796:. Please take a moment to review 339:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 93:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 969:WikiProject West Bengal articles 954:Start-Class West Bengal articles 304: 294: 263: 232: 88:Click here to start a new topic. 19: 629:comment posted by 203.13.168.1 359:This article has been rated as 43:Content must be written from a 27:The subject of this article is 633:NPOV Again Not Being Respected 508:Editors please look into this 408:the Indian geography workgroup 1: 944:Mid-importance India articles 920:02:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC) 648:23:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 620:18:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 597:14:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 578:03:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 566:00:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 555:22:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 405:This article is supported by 381:This article is supported by 85:Put new text under old text. 671:12:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 462:== CMIP RAJ AT NANDIGRAM == 37:When updating the article, 1010: 994:WikiProject India articles 939:Start-Class India articles 883:(last update: 5 June 2024) 789:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 537:02:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 524:17:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 513:05:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 482:05:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 456:20:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 443:07:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 365:project's importance scale 342:Template:WikiProject India 780:15:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 404: 380: 358: 289: 258: 123:Be welcoming to newcomers 39:be bold, but not reckless 705:22:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 690:05:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 676:Editings by some vandals 384:WikiProject West Bengal 401: 377: 240:This article is rated 118:avoid personal attacks 31:and content may be in 400: 376: 244:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 143:Neutral point of view 45:neutral point of view 864:regular verification 430:History of Nandigram 148:No original research 854:After February 2018 657:The details of the 908:InternetArchiveBot 859:InternetArchiveBot 402: 378: 246:content assessment 129:dispute resolution 90: 884: 731: 717:comment added by 659:Nandigram dispute 622: 610:comment added by 590:Nandigram dispute 427: 426: 423: 422: 419: 418: 320:WikiProject India 226: 225: 109:Assume good faith 86: 57: 56: 1001: 918: 909: 882: 881: 860: 730: 711: 605: 347: 346: 343: 340: 337: 314: 309: 308: 307: 298: 291: 290: 285: 282: 267: 260: 243: 237: 236: 228: 222: 221: 207: 138:Article policies 59: 23: 22: 16: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1000: 999: 998: 924: 923: 912: 907: 875: 868:have permission 858: 802:this simple FaQ 787: 740: 712: 697:Radhakrishnansk 682:Radhakrishnansk 678: 655: 653:Dispute details 635: 547: 492: 445:Shamik Sarkar ( 432: 344: 341: 338: 335: 334: 310: 305: 303: 283: 273: 241: 164: 159: 158: 157: 134: 104: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1007: 1005: 997: 996: 991: 986: 981: 976: 971: 966: 961: 956: 951: 946: 941: 936: 926: 925: 902: 901: 894: 847: 846: 838:Added archive 836: 828:Added archive 826: 818:Added archive 816: 808:Added archive 786: 783: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 759: 756: 739: 733: 677: 674: 654: 651: 640:Deconstructhis 634: 631: 602: 601: 600: 599: 575:Deconstructhis 569: 568: 552:Deconstructhis 546: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 527: 526: 506: 505: 502: 499: 491: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 470: 460: 440:203.197.118.97 431: 428: 425: 424: 421: 420: 417: 416: 413:Low-importance 403: 393: 392: 389:Mid-importance 379: 369: 368: 361:Mid-importance 357: 351: 350: 348: 345:India articles 316: 315: 299: 287: 286: 284:Mid‑importance 268: 256: 255: 249: 238: 224: 223: 161: 160: 156: 155: 150: 145: 136: 135: 133: 132: 125: 120: 111: 105: 103: 102: 91: 82: 81: 78: 77: 71: 55: 54: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1006: 995: 992: 990: 987: 985: 982: 980: 977: 975: 972: 970: 967: 965: 962: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 940: 937: 935: 932: 931: 929: 922: 921: 916: 911: 910: 899: 895: 892: 888: 887: 886: 879: 873: 869: 865: 861: 855: 850: 845: 841: 837: 835: 831: 827: 825: 821: 817: 815: 811: 807: 806: 805: 803: 799: 795: 790: 784: 782: 781: 777: 773: 760: 757: 754: 753: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 745: 738: 734: 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 707: 706: 702: 698: 692: 691: 687: 683: 675: 673: 672: 668: 664: 660: 652: 650: 649: 645: 641: 632: 630: 628: 623: 621: 617: 613: 609: 598: 595: 591: 587: 584: 581: 580: 579: 576: 571: 570: 567: 564: 559: 558: 557: 556: 553: 544: 538: 535: 531: 530: 529: 528: 525: 522: 517: 516: 515: 514: 511: 503: 500: 497: 496: 495: 489: 483: 480: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 468: 467: 463: 458: 457: 454: 449: 447: 444: 441: 437: 429: 414: 411:(assessed as 410: 409: 399: 395: 394: 390: 387:(assessed as 386: 385: 375: 371: 370: 366: 362: 356: 353: 352: 349: 332: 331: 326: 322: 321: 313: 302: 300: 297: 293: 292: 288: 281: 277: 272: 269: 266: 262: 257: 253: 247: 239: 235: 230: 229: 220: 216: 213: 210: 206: 202: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 170: 167: 166:Find sources: 163: 162: 154: 153:Verifiability 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 140: 139: 130: 126: 124: 121: 119: 115: 112: 110: 107: 106: 100: 96: 95:Learn to edit 92: 89: 84: 83: 80: 79: 75: 69: 65: 61: 60: 52: 48: 46: 40: 36: 34: 30: 29:controversial 25: 18: 17: 906: 903: 878:source check 857: 851: 848: 791: 788: 768: 744:Template:POV 741: 737:Template:POV 708: 693: 679: 656: 636: 624: 603: 548: 507: 493: 469: 466: 461: 459: 450: 435: 433: 406: 382: 360: 330:project page 328: 318: 312:India portal 252:WikiProjects 214: 208: 200: 193: 187: 181: 175: 165: 137: 62:This is the 42: 26: 713:—Preceding 606:—Preceding 519:position.-- 276:West Bengal 242:Start-class 191:free images 74:not a forum 928:Categories 915:Report bug 612:61.2.1.102 898:this tool 891:this tool 794:Nandigram 695:better.-- 663:Conjoiner 594:Conjoiner 563:Conjoiner 521:Conjoiner 453:Conjoiner 280:Geography 131:if needed 114:Be polite 68:Nandigram 64:talk page 51:citations 904:Cheers.— 727:contribs 715:unsigned 608:unsigned 534:Panchhee 510:Panchhee 479:Panchhee 99:get help 72:This is 70:article. 49:Include 798:my edit 772:Khazar2 436:tebhaga 363:on the 197:WP refs 185:scholar 33:dispute 719:Ckraju 490:Biases 248:scale. 169:Google 336:India 325:India 271:India 212:JSTOR 173:books 127:Seek 776:talk 723:talk 701:talk 686:talk 667:talk 644:talk 616:talk 205:FENS 179:news 116:and 872:RfC 842:to 832:to 822:to 812:to 355:Mid 219:TWL 930:: 885:. 880:}} 876:{{ 778:) 746:: 729:) 725:• 703:) 688:) 669:) 646:) 618:) 477:-- 448:) 415:). 391:). 278:/ 274:: 199:) 97:; 917:) 913:( 900:. 893:. 774:( 721:( 699:( 684:( 665:( 642:( 614:( 367:. 333:. 254:: 215:· 209:· 201:· 194:· 188:· 182:· 176:· 171:( 101:. 47:. 35:.

Index

controversial
dispute
be bold, but not reckless
neutral point of view
citations
talk page
Nandigram
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.