Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Said Ali al-Shihri

Source 📝

3016: 2322: 1449:
of hundreds of years of international commerce, conquest, colonization, and post-colonial and commerce driven immigration. The name-space for given names is also very rich. This makes name collision -- two individuals with the same name, relatively rare in the anglosphere name-space for individuals. The same is far from true for the name-spaces used in Saudi Arabia. Their name spaces are very sparse, barren, so the disambiguators are essential. From my reading, if you opened a Saudi phone book, you would find page after page of homonyms. Many more Saudis are in the position that an individual named John Smith finds himself in here.
1530:
most wanted web-page for the several years preceding his death, it took me about half a second to realize they had confused two other guys with similar names. There was a big tall fiery imam in London, who was one of the individuals characterized as "al Qaeda's ambassador to Europe". Any picture you see of him today he has hooks replacing his hand, and one of his eyes is scarred and blind. The picture attached to the other guy was clearly an early picture of the London Imam, when he was a little skinnier, his hair hadn't gone grey, and he had both eyes. US spokesmen quietly acknowledged the error a little while later.
777:, prior to 9-11, then went to law school. He was in law school on 9-11. Since then he has been a full-time terrorism consultant. What are his law-enforcement credentials? None, so far as I can tell, beyond serving as an expert witness. Does he have a background serving as an intelligence official, prior to becoming a terrorism consultant? None, so far as I can tell. Prior to becoming a terrorism consultant did he have any background in counter-terrorism, beyond writing his thesis on OBL? None, so far as I can tell. So, how reliable should we regard unsubstantiated assertions from his institute? 3735:
video, and that it should've been noted that some news articles discussing it also stated it's authenticity wasn't independently verified, it is only my opinion and I can't present it as a fact. It is also known that the Al Qaeda also has a long history of trying to deny reported deaths of senior leaders and do not issue such martyrdom statements until they find replacements. They even released a video recording of Abu Yahya al Libi last summer and hinted he was still alive, but did not confirm his death until September. You should also look up the terms
1508:
year or two earlier the same spokesmen had claimed that he had been al Qaeda's number three. Some spokesmen ignored these questions. Some implied they had got it right both times, that the second Al Libi had been promoted to number three, when the original number three was killed. And some acknowledged that they had got it wrong the first time -- that they had confused men with similar names, and that the first one was a second rank leader and Abu Laith al Libi had been the real number three all along.
2956:
Wikiproject:Templates and Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style#Templates who all agreed it was "not the proper use of Templates, but in this case merited an exception". The information could then be pared down and NPOVed across all 900 articles simultaneously, instead of Ali Baba Muhammad being nominated for NPOV checking this month, and Umar Abdullah al-Arabee next month. Likewise, Geo_Swan has not hesitated to tell me when he thinks I am wrong, an example coming to mind over the
331: 310: 341: 2040:
whether I recognize your use of the refname NYT as a reference to the New York Times. I don't think it should matter whether you recognize that 20070717 is a date. We can treat refnames as tokens with no inherent meaning, and copy and paste adequately disambiguous ref tags generated by someone else, without regard to not recognizing the name as meaningful, when we want to make further use of that reference.
240: 222: 1478:. One of them, when faced with the allegation that his name, or known alias, was found on a suspicious list, pointed out to the officers reviewing his status that fully five percent of the captives had a name that could be confused with his. I found it a compelling point, particularly given how many times I have seen good-faith contributors confuse these six men, or all the various guys named 191: 2747:
government claimed this and at what point the government claimed that, why a government chose to charge the subject one way instead of another way. This article must be focused on the subject's life story. It should tell a chronological life story. I have corrected the focus of the article. Please don't make such drastic unilateral unsound changes to the article. Thanks, --
2454:, but that's a different discussion for a different day). Thus, if there only claim to notability if there GB number, updating the article by removing the GB stuff effectively removes the whole entire article. Brewcrewer doesn't really get the whole jazz analogy but what he has picked up is that goeswan is pushing some sort of OR-like agenda. The same applies to 2196:"Guantanamo military tribunal documents allege al-Shihri was an al-Qaeda travel facilitator and trained in urban warfare at Libyan Camp, located north of Afghanistan's capital of Kabul. He allegedly guided extremists on how to enter Afghanistan and provided money to other fighters, the documents say. In the past, Al-Shihri has denied any links to terrorism." 1552:
newspaper were to write a widely cited newspaper article about him again, in a couple of months, under a different transliteration, we would find that the majority of the web searches turned up under that spelling. It is a flawed measure tool, which is why various wikidocuments remind us not to rely on counting web search hits.
2899:. Any changes an editor would like to make an article about Guantanamo Bay or the detainees therein must go through these two editors who are single-mindedly interested in focusing all GB article on the lack of rights given to the detainees. I hope one day this problem can be resolved, but until then - God Bless America!-- 250: 1625:
makes them sound alien and frightening, and I strongly support keeping a "first name, last name, middle name if always used in referring to the subject". So for this article, I'd support its current name (which given the lower-case 'a' and the en-dash, I'd imagine I actually named?) of "Said Ali al-Shihri".
3698:
Welcome back 75.72.35.253. I see you still have the habit of capitalizing every word you type in regards to titles. USA Today is not the only source. Shihri's survival has been cofirmed. He mentions events that have taken place after his reported death. An AQAP source confirmed Shihri was wounded but
1741:
This is something that other editors and I have tried explaining a number of times at the detainee afd's: Being held at Guantanamo Bay is not a basis for notability. A person's life is not all about being held at GB. Especially this person, who is more notable for being involved in a terrorism attack
1507:
was reported to have been killed in a high-tech missile strike. American spokesmen promptly claimed that they had taken out al Qaeda's number three. Most journalists didn't notice, but some with longer memories pointed out that when another guy called "al Libi" had been killed in a missile strike a
470:
In the interests of reabability I am striking a list of captives released in September. I believe we got to the bottom of why there were two release dates, September and November -- the new, ambiguous, shorter name this article was given today matched two individuals repatriated in the fall of 2007.
3724:
al-Shihri was referring to a February protest by making it clear that he mentioned "protests by Islamists in Saudi Arabia demanding the release of Al Qaeda-linked prisoners without specifying a date" and that "such demonstrations have been taking place sporadically in the kingdom over the past year,"
3682:
is poorly written and makes accusations that are not true. For example, Craig claims Al-Shihri was killed in November, when other other sources state he was died in January after being wounded in an airstrike. The Al Arabiya article also clearly stated his family told them the airstrike took place
3612:
Also, Yemen officials have "confirmed" his death and capture multiple times before only to be proven wrong. Only two anonymous U.S. officials have claimed that al-Shihri is alive. If the White House confirmed al-Shihri's death, that would be more reliable. If you bothered to read the Asharaq Alsawat
3589:
The only thing I did add to Tariq's article was his stance on Syria. I did edit the page, but almost all of my edits were already on Tariq's article. Both US and Yemen officials confirmed his death and already did forensic testing on his body to confirm his identity. I have already sent a dispute
2887:
they can do whatever they want in the name of "consensus." If another editor comes across this article and decides to help me deal with this POV problem I would be glad to collaborate with him or her in creating a proper neutral article. The article will remain on my watchlist but I won't touch the
2663:
Read closely, the allegations could be seen as inconsistent. Did he enter Afghanistan from Iran? Or a thousand kilometers away from Pakistan? Did he escape Afghanistan, to Kuwait, as the informant who was the source the al-Uqqla claims said? Or was he wounded, and captured near Pakistan? Was he
2449:
As Brewcrewer has explained above, his current claim to notability is the fact that he's a leader in Al-Quada. We must be consistent with the other Al- Qaida leaders and use the same infobox that they are using. The fact that other ex-prisoners still have the infobox means two things: Nobody but the
2422:
I re-installed the "war on terror" infobox. Brewcrewer's assertion that the infobox is not appropriate, because he is no longer a captive is inconsistent with how the infobox is used elsewhere. The infobox has fields for when the captive was released, or died -- clearly showing it was designed for
1808:
I don't understand how you think the essay on recentism is applicable here. I am not sure if you meant to suggest it was a policy, or should be treated as if it were a policy. If you do treat it as a policy, let me point out that it is an essay. It is not a policy. Having said that, if you think
1624:
Tch, your complaints that I'll blindly support things without my opinion offends me, I've long campaigned to "shorten" detainee's article titles as I feel it broaches an NPOV issue to refer to somebody as Sami Mohammad Omar Mullah Mohammad bin Khomeini bin Omar al-Hajj, instead of "Sami al-Hajj". It
1448:
You have not addressed an important point I have made, so I am going to try to explain this again. The surname name-space used in the Anglosphere is very rich. You open a phone-book in North America and you will see pages and pages of surnames that trace to regions all over the world -- the legacy
3656:
The people that claimed forensic testing was done were Yemeni officials. They are known to be inaccurate. Shihri has been reported killed multiple times. Also, the article you posted only "reports" his death. It doesn't confirm it. The only news agency that says Shihri's death was confirmed is the
2769:
I appreciate your work, and tried to maintain it as much as possible, while reverting some deletion of information I felt was relevant. I agree with you that it should tell the chronological story - there's no reason for us to have to read "2005 ARB Allegations" to find out which country he was in,
2383:
Since there is no surname inherited from grandparent, to parent, to child, it is completely pointless and confusing to shoehorn the name into the European inherited surname style. It is confusing, and I suspect the accidental release of some of the captives who were dangerous was the result of the
2223:
content regarding al-Shihri's actions or alleged actions belong in the article. It's important, however, that we not copy and paste the bulleted legalese from the DOD forms. This is encyclopedia, not a legal document. I do plan on going through the DOD form and putting all the accusations into this
2075:
Please don't interpret my comment about potentially disruptive, arbitrary renaming of tags as if it applied to intellectual content. Of course on a collaborative project good faith contributors will make good faith changes to others' contributions. And, when appropriate, they provide a good faith
2005:
That exactly is the problem. You created refnames with seemingly random numbers and/or letters. It can't get more ambiguous and confusing with your format. I am quite surprised by your comments about leaving alone other people's edits alone. It represents a fundamental misunderstanding of Knowledge
1551:
No offense, but the long name is essential for disambiguation, without regard to your opinion that the version used by the New York Times is more popular among English speakers. Given that he is practically unknown I don't think your google hit metric is really meaningful. If another high profile
587:
Randy: The Times and the DOD are obviously refering to the same person as you said. The problem is the Huffington Post article. The article was written in September of 2007, and it claims to refer to the Saudis released in September. However, this angel was released in November according to the DOD
2039:
Refnames are not intellectual content. Consistency is important. Some contributors choose names like NYT for refs. Adequate if the article is never going to cite more than one New York Times article. I often append the date at the end of the refnames I generate. I don't think it should matter
1933:
There is no point re-inventing the wheel. I am mystified as to why another contributor replaced the perfectly adequate ref names, without explanation. Most problematic, the renamed the ref name for al-Shihri's 2004 CSRT Summary of Evidence to "summary of evidence". This contributor seems to have
1586:
I understand what you're saying, but we can't just use one random used on DOD doc to make sure that there is no confusion. There are a number of different documents each using a lightly different name. It's simply arbitrary to use one of the names just so that other won't get confused. We might as
1273:
Arabic names are tricky. Unlike names in the anglosphere, where there is a rich name-space, the name-space for individuals in Arabic speaking cultures is sparse. The disambiguation provided by providing all the modifiers is not extraneous, is not wasted. It is essential. I have no problem with
3734:
The DNA test report also was not accurate, as was later reported that no such tests ever took place. It took a video message of al-Shihri denying his death in October to officially convince the media he was still alive; though a part still thinks that it may have been as fake as a 2002 bin Laden
3344:
Official government sources -- government press releases, government publications, government web-sited -- we accept that these represent the official government position. So long as our coverage of that material makes clear it is the government's position, not an established fact, we cite those
2867:
in the proceedings against him is intended to focus on the lack of rights he was given while in custody instead of focusing on the murders of multiple civilians he arranged after he was released. The most egregious part of the article, which is indeed a microcosm of the whole article, is that his
2557:
The opinion that his main claim of notability is because he is a leader of violent group that has killed dozens of people and because he sat in a jail for a few years is not my opinion only. This opinion is shared by a multitude of editors that have repeatedly said at multiple afd's that being in
1529:
Similarly, a couple of years, a guy named Abu something El Masri was killed in another missile strike. He was a 2nd or 3rd rank hero. I wasn't familiar with him. But when I went and looked at the stories about his death, and looked at the mugshot American intelligence analysts had put on their
638:
I suggest this confusion highlights the care that must be exercised to get their names right, because, with indifferent translations and transliteratons it is extremely easy to mistake individual with similar looking names. And, as I wrote below, this difficulty is eased when the basename is the
3723:
Wrong, his survival has not been confirmed. This is the reason why the media is forced to note that it was not clear when the message was recorded. The AFP source referenced in the article about the recent audio message also contradicted a claim made by the Associated Press's Cairo office that
3630:
How much do you even know about forensic testing? Part of it includes DNA testing. The story is not reliable at all and needs to be removed. Read a recent article that was published today about a Congressional protest against drone strikes. It talks about the reports of his death but not the
2955:
he was being accused of COATRACK and copy/pasting the same information (often with what I felt was an anti-Bush bias, and others agreed) into 900 articles -- so it was decided we'd take that "copy/pasted" contextual information and put it in a template (with consensus from Wikiproject:Terrorism,
2348:
While people with Arabic names, who live in the west, or have been influenced by western study, may have adopted the western style of name, where a child inherits the last name of their father as their own surname, this is not the case with the overwhelming majority of people with Arabic names.
2106:
get bogged down, because Mohammad Jihad's affadavit is referenced in Uthman Khomeini's article and vice versa for their small nuances, but have the same ref name. Similarly, it confuses those wonderful bots who edit to "rescue" abandoned ref names from "related articles" that have an identically
1982:
We all have natural preferences, for refnames, and other matters. I repeat, if the refname is already adequately unambiguous it is a mistake to change the refnames. It is disruptive and causes confusion, when those familiar with the old refname return to the article and want to re-use them. I
1956:
articles won't be improving the article. Such assumptions are not conducive to a collaborative effort, which is what we do over here. As for the renamed summaries, if there are other "summaries" added to the article, we should accordingly modify the ref names. It does look kinda silly to argue
3708:
Your Ad Hominem arguments also fail because you insisted that Shihri died last September. He didn't. The Yemeni articles were correct about his survival back then too. When it comes to famous al-Qaeda leaders, their deaths are only confirmed when we have access to a corpse or the group makes an
3095:
and on another talk page. Where when i remember right you choose not to discuss. The source is a low quality primary source that does not have the potential for creating a meaningful not possible misleading graphical representation of this table of number by any Knowledge (XXG) editor as i have
2960:
articles which ultimately went his direction not mine. Other examples still come to mind, and it's through butting heads with each other and with other users, that the project improves and the coverage of these individuals improves and becomes more NPOV, includes more information and ultimately
3403:
What if the contributor who decided that the two transliterations are to the same individual turns out to be mistaken? What if there are two individuals after all? If the contributor used redirection it is trivial to fix that by replacing the redirection with a new article about the second
2746:
An editor has recently unilaterally changed the whole article into an article about the legal proceedings against him. This is wrong. An article about a person should not be focused on and should not come from the point of view of a government's charges against the subject, at one point the
2387:
This shoehorning is further a mistake because individuals with Arabic names append disambiguating name like components to their name, which are not surnames -- but could look like a surname to the uninitiated. Sometimes the appended disambiguator is the town or region where they are from.
2433:
Some famous Jazz guy said that the most important thing about Jazz was not the notes, but the spaces between the notes. Something similar is true for the wikipedia. It is not the raw text that is important, it is the links between articles, and the other mechanisms we have for organizing
2289:
represent that they are just that - allegations. However, it will be prose-less to start off each sentence with "According to the Americans". While they must be in the correct prose, i.e. non-bulleted, we have to be careful to make it readable and in accordance with BLP at the same
2652:
As I wrote above, some famous Jazz guy said that the most important thing about Jazz was not the notes, but the spaces between the notes. And as I wrote above, something similar is true for the wikipedia. It is not the raw text that is important, it is the links between articles.
1849:) because it places an undue and disproportionate emphasis on one part of this person's life. He is more notable for being an Al Quade leader then for being one of the hundreds held at Guantanomo Bay. The infobox should represent his overall notability, not one part of his life.-- 3399:
There is no standard procedure for picking a transliteration of Arabic names into English. No transliteration is more correct than other transliterations. When we suspect various transliterations are to the same individual it is better to use redirection for various reasons.
3209:
If I recall correctly your explanation of your BLP concern is that this suicidal militant would find their ability to buy affordable health insurance compromised by the publication of a graph of their weight fluctations. Have I got that right? I consider this a far-fetched
2136:
I have no problem with fully and fairly covering reports that former captives engaged in terrorism, or supported terrorism, after leaving custody -- provided that coverage is well referenced, neutral, and otherwise complies with policy. This is all you want too -- correct?
3647:
According to the Yemen Observer, no DNA tests were done. The United States has reportedly requested that the Yemeni government wait until an American team of examiners can administer the DNA tests. As far as I know, the Yemen Observer is not known for making false claims.
1588: 3436:
First: "Contradicting previous media reports, US intelligence officials and an Arab diplomat have told The Long War Journal that al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula's deputy leader is not thought to have been killed in an explosion while assembling a bomb in Yemen."
3730:
Both the February anti-terrorism conference in Riyadh and the meeting of foreign Arab interior ministers in March where long planned and the issues debated, such as reforms to ensure more women's rights, were quite known to those who followed the preparations.
3028:. The fact that these are mostly primary sources has also further problems as it does not comply with the policies of BLP's of living people. So i see this topic as taken to the talk page and the image should not be re-included until consensus has been reached. 419:
I am going to request a move back to the original name. Another contributor renamed this article, to a name that had a vague resemblance to the original, based on some recent news reports. Unfortunately, they seem to have gotten the wrong guy. Captive 372,
2450:
creator of the article (Geoswan) has edited or cares about the article and since Geoswan has decided that he likes the infobox it it still there. The second reason is that most of the prisoners are only notable for being held at GB (there unnnotable per
2638:
is more important than his detention in Guantanamo. He has gone on to argue that, therefore, the article's coverage of his Guantanamo detention should not be longer than the article's coverage of his recent alleged leadership of the militant group.
3023:
The image that i have removed from the article violates the basic rules of Knowledge (XXG). It is the own work of a Knowledge (XXG) editor who took a primary source combined it with other sources and then interpreted them. This is a violation of
1345:
I am not suggesting an exception. I am suggesting that the policy already states that the name should be adequately unambiguous. Sorry, the confusion generated by your new name for both Randy and I, shows your new name failed to be adequately
2201:
I suggest that some readers are going to want to know what the allegations in the Guantanamo documents were, and are going to look to the wikipedia to find out. These allegations have been removed on the very day they would be most useful.
3131:"The source is a low quality primary source that does not have the potential for creating a meaningful not possible misleading graphical representation of this table of number by any Knowledge (XXG) editor as i have explained already." 2249:
Would you please re-read your paraphrase of the allegations? Please recognize that you have paraphrased these allegations as if they were established facts -- rather than mere allegations. Isn't that a lapse from compliance with
2057:
Even if, for the sake of argument, we think we can think of better, more-meaningful or more aesthetically pleasing refnames, we should require a better reason for renaming them. Arbitrary renamings are an unnecessary source of
3798:-- which probably should have been explained here on the talk page. That contributor left hundreds of tags that I think similary required an explanation on the talk page in July 2012, and then left the project in August 2012. 2667:
Commenting on the inconsistencies, or editorializing about them, would be a mistake. And I have attempted to avoid that. But I would like our readers to have the opportunity to make up their own minds about the allegations.
1261:, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. 1301: 3410:
But when the contributor who decides there is just one individual goes and changes every instance of the second transliteration with an instance of the first transliteration, it is very difficult to unroll the changes.
3068:
I do not believe the image in question was a violation of policy. I will wait a reasonable period of time, for a meaningful, substantive, policy-based explanation as to why the image should be considered a lapse from
153: 1359:
WRT to your comment regarding Sherurcij, I do my best to confine myself to the issues, not personalities, we should all do our best to confine ourselves to the issuses, and I would appreciate you doing likewise.
2352:
Anyone whose name starts with "Abu" is using a naming style that would translate as "Father of Solomon", or "Father of Adam" -- "Abu" means father of. This is somewhat similar to the patronomics used in Russia.
2455: 2427: 2399:
And, in Al Shihri's case, the last component of his name, which is not an inherited surname, has been variously transliterated as: Al Shari, al Shehri and Al Shihri -- which, obviously, all sort differently.
3057:...Editors are therefore encouraged to upload their own images, releasing them under the GFDL, CC-BY-SA, or other free licenses. Original images created by a Wikipedian are not considered original research, 2152:
I'm all for breaks, it's the story of my life. However, I don't know why the link provided is a reason for a "break". The current infobox is more in line with the infobox of Al Quada members, which is his
2660:, how important was he in providing support and drumming up recruits for al Qaida? The allegations against Al-Shihri state al-Uqqla instructed Al-Shihri to assassinate a writer. This is significant. 1667:
The Salim al Shihri referred to in the Worthington article was repatriated in September 2007, and, according to Worthington, was about 20 when captured. Our guy was born in 1973 -- eight years earlier.
2645:
So, he gets caught, he is named in another press release, he defects, he is accused of involvement in another attack, coverage of any event like this will provide what is needed to expand this section.
2491:
You are entitled to hold the personal opinion that his only claim to notability is that he is reported be a leader of a violent extremist group. Please don't assert this is an established consensus.
1937:
Collaboration requires cooperation. I am going to suggest that when the refnames another contributor has picked are adequate that contributors refrain from arbitrarily unilaterally renaming them.
3477:
Yes, I think he is still alive. I stumbled on this bit of news today claiming he left an audio message that "Warns Saudis of Imminent Iranian War against Sunnis, Urges them to Join Jihad in Yemen"
588:
and the Times. I compared the HP article with the DOD list of releases and there are some discrepancies. It is possible that Andy Worthington mistakenly refers to Saudis that were not released. --
3757:
Regardless, you were still wrong about DNA proving Shihri was dead. This guy is a vampire. I'll believe he's dead when we find his corpse. Anyway, looks like terrorists attacked Boston. Jesus. --
4302: 4108: 3414:
In addition using redirection makes it possible to count how many times each different name is used. This could be helpful for those who argue the base name of the article should be changed.
3703: 1742:
which killed a number of innocent civilians. Being held at GB is not this person's whole entire life story and a huge infobox about his stay at GB doesn't make sense if it is not violative of
1172: 3657:
Associated Press. The fact is we don't know who to believe. There's too much contradictions. Some say DNA tests were done. Some say forensic tests were done. Some say neither were done. --
3362:
that should be cited, that offer alternative points of view, by all means bring them forward. But, IMO, you are not authorized to keep fighting to suppress these references based on your
1200: 2535:
I believe you are mistaken that it is libel or slander for the wikipedia to cover the documentable fact that she was once a prisoner. Same with the former captives from Guantanamo.
1589:
The Saudi with a name something along the lines of Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim Al Shihri, who was in Guantanamo Bay and then went on to being an Al-Qaida leader after he was released
2993:
The article contains lots of non-US government references now, so I have removed the tag that warned it might be POV because it exclusively called upon US government sources...
2980:
since your complaint seems to be that we rely almost exclusively on the Gitmo proceedings, without taking any Saudi newspaper accounts of his later attacks into our readings?
147: 4030: 2841:
I doubt it deserves its own section, but I agree it's best to include the information in the main prose if possible, especially if we can list when he used each name, etc.
2111:
to include the subject's name (and a number if necessary) in the ref name. "shihriSummary4" or something is great. It's not a huge deal, just helps avoid too much clutter.
2770:
or who he met with, that information should be kept in the biographical section (with "alleged" if necessary), so that readers get a clear flowing biography, thank you.
4342: 4338: 4324: 4148: 4144: 4130: 3908: 3904: 3890: 3870: 1274:
the shorter names being redirects to the longer name, but renaming the article to the shorter names is a disservice to readers, likely to cause additional confusion.
397: 3231:. This is a different image, which does not contain the phrases that triggered your concern there. IMO citing that discussion here is inappropriate and misleading. 1427:
Please look more closely. Ignoring the apparent differences introduced by different transliterations the long name approaches being a superset of the shorter names.
3613:
article, you would realize that there's a big difference between forensic testing and DNA testing. Al-Shihri was mistakenly identified due to a similar leg wound.
2863:
because instead of focusing on the person who is now an Al-Qaida head honcho, the article focuses on the proceedings against him in Guantanamo Bay. Formatting this
4040: 3725: 2642:
I have no problem with expanding the section on his participation in the Yemeni group, when we get more sources for it. We don't have that press release yet.
1952:
The "other editor" was probably confused by your naming of the refs. There's no point of reinventing the wheel but please don't assume that anybody that touches
4419: 387: 4303:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/12/sources-air-strike-in-yemen-may-have-killed-imam-who-inspired-fort-hood-shooter-two-top-al-qaeda-officials.html
4109:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/12/sources-air-strike-in-yemen-may-have-killed-imam-who-inspired-fort-hood-shooter-two-top-al-qaeda-officials.html
2789:. Unless, there's a normal way of listing all his alternate names in the lede, the list at the bottom of the page will have to do. This is not a new idea. See 2785:
A listing of his aliases in the infobox does not suffice. Most readers don't read the infobox. Indeed the infobox is intended to be a quick capture of what is
79: 3743:. Many journalists do not always report with the intent of being completely honest and intend to focus mainly on attracting audiences by creating curiosity. 3704:
http://shuaibalmosawa.wordpress.com/2013/04/10/shihri-back-from-the-dead-his-latest-audio-recording-interview-with-aqap-source-on-his-injuries-and-condition/
2509:
WRT to your notion that I am "pushing some sort of OR-like agenda" -- I repeat, please stick to the issues, and refrain from this kind of personal criticism.
3840: 3561:
Which you just happened to post moments earlier. Once again, Ad Hominem arguments means crap when it comes to DNA evidence. Shihri is alive. Get over it. --
3282:. If we lived in a world where almost all experts continued to believe was flat, that is what our articles on geography and mapping would have to reflect. 454:
The New York Times article they cite, about the other guy, says he was repatriated in September. These are the individual repatriated in September 2007.
4424: 4244: 3446: 2869: 2458:. If he's not currently a prisoner, there's no excuse for us to open ourselves up to libel and defamation claims by keeping the category in the article. 1591:. Our zeal to disambiguate has no limits. Therefore, it's just most prudent to use the name that is the most well known in the english speaking world. -- 44: 3015: 2321: 363: 268: 3632: 2691:, if it places a greater emphasis on one part of his life for which he is not notable instead of the parts of his life for which he is more notable.-- 1216:, we must the name most commonly used. Thus we must the name used by the New York Times, not one of the many different name used in court documents. -- 4414: 4050: 2463: 1386:
The previous name was equally if not more ambiguous. It is one of the many different names used at the DOD proceedings. At this time, the front page
621:
The Worthington article refers to a different individual -- repatriated at a different time -- September, with a different name, and different age.
85: 4409: 3850: 3313:
yourself. My opinion, your opinion, Jimbo Wales opinion on the reliability of those official weight reports are simply not relevant. We are not
272: 4404: 3801:
I will wait a reasonable period of time, and if no one else steps forward who can explain why these tags are appropriate, I will remove them.
2868:
Guantanamo Bay detainee number (which I obviously tried removing) is given prominence in the infobox years after he was released. None of the
3272:
are not written from a neutral point of view. None of us, not you, not me, not even Jimbo Wales, is allowed to suppress material based on a
708: 354: 315: 3876: 2396:. It is not his surname. Other times the appended disambiguator is their tribe, or occupation. These are also not inherited surnames. 30: 1293: 4031:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071203004353/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/index_transfer_release_decision_ARB_Round_1.pdf
3575:
Sorry, but you are incorrect Zhoban. The newspaper is quite controversial. I also recommend you not rudely tell people to "get over it"
267:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 3758: 3710: 3455: 1079: 1027: 968: 930: 899: 872: 844: 816: 742:"Two men released from the US "war on terror" prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba have appeared in a video posted on a jihadist website, the 491:
It's a difference of two months, something understandable in regard to these generally secretive and vague circumstances. According to
3860: 3634: 3591: 3548: 3515: 3495: 2600:. Please respond to Original Research problems in a substantive manner, instead of accusing your editor of making a personal attack.-- 1719:
The person(s) who designed this box designed it to be used for both current and former captives. Note the "date of release" field.
276: 4004: 3871:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090130072004/http%3A//saudigazette.com.sa%3A80/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2009012927911
263: 227: 99: 4320:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
4126:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
3886:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2714: 2635: 2434:
information that is important. Removing relevant categories is a mistake. Removing more closely focused infoboxes is a mistake.
104: 20: 1020: 961: 868: 840: 4034: 2906: 2800: 2754: 2698: 2607: 2473: 2297: 2231: 2168: 2013: 1964: 1910: 1856: 1761: 1701: 1598: 1397: 1323: 1223: 595: 532: 502: 168: 3680: 2133:
You removed a lot of material form the article, without explaining why. Perhaps you can start by explaining those excisions.
1934:
overlooked that four Summary of Evidence memos were produced. Each needs, and already had, an unique and unambiguous ref name.
74: 135: 4041:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080227125640/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/index_ARB_Round_2_Decision_Memos.pdf
202: 4284: 4090: 812: 495:, we must follow reliable sources. The New York Times is a reliable source, the United States Department of Defense is not.-- 3514:
Asharaq Alsawat did not back the claim made by the Yemen Post until today and the Saudi source did not confirm he was alive.
3050:. Nevertheless, they have not reviewed the dozens of valid and useful images they excised -- prior to being made aware that: 1292:
If you would like to make an exception in the naming conventions policy for Arabic names I would suggest you bring it up at
65: 4314: 4296: 4272: 4120: 4102: 4078: 4072: 3709:
official marytrdom statement or "rahimahullah" comment like with Abu Yahya al-Libi and Abu Zaid al-Kuwaiti respectively.--
2957: 1157: 893:"List of Individuals Detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba from January 2002 through May 15, 2006" 3841:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090131162300/http://humanrights.ucdavis.edu/reports/heights-weights-and-in-processing-dates
2921:
I think it's unfair to say that Geo_Swan and I agree and back each other up on everything, for example I implemented the
4385: 4191: 3951: 3440: 2579:-violative infobox was not created by me. Somebody else did. So, clearly I am not the only person who cares about this. 3105:
Your are also interpreting the source by speaking of wild weight fluctuations. We do not know what these numbers mean.
1645:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
923: 869:"Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Al Shihri, Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim" 678:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
4245:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110524074928/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/08-F-0481_FactorsDocsBates300-401.pdf
4044: 4014: 3699:
survived the drone strike. The family mistakenly believed that Shihri died. He didn't. He was in a coma but recovered.
2891:
This is really not the correct forum for this issue, but I think WP is done a great disservice by this tag-teaming of
841:"Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim Al Shihri" 3447:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hGb-HbMAhncAYxfIBB3n2Q7d9juQ?docId=bd7ef17abd4b42ab813549781c1d7c9a
3227:. Your objections there were to the other image's X-axis which contained phrases that you regarded as lapsing from 2107:
named reference. (So "ref name="summary of evidence" is a bad idea). So just a note that I'd appreciate if we could
639:
longer name. Short names are fine for redirects, but the base name for the article should be the least ambiguous.
129: 4266: 4066: 4051:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090125033134/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB3FactorIndex8Jan09.pdf
2819: 1957:
about the names of the refs. It does not further any assumptions of good faith. Regards from the "other editor". --
1390:
expose which is linked all over the web (as shown by the gihts) is the most recognized name and now unambiguous. --
1305: 1184: 3184:
Let's be clear here. The justifications for the excision of the image you offered above were that it lapsed from
2717:. I'll keep my eyes peeled for them. If you have some sources to support that aspect of his life, cough them up. 2384:
Guantanamo clerical staff's inability to master the Arabic name system. We should learn from the DoD's mistakes.
2130:-- I suggest we both take a break, and, when we return, discuss our proposals for changes on the talk page first. 1983:
leave other people's refnames alone, as a courtesy to other contributors. And I simply request you do the same.
109: 4226: 3986: 3844: 4341:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
4147:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3907:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3851:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100228040335/http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3902
3727:
also contradicting another claim by the AP's Cairo office that "protests are rare in the conservative kingdom."
3260:
say, in a manner that clearly and in a policy-compliant way makes clear that any POV interpretation was in the
521:
never said he was released in September 2007, they say that he was released in November of 2007, the same date
125: 4278: 4248: 4238: 4084: 3998: 1300:
use the most recognizable name. The current name is used by reliable sources and gets far more ghits (Compare
1212:. There are atleast five possible names for the article (see "Alternative names" section in the article). Per 1072: 208: 3714: 2879:
but it is my token edit to this article. For now, I am removing myself from editing this article. Now that
743: 4376: 4218: 4182: 3978: 3942: 3832: 3762: 3459: 2500:
I didn't create the infobox. Somebody else did. So, clearly I am not the only person who cares about this.
1664:
tag can't contain blanks, unless it is enclosed with quotes. I use CamelBack names, to avoid using quotes.
4054: 3728: 3491: 3451: 2356:
In the other naming scheme, also used by Pashto speakers in Afghanistan, an individual uses their father's
190: 4214: 3974: 3638: 3607: 3595: 3552: 3519: 3499: 1890: 551: 175: 4232: 3992: 3297:"does not have the potential for creating a meaningful not possisble misleading graphical representation" 3149:"does not have the potential for creating a meaningful not possisble misleading graphical representation" 2521: 1930:
There is no point re-inventing the wheel. The infobox has an "alias" section. I put the aliases there.
1242:-- The contributor who unilaterally renamed this article, justified that renaming under the authority of 55: 4360:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
4348: 4166:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
4154: 3926:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3914: 3877:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140819202927/https://twitter.com/abdulahalmgahed/status/495630206762496001
3748: 3688: 3662: 3580: 3396:
because I think redirection is more useful in an instance like this than actually changing the article.
1114: 440: 362:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4217:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3977:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3854: 3831:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2945: 1751: 755:"A Pentagon spokesman, Commander Jeffrey Gordon, on Saturday declined to confirm the SITE information." 70: 3744: 3684: 3576: 2935: 2911: 2805: 2759: 2703: 2656:
The allegations link Al-Shihri to other topics, making the wikipedia a richer, more useful resource.
2612: 2478: 2389: 2302: 2236: 2173: 2098:
Having written predominantly Canadian-themed terrorism articles, I'll just point out that names like
2018: 1969: 1915: 1861: 1766: 1706: 1603: 1402: 1328: 1228: 1188: 1135: 600: 537: 507: 2349:
There are actually two separate, parallel styles of naming traditionally used by Arabic speakers.
3861:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081220004442/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/09-F-0031_doc1.pdf
2830: 2664:
captured at a Pakistani border crossing, or from his bed in the Red Crescent hospital in Quetta?
2592:
If I think you're basing your edits on your original research I have every right to tell you this.
1475: 813:"Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Al Shihri, Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim" 692: 570: 346: 161: 4005:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121104220259/http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=1&id=31093
2925: 1691: 4210: 3970: 3824: 3806: 3419: 3373: 3224: 3078: 2998: 2974: 2731: 2673: 2540: 2439: 2408: 2334: 2264: 2210: 2142: 2081: 1988: 1942: 1814: 1724: 1676: 1557: 1365: 1279: 782: 718: 644: 480: 459: 24: 4345:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
4151:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
3911:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
3880: 2688: 2576: 2559: 2451: 1842: 1747: 1743: 1687: 1073:"Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Said Ali Shari" 141: 4361: 4167: 3927: 723: 4260: 4060: 4035:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/index_transfer_release_decision_ARB_Round_1.pdf
3784: 3736: 3486: 1671:
No explanation was provided for the removal of the WOT infobox, so I am going to restore it.
1504: 1041: 982: 51: 3324: 3306: 3253: 2860: 2852: 2723: 1846: 1788: 3621: 3566: 3533: 255: 4368: 4174: 3934: 3864: 3189: 2597: 2282: 2188:
The allegations prepared for Al Shihri's 2004 CSR Tribunal were removed from this article.
1309: 1107: 433: 4285:
http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2009/05/27/20/recidivists.source.prod_affiliate.56.pdf
4091:
http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2009/05/27/20/recidivists.source.prod_affiliate.56.pdf
4008: 3445:
Second: Here's a very recent AFP article on targeting al-Shihri in a recent drone strike.
3110: 3033: 2901: 2795: 2749: 2693: 2602: 2468: 2376:. Just as with an Arabic style name, Lief's son presumably would be named something like 2292: 2226: 2163: 2008: 1959: 1905: 1851: 1756: 1696: 1593: 1392: 1318: 1218: 1054: 995: 774: 590: 527: 497: 4290: 4096: 3590:
notice and I expect this matter to be resolved soon Please, stop this childish behavior.
3359: 3328: 3314: 3310: 3279: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3245: 3228: 3193: 3185: 3091:
The problem with this set of graph images has already been discussed on other talk page.
3070: 3047: 3025: 2593: 2191:
I am looking at the press coverage of Al Shihri, like this one from the CBC, which says:
1636: 1243: 1213: 669: 4327:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 4315:
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2009072244380
4297:
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2009101951968
4273:
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2009012627660
4133:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 4121:
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2009072244380
4103:
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2009101951968
4079:
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2009012927911
4073:
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2009012627660
3893:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3793: 3740: 3317:. Suppressing a neutrally written, properly referenced opinion, just because you have 2981: 2962: 2896: 2880: 2876: 2842: 2826: 2771: 2657: 2112: 1626: 1479: 1313: 1108:"Consolidate chronological listing of GTMO detainees released, transferred or deceased" 892: 713: 688: 566: 434:"Consolidate chronological listing of GTMO detainees released, transferred or deceased" 4367:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
4334: 4254: 4173:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
4140: 4024: 3933:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3900: 2687:
As we progress in time, the article must be updated accordingly. The article violates
492: 4398: 3802: 3658: 3441:
http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2011/02/aqap_deputy_emir_sai.php#ixzz1YhC5SNcG
3415: 3369: 3074: 2994: 2892: 2884: 2727: 2669: 2536: 2435: 2404: 2330: 2260: 2206: 2138: 2077: 1984: 1938: 1810: 1720: 1672: 1553: 1361: 1275: 1161: 778: 770: 640: 476: 455: 4018: 3651: 2520:"...the following passage: "xx yy zz", concerns me because it may lapse from policy 330: 309: 4045:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/index_ARB_Round_2_Decision_Memos.pdf
4015:
https://archive.is/20130210073831/http://www.yobserver.com/front-page/10022292.html
2459: 2373: 2369: 1686:
The Guantanamo Bay infobox does not belong because he is no longer held there. See
359: 3528:
You are pathetic. The Yemeni source clearly said he is alive. Get over yourself.--
3305:
the underlying numbers published by the DoD were misleading you are lapsing from
4267:
https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hZfIcWnHqBz4kQR90lC_pXaHeW4Q
4067:
https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hZfIcWnHqBz4kQR90lC_pXaHeW4Q
3617: 3562: 3529: 2790: 1787:
I don't understand how you connect this infobox with a lack of compliance with
239: 221: 4333:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 4227:
http://humanrights.ucdavis.edu/reports/heights-weights-and-in-processing-dates
4139:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3987:
http://humanrights.ucdavis.edu/reports/heights-weights-and-in-processing-dates
3899:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3845:
http://humanrights.ucdavis.edu/reports/heights-weights-and-in-processing-dates
3106: 3059:
so long as they do not illustrate or introduce unpublished ideas or arguments,
3043: 3029: 1471: 336: 245: 2462:
was a prisoner, but she's no longer a prisoner. She's not in the category of
4390: 4308: 4196: 4114: 3956: 3810: 3766: 3752: 3718: 3692: 3666: 3642: 3625: 3599: 3584: 3570: 3556: 3537: 3523: 3503: 3463: 3423: 3377: 3114: 3082: 3037: 3002: 2984: 2965: 2915: 2845: 2834: 2809: 2774: 2763: 2735: 2707: 2677: 2616: 2544: 2482: 2443: 2412: 2338: 2306: 2268: 2240: 2214: 2177: 2146: 2115: 2085: 2022: 1992: 1973: 1946: 1919: 1865: 1818: 1770: 1728: 1710: 1680: 1629: 1607: 1561: 1406: 1369: 1332: 1283: 1232: 924:"Index for Combatant Status Review Board unclassified summaries of evidence" 786: 696: 648: 604: 574: 541: 511: 484: 463: 4279:
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/04/16/world/worldwatch/entry4949488.shtml
4249:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/08-F-0481_FactorsDocsBates300-401.pdf
4239:
http://yemenpost.net/Detail123456789.aspx?ID=3&SubID=1900&MainCat=6
4085:
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/04/16/world/worldwatch/entry4949488.shtml
3999:
http://yemenpost.net/Detail123456789.aspx?ID=3&SubID=1900&MainCat=6
2722:
I do not find your assertions that the article lapses from compliance with
2344:
It is a mistake to shoehorn Arabic names into the English style of surnames
1474:" in their name. Four of them had names that could have been shortened to 954: 4055:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB3FactorIndex8Jan09.pdf
3252:. IMO, you have a long record of referring to material as lapsing from 3192:. I have cited the policy that I believe shows you were mistaken about 1316:, who will come by in a few seconds and blindly support your opinions.-- 358:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 2631:
I expanded the space on the allegations Al-Shihri faced in Guantanamo.
1013: 471:
I believe it is now clear we are talking about the November guy. The
4233:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/measurements/ISN_323-ISN_494.pdf
3993:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/measurements/ISN_323-ISN_494.pdf
3092: 2713:
I have no problem with expanding the coverage of his participation in
3608:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard
3407:
Creating a redirect will address similar problems in other articles.
2815:
I prefer it in the main body, but I think it's a bit low where it is.
1103: 1068: 1009: 950: 919: 864: 836: 808: 429: 3855:
http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3902
3358:
As I have told you, many times before, if you think there are other
2596:
is absolutely not allowed here at Knowledge (XXG), especially at an
3268:
we can argue also write from a neutral point of view. Most of our
2456:
Category:Saudi Arabian extrajudicial prisoners of the United States
2428:
Category:Saudi Arabian extrajudicial prisoners of the United States
2259:
Is there any way you could describe your view of "correct prose"?
1021:"Index of Summaries of Detention-Release Factors for ARB Round Two" 962:"Index to Summaries of Detention-Release Factors for ARB Round One" 275:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 3014: 2393: 2320: 1694:. Try not to reply with huge boxes. It takes up too much space.-- 2558:
Guantanamo Bay is not in of itself a claim to notability beyond
1903:. Don't know why a new section was created on the same topic. -- 1016: 957: 3547:
Read Tariq Alhomayad's profile on Knowledge (XXG) for yourself.
3510:
Sorry, But This So Called "Evidence" Does Not Prove He Is Alive
2329:
Al Shihri's medical records show periods of wild fluctuation.
3153:"meaningful not possisble misleading graphical representation" 517:
After further analysis, I realized that you are mistaken. The
184: 15: 3881:
https://twitter.com/abdulahalmgahed/status/495630206762496001
3543:
It Turns Out Asharaq Alsawat Is Known For Making False Claims
2368:
name. This is more like the tenth century Viking explorers
1312:. Also, it't probably unfair to count towards the consensus 4261:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/8454804.stm
4061:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/8454804.stm
3487:
http://www.thememriblog.org/iran/blog_personal/en/41860.htm
3223:
You assert that you had already addressed your concerns at
2634:
Brewcrewer has argued that his alleged role as a leader of
2076:
explanation for their changes on the article's talk page.
4221:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3981:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3835:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3323:
doubts about its credibility is just as much a lapse from
1158:"Al-Oufi, Al-Shihri betrayed our trust: Families, friends" 2205:
I suggest they should be replaced, as soon as possible.
3865:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/09-F-0031_doc1.pdf
3244:
Let's be clear -- you have a long record of challenging
668:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
4009:
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=1&id=31093
3828: 3777: 3393: 2872:
have a infobox with their concentration camp numbers.
2127: 1900: 1657: 1470:
Of the 120 or so Saudi captives six of them contained "
522: 472: 4291:
http://www.thememriblog.org/blog_personal/en/20446.htm
4097:
http://www.thememriblog.org/blog_personal/en/20446.htm
2224:
article with the correct prose. All help is welcome.--
160: 3144:. Are you disputing that this is an official source? 1809:
it has advice applicable here, please spell it out.
1635:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1156:
Abdullah Al-Oraifij, Khaled Al-Shalahi (2009-01-28).
3073:, after all. If none is provided I will restore it. 2888:article if the only editors involved are us three. 1660:
because it broke links, and contained inaccuracies.
1185:"Two ex-Guantanamo inmates appear in Al-Qaeda video" 4337:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 4255:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/measurements/
4143:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 4025:
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/measurements/
3903:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2526:-- complies with the wikipedia's civility policies. 1251: 735: 174: 4019:http://www.yobserver.com/front-page/10022292.html 3652:http://www.yobserver.com/front-page/10022292.html 3604:Well, your dispute notice sure didn't last long. 2392:'s apparent surname is just the town he is from, 1896:that was previously removed without explanation. 3256:when all it is doing is neutrally covering what 801: 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3128: 3055: 2793:, a similar terrorist with a bunch of names. -- 2193: 4323:This message was posted before February 2018. 4129:This message was posted before February 2018. 3889:This message was posted before February 2018. 2875:The NPOV tag will most probably be removed by 3331:as inserting biased or unreferenced opinions. 8: 3169:-- so what is your point in using this term? 2518:As I understand it, writing something like: 1136:"Freed by U.S., Saudi Becomes a Qaeda Chief" 1901:Replied in the section right above this one 1240:Restore original less ambiguous longer name 4209:I have just modified 15 external links on 3969:I have just modified 20 external links on 2870:Category:Nazi concentration camp survivors 304: 216: 188: 4309:http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/60012 4115:http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/60012 3823:I have just modified 5 external links on 2464:Category:American prisoners and detainees 1308:). I would also urge you to bear in mind 3061:the core reason behind the NOR policy... 2575:The infobox that I used to replace your 730:I came across this reference last night: 703:Different names captive 372 was known by 372:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Saudi Arabia 1294:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Naming conventions 797: 306: 218: 2430:, routinely used for former captives. 1050: 1039: 991: 980: 3675:The USA Today Article is A Bad Source 1841:The infobox that you prefer violates 422:"Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim Al Shihri 285:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography 7: 4420:Low-importance Saudi Arabia articles 3295:So, if what you meant by the phrase 3278:concern over the credibility of our 3264:. We are not required to only cite 1302:Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim Al Shihri 709:Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim Al Shihri 560:Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim Al Shihri 352:This article is within the scope of 261:This article is within the scope of 3140:Who determined that the source was 1080:United States Department of Defense 1028:United States Department of Defense 969:United States Department of Defense 931:United States Department of Defense 900:United States Department of Defense 873:United States Department of Defense 845:United States Department of Defense 817:United States Department of Defense 683:The result of the move request was 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3679:This article written by Iona Craig 2649:It is a current event, after all. 2423:both current and former captives. 2403:So I removed the "default sort". 1663:the "name=" part of a <ref: --> 14: 4425:WikiProject Saudi Arabia articles 4213:. Please take a moment to review 3973:. Please take a moment to review 3827:. Please take a moment to review 3776:In July 2012 another contributor 3683:"in the second week of December." 3225:Talk:Mohammed_Ayub#explanation... 3046:has had their attention drawn to 2970:A note that I updated the tag to 2715:Al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula 2636:Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula 375:Template:WikiProject Saudi Arabia 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 4415:Stub-Class Saudi Arabia articles 3165:The image does not use the term 339: 329: 308: 248: 238: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 4313:Corrected formatting/usage for 4307:Corrected formatting/usage for 4301:Corrected formatting/usage for 4295:Corrected formatting/usage for 4289:Corrected formatting/usage for 4283:Corrected formatting/usage for 4277:Corrected formatting/usage for 4271:Corrected formatting/usage for 4265:Corrected formatting/usage for 4259:Corrected formatting/usage for 4253:Corrected formatting/usage for 4237:Corrected formatting/usage for 4231:Corrected formatting/usage for 4225:Corrected formatting/usage for 4119:Corrected formatting/usage for 4113:Corrected formatting/usage for 4107:Corrected formatting/usage for 4101:Corrected formatting/usage for 4095:Corrected formatting/usage for 4089:Corrected formatting/usage for 4083:Corrected formatting/usage for 4077:Corrected formatting/usage for 4071:Corrected formatting/usage for 4065:Corrected formatting/usage for 4059:Corrected formatting/usage for 4023:Corrected formatting/usage for 3997:Corrected formatting/usage for 3991:Corrected formatting/usage for 3985:Corrected formatting/usage for 3869:Corrected formatting/usage for 3160:"by any Knowledge (XXG) editor" 1134:Worth, Robert F. (2009-01-22). 769:SITE was set up by a guy named 424:was repatriated on 2007-11-09. 392:This article has been rated as 4410:WikiProject Biography articles 3667:18:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC) 3643:16:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 3626:12:31, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 3600:01:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 3585:00:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 3571:18:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 3557:17:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 3538:18:14, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 3524:16:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 3464:15:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 523:that you placed in the article 288:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 4405:Stub-Class biography articles 4391:17:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC) 3137:I find your meaning unclear. 3038:15:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC) 2958:Yemeni captives in Guantanamo 2598:article about a living person 366:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 4197:03:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 3158:Why did you insert the term 2985:14:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2966:14:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2916:07:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2846:04:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2835:03:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2810:03:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2775:04:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2764:01:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2736:03:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2708:00:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2678:23:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2617:03:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2545:02:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2483:23:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2444:22:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2413:02:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2339:01:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2307:02:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2269:01:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2241:23:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2215:22:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2178:21:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2147:20:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2116:06:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 2086:21:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2023:21:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1993:21:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1974:20:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1947:20:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1920:20:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1866:21:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1819:21:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1771:20:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1729:20:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1711:20:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1681:19:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1630:06:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1608:03:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1562:03:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1407:21:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1370:20:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1333:20:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1284:20:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1233:20:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 787:17:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 697:16:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 649:20:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 605:19:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 575:19:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 542:19:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 512:18:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 485:21:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 464:18:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 273:contribute to the discussion 3631:reports of his "survivial." 3019:Al Shihri's medical records 2961:becomes the ideal article. 2818:FWIW: his picture turns up 2325:Al Shihri's medical records 1587:well rename the article to 4441: 4354:(last update: 5 June 2024) 4206:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 4160:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3966:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3920:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3820:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3811:17:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC) 3767:20:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 3753:17:59, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 3719:14:05, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 3693:18:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 3003:07:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 773:. He wrote his thesis on 398:project's importance scale 3504:08:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 3433:Two pieces of evidence: 3424:12:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC) 3378:01:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC) 3115:12:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 3083:11:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 1926:Re-inventing the wheel... 391: 324: 233: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3957:08:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC) 3188:and that it lapsed from 2787:already in the main text 1642:Please do not modify it. 675:Please do not modify it. 552:according to the NYTimes 550:They're the same person 355:WikiProject Saudi Arabia 4202:External links modified 3962:External links modified 3816:External links modified 3772:responsible use of tags 2781:List of alternate names 2161:claim for notability.-- 744:SITE monitoring service 3134: 3063: 3020: 2951:and similar templates 2859:This article violates 2326: 2199: 1049:Check date values in: 990:Check date values in: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 3167:"weight fluctuations" 3018: 2324: 2104:"ref name="affadavit" 2006:(XXG) is all about.-- 1115:Department of Defense 685:keep at current name. 441:Department of Defense 378:Saudi Arabia articles 264:WikiProject Biography 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 4335:regular verification 4141:regular verification 3901:regular verification 3248:you characterize as 3147:What do you mean it 2726:at all convincing. 2390:Abu Musab al Zarqawi 1189:Agence France Presse 105:No original research 4325:After February 2018 4131:After February 2018 3891:After February 2018 1476:Mohammed al Qahtani 1296:. At this point we 347:Saudi Arabia portal 4379:InternetArchiveBot 4330:InternetArchiveBot 4211:Said Ali al-Shihri 4185:InternetArchiveBot 4136:InternetArchiveBot 3971:Said Ali al-Shihri 3945:InternetArchiveBot 3896:InternetArchiveBot 3825:Said Ali al-Shihri 3299:was that, in your 3096:explained already. 3021: 2822:with detainee 333. 2327: 2285:, the allegations 1658:reverted this edit 1306:Said Ali al-Shihri 719:Said Ali al-Shihri 556:Said Ali al Shihri 291:biography articles 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 25:Said Ali al-Shihri 4355: 4161: 3921: 3737:yellow journalism 3494:comment added by 3454:comment added by 2594:Original Research 2418:wot infobox redux 1505:Abu Laith Al Libi 1268: 1267: 764: 763: 412: 411: 408: 407: 404: 403: 303: 302: 299: 298: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 4432: 4389: 4380: 4353: 4352: 4331: 4195: 4186: 4159: 4158: 4137: 3955: 3946: 3919: 3918: 3897: 3797: 3789: 3783: 3506: 3466: 3429:Said is Not Dead 3302:personal opinion 2979: 2973: 2950: 2944: 2940: 2934: 2930: 2924: 2909: 2904: 2803: 2798: 2757: 2752: 2701: 2696: 2610: 2605: 2476: 2471: 2300: 2295: 2234: 2229: 2171: 2166: 2016: 2011: 1967: 1962: 1913: 1908: 1895: 1889: 1859: 1854: 1764: 1759: 1704: 1699: 1644: 1601: 1596: 1503:In January 2008 1400: 1395: 1326: 1321: 1252: 1246:-- which states: 1226: 1221: 1203: 1199: 1197: 1196: 1181: 1175: 1171: 1169: 1168: 1153: 1147: 1146: 1144: 1143: 1138:. New York Times 1131: 1125: 1124: 1122: 1121: 1112: 1100: 1094: 1093: 1091: 1090: 1077: 1065: 1059: 1058: 1052: 1047: 1045: 1037: 1035: 1034: 1025: 1006: 1000: 999: 993: 988: 986: 978: 976: 975: 966: 947: 941: 940: 938: 937: 928: 916: 910: 909: 907: 906: 897: 889: 883: 882: 880: 879: 861: 855: 854: 852: 851: 833: 827: 826: 824: 823: 805: 736: 724:Sa'eed Al-Shihri 677: 598: 593: 535: 530: 505: 500: 450: 448: 447: 438: 380: 379: 376: 373: 370: 349: 344: 343: 342: 333: 326: 325: 320: 312: 305: 293: 292: 289: 286: 283: 269:join the project 258: 256:Biography portal 253: 252: 251: 242: 235: 234: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 4440: 4439: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4395: 4394: 4383: 4378: 4346: 4339:have permission 4329: 4219:this simple FaQ 4204: 4189: 4184: 4152: 4145:have permission 4135: 3979:this simple FaQ 3964: 3949: 3944: 3912: 3905:have permission 3895: 3833:this simple FaQ 3818: 3791: 3787: 3781: 3774: 3677: 3545: 3512: 3489: 3449: 3431: 3390: 3013: 2977: 2971: 2948: 2942: 2938: 2932: 2928: 2922: 2907: 2902: 2857: 2801: 2796: 2783: 2755: 2750: 2744: 2699: 2694: 2685: 2629: 2608: 2603: 2562:, if that much. 2474: 2469: 2420: 2346: 2319: 2317:medical records 2298: 2293: 2232: 2227: 2186: 2169: 2164: 2124: 2100:ref name="csis" 2014: 2009: 1965: 1960: 1928: 1911: 1906: 1893: 1887: 1886:I restored the 1884: 1857: 1852: 1845:(a subpart of ( 1762: 1757: 1702: 1697: 1654: 1649: 1640: 1599: 1594: 1398: 1393: 1324: 1319: 1224: 1219: 1206: 1194: 1192: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1166: 1164: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1141: 1139: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1119: 1117: 1110: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1088: 1086: 1075: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1048: 1038: 1032: 1030: 1023: 1008: 1007: 1003: 989: 979: 973: 971: 964: 949: 948: 944: 935: 933: 926: 918: 917: 913: 904: 902: 895: 891: 890: 886: 877: 875: 863: 862: 858: 849: 847: 835: 834: 830: 821: 819: 807: 806: 799: 795: 775:Osama bin Laden 705: 673: 663: 596: 591: 533: 528: 503: 498: 445: 443: 436: 428: 417: 377: 374: 371: 368: 367: 345: 340: 338: 318: 290: 287: 284: 281: 280: 254: 249: 247: 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 4438: 4436: 4428: 4427: 4422: 4417: 4412: 4407: 4397: 4396: 4373: 4372: 4365: 4318: 4317: 4311: 4305: 4299: 4293: 4287: 4281: 4275: 4269: 4263: 4257: 4251: 4243:Added archive 4241: 4235: 4229: 4203: 4200: 4179: 4178: 4171: 4124: 4123: 4117: 4111: 4105: 4099: 4093: 4087: 4081: 4075: 4069: 4063: 4057: 4049:Added archive 4047: 4039:Added archive 4037: 4029:Added archive 4027: 4021: 4013:Added archive 4011: 4003:Added archive 4001: 3995: 3989: 3963: 3960: 3939: 3938: 3931: 3884: 3883: 3875:Added archive 3873: 3867: 3859:Added archive 3857: 3849:Added archive 3847: 3839:Added archive 3817: 3814: 3773: 3770: 3741:sensationalism 3701: 3700: 3676: 3673: 3671: 3544: 3541: 3511: 3508: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3469: 3430: 3427: 3404:individual. 3389: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3250:"questionable" 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210:justification. 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3163: 3156: 3145: 3135: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3086: 3085: 3065: 3064: 3052: 3051: 3012: 3011:explanation... 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 2988: 2987: 2968: 2897:User:Sherurcij 2881:User:Sherurcij 2877:User:Sherurcij 2856: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2838: 2837: 2823: 2816: 2782: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2743: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2719: 2718: 2684: 2681: 2658:Hamud al-Uqqla 2628: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2486: 2485: 2419: 2416: 2362:name as their 2345: 2342: 2318: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2244: 2243: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1977: 1976: 1927: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1714: 1713: 1653: 1650: 1648: 1647: 1637:requested move 1632: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1388:New York Times 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1314:User:Sherurcij 1287: 1286: 1270: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1248: 1247: 1236: 1235: 1205: 1204: 1176: 1148: 1126: 1106:(2008-10-09). 1095: 1071:(2007-06-05). 1060: 1001: 942: 922:(2007-07-17). 911: 884: 867:(2006-03-31). 856: 839:(2005-06-16). 828: 811:(2004-12-01). 796: 794: 791: 790: 789: 766: 765: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 749: 748: 732: 731: 727: 726: 721: 716: 714:Said Ali Shari 711: 704: 701: 700: 681: 680: 670:requested move 664: 662: 661:Requested move 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 580: 579: 578: 577: 563: 558:(372) is also 545: 544: 489: 488: 452: 451: 432:(2008-10-09). 416: 413: 410: 409: 406: 405: 402: 401: 394:Low-importance 390: 384: 383: 381: 364:the discussion 351: 350: 334: 322: 321: 319:Low‑importance 313: 301: 300: 297: 296: 294: 260: 259: 243: 231: 230: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4437: 4426: 4423: 4421: 4418: 4416: 4413: 4411: 4408: 4406: 4403: 4402: 4400: 4393: 4392: 4387: 4382: 4381: 4370: 4366: 4363: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4350: 4344: 4340: 4336: 4332: 4326: 4321: 4316: 4312: 4310: 4306: 4304: 4300: 4298: 4294: 4292: 4288: 4286: 4282: 4280: 4276: 4274: 4270: 4268: 4264: 4262: 4258: 4256: 4252: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4240: 4236: 4234: 4230: 4228: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4207: 4201: 4199: 4198: 4193: 4188: 4187: 4176: 4172: 4169: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4156: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4132: 4127: 4122: 4118: 4116: 4112: 4110: 4106: 4104: 4100: 4098: 4094: 4092: 4088: 4086: 4082: 4080: 4076: 4074: 4070: 4068: 4064: 4062: 4058: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4026: 4022: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4010: 4006: 4002: 4000: 3996: 3994: 3990: 3988: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3967: 3961: 3959: 3958: 3953: 3948: 3947: 3936: 3932: 3929: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3916: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3892: 3887: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3872: 3868: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3821: 3815: 3813: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3799: 3795: 3786: 3779: 3771: 3769: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3759:173.169.84.59 3755: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3732: 3729: 3726: 3721: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3711:151.236.17.86 3706: 3705: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3681: 3674: 3672: 3669: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3654: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3633: 3628: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3614: 3610: 3609: 3605: 3602: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3587: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3573: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3559: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3542: 3540: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3526: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3509: 3507: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3488: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3467: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3456:208.22.79.251 3453: 3448: 3443: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3428: 3426: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3412: 3408: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3395: 3387: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3366: 3361: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3321: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3303: 3298: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3281: 3277: 3276: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3168: 3164: 3161: 3157: 3154: 3151:? What is a 3150: 3146: 3143: 3142:"low quality" 3139: 3138: 3136: 3133: 3132: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3094: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3067: 3066: 3062: 3060: 3054: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3017: 3010: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2976: 2969: 2967: 2964: 2959: 2954: 2947: 2937: 2927: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2914: 2913: 2910: 2905: 2898: 2894: 2893:User:Geo Swan 2889: 2886: 2885:User:Geo Swan 2882: 2878: 2873: 2871: 2866: 2862: 2854: 2851: 2847: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2821: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2804: 2799: 2792: 2788: 2780: 2776: 2773: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2762: 2761: 2758: 2753: 2742:Article focus 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2697: 2690: 2682: 2680: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2665: 2661: 2659: 2654: 2650: 2647: 2643: 2640: 2637: 2632: 2626: 2618: 2615: 2614: 2611: 2606: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2578: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2561: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2525: 2524:, because..." 2523: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2484: 2481: 2480: 2477: 2472: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2431: 2429: 2426:The same for 2424: 2417: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2401: 2397: 2395: 2391: 2385: 2381: 2379: 2378:"Joe Liefson" 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2361: 2360: 2354: 2350: 2343: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2323: 2316: 2308: 2305: 2304: 2301: 2296: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2242: 2239: 2238: 2235: 2230: 2222: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2203: 2198: 2197: 2192: 2189: 2183: 2179: 2176: 2175: 2172: 2167: 2160: 2156: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2134: 2131: 2129: 2121: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2024: 2021: 2020: 2017: 2012: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1968: 1963: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1935: 1931: 1925: 1921: 1918: 1917: 1914: 1909: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1892: 1881: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1860: 1855: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1772: 1769: 1768: 1765: 1760: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1712: 1709: 1708: 1705: 1700: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1659: 1651: 1646: 1643: 1638: 1633: 1631: 1628: 1623: 1622: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1602: 1597: 1590: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1408: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1396: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1322: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1272: 1271: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1222: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1202: 1190: 1186: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1163: 1162:Saudi Gazette 1159: 1152: 1149: 1137: 1130: 1127: 1116: 1109: 1105: 1099: 1096: 1085: 1081: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1061: 1056: 1043: 1029: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1011: 1005: 1002: 997: 984: 970: 963: 959: 956: 952: 946: 943: 932: 925: 921: 915: 912: 901: 894: 888: 885: 874: 870: 866: 860: 857: 846: 842: 838: 832: 829: 818: 814: 810: 804: 803: 798: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 771:Evan Kohlmann 768: 767: 756: 753: 752: 751: 750: 747: 745: 740: 739: 738: 737: 734: 733: 729: 728: 725: 722: 720: 717: 715: 712: 710: 707: 706: 702: 699: 698: 694: 690: 686: 679: 676: 671: 666: 665: 660: 650: 646: 642: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 606: 603: 602: 599: 594: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 576: 572: 568: 564: 561: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 546: 543: 540: 539: 536: 531: 524: 520: 516: 515: 514: 513: 510: 509: 506: 501: 494: 487: 486: 482: 478: 474: 468: 467: 466: 465: 461: 457: 442: 435: 431: 427: 426: 425: 423: 414: 399: 395: 389: 386: 385: 382: 365: 361: 357: 356: 348: 337: 335: 332: 328: 327: 323: 317: 314: 311: 307: 295: 278: 277:documentation 274: 270: 266: 265: 257: 246: 244: 241: 237: 236: 232: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 4377: 4374: 4349:source check 4328: 4322: 4319: 4208: 4205: 4183: 4180: 4155:source check 4134: 4128: 4125: 3968: 3965: 3943: 3940: 3915:source check 3894: 3888: 3885: 3822: 3819: 3800: 3775: 3756: 3733: 3722: 3707: 3702: 3678: 3670: 3655: 3650: 3646: 3635:75.72.35.253 3629: 3615: 3611: 3606: 3603: 3592:75.72.35.253 3588: 3574: 3560: 3549:75.72.35.253 3546: 3527: 3516:75.72.35.253 3513: 3496:24.84.68.252 3490:— Preceding 3484: 3468: 3450:— Preceding 3444: 3439: 3435: 3432: 3413: 3409: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3391: 3364: 3363: 3319: 3318: 3301: 3300: 3296: 3274: 3273: 3249: 3166: 3159: 3152: 3148: 3141: 3130: 3129: 3058: 3056: 3022: 2952: 2912:(yada, yada) 2900: 2890: 2874: 2864: 2858: 2806:(yada, yada) 2794: 2786: 2784: 2760:(yada, yada) 2748: 2745: 2704:(yada, yada) 2692: 2686: 2683:Article trim 2666: 2662: 2655: 2651: 2648: 2644: 2641: 2633: 2630: 2613:(yada, yada) 2601: 2519: 2479:(yada, yada) 2467: 2460:Paris Hilton 2432: 2425: 2421: 2402: 2398: 2386: 2382: 2377: 2374:Lief Ericson 2370:Eric the Red 2364: 2363: 2358: 2357: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2328: 2303:(yada, yada) 2291: 2286: 2237:(yada, yada) 2225: 2220: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2187: 2174:(yada, yada) 2162: 2158: 2154: 2135: 2132: 2125: 2108: 2103: 2099: 2019:(yada, yada) 2007: 1970:(yada, yada) 1958: 1953: 1936: 1932: 1929: 1916:(yada, yada) 1904: 1885: 1862:(yada, yada) 1850: 1767:(yada, yada) 1755: 1707:(yada, yada) 1695: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1655: 1641: 1634: 1604:(yada, yada) 1592: 1403:(yada, yada) 1391: 1387: 1346:unambiguous. 1329:(yada, yada) 1317: 1297: 1258: 1257: 1239: 1229:(yada, yada) 1217: 1209: 1193:. Retrieved 1191:. 2009-01-25 1179: 1165:. Retrieved 1151: 1140:. Retrieved 1129: 1118:. Retrieved 1098: 1087:. Retrieved 1083: 1063: 1031:. Retrieved 1004: 972:. Retrieved 945: 934:. Retrieved 914: 903:. Retrieved 887: 876:. Retrieved 859: 848:. Retrieved 831: 820:. Retrieved 800: 754: 741: 684: 682: 674: 667: 601:(yada, yada) 589: 559: 555: 538:(yada, yada) 526: 518: 508:(yada, yada) 496: 490: 473:list is here 469: 453: 444:. Retrieved 421: 418: 393: 369:Saudi Arabia 360:Saudi Arabia 353: 316:Saudi Arabia 262: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3778:left 2 tags 3745:JoetheMoe25 3685:JoetheMoe25 3577:JoetheMoe25 3392:I reverted 3388:explanation 3127:You write: 2883:has joined 2820:here on AFP 2791:Ajmal Kasab 2627:allegations 2184:allegations 1891:WOT infobox 1882:wot infobox 1752:WP:COATRACK 1652:explanation 1084:pages 16-18 746:reported... 415:explanation 148:free images 31:not a forum 4399:Categories 4386:Report bug 4192:Report bug 3952:Report bug 3368:doubts. 3044:User:Iqinn 2122:suggestion 2058:confusion. 1472:Al Qahtani 1195:2009-01-26 1167:2009-01-29 1142:2009-01-23 1120:2008-12-28 1089:2009-01-23 1033:2007-09-29 974:2007-09-29 936:2007-09-29 905:2006-05-15 878:2009-01-23 850:2009-01-23 822:2009-01-18 793:References 446:2008-12-28 199:Stub-class 4369:this tool 4362:this tool 4175:this tool 4168:this tool 3935:this tool 3928:this tool 3394:this edit 2982:Sherurcij 2975:USgovtPOV 2963:Sherurcij 2865:biography 2843:Sherurcij 2827:Randy2063 2772:Sherurcij 2155:strongest 2128:this edit 2113:Sherurcij 1692:WP:RECENT 1627:Sherurcij 1259:Generally 689:Aervanath 567:Randy2063 282:Biography 228:Biography 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 4375:Cheers.— 4181:Cheers.— 3941:Cheers.— 3803:Geo Swan 3785:condense 3659:Kirbytoo 3492:unsigned 3485:source: 3452:unsigned 3416:Geo Swan 3370:Geo Swan 3365:personal 3345:sources. 3320:personal 3275:personal 3075:Geo Swan 2995:Geo Swan 2946:CSRT-Yes 2728:Geo Swan 2689:WP:UNDUE 2670:Geo Swan 2577:WP:UNDUE 2560:WP:BLP1E 2537:Geo Swan 2452:wp:blp1e 2436:Geo Swan 2405:Geo Swan 2331:Geo Swan 2261:Geo Swan 2207:Geo Swan 2139:Geo Swan 2078:Geo Swan 1985:Geo Swan 1939:Geo Swan 1843:WP:UNDUE 1811:Geo Swan 1748:WP:BLP1E 1744:WP:UNDUE 1721:Geo Swan 1688:WP:UNDUE 1673:Geo Swan 1554:Geo Swan 1362:Geo Swan 1276:Geo Swan 1042:cite web 983:cite web 955:August 9 779:Geo Swan 641:Geo Swan 477:Geo Swan 456:Geo Swan 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 4215:my edit 3975:my edit 3829:my edit 3325:WP:NPOV 3307:WP:NPOV 3254:WP:NPOV 2953:because 2936:CSRT-No 2861:WP:NPOV 2853:WP:NPOV 2724:WP:NPOV 2290:time.-- 2159:current 2126:WRT to 1847:WP:NPOV 1789:WP:NPOV 1480:al Libi 1014:July 17 396:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3618:Zhoban 3563:Zhoban 3530:Zhoban 3190:WP:BLP 2908:crewer 2802:crewer 2756:crewer 2700:crewer 2609:crewer 2522:WP:Xxx 2475:crewer 2299:crewer 2283:WP:BLP 2233:crewer 2170:crewer 2015:crewer 1966:crewer 1912:crewer 1858:crewer 1763:crewer 1750:, and 1703:crewer 1600:crewer 1399:crewer 1325:crewer 1310:WP:OWN 1225:crewer 1210:Oppose 1201:mirror 1173:mirror 1104:OARDEC 1082:. pp. 1069:OARDEC 1051:|date= 1010:OARDEC 992:|date= 951:OARDEC 920:OARDEC 865:OARDEC 837:OARDEC 809:OARDEC 597:crewer 534:crewer 504:crewer 430:OARDEC 205:scale. 126:Google 3794:undue 3360:WP:RS 3329:WP:OR 3315:WP:RS 3311:WP:OR 3280:WP:RS 3270:WP:RS 3266:WP:RS 3262:WP:RS 3258:WP:RS 3246:WP:RS 3229:WP:OR 3194:WP:OR 3186:WP:OR 3107:IQinn 3071:WP:OR 3048:WP:OI 3030:IQinn 3026:WP:OR 2394:Zarqa 2359:first 1304:with 1244:WP:NC 1214:WP:NC 1111:(PDF) 1076:(PDF) 1024:(PDF) 965:(PDF) 927:(PDF) 896:(PDF) 519:Times 437:(PDF) 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3807:talk 3790:and 3763:talk 3749:talk 3739:and 3715:talk 3689:talk 3663:talk 3639:talk 3622:talk 3596:talk 3581:talk 3567:talk 3553:talk 3534:talk 3520:talk 3500:talk 3460:talk 3420:talk 3374:talk 3327:and 3309:and 3111:talk 3093:Here 3079:talk 3034:talk 2999:talk 2903:brew 2831:talk 2797:brew 2751:brew 2732:talk 2695:brew 2674:talk 2604:brew 2541:talk 2470:brew 2440:talk 2409:talk 2372:and 2365:last 2335:talk 2294:brew 2287:must 2281:Per 2265:talk 2250:BLP? 2228:brew 2211:talk 2165:brew 2157:and 2143:talk 2082:talk 2010:brew 1989:talk 1961:brew 1954:your 1943:talk 1907:brew 1853:brew 1815:talk 1758:brew 1725:talk 1698:brew 1690:and 1677:talk 1595:brew 1558:talk 1394:brew 1366:talk 1320:brew 1298:must 1280:talk 1220:brew 1055:help 1017:2007 996:help 958:2007 783:talk 693:talk 645:talk 592:brew 571:talk 529:brew 499:brew 493:WP:V 481:talk 460:talk 271:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 4343:RfC 4247:to 4149:RfC 4053:to 4043:to 4033:to 4017:to 4007:to 3909:RfC 3879:to 3863:to 3853:to 3843:to 3780:-- 2926:ARB 2895:of 2855:tag 2825:-- 2466:.-- 2221:All 2109:try 2102:or 1754:.-- 1639:. 1019:). 960:). 565:-- 525:.-- 475:. 388:Low 176:TWL 4401:: 4356:. 4351:}} 4347:{{ 4162:. 4157:}} 4153:{{ 3922:. 3917:}} 3913:{{ 3809:) 3796:}} 3792:{{ 3788:}} 3782:{{ 3765:) 3751:) 3717:) 3691:) 3665:) 3641:) 3624:) 3616:-- 3598:) 3583:) 3569:) 3555:) 3536:) 3522:) 3502:) 3462:) 3422:) 3376:) 3113:) 3081:) 3036:) 3001:) 2978:}} 2972:{{ 2949:}} 2943:{{ 2941:, 2939:}} 2933:{{ 2931:, 2929:}} 2923:{{ 2833:) 2734:) 2676:) 2543:) 2442:) 2411:) 2380:. 2337:) 2267:) 2213:) 2145:) 2084:) 1991:) 1945:) 1894:}} 1888:{{ 1817:) 1746:, 1727:) 1679:) 1656:I 1560:) 1368:) 1282:) 1187:. 1160:. 1113:. 1078:. 1046:: 1044:}} 1040:{{ 1026:. 987:: 985:}} 981:{{ 967:. 929:. 898:. 871:. 843:. 815:. 785:) 695:) 687:-- 672:. 647:) 573:) 554:: 483:) 462:) 439:. 156:) 54:; 4388:) 4384:( 4371:. 4364:. 4194:) 4190:( 4177:. 4170:. 3954:) 3950:( 3937:. 3930:. 3805:( 3761:( 3747:( 3713:( 3687:( 3661:( 3637:( 3620:( 3594:( 3579:( 3565:( 3551:( 3532:( 3518:( 3498:( 3458:( 3418:( 3372:( 3196:. 3162:? 3155:? 3109:( 3077:( 3032:( 2997:( 2829:( 2730:( 2672:( 2539:( 2438:( 2407:( 2333:( 2263:( 2209:( 2141:( 2080:( 1987:( 1941:( 1813:( 1791:. 1723:( 1675:( 1556:( 1482:. 1364:( 1278:( 1198:. 1170:. 1145:. 1123:. 1092:. 1057:) 1053:( 1036:. 1012:( 998:) 994:( 977:. 953:( 939:. 908:. 881:. 853:. 825:. 802:^ 781:( 691:( 643:( 569:( 562:. 479:( 458:( 449:. 400:. 279:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Said Ali al-Shihri
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Biography
WikiProject icon
Biography portal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.