821:. (2) You **appear** to have stated in a very lengthy posting at the beginning of this discussion that you intend to transfer this entry to yourself as the main author, and as I indicated to you in my reply such a transfer was clearly unacceptable, as you have made --**in my view**--no major or significant effort to properly develop this entry, but rather the opposite--you ***seem, in my view,*** to have made every effort to annihilate it; (3) Also a fact is that instead of discussing things related to the **substance** of this entry--as it is intended for-- you have chosen instead to impose quite forcefully in your second posting your own terms and conditions for an entry that you did not initiate, and ***seemed*** to have a keen interest to acquire or appropriate by completely erasing the history of this entry, only to propose afterwards its deletion when you found that your strategy did not seem to work out. These are the facts. I cannot retract facts. Maybe you can ? (4) Last but not least, the `difficulty in communicating' is mainly one-sided, as it ***seems*** --based on what you have posted here so far-- that your **current** intent is either to take over the entry or push for its deletion--none of which is acceptable; there is no ambiguity about your intentions from what you have posted so far. (The stars ** were added here only for the sole purpose of emphasis, thus hopefully helping communication.)
768:
they refer to prominent members of the organization involved, and/or (2) are consistent with the SMB past and present members' interests, as well as their research interests, and also consistent with the external links officially provided by SMB. Your suggestion about deletion of an entry (that is the SMB entry here) --that you have yourself previously tried to re-"appropriate" by posting only one sentence-- is not only internally inconsistent, but it does indeed point out to a personal, possibly hostile bias of some sort that would indeed violate on your part the NVOP policy of
Knowledge website, so at this point it would seem that you are not posting issues of substance but of a personal nature, which seem to be not only over-stated but also over-inflated; possibly beginning some kind of "vendetta" for merely personal egotistic reasons would not seem to be appropriate either. Best wishes.Bci2Nu 06:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Bci2
894:
comments were in two postings ago severely berating the contents of this SMB entry versions 7 to 14, etc., without any foundation, but again this may have arisen more from your **apparent, or possible**, lack of either specific or general knowledge in
Mathematical Biology rather than from other possible motives. That is also a fact, not my views or interpretation. Hopefully, the links to the entry that I provided and reordered/restyled so that such links are more accessible to the layman may allow you to reconsider and retract your previously berating and scathing comments about such links. Also appreciate your concern about the potential copyright issues that should be soon completely resolved without either changing history or retracting any facts.
817:(1) The links that I made in the current version of this entry are quite legitimate/ related to the substance of the entry, and not "indiscriminate" as you have chosen to incorrectly state; unless you'd be willing to retract that statement there is a factual basis for the possibilities that I raised--not "accusations" that I would have previously 'made'-- as you claimed in the above posting: ***I made no accusations here, or elsewhere**-- I have merely raised the **possibility**, based on your factually incorrect statements about the current contents and links of the present version of this entry, that you cannot substantiate any of your claims as you **appear** to lack significant knowledge of the subject matter of this entry, namely
407:
351:
327:
869:, which I could have done if I were, as you seem to imply I was out to delete the article. I have, on the contrary, gone out of my way to ensure the article could be kept and expanded upon. The rest of your interpretations and views are entirely your own and cannot be substantiated. That being said, despite my reservations about the article's evolution, consider myself disengaged from this article, safe for the copyright issue. I'll let mediation handle the rest.
243:
457:
439:
222:
253:
520:
191:
767:
I believe that your postings in this discussion seem to have repeatedly violated the NVOP policy of
Knowledge, and thus your suggestions may be unacceptable both to Knowledge and Knowledge readers. Furthermore, none of the links for this entry are "indiscriminate" as you suggested above because: {1}
893:
I am prepared to take your latest response at its face value, although I have not seen so far any evidence whatsoever that you have contributed even by adding a comma to the actual expansion of this entry--as it was claimed above to be your intention-- beyond its first sentence. Furthermore, your
739:
article, in other words, a deletion candidate. I suggest addressing these with a higher urgency than building the complete and exhaustive list of topics clearly related to the field of mathematical biology, but a lot more tenuously, to the
Society for mathematical biology.
541:
865:. The copyright issue must be addressed and as long as there is no permission, it has to, at the very least, disappear from the article history. I would have been entirely within both policy and practice to simply nominate the article for
153:
790:
833:
If I may have indeed misunderstood your intentions as discussed above based on facts, I would appreciate some verifiable, factual evidence from you to that effect. Best wishes and good luck (with deleting other
416:
397:
337:
147:
44:
943:
421:
933:
391:
500:
948:
953:
938:
963:
591:
637:
text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of
973:
581:
727:. As for the currently not a stub, I agree, it is currently an indiscriminate collection of links with a tiny bit of substance. It is also clearly lacking in
473:
367:
689:
Not if permission is granted by the copyright owner (SMB) for the partial use of SMB information as specified in version 4 of the corrected
Knowledge entry.
978:
928:
958:
79:
923:
664:
for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators
626:
557:
309:
299:
464:
444:
358:
332:
968:
168:
672:
from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --
135:
85:
548:
525:
275:
918:
129:
24:
99:
30:
125:
104:
20:
406:
807:
Am re-iterating here the facts already presented in this discussion, and also verifiable from the history of this posting:
266:
227:
74:
202:
175:
65:
715:
669:
141:
109:
692:
Thus history and versions 5 and up of this entry should not be deleted. Bci2Nu 00:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
208:
818:
703:
634:
630:
190:
622:
161:
55:
556:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
472:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
366:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
274:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
70:
878:
802:
784:
749:
681:
617:
and its subpgages. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,
613:
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from:
363:
51:
874:
798:
780:
745:
677:
469:
350:
326:
456:
438:
242:
221:
903:
842:
826:
732:
711:
258:
912:
866:
862:
858:
772:
724:
661:
553:
775:
and have no foundation in reality. I demand that you retract the above statements.
728:
252:
789:
Since communication on this article appears difficult, I have requested mediation
621:
it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
870:
794:
776:
741:
736:
673:
653:
be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original
540:
519:
657:
248:
899:
838:
822:
707:
271:
184:
15:
405:
625:
if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
614:
160:
552:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
468:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
362:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
396:This article has not yet received a rating on the
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
723:Permission grants need to be done according to
944:High-importance Computational Biology articles
934:Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
174:
8:
731:in sufficient numbers to allow for a proper
501:WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide
949:WikiProject Computational Biology articles
771:Your accusations are a stunning breach of
514:
433:
321:
216:
867:speedy deletion as a copyright violation
505:for tips on how to improve this article.
954:All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
516:
482:Knowledge:WikiProject Academic Journals
435:
376:Knowledge:WikiProject Molecular Biology
323:
218:
188:
939:C-Class Computational Biology articles
485:Template:WikiProject Academic Journals
379:Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology
964:WikiProject Academic Journal articles
623:"using copyrighted works from others"
7:
974:Low-importance organization articles
546:This article is within the scope of
462:This article is within the scope of
417:the Computational Biology task force
356:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
566:Knowledge:WikiProject Organizations
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
979:WikiProject Organizations articles
929:C-Class Molecular Biology articles
569:Template:WikiProject Organizations
14:
959:C-Class Academic Journal articles
660:from that source. Please see our
627:"donating copyrighted materials"
539:
518:
455:
437:
349:
325:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
25:Society for Mathematical Biology
924:Low-importance science articles
586:This article has been rated as
304:This article has been rated as
1:
969:C-Class organization articles
560:and see a list of open tasks.
476:and see a list of open tasks.
465:WikiProject Academic Journals
414:This article is supported by
370:and see a list of open tasks.
359:WikiProject Molecular Biology
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Science
278:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
729:third-party reliable sources
649:. Accordingly, the material
287:Template:WikiProject Science
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
995:
662:guideline on non-free text
592:project's importance scale
382:Molecular Biology articles
310:project's importance scale
879:09:10, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
803:07:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
785:07:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
750:00:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
682:14:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
641:, but not as a source of
609:Copyright problem removed
585:
549:WikiProject Organizations
534:
496:
488:Academic Journal articles
450:
413:
395:
344:
303:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
919:C-Class science articles
410:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
695:Furthermore, this is
572:organization articles
409:
100:Neutral point of view
819:Mathematical Biology
105:No original research
697:curently not a stub
633:, we cannot accept
615:http://www.smb.org/
267:WikiProject Science
411:
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
720:
706:comment added by
629:if you are.) For
606:
605:
602:
601:
598:
597:
513:
512:
509:
508:
479:Academic Journals
470:Academic Journals
445:Academic Journals
432:
431:
428:
427:
373:Molecular Biology
364:Molecular Biology
333:Molecular Biology
320:
319:
316:
315:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
986:
725:these guidelines
719:
700:
574:
573:
570:
567:
564:
543:
536:
535:
530:
522:
515:
490:
489:
486:
483:
480:
459:
452:
451:
441:
434:
398:importance scale
384:
383:
380:
377:
374:
353:
346:
345:
340:
329:
322:
292:
291:
290:science articles
288:
285:
282:
261:
256:
255:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
994:
993:
989:
988:
987:
985:
984:
983:
909:
908:
762:
701:
611:
571:
568:
565:
562:
561:
528:
487:
484:
481:
478:
477:
422:High-importance
381:
378:
375:
372:
371:
335:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
257:
250:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
992:
990:
982:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
911:
910:
896:
895:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
857:Please review
836:
835:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
787:
761:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
693:
690:
610:
607:
604:
603:
600:
599:
596:
595:
588:Low-importance
584:
578:
577:
575:
558:the discussion
544:
532:
531:
529:Low‑importance
523:
511:
510:
507:
506:
494:
493:
491:
474:the discussion
460:
448:
447:
442:
430:
429:
426:
425:
412:
402:
401:
394:
388:
387:
385:
368:the discussion
354:
342:
341:
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
306:Low-importance
302:
296:
295:
293:
276:the discussion
263:
262:
259:Science portal
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
991:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
916:
914:
907:
905:
901:
892:
891:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
844:
840:
832:
831:
830:
828:
824:
820:
806:
805:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
766:
765:
764:
763:
759:
751:
747:
743:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
698:
694:
691:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
631:legal reasons
628:
624:
620:
616:
608:
593:
589:
583:
580:
579:
576:
563:Organizations
559:
555:
554:Organizations
551:
550:
545:
542:
538:
537:
533:
527:
526:Organizations
524:
521:
517:
504:
503:
502:
495:
492:
475:
471:
467:
466:
461:
458:
454:
453:
449:
446:
443:
440:
436:
423:
420:(assessed as
419:
418:
408:
404:
403:
399:
393:
390:
389:
386:
369:
365:
361:
360:
355:
352:
348:
347:
343:
339:
334:
331:
328:
324:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
254:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
898:Best wishes.
897:
837:
816:
760:Other issues
696:
665:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
618:
612:
587:
547:
499:
498:
463:
415:
357:
305:
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
861:as well as
834:entries ?).
702:—Preceding
639:information
635:copyrighted
148:free images
31:not a forum
913:Categories
737:verifiable
658:plagiarize
643:sentences
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
716:contribs
704:unsigned
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
733:neutral
670:blocked
647:phrases
590:on the
338:COMPBIO
308:on the
281:Science
272:Science
228:Science
199:C-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
871:MLauba
863:WP:OWN
859:WP:AGF
795:MLauba
777:MLauba
773:WP:AGF
742:MLauba
674:MLauba
619:unless
205:scale.
126:Google
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
904:talk
900:Bci2
875:talk
843:talk
839:Bci2
827:talk
823:Bci2
799:talk
791:here
781:talk
746:talk
735:and
712:talk
708:Bci2
678:talk
666:will
497:See
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
668:be
651:may
645:or
582:Low
392:???
300:Low
176:TWL
915::
906:)
877:)
845:)
829:)
801:)
793:.
783:)
748:)
718:)
714:•
699:.
680:)
655:or
424:).
336::
156:)
54:;
902:(
873:(
841:(
825:(
797:(
779:(
744:(
710:(
676:(
594:.
400:.
312:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
